Revision as of 14:50, 6 July 2007 editEquerer (talk | contribs)7 edits revert unexplained edit... not a vote...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:51, 12 June 2022 edit undoMz7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators77,526 edits remove outdated text about role in renaming | ||
(46 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{align|center|style=margin-left:1em| | |||
⚫ | {{shortcut| |
||
<inputbox> | |||
] are administrators with the additional ability to make other users admins or bureaucrats, based on community decisions reached here. They can also ] of any user and can set bot status on an account. | |||
type=fulltext | |||
width=30 | |||
prefix=Misplaced Pages:Requests for bureaucratship | |||
architectural=Search RfB | |||
</inputbox>}} | |||
⚫ | {{shortcut|WP:RFB}} | ||
'''Requests for bureaucratship''' ('''RfB''') is the process by which the ] decides who will become ]. Bureaucrats can make other users administrators or bureaucrats, based on community decisions reached here, and remove administrator rights in ]. They can also grant or remove ] on an account. | |||
⚫ | The process for bureaucrats is similar to that for adminship above; however the expectation for promotion to bureaucratship is significantly higher than for admin, |
||
⚫ | The process for bureaucrats is similar to that for adminship above; however the expectation for promotion to bureaucratship is significantly higher than for admin, requiring a clearer consensus. In general, the threshold for consensus is somewhere around 85%. Bureaucrats are expected to determine consensus in difficult cases and be ready to explain their decisions. | ||
⚫ | Create a new RfB page as you would for an RfA, and insert |
||
⚫ | Create a new RfB page as you would for an RfA, and insert {{pre|{{tls|RfB|User{{=}}{{var|Username}}|Description{{=}}{{var|Your description of the candidate.}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}}} into it, then answer the questions. New bureaucrats are recorded at ]. Failed nominations are at ]. | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | At minimum, study what is expected of a bureaucrat by reading discussions at ] including the recent archives, ''before'' seeking this position. | ||
While ] for support is frowned upon (to the extent that canvassing editors have had their RfBs fail), some users find it helpful to place <tt>{{tl|Rfb-notice}}</tt> on their userpages. Such declarations are most definitely allowed. | |||
While ] for support is often viewed negatively by the community, some users find it helpful to place the neutrally worded {{tlx|RfX-notice|b}} on their userpages – this is generally not seen as canvassing. Like requests for adminship, requests for bureaucratship are advertised on the watchlist and on ]. | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | {{em|Please add new requests at the top of the section immediately below this line.}}<noinclude> | ||
]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 19:51, 12 June 2022
ShortcutRequests for bureaucratship (RfB) is the process by which the Misplaced Pages community decides who will become bureaucrats. Bureaucrats can make other users administrators or bureaucrats, based on community decisions reached here, and remove administrator rights in limited circumstances. They can also grant or remove bot status on an account.
The process for bureaucrats is similar to that for adminship above; however the expectation for promotion to bureaucratship is significantly higher than for admin, requiring a clearer consensus. In general, the threshold for consensus is somewhere around 85%. Bureaucrats are expected to determine consensus in difficult cases and be ready to explain their decisions.
Create a new RfB page as you would for an RfA, and insert
{{subst:RfB|User=Username|Description=Your description of the candidate. ~~~~}}
into it, then answer the questions. New bureaucrats are recorded at Misplaced Pages:Successful bureaucratship candidacies. Failed nominations are at Misplaced Pages:Unsuccessful bureaucratship candidacies.
At minimum, study what is expected of a bureaucrat by reading discussions at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship including the recent archives, before seeking this position.
While canvassing for support is often viewed negatively by the community, some users find it helpful to place the neutrally worded {{RfX-notice|b}}
on their userpages – this is generally not seen as canvassing. Like requests for adminship, requests for bureaucratship are advertised on the watchlist and on Template:Centralized discussion.
Please add new requests at the top of the section immediately below this line.
Category: