| Revision as of 11:24, 7 July 2007 view sourceGrimbergfriend (talk | contribs)39 edits →Inappropriate speedy deletion tagging of images← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:13, 30 April 2024 view source Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,081 edits +pp | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp|small=y}} | |||
| <div class="usermessage"><div style="text-align:center;" class="plainlinks">If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page.<br>If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I'll watch your page and reply when able.</div></div> | |||
| {{retired}} | |||
| {{message|User:Videmus Omnia}} | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: LightBlue;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Videmus Omnia/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! align="center" | ]<br />] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| # ] | |||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of Brad Baldwin== | |||
| == Don't take it personally... == | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>Fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more rigorous, no other indication of notability</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| ...but you should seriously get a life. If you just keep following me around and looking up Non-free content criteria crap, and then nominating my pictures for deletion, then there is something wrong with you. Have a nice day. --'''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> ]] </font face="Comic Sans MS">''' | |||
| :Um, not following you around. You have a nice day too. ] 12:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Its just that you've been tagging a lot of my pictures lately. --'''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> ]] </font face="Comic Sans MS">''' | |||
| :::I went back and reviewed - I think it's because I went through the non-free media used in the ] article and the various articles for the series' characters to ensure we had good fair-use rationales. I certainly wasn't intending to stalk you in particular. ] 12:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 20:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Trying to avoid "spam" == | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi - | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 09:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| An editor called Montco gave me your name and asked me to connect with you. We have a series of audiocasts, each of which briefly covers a telecommunications term or concept. It was recommended we link these into the relevant pages on Misplaced Pages. When I did so, they were removed for "COI" and "SPAM" reasons. Having reviewed your policies, I believe it was the fact that I linked to our blog page where there is a flash player to play them (instead of the audio file itself), and that the audio file has an intro and trailer that identify our company and invite registration to our blog and podcast series. | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| If we were to create audio files that excluded these promotions, and we linked the audio files directly (instead of the blog), would this still be consider spam/COI? If you want to see examples of the audio files I'm talking about, you can find them at podsnacks.com. | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| {{center|'''''This image is abusive, not neutral, and not educational.'''''}} | |||
| Thanks | |||
| {{Quote box | |||
| | quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ]. | |||
| | source = Thank you. | |||
| | width = 20% | |||
| | align = right | |||
| }} | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-reason --> ] (]) 08:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] 3:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll check it out later today - thanks for getting in touch with me. ] 13:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == a loss == | |||
| == COI tag on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) == | |||
| I have you to ]. — ''']''' <sup>|''' ]'''</sup> | 07:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| We were having some trouble with the inventor of AHP Thomas Saaty {{TSaaty}} and his wife {{RozannSaaty}} deleting criticisms to AHP and replacing it with advertising. The current version is not so much where the COI lies but in the changes the Saaty's have been making. I was looking for an appropriate tag but I guess I missed the mark by puting a vandalism warning tag on the article itself. I removed your tag because the current version is the one that existed before the COI problems. I'm open to any advice on better ways of addressing this. Thanks. ] 13:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Just watchlist the article and report any new problems at ], like you already have. The administrators who frequent that board will warn and/or block should that become necessary. I left a 'uw-coi' message on the talk pages of the editors involved also. ] 13:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks again. I'll do that.] 13:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ==Use of ] in ]== | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| ] is disputing the removal of ] from the article ]. If you would like to comment please do so at ] so we can get a broader opinion of whether use of the image in this article meets ]. -Thanks ] ] 14:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| I've been on Misplaced Pages for 5 years, and have received plenty of both honors and criticisms. But never until today have I received a barnstar for my comments on a touchy subject, from someone who disagreed with me. That shows character. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 18:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :My pleasure! And thanks for the compliment... ] 18:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion== | |||
| Hello, Videmus Omnia. Could you please stop tagging images for speedy deletion because they lack a fair use rationale? Tagging these images with <nowiki>{{no rationale|month=June|day=25|year=2007}}</nowiki> places the image in a category such as ]. Tagging them for speedy deletion is redundant and merely clogs ] with hundreds of images; an admin will clear the dated categories after 7 days. These deletions were put on hold until July 1, 2007, which has caused a backlog, but they have resumed. Thanks, - ] ] 20:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. ] 20:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG listed for deletion == | |||
| == Scalzi == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 21:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Images lacking a description== | |||
| Wow, that was fast! I can't tell a lie, I knowingly and willingly made a change on Scalzi's page that was false. Scalzi is a jerk and treated Quatloo like crap (http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Fred_Saberhagen) when Quatloo wouldn't accept his unverified source on Saberhagen's death, I wanted to give him a taste of his own medicine and maybe teach him why Misplaced Pages is so strict about verified sources. It was probably immature and undoubtedly wrong and is the only time I ever have or will do something like that, I'm really a good Wikier I swear :)] 20:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Apology accepted, but please don't do that anymore, thanks. Things like this cause Misplaced Pages to get bad press (remember ]?) ] 20:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| There is absolutely no copyright issue on the ], which was rewritten in its entirety, with all necessary independent sources provided. The only apparent "copyright issue" is the fact that a release of any of the earlier material no longer present on the article. If there any genuine copyright violations, please specify them on the talk page, as required by Misplaced Pages policy. ] 01:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| :Actually, the discussion is at ], as stated in the template on the article page. Although it has been reworked, much of the copyvio text remains. I understand there's an assertion of permission, I'm just saying it needs to be verified via ]. ] 01:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == model for fair use rationale for record albums == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] 15:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I added a fair use rationale to ] You may wish to add a similar fair use rationale to any other album images that are missing one. --] 02:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| == Scalzi again == | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| WTF you edited the TALK PAGE? I brought up a valid point. It wasn't a personal attack, it was the truth, and it was a valid subject of discussion for people who might try to work on his page in the future.] 03:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| :Look, I'm not on any particular side, but the talk page is ], not the subject of the article. Please take your battle off-wiki, it doesn't belong here. ] 03:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| :: Well, I did take it elsewhere, he just started censoring that elsewhere. I guess I could start a whole new site devoted to preserving the discussion he chooses to delete and thereby ensure that my side is heard, but I'm not that into helping his career. Anyway, sorry you're in the middle of this. I appreciate your lack of partisanship.] 03:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| ::: And by that I mean I won't mess with his pages anymore. Might egg his house though :P] 03:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : |
--] (]) 08:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Porn Star == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 15:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Inappropriate speedy deletion tagging of images == | |||
| == Nomination for merging of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 11:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. | |||
| This post is in relation to your speedy deletion tagging of the following images: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| And possibly many more. | |||
| I'd like to make two points about your actions: | |||
| # I think you are being very over-zealous in tagging these fair use images. It was very clear from the pages that use them, that they were being used in the correct manner. Technically the image pages did not contain a specific rationale for their use on each specific article, but rather than tagging them for speedy deletion you should have added that rationale yourself (as I have done). All you needed to do was copy'n'paste the rationale from a similar image page and edit it accordingly. Simply tagging them for deletion instead of fixing the oversight yourself is somewhat irresponsible. | |||
| # As has already been pointed out on your Talk page, it is inappropriate and somewhat disruptive to tag images for speedy deletion because they lack a fair use rationale. Fair use images without an obvious rationale should be tagged as {{]}} instead (not as well as). Tagging them for speedy deletion is redundant and merely clogs ] with hundreds of images. If you are using a bot to add these speedy tags, please either modify the bot or stop using it. | |||
| —] 09:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::First, I'm disappointed with your use of the terms "inappropriate", "over-zealous", "irresponsible" and "disruptive" above, I ask you to voluntarily withdraw them. Any actions I took were in line with ]. So far as album cover rationales go, a) it's not my responsibility, but the uploader's, and b) I understand I'm probably in a minority opinion on this, but personally I believe that 99% of the album cover images on Misplaced Pages are merely decorative and don't contribute to the understanding of the subject in a way words cannot. An exception would be if the article actually contains commentary about the album artwork that the reader can't understand without an image. They're also probably the most abused non-free images on Misplaced Pages, being frequently used to illustrate not only the album, but articles on the various songs, the band itself, and discography lists, normally without any rationales for the various specific articles per ]c. For example, see the non-free image gallery on ], which is not justified by any rationale and is likely a violation of content policy. | |||
| ::That said, I don't feel strongly enough about this to actively go out and seek deletion of every album cover image. If the uploader has at least attempted to justify inclusion per ], I generally leave it alone. But I'm not going to add rationales for images I don't feel are needed, especially when the uploaders have ignored obvious instructions that the rationales are required. | |||
| ::I get what you're saying about the redundant tags - until I got the message above, I didn't realize how gigantic the 'no rationale' backlog was. But I haven't put any more of those images into ] since I saw that, even though what I was doing was in line with policy. It was obviously annoying deleting admins, so I knocked it off. And no, I'm not using any bot. ] 13:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::The comments by gorgan_almighty seem to me exactly right. To reply by saying that you are just following policy (as you say elsewhere on this page) is like saying "I am only following orders". You are clearly violating the SPIRIT of Misplaced Pages by not adding the obviously-relevant rationale tags, which would be constructive and take just as much effort as adding all those destructive speedy-delete tags. These actions of yours are essentially acts of vandalism, no matter how much you try to justify them by saying that you are following policy. You are not contributing to Misplaced Pages. You are damaging Misplaced Pages by using the letter of "policy" to violate the spirit behind the policy. Please stop. ] 11:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm sorry, but did you create your user account ? And honestly, ]. The real damage to Misplaced Pages comes from users who added copyrighted material without fulfilling the legal requirements to protect the Foundation from claims of copyright infringement. ] 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::First, no one called you a Nazi, as far as I can remember; they called you a legalistic vandal, which is a very diffferent thing. Besides, your justification for your tagging is completely spurious: Misplaced Pages is not subject to legal sanctions simply because tags are missing on images that are in fact covered by fair use. No one can sue over the lack of a tag - only over actual violations. You keep tagging images that are not legally liable in any way whatever, and the legal status of which is not even remotely affected by the presence or absence of a tag. An image that is obviously covered under fair use (and which you could easily have labeled as such) is not legally liable because it lacks a tag labeling it as fair use. Again, your justification of vandalism is legally and morally spurious in every way, and it doesn't get any less spurious because you keep repeating it. And I notice that you've also used the completely diffferent justification that you think some images are merely decorative - which has nothing to do with legal liability. Now please just stop. ] 11:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Issue with Jam155.jpg == | |||
| This is about ]....I added both fair use rationale on page and also my reasons in favor of in non-content free criteria. I hope that meets your criteria posted in my talk page | |||
| ] 18:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi - FYI, we don't normally accept this type of image on Misplaced Pages per the ], ], because this individual is presumably still living and someone could make a free image of him. Are there any special cirumstances that apply here (i.e. some reason no free image can be made)? ] 00:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome, and thank you for contributing to Misplaced Pages. An image you have uploaded{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Image:Kelli Maroney.JPG|, ],}} was marked as having been released {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{license|}}}|{{{license}}}|under a free license}} by the copyright holder, but no evidence of this release has been provided. If notice of the release is on the copyright holder's website, please link to it in the image summary. If the release is a response to a ], the full request and response must be ]. If you need help in composing a request, the ] may be helpful. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- uw-imagepermission --> ] 10:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The permission was forwarded to ]. ] 10:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tags == | |||
| PLease note ] for use on film images and ] for deceased people after 1923. Thanks ] <sup>]]</sup> 14:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah - didn't know about those templates. Thanks! ] 14:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 30 April 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.
Proposed deletion of Brad Baldwin
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brad Baldwin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more rigorous, no other indication of notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Nikita Devine
I have nominated Nikita Devine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nikita Devine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
This image is abusive, not neutral, and not educational.Thank you.You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Q0k (talk) 08:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
a loss
I have added you to Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. — pd_THOR | 07:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Keeani Lei
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Keeani Lei. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Keeani Lei. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bazonka (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Images lacking a description
Category:Images lacking a description, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Talk:Patrick Sherrill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Patrick Sherrill is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Talk:Patrick Sherrill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 15:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Porn Star
Template:Porn Star has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JudeccaXIII (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Add-desc-S
Template:Add-desc-S has been nominated for merging with Template:Add-desc-I. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)