Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Lorna Nogueira/vote3: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion | Lorna Nogueira Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:22, 22 May 2005 editXezbeth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators282,561 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:37, 4 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(49 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.<br>
The result of the debate was '''No consensus''', so keep. ] (] 08:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
The contents of the deletion debate have been removed as they relate to a living person. A record of the deletion debate can be found in the deletion history.
This page should be deleted because as ] states the votes were counted wrong and the person who the page was written about is no-notable and has even contacted Misplaced Pages expressing that she should not be included because of this. ] 18:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
#VfD is not about vote-counting &mdash; read ]: "The purpose of the discussion is to achieve consensus upon a course of action. The votes are a means to gauge consensus, and not the ends in themselves (])."
#She didn't say that she ''shouldn't'' be included, only that she wouldn't mind if editors did delete the article on her.
#Her point wasn't based on a technicality of the voting system.
#This article has survived two VfDs this year, the last less than two months ago. What's going on here? is there something personal in the air? ] (] 18:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
* I closed ]. The statement that is was closed wrong is a result of ]'s belief that a 2:1 ratio of votes to delete should result in an article's deletion. For the purpose of closing VfDs, I do not accept that 2:1 constitutes a rough consensus, so I closed the listing--and other votes with similar results--with no consensus. --]|] 19:58, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' since it's been kept twice recently. ] 19:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
*While this VfD is too soon after the last one, '''Delete''' as non-notable. She only gets 167 google hits, none of the "films" she's been in are notable, and her fellow "actors" have for the most part been deleted already. &mdash;] 20:22, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:37, 4 May 2022

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Lorna Nogueira

The contents of the deletion debate have been removed as they relate to a living person. A record of the deletion debate can be found in the deletion history.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.