| Revision as of 05:05, 31 May 2007 editAnimalMother (talk | contribs)12 editsm →Stephen A. Kaatman?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:49, 9 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,268,253 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Folklore}}, {{WikiProject Mythology}}. | ||
| (79 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | |||
| == Titans == | |||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1= | |||
| In the "examples of giants" section, have added "(some of)" to the Titan reference. If you follow the ] link to the Wiki page it specifically mentions that large things have been erroneously named as Titanic, when the name doesn't in itself imply that. The original Titans were huge (though not as large as the Gigantes) but there's no indication that their children (e.g. Prometheus) were overly large. --MJW ] 14:08, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{WikiProject Folklore|importance=mid}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Mythology|importance=mid}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
| |target=Talk:Giant/Archive index | |||
| |mask=Talk:Giant/Archive <#> | |||
| |leading_zeros=0 | |||
| |indexhere=yes}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = Talk:Giant/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Broken anchors|links= | |||
| * <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Giants) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"Giants","appear":{"revid":70597415,"parentid":70571677,"timestamp":"2006-08-19T15:26:28Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":645418773,"parentid":645418593,"timestamp":"2015-02-03T06:39:47Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> | |||
| }} | |||
| == Suggested addition to the list of giants == | |||
| == Giants and their Origin == | |||
| The section, Names and origins of giants, should include Big_Joe_Mufferaw (https://en.wikipedia.org/Big_Joe_Mufferaw). Although I would note that the legend is (5.8-metre) taller than the historical person (6' 4"). | |||
| == Giants and their Origin == | |||
| {{hat|unuseful list of old headlines}} | |||
| As to the origin and the Belief in Giants, Megalithic structures and ancient burial mounds have probably played their part in inspiring the myths and legends. Ancient Fossil animals such as Cave Bear and Mastodon bones may have been misinterperated by Native Americans and ancient Greeks as those of great heroes and Vilains. But the most likely scenario is that there were actual tribes and racial stocks of ancient man who stood between 2-3 metres of height. This can be testified even today with racial groups who live in East Africa and South America who commonly attain statures of 6-7 ft. Skeletons of this range and taller have been found all over the world-Many in the United States. Just take a look at the many different news headlines from The New York Times and Washington Post which gained national attention during the 19th and 20th centuries: | As to the origin and the Belief in Giants, Megalithic structures and ancient burial mounds have probably played their part in inspiring the myths and legends. Ancient Fossil animals such as Cave Bear and Mastodon bones may have been misinterperated by Native Americans and ancient Greeks as those of great heroes and Vilains. But the most likely scenario is that there were actual tribes and racial stocks of ancient man who stood between 2-3 metres of height. This can be testified even today with racial groups who live in East Africa and South America who commonly attain statures of 6-7 ft. Skeletons of this range and taller have been found all over the world-Many in the United States. Just take a look at the many different news headlines from The New York Times and Washington Post which gained national attention during the 19th and 20th centuries: | ||
| '''WASHINGTON POST HEADLINES:''' | '''WASHINGTON POST HEADLINES:''' | ||
| · AN INDIAN |
· AN INDIAN GIANT’S TOMB | ||
| · A RACE OF GIANTS | · A RACE OF GIANTS | ||
| Line 34: | Line 58: | ||
| · BONES OF GIANT ANCIENTS | · BONES OF GIANT ANCIENTS | ||
| · |
· Giants’ Graves | ||
| · Find Horns on Human Skull | · Find Horns on Human Skull | ||
| Line 164: | Line 188: | ||
| · FIND FLORIDA GIANTS' BONES | · FIND FLORIDA GIANTS' BONES | ||
| · PUT |
· PUT MAN’S AGE BACK TEN MILLION YEARS | ||
| · GIANTS' BONES IN MEXICO | · GIANTS' BONES IN MEXICO | ||
| Line 182: | Line 206: | ||
| · TAKING THOUGHT ABOUT STATURE | · TAKING THOUGHT ABOUT STATURE | ||
| · |
· ‘Oldest Human Footprint’ Points to Primitive Giants in Africa | ||
| · Skeleton of Giant Early Man Reported Unearthed in Mexico | · Skeleton of Giant Early Man Reported Unearthed in Mexico | ||
| Line 198: | Line 222: | ||
| · CHILEAN FOSSIL MAN SEEN | · CHILEAN FOSSIL MAN SEEN | ||
| · HINTS |
· HINTS ‘GIANT’ ANCESTORS | ||
| · GIANT BONES IN RUSSIA | · GIANT BONES IN RUSSIA | ||
| · |
· ‘Largest’ Ape Man Found in Africa; Indicated to Top 9-Foot Java Man | ||
| · IN SEARCH OF EARLY AMERICANS | · IN SEARCH OF EARLY AMERICANS | ||
| <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:34, 12 March 2005 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign --> | |||
| == The reality of Giants == | |||
| {{hab}} | |||
| The real core issue I want to explain is that Giants did infact exist in the past-- and this should be no surprise. Prehistoric animals of colossal size; Mammoth, Bison, Camel, Bear, vulcher, and even beaver, of very large proportions have co-existed with our ancient ancestors in the dawn of pre-history between 2 million and 5,000 years ago in America and the entire globe. Examples of these giants would be: Teratornis-meriamii or Teratornis Woodburnensis, a giant vulture whose wingspan spread between 12 and 20 feet wide. Or how about the Columbian, or Imperial mammoth who stood 12-16 feet at the shoulder, Giant short faced bears 10- 12 feet tall, Beavers 6 to 8 feet long, Bison 9 feet tall at the shoulder, and camels 12 to 18 feet high. Not to mention giant lizards and reptillians whose ancient bones were excavated by native peoples--and legends likely sprang from such early fossil discoveries, combined with actual live encounters between pleistocene animals and man. | |||
| To view the skeletons of such ancient giants, you need only visit a local museum of natural history. | |||
| '''Giant humans:''' When looking at how tall humans can conceivably grow under the most optimal conditions, it is certainly doubtful that men a legitimate 12 or 15 feet tall have ever existed in the earth's past. However, tribal ethnic variations of humans averaging between 6 and 7 feet tall have existed in many ancient civilizations. (ex: Adena royal class). Infact one only needs to look at current living populations to see the reality of this: | |||
| The Dinka tribe of Sudan, men. Avg 6'5 c. 1990 (Guinness Book) | |||
| Kranhacacore Indians of Mato grosso, Brazil men avg. 6'6 c. 1956 (Guinness Book) | |||
| Thus, in such a tall average population you will likely have an occasional giant, or person of much greater size or strength than the norm. | |||
| Based on current height statistics: http://www.halls.md/chart/men-height-w.htm , atleast 1 in any 100 men are likely to be 6" taller, or 6" shorter than the average 50th percentile. | |||
| This means, that in a theoretical population whose avg stature was 7 feet, 1 in 100 men will be 7 feet 6. Using the same proportion we could | |||
| further calculate that 1 in 10,000 such men could grow to 8 feet tall. The odds then jump to 1 in 1 million who could grow 8 feet 6 ins. And then using these same numbers, 1 in 100 million might grow 9 feet. | |||
| Thus as you can see, even in a population averaging 7 feet, based on current height statistics, it would be impossible for someone to reach 10 or 12 feet, unless the population numbered in the billions. | |||
| The tallest living man verified by science was 9 feet tall, Robert Wadlow c. 1940. Had he lived even 5 years more, he may have maxed out at close to 3 meters (10 ft) tall. | |||
| Therefore, I believe you could safely say that giant humans do have a limit in stature, at about 9 to 10 feet-- and these are the individuals ( regardless of pituiary or genetics) who may have inspired the myths such as Goliath, Hercules, and Paul Bunyon. | |||
| ==Separtate article?== | |||
| It is absurd for this to be a separate article. Clearly, giants exist. Why are they shunted into mythology just as they are exceptional? --] 17:54, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| --] 09:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Yes, but there is a difference between mythological 15 meter giants, and genuine 2 to 2,7 meter people. | |||
| The mythological giants of lore do indeed deserve a seperate article. Whereas those real "giants" who have gigantism and geneticly tall stature deserve their own article aswell. | |||
| : It probably is a good idea to distinguish between people in the public mainstream world who have pituitary disorders or other forms of 'gigantism', and the ancient giants who ranged to over 36 feet in height at the greatest. This article also probably allows more freedom from the prying/attacking eyes of the highly dogmatic and inevitable 'mainstream crusaders'. Yes, real giants, like the enormous giants of mythology, certainly did exist. There does not seem to be any logical reason to disbelieve in such things when they are recorded in bones and in the history of every known civilisation, either orally or in writing. Mainstream academics are often very cloistered, however, and do not care to believe in anything that they don't see around campus, it seems. When the ancient Greeks refer to their heroes as two to three times as tall as an average man and describe physical acts by them which would be impossible otherwise, the natural reaction is to assume that the ancients were making it up or exagerrating for effect. It seems to me that ancient peoples spent much more time outside than modern academics, and as a result probably saw quite a lot more giants. ;) It is clear to anyone who really reads ancient texts and really studies history that these beings existed, but for many 'official' scholars their mind has been set up to filter out everything outside of their education. I suppose that in the future when the ] contacts are acknowledged as reality, these non-critical 'skeptics' will be tearing their hair out of their scalps at the statements by the Plejaren that human species range from 40cm to 11 metres in height, and that giants such as the cyclopes and gigantes were actual historical entities. ] 18:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: I suppose I should comment, however, that the Creationist/Christian interpretation of giants being the descendents of angels (non-physical beings) that somehow mated with physical humans, or anything along those lines, is utter non-sense. They use the fact of giants as an excuse to bolster their religion. And furthermore, I must in this sense give some slack to the closed-minded academics who deny the existence of giants as they existed, since in typical human folly they are merely making the illogical association that because Creationists/Christian fanatics promote the idea of giants being historically real, therefore, all people who believe in the reality of giants are Creationists/Christian fanatics. This is just the classic converse error, essentially. The real story of giants, as will be accepted in the mainstream sometime this century, is that they were either genetic deformities resulting from mutations or incorrect couplings of human parents, or they were descendents of gigantic humans from other star systems who simply possessed enormous stature naturally. Also, some of the giant creatures were genetically engineered by ancient humans (~11,000-33,000 years ago). Indeed, as bizarre as it seems, some human giants were the size of the ] or larger, and of course possessed a different-looking frame and stronger/thicker bones than smaller humans. ] 18:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Scientific Evidence== | |||
| While we all like to believe in the existence of true giants, I find some of these claims sketchy. I strongly question the validity of this 36 foot human skeleton. And the referenced sites are rather dodgy. | |||
| == Giant Skeletons == | |||
| I believe that alleged giant human skeleton discoveries should be investigated but with caution. It is true that the Smithsonian in the latter 1880's-1890's in their annual reports of burial mound excavations had indeed measured a number of skeletons at heights approaching and exceeding seven-feet. | |||
| However, reported human skeletons 12, 15, or 36 ft were most likely based on poorly identified prehistoric animal bones, or extreme exaggerations and hoaxes. | |||
| == Familial gigantism == | |||
| <ref></ref>== Possible explination == | |||
| Seeing as most of the information on this is testimonial, perhaps some realistic speculation would be appropriate, given that pretense exists for it. <ref>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328828/</ref> <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| It is is possible that the alleged 12 and 15 ft cases were skeletons of neanderthals with gigantism, however neanderthal remains are very rare, and a discovery of one with gigantism would certainly be well documented. The 36 foot skeleton sounds absurd, even an elephant with gigantism would not, well like said before, the referenced sites are questionable at best. | |||
| {{reflist-talk}} | |||
| :Anywhere else, eg Wikiversity, this would be a good idea. But here sources need to discuss the subject, see ] and ]. Thanks though. Interesting link. ] ] 15:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| --If modern humans can't grow 12 or 15ft, then obviously a Neanderthal with gigantism couldn't have either. The largest prehistoric ape known to have existed was Gigantopithecus, probably a quadroped, but estimated to have stood 9-10ft tall when standing, and weighing half a ton or more. | |||
| It's kinda cool how all those genetic disorders are known to be hereditary, even gigantism. Also hereditary genetic diseases never just appear but come about due to a combination of DNA and environment. Last with diseases like gigantism we see multiple genetic families carrying it, now if we could track down a location those families shared we may be closer to the nature aspect of the mutation. Or it could just be our species breeding into another species, possibly giants, then the disease would be hiding till envirmental factors bring it out again. Still one of the great mysteries of science. | |||
| There is some speculation that Homo Erectus "Meganthropus" may have been quite large, but this has not been proven.--] 20:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| https://www.genome.gov/19016930/faq-about-genetic-disorders/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == External links modified == | |||
| Not entirely true, Neanderthals were signifagntly larger than Sapiens, if a homo Sapien with gigantism can grow to be near 9 feet, a neanderthal with gigantism could come close to 12, of course this is again highly unlikely. However a Gigantopithecus is possible, though again unlikely. While the Meganthorpus' esixtence is questionable, it is not impossible. After all scientists were and still are puzzled by the Homo floresiensis, so a giant like relative could exist. | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| --Neanderthals were larger, but not taller. Same height, much more bulk. | |||
| I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
| They were shorter than modern men, but significantly heavier set. | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227023513/http://sol.sci.uop.edu/~jfalward/James_Juris.htm to http://sol.sci.uop.edu/~jfalward/James_Juris.htm | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
| == i delete something == | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
| Djinn is not a giant. By the arabs, it is considered as a spirit, frequently depicted incredibly strong and cunning, but not a giant. so i delete it. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 17:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 01:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Stephen A. Kaatman? == | |||
| == "Mythology" == | |||
| A Flordia resident, Stephen A. Kaatman, was brutally attacked and fatally wounded by a giant in Tampa, Florida on April 20, 2007. Witnesses described the scene as "the most disturbing and disgusting act of violence ever done to a human being." Authorities could not contain the giant, as he was so enraged he broke free of his handcuffs, "twisting the metal like it was taffy," as described by an officer who was on the scene. Kaatman suffered a very large skull fracture, as giants tend to smash downwards on their victims, crushing all bones in their path. The victim also had two broken femurs, a shattered ribcage, seven broken fingers, and a lacerated tounge. | |||
| This entire page refers to all giants as being "mythological creatures", which is dishonest. There is far too much archaeological evidence as well as recorded eyewitness accounts to call it a "myth" on an objective source like Misplaced Pages <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 2018-08-05 19:03:18 (UTC)</small> | |||
| while this is an amazing story can anyone find any more info on this? | |||
| :{{re|Samechillguy}} then you won't have any problems finding academic sources for the archaeological evidence. Can we please see some? (agh, where are my tildes?)<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 2018-08-05 20:03 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ] 05:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :If you mean ], we have an article on that (to which this one also links). —]] – 19:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::My assumption is that he's referring to "real giants" as supposedly discovered in the headlines listed above under "Giants and their origin" in this talk page. Probably not anything that we need to acknowledge beyond the current "alleged fossil evidence" already in the article.--] (]) 21:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Abrahamic Inaccuracy == | |||
| --Wow, are you sure this wasn't a giant neanderthal that has somehow survived to modern day, or possibly a descendant of a gigantic human from another star system as that imbecile above postulated!? | |||
| In the Abrahamic subsection of Religion and Mythology, the sentence "However, the Book of Joshua, describing the actual conquest of Canaan in a later generation, makes no reference to such people living there," is incorrect. The Anakim, identified in the article as "Anakites" are mentioned several times in the Book of Joshua. mentions the Anakim having lived in the Hill country, and mentions that Caleb drove out several descendants of Anak. The Misplaced Pages article on the ] also gives reference to their mention in . ] (]) 20:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ] 05:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:49, 9 January 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Giant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
|
Suggested addition to the list of giants
The section, Names and origins of giants, should include Big_Joe_Mufferaw (https://en.wikipedia.org/Big_Joe_Mufferaw). Although I would note that the legend is (5.8-metre) taller than the historical person (6' 4").
Giants and their Origin
| unuseful list of old headlines |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
As to the origin and the Belief in Giants, Megalithic structures and ancient burial mounds have probably played their part in inspiring the myths and legends. Ancient Fossil animals such as Cave Bear and Mastodon bones may have been misinterperated by Native Americans and ancient Greeks as those of great heroes and Vilains. But the most likely scenario is that there were actual tribes and racial stocks of ancient man who stood between 2-3 metres of height. This can be testified even today with racial groups who live in East Africa and South America who commonly attain statures of 6-7 ft. Skeletons of this range and taller have been found all over the world-Many in the United States. Just take a look at the many different news headlines from The New York Times and Washington Post which gained national attention during the 19th and 20th centuries: WASHINGTON POST HEADLINES: · AN INDIAN GIANT’S TOMB · A RACE OF GIANTS · THE BONES OF A GIANT · INDIANS SEVEN FEET TALL · WARRIOR SKELETONS UNEARTHED · Dug Up a Skeleton Eight Feet Long · GIANTS IN THOSE DAYS; Monster Skeleton Discovered in the Miami Valley · GIANTS' SKELETONS IN A CAVE · SKELETONS OF DWARFS; Curious Specimens Brought from the Philippines · EARLY AMERICAN GIANTS. ; Reasons for Believing that a Race of 20-footers Lived in Arizona. · WILD SERI CANNIBALS · ISLAND OF MYSTERY · BONES OF GIANT ANCIENTS · Giants’ Graves · Find Horns on Human Skull · OLD TIME GIANTS · GIANT IN ANCIENT MOUND · SOME HISTORIC GIANTS · FIND PREHISTORIC GIANT · SKULL GIVEN MUSEUM · BONES OF STRANGE MEN · Why Scientists Believe Mythical Monsters Existed · FIND TWO SKELETONS OF PRIMITIVE MEN · Giant Human Skeletons, 12 feet Long, are Found · TRACES OF EARLIEST HUMAN RACE FOUND · PREHISTORIC BONES REVEAL TRAGEDY OF GIANTS' LOST RACE · Town Very Proud Of Skeleton Found · Evidence of Giants Bared by Mounds · 3 Huge Skeletons Of Humans Found · WEIRD GIANTS of a DEAD PAST · Oklahoma Indian Relics Unearthed; Thigh Bone of 9-Foot Man Found in Mound · Largest Skull Ever Recorded is Discovered By Archeologist in Stafford County, Virginia · Major Finds Grave of Giant Aleutian · Giant's Skeleton Found by Soviets · Mammoth Jaws Hint Existence of Prehistoric Giants · Jaw and Skull of Oldest Man Safe in N.Y. · Prehistoric Find Points to Giant Ape Man · Strange Bones Dug Up · Giant Skeleton THE NEW YORK TIMES HEADLINES: · SKELETON OF GIANT FOUND · Reported Discovery of a Huge Skeleton · THE EARLY AMERICAN GIANT · THE BEST ITEMS BY MAIL; UTAH MOUNDS REPORTED DISCOVERIES MADE BY RECENT EXCAVATIONS TWO SKELETONS FOUND AND ANCIENT RELICS NEAR THEM · BONES OF ALLEGED BROOKLYN GIANTS · TWO VERY TALL SKELETONS · THE BONES OF A GIANT FOUND · THE GRAVEYARD OF THE GIANTS · THE CARSON FOOTPRINTS · SKELETONS SEVEN FEET LONG · MONSTER SKULLS AND BONES · SKELETONS OF A FORMER RACE · SKELETON OF A BIG INDIAN · A RACE OF INDIAN GIANTS · MOUND BUILDERS' SKELETONS FOUND · MR. JEFFERSON'S CYCLOPS. ; A GIANT SKELETON UNEARTHED AT BUZZARD'S BAY · THE WISCONSIN MOUNDS · IN THE WISCONSIN MOUNDS · A Race of Giants in Old Gaul · GIANTS OF OTHER DAYS · RELICS OF THE ABORIGINES · A TALL SKELETON FOUND NEAR PHOENIX · WISCONSIN MOUND OPENED · GIANT SKELETONS FOUND · UNEARTHING REVOLUTIONARY BONES AT 181st STREET · FIND GIANT INDIANS' BONES · GIANT RACE IN GREENLAND · A NEW RACE OF GIANTS · GIANTS' SKELETONS FOUND · STRANGE SKELETONS FOUND · FOUND GIANTS IN CHINA · GIANTS' BONES IN MOUND · Not Human Skulls with Horns · Unearths Skeleton of Indian Giant · OLDEST SKULLS YET FOUND · FIND SKELETON OF GIANT · MUMMIES FOUND IN CAVES · FIND FLORIDA GIANTS' BONES · PUT MAN’S AGE BACK TEN MILLION YEARS · GIANTS' BONES IN MEXICO · GIANTS SURVIVE THE AGE OF FABLE · HEADLESS GIANT BODIES FOUND IN PARIS GRAVES · OLD ROYAL TOMB UNEARTHED IN OHIO · UNEARTH THE BONES OF TEN-FOOT GIANTS · FIND BONES IN MOUNDS · THE GOBI GIVES US A MONSTER · TAKING THOUGHT ABOUT STATURE · ‘Oldest Human Footprint’ Points to Primitive Giants in Africa · Skeleton of Giant Early Man Reported Unearthed in Mexico · REPORTS FIND OF BONES OF MEN 8 FEET TALL · FIND ANCIENT BONES NEAR PITTSBURGH · EIGHT MT. CARMEL SKELETONS REACH LONDON · INDIAN BURIAL MOUND YIELDS MANY RELICS · Bones of Huge Man Reported · CHILEAN FOSSIL MAN SEEN · HINTS ‘GIANT’ ANCESTORS · GIANT BONES IN RUSSIA · ‘Largest’ Ape Man Found in Africa; Indicated to Top 9-Foot Java Man · IN SEARCH OF EARLY AMERICANS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.204.54 (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2005 (UTC) |
Familial gigantism
Seeing as most of the information on this is testimonial, perhaps some realistic speculation would be appropriate, given that pretense exists for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:100:DC9C:9C1B:C77D:DEA8:309A (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
References
- Anywhere else, eg Wikiversity, this would be a good idea. But here sources need to discuss the subject, see WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Thanks though. Interesting link. Doug Weller talk 15:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
It's kinda cool how all those genetic disorders are known to be hereditary, even gigantism. Also hereditary genetic diseases never just appear but come about due to a combination of DNA and environment. Last with diseases like gigantism we see multiple genetic families carrying it, now if we could track down a location those families shared we may be closer to the nature aspect of the mutation. Or it could just be our species breeding into another species, possibly giants, then the disease would be hiding till envirmental factors bring it out again. Still one of the great mysteries of science. https://www.genome.gov/19016930/faq-about-genetic-disorders/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5C5:4302:402A:3CCC:41E0:B7A4:BCDA (talk) 06:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Giant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227023513/http://sol.sci.uop.edu/~jfalward/James_Juris.htm to http://sol.sci.uop.edu/~jfalward/James_Juris.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
"Mythology"
This entire page refers to all giants as being "mythological creatures", which is dishonest. There is far too much archaeological evidence as well as recorded eyewitness accounts to call it a "myth" on an objective source like Misplaced Pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samechillguy (talk • contribs) 2018-08-05 19:03:18 (UTC)
- @Samechillguy: then you won't have any problems finding academic sources for the archaeological evidence. Can we please see some? (agh, where are my tildes?)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 2018-08-05 20:03 (UTC)
- If you mean gigantism, we have an article on that (to which this one also links). —PaleoNeonate – 19:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- My assumption is that he's referring to "real giants" as supposedly discovered in the headlines listed above under "Giants and their origin" in this talk page. Probably not anything that we need to acknowledge beyond the current "alleged fossil evidence" already in the article.--Ermenrich (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Abrahamic Inaccuracy
In the Abrahamic subsection of Religion and Mythology, the sentence "However, the Book of Joshua, describing the actual conquest of Canaan in a later generation, makes no reference to such people living there," is incorrect. The Anakim, identified in the article as "Anakites" are mentioned several times in the Book of Joshua. Joshua 14:12 mentions the Anakim having lived in the Hill country, and Joshua 15:14 mentions that Caleb drove out several descendants of Anak. The Misplaced Pages article on the Anakim also gives reference to their mention in Joshua 11:22. 173.202.22.94 (talk) 20:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:- Start-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class Folklore articles
- Mid-importance Folklore articles
- WikiProject Folklore articles
- Start-Class Mythology articles
- Mid-importance Mythology articles