| Revision as of 15:37, 21 June 2007 view sourceJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,071 edits down to semi← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:12, 17 January 2009 view source NawlinWiki (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators221,643 editsm Protected User talk:ColScott: Page-move vandalism ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (38 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Note== | |||
| I've protected this page to prevent its use as a soapbox by a blocked user to make personal attacks against other editors, including those with personally identifiable info. Also, the users legal threats and incitement to fabricate false evidence for use in a legal suit on his BBS bring the user block directly into ] territory. Do not unblock or unprotect without corresponding w/ the blocking admin and/or posting to AN/I first. ]</small> (]) 17:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Hello ColScott. I noticed you removed the thread from your website, for which I thank you. I'd just like to clarify here: you are not banned, you are blocked. There is a difference, though it's not always easy to see: a block that nobody will undo is eventually a ban, so it's a difference that makes no difference at some level. Getting from here to anywhere good is going to take UN-level diplomacy though. I hope to hear from you by mail. Best, <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I have reduced this page to semi-protection so ColScott can note some issues I believe he has with the article ]. Please don't reprotect unless there is a pressing problem with attacks, as ColScott has no other obvious way to communicate these issues. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 17 January 2009
Redirect to: