Revision as of 12:42, 6 June 2007 view sourceMerbabu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,547 edits revert sock of community banned User:DavidYork71← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:17, 26 December 2024 view source Remsense (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Template editors60,410 editsm Reverted 1 edit by FutureBuilder14 (talk) to last revision by NiasainTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Erotic materials involving minors}} | |||
'''Child pornography''' refers to ] material depicting ]. The production of child pornography is widely regarded as a form of ]<ref> BBC News | 29 May 2001 (Retrieved 29 May 2007)</ref> and as such these images and ]s are illegal in most countries. Some outlaw only production, while others also prohibit distribution and possession of child pornography. Prohibition generally covers visual representations of ] by children under a given age but may also include all images of nude children, unless an ] justification can be provided. | |||
{{pp-semi-indef}} | |||
{{pp-move}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2016}}{{Sex and the Law}} | |||
==Child pornography as child abuse== | |||
'''Child pornography''' (also abbreviated as '''CP''', also called '''child porn''', or '''kiddie porn''' and '''child sexual abuse material'''<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=Hee-Eun |last2=Ermakova |first2=Tatiana |last3=Ververis |first3=Vasilis |last4=Fabian |first4=Benjamin |title=Detecting child sexual abuse material: A comprehensive survey |journal=Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation |date=September 2020 |volume=34 |pages=301022 |doi=10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.301022 |s2cid=225487613 }}</ref> known by the ] '''CSAM''',<ref name=":0" /> underscoring that children can not be deemed willing participants under law<ref>{{cite news |title='Betrayal: A Father's Secret' documents the dark truth that shatters a family |first=Sean |last=Keane |work=] |date=2024-07-30 |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/betrayal-fathers-secret-documents-dark-truth-shatters-family/story?id=112162568 |access-date=2024-09-06 |quote=We don't use that term, child pornography… n adult pornography, those are willing participants who are consenting to that act. With child pornography, a child cannot consent. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240826220837/https://abcnews.go.com/US/betrayal-fathers-secret-documents-dark-truth-shatters-family/story?id=112162568 |archive-date=2024-08-26 |url-status=live}}</ref>) is ] material that depicts persons under the designated ]. The precise characteristics of what constitutes child pornography ].<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal |last1=Ly |first1=Thanh |last2=Dwyer |first2=R. Gregg |last3=Fedoroff |first3=J. Paul |date=2018 |title=Characteristics and treatment of internet child pornography offenders |journal=Behavioral Sciences & the Law |language=en |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=216–234 |doi=10.1002/bsl.2340 |pmid=29659072 |issn=0735-3936 |quote="Most studies do not provide an explicit definition of child pornography. Instead, it seems that the definition largely depends on what the law defines as child pornography. Because of this, the definition of child pornography can change based on the laws that govern the land in which an individual is found guilty. Most of the studies in this article define child pornography as stimuli that are sexual in nature that include persons under the age of 18."|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal |last=Gillespie |first=Alisdair A. |date=2018 |title=Child pornography |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932 |journal=Information & Communications Technology Law |language=en |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=30–54 |doi=10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932 |s2cid=261771447 |issn=1360-0834 |quote="There is no single definition of ‘child pornography’ and indeed the term itself remains controversial... The difficulty with this is that there are hundreds of many different definitions available. Even international law cannot agree..."}}</ref> | |||
Where child pornography involves depictions of children engaging in sexual conduct, the production of this material will in itself be legally prohibited as sexual abuse in most countries. Children are generally seen as below the age where they are able to ] to images of them being used for sexual purposes. The profit that can be made from selling such images is seen as a factor in encouraging the original abuse that is photographed or filmed.<ref> spiked-liberties | 23 January 2003 (Retrieved 29 May 2007)</ref> | |||
Child pornography is often produced through online solicitation, coercion and ]. In some cases, sexual abuse (such as forcible rape) is involved during production. Pornographic pictures of minors are also often produced by children and teenagers themselves without the involvement of an adult. Images and videos are collected and shared by online ]. | |||
==Child pornography and pedophilia== | |||
Consumers of child pornography are generally ]s. Children's charity NCH have claimed that demand for child pornography on the ] has led to an increase in sex abuse cases.<ref name="gu20040112">{{cite news | title = Internet porn 'increasing child abuse' | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/child/story/0,,1121315,00.html | work = ] | publisher = Guardian News and Media Limited | date = 2004-01-12 | accessdate = 2007-06-01 | language = ] | quote = Demand for child pornography on the internet has led to an increase in sex abuse cases,}}</ref> | |||
Laws regarding child pornography generally include sexual images involving prepubescents, pubescent, or post-pubescent minors and computer-generated images that appear to involve them. Most possessors of child pornography who are arrested are found to possess images of prepubescent children; possessors of pornographic images of post-pubescent minors are less likely to be prosecuted, even though those images also fall within the statutes.<ref name="doj1">{{cite journal |last1=Wells |first1=Melissa |last2=Finkelhor |first2=David |last3=Wolak |first3=Janis |last4=Mitchell |first4=Kimberly J. |date=July 2007 |title=Defining Child Pornography: Law Enforcement Dilemmas in Investigations of Internet Child Pornography Possession 1 |url=http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV96.pdf |journal=Police Practice and Research |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=269–282 |doi=10.1080/15614260701450765 |s2cid=10876828 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180927050129/http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV96.pdf |archive-date=27 September 2018 |via=]}}</ref> | |||
Child pornography is illegal and ] in most jurisdictions in the world.<ref name="ICMEC CSAM 2018">{{cite book |title=Child Sexual Abuse Material: Model Legislation & Global Review |edition=9th |year=2018 |publisher=International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children |url=https://www.icmec.org/child-pornography-model-legislation-report/ }}{{page needed|date=June 2021}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite web |date=27 July 2002 |title=World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children |url=http://www.csecworldcongress.org/en/index.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316121435/http://www.csecworldcongress.org/en/index.htm |archive-date=16 March 2012 |access-date=7 January 2012 |publisher= |df=dmy}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Malamuth |first=Neil M. |date=2018 |title="Adding fuel to the fire"? Does exposure to non-consenting adult or to child pornography increase risk of sexual aggression? |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359178917303002 |journal=Aggression and Violent Behavior |language=en |volume=41 |pages=74–89 |doi=10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.013|s2cid=149279109 }}</ref> Ninety-four of 187 ] member states had laws specifically addressing child pornography {{As of|2008||lc=y}}, though this does not include nations that ban all pornography.<ref name="ICMEC CSAM 2018"/> | |||
==Terminology and definitions== | |||
The precise definition of the term "child pornography" varies by jurisdictions and there is no consensus in ] regarding the precise meaning of the word.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":5" /> | |||
In the United States, the ] has defined child pornography as material that "''visually'' depicts sexual conduct by children below a specified age".<ref>''New York v. Ferber'', 458 U.S. 747, 764 (1982).</ref> In Canada, child pornography can also entail depictions of fictional minors.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Seto |first1=Michael C. |last2=Eke |first2=Angela W. |date=2015 |title=Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). |url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/lhb0000128 |journal=Law and Human Behavior |language=en |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=416–429 |doi=10.1037/lhb0000128 |pmid=25844514 |issn=1573-661X}}</ref> In the United Kingdom, the law does not use the term "child pornography", though it does define a series of illegal sexual materials that are commonly regarded as child pornography.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Gillespie |first=Alisdair A. |date=2018-01-02 |title=Child pornography |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932 |journal=Information & Communications Technology Law |language=en |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=30–54 |doi=10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932 |s2cid=261771447 |issn=1360-0834}}</ref> Some English jurisdictions use the ] to sort potentially sexual media involving minors.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Max. |last2=Holland |first2=Gemma |last3=Quayle |first3=Ethel |date=2001 |title=Typology of Paedophile Picture Collections |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032258X0107400202 |journal=The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles |language=en |volume=74 |issue=2 |pages=97–107 |doi=10.1177/0032258X0107400202 |s2cid=148756344 |issn=0032-258X}}</ref> | |||
In the 2000s, use of the term ''child abuse images'' increased by both scholars and law enforcement personnel because the term "pornography" can carry the inaccurate implication of consent and create distance from the abusive nature of the material.<ref name="Akdeniz11">{{cite book |last=Akdeniz |first=Yaman |title=Internet child pornography and the law: national and international responses |publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-7546-2297-0 |page=11}}</ref><ref name="Wortley">{{cite book |last=Wortley |first=Richard |title=Situational Prevention Of Child Sexual Abuse, Volume 19 of Crime prevention studies |author2=Stephen Smallbone |publisher=Criminal Justice Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-881798-61-3 |page=192}}</ref><ref name="Sanderson">{{cite book |last=Sanderson |first=Christiane |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ut4PBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA133 |title=The seduction of children: empowering parents and teachers to protect children from child sexual abuse |publisher=Jessica Kingsley Publishers |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-84310-248-9 |page=133}}</ref><ref name="interpolTerm">{{cite web|title=Blocking access to child abuse material – Terminology |url=http://www.interpol.int/Public/THBInternetAccessBlocking/Terminology.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101008114025/http://www.interpol.int/Public/THBInternetAccessBlocking/Terminology.asp |url-status=dead |archive-date=2010-10-08 |publisher=INTERPOL }}</ref><ref name="nspccCAI">{{cite web|url=http://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/policyandpublicaffairs/policysummaries/childabuseimages_wdf56933.pdf |title=NSPCC Policy Summary – Child Abuse Images |date=April 2008 |publisher=National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, London, UK |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110626051703/http://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/policyandpublicaffairs/policysummaries/childabuseimages_wdf56933.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2011 }}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline|date=November 2023}} A similar term, ''child sexual abuse material'', is used by some official bodies,<ref name=":0">{{cite web |last= |date=23 December 2015 |title=Online child sexual abuse material |url=http://www.acorn.gov.au/what-is-cybercrime/online-child-sexual-abuse-material/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180801005317/https://www.acorn.gov.au/learn-about-cybercrime/online-child-sexual-abuse-material |archive-date=1 August 2018 |website=ReportCyber {{!}} Cyber.gov.au}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Crimes-against-children/Access-blocking|title=Access blocking / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL|access-date=29 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221084326/https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Crimes-against-children/Access-blocking|archive-date=21 December 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/industry-reporting-child-sexual-abuse-material |title=Industry Reporting of Child Sexual Abuse Material - Europol |access-date=29 September 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160817032415/https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/industry-reporting-child-sexual-abuse-material |archive-date=17 August 2016 }}</ref> and similar terms such as "child abuse material", "documented child sexual abuse", and "depicted child sexual abuse" are also used, as are the acronyms CAM and CAI.<ref name="interpolTerm" /> The term "child pornography" retains its legal definitions in various jurisdictions, along with related terms such as "indecent photographs of a child" and others.<ref name="Akdeniz11" /><ref name="Wortley" /><ref name="Sanderson" /><ref name="copine">{{cite journal|title=The COPINE Project |first= Ethel |last= Quayle |issn=1649-6396 <!-- Note that the journal itself lists 1649-639X, an invalid ISSN --> |volume= 5 |date=September 2008 |journal=Irish Probation Journal }}</ref>{{Update inline|date=November 2023}} In 2008, the ''World Congress III against the Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents'' stated in their formally adopted pact that "Increasingly the term 'child abuse images' is being used to refer to the sexual exploitation of children and adolescents in pornography. This is to reflect the seriousness of the phenomenon and to emphasize that pornographic images of children are in fact records of a crime being committed."<ref name="Mathew">{{cite journal |last=Mathew |first=Lina A. |title=Online Child Safety from Sexual Abuse in India |url=http://go.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/2009_1/mathew |journal=Journal of Information, Law & Technology |volume=2009 |issue=1 |page=21}}</ref> | |||
==Production== | |||
The characteristics of child pornography production cases varies widely. Some materials are produced through coercion, seduction or coaxing. Other erotic images depicting children are photographed covertly (e.g. showering pictures). Violent "hands-on" offenses (such as forcible rape) are rare in criminal cases of child pornography production, instead most of such cases involve online solicitation, the exchange of gifts and promises of romance. In many cases, child pornography is often produced by minors themselves without the participation of an adult.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Wolak |first=Janis |date=2012 |title=Trends in Arrests for Child Pornography Production: The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3) |url=https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=ccrc |journal=Crimes Against Children Research Center. |quote=}}</ref> | |||
In April 2018, '']'' reported that of the sexually explicit images of children and teenagers (11 to 15 year-olds) found on the Internet, 31% were made by children or teenagers from November 2017 to February 2018, with 40% in December 2017; 349 cases in January 2017 and 1717 in January 2018. The images were made by children or teenagers photographing or filming each other or as selfies, without adults present or coercing, by unwittingly imitating adult pornographic or nude images or videos (including of celebrities) that they had found on the Internet. The report said that sex offenders trawled for and amassed such images.<ref name="Rudgard">{{cite news |last=Rudgard |first=Olivia |title=Children's own 'sex selfies' fuelling rise in child abuse images |newspaper=] |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/18/childrens-sex-selfies-fuelling-rise-child-abuse-images/ |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=April 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/18/childrens-sex-selfies-fuelling-rise-child-abuse-images/ |archive-date=11 January 2022}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>''The Daily Telegraph'', Wednesday 18 April 2018, page 1 (bottom right corner) and page 2.</ref> | |||
A 2007 study in Ireland, undertaken by the {{Lang|ga|]|italic=no}}, revealed the most serious content in a sample of over 100 cases involving indecent images of children. In 44% of cases, the most serious images depicted nudity or erotic posing, in 7% they depicted sexual activity between children, in 7% they depicted non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children, in 37% they depicted penetrative sexual activity between adults and children, and in 5% they depicted sadism or bestiality.<ref name="O">{{cite book |last=Claire Milner |first=Ian O'Donnel |title=Child Pornography: Crime, computers and society |publisher=Willan Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-84392-357-2 |page=123}}</ref> A 2012 study reported that, in a sample of child pornography production arrest cases from 2009, 37% of the reviewed material was adult-produced and 39% was produced by minors with some involvement of an adult; the remaining items were produced by minors only.<ref name=":4" /> | |||
=== Artificially generated or simulated imagery === | |||
{{Main|Simulated child pornography}} | |||
Simulated child pornography produced without the direct involvement of children in the production process itself includes modified photographs of real children, non-minor teenagers made to look younger (age regression), fully ]ry,<ref>, '']'', 11 March 2008</ref> and adults made to look like children.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Paul |first1=Bryant |last2=Linz |first2=Daniel G. |date=February 2008 |title=The Effects of Exposure to Virtual Child Pornography on Viewer Cognitions and Attitudes Toward Deviant Sexual Behavior |url=http://www.comm.ucsb.edu/documents/pubs/virtual_child_porno.pdf |journal=Communication Research |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=3–38 |doi=10.1177/0093650207309359 |s2cid=10679425 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528040600/http://www.comm.ucsb.edu/documents/pubs/virtual_child_porno.pdf |archive-date=May 28, 2008 |via=Department of Communication - University of California, Santa Barbara}}</ref> | |||
=== Sexting and filming among minors === | |||
{{main|Sexting}} | |||
Sexting is sending, receiving, or forwarding sexually explicit messages, photographs, or images, primarily between mobile phones, of oneself to others (such as dating partners or friends). It may also include the use of a computer or any digital device.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Salter |first=Michael |year=2013 |title=Beyond Criminalisation and Responsibilitisim Sexting, Gender and Young People |journal=Sydney Law School |volume=24 |pages=310–315}}</ref> Such images may be passed along to others or posted on the Internet. In many jurisdictions, the ] is lower than the ], and a ] who is over the age of consent can legally have sex with a person of the same age. Many laws on child pornography were passed before ] became common among teenagers close in age to or over the age of consent and sexting was understood as a phenomenon. Teenagers who are legally able to consent to sex, but under the age of majority, can be charged with production and distribution of child pornography if they send naked images of themselves to friends or sex partners of the same age.<ref>{{cite web |date=14 December 2008 |title=Sexting teens can go too far - 12/14/08 - Philadelphia News - 6abc.com |url=https://6abc.com/archive/6555650/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100131095242/http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news%2Ftechnology&id=6555650 |archive-date=31 January 2010 |access-date=16 October 2009 |publisher=Abclocal.go.com}}</ref><ref name="Wolak">{{cite journal |last1=Wolak |first1=Janis |last2=Finkelhor |first2=David |last3=Mitchell |first3=Kimberly |date=April 2012 |title=Trends in Arrests for Child Pornography Production: The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3) |url=https://scholars.unh.edu/ccrc/47/ |journal=Crimes Against Children Research Center |location=Durham, NH}}</ref> The University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center estimates that 7 percent of people arrested on suspicion of child pornography production in 2009 were teenagers who shared images with peers consensually.<ref name="Wolak" /> Such arrests also include teenage couples or friends with a small ], where one is a legal adult and the other is not.<ref name="Feyerick">{{cite web |last1=Feyerick |first1=Deborah |last2=Steffen |first2=Sheila |title='Sexting' lands teen on sex offender list - CNN.com |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/07/sexting.busts/ |access-date=29 September 2016 |work=CNN's American Morning}}</ref><ref name="Brady">{{cite web |last=Brady |first=Nicole |date=23 July 2011 |title='Sexting' youths placed on sex offenders register |url=http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sexting-youths-placed-on-sex-offenders-register-20110723-1hugu.html |access-date=29 September 2016}}</ref> In some countries, ] requires anybody convicted of such an offense to be placed on a ].<ref name="Feyerick" /><ref name="Brady" /> | |||
{{Globalize section|date=November 2023|the United States}} | |||
Legal professionals and academics have criticized the use of child pornography laws with mandatory punishments against teenagers over the age of consent for sex offenses. Florida cyber crimes defense attorney David S. Seltzer wrote of this that "I do not believe that our child pornography laws were designed for these situations ... A conviction for possession of child pornography in Florida draws up to five years in prison for each picture or video, plus a lifelong requirement to register as a sex offender."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170201232859/http://www.cybercrimelawyerblog.com/2008/12/miami_criminal_defense_lawyer_1.html|date=1 February 2017}}, December 2008</ref> | |||
In a 2013 interview, assistant professor of communications at the ], Amy Adele Hasinoff, who studies the repercussions of sexting has stated that the "very harsh" child pornography laws are "designed to address adults exploiting children" and should not replace better sex education and consent training for teens. She went on to say, "Sexting is a sex act, and if it's consensual, that's fine ... Anyone who distributes these pictures without consent is doing something malicious and abusive, but child pornography laws are too harsh to address it."<ref name="2013CaNPSelfiePorn">{{cite web |last=Seidman |first=Karen |title=Child pornography laws 'too harsh' to deal with minors sexting photos without consent, experts say |url=http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/11/16/child-pornography-laws-too-harsh-to-deal-with-minors-sexting-photos-without-consent-experts-say/ |access-date=27 March 2014 |publisher=National Post News – Canada}}</ref> | |||
====Cybersex trafficking==== | |||
{{Main|Cybersex trafficking}} | |||
Child victims of cybersex trafficking are forced into ],<ref>{{citation |last1=Brown |first1=Rick |title=Australians who view live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of financial transactions |year=2020 |publisher=Australian Institute of Criminology |isbn=9781925304336 |last2=Napier |first2=Sarah |last3=Smith |first3=Russell G}} pp. 1–4.</ref> pornographic exploitation<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Carback |first1=Joshua T. |date=2018 |title=Cybersex Trafficking: Toward a More Effective Prosecutorial Response |journal=Criminal Law Bulletin |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=64–183 |ssrn=3171275}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=July 8, 2014 |title=Philippine children exploited in billion-dollar webcam paedophilia industry |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/philippine-children-exploited-in-billiondollar-webcam-paedophilia-industry-20140708-zszsd.html |website=The Sydney Morning Herald}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=January 13, 2019 |title=6 Iligan kids rescued from cybersex den |url=https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1058765 |website=Philippine News Agency}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=May 12, 2017 |title=Philippines Makes More Child Cybersex Crime Arrests, Rescues |url=https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/philippines-makes-more-child-cybersex-crime-arrests-rescues |website=VOA}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=March 27, 2017 |title=First paedophile in NSW charged with cybersex trafficking |url=https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/first-paedophile-in-nsw-charged-with-cybersex-trafficking/news-story/bd7d1e178b1f6f55ad99f8d0433afa94 |website=the Daily Telegraph}}</ref> on webcam which can be recorded and later sold.<ref>{{cite web |date=2015 |title=Study on the Effects of New Information Technologies on the Abuse and Exploitation of Children |url=https://www.unodc.org/documents/Cybercrime/Study_on_the_Effects.pdf |website=UNODC}}</ref> Victims are raped by traffickers or coerced to perform sex acts on themselves or other children while being filmed and broadcast in real time. They are frequently forced to watch the paying consumers on shared screens and follow their orders.<ref name="cnn.com">{{cite web |date=July 18, 2013 |title=Cyber-sex trafficking: A 21st century scourge |url=https://www.cnn.com/2013/07/17/world/asia/philippines-cybersex-trafficking/index.html |website=CNN}}</ref> It occurs in 'cybersex dens', which are rooms equipped with ].<ref>{{cite web |date=June 8, 2016 |title=International Efforts by Police Leadership to Combat Human Trafficking |url=https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/international-efforts-by-police-leadership-to-combat-human-trafficking |website=FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin}}</ref><ref name="cnn.com" /> Overseas predators and pedophiles seek out and pay to watch the victims.<ref>{{cite web |date=May 6, 2019 |title=Philippines targets cybersex trafficking but young victims are often left in limbo |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3008948/philippines-targets-cybersex-trafficking-young-victims-are |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=June 30, 2018 |title=Cheap tech and widespread internet access fuel rise in cybersex trafficking |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/cheap-tech-widespread-internet-access-fuel-rise-cybersex-trafficking-n886886 |website=NBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=December 1, 2016 |title=Surge in online sex trade of children challenges anti-slavery campaigners |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-conference-women-cybersextrafficking/surge-in-online-sex-trade-of-children-challenges-anti-slavery-campaigners-idUSKBN13Q54E |website=Reuters}}</ref> | |||
==Distribution and receipt== | |||
] notes that there is "overwhelming evidence that is all but impossible to obtain through nonelectronic means."<ref>{{cite book |last=Jenkins |first=Philip |title=At Issue: Child Sexual Abuse |date=2005 |publisher=Greenhaven Press |isbn=978-1565106888 |editor-last=Lewis |editor-first=Angela |location=San Diego, California |chapter=Law Enforcement Efforts Against Child Pornography Are Ineffective}}</ref> The Internet has radically changed how child pornography is reproduced and disseminated, and, according to the ], resulted in a massive increase in the "availability, accessibility, and volume of child pornography."<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080306150623/http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/ceos/childporn.html|date=6 March 2008}}, Child Exploitation and Obscenity, Department of Justice</ref> | |||
Digital cameras and Internet distribution facilitated by the use of credit cards and the ease of transferring images across national borders has made it easier than ever before for users of child pornography to obtain the photographs and videos.<ref name="doj1" /><ref name="ncmec">{{cite web |date=5 August 2005 |title=Child porn among fastest growing internet businesses |url=http://www.ncmec.org/missingkids/servlet/NewsEventServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2064 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071018231331/http://www.ncmec.org/missingkids/servlet/NewsEventServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2064 |archive-date=18 October 2007 |access-date=13 March 2008 |publisher=National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, USA |df=dmy-all}}</ref> | |||
In 2019, the ] reported that child pornography was now a crisis. Tech companies such as ], ] and ] reported over 18 million cases of child sexual abuse material, which includes over 45 million images and videos.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Keller |first1=Michael H. |last2=Dance |first2=Gabriel J. X. |date=2019-09-28 |title=The Internet Is Overrun With Images of Child Sexual Abuse. What Went Wrong? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/28/us/child-sex-abuse.html |access-date=2020-05-22 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> | |||
In 2023, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received 36.2 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation, an increase of 12% from 2022.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CyberTipline Data |url=https://www.missingkids.org/cybertiplinedata |access-date=2024-10-18 |website=National Center for Missing & Exploited Children |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Offender characteristics == | |||
Child pornography offenders are predominantly white, male, aged between 25 and 50 years and, in relation to "hands on" child sex abusers, more likely to be employed. On multiple studies, they have been reported to have higher education at a rate of 30%. Research has also shown that around 50% of child pornography offenders were single either at the time of their offences or after they were prosecuted.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Houtepen |first1=Jenny A.B.M. |last2=Sijtsema |first2=Jelle J. |last3=Bogaerts |first3=Stefan |date=2014 |title=From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risks for cross-over |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359178914000810 |journal=Aggression and Violent Behavior |language=en |volume=19 |issue=5 |pages=466–473 |doi=10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.011}}</ref> Child pornography offenders are also less likely to be parents compared to ''contact'' offenders. Scholars have also found that while "hands-on" offenders are relatively likely to transition into pornography offenders (with some admitting to using child pornography as a substitute for committing ''contact'' offenses), the opposite is rarely the case.<ref name=":7" /> | |||
In a study conducted by ] in 2010, 33–50% of a sample of child pornography offenders reported having sexual interest in children. Another 2009 study diagnosed 31% of its sample of online child sex offenders with pedophilia. Aside from a predominant sexual interest in children, other reasons for online child pornography offending include indiscriminate sexual interest, ] and accidental access to child pornography material.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal |last1=Ly |first1=Thanh |last2=Dwyer |first2=R. Gregg |last3=Fedoroff |first3=J. Paul |date=March 2018 |title=Characteristics and treatment of internet child pornography offenders |journal=Behavioral Sciences & the Law |language=en |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=216–234 |doi=10.1002/bsl.2340 |pmid=29659072 |issn=0735-3936|doi-access=free }}</ref> Having a history of child pornography offending has been stated by some researchers to be a valid diagnostic indicator of ].<ref name=":8" /> | |||
A meta-analysis of nine studies conducted by Seto in 2011 reported a sexual recidivism rate of 5% for follow-up periods ranging from one to six years. Another paper published by Seto in 2015 reported a sexual ] of 11% in a 5-year follow-up period. Research has also shown that offenders that measure high on ] and atypical sexual interests are most likely to sexually reoffend.<ref name=":3" /> Other studies have also reported rates of recidivism for child pornography offenders that are inferior to those of ''contact'' child sex offenders. People who have committed both pornography and contact offences have a higher recidivism rate for contact offences than child pornography offenders.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal |last1=Babchishin |first1=Kelly M. |last2=Hanson |first2=R. Karl |last3=VanZuylen |first3=Heather |date=2015 |title=Online Child Pornography Offenders are Different: A Meta-analysis of the Characteristics of Online and Offline Sex Offenders Against Children |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x |journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior |language=en |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=45–66 |doi=10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x |pmid=24627189 |s2cid=254251866 |issn=0004-0002}}</ref> | |||
==Relation to child molestation== | |||
{{Main|Relationship between child pornography and child sexual abuse}} | |||
Experts differ over any causal link between child pornography and child sexual abuse, with some experts saying that it increases the risk of child sexual abuse,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Carr |first=John |year=2004 |title=Child abuse, child pornography and the internet: Executive summary |journal=NCH |issue=1}}</ref> and others saying that use of child pornography reduces the risk of offending.<ref name="radio.cz">{{cite web|url=http://www.radio.cz/en/article/88189 |title=Child porn consumers safe from prosecution in the Czech Republic |date=9 February 2007 |publisher=Radio.cz |access-date=16 October 2009}}</ref><ref>]. Pacific Center for Sex and Society", University of Hawai’i, 4 October 2009. Retrieved 8 June 2014.</ref> A 2008 American review of the use of Internet communication to lure children outlines the possible links to actual behaviour regarding the effects of Internet child pornography.<ref name=Onlinepred>{{cite journal |last1=Wolak |first1=Janis |last2=Finkelhor |first2=David |last3=Mitchell |first3=Kimberly J. |last4=Ybarra |first4=Michele L. |title=Online 'predators' and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment |journal=American Psychologist |date=2008 |volume=63 |issue=2 |pages=111–128 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.111 |pmid=18284279 |citeseerx=10.1.1.362.8143 }}</ref> | |||
According to one paper from the ] based on case reports of those under treatment, 30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child. As the total number of those who view such images can not be ascertained, the ratio of passive viewing to molestation remains unknown. The report also notes that it is difficult to define the progression from computerized child pornography to physical acts against children.<ref name="mayoclinic04_2007">{{cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Ryan C.W. |last2=Hall |first2=Richard C.W. |date=April 2007 |title=A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues |url=http://drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf |journal=Mayo Clinic Proceedings |volume=82 |issue=4 |pages=457–471 |doi=10.4065/82.4.457 |pmid=17418075 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170317054951/http://drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf |archive-date=17 March 2017 |via=Dr. Ryan Hall}}</ref> Several professors of psychology state that memories of child abuse are maintained as long as visual records exist, are accessed, and are "exploited perversely."<ref name="Wortley17">{{cite journal |last=Wortley |first=Richard |author2=Stephen Smallbone |title=Child Pornography on the Internet |journal=Problem-Oriented Guides for Police |volume=41 |page=17 |quote=The children portrayed in child pornography are first victimized when their abuse is perpetrated and recorded. They are further victimized each time that record is accessed.}}</ref><ref name="sheldon9">{{cite book |last=Sheldon |first=Kerry |url=https://archive.org/details/sexoffendersinte0000shel |title=Sex Offenders and the Internet |author2=Dennis Howitt |publisher=John Wiley and Sons |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-470-02800-1 |page=9 |quote=...supplying the material to meet this demand results in the further abuse of children Pictures, films and videos function as a permanent record of the original sexual abuse. Consequently, memories of the trauma and abuse are maintained as long as the record exists. Victims filmed and photographed many years ago will nevertheless be aware throughout their lifetimes that their childhood victimization continues to be exploited perversely. |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
A study by Wolak, ], and Mitchell states that:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wolak |first1=Janis |last2=Finkelhor |first2=David |last3=Mitchell |first3=Kimberly |title=Child Pornography Possessors: Trends in Offender and Case Characteristics |journal=Sexual Abuse |date=March 2011 |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=22–42 |doi=10.1177/1079063210372143 |pmid=21349830 |s2cid=14088692 }}</ref><blockquote>ates of child sexual abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds to the spread of CP online. ... The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes in investigatory or statistical procedures. ... o date, there has not been a spike in the rate of child sexual abuse that corresponds with the apparent expansion of online CP.</blockquote> | |||
== Ethics == | |||
The study of the ethics regarding child pornography has been greatly neglected among academics.<ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last=Bray |first=Abigail |date=2011 |title=Merciless Doctrines: Child Pornography, Censorship, and Late Capitalism |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/660178 |journal=Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=133–158 |doi=10.1086/660178 |s2cid=146765015 |issn=0097-9740}}</ref> Feminist writer ] has argued that the absence of ethical literature regarding the topic can be explained by the simplicity of the matter, given that "there a general consensus about the harm involved" in this type of material.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=King |first=Peter J. |date=2008 |title=No Plaything: Ethical Issues Concerning Child-pornography |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10677-007-9095-1 |journal=Ethical Theory and Moral Practice |language=en |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=327–345 |doi=10.1007/s10677-007-9095-1 |issn=1386-2820}}</ref> | |||
Some scholars have argued that the possession of child pornography is immoral because it would validate the act of child sexual abuse or actively encourage people to engage in child molestation. In a 1984 study involving 51 child sexual abusers, 67% of the sample reported making use of "hardcore sexual stimuli". However, the study failed to prove that there was a ] between such type of pornography usage and child sexual abuse.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} Other similar studies have also found a correlation between child molestation and usage of extreme erotic materials, but they did not limit the definition of "pornography" or "hardcore sexual stimuli" to child pornography.<ref name=":10">{{Cite journal |last=Ost |first=Suzanne |date=2002 |title=Children at Risk: Legal and Societal Perceptions of the Potential Threat that the Possession of Child Pornography Poses to Society |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6478.00227 |journal=Journal of Law and Society |language=en |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=436–460 |doi=10.1111/1467-6478.00227 |issn=0263-323X}}</ref> | |||
Some judges have argued that child pornography usage fuels a marketplace of child sexual abuse material, thus creating a financial incentive for its production. Such stance could be challenged by ]'s contention that there is no evidence of a commercially profitable market of child pornography. However, the argument could still be held true if it is proven that those who produce child pornography do so not because of a potential financial benefit, but because they expect others to view the material that they produce.<ref name=":10" /> | |||
] stated in 1990 that, in light of the new 20th century laws regarding child pornography, the very act of speaking of child pornography has intensified its erotic effect, leading to an "eroticization of prohibition".<ref name=":9" /> Another idea relating to the ethics of child pornography states that allowing such materials would lead to children being seen as sexual objects, thus potentially leading adults to commit child sexual abuse.<ref name=":10" /> | |||
=== The Gamer's Dilemma === | |||
The Gamer's Dilemma, conceptualized by researcher Morgan Luck in a 2009 essay, is a moral challenge that contrasts the societal acceptance of acts of virtual murder in videogames and the simultaneous condemnation of virtual acts of child molestation in virtual environments (including in computer-generated child pornography). According to Luck, there is no sound justification for making a distinction between the two actions, and the arguments against virtual acts of child sexual abuse are also valid for virtual acts of murder.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Patridge |first=Stephanie L. |date=2013 |title=Pornography, ethics, and video games |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10676-012-9310-1 |journal=Ethics and Information Technology |language=en |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=25–34 |doi=10.1007/s10676-012-9310-1 |issn=1388-1957}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Coghlan |first1=Thomas |last2=Cox |first2=Damian |date=2023 |title=Between death and suffering: resolving the gamer's dilemma |journal=Ethics and Information Technology |language=en |volume=25 |issue=3 |doi=10.1007/s10676-023-09711-z |issn=1388-1957|doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
Ethicists have devised two main types of answers to the Gamer's Dilemma:<ref name=":11">{{Cite journal |last1=Montefiore |first1=Thomas |last2=Formosa |first2=Paul |date=2022 |title=Resisting the Gamer's Dilemma |journal=Ethics and Information Technology |language=en |volume=24 |issue=3 |doi=10.1007/s10676-022-09655-w |issn=1388-1957|doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
* The first type attempts to solve the challenge by highlighting the moral differences between virtual acts of child sexual abuse and murder, thus concluding that virtual acts of child molestation are often immoral, while simulated acts of murder often aren't.<ref name=":11" /> | |||
* The second attempts to undermine Luck's challenge by either denying that virtual acts of murder are morally permissible, or that virtual acts of child molestation are morally impermissible.<ref name=":11" /> | |||
A study published in 2023 suggested that most of its participants reacted negatively both to depictions of virtual murder and sexual abuse, with sexual abuse triggering significantly more negative reactions than murder.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Formosa |first1=Paul |last2=Montefiore |first2=Thomas |last3=Ghasemi |first3=Omid |last4=McEwan |first4=Mitchell |date=2024-02-17 |title=An empirical investigation of the Gamer's Dilemma: a mixed methods study of whether the dilemma exists |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2178837 |journal=Behaviour & Information Technology |language=en |volume=43 |issue=3 |pages=571–589 |doi=10.1080/0144929X.2023.2178837 |s2cid=256884728 |issn=0144-929X}}</ref> | |||
== Laws == | |||
{{Main|Legality of child pornography}} | |||
===International coordination of law enforcement=== | |||
One of the primary mandates of the international policing organization ] is the prevention of crimes against children involving the crossing of international borders, including child pornography and all other forms of exploitation and trafficking of children.<ref name=interpol1>{{cite web |url=http://www.interpol.int/Public/Children/Default.asp |title=Crimes against children |publisher=Interpol |access-date=1 May 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120514155812/https://www.interpol.int/Public/Children/Default.asp |archive-date=14 May 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name= Bantekas266>{{cite book|title=International Criminal Law 2/E |first=Ilias |last=Bantekas |author2=Susan Nash |year=2003 |publisher=Routledge Cavendish |page=265|isbn=978-1-85941-776-8}}</ref> | |||
===National and international law=== | |||
{{Update|part=section|date=November 2023}} | |||
Child pornography laws provide severe penalties for producers and distributors in almost all societies, usually including incarceration, with shorter duration of sentences for non-commercial distribution depending on the extent and content of the material distributed. Convictions for possessing child pornography also usually include prison sentences, but those sentences are often converted to probation for first-time offenders.<ref name="Akdeniz11" /> | |||
In 2006, the ] (ICMEC) published a report of findings on the presence of child pornography legislation in the then-184 ] member countries. It later updated this information, in subsequent editions, to include 196 UN member countries.<ref name="icmec.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.icmec.org/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_X1&PageId=4346 |title=Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review |publisher=ICMEC |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150415101647/http://www.icmec.org/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_X1&PageId=4346 |archive-date=15 April 2015 }}</ref><ref name="books.google.com">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7VPhAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA63|title=Litigating Transnational Human Rights Obligations: Alternative Judgments|publisher=Routledge |author1=Mark Gibney |author2=Wouter Vandenhole |page=63 |year=2013|isbn=978-1135121051}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C_AF0rzXS9AC&pg=PA20|title=Parents Guide to the Internet|author=Jay LaBonte|publisher=Lulu|pages=20–21|year= 2007|isbn=978-1430307693}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kI51wV4ticIC&pg=PA136|title=Handbook of Digital and Multimedia Forensic Evidence|author=John J. Barbara|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|page=78|year= 2007|isbn= 978-1597455770}}</ref> The report, entitled "Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review", assesses whether national legislation: <blockquote>(1) exists with specific regard to child pornography; (2) provides a definition of child pornography; (3) expressly criminalizes computer-facilitated offenses; (4) criminalizes the knowing possession of child pornography, regardless of intent to distribute; and (5) requires ]s to report suspected child pornography to law enforcement or to some other mandated agency.<ref name="books.google.com"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=08SANTODOMINGO1028|archive-url=https://archive.today/20141130085253/http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=08SANTODOMINGO1028|url-status=dead|archive-date=30 November 2014|title=Icmec Explores Areas of Cooperation With Godr to Combat Child Sexual Exploitation|date=June 25, 2008|author=Embassy Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)|access-date=27 March 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Mx30syIntCYC&pg=PA278|title=Internet Child Pornography and the Law: National and International Responses|author= Yaman Akdeniz|publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.|pages=106, 275, 278, 293|year=2013|isbn=978-1409496076}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
ICMEC stated that it found in its initial report that only 27 countries had legislation needed to deal with child pornography offenses, while 95 countries did not have any legislation that specifically addressed child pornography, making child pornography a global issue worsened by the inadequacies of domestic legislation.<ref>, ICMEC. April 2010.</ref> The 7th Edition Report found that still only 69 countries had legislation needed to deal with child pornography offenses, while 53 did not have any legislation specifically addressing the problem.<ref name="icmec.org"/> Over seven years of research from 2006 to 2012, ICMEC and its Koons Family Institute on International Law and Policy report that they have worked with 100 countries that have revised or put in place new child pornography laws.<ref name=critical>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0ozqAwAAQBAJ&q=icmec+hague&pg=PA82|title=The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis|isbn=978-1782253082|author=Rhona Schuz|publisher=A&C Black|pages=82–83 |date=2014}}</ref><ref name=plan>Permanent Bureau (February 2004), , Hague Conference on Private International Law, Preliminary Document # 14, p. 6</ref><ref name=train>{{cite web|url=http://www.virtualglobaltaskforce.com/2012/icmec-to-train-officers-in-bangkok-september-18-21/|title=ICMEC to Train Officers in Bangkok September 18–21|date=5 September 2012|publisher=Virtual Global Taskforce|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150312134551/http://www.virtualglobaltaskforce.com/2012/icmec-to-train-officers-in-bangkok-september-18-21/|archive-date=12 March 2015|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>The Koons Family Institute on International Law and Policy (2012) {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150608012528/http://polis.osce.org/library/f/4060/3771/GOV-USA-RPT-4060-EN-3771 |date=8 June 2015 }}, 7th Edition</ref> | |||
A 2008 review of child pornography laws in 187 countries by the ] (ICMEC) showed that 93 had no laws that specifically addressed child pornography. Of the 94 that did, 36 did not criminalize possession of child pornography regardless of intent to distribute.<ref>{{cite press release |title=New Study Reveals Child Pornography Not a Crime In Most Countries |publisher=International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children |date= |url=https://www.icmec.org/press/new-study-reveals-child-pornography-not-a-crime-in-most-countries/ |access-date=28 June 2021 |archive-date=10 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210710061715/https://www.icmec.org/press/new-study-reveals-child-pornography-not-a-crime-in-most-countries/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> This review, however, did not count legislation outlawing ''all'' pornography as being "specific" to child pornography. It also did not count bans on "the worst forms of child labor".<ref name="ICMEC CSAM 2018"/> Some societies such as Canada and Australia have laws banning cartoon, manga, or written child pornography and others require ISPs (]) to monitor internet traffic to detect it.<ref name=AFP>{{cite news | |||
|url=http://www.afp.gov.au/media_releases/national/2007/queensland_man_charged_over_sms_child_pornography.html | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070918170717/http://www.afp.gov.au/media_releases/national/2007/queensland_man_charged_over_sms_child_pornography.html | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|archive-date=18 September 2007 | |||
|title=Queensland man charged over SMS child pornography | |||
|date=17 July 2007 | |||
|author=AFP | |||
}}</ref><ref> (4 March 2005, ]). Retrieved 23 June 2008.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9775_2009.html|title=REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9775}}</ref> | |||
The United Nations ] requires parties to outlaw the "producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling or possessing for the above purposes" of child pornography.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.undemocracy.com/A-RES-54-263 |title=Article 3, (1)(c) |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121120154810/http://www.undemocracy.com/A-RES-54-263 |archive-date=20 November 2012 }}</ref> The Council of Europe's ] and the ] Decision that became active in 2006 require signatory or member states to criminalize all aspects of child pornography.<ref name= Akdeniz11/> | |||
==Organizations== | |||
{{Expand section|date=November 2023}} | |||
There are many anti-child pornography organizations, such as the ], ], ], and ].{{Citation needed|date=November 2023}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
<!-- new links in alphabetical order please--> | |||
* ] | |||
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* ] | |||
* |
*] | ||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*]/] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Commons category}} | |||
{{Wikiquote}} | |||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.ncmec.org/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2451 |author=National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (USA) |title=Child Pornography Fact Sheet |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071115225944/http://www.ncmec.org/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2451 |archive-date=15 November 2007 |df=dmy-all }} | |||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/reading_lists/child_abuse_images_and_the_internet_wda65568.html |author=National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (UK) |title=Child abuse images and the internet: A reading list |access-date=13 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120203093949/http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/reading_lists/child_abuse_images_and_the_internet_wda65568.html |archive-date=3 February 2012 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }} | |||
* Oppenheimer, Mark. {{YouTube|_YMDpvJ9xcw|Video of submission to South African parliament on virtual child pornography, Part 1}}. . . . . | |||
* . ]. | |||
{{Sexual ethics}} | |||
{{Sexual abuse}} | |||
{{Pedophilia}} | |||
{{Pornography}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Child Pornography}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 00:17, 26 December 2024
Erotic materials involving minors
Child pornography (also abbreviated as CP, also called child porn, or kiddie porn and child sexual abuse material known by the acronym CSAM, underscoring that children can not be deemed willing participants under law) is erotic material that depicts persons under the designated age of majority. The precise characteristics of what constitutes child pornography varies by criminal jurisdiction.
Child pornography is often produced through online solicitation, coercion and covert photographing. In some cases, sexual abuse (such as forcible rape) is involved during production. Pornographic pictures of minors are also often produced by children and teenagers themselves without the involvement of an adult. Images and videos are collected and shared by online sex offenders.
Laws regarding child pornography generally include sexual images involving prepubescents, pubescent, or post-pubescent minors and computer-generated images that appear to involve them. Most possessors of child pornography who are arrested are found to possess images of prepubescent children; possessors of pornographic images of post-pubescent minors are less likely to be prosecuted, even though those images also fall within the statutes.
Child pornography is illegal and censored in most jurisdictions in the world. Ninety-four of 187 Interpol member states had laws specifically addressing child pornography as of 2008, though this does not include nations that ban all pornography.
Terminology and definitions
The precise definition of the term "child pornography" varies by jurisdictions and there is no consensus in international law regarding the precise meaning of the word.
In the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has defined child pornography as material that "visually depicts sexual conduct by children below a specified age". In Canada, child pornography can also entail depictions of fictional minors. In the United Kingdom, the law does not use the term "child pornography", though it does define a series of illegal sexual materials that are commonly regarded as child pornography. Some English jurisdictions use the COPINE scale to sort potentially sexual media involving minors.
In the 2000s, use of the term child abuse images increased by both scholars and law enforcement personnel because the term "pornography" can carry the inaccurate implication of consent and create distance from the abusive nature of the material. A similar term, child sexual abuse material, is used by some official bodies, and similar terms such as "child abuse material", "documented child sexual abuse", and "depicted child sexual abuse" are also used, as are the acronyms CAM and CAI. The term "child pornography" retains its legal definitions in various jurisdictions, along with related terms such as "indecent photographs of a child" and others. In 2008, the World Congress III against the Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents stated in their formally adopted pact that "Increasingly the term 'child abuse images' is being used to refer to the sexual exploitation of children and adolescents in pornography. This is to reflect the seriousness of the phenomenon and to emphasize that pornographic images of children are in fact records of a crime being committed."
Production
The characteristics of child pornography production cases varies widely. Some materials are produced through coercion, seduction or coaxing. Other erotic images depicting children are photographed covertly (e.g. showering pictures). Violent "hands-on" offenses (such as forcible rape) are rare in criminal cases of child pornography production, instead most of such cases involve online solicitation, the exchange of gifts and promises of romance. In many cases, child pornography is often produced by minors themselves without the participation of an adult.
In April 2018, The Daily Telegraph reported that of the sexually explicit images of children and teenagers (11 to 15 year-olds) found on the Internet, 31% were made by children or teenagers from November 2017 to February 2018, with 40% in December 2017; 349 cases in January 2017 and 1717 in January 2018. The images were made by children or teenagers photographing or filming each other or as selfies, without adults present or coercing, by unwittingly imitating adult pornographic or nude images or videos (including of celebrities) that they had found on the Internet. The report said that sex offenders trawled for and amassed such images.
A 2007 study in Ireland, undertaken by the Garda Síochána, revealed the most serious content in a sample of over 100 cases involving indecent images of children. In 44% of cases, the most serious images depicted nudity or erotic posing, in 7% they depicted sexual activity between children, in 7% they depicted non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children, in 37% they depicted penetrative sexual activity between adults and children, and in 5% they depicted sadism or bestiality. A 2012 study reported that, in a sample of child pornography production arrest cases from 2009, 37% of the reviewed material was adult-produced and 39% was produced by minors with some involvement of an adult; the remaining items were produced by minors only.
Artificially generated or simulated imagery
Main article: Simulated child pornographySimulated child pornography produced without the direct involvement of children in the production process itself includes modified photographs of real children, non-minor teenagers made to look younger (age regression), fully computer-generated imagery, and adults made to look like children.
Sexting and filming among minors
Main article: SextingSexting is sending, receiving, or forwarding sexually explicit messages, photographs, or images, primarily between mobile phones, of oneself to others (such as dating partners or friends). It may also include the use of a computer or any digital device. Such images may be passed along to others or posted on the Internet. In many jurisdictions, the age of consent is lower than the age of majority, and a minor who is over the age of consent can legally have sex with a person of the same age. Many laws on child pornography were passed before cell phone cameras became common among teenagers close in age to or over the age of consent and sexting was understood as a phenomenon. Teenagers who are legally able to consent to sex, but under the age of majority, can be charged with production and distribution of child pornography if they send naked images of themselves to friends or sex partners of the same age. The University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center estimates that 7 percent of people arrested on suspicion of child pornography production in 2009 were teenagers who shared images with peers consensually. Such arrests also include teenage couples or friends with a small age disparity, where one is a legal adult and the other is not. In some countries, mandatory sentencing requires anybody convicted of such an offense to be placed on a sex offender registry.
The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this section, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new section, as appropriate. (November 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Legal professionals and academics have criticized the use of child pornography laws with mandatory punishments against teenagers over the age of consent for sex offenses. Florida cyber crimes defense attorney David S. Seltzer wrote of this that "I do not believe that our child pornography laws were designed for these situations ... A conviction for possession of child pornography in Florida draws up to five years in prison for each picture or video, plus a lifelong requirement to register as a sex offender."
In a 2013 interview, assistant professor of communications at the University of Colorado Denver, Amy Adele Hasinoff, who studies the repercussions of sexting has stated that the "very harsh" child pornography laws are "designed to address adults exploiting children" and should not replace better sex education and consent training for teens. She went on to say, "Sexting is a sex act, and if it's consensual, that's fine ... Anyone who distributes these pictures without consent is doing something malicious and abusive, but child pornography laws are too harsh to address it."
Cybersex trafficking
Main article: Cybersex traffickingChild victims of cybersex trafficking are forced into live streaming, pornographic exploitation on webcam which can be recorded and later sold. Victims are raped by traffickers or coerced to perform sex acts on themselves or other children while being filmed and broadcast in real time. They are frequently forced to watch the paying consumers on shared screens and follow their orders. It occurs in 'cybersex dens', which are rooms equipped with webcams. Overseas predators and pedophiles seek out and pay to watch the victims.
Distribution and receipt
Philip Jenkins notes that there is "overwhelming evidence that is all but impossible to obtain through nonelectronic means." The Internet has radically changed how child pornography is reproduced and disseminated, and, according to the United States Department of Justice, resulted in a massive increase in the "availability, accessibility, and volume of child pornography."
Digital cameras and Internet distribution facilitated by the use of credit cards and the ease of transferring images across national borders has made it easier than ever before for users of child pornography to obtain the photographs and videos.
In 2019, the New York Times reported that child pornography was now a crisis. Tech companies such as Facebook, Microsoft and Dropbox reported over 18 million cases of child sexual abuse material, which includes over 45 million images and videos.
In 2023, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received 36.2 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation, an increase of 12% from 2022.
Offender characteristics
Child pornography offenders are predominantly white, male, aged between 25 and 50 years and, in relation to "hands on" child sex abusers, more likely to be employed. On multiple studies, they have been reported to have higher education at a rate of 30%. Research has also shown that around 50% of child pornography offenders were single either at the time of their offences or after they were prosecuted. Child pornography offenders are also less likely to be parents compared to contact offenders. Scholars have also found that while "hands-on" offenders are relatively likely to transition into pornography offenders (with some admitting to using child pornography as a substitute for committing contact offenses), the opposite is rarely the case.
In a study conducted by Michael Seto in 2010, 33–50% of a sample of child pornography offenders reported having sexual interest in children. Another 2009 study diagnosed 31% of its sample of online child sex offenders with pedophilia. Aside from a predominant sexual interest in children, other reasons for online child pornography offending include indiscriminate sexual interest, pornography addiction and accidental access to child pornography material. Having a history of child pornography offending has been stated by some researchers to be a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia.
A meta-analysis of nine studies conducted by Seto in 2011 reported a sexual recidivism rate of 5% for follow-up periods ranging from one to six years. Another paper published by Seto in 2015 reported a sexual recidivism rate of 11% in a 5-year follow-up period. Research has also shown that offenders that measure high on antisociality and atypical sexual interests are most likely to sexually reoffend. Other studies have also reported rates of recidivism for child pornography offenders that are inferior to those of contact child sex offenders. People who have committed both pornography and contact offences have a higher recidivism rate for contact offences than child pornography offenders.
Relation to child molestation
Main article: Relationship between child pornography and child sexual abuseExperts differ over any causal link between child pornography and child sexual abuse, with some experts saying that it increases the risk of child sexual abuse, and others saying that use of child pornography reduces the risk of offending. A 2008 American review of the use of Internet communication to lure children outlines the possible links to actual behaviour regarding the effects of Internet child pornography.
According to one paper from the Mayo Clinic based on case reports of those under treatment, 30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child. As the total number of those who view such images can not be ascertained, the ratio of passive viewing to molestation remains unknown. The report also notes that it is difficult to define the progression from computerized child pornography to physical acts against children. Several professors of psychology state that memories of child abuse are maintained as long as visual records exist, are accessed, and are "exploited perversely."
A study by Wolak, Finkelhor, and Mitchell states that:
ates of child sexual abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds to the spread of CP online. ... The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes in investigatory or statistical procedures. ... o date, there has not been a spike in the rate of child sexual abuse that corresponds with the apparent expansion of online CP.
Ethics
The study of the ethics regarding child pornography has been greatly neglected among academics. Feminist writer Susan Cole has argued that the absence of ethical literature regarding the topic can be explained by the simplicity of the matter, given that "there a general consensus about the harm involved" in this type of material.
Some scholars have argued that the possession of child pornography is immoral because it would validate the act of child sexual abuse or actively encourage people to engage in child molestation. In a 1984 study involving 51 child sexual abusers, 67% of the sample reported making use of "hardcore sexual stimuli". However, the study failed to prove that there was a causal relationship between such type of pornography usage and child sexual abuse. Other similar studies have also found a correlation between child molestation and usage of extreme erotic materials, but they did not limit the definition of "pornography" or "hardcore sexual stimuli" to child pornography.
Some judges have argued that child pornography usage fuels a marketplace of child sexual abuse material, thus creating a financial incentive for its production. Such stance could be challenged by Anne Higonnet's contention that there is no evidence of a commercially profitable market of child pornography. However, the argument could still be held true if it is proven that those who produce child pornography do so not because of a potential financial benefit, but because they expect others to view the material that they produce.
Judith Butler stated in 1990 that, in light of the new 20th century laws regarding child pornography, the very act of speaking of child pornography has intensified its erotic effect, leading to an "eroticization of prohibition". Another idea relating to the ethics of child pornography states that allowing such materials would lead to children being seen as sexual objects, thus potentially leading adults to commit child sexual abuse.
The Gamer's Dilemma
The Gamer's Dilemma, conceptualized by researcher Morgan Luck in a 2009 essay, is a moral challenge that contrasts the societal acceptance of acts of virtual murder in videogames and the simultaneous condemnation of virtual acts of child molestation in virtual environments (including in computer-generated child pornography). According to Luck, there is no sound justification for making a distinction between the two actions, and the arguments against virtual acts of child sexual abuse are also valid for virtual acts of murder.
Ethicists have devised two main types of answers to the Gamer's Dilemma:
- The first type attempts to solve the challenge by highlighting the moral differences between virtual acts of child sexual abuse and murder, thus concluding that virtual acts of child molestation are often immoral, while simulated acts of murder often aren't.
- The second attempts to undermine Luck's challenge by either denying that virtual acts of murder are morally permissible, or that virtual acts of child molestation are morally impermissible.
A study published in 2023 suggested that most of its participants reacted negatively both to depictions of virtual murder and sexual abuse, with sexual abuse triggering significantly more negative reactions than murder.
Laws
Main article: Legality of child pornographyInternational coordination of law enforcement
One of the primary mandates of the international policing organization Interpol is the prevention of crimes against children involving the crossing of international borders, including child pornography and all other forms of exploitation and trafficking of children.
National and international law
This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2023) |
Child pornography laws provide severe penalties for producers and distributors in almost all societies, usually including incarceration, with shorter duration of sentences for non-commercial distribution depending on the extent and content of the material distributed. Convictions for possessing child pornography also usually include prison sentences, but those sentences are often converted to probation for first-time offenders.
In 2006, the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (ICMEC) published a report of findings on the presence of child pornography legislation in the then-184 INTERPOL member countries. It later updated this information, in subsequent editions, to include 196 UN member countries. The report, entitled "Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review", assesses whether national legislation:
(1) exists with specific regard to child pornography; (2) provides a definition of child pornography; (3) expressly criminalizes computer-facilitated offenses; (4) criminalizes the knowing possession of child pornography, regardless of intent to distribute; and (5) requires ISPs to report suspected child pornography to law enforcement or to some other mandated agency.
ICMEC stated that it found in its initial report that only 27 countries had legislation needed to deal with child pornography offenses, while 95 countries did not have any legislation that specifically addressed child pornography, making child pornography a global issue worsened by the inadequacies of domestic legislation. The 7th Edition Report found that still only 69 countries had legislation needed to deal with child pornography offenses, while 53 did not have any legislation specifically addressing the problem. Over seven years of research from 2006 to 2012, ICMEC and its Koons Family Institute on International Law and Policy report that they have worked with 100 countries that have revised or put in place new child pornography laws.
A 2008 review of child pornography laws in 187 countries by the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (ICMEC) showed that 93 had no laws that specifically addressed child pornography. Of the 94 that did, 36 did not criminalize possession of child pornography regardless of intent to distribute. This review, however, did not count legislation outlawing all pornography as being "specific" to child pornography. It also did not count bans on "the worst forms of child labor". Some societies such as Canada and Australia have laws banning cartoon, manga, or written child pornography and others require ISPs (Internet Service Providers) to monitor internet traffic to detect it.
The United Nations Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography requires parties to outlaw the "producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling or possessing for the above purposes" of child pornography. The Council of Europe's Cybercrime Convention and the EU Framework Decision that became active in 2006 require signatory or member states to criminalize all aspects of child pornography.
Organizations
This section needs expansion. You can help by making an edit requestadding to it . (November 2023) |
There are many anti-child pornography organizations, such as the Financial Coalition Against Child Pornography, Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection, ECPAT International, and International Justice Mission.
See also
- Child erotica
- Commercial sexual exploitation of children
- Debate regarding child pornography laws
- Depictions of youth
- Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors
- Lolicon/Shotacon
- Mobile Alliance Against Child Sexual Abuse Content
- Prevention Project Dunkelfeld
- Child prostitution
- Protect (political organization)
- Virtuous Pedophiles
- Relationship between child pornography and child sexual abuse
References
- Lee, Hee-Eun; Ermakova, Tatiana; Ververis, Vasilis; Fabian, Benjamin (September 2020). "Detecting child sexual abuse material: A comprehensive survey". Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation. 34: 301022. doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.301022. S2CID 225487613.
- ^ "Online child sexual abuse material". ReportCyber | Cyber.gov.au. 23 December 2015. Archived from the original on 1 August 2018.
- Keane, Sean (30 July 2024). "'Betrayal: A Father's Secret' documents the dark truth that shatters a family". ABC News. Archived from the original on 26 August 2024. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
We don't use that term, child pornography… n adult pornography, those are willing participants who are consenting to that act. With child pornography, a child cannot consent.
- ^ Ly, Thanh; Dwyer, R. Gregg; Fedoroff, J. Paul (2018). "Characteristics and treatment of internet child pornography offenders". Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 36 (2): 216–234. doi:10.1002/bsl.2340. ISSN 0735-3936. PMID 29659072.
Most studies do not provide an explicit definition of child pornography. Instead, it seems that the definition largely depends on what the law defines as child pornography. Because of this, the definition of child pornography can change based on the laws that govern the land in which an individual is found guilty. Most of the studies in this article define child pornography as stimuli that are sexual in nature that include persons under the age of 18.
- ^ Gillespie, Alisdair A. (2018). "Child pornography". Information & Communications Technology Law. 27 (1): 30–54. doi:10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932. ISSN 1360-0834. S2CID 261771447.
There is no single definition of 'child pornography' and indeed the term itself remains controversial... The difficulty with this is that there are hundreds of many different definitions available. Even international law cannot agree...
- ^ Wells, Melissa; Finkelhor, David; Wolak, Janis; Mitchell, Kimberly J. (July 2007). "Defining Child Pornography: Law Enforcement Dilemmas in Investigations of Internet Child Pornography Possession 1" (PDF). Police Practice and Research. 8 (3): 269–282. doi:10.1080/15614260701450765. S2CID 10876828. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2018 – via University of New Hampshire.
- ^ Child Sexual Abuse Material: Model Legislation & Global Review (9th ed.). International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children. 2018.
- "World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children". 27 July 2002. Archived from the original on 16 March 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
- Malamuth, Neil M. (2018). ""Adding fuel to the fire"? Does exposure to non-consenting adult or to child pornography increase risk of sexual aggression?". Aggression and Violent Behavior. 41: 74–89. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.013. S2CID 149279109.
- New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 764 (1982).
- ^ Seto, Michael C.; Eke, Angela W. (2015). "Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT)". Law and Human Behavior. 39 (4): 416–429. doi:10.1037/lhb0000128. ISSN 1573-661X. PMID 25844514.
- Gillespie, Alisdair A. (2 January 2018). "Child pornography". Information & Communications Technology Law. 27 (1): 30–54. doi:10.1080/13600834.2017.1393932. ISSN 1360-0834. S2CID 261771447.
- Taylor, Max.; Holland, Gemma; Quayle, Ethel (2001). "Typology of Paedophile Picture Collections". The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles. 74 (2): 97–107. doi:10.1177/0032258X0107400202. ISSN 0032-258X. S2CID 148756344.
- ^ Akdeniz, Yaman (2008). Internet child pornography and the law: national and international responses. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-7546-2297-0.
- ^ Wortley, Richard; Stephen Smallbone (2006). Situational Prevention Of Child Sexual Abuse, Volume 19 of Crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-1-881798-61-3.
- ^ Sanderson, Christiane (2004). The seduction of children: empowering parents and teachers to protect children from child sexual abuse. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-84310-248-9.
- ^ "Blocking access to child abuse material – Terminology". INTERPOL. Archived from the original on 8 October 2010.
- "NSPCC Policy Summary – Child Abuse Images" (PDF). National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, London, UK. April 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2011.
- "Access blocking / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL". Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
- "Industry Reporting of Child Sexual Abuse Material - Europol". Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
- Quayle, Ethel (September 2008). "The COPINE Project". Irish Probation Journal. 5. ISSN 1649-6396.
- Mathew, Lina A. "Online Child Safety from Sexual Abuse in India". Journal of Information, Law & Technology. 2009 (1): 21.
- ^ Wolak, Janis (2012). "Trends in Arrests for Child Pornography Production: The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3)". Crimes Against Children Research Center.
- Rudgard, Olivia. "Children's own 'sex selfies' fuelling rise in child abuse images". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2018.
- The Daily Telegraph, Wednesday 18 April 2018, page 1 (bottom right corner) and page 2.
- Claire Milner, Ian O'Donnel (2007). Child Pornography: Crime, computers and society. Willan Publishing. p. 123. ISBN 978-1-84392-357-2.
- Virtueel filmpje geldt ook als porno, AD, 11 March 2008
- Paul, Bryant; Linz, Daniel G. (February 2008). "The Effects of Exposure to Virtual Child Pornography on Viewer Cognitions and Attitudes Toward Deviant Sexual Behavior" (PDF). Communication Research. 35 (1): 3–38. doi:10.1177/0093650207309359. S2CID 10679425. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008 – via Department of Communication - University of California, Santa Barbara.
- Salter, Michael (2013). "Beyond Criminalisation and Responsibilitisim Sexting, Gender and Young People". Sydney Law School. 24: 310–315.
- "Sexting teens can go too far - 12/14/08 - Philadelphia News - 6abc.com". Abclocal.go.com. 14 December 2008. Archived from the original on 31 January 2010. Retrieved 16 October 2009.
- ^ Wolak, Janis; Finkelhor, David; Mitchell, Kimberly (April 2012). "Trends in Arrests for Child Pornography Production: The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3)". Crimes Against Children Research Center. Durham, NH.
- ^ Feyerick, Deborah; Steffen, Sheila. "'Sexting' lands teen on sex offender list - CNN.com". CNN's American Morning. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
- ^ Brady, Nicole (23 July 2011). "'Sexting' youths placed on sex offenders register". Retrieved 29 September 2016.
- Cyber Crime Lawyer Blog: Miami Criminal Defense Lawyer Archived 1 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine, December 2008
- Seidman, Karen. "Child pornography laws 'too harsh' to deal with minors sexting photos without consent, experts say". National Post News – Canada. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
- Brown, Rick; Napier, Sarah; Smith, Russell G (2020), Australians who view live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of financial transactions, Australian Institute of Criminology, ISBN 9781925304336 pp. 1–4.
- Carback, Joshua T. (2018). "Cybersex Trafficking: Toward a More Effective Prosecutorial Response". Criminal Law Bulletin. 54 (1): 64–183. SSRN 3171275.
- "Philippine children exploited in billion-dollar webcam paedophilia industry". The Sydney Morning Herald. 8 July 2014.
- "6 Iligan kids rescued from cybersex den". Philippine News Agency. 13 January 2019.
- "Philippines Makes More Child Cybersex Crime Arrests, Rescues". VOA. 12 May 2017.
- "First paedophile in NSW charged with cybersex trafficking". the Daily Telegraph. 27 March 2017.
- "Study on the Effects of New Information Technologies on the Abuse and Exploitation of Children" (PDF). UNODC. 2015.
- ^ "Cyber-sex trafficking: A 21st century scourge". CNN. 18 July 2013.
- "International Efforts by Police Leadership to Combat Human Trafficking". FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 8 June 2016.
- "Philippines targets cybersex trafficking but young victims are often left in limbo". South China Morning Post. 6 May 2019.
- "Cheap tech and widespread internet access fuel rise in cybersex trafficking". NBC News. 30 June 2018.
- "Surge in online sex trade of children challenges anti-slavery campaigners". Reuters. 1 December 2016.
- Jenkins, Philip (2005). "Law Enforcement Efforts Against Child Pornography Are Ineffective". In Lewis, Angela (ed.). At Issue: Child Sexual Abuse. San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press. ISBN 978-1565106888.
- Child Pornography Archived 6 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Child Exploitation and Obscenity, Department of Justice
- "Child porn among fastest growing internet businesses". National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, USA. 5 August 2005. Archived from the original on 18 October 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
- Keller, Michael H.; Dance, Gabriel J. X. (28 September 2019). "The Internet Is Overrun With Images of Child Sexual Abuse. What Went Wrong?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
- "CyberTipline Data". National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
- Houtepen, Jenny A.B.M.; Sijtsema, Jelle J.; Bogaerts, Stefan (2014). "From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risks for cross-over". Aggression and Violent Behavior. 19 (5): 466–473. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.011.
- ^ Ly, Thanh; Dwyer, R. Gregg; Fedoroff, J. Paul (March 2018). "Characteristics and treatment of internet child pornography offenders". Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 36 (2): 216–234. doi:10.1002/bsl.2340. ISSN 0735-3936. PMID 29659072.
- ^ Babchishin, Kelly M.; Hanson, R. Karl; VanZuylen, Heather (2015). "Online Child Pornography Offenders are Different: A Meta-analysis of the Characteristics of Online and Offline Sex Offenders Against Children". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 44 (1): 45–66. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x. ISSN 0004-0002. PMID 24627189. S2CID 254251866.
- Carr, John (2004). "Child abuse, child pornography and the internet: Executive summary". NCH (1).
- "Child porn consumers safe from prosecution in the Czech Republic". Radio.cz. 9 February 2007. Retrieved 16 October 2009.
- Diamond, Milton. The Effects of Pornography: an international perspective, Pacific Center for Sex and Society", University of Hawai’i, 4 October 2009. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- Wolak, Janis; Finkelhor, David; Mitchell, Kimberly J.; Ybarra, Michele L. (2008). "Online 'predators' and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment". American Psychologist. 63 (2): 111–128. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.362.8143. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.111. PMID 18284279.
- Hall, Ryan C.W.; Hall, Richard C.W. (April 2007). "A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues" (PDF). Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 82 (4): 457–471. doi:10.4065/82.4.457. PMID 17418075. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 March 2017 – via Dr. Ryan Hall.
- Wortley, Richard; Stephen Smallbone. "Child Pornography on the Internet". Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. 41: 17.
The children portrayed in child pornography are first victimized when their abuse is perpetrated and recorded. They are further victimized each time that record is accessed.
- Sheldon, Kerry; Dennis Howitt (2007). Sex Offenders and the Internet. John Wiley and Sons. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-470-02800-1.
...supplying the material to meet this demand results in the further abuse of children Pictures, films and videos function as a permanent record of the original sexual abuse. Consequently, memories of the trauma and abuse are maintained as long as the record exists. Victims filmed and photographed many years ago will nevertheless be aware throughout their lifetimes that their childhood victimization continues to be exploited perversely.
- Wolak, Janis; Finkelhor, David; Mitchell, Kimberly (March 2011). "Child Pornography Possessors: Trends in Offender and Case Characteristics". Sexual Abuse. 23 (1): 22–42. doi:10.1177/1079063210372143. PMID 21349830. S2CID 14088692.
- ^ Bray, Abigail (2011). "Merciless Doctrines: Child Pornography, Censorship, and Late Capitalism". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 37 (1): 133–158. doi:10.1086/660178. ISSN 0097-9740. S2CID 146765015.
- King, Peter J. (2008). "No Plaything: Ethical Issues Concerning Child-pornography". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 11 (3): 327–345. doi:10.1007/s10677-007-9095-1. ISSN 1386-2820.
- ^ Ost, Suzanne (2002). "Children at Risk: Legal and Societal Perceptions of the Potential Threat that the Possession of Child Pornography Poses to Society". Journal of Law and Society. 29 (3): 436–460. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00227. ISSN 0263-323X.
- Patridge, Stephanie L. (2013). "Pornography, ethics, and video games". Ethics and Information Technology. 15 (1): 25–34. doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9310-1. ISSN 1388-1957.
- Coghlan, Thomas; Cox, Damian (2023). "Between death and suffering: resolving the gamer's dilemma". Ethics and Information Technology. 25 (3). doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09711-z. ISSN 1388-1957.
- ^ Montefiore, Thomas; Formosa, Paul (2022). "Resisting the Gamer's Dilemma". Ethics and Information Technology. 24 (3). doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09655-w. ISSN 1388-1957.
- Formosa, Paul; Montefiore, Thomas; Ghasemi, Omid; McEwan, Mitchell (17 February 2024). "An empirical investigation of the Gamer's Dilemma: a mixed methods study of whether the dilemma exists". Behaviour & Information Technology. 43 (3): 571–589. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2023.2178837. ISSN 0144-929X. S2CID 256884728.
- "Crimes against children". Interpol. Archived from the original on 14 May 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2008.
- Bantekas, Ilias; Susan Nash (2003). International Criminal Law 2/E. Routledge Cavendish. p. 265. ISBN 978-1-85941-776-8.
- ^ "Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review". ICMEC. Archived from the original on 15 April 2015.
- ^ Mark Gibney; Wouter Vandenhole (2013). Litigating Transnational Human Rights Obligations: Alternative Judgments. Routledge. p. 63. ISBN 978-1135121051.
- Jay LaBonte (2007). Parents Guide to the Internet. Lulu. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-1430307693.
- John J. Barbara (2007). Handbook of Digital and Multimedia Forensic Evidence. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 78. ISBN 978-1597455770.
- Embassy Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) (25 June 2008). "Icmec Explores Areas of Cooperation With Godr to Combat Child Sexual Exploitation". Archived from the original on 30 November 2014. Retrieved 27 March 2015.
- Yaman Akdeniz (2013). Internet Child Pornography and the Law: National and International Responses. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 106, 275, 278, 293. ISBN 978-1409496076.
- "Model Legislation Update: Since the Beginning", ICMEC. April 2010.
- Rhona Schuz (2014). The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis. A&C Black. pp. 82–83. ISBN 978-1782253082.
- Permanent Bureau (February 2004), "Strategic Plan Update, submitted by the Permanent Bureau", Hague Conference on Private International Law, Preliminary Document # 14, p. 6
- "ICMEC to Train Officers in Bangkok September 18–21". Virtual Global Taskforce. 5 September 2012. Archived from the original on 12 March 2015.
- The Koons Family Institute on International Law and Policy (2012) "Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review" Archived 8 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 7th Edition
- "New Study Reveals Child Pornography Not a Crime In Most Countries" (Press release). International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children. Archived from the original on 10 July 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
- AFP (17 July 2007). "Queensland man charged over SMS child pornography". Archived from the original on 18 September 2007.
- Canadian Arrested for Importing Loli-porn Manga (4 March 2005, Anime News Network). Retrieved 23 June 2008.
- "REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9775".
- "Article 3, (1)(c)". Archived from the original on 20 November 2012.
External links
- National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (USA). "Child Pornography Fact Sheet". Archived from the original on 15 November 2007.
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (UK). "Child abuse images and the internet: A reading list". Archived from the original on 3 February 2012. Retrieved 13 November 2009.
- Oppenheimer, Mark. Video of submission to South African parliament on virtual child pornography, Part 1 on YouTube. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4. Part 5.
- Child Pornography Case Results in Lengthy Prison Sentences. FBI.
Sexual ethics | |
---|---|
Human sexuality | |
Child sexuality | |
Sexual abuse | |
Age of consent (reform) | |
Sexual abuse | |
---|---|
Forms | |
Sociological theories | |
Laws | |
Related topics | |
Pornography | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pornography |
| ||||||||
Opposition to pornography |
| ||||||||
Views | |||||||||
Media | |||||||||
Possible effects | |||||||||
People | |||||||||
Events | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | |||||||||
See also |
| ||||||||