| Revision as of 16:32, 29 June 2007 editALM scientist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,390 edits →[] Warning: careful← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:19, 23 January 2021 edit undoDreamy Jazz Bot (talk | contribs)Bots106,824 edits Adding Template:Bots and excluding this page from mass messages as this user is vanished. (Task 5 - BRFA - report errors here) | ||
| (218 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> | |||
| *] | |||
| {{bots|deny=all|optout=MassMessage}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> ] 16:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Steven Weinstock == | |||
| The article ] has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the ], articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to ] any ]. | |||
| Please ], and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-deletion --> --] 11:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Please == | |||
| Please see my note at ]. Thanks. ←] <sup>]]</sup> 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| You're likely to be blocked soon for violating our 3RR policy, which says that editors may not revert more than three times in 24 hours. Please review it carefully at ]. Many thanks, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 22:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == You have been blocked == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:]|on ''']'''|}}. In the future, please solve editing disputes through discussion rather than ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|] 23:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)}}</div> ] 23:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This block is totally unjustified.I have been added a section and important one that show the criticisms of Jew watch and that have been erased. {{unsigned|Oren.tal}} | |||
| :: If you are really serious about participating in the project, may I suggest you spend some time learning about ] and improving your English (maybe get a ]). ←] <sup>]]</sup> 23:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You were warned about the three-revert rule, and then you just went ahead and reverted anyway. If you'd stopped after being warned, I'd have been hesitant to block you; since you continued, I had no hesitation about it. ] 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The blocked have used has a weapons to force opinion of you on other. | |||
| I will complain about your policy.You should not use in the block as a weapons to force opinion but only against vandalism.I have not erased any part of this article but just add an important information that you have erased.Shame on you.You should not be administrator at all. | |||
| *Read ] until you understand it. ''Any'' of us would have been blocked for the same behaviour. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I mention true fact that the website quote the protocol and it was proved faked by the London time. | |||
| Moreover you used the blocked as weapons in order to totally erase the criticisms.If you were honset you would have write your own version.but you did not. | |||
| Instead you have used in blocking as a weapons. | |||
| *Hi. I've blocked the accounts you created to evade the 3RR block you were serving. Please do not do that again. Thank you. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Moon God == | |||
| Thanks for your note where I have replied now. This moon god stuff is something which is really needed in Islam related articles. I'm sure there are many reliable sources that we can find for this. --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 21:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Oren, thanks for your reply! Well yes, I also feel the moon god stuff should be mentioned. I mean the biggest thing is that Islam's symbol is the crescent moon. Criticism of Islam has been slow to seep into Misplaced Pages for many reasons, mostly because people wont agree with our viewpoints but slowly things are getting better. Just see if you can find a university professor, or a news website or a book that talks about this moon god stuff and then like other statements, just put it in and reference it like the others. People said that the bibleprobe.com is not a reliable source, they may be right. A reliable source is one that comes from established sources of information (see ] for more info). The way you can go about this is, search e.g. "moon god islam" in Google and Google books or Scholars and you might find some sources talking about it. Let me know if you find a source that you think was reliable but was removed by other people. You'll find lots of people who might oppose your changes and then let me know and I'll support you if the source is pretty reliable. Just stay free from blocks, 3rr, personal attacks, sock puppets and use the article's talk page and you should be safe. I hope you can find a good RS now for that moon god stuff, that will be a great addition to Islam related articles. I'm sure someone has said something about it somewhere. --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == soapboxing == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages {{#if:Talk:Criticism of the Qur'an| such as ]}} are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> ] 21:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :please stop misusing talk pages to propagate your own personal viewpoints. see ], and ]. if you have any real suggestion concerning how to improve the article, you may do it without the spamming. ] 21:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are making the arguments yourself there. All we do is report on the arguments made by reliable sources. ] 09:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> → ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> — 16:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :'''No'''.I am not part of any edit war.I removed the link to wikipedia.However as for the other link they are fine. | |||
| == ] Warning == | |||
| You have already violated ] on ] article. Please stop now. If you continue then I will report you and you might be blocked. regards. --- ] 16:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:19, 23 January 2021
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)