| Revision as of 15:16, 20 July 2007 editTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:24, 7 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,178 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| | |||
| {{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines| importance=Mid}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Catholicism|importance=Low}} | |||
| }} | |||
| ==== | |||
| Speedy criteria '3 No content whatsoever. Any article consisting only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. This does not include disambiguation pages.' | Speedy criteria '3 No content whatsoever. Any article consisting only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. This does not include disambiguation pages.' | ||
| is not met. ] ] 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | is not met. ] ] 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :The version that was tagged for speedy deletion was . The only thing that couldn't be made up from the title alone is "in the Philippines". As such, this is ] or ]. <b>]]</b> 15:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You should indeed improve your logical thinking, before anymore such taggings that disturb Misplaced Pages content creation. ] ] 17:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Article definitely lacks context? What is Archdiocese? Where (or what) is Nueva Segovia? Cant I even read the first line without drifting off to a hunting mission? --] <sup>]</sup> 17:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This is a clear A1 speedy delete candidate. I will leave this talk page, but I will delete the article. A predicate nominative is a ''fact'' and not an article. An article contains discussion, context, history, and not a mere statement of a single fact. "Moby Dick is a novel" is not an article. ] 18:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Eugene, this is ''still'' on the edge. We all feel in our hearts that it's a significant place/organizational center, but that feeling has to be borne out in our page. I do not know anything about ''Eugene Onegin,'' but I feel sure that there is a lot to say. Having an article that says, "This is a major work of literature" really wouldn't be acceptable to retain, nor would it represent work that would need to be preserved under GFDL. It would be, instead, a placeholder -- reserving a spot and ''marking it'' without the benefit of any real writing. It is in fact because we ''should'' honor our authors that we ''shouldn't'' preserve predicate nominatives as if they were writing. They're not. ] 16:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:24, 7 February 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Speedy criteria '3 No content whatsoever. Any article consisting only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. This does not include disambiguation pages.'
is not met. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- The version that was tagged for speedy deletion was . The only thing that couldn't be made up from the title alone is "in the Philippines". As such, this is no context or no content. SalaSkan 15:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- You should indeed improve your logical thinking, before anymore such taggings that disturb Misplaced Pages content creation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Article definitely lacks context? What is Archdiocese? Where (or what) is Nueva Segovia? Cant I even read the first line without drifting off to a hunting mission? --soum 17:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
This is a clear A1 speedy delete candidate. I will leave this talk page, but I will delete the article. A predicate nominative is a fact and not an article. An article contains discussion, context, history, and not a mere statement of a single fact. "Moby Dick is a novel" is not an article. Geogre 18:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Eugene, this is still on the edge. We all feel in our hearts that it's a significant place/organizational center, but that feeling has to be borne out in our page. I do not know anything about Eugene Onegin, but I feel sure that there is a lot to say. Having an article that says, "This is a major work of literature" really wouldn't be acceptable to retain, nor would it represent work that would need to be preserved under GFDL. It would be, instead, a placeholder -- reserving a spot and marking it without the benefit of any real writing. It is in fact because we should honor our authors that we shouldn't preserve predicate nominatives as if they were writing. They're not. Geogre 16:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)