Misplaced Pages

Brown's gas: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:27, 2 June 2007 editOmegatron (talk | contribs)Administrators35,798 edits Anomalous effects: whatever that means← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:42, 8 May 2023 edit undoJJMC89 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators344,652 editsm +{{Redirect category shell}} 
(50 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
'''Brown's Gas''' is ], produced by the common-ducted ], promoted by ] as a fuel for ], ], and the like. It is sometimes claimed by others to have special properties that defy the laws of physics.


{{Redirect category shell|
== Welding ==
{{R to section}}

}}
In standard ] (using separate tanks for each gas), the ratio of each gas in the mixture must be very carefully controlled before burning, as excess oxygen will result in ] of the metal, and excess hydrogen will result in ].<ref name="US4014777">{{US patent reference
| number = 4014777
| y = 1977
| m = 03
| d = 29
| inventor = Yull Brown
| title = Welding
}}</ref>

Due to the way it is generated, Brown's gas is already in the perfect mixture required for this type of welding. Brown's welding devices use ] in a common chamber to generate a ] mixture of hydrogen and oxygen, which is then passed through a flash-back arrestor and into a burner, where it is ignited to create a flame.<ref name="US4081656">{{US patent reference
| number = 4081656
| y = 1978
| m = 03
| d = 28
| inventor = Yull Brown
| title = Arc-assisted oxy/hydrogen welding
}}</ref>

This ] is also more convenient than fuels like ] due to the generation of gas on demand instead of buying and transporting containers of fuel. Brown's gas generators only require a source of water and electrical energy.<ref name="US4014777"/> While acetylene burns at 2670 °C, which is hotter than a hydrogen-air flame (2400 °C), the oxyhydrogen flame theoretically burns at a hotter 3100 °C.<ref name="Electronics">{{Cite news
| volume = 69
| issue = 2
| pages = 22
| last = Don Lancaster
| title = Investigating Brown's gas, a tiny TV generator, and more
| work = Electronics Now
| date = 1998-02
| url = http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-9314717_ITM
}}</ref>

=== Safety ===

Usual oxy-hydrogen welding apparatus keeps the gases separate tanks, due to the danger of explosion if the mixture is ignited inside a container. Brown includes a number of safety devices, however, such as porous plugs that allow gas through but not the heat of a flame, and claims that his welding device is safe.<ref name="US4014777"/>

=== Atomic welding ===

Brown also describes "atomic welding" in his patents, in which an ] is passed through the mixture of gas before burning, so that the gas molecules break into atomic oxygen and hydrogen before recombining, producing a hotter flame ("218,000 cal. per gram mole").<ref name="US4014777"/>

== Waste disposal ==

The high temperatures from burning Brown's gas can also be used for the ] of ] waste, turning the ash into a safer glass-like substance.<ref>{{Cite journal
| title = Vitrification of Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Fly Ash Using Brown's Gas
| accessdate = 2007-04-05
| url = http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/article.cgi/enfuem/2005/19/i01/html/ef049953z.html
}}</ref>

== Anomalous effects ==

Many other claims about the gas are made by proponents, such as a "self-adjusting" temperature, in which the flame becomes hotter when directed at tougher materials, but becomes cool when touched briefly by a finger. This has been attributed to misinterpretations of ] readings and the flame not emitting enough energy to burn the finger in such a short duration of time.<ref name="Electronics"/>

Brown's gas is claimed to be fundamentally different from oxyhydrogen because it implodes when ignited, rather than exploding. South Korean Hung-Kuk Oh of ] claims that the implosion effect cannot be explained by modern physics, and proposes that the effect is caused by a "strong gravitational cavity" from "] ] of hydrogen".<ref>{{Cite journal
| volume = 95
| issue = 1-3
| pages = 8-9
| last = Oh
| first = Hung-Kuk
| title = Some comments on implosion and Brown gas
| journal = Journal of Materials Processing Technology
| date = 1999-10-15
}}</ref> Others point out that the effect can be explained simply by the rapid condensation of the resulting steam on the container's walls.<ref name="Electronics"/>

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== References ==
<references/>

]

]

Latest revision as of 18:42, 8 May 2023

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect: When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.