Revision as of 19:40, 21 June 2007 edit24.86.172.27 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:25, 5 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,336,403 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Languages}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
Is LPI a scam? |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Languages}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
== Major revert == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have reverted a substantial amount of content on this page added by {{user|Lpi-english}} and an IP user from Vancouver, BC that was an unencyclopedic, uncited, POV essay. Please do not re-add without citations from ]. <span style="color:#808080">]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">]</span></sup> 14:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
It is not a government endorsed test, it is unregulated, and not used by all Post-Secondary Institute. |
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's not. ] 07:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh really! Who gives them the right to judge rather a student is proficient or not? |
|