Revision as of 18:24, 8 July 2007 editEep² (talk | contribs)7,014 edits links |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 19 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,505,701 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Disambiguation}} |
|
|
}} |
|
==links== |
|
==links== |
|
Look at ] and you'll see it deals with ''alternative'' energy, not ''renewable'' energy. ] is more relevant than ]. Also, again, the relevant info about Jain ''symbols'' is on ], ''not'' ] (which people can learn more about from a link on "Jain Symbols". Quit being difficult. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
Look at ] and you'll see it deals with ''alternative'' energy, not ''renewable'' energy. ] is more relevant than ]. Also, again, the relevant info about Jain ''symbols'' is on ], ''not'' ] (which people can learn more about from a link on "Jain Symbols". Quit being difficult. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Sort of. When words like ''infinite energy'' is thrown about in reference to energy sources it's in a far more sci-fi context than ] (which Alternative energy redirects too). The most relevant wikipedia artile I can think of for this topic is currently ], although this is very POV. ] 01:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: The subject of the magazine is not relevant: this page is about disambiguating the ambiguous title "infinite energy". Who is going to confuse "infinite energy" and ]? |
|
|
: You are correct that the relevant info about Jain symbols is on ], and ''that's exactly why'' "Anant Virya" should direct the reader to ]: it's not a symbol, but a general concept in the religion. Doing contrariwise is like referring "Holy Spirit" to ] only because there happens to be a symbol for it. --] 10:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC) |