User:Janet1983: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:34, 10 July 2007 editMainstream astronomy (talk \| contribs)77 edits →Questions for Evolutionists ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 06:36, 7 February 2024 edit undoJackofOz (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers208,045 edits →My WikiFauna Character
(177 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiOgre}}
	]
			<br>
			{{userpage}}
			==Language-wise==
			{\| class="wikitable" border="1"
			\|-
			\| {{user de}}
			\| {{user simple}}
			\|-
			\| {{user en-5}}
			\| {{user ksh-3}}
			\|}

			==Information on me==
	<br />
	"Evolutionism is a religious world view that is not supported by science, Scripture, popular opinion, or common sense. The exclusive teaching of this dangerous, mind-altering philosophy in tax supported schools, parks, museums, etc. is a clear violation of the First Amendment."<br />


			{\| class="wikitable" border="1"
	==Questions for Evolutionists==
			\|-
	#Where did the space for the universe come from?
			! Misplaced Pages
	#*] comes from its own ].
			! My positions
	#Where did matter come from?
			! More positions
	#*] comes from other forms of ] per ]
			\|-
	#Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?
			\| {{Novice Editor Userbox}}
	#*]s do not originate from anywhere, they are simply descriptions of the universe.
			\| {{Template:User atheist}}
	#How did matter get so perfectly organised?
			\| {{User citizen United States}}
	#*It isn't ]
			\|-
	#Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
			\| {{Burba Userbox}}
	#*] and especially reheating.
			\| {{User:Disavian/Userboxes/Separation}}
	#When, where, why, and how did life come from non-living matter?
			\| {{User:Heuh0/Userboxes/WoD}}
	#*] occurred on the Earth some 3 to 4 billion years ago.
			\|-
	#When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
			\| {{Template:User wikien}}
	#*] is a fundamental aspect of chemistry.
			\| {{Template: User reason}}
	#With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
			\| {{User:Disavian/Userboxes/Queer Rights}}
	#*Another cell with which ] was already happening.
			\|-
	#Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of its kind since this would only make more mouths to feed and decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to survive, or the species? How do you explain the origin of?)
			\| {{User WikiProject Spam}}
	#*]. ] is a well-understood science.
			\| {{User:Queerly Bohemian/Userboxes/ProScience}}
	#How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties?
			\| {{User:UBX/White nationalism foe}}
	#*Through ].
			\|-
	#Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove that they had a common designer instead of a common ancestor?
			\| {{Template:User wikide}}
	#*Depends on what you mean by "designer". ] is what drives the "design" of life.
			\| {{User:Lord Marcellus/Userboxes/Evolution}}
	#Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occurred if evolution were true?
			\| {{User:UBX/Neofascism foe}}
	#*The first sentence is untrue. Increasing complexity can arise through a number of mechanisms that are too numerous to outline here, but are outlined elsewhere:
			\|-
	#When, where, why and how did
			\| {{Template:User wikipedia/Pages needing translation into English}}
	##single-celled plants become multi-celled?
			\| {{User rationalist}}
	##*At about the ]
			\| {{User:UBX/Racism foe}}
	##two and three-celled intermediates evolve?
			\|-
	##*At about the ] with ]
			\| {{Translator\|de\|German}}
	##single-celled animals evolve?
			\| {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User skeptic}}
	##*In the ].
			\| {{User:UBX/Trump resister}}
	##fish change to amphibians?
			\|-
	##*]
			\| {{User:DanielZimmerman/Template AntiNotable}}
	##amphibians change to reptiles?
			\| {{User climate change}}
	##*]
			\| {{Template:User Democratic Party}}
	##reptiles change to birds (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!)
			\|-
	##*]
			\| {{User WikiProject Feminism}}
	##intermediate forms live?
			\| {{User:Life in General/Userboxes/Refugees}}
	##*Such as the ones listed above?
			\| {{User:Sefringle/Pro-Choice}}
	#When, where, why, how and from what did
			\|-
	##whales evolve?
			\| {{Template:User Wiki age}}
	##*]
			\| {{User Black Lives}}
	##sea horses evolve?
			\| {{User:Resplendent/BC}}
	##*
			\|-
	##bats evolve?
			\| {{User Copy Edit}}
	##*]
			\| {{User Reason}}
	##eyes evolve?
			\| {{User:William Pembroke/Userboxes/Stem Cell Support}}
	##*]
			\|-
	##ears evolve?
			\| {{User:Will Pittenger/User Boxes/Edit Count Usefulness}}
	##*
			\| {{User Science}}
	##Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
			\| {{User:Toa Nidhiki05/Userboxes/DP0}}
	##*
			\|-
	#Which evolved first (how, and how long, did it work without the others?)
			\| {{User:Lawilkin/UBX/WPC}}
	##The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body's resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.?)
			\| {{User Facts}}
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
			\| {{User:CL8/Userboxes/Gun}}
	##The drive to reproduce or the ability to reproduce?
			\|-
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
			\| {{userWPA2}}
	##The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
			\| {{User:Life in General/Userboxes/FreeEducation}}
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
			\| {{User:Life in General/Userboxes/Separation}}
	##DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
			\|-
	##*] has it that RNA came first.
			\|
	##The termite or the flagellates in its intestines that actually digests the cellulose?
			\| {{User:KPalicz/YouthRights}}
	##*Simultaneous, symbiotic evolution.
			\| {{User:Zimbabwe is Mine/Userboxes/Sweatshops}}
	##The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants?
			\|-
	##*Simultaneous, symbiotic evolution.
			\| {{Template:User TooManyUserboxes}}
	##The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones?
			\| {{User:LightSpectra/Userboxes/UHC}}
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
			\| {{User:RadicalTwo/UBX Design/AntiNuke}}
	##The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system?
			\|}
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
	##The immune system or the need for it?
	##*Simultaneous evolution.
	#There are many thousands of examples of symbiosis that defy an evolutionary explanation. Why must we teach students that evolution is the only explanation for these relationships?
	#*Because, in point of fact, there are no examples of symbiosis that defy an evolutionary explanation.
	#How would evolution explain mimicry? Did the plants and animals develop mimicry be chance, by their intelligent choice, or by design?
	#*]. Plants and animals that appear to be like something else or are camoflauged are given a niche advantage over those that do not.
	#When, where, why and how did man evolve feelings? Love, mercy, guilt, etc. would never evolve in the theory of evolution.
	#*] is the study of this.
	#How did photosynthesis evolve?
	#*Through the evolution of ]s mostly.
	#How did thought evolve?
	#*As a ] mechanism.
	#How did flowering plants evolve and from what?
	#*]
	#What kind of evolutionist are you? Why are you not one of the other eight or ten kinds?
	#*Why do you think there are ten kinds?
	#What would you have said 75 years ago if I had told you I had a living coelacanth in my aquarium?
	#*I would have been ].
	#Is there one clear prediction of macroevolution that has proved true?
	#*
	#What is so scientific of the idea of hydrogen gas becoming human?
	#*It takes billions of years.
	#Do you honestly believe that everything came from nothing?
	#*The idea of ''nothing'' is subjective. For example, a ] does not contain nothing.
	<br /><br /><br />
	After you answer the previous questions, please look carefully at your answers and thoughtfully consider the following.
	#Are you sure your answers are reasonable, right, and scientifically provable, or do you just believe that it may have happened the way you answered?
	#*Yes.
	#Do your answers show more or less faith than the person who says, "God must have designed it"?
	#*Less.
	#Is it possible that an unseen Creator designed this universe? If God is excluded at the beginning of the discussion by your definition of science, how could it be shown that HE did create the universe if He did?
	#*People believe in a creator guide and accept scientific explanations all the time. See ].
	#Is it wise and fair to present the theory of evolution to students as fact since over 90% of the population believe God created the universe?
	#*Yes, see the answer above.
	#What is the end result of a belief in evolution (lifestyle, society, attitude about others, eternal destiny, etc.)?
	#*Evolultion has helped us understand biology better and has enabled us to develop drugs and treatments that have improved our lives.
	#Do people accept evolution because of the following factors:
	##It is all they have been taught?
	##*Some, perhaps, but hopefully most people ask questions and learn for themselves.
	##They like the freedom from God (no moral absolutes, etc.)?
	##*Some, perhaps, but that doesn't make evolution less true.
	##They are compelled to support the theory for fear of losing their job, peer status or grade point average?
	##*Some, perhaps, but that doesn't make evolution less true.
	##They are too proud to admit they are wrong?
	##*Some people are too proud to admit they are wrong. Luckily, being wrong in science is no problem: that's the way science progresses.
	##Evolution is the only philosophy that can be used to justify their political agenda?
	##*Some perhaps, but that doesn't make evolution less true.
	#Should we continue to use outdated, disproved, questionable, or inconclusive evidences to support the theory of evolution because we don't have a suitable substitute (Piltdown man, recapitulation, archaeopteryx, Lucy, Java man, Neanderthal man, horse evolution, vestigial organs, etc.)?
	#*Piltdown man is no longer taught. The rest of your examples are neither outdated, disproved, questionable, nor inconclusive.
	#Should parents be allowed to require that evolution not be taught as fact in their school systems unless equal time is given to other theories of origins (like divine creation)?
	#*No. Parents who argue like this do not have the scientific credentials to make this kind of decision about the content of science classes.
	#What are you risking if you are wrong?
	#*Not much. It's okay to be wrong in science.
	#Why are so many evolutionists afraid of the idea of creationism being presented in public schools? If we are not supposed to teach religion in schools, then why not get evolution out of the textbooks? It is just a religious worldview.
	#*Creationism is the religious doctrine of one particular group of people. It is based on faith in a particular literal interpretation of certain ancient texts. This is not science. Evolution is observed to happen and is not subject to the interpretation of a small selection of ancient texts. Evolution is no more a religion than any other part of science.
	#Aren't you tired of faith in a system that cannot be true? Wouldn't it be great to know the God who made you, and to accept His love and forgiveness?
	#*Evolution is true in that it has been observed. People accept God and evolution simultaneously too: see ].
	#Would you be interested to see from the Bible how to have your sins forgiven and how to know for sure that you are going to heaven?
	#*Not particularly, but that is a different subject.

			==Random Interests==
			{\| class="wikitable" border="1"
			\|-
			\| {{Template:User sleep}}
			\| {{User:Lighthead/Religion-4}}
			\| {{User:UBX/Bible Reader}}
			\|-
			\| {{User:J.P.Lon/Userboxes/Loves Knowledge}}
			\| {{User:UBX/singing}}
			\| {{User:Strdst grl/ubx/Auschwitz}}
			\|-
			\| {{Template:User breast cancer}}
			\| <div style="float: left; border:solid black 1px; margin: 1px;">
			{\| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: white;"
			\| style="width: 55px; height: 50px; background: white; text-align: center" \| ]
			\| style="font-size: {{{info-s\|8}}}pt; background: #49D; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc\|white}}};" \| <center>This user practices ''']'''.
			\|}
			\|}
			</div>
			<br>
			<br>

			==Service Award Progress==
	===External Links===
			{{Service award progress\|year=2006\|month=03\|day=19\|edits=821}}
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*
	*

			<br>
	--Janet1983 {{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}
			<br>
			Official Count:
			https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=Janet1983
			<br>

			==My WikiFauna Character==
			{{User wikipedia/WikiOgre}}<br><br><br>
			"A WikiOgre or WikiOgress is an editor who goes for long stretches making few or no edits, but for short periods of time and in brief spats makes large edits, complete rewrites, or even new articles. The WikiOgre may otherwise make minor edits, such as copyediting or vandalism reversion, over the course of everyday perusal. He only goes looking for trouble when his schedule isn’t full and something has ignited the passion to edit.<br>
			In other words, every once in a while the WikiOgre goes on a rampage, but most of the time he just sits around in his cave and eats the random passerby.<br>
			It has been shown that, due to their generally uninvolved Misplaced Pages life, WikiOgres are easily offended and may take long WikiBreaks to recover."
			<br>

	<!--Categories-->
	]
	]


	<!--Other languages-->
			]
	]
			]
	]
			]
	]
			]
	]
			]
	]
			]
	]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]
			]

			]

Latest revision as of 06:36, 7 February 2024

Misplaced Pages editor

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janet1983.

Language-wise

Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.

simple

This person reads, writes and understands Simple English.

en-5

This user can contribute with a professional level of English.

ksh-3

Dä Medmaacher schwaadt en Sprooch vum Rhing wie jeck.

Information on me

Misplaced Pages

My positions

More positions

This editor is a Novice Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Per the userbox migration, {{User atheist}} was moved to {{User:Sangsangaplaz/Userboxes/User atheist}}.

This user is a citizen of the United States of America.

This editor is a Burba and is entitled to display this First Book of Misplaced Pages.

This user believes in the separation of church and state.

This user recognizes that the War on Drugs is racially motivated.

I support the English language Misplaced Pages with my contributions.

This user values reason
over faith.

This user supports equal rights for queer people.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Spam.

This user believes science, practiced through the scientific method, is the
most reliable way of determining the
nature of reality.

This user ardently opposes all forms of racial nationalism.

Misplaced Pages
Ich schreibe Beiträge für die deutschsprachige Misplaced Pages.

I support German language Misplaced Pages with my contributions.

This user is interested in and studies the theory of evolution.

This user ardently opposes the rise of neo-fascism.

This user participates in Pages needing translation into English.

This user is a rationalist.

This user ardently opposes all forms of RACISM.

This user is a translator from German to English on Misplaced Pages:Translation.

This user is a skeptic.

This user is a United States
WOMAN RESISTER

This user rejects using notability as an inclusion criterion on Misplaced Pages.

This user promotes efforts to counter
climate change

This user supports the Democratic Party.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Feminism.

This user supports "illegal immigrants" and the right to travel freely upon the planet we share.

PC	This user is pro-choice.

18Y

This Wikipedian joined Misplaced Pages on March 19, 2006 (18 years, 9 months, 2 weeks and 2 days ago).

This user knows that
Black Lives Matter.

This user believes contraceptives should be freely available to everyone.

This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.

This user knows that
Reason Matters.

This user supports stem cell research.

This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Misplaced Pages.

This user knows that
Science Matters.

This user opposes the death penalty in all cases.

WPC

This user will get around to being a member of the Wikipedian Procrastination Club

This user knows that
Facts Matter

This user is in favor of gun control.

This user is a member of
WikiProject Atheism.

This user believes the world would be a better place if everyone had access to a quality free education.

This user believes religion should have no role to play in politics.

This user supports youth rights.

This user believes that sweatshops in poor countries do more harm than good.

Oh no: this user has way too many userboxes.

This user supports
universal health care.

This user wishes humans would just get rid of their overly destructive weapons.

Random Interests

This user likes to sleep.

Rel-4

This user is an expert in Religious and/or Spiritual studies. This person may very well have a job in one of the said fields.

This user is a Bible reader.

This user loves knowledge.

This user enjoys singing.

This user has been to Auschwitz concentration camp and will never forget what happened there.

This user supports the fight against breast cancer.

This user practices Krav Maga.

Service Award Progress

Currently, this editor has earned the Novice Editor service award.

To get to the next level, Apprentice Editor, they need to meet the editing requirement.Progress towards the next level (by edits):

77.6% completed

Official Count: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=Janet1983

My WikiFauna Character

This user is a WikiOgre.

"A WikiOgre or WikiOgress is an editor who goes for long stretches making few or no edits, but for short periods of time and in brief spats makes large edits, complete rewrites, or even new articles. The WikiOgre may otherwise make minor edits, such as copyediting or vandalism reversion, over the course of everyday perusal. He only goes looking for trouble when his schedule isn’t full and something has ignited the passion to edit.
In other words, every once in a while the WikiOgre goes on a rampage, but most of the time he just sits around in his cave and eats the random passerby.
It has been shown that, due to their generally uninvolved Misplaced Pages life, WikiOgres are easily offended and may take long WikiBreaks to recover."

Categories: