| Revision as of 11:50, 14 June 2007 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits →[]: keep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:04, 22 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''speedy deleted''' by ] at author's request. ] 16:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| Attack page ] 01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | Attack page ] 01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 4: | Line 10: | ||
| * '''Speedy keep'''. The nomination is baseless. ] 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''Speedy keep'''. The nomination is baseless. ] 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::* Upon deeply pondering on the issue, and getting advice from my socks -- both the left one and the right one --, as well as other stakeholders that will not be disclosed at this time, I have determined that to keep a compendium of weird misthoughts in such a respectable and well-accessible place as ] is undesirable. Specifically, it gives these delusions an undeserved ] of respectability. It may also aid ] in organising his thoughts, which is certainly a dangerous perspective. Consequently, I have demolished<sup></sup> the compendium into an ] that will be discreetly disclosed on a ] basis. This renders the current discussion ]. ] 12:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::* I would also like to point out that the consensus to keep is clear, well illustrating the baselessness of the original nomination. ] 12:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''keep'''. Perhaps Digwuren sould rename it, i.e remove Petri Krohn from title. The satirical piece, however, should remain until mr. Krohn's campaign is allowed to continue.] 07:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''keep'''. Perhaps Digwuren sould rename it, i.e remove Petri Krohn from title. The satirical piece, however, should remain until mr. Krohn's campaign is allowed to continue.] 07:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :* The satire part of it is actually not my primary intent. The project began many weeks ago, in the ] controversy, to provide a thorough and systematic view into ]'s ideas regarding Estonia and History of Estonia. It only seems satirical because the views are so skewed. | :* The satire part of it is actually not my primary intent. The project began many weeks ago, in the ] controversy, to provide a thorough and systematic view into ]'s ideas regarding Estonia and History of Estonia. It only seems satirical because the views are so skewed. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 17: | ||
| * '''keep''' The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--] 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''keep''' The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--] 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. ] 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. ] 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about ], preferrably starting a separate page. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about ], preferrably starting a separate page about this clinical case of anti-Estonianness or whatever. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :* You have not displayed enough weird beliefs to warrant a full article about them, so I lack sufficient data. I'm afraid you're going to have to write your article yourself if you don't want to share your glory. ] 11:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Comment''' Petri Krohn has his own interesting page ] which is in my opinion even worse.--] 23:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - it's clearly an attack page; it relates a version of events, ascribed to another user, which is then mocked for being wildly inaccurate. It's not a ] compilation of any sort of evidence, and is quite plainly a ] on ]. A compilation of evidence page, as Petri Krohn has, is acceptable -- this kind of editorializing personal attack on another user is totally unacceptable. --] 00:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Wtf, send this crap to mediation'''. ] ''and'' this. -] 01:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Keep'''. Pages about user's conduct are helpfull. Those can be used in future dispute resolutions.--] 02:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', this is an attack page. ] ] 23:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:04, 22 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Mallanox at author's request. Resurgent insurgent 16:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
User:Digwuren/Petri Krohn's Story of Estonians
Attack page Alex Bakharev 01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- There's nothing attacky with such a compilation. You don't see me going around and tagging things such as User:Petri Krohn/Evidence for deletion. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The nomination is baseless. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Upon deeply pondering on the issue, and getting advice from my socks -- both the left one and the right one --, as well as other stakeholders that will not be disclosed at this time, I have determined that to keep a compendium of weird misthoughts in such a respectable and well-accessible place as Misplaced Pages is undesirable. Specifically, it gives these delusions an undeserved aura of respectability. It may also aid Petri Krohn in organising his thoughts, which is certainly a dangerous perspective. Consequently, I have demolished the compendium into an undisclosed location that will be discreetly disclosed on a need-to-know basis. This renders the current discussion moot. Digwuren 12:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would also like to point out that the consensus to keep is clear, well illustrating the baselessness of the original nomination. Digwuren 12:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- keep. Perhaps Digwuren sould rename it, i.e remove Petri Krohn from title. The satirical piece, however, should remain until mr. Krohn's campaign is allowed to continue.E.J. 07:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- The satire part of it is actually not my primary intent. The project began many weeks ago, in the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn controversy, to provide a thorough and systematic view into Petri Krohn's ideas regarding Estonia and History of Estonia. It only seems satirical because the views are so skewed.
- I wouldn't mind extending the scope further, to include ideas of Roobit and Ghirlandajo, actually. They appear to be reasonably mutually consistent, and skewed in the similar manner. Digwuren 09:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- keep The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--Alexia Death 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. Suva 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about Ghirlandajo's Story of Estonians, preferrably starting a separate page about this clinical case of anti-Estonianness or whatever. --Ghirla 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- You have not displayed enough weird beliefs to warrant a full article about them, so I lack sufficient data. I'm afraid you're going to have to write your article yourself if you don't want to share your glory. Digwuren 11:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Petri Krohn has his own interesting page User:Petri Krohn/Evidence which is in my opinion even worse.--Staberinde 23:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - it's clearly an attack page; it relates a version of events, ascribed to another user, which is then mocked for being wildly inaccurate. It's not a good faith compilation of any sort of evidence, and is quite plainly a personal attack on Petri Krohn. A compilation of evidence page, as Petri Krohn has, is acceptable -- this kind of editorializing personal attack on another user is totally unacceptable. --Haemo 00:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wtf, send this crap to mediation. Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Petri Krohn/Evidence and this. -N 01:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Pages about user's conduct are helpfull. Those can be used in future dispute resolutions.--MariusM 02:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, this is an attack page. Neil ╦ 23:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.