Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rex Germanus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:04, 10 July 2007 editRex Germanus (talk | contribs)11,278 edits Blocked for 2 weeks← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:30, 25 March 2024 edit undoJustlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators120,798 edits Notification: proposed deletion of File:Influencegraph.PNG.Tag: Twinkle 
(454 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
<inputbox>
|-
type=comment
|align="center"|]
bgcolor=#f8fcff
|align="left" width="100%"|'''This user has lost faith in ''the project'' and left ]'''.
default=User talk:Rex Germanus
|}
buttonlabel=New message here!
</inputbox>


{{archive box|
: <sup>]</sup>
: <sup>]</sup>
: <sup>]</sup>
: <sup>]</sup>
: <sup>]</sup>}}


{{Quote|Misplaced Pages is no longer about who is right or wrong. It's not about ]ing, referencing and accepting one was wrong. It's about ], ] and ].


It's better to stop editing when getting one, because no one is going to take you seriously. You're branded. Admins will ignore you, make offensive remarks and will reward the ones who provoke you. You're an outcast, no matter how good and well-sourced your edits are. I refuse to accept that.


I've loved editing Misplaced Pages. With over 8500 edits, dozens of articles and media to show for it, but enough is enough. I demand to be treated as a human being and I will not lower myself anymore. Enough is enough.


I'm leaving Misplaced Pages, standing by every edit I ever made here wether on an article or on a talk page, and denying the admins the pleasure of banning me.|Rex}}
'''Thanks for visiting my talk page.''' If you post here, '''<font color="red">I will reply here</font>''' so the conversations don't get dis-jointed. If I have posted to your talk page, feel free to post your replies there.




{{Quote|Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.|]}}


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


{{Quote|Wie een hond wil slaan, vindt licht een stok.|].}}
:'''They found their sticks.''' ] (]) 16:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


=='''Comments:'''== ==Community ban==
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{reason|}}}|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->
::'''...'''


See ]. - ] <sup>]</sup> 17:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


{{admin|Angusmclellan}} has removed your name from that list. The statement there formerly said:
== RE: ==


<blockquote>
Done, if you don't mind check this , Antman tries to use his logic that Bohemia was in fact Germany accroding HRE. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 13:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
;{{vandal-s|Rex Germanus}}, ], ]: for repeated edit warring, ], ], and use of IP ] to evade scrutiny and editing restrictions. Fifteen prior blocks failed to change the behavior.
:Thanks and I'll check it out.] 14:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
</blockquote>
==Tsja==
Sincerely - ] <sup>]</sup> 11:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Rex volgens mij is het niet de bedoeling dat je commentaar van anderen van je talk-page afhaalt; zelfs niet als je ze uit de tent proberen te lokken. De opmerkingen zojuist geplaatst zijn heel subtiel om elke vorm van belediging (een reden voor verwijdering) te voorkomen. Er zijn mensen die dat soort edits als een soort vandalisme beschouwen. Laat je niet uitlokken, een nieuwe blok ligt wel heel erg makkelijk in de buurt gezien je recente verleden, gewoon negeren dan houdt het vanzelf op. PS Je mag deze opmerking wat mij betreft direct verwijderen als jou dat beter uitkomt bijvoorbeeld in relatie tot slapende honder wakker maken, ook de reden om dit in het Nederlands te schrijven (Removal of this message is explicitly allowed by the original editors of this message) ] 18:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


:Please note that you remain indefinitely blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. You will remain blocked for ninety days at least. At the end of that period, you may contact me by email to discuss whether, and under what restrictions, you might be permitted to resume editing with this account. Any decision to unblock you would be subject to Jehochman's veto. Any violation of the terms that may be agreed would result in immediate indefinite blocking. ] ] 11:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
:Just for the record: as far as I'm concerned, you can remove Antman's messages as much as you like, and I'll also ask him to refrain from posting here as long as he hasn't something really important and constructive to say. At the same time, I'll remind you that if you want to stand any chance of actually keeping the articles the way you want them, you'd better seek constructive discussion with everybody involved. -- ] ] 18:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


::I will support any reasonable terms proposed by Angusmclellan. - ] <sup>]</sup> 12:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Ik heb Antman dat ik hem niet om mijn talk-page wil zien. Elke vorm van communicatie gaat gebeuren op de talk-page van het artikel in kwestie, niet op die van mij.] 21:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


==Fair use rationale for ]==
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007 ==
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> —]] <sup>]</sup> 19:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.


==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg==
<small>This is an automated delivery by ] 19:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC) </small>
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== Stop this, please ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Stop accusing me for being nazi crime denialist. --] 18:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg==
:You deny nazi war crimes, of which I have provided proof on your talk page for everyone to see.] 18:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
]
::<sup>Note: User:Kurt Leyman has removed the proof from his talkpage for some reason. For variability purposes, I will place it here. ('''''')] 18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)</sup>
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
You have not provided any sort of real proof. Now you are merely trying to blackpaint me, especially as I provided reason for my edit on that certain page. And if you wish, a certain convention supports me. --] 18:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
:Which convention? The one that says it's okay to attack a citys center with dozens of heavy bombers while the supposed target is a small bridge near the edge of town? ] 18:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
::<sup>'''Important background information:''' ''Kampfgeschwader 54 was called away from the Belgian front to be deployed in the Netherlands, this was a unit of heavy bombers, not Stukas necessary for a tactical breakthrough. Hitlers goal wasn't a breakthrough over the willemsbrug but the capitulation of the Netherlands. If the Netherlands wouldn't capitulate Utrecht, The Hague, Amsterdam, Haarlem and other large cities will also be bombed. The German defensive arguments supported by International law saying that Rotterdam was a defended city is worthless given that the bombing was a part of a much larger plan'' ] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)</sup>


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
::Can I remind both of you that it's not our task at Misplaced Pages to work out what that event was, but only to find out how that event is usually talked about in the relevant literature? Thanks, --] ] 18:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== Dutchman ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Good point. I always thought "Dutchman" was neutral at worst, and possibly affectionate, not an ethnic slur. Whoever posted that might have been jumping to the conclusion that any colloquial ethnic identification is automatically a slur. ] 15:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg==
:Indeed. Perhaps the person who added it didn't understand the meaning of 'slur'.] 15:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
== Rollmops correction ==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
I just noticed you reverted my edit (your reversion has been unreverted in the meantime.) Apparantly you took issue with my comment "presumably corrected". I try not to claim things I am not 100% sure of, therefore the "presumably". I am not sure that the word "rollmops" is German, but I ''am'' sure that the little evidence I was able to find supports this, whereas I was unable to find support for a dutch origin. If you have a source that demonstrates a dutch origin of the word, I'd be happy to see it. Then we can raid the German rollmops page together, OK? :-) --] 23:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
:No it's my mistake. I was pretty sure I once read the etymology being Dutch, but I'm getting idea it's a folk etymology, although it could be related to rollmop, some vaguely similar scottish dish.] 12:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
== Sinking of the Bismarck ==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Hello, Rex Germanicus. Thank you for your interest in the ] article. I perceive that you had a problem with the article's former title, ''Last battle of the battleship Bismarck'', since you renamed it to its present title. However you have not posted any explanation of your change. Could you explain, either her or (preferably) on the article's talk page, the reason for your change? Regards, ] 19:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
:Be right there.] 19:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
==Personal attack by Lygophile==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg==
i didnt make a personal attack. you said fallacies about me, which i pointed out, thank you· ] ] ] 09:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
]
:You said, and that's for everyone to see , and that's a personal attack. Everything I said about you is true, and can clearly be seen in your edit history.] 09:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
::<small>(])<!-- Template:RPA --></small> ] ] ] 10:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
==Personal attacks==
Rex, you seem to have found a new way to silence the (I agree sometimes blunt) reactions from other editors on your edits; removing them as being a personal attack. Be very careful that you do not interpret every disagreement with you as a personal attack, añd start removing angry remarks which do not fall within ] Anyway removal of personal attacks is frowned upon. Removal of just critisism is (of course) vandalism. So, make sure you don't cross the line. ] 15:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:I know when people are making blund remarks and when they're seeking to offend me.] 19:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:: Just warning for caution. Personally, I think leaving up Personal Attacks is better for two reasons. 1st: Leaving them up shows bad on the tally of the attacking, rather than the receiving editor; 2nd, you avoid any speculation of vandalism. But its your talk page/account, so you are free to do what you think is justified. ] 22:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:Leaving them might make others think they can get away with them. ] 22:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
::'''''' --&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 23:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
::: Well I have to say there are several Germans who seem to be out there to relate everything to German. This happend once to the river ], which has an established English name. And actually until this day the Dutch streams of the Rijn/Rhine are called Niederreihn on the map in the infobox of the page. With Niederreihn neither being Dutch (Nederrijn) nor English it is clearly a German POV map that is set up there. I understand some of Rex' frustration with this, althoug I tend to disagree with his approach. You yourself seem to have a fairly German POV; and your comments on Rex are not truly fair either, so to quote a suitable quote for a Christian holiday: "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone" (John 8:7).] 23:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:::: '''''' --&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 03:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
== ter leringe der Nederlandschen tale van den Afrikaanschen broederen ==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Hallo Rex.


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Ik bemoei me voornamelijk met nl.wiktionary, voorheen ook de afrikaanse versie daarvan. Daar werkt nu eigenlijk alleen Manie en hij heeft de neiging om alle Govertsche uitghebreiden uitghangen als zoete koek te slikken. Ik heb wel eens getracht zijn enthousiasme te beteugelen maar dan krijg ik dus alle onzin die op nl.wikipedia staat naar mijn hoofd. Dit laat wel zien hoe schadelijk het Govertiaans gebeuren is. Dus mijn dank voor je optreden hier. Wellicht dat je ook wat op af.wiktionary ervan kan zeggen?
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
:], nl.wikipedia: Sokpopje


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
::Als je me de link geeft zal ik dat zeker doen. Op de Engelse wikipedia had hij twee z.g.n "''sockpuppets''". {{User|Govert Miereveld}} - {{User|Scavenger}} - {{User|Bombshell}} zijn één en dezelfde persoon. ] 09:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
:::Bijvoorbeeld: ], maar er is veel meer van dat schoons. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 15:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
:Okee, waar wil je dat ik mn zegje doe?] 15:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Eh Manie's gebruiker bladzijde lijkt me: hij is vrijwel de enige ebruiker
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg==
:Heb je zelf al geprobeerd er iets van te zeggen?] 19:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== ] ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Rex Germanus,<br/>
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg==
Something seemed to've gone awry with links to the above, in lieu of which I'm guessing you created {{tl|Regions of Europe speaking Germanic languages}} and {{tl|Regions of Europe Speaking Germanic languages}} (although the second of these doesn't use ]'s sentence-case style). I think I've now repaired the confusion, meaning that both the template pages you created in lieu could now be deleted, but thought I ought to check with you first. Thanks for trying to sort out whatever happened! &nbsp;Yours, ] <span style="font-size:90%;">]</span> 00:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
:I created those templates to replace {{tl|Germanic Europe}} which was very inaccurate and biased from a nationalist point of view. For some reason I couldnt edit the template itself, I later found out this was because it was used in the featured article of that day, ]. I'm sorry for the mess, and it's okay to delete it as long as the information I altered in the inaccurate original stays.] 10:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
:: Ahh, I see now, having looked at the pages' histories. {{tl|Germanic-speaking regions of Europe}}'s content currently seems identical to that of {{tl|Regions of Europe Speaking Germanic languages}}, so I've deleted the latter and {{tl|Regions of Europe speaking Germanic languages}}. If, though, I've missed something, let me know and I'll compare them more closely, amending {{tl|Germanic-speaking regions of Europe}} accordingly. Yours, ] <span style="font-size:90%;">(])</span> 07:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== "Dutch Dwarf" ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks much for trying to improve the ] article by moving it, but (despite most things related to the Koninkrijk der Nederlanden) the breed really is called "Netherland", not "Dutch". Thanks, though, for trying to improve the English Misplaced Pages; I know that I'm not good enough at any other language to work on any other Wikipedias. ] 19:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
==]==
Hello, I see that you have edited the article on the ] and written "however the ships were destroyed by the Nazi German army". This is widely disputed, do you have any reference to support your view? Regards, 20:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)]
:Hi Kon-Tiki001, yes I did provide (a reference) proof for the Nazi Germans destroying the ships. However, it seems a certain ] edited the section, still saying the Germans destroyed the ships (as they did, there is little dispute actually) but leaving out the reference I provided.] 14:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
::Hi Rex Germanus. The web page you're refering to can't be considered "proof", this is just one persons opinion. The fact that we're actually discussing this problem proves that the issus is disputed. I've been a part of an excavation team excavating at Nemi a few years ago and the general consensus among scholars is that it's neither possible to prove that the fire was cause by the Germans nor by squatters. Both are equally possible and as long as we're able to find real facts about this, and not just some random web page that says that it was caused by the Germans, we're better off leaving both options open. I suggest we revert the edits to include both options. ] 18:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:Well that page is at least something, and it's a university page, not someone personal opinion. If you have a source that clearly says the Germans didn't burn the ships, then we're open (if the source is reliable/unbiased) to make clear the burning is disputed. ] 19:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
::Even if some info is posted on a university page doesn't necessarily mean that it's peer reviewed and unbiased. I can put something on my web page at my university and link to that. See the point?. Any way, I'm not going to use more time on this. ] 22:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
But it '''is''' a reference from a non-personal website, and up until now you have provided no counter-reference that supports your version. Once that's set, we can discuss which source is more reliable.] 12:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:: Hi again. First of all, check out this web page: , quote: "Some do not think the Germans committed this act of historical irreverance, but that it was caused by Italian refugees fleeing the fighting between the Germans and the Allies. The refugees were known to have taken up refuge in the structures housing the ships and could have inadvertently torched the ships through a campfire or some other means." Secondly, in an article in May/June issue of Archaeology by Deborah N. Carlson "Caligula's Floating Palaces" she states regarding the fire "An official report filed in Rome later that year described the tragedy as a willful act on the part of the German soldiers. A german editorial blamed the destruction on American artillery fire. '''The true story of what happened that night will probably never be known'''". Not surprisingly German and Italian views differ on this point. But as long as one is not establish for a fact what really happende, it's better to include both possible explanations in an unbiased article. ] 12:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
== Moved ]-discussion ==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Hi, I've moved the discussion to the talk page of the ] article. ] 12:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007) ==
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
<small>This is an automated delivery by ] 14:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC) </small>
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== Icelandic ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Greetings - I'm curious as to why you don't think Icelandic should be considered the "closest living cousin" of ]. On the one hand, this could be merely another manifestation of every man's desire to regard his own culture and language as having the most noble and ancient roots, but on the other hand, Icelandic grammar is certainly extremely conservative - as far as I'm aware, more so than any other Germanic language. Thoughts? ] 04:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg==
:] first of all is a reconstructed language, and unless we're somehow someday able to build a timemachine, we're never going to know for sure what the language was actually like. But even then, even the reconstructed information doesn't support the idea. Icelandic (like all North Germanic languages) for example lacks both a instrumental and vocative case. This means PG had 6 cases and Icelandic has 4.
]
:Point is, there is way to be sure, and no way to accurately compare. If I were you, I'd go to say that Icelandic (together with Faroes) resembles Old Norse most of all. ] 08:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== Consociationalism ==


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I saw that you took the Netherlands off the list of examples at ]. I always thought that the Netherlands was a classic example, with the division being between Calvinists, Catholics, socialists and liberals. I'm therefore re-adding the example, with the disclaimer that this was only the case until the 1960s. Please correct me if I'm wrong. ] 16:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
==Image source problem with Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg==
:No in that case you are correct, but only from the 1850s till 1960s.] 16:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
]
::OK, thanks. I just wanted to make sure because although I've read lots about consociationalism, I didn't want to contradict someone who clearly knows more about Dutch politics than myself! ] 16:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
== Kaart Nederfrankisch ==
]
Dag Rex, je had laatst de ] bijgewerkt een verbeterd. Ik vroeg me af of je dat ook kon doen voor de ], de lijn van het Nederfrankisch loopt namelijk te ver door (op de Veluwe), zie de kaart voor het Nedersaksisch voor de juiste lijn van 't Nederfrankisch. Alvast bedankt! ] 18:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ik zal er eens naar kijken. Waarschijnlijk heb ik voor vrijdag een nieuwe versie voor je.] 19:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
::Okee, de kaart is af. Ik heb de Nederfrankische dialecten in Duitsland lichter geel gemaakt. Dit omdat deze dialecten al heel lang blootgesteld zijn aan een niet-Nederfrankische (zelfs niet Nederduitse) standaardtaal. Dit is de zelfde procedure als bij het Nedersakisch, waar ik de in Nederland gesproken varianten ook lichter geel heb gemaakt. Ik heb ook Flevoland als Nederfrankisch invult, alhoewel ze technisch gezien leeg moeten blijven omdat Flevoland (op Urk enzo na) geen inheemse dialecten heeft. Ik heb wel nog een opmerking, de lijnen die we nu gebruiken om een scheiding te geven tussen Nederfrankisch en Nedersakisch zijn wel erg scherp, terwijl het werkelijke overgangsgebied (dat in Nederland over de veluwe loopt) ontzettend vaag is. Maar dat zijn details waar later altijd nog naar gekeken kan worden. Ik hoop in ieder geval dat je tevreden bent. ] 09:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
==Nederlandse Publieke Omroep==
==AfD nomination of ]==
Hoi, je hebt deze pagemove gemaakt: Leuk en aardig dat het zo correct taalgebruik mag zijn, maar zo heet die organisatie dus niet. Zie en de website van de ]. Dus ik stel voor dat ik dat ongedaan maak ok ? --] (] • ]) 11:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> ] (]) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
:Als je zeker weet dat de organisatie die naam altijd gebruikt ga je gang.] 11:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007) ==
== Move requests for categories ==
{| style="width: 100%; padding-right: 1em;"
| colspan="3" valign="middle" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: lightsteelblue;" |
] <big>'''The ] Newsletter'''</big><br/> Issue XXII (December 2007) <br/>
|-
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 65%; " |
; Project news
* The ] has been created.
* The ] has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is ], with 22 points, followed by ], with 8 points, and ], with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
* ] is needed; any assistance is welcome!
* {{tl|WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.


| valign="top" rowspan="3" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 34%;" |
Please note that ] should be used for changing the names of categories, not ]. I have therefore removed your request from WP:RM; this does not indicate disapproval of the request, but is only a procedural matter. --] 16:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
; Articles of note
:Sure...] 16:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


New ]:
== Your request ==
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]


New ]:
Sorry, but I'm only semi-active these days and don't feel like taking on another of these disputes right now. Can you try someone else? ] ] 15:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
# ]
# ]


|-
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007) ==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; Current proposals and discussions
* A ] has begun.


|-
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; Awards and honors
* ] has been awarded the ] in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
* ] has been awarded the ] in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
* For their outstanding efforts as part of ], ], ], and ] have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.


|-
<small>This is an automated delivery by ] 15:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC) </small>
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
==WikiProject Netherlands==
; ''Tag & Assess 2007''
Hi Rex, knowing you as a tireless editor of Netherlands related articles I was surprised not to find you among the members of the recently created ]. There is a lot of work to be done in tagging articles; and even without your membership you may contribute by tagging Netherlands related articles (you can use <nowiki> {{WPNL|class=}} or {{WikiProject Netherlands|class=}}</nowiki> to tag Netherlands related articles). best wishes ] 21:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
] is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:


{{div col|cols=2}}
== dutch-afrikaner related image ==
:1. ] — 7,600
:2. ] — 5,500
:3. ] — 5,200
:4. ] — 3,500
:5. ] — 3,000
:6. ] — 2600
:7. ] — 2250
:8. ] — 2,200
:9. ] — 2000
:9. ] — 2,000
:9. ] — 2,000
:12. ] — 1,340
:13. ] — 1,250
:14. ] — 1100
:15. ] — 1000
:15. ] — 1000
:15. ] — 1000
:15. ]1000
:15. ] — 1000
:15. ] — 1000
:15. ] — 1000
{{div col end}}


Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.
You are missing a third part of the diagram, how the groups are related ethnically/ancestrally. You will then have culture, language and ancestry/descent. I think it will look great if you make this improvement. In the ancestry sense, the Dutch, Flemish and Afrikaners are obviously very closely related (basically descended fromthe same ancestral group), while the Frisians would be more distantly related to these groups. Peace. ] 03:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
:Doesn't the ancestral line become clear from their sequence to another? Anyway, the Flemish and Afrikaners already have lines that even more clearly indicate decend. What would you like to see altered? Do you just want lines going from the Germanic peoples to the Afrikaners?] 07:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a ]. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants
== Dutch and German ==
alike are very welcome and appreciated.
Rex, I came here because of your comment on
|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: right; font-size: 85%; " |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section ].
|}<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small>


http://de.wikipedia.org/Bild:The_development_of_the_German_linguistic_area.gif


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shieldwall.JPG==
Your quotes in italics:
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
''This map incorrectly portrays Dutch as German. Dutch was never a part of German.''


Dutch and Low German formed a continuum until the Netherlands established a standard language separate from Low German (and High German of course). As someone interested in Germanic linguistics you ougth to know that. The animation reflects this fact by "blending out" the Dutch-speaking area after that point in time. It doesn't specifically claim that Dutch was "part of German", but merely that the two formed a continuum at one time, which is true. The only page where that animation is used is http://de.wikipedia.org/Deutsche_Ostsiedlung, where this fact is relevant. Flemish people and language played an important part in medieval "Ostsiedlung", therefore it would be faulty to omit it.


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg==
''he was banned from German wikipedia because of nazi sympathies''
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 05:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I see comments edited by the author Michael Postman after your wrote the above, so it probably isn't true. Even if it was true, it wouldn't be a valid argument but rather an ad hominem. The fact that specificially the German wikipedia community bans someone says nothing about that person anyway, because the "banning" practice and culture of free speech there is abysmal .... ] 15:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
:As I know of linguistics I know that the dialect-continuum between Dutch and German did not end when the Netherlands established a standard language. The Dutch and (High) German standard languages emerged virtually simultaneously, with mass education and increased mobility further signaling its end. Besides, though often moribund, extinct or disappearing the continuum still exists. That was not why I made the remark. The map has/had the following caption: "''The development of the '''German''' linguistic area''". The map then shows Dutch as German, as everything green is supposed to represent the German language, which suddenly 'disappears'. If you're making a map about the Dutch-German/Continental West-Germanic dialect continuum that's perfectly fine. But when you make a map on the developement of the German language (which this one is/was supposed to portray), or German dialects, leave Dutch out of it. It simply isn't German. Michael Postmann was banned on the German wikipedia for Nazi sympathies and doubtfull sources. His maps are flawed and based on lies. A simple example. He once made a map on the German language in 1910. He claimed it was based on a ''']''' census of Germany, yet the German language could be seen far outside the German borders. Which is unreferenced as it concerned a national (ie Germany) census. People who are nazis are not to be trusted, ones who also use doubtfull sources ought to be banned. It is hence not a personal but a valid argument.] 16:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


== Speedy deletion of ] ==
So you agree with the facts presented on the map animation, you just disagree with the wording? Come on, relax. It is not uncommon to do so, even in printed maps of reputable sources. Example:
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.


If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
http://members.chello.nl/~r.kepper/images/DeutscheMundarten-3.jpg


Thanks. --] (]) 05:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I can see that this kind of presentation might be perceived as "German centric", but then again that is not necessarily illegitimate e.g. in a context of German history directed at German speaking audiences. Conversely, Dutch dialect maps often marginalise the German speaking areas and could thus be accused of "Dutch centrism". Again, that is perfectly legitimate. See for example
==AfD nomination of List of terms used for Germans==
]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:List of terms used for Germans | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
http://nl.wikipedia.org/Afbeelding:Taalafstanden.jpg


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 18:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Some people even take this to extremes. The following map declares all of Northern Germany as "Dutch speaking":


== Milhist coordinators election has started ==
http://ethnisme.ben-vautier.com/analyses/cartes/gif/allemagne.gif


And even in Russia they speak Nederlands according to this author:


:The February 2008 ] election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please ] by February 28. --]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 21:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
http://ethnisme.ben-vautier.com/analyses/cartes/gif/kaliningrad.gif


==Fair use rationale for Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG==
Would you take offence at these maps? I don't, it's just a bizarre way of applying labels. :) ]
]
:::It's quite the opposite. A Dutch dialect map, will generally only show what it's supposed to represent: Dutch dialects.() Call it German dialect when you're showing German dialects, Dutch dialects when you're showing those, something else when you're showing both. It's very simple. But that is of course not my only objection, if it was I'd have already renamed the image. My main objection is that it is '''totally unreferenced''' and if there is one thing you should not do, is to trust the unreferenced maps made by neo-nazis who were banned on a wikipedia project for using flawed sources.] 08:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ]. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is no ] as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the ], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found ].


Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
==Your comment at my ArbCom ==
Thank you for , but please note that ArbCom pages are not meant to be normal, threaded discussions. Your post should be moved to its own heading in evidence if you can provide diffs to back it up, or to ], where normal comments by various editors are presented.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 19:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
:I'll change it right away.] 19:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:Missing rationale --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
== ] ==


==Unspecified source for ]==
] is an interesting read, may I suggest categorizing it with ] for wider publicity?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 20:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
:Sure, good idea.] 20:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


==German Nationalism==


]
After reading your posting at ] evidence regarding Matthead, and looking over your user page and some of your contributions, I have the impression that you are particularly adverse to what you perceive as "German Nationalism". What do you think of "Polish Nationalism", "Russian Nationalism", "Dutch Nationalism", and all the other "nationalisms"? Are some less obnoxious to you? How do they rate on your scale? And please understand that I ask you these questions with an open visor, in other words, with a genuine desire to to know your perspective without a bias on my part. ] 00:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC) p.s. I'm also intrigued with your user name. What made you choose it?
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
:All extreme forms of nationalism, and there rarely are other forms, are to be avoided and condemned, hence "''my scale''" deals with nationalism on wikipedia ''in general''. However, I do indeed have a particular aversion concerning German nationalism. Simply because of German history. It's important to know your history, and let's be honest, the Poles/Poland have/has a lot less bloody history than Germany. Is that a reason to be less proud? Probably not, but it depends on which particular aspect of your country you're proud of. As for my name, I originally had a totally different name, a Dutch one with diminutive, but I experienced that it wasn't really compatible (if you will) with the edits I made to wikipedia. So I went out to look for something different. I liked Rex but it was already taken by some Indonesian contributor who made 2 edits a year ago (but still 2 too much for me to take over his name) so I added Germanus, "Germanic" (though some see it as "German", in my view though that would be teutonicus) because of my particular interest in the Germanic languages. I'm still not completely pleased with it though, and I'm thinking of changing it again, but I'm not sure into what.] 08:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks for your input. Personally, I have a greater problem with fanaticism than I do with nationalism, as it can merely be a reflection of pride in ones heritage and so forth. It's fanaticism combined with obstinacy and narrow-mindedness that is a much greater danger to humanity (and the WP project too), IMHO. And when it is applied to any or all of the passions that can move people (like nationalism, religion, political dogma, historical bias, ect.) then it can become very horrific. ] 14:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC) p.s. No comment on Dutch nationalism?
:::To me fanatacism and nationalism are close to one another. Nationalism to me is a unhealthy pride in a country, nation or ethnic group (ie harming truth or other peoples feelings). Your definition of nationalism seems to be closer to patriotism, which I do not consider that harmfull. As for Dutch nationalism, what do you want me to say on that subject?] 14:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
::::Anything you think about it.] 00:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
:::::Well any form of nationalism, like I said, wether Spanish, Danish or Dutch, is to be avoided. Though Dutch nationalism ... it isn't as strong as many other national forms. Nationalism often comes from a feeling of jealousy, hate or fear. When that's largely absent, like in the Netherlands ...nationalism just isn't that extreme.] 08:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
::::::With no offense meant to the Netherlands, it's also possible that "the bigger the dog, the louder the bark." But I strongly disagree that nationalism ''comes from a feeling of jealousy, hate or fear''. The "often" part of the statement strikes me as weaseley. In larger countries (and some smaller ones too) the "powers that be" like to use many things to keep the general mass of people placated, and love of country (even an exaggerated one) is a very useful tool to do so. Of course there are others, like attacking ] and letting people know what ] is up to. At least that's my spin on it. ] 02:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
:::::::Well Germany between 1933 and 1945 is a good example. They feared (and at the same time hated) communism they hated the victorious WW1 allied powers and certain ethnic groups, and were jealous that (in their eyes) Germany didn't get the respect it deserved. (Just some factors of course) I'm also convinced that old view of "select group vs. masses" isn't correct. It takes a very long time of (willful!) indoctrination before nationalism becomes a second nature. In my view, nationalism often is allowed to happen because people experience it as pleasant (as longs as they're winning/on top of things of course)] 09:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
::::::::Sure Germany between 1933 and 1945 is a good example, but also a good example of beating a dead horse. Who is the "they" who feared and hated communism? The German people or the "powers that be"? Read the proclamations of Napoleon. Read Shakespeare's King Henry V 's rallying of his troops on St. Cripian's Day. Come to the United States on the Fourth of July (especially in a smaller town). Nationalism leaves its imprint throughout all of history. Interestingly, Stalin and the "powers that be" in the U.S.S.R used nationalism to defeat their enemy (a philosophy they had so stridently combatted earlier). Take nations like Poland and Lithuania, who were deprived of their "national" existence for over 120 years and then overrun again by outside powers. Is their "exaggerated" patriotism or nationalism justifyable? I think so. Is it based on jealousy, hate, and fear? I think not. ] 17:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
"They" are of course the German people. I'm not one of those people who believe the German nation was held hostage by "the nazis". I don't make difference. Who hated who? Both hated communism how and why is another story but they still did. As for Polish/Lithuanian nationalism, of course it based on those 3. Jealousy of more advanced wealthier countries, hate of their historical occupiers/ideologies and fear of ever being pushed over again.] 14:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
:I find your interpretations very interesting. Where does American (U.S.) nationalism fit into your theory of jealousy, hate, and fear? It's been a part of American culture from the U.S.A.'s founding. I say this lest you concentrate on the "Cold War" or some such period. ] 14:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
:: Well you ought to differentiate. Your worldview is a bit simplistic. For example you don't differentiate between hatred of other nations and pride of one's own heritage ''without'' implied "superiority" towards other nations. IMHO the first is disgusting, but the latter is legitimate and actually necessary. Furthermore you don't differentiate exactly who holds what beliefs. If you think that "all of the German people" were nationalists at one point you're treating them as a collective instead of individuals. In some circumstances it is OK to think of nations as collectives, but not when you're talking about individual behaviours (which nationalism is - it is an attitude that individuals hold, but not a nation as a whole). (And it can easily be shown that there was no point in time when 100% of German people held nationalist views). On the other hand you ought to examine your own beliefs more critically. For example when you imply that Dutch nationalism isn't that extreme, aren't you asserting that the Dutch are superior in certain aspects, thus refuting your own claim? Regards ] 07:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
:::My worldview isn't simplistic your view on nationalism is wrong. With nationalism, not patriotism, there is always implied superiority. As for the Germans. I refuse to drop into semantics. The fact that never 100% of the population was a selfproclaimed nationalist says nothing. What does say something is that the 60% of the Germans who did not vote for hitler did nothing when he made himself a dictator. Apparently they thought it wasn't a big deal.] 09:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:Image source --> — ''']''' <sup>|''' ]'''</sup> | 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
:::: ''With nationalism, not patriotism, there is always implied superiority.'' That is exactly what I said. The problem is that you don't differentiate. Dr. Dan described the Polish desire for statehood as rightful patriotism (and I agree), but seem to think they're not entitled to it.


==Image source problem with Image:Wilhelmus.png==
:::: ''The fact that never 100% of the population was a selfproclaimed nationalist says nothing.'' For one it says that the German people as a whole were not nationalists thus refuting your contrary claim. To emphasize this point even further: Can you imagine that German patriots were put into concentration camps? People who loved their country yet were opposed to the nazis (not a contradiction of course).
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.


As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
:::: ''What does say something is that the 60% of the Germans who did not vote for hitler did nothing when he made himself a dictator.'' ''Apparently they thought it wasn't a big deal.'' That does not follow, non sequitur. There are lots of other possible explanations. Besides show me a nation who behaves differently, most ordinary people aren't heroes and who can blame them.


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
:::: Regards ] 09:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
:::::Nonsense. Apparantly what I already feared might be true. You 're one of those people who believes the nazis held Germany hostaged don't you? And that the overall majority of the Germans were on the good side? ] 10:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


== Image:Rexintro.png listed for deletion ==
:::::: No I believe none of the above. I'm trying to explain that simple explanations are always wrong. Your simplistic worldview is wrong, but the "opposite" simplicity is also wrong. Don't make me defend it. History is never black & white, it's always greyscale. ] 11:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} ] <span style="font-size:75%">]</span> 16:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw -->
::::::: Right, but that shouldn't be an excuse to get ridd of main lines. Hitler would have said the reasons for WW2 went back to the 30 years war. But to many that is utterly irrelevant. Point and fact is that he, with the overwhelming majority of the Germans approving, started a war which killed millions and affects even more people today. ] 18:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


==Comment moved from user page==
:::::::: You're changing the subject, we aren't discussing what Hitler did. We were discussing your individual interpretation of what constitutes nationalism and who to blame for it. And I still think you ought to be much more careful about whom to blame than you actually are. Regards ] 07:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
As a human being, you should have accepted the fact that nobody is perfect, even ... you. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:::::::::History is never black and white, but never forget the main lines. Point is, that the Germans (just an example) did invade Poland. And to me its practically irrelevant if perhaps a dozen of soldiers didn't want to, point remains they still did and that it happened in their name.] 09:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


== Files listed for deletion ==
:::::::::: I think you have an axe to grind. Of course you won't admit it. ] 12:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Some of your images or media files (], ]) have been listed for deletion. Please see ] if you are interested in preserving them. <!--isindex used on index pages -->
:::::::::::These kind of comments kill a factual discussion. Of course you know this.] 13:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you.<!-- Template:Fdw-multi --> ] (]) 11:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


== Dutch Flood Plains ==
Well I've made my point. Your wording in every paragraph emphasizes a collective view on "the Germans". You completely ignored my point that politicial attitudes (of which nationalism is an example) are by definition held by individuals, not collectives.


Hi,
Collective descriptions on nations (or other collectives) are difficult. You have to be careful not to make judgements, because by definition it's not right to judge an entire group of people. Collective descriptions are legitimate only in the context of such things as cultural features, mentality, "character traits" (even though that is at the edge of prejudice already). But you cross that line without hesitance, you ascribe political viewpoints to an entire nation and blame them for it. That is not legitimate. What else is there to say, than to draw the conclusion that you yourself hold prejudices, and goodbye? ] 07:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


I was wondering if you could send me the link or file of ? Thanks so much.
Does the last 60 years of German history not count for anything? ] 02:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


==German translation==
Would you like to help translate articles from German to English for ]? ] 14:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
:No thanks, to be honest that takes a lot of time, and I'm not that terribly interested in Munich.] 15:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


] (]) 07:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
== Willicher and Orangerider ==


Absolutly right you left. ] (]) 03:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I think you are mistaken, take a look at the contributions by Orangerider on german language wikipedia ], he has been contributing there since March 2006. Willicher seems to have been contributing since August 2004 on german language wikipedia ]. Both accounts with a large number of contributions.--] 16:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
:That may be. I still do not trust this.] 17:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


== ] == == ] nomination of ] ==
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
I have closed the sockpuppetry case, and I have concluded that there has been no violation of policy by anyone. Thank you for taking the effort to present the evidence. You are welcome to request that I review the case if further evidence comes to light. Best regards. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
== Old Dutch language map ==
Hi Rex,


'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I am studying all the languages of the world at the moment on Misplaced Pages. Very interesting!


== File:Anthem-joke.PNG listed for deletion ==
The ] that you downloaded is not correct. According the the Old Dutch article, Old Dutch ended in 1150 and was replaced by Middle Dutch. Untill that time, Noord- and Zuid-Holland were inhabited by Frisian speaking people. Dutch speaking people entered the area from Utrecht and Flanders during the colonization of the swamp area, in such amounts that the Frisians became a minority and started to talk Dutch as well. The article ] can tell you more about it.--] 10:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 14:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


== File:Neusaap.jpg listed for deletion ==
I can better make it visible:
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 14:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
]
]
:As you will see, the map doesn't fully colour the North of North Holland. By 1150, the Westfrisians were already retreating or assimilated. The map you show on Frisian settling doesn't apply for this time.] 09:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


== File:WikipediaWork.png listed for deletion ==
::I am a history student and i followed a course on the history of the county of Holland a few years ago. The counts of Holland used to be Frisians. Due to the Dutch immigration they started to take over the Dutch language. That happened during the 12th century.--] 10:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 14:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
:::If that's true, and I'll take your word on it, the map is accurate.] 15:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


== File:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter42.jpg listed for deletion ==
::::The county of Holland was predominantly Frisian in the early 12th century, but some parts of the kingdom of Frisia were inhabited by Dutch (or Frankish). There is probably too little data, so no exact evidence available.
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 14:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">]</span> 07:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


== Military Historian of the Year ==
::::I didn't downloaded the map of Frisia. I merely gave it as an indication.--] 17:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::Okay then.] 18:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


Nominations for the "]" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so ''']'''. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the ], ] (]) and ]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 00:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC) <small>You were sent this message because you are a listed as a ] of the ].</small>
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007) ==
<!-- EdwardsBot 0221 -->
== File:Groot-Nederland.png listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 20:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> '''Yoenit''' (]) 14:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
<small>This is an automated delivery by ] 14:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC) </small>
== File:Dutchdialectpic.PNG listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


== Notification of automated file description generation ==
== Nemi ships ==
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.


This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 11:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
What Do you mean with Nazi German Army ???? The correct name is "Deutsche Wehrmacht" or German Wehrmacht!Even the Allies did not regard the "Wehrmacht" as a National Socialist organization!This whole article seems very biased and Anti-German! It is meanwhile a tradition to blame the Germans for everything happened in WW2. There is no evidence that the Germans have done it! If the Italians maintain, the Germans had the act committed, then they have to bring the evidences: Which german military unit put the fire. Who is responsible for this instruction. What was the name of the commander of this unit. Where are relevant witnesses for it? Otherwise it is only "hearsay"!! In our juridical system the plaintiff has to prove the debt of the accused and not the accused its innocence. "In dubio pro reo" as the Romans said! Giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt. And last but not least, why should the Germans burn down the ships? These ships where a prestige object of her "friend" Mussolini. The recovery of the ships was a large propaganda success for the Duce and its fascistic state. He used them to link Italia under his rule with the Roman Empire, and himself as a Successor of the Roman emperors. Therefore it would be more logically to assume, that these ships were set on fire(as a symbol of the hatred Neo Roman-fascistic Ideology) by the Italian Communist Resistance or by accident. Ask yourself why the Italian Goverment after the war never demanded a compensation for this so-called warcrime from Germany! So would like to see your evidence that proofs unquestionably the german debt!!!!


*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 13:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Regards
Christos Chanos
:It's all in the article. I suggest you read before you make comments like these. Also, defending nazis does not make you very respectable in my eyes.] 18:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


== A discussion of interest ==
I have read the article and there is no reliable source for your claim. But maybe i should trust you. The Dutchs have a lot of experience in commiting warcrimes*(Indonesian War of Independence) and not to forget the exploitation,slavery and torture of the native people in your former colonies. Oh and the Buuren in SA with her rascistic Apartheid! Arent they from dutch descent? Seems to me that the dutch have a lot in common with their german "Blutsbrüder"(bin ik van duytse blood)


Since you participated in the discussion at ], I think you may want to comment at ], too. Cheers, --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 14:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
It is really a shame to see that these "heroic" Dutch LIBERATED by the Allies, killed innocent Indonesian people because of their demand for freedom! And all this happened AFTER WW2!!! And today the Dutchs still complaining about the german occupation? They can thank god that the Germans doesnt treated them in the same way like they have treated(see below)the Indonesians. The Dutch tasted only a small dose of her own medicine!
== File:Dietsland.png listed for deletion ==
But for an hypocrite it is easier to blame the sins of others instead of dealing with his own sins...
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 22:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
==File permission problem with File:Dutch-Americans.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.


If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
*Estimates of Indonesian deaths in fighting range from 45,000 to 100,000 and civilian casualties exceeded 25,000 and may have been as high as 100,000. 7 million people were displaced on Java and Sumatra.(Source Misplaced Pages)
* make a note permitting reuse under the ] or another acceptable free license (see ]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
::Well it's a pity you find the sources unreliable. But hey, not all books were written by Hitler, so you must have that alot. I don't know if it's common in Germany to prove a lack of sources by referencing to the opposing editor's country's (war)crimes, but it isn't done on wikipedia. It just would be fair to German editors like yourself. They would lose every single discussion. Learn to discus like a regular human being or consider yourself banned from my talkpage.] 10:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter ]. If you take this step, add {{tl|OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
:::'''''The user chose to continue his/her nazi rant. He/She may consider her/himself banned until further notice.] 17:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)'''''


If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org'''.
The 2 comments you deleted were made by me and another editor. Calling people nazis when you don't paticularily like something is terrible. ] 20:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:If they try to revision history it's fair. Sad you don 't understand.] 20:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tl|non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at ], and add a ] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
The comments have nothing to do about revisionist history. ] 20:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:Then I hereby conclude you're an illiterate. ] 21:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in . '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 08:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Is this all you have to say? ] 04:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
:What else is there to say? If you refuse to see/accepts what's there then there isn't much I can do for you. ] 11:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Troubled ==
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Hi. I'm The goings-on on this talk page were recently brought to my attention, and I find them deeply troubling. (I also find Cheiron's apparently tangential ruminations on the history of the Dutch troubling as well, so don't think this is just focusing on you, admittedly.)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Could you explain to me how is a Nazi rant or revisionist history? I have difficulty immediately seeing the problems in this edit, which you . I'm also curious how you figure you're banning anyone.


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
I admit ignorance of this specific dispute (I understand there's a general dispute over how and when to use "Nazi" when referring to WWII Germany), but I am troubled by your conduct here. I would appreciate some sort of explanation. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 21:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:It's not the matters on the talkpage that are troubling, it's the individual posting. I do not like it when people come to this talkpage and make ridiculous statements/accusations. There is an article, and I found sources that say Germans burned those ships, if he thinks that's not true then he should come up with sources that say so, not offend my herritage for some reason. He is a textbook post war revisionist German. He probably believes his grandparents, who "never did a thing" and never met anyone (apart from the few on tv) who admitted they had an active part in WW2. He thinks Germany was held hostage by nazis, and that all but a few were good people. I'm not here to burst that bubble, I'm here to make sure he doesn't gets ideas like that on wikipedia. I banned him from my talkpage, very simple, I'll remove his comments if he continues to post here, and if neccesary request admins to block his acces to this page. Simple. ] 21:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
::Well, I'm an admin, and I'm here to tell you that not only would I not enable you to remove good-faith comments, but I'd sanction you for doing so. Fair warning.


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
::I notice you didn't answer my question. How is the diff I linked a revisionist rant? It can become very easy to ignore good points because they're spoken by someone who annoys you. In this case, while ] should certainly be ] (or ], I guess, definitely not "Deusches Reich year to year"), it is typical to refer to Nazi Germany's military as the Wehrmacht, even in modern English-language contexts. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 21:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
:::Eh, ''"...I’d sanction you"''? For removing a comment on ones usertalk? Ah okay, that’s an effective way to encourage Rex to communicate. Some helpful block rationale suggestions: "" or "]" or "" or "". I’m slightly "troubled" with that particular part of your communication here as well. --] 09:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
::::I wouldn't have put it in quite those term, but I agree that removing comments from your own talk page is not a blockable offense. However, labeling people ("You are a so I won't listen to you any more") is uncivil and not a good way to discuss an issue. It would be better to either discuss the content only, or to ignore the person, than to dismiss them with perjorative labels.


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
::::Getting back to AMiB's original question, I would suggest that for a person with Rex's ], someone who pops up to object to the term "Nazi army" but not "German army," who denies that the German army could have done something without citing the specific unit and commander who gave the order, and who believes that the deed was done by Italian communists (on the basis of no sources whatsover) instead of the retreating German army (on the basis of valid but poor sources) sounds very much like someone who is specifically interested in a version of German history that denies or minimizes responsibility for a lot of things that you or I might take for granted. Of course, it would be far better to simply remove the comment with a neutral edit summary like "''Removed after reading''" than to apply a perjorative label. ] 10:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
:::::Let me get it straight here, I was always under the impression that it's allowed to remove comments from your talkpage, do tell me if this is not the case. ] 11:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
::::::Also, AMib, if you believe that those were Good faith comments then I propose you read them again. Because if thats good faith ....] 11:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
==An ANI report==
== ] of ] ==
Hi Rex. Just to let you know that ] concerning you has started. Please have a look at it. -- ] - <small>]</small> 04:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
]
:I've replied. ] 11:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== TfD nomination of ]==
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] 12:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
:Yeah sure go ahead. I made that as a test version, which later got implemented in the original. I don't think it was ever used.] 15:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
==Blocked for 2 weeks==
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges as noted . If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> below. -- ] - <small>]</small> 20:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
{{unblock|. If I understand this admin correctly I've just been blocked for 2 weeks because(s) he feels I was wrong in calling a user, who admits having a wrong editing attitude, a vandal?}}

<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 15:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

== January 2021 ==

] Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to ]. What files are those exactly? See . --] (]) 21:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
== ] listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note -->
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
== ] listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note -->
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 04:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Factual data with no source cited, first tagged as such in 2006'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 10:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:30, 25 March 2024

Comment This user has lost faith in the project and left Misplaced Pages.


Misplaced Pages is no longer about who is right or wrong. It's not about discussing, referencing and accepting one was wrong. It's about blocks, personal attacks and lies.

It's better to stop editing when getting one, because no one is going to take you seriously. You're branded. Admins will ignore you, make offensive remarks and will reward the ones who provoke you. You're an outcast, no matter how good and well-sourced your edits are. I refuse to accept that.

I've loved editing Misplaced Pages. With over 8500 edits, dozens of articles and media to show for it, but enough is enough. I demand to be treated as a human being and I will not lower myself anymore. Enough is enough.

I'm leaving Misplaced Pages, standing by every edit I ever made here wether on an article or on a talk page, and denying the admins the pleasure of banning me.

— Rex


Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.

— Sophocles

Wie een hond wil slaan, vindt licht een stok.

— Dutch proverb.
They found their sticks. Rex (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Community ban

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

See Misplaced Pages:List of banned users#Banned by the Misplaced Pages community. - Jehochman 17:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has removed your name from that list. The statement there formerly said:

Rex Germanus (talk · contribs · block log), December 11, 2007
Community banned for repeated edit warring, point of view pushing, incivility, and use of IP sock puppets to evade scrutiny and editing restrictions. Fifteen prior blocks failed to change the behavior.

Sincerely - Jehochman 11:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please note that you remain indefinitely blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. You will remain blocked for ninety days at least. At the end of that period, you may contact me by email to discuss whether, and under what restrictions, you might be permitted to resume editing with this account. Any decision to unblock you would be subject to Jehochman's veto. Any violation of the terms that may be agreed would result in immediate indefinite blocking. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I will support any reasonable terms proposed by Angusmclellan. - Jehochman 12:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Frau Antje Der Spiegel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Frau Antje Der Spiegel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 19:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Goldmember

An article that you have been involved in editing, Goldmember, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Goldmember. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Albuera
  2. Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
  3. Battle of the Gebora
  4. Constantine II of Scotland
  5. Francis Harvey
  6. Vasa (ship)
  7. Wulfhere of Mercia

New A-Class articles:

  1. 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing
  2. Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
  • Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
  • For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007

Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

1. Bedford — 7,600
2. TomStar81 — 5,500
3. Parsival74 — 5,200
4. FayssalF — 3,500
5. Roger Davies — 3,000
6. Ouro — 2600
7. Kateshortforbob — 2250
8. Cromdog — 2,200
9. BrokenSphere — 2000
9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000
9. Maralia — 2,000
12. MBK004 — 1,340
13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250
14. Sniperz11 — 1100
15. Burzmali — 1000
15. Cplakidas — 1000
15. Gimme danger — 1000
15. Raoulduke471000
15. TicketMan — 1000
15. Welsh — 1000
15. Blnguyen — 1000

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shieldwall.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Shieldwall.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Eighty Years' War

A tag has been placed on Template:Eighty Years' War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of terms used for Germans

An editor has nominated List of terms used for Germans, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of terms used for Germans and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES  21:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly 16:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Marcus_van_Boxhorn.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcus_van_Boxhorn.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?pd_THOR | 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Wilhelmus.png

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilhelmus.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rexintro.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rexintro.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Comment moved from user page

As a human being, you should have accepted the fact that nobody is perfect, even ... you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.9.25.203 (talkcontribs)

Files listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files (File:Historygerman2.png, File:Historygerman2.png) have been listed for deletion. Please see Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2009 May 25 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. PhJ (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Dutch Flood Plains

Hi,

I was wondering if you could send me the link or file of dutch areas that are constantly flooded? Thanks so much.


70.73.145.207 (talk) 07:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Absolutly right you left. GoldenAgeHolland (talk) 03:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Comparison of Sinterklaas and Santa Claus

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Comparison of Sinterklaas and Santa Claus. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Sinterklaas and Santa Claus. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Anthem-joke.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anthem-joke.PNG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Neusaap.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neusaap.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:WikipediaWork.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikipediaWork.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter42.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter42.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Globalize/Netherlands

Template:Globalize/Netherlands has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed  00:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

File:Groot-Nederland.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Groot-Nederland.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Dutch customs and etiquette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dutch customs and etiquette is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dutch customs and etiquette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yoenit (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Dutchdialectpic.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dutchdialectpic.PNG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly 19:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:AllochtoonAutochtoon.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

A discussion of interest

Since you participated in the discussion at Talk:Rathaus, I think you may want to comment at Talk:Ratusz, too. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Dietsland.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dietsland.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dutch-Americans.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dutch-Americans.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 08:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dutchmilitary.png

Notice

The file File:Dutchmilitary.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flemish region colours.png

Notice

The file File:Flemish region colours.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:HOLLANDS2.PNG

Notice

The file File:HOLLANDS2.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BRABANTS.PNG

Notice

The file File:BRABANTS.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ethnic stereotypes Dutch.png

Notice

The file File:Ethnic stereotypes Dutch.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PADutch-version 1.png

Notice

The file File:PADutch-version 1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PADutch-version 2.png

Notice

The file File:PADutch-version 2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dutch linguistic influence on naval terms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dutch linguistic influence on naval terms is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dutch linguistic influence on naval terms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Dutch-Americans.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dutch-Americans.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Dutch-Americans.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dutch-Americans.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dutch labelled

Template:Dutch labelled has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Influencegraph.PNG

Notice

The file File:Influencegraph.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Factual data with no source cited, first tagged as such in 2006

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)