| Revision as of 14:44, 13 July 2007 view sourceMelsaran (talk | contribs)15,935 edits →TOKIO HOTEL← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:25, 21 June 2010 view source David Levy (talk | contribs)Administrators45,228 edits blanked | ||
| (953 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|age=10|target=./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|dounreplied=yes|index=./Archive index|bot=Werdnabot|botlink=User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Howto}}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-10 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Salaskan/Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--werdnabot-index User talk:Salaskan/Archive index--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| == Spelling == | |||
| You are, incidentally, wrong about the spelling. 'Discrete' means things which are separate and distinguishable, binary and not analog; 'discreet' on the other hand means 'marked by prudence or modesty and wise self-restraint'. It's pretty obvious given the context which is right and which is wrong. | |||
| As for 'Wikipaedia' - if Misplaced Pages had in some counterfactual world been named in British English or Latin, that'd be just fine and 'ae' it'd be. But as it is, there is one name, a name devised by Americans, and so the only correct name is 'Misplaced Pages'. --] 00:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Heh, how funny, I didn't know that. Sorry for reverting you. Regarding the "Wikipaedia" thing, I know A. B., and he always spells it like that, probably because he disagrees with it being spelt "Misplaced Pages". And ] says that "It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct typing errors, grammar, etc. It tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting." Although I personally think that this is nonsense (you are only making it better readable by correcting typos), many people frown upon editing others' comments. I recommend that you don't do that. <b>]]</b> 10:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Five pillars== | |||
| Heya! An edit of yours regarding 3RR was reverted at ]. What the reverting editor didn't explain is that 3RR is included in the proceeding paragraph, and therefore included as a hard rule by proxy. So, what I mean to say is, you were right, but the guy that was wrong was right to revert... Now my head hurts... cya aliasd'''·''']'''·'''] 01:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, I didn't see that. Still, I disagree with it saying "WP doesn't have firm rules", because 3RR gets applied at all times, even the edit was in good faith and reverted trolls/anons. <b>]]</b> 10:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My recent RfB == | |||
| Thank you so much for your participation in ]. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community. | |||
| I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at ]. Thanks again! ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 04:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Left a comment on the talk page. Good luck on your second RfB! <b>]]</b> 11:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for July 2nd, 2007.== | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 3, Issue 27''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | | |||
| |} | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 08:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == idiom? == | |||
| I usually know (or at least think I know) what interesting turns of phrase mean. But this one: has me stumped. Clue? Thanks. ] 13:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You go to Misplaced Pages, enter it in the search bar, and ]! <b>]]</b> 13:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, ok! Uncle! ] 13:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Quite interesting, how speech between European and American users can be so easy and so confusing ;-) <b>]]</b> 13:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thank you for confirmation== | |||
| Although I deleted the original article as nonsense, thank you for clarifying the phrase "So i herd u liek mudkipz" and redirecting it appropriately. This was something I wasn't aware of. ]] 20:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome! Some anons were edit-warring at the article on ] to include info about the meme (it has now been semiprotected, but then they went on and included it in the article on ]), so I thought it'd be handy to create the redirect to prevent the article from being made. Hope it'll work :-) <b>]]</b> 12:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Werdnabot == | |||
| Re: : Does this mean that pages that have the Werdnabot Archival Code are automatically archived by Shadowbot3? Should this information be added to the relevant pages? —]→] • 00:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yup. As you can see at the top of this talk page (when editing), it says it's archived by Werdnabot, but as you can see in the history of this talk page, it is in fact archived by Shadowbot3. It'd be a good idea to update the pages. <b>]]</b> 00:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello! == | |||
| It's good to finally be greeted on here -- Thanks! As for the warning, I just felt a more personalized approach would be fun :) I have one of the tools installed that reverts changes and warns users, so it makes it much easier. Thanks again! ] 14:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome! Of course, personalised messages are always preferable, but I didn't know if you were aware of the User Warning system. I have ] installed, by the way, what about you? <b>]]</b> 14:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That's what I have installed, too. It's an awesome tool! ] 23:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Changing my name and about vandalism report == | |||
| Oh you speak 1337 thats why you find my name suspicous. | |||
| So I find my name Ok. But If I need to I'll change. | |||
| I'm not making vandalism. I'm Removing it. | |||
| But I've found an IP making vandalism so I reverted the changes and can report you: | |||
| The IP is: | |||
| 69.123.33.176 | |||
| This were the vandalic changes: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=The_Best_Damn_Thing&diff=143118481&oldid=143118300 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=The_Best_Damn_Thing&diff=143119727&oldid=143119442 | |||
| {{unsigned|N00bh4ck3r|18:59, 7 July 2007}} | |||
| :Thank you for your help in the struggle against vandalism! I the IP, because he vandalised even after he got warned. If he continues, he may be blocked for a brief period of time. | |||
| :About your username, you do not necessarily need to change it, but names in leet are often looked down upon because Misplaced Pages is a serious encyclopaedia, and many vandals/trolls have names in leet. You may, of course, choose to keep it, if you continue to make valuable contributions you're very welcome here! But I just recommend you change it (at ]), so people will be less suspicious with your edits. That is all :-). | |||
| :P.S. you can ] your comments on talk pages with four tildes <nowiki>(~~~~)</nowiki>. <b>]]</b> 17:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == That link == | |||
| You posted a link to a "canvas" I did. I actually didn't, I made a comment there after he made a comment on my RfA (exactly like I'm doing now). <font face="comic sans ms">]<sup>]</sup></font> 18:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops, sorry. I couldn't have known that, I just saw the edit. I'll strike the comment. <b>]]</b> 18:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hey, it's ok, we all mess up sometimes XD. <font face="comic sans ms">]<sup>]</sup></font> 18:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Live Earth == | |||
| My friend, you cannot have the critique removed from the intro. Removing it only makes the article POV and laughable. --] 22:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| There is a criticism section below. Therefore NPOV is preserved. ] 23:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Camptown, you reverted four times without a comment, doing so is prohibited by the ]. You ignored my comments, and those of Kerowren, Gakhandal and an anonymous editor. I filed a report ]. <b>]]</b> 23:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The anon here, I got the 3RR to. No matter though, but someone still needs to edit that. And sorry to bring the discussion here Salaskan.--] 23:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::No problem. The edit warrior has been blocked, by the way. I recommend you get an ], it takes only a few seconds and people will be less suspicious of your edits ;-). <b>]]</b> 23:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You passed up a perfectly good opportunity for the best edit summary of all time: "Elvis has left the article" ] 00:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Lol. <b>]]</b> 00:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My (Kwsn's) RfA == | |||
| Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It unfortunately did not succeed. I still plan to continue to edit however. Hope to see you around. <font face="comic sans ms">]<sup>]</sup></font> 15:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The Rambutan is back! == | |||
| Thanks for , and !--] (]) 17:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Rambutan. You're welcome, I can't stand people who keep using article talk pages as a forum. ;-) <b>]]</b> 17:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Live Earth - Gore Aid== | |||
| Point taken. It still seems to be a minority view not that widespread. Approx. 500 Google results. Only 4 "Google News" results of news media. My concern was the illusion of credibility and "widespread-ness" such a phrase gets when quoted. By way of example. Let's say 99% of people think one thing - and a just a handful of writers think something different. Without going into the merits of which side is "correct" - does putting the view of those handful of writers in a wikipedia article - and it taking up much much more than 1% of that section - create the illusion of greater dissent than there actually is? It would be wrong to censor the view altogether. If it has been articulated by someone credible - and has appeared somewhere credible. But if the reporting of it takes up as much space as the reporting of the majority opinion - are we leaving a misleading impression? What do you think? ] 18:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :"Gore Aid" is merely a sceptical nickname occasionally used by critics. It doesn't have to be widespread to be eligible for using in a Misplaced Pages article. It's a "criticism" section, which means that what we do is cite prominent critics. If one critic (and yes, ] is prominent enough) calls it "Gore Aid", there's nothing wrong if we include one sentence about that in the "criticism" section. It has nothing to do with majority opinions and minority opinions, the section is labelled "criticism" after all. The "Friends", "Inspiration" and "Background" sections are positive enough. <b>]]</b> 18:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == '']'' brouhaha == | |||
| I'm curious: are you actually disputing that this publication is written from a left-wing perspective? Or are you just stirring the pot, creating a tempest in a teapot, or ? If you're disputing this, I'd be curious to hear your thinking on it. Otherwise, it might be best to leave this alone, as it seems hardly worth requiring a citation for (as evidenced by others removing your <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag). +] 19:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :As you could probably see on my user page, I live in the Netherlands, so I don't know the magazine. That's why I want to know if it's really left-wing. ''If it's so self-evident, it shouldn't be too hard to find a source for it. If you cannot find a source, apparently it's not self-evident.'' (by the way, let's continue this discussion on ], to keep it in one place) <b>]]</b> 19:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for July 9th, 2007.== | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 3, Issue 28''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | | |||
| |} | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 08:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Studylink== | |||
| Hello, you participated in the discussion for this AFD which was redirected to the old location - the author has now added a reduced form in the ']' section clarifying the difference between the two. Should this be allowed to remain, and if so, in its current form? It could be reduced to just 'Not to be confused with the website for international students ' perhaps. Please reply on my talk page or make changes to the page as you deem appropriate. ] 00:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd prefer a redirect, a disambiguation page with only one blue link is unnecessary. We can perhaps add a ] at the redirect target. <b>]]</b> 13:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wiktionary== | |||
| See ] and ]. I found the ezboard comment by googling "wiktionary is crap." The rest is mine. <font face="Courier New" size="1"> ---]</font> 18:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == TOKIO HOTEL == | |||
| THERE ARE NOT A ROCK BAND!!! THEY ONLY HAVE GUITARS AND MAKE POPMUSIC!! TOKIO HOTEL= POP!! NOT ROCK ODER ALTERNATIVE! ] | |||
| *Stop typing in all caps. | |||
| *Please use proper spelling and grammar. | |||
| *They are not a "pop" band, do you know the band at all? | |||
| *If you think they are a "pop" band, find some sources. I can find hundreds of sources saying that they're pop-rock or alternative rock. | |||
| <b>]]</b> 14:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Now stop reverting, I added multiple reliable sources. Get some reliable sources stating that they're "pop" in order to add that genre. Good luck. <b>]]</b> 14:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 21 June 2010
Redirect to: