Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Feddhicks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:36, 4 July 2007 editFeddhicks (talk | contribs)200 edits RFCU to prove my innocence  Latest revision as of 21:30, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on ] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
=== ] === === ] ===
{{checkuser requests to be listed}}
{{rfcu box|case=Feddhicks|filed=19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)}} {{rfcu box|case=Feddhicks|filed=19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|Feddhicks}} * {{checkuser|Feddhicks}}
Line 13: Line 22:


Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) ] 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) ] 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
:{{delisted}} enwp checkuser policy states that we can't use checkuser to prove one's innocence. -- ] ] 15:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
::Question, do you think we could have it be a code F since Dereks1x is banned, or is that not possible? <span style="font-family:comic sans ms;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 22:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:30, 10 February 2023

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Feddhicks}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Feddhicks

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


  • Code letter: Prove my innocence

This checkuser is to prove my innocence. Bobblehead accused me of being a sock of this Derek guy ] because I thought that a controversial real estate dealing about Barack Obama should be a one sentence, neutral comment in the article instead of putting it in very small fine print hidden in the footnotes. (Some others wanted a full blown description as shown in archive 8).

Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) Feddhicks 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

 Delisted enwp checkuser policy states that we can't use checkuser to prove one's innocence. -- lucasbfr 15:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Question, do you think we could have it be a code F since Dereks1x is banned, or is that not possible? Kwsn 22:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.