| Revision as of 02:18, 29 July 2007 editSunray (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,109 edits One more time← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:30, 29 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,011,931 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| | |||
| {{Sustainability}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Environment}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archive box|]}} | |||
| I've added {{fact}} lots of places where I think the text needs references. Hopefully with time the references can be added which will greatly increase the credibility for our readers. --] (]) 12:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed move == | |||
| : citations needed, yes, but it isn't necessary to add these markers after every word in a list. I've cut them except at the end of the sentences in question to decrease the interference with readability. ] (]) 18:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I've add that the R-values you mention are American and based on imperial measure, since they are different to the R-values used here in Australia (which are SI). An American R value 0f 17 to 55 is equivalent to an Australian R Value of approximately 3 to 9.6. | |||
| I think this great article would be better over at ]. I'll just go ahead and do it sometime after march 2006 unless there is clear objection. --] 20:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I see the point in using this article to start a wikibook, but I don't see any point in diminishing this article in any way. In any case I'd be glad to help out with a wikibook. Got any interesting ideas for a name? ] 13:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think the name should change, at least not the name of the url, it's too important for search engines that it be meaningful. I would also suggest that this article be trimmed down to describe the concept of straw bale construction, not the how and why - that's not encyclopedic, that's a how-to which belongs over at wikibooks or similar. But how about if I concentrate on moving it, and we'll take it from there. There are big discussions going on on some SB email lists about the best way to distribute information - so I want to move fast while the topis is alive. --] 13:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fair enough, sounds good. ] 13:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I think the information should stay here. Make a copy at ] by all means, but there should also be an article here for people who want to read a quick intro to the subject (which is what this is, after all). | |||
| :<font face="strong" color="green">*]*]*]*</font> 20:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, I'm an idiot. I didn't realize the proposed move date was March 200'''6''' | |||
| ::<font face="strong" color="green">*]*]*]*</font> 20:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== External links modified == | ||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| Ok, I've just added a bunch of material and reorganized a bit. There are tons of beautiful straw-bale houses out there... anyone got time to dig some up? ] 15:58, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
| == Environmental considerations == | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110621161559/http://skillful-means.com/pages/details.php?pid=14&photonumber=1&showphoto=vault01.jpg to http://skillful-means.com/pages/details.php?pid=14&photonumber=1&showphoto=vault01.jpg | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110710075736/http://www.aceee.org/proceedings-paper/ss98/panel01/paper04 to http://aceee.org/proceedings-paper/ss98/panel01/paper04 | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. | |||
| I don't have the resource material handy to write about environmental considerations -- both external (resource consumption) and internal (offgassing? better or worse for people with environmental sensitivities than conventional construction?). Anyone up for the challenge? | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
| ] 16:42, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 10:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of ] link == | |||
| I removed this link as it doesn't seem to bear any relation to straw bale construction. ] 11.30, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == New Guy == | |||
| Greetings everyone. I stumbled across this article and was compelled to become a member of Misplaced Pages, though I have been passively using the site for a while. I have been active in the SB community for the past few years, having worked on various stages of several projects in the US. I was one of a crew of four who built a strawbale residence from the muddy foundation trench, to the roof's ridge cap, to the finish coat of plaster. I am currently living in the UK working on a master's degree in Advanced Environmental and Energy Studies at the ]. | |||
| I'd like to contribute to and improve this article, but I'm new to the Wiki process so bear with me while I take it slow. | |||
| I made a few edits to the external links and listed them in the edit summary. My reason for changing the text of ''The Straw Bale House'' to The Canelo Project (leaving the URL the same) is that the Steens' Book, while beautifully done and very influential, is also seriously outdated. The Canelo Project is still thriving and it seemed better to just call the link what it is. All of the Steens' books are available from that site. | |||
| I can recommend some other books but I am not familiar with the etiquette re: linking to Amazon or other commercial sites. | |||
| I moved The Last Straw Journal to the top, because for up-to-date information there is no better resource. I added Surfin' StrawBale just below it because it is the longest-lasting (and longest) list of links related to straw bale construction that exists. | |||
| I moved the two links to the Paso Robles project description together, since they're related. After browsing through both sites, it seems to me that they are detailing a long, ugly dispute between an owner and his former contractor. While the negative aspects and pitfalls of straw bale construction need to be addressed, are these links appropriate? There is really very little information about straw bale construction there. | |||
| The dimensions in the materials section are kinda screwy, especially the bulk bales. I'm going to go in and fix what I can; I know that bulk bales are not 3 inches square :) | |||
| Straw blocks are cool, and need to be mentioned, but they are not bales, nor is using straw blocks really straw bale construction. Is there a better place to put them? | |||
| That's all for now, cheers. | |||
| ] 15:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==We need to restore some detail to this article== | |||
| The Wikibooks project is fantastic (though rather optimistic, don't you think?), but there's no reason why we can't have a fair amount of detail on this page. People still want an encyclopaedic summary of information without having to read an entire ebook. ] 18:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree entirely. I read the article and thought - is that all they've got to say about it. It seemed lopsided with all those links at the bottom but very limited text. Can't remember what led me to the talk page, but I certainly didn't see the Wikibook link on the main page - my brain filters that kind of stuff out.--] 11:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I certainly agree! There is no reason why you should not have a complete article here. If the material overlaps with ''Wikibooks,'' so be it. ] 03:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == External link proposal == | |||
| Dear editors, | |||
| I write here at the suggestion of ] | |||
| I would like to suggest that this page http://naturalhomes.org/learning-straw.htm makes a valid contribution to straw bale construction since it enables people to find a straw bale construction course, information that is otherwise very difficult to find. This page, http://naturalhomes.org/naturalhomesmap.htm in addition shows the location of straw bale homes around the world (using google maps) with links (once you click an icon) to the home builders own website. | |||
| Can I have your opinions as to the contribution these two links could make? | |||
| Regards, Oliver ] 01:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I have read the guidelines for links and suggest for the moment that this DMOZ link replace all the links in this article. http://dmoz.org/Business/Construction_and_Maintenance/Building_Types/Sustainable_Architecture/Straw_Bale_Construction/ However, I believe that links that support or reflect the resurgence of natural building are entirely in keeping with the article. ] 02:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I generally agree with the comments Oliver makes, above. However, I must confess to being unimpressed by the map. I don't know how it is for the British Isles and Europe, but it is ''woefully inadequate'' for North America (and almost laughable for Canada). ] 06:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for your support Sunray. I am convinced that a link to the straw bale construction course page (http://naturalhomes.org/learning-straw.htm) is a valuable contribution, not least because it links to most, if not all, of the major learning providers. Similarly a link to the map (which now contains more straw bale buildings) is a central point for people to see the result of the resurgence in this building technique. These resources collectively demonstrate the strength of the construction method around the world and more easily enable prospective self-builders to use the method. So how is this progressed? ] 01:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've now had the chance to look over the link in detail and do not see any justification for calling it "spam." I would like to see ] rationale for this. It is not a commercial link and does not appear to be selling anything. On the other hand, it does provide a wealth of good information about natural building. As I suggested above, it tends to be UK-centric, however, that is not necessarily a bad thing, since so many of the natural building links are US-focussed. I am interested in Dirk's rationale, but as of now, can see no reason for not having this as an external link. I will take a look at the other links to see if they are likewise suitable for the article. ] 07:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The question raised by Dirk regarding inclusion of the naturalhomes.org link was discussed at ] and resolved. The point was made that users should not add links for organizations they own or control. If they do, it may be seen as advertising. However, in the case of the naturalhomes link, it ''is not'' selling a product and it ''does'' provide valuable information and resources on straw-bale, that supplements the article (a criterion of ]. I (a neutral party) have therefore added the links (see comment below). ] 17:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::To clarify, Spamming is about promoting your own site or a site you love, not always about commercial sites nor has to be "selling something". Links to commercial sites are often appropriate. Links to sites for the purpose of using Misplaced Pages to promote a site are not. Specific policy on the ] issue is ]. Unfortunatly, the link s not appropriate as it '''promotes''' Building Courses and Workshops, many of which require registration and is ''not a resource about the subject''. Again it does not help to expand the article, rather '''promotes''' Building Courses and Workshops. Remember this is an encyclopedia, ] to Building Courses and Workshops, or an advertisement service for conducting business. Hope that helps clears up the policy issues.--] 03:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Hu12: I cannot disagree with most of what you have said, above. However, Naturalhomes has ceased promoting this site. As outlined below, I added the link after a review of the links for this article. I think our difference is in your second use of the word "promotes," above. It has to do with the use of that term to describe the site. As someone who has subject-matter expertise in ], I think that the term "provides resources" is more apt. The site is a ''compendium of resources'' for natural builders. I am also a long-time editor of ''Misplaced Pages'' and not known to be overly permissive on external links (quite the reverse). If I put myself in the place of a reader who wants to know more about straw-bale construction, the naturalhomes site is a good resource. I think that this link should be in the article. I will restore that link and call for other editors to join this discussion. ] 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I have to add that I am concerned that you would go back on what you had said and (I thought) we had previously agreed to on the ], to wit: | |||
| ::::::::However, since the decision is now being discussed on the articles talk page, if it is found to be relevant, informative and should otherwise be included, a neutral and independent Misplaced Pages editor (other than Naturalhomes may add it... | |||
| :::::::I am a neutral and independent editor. I did review the link and I did find it to be appropriate, and so added it. ] 06:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Groundrules for External links=== | |||
| I've pruned the list, added a commented-out note with some groundrules, and removed the "clean-up" tag. In accordance with the discussion above, I have added the naturalhomes link and map and also the dmoz link. These are good general resources, IMO. I removed several links that didn't seem to meet ]. The one I wasn't sure about was the California Straw Building Association link. I don't find it very content-rich and the main event listed is now in the past. It does give details on a grant (if you are in California), but other than that it has little that isn't provided by other links. Comments? ] 17:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The changes you made seem well considered. The link to the resources on naturalhomes.org have been removed again. I would like to re-open the debate among those people who know something about the subject and are able to judge the quality and contribution of external resources. ] 00:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Inclusion of naturalhomes site as a link== | |||
| Hu12 has removed the following entry under External links: | |||
| *Naturalhomes.org Resources on straw-bale, including a of locations worldwide | |||
| Hu12's rationale for excluding this link, the following: | |||
| ::... Specific policy on the ] issue is ]. Unfortunatly, the link s not appropriate as it '''promotes''' Building Courses and Workshops, many of which require registration and is ''not a resource about the subject''. Again it does not help to expand the article, rather '''promotes''' Building Courses and Workshops. Remember this is an encyclopedia, ] to Building Courses and Workshops, or an advertisement service for conducting business." | |||
| :::For clarity, here is the text of the section that Hu12 refers to above: | |||
| ::::Due to the rising profile of Misplaced Pages and the amount of extra traffic it can bring a site, there is a great temptation to use Misplaced Pages to advertise or promote sites. This includes both commercial and non-commercial sites. You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked. If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Misplaced Pages editors decide whether to add it. | |||
| :::I have no particular interest in the site. The question to be addressed, then, is whether or not the site is a good resource for encyclopedia readers. ] 16:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The link initialy was added with a ] by ], and was removed per policy. The ] On ] can be found @ ]. The issue now is does this link meet Misplaced Pages policy guidelines for inclusion.--] 17:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| There has been a fair amount of discussion about this link, above. In short, I restored the link to the article because it provides a general resource for natural building and straw-bale construction. The resources it provides include courses, links, books and a map of locations of straw-bale homes. I believe it should remain in the article. ] 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Further discussion=== | |||
| ::'''Note''': The issue of promotion is addressed above. The issue is whether this link is a useful resource for readers. ] 16:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::'''Comment''': I believe the issue at hand now is whether this link meets Misplaced Pages policy guidelines for inclusion. If readers were looking for Building Courses and Workshops, they would most likely search google not Misplaced Pages. There is no ''encyclopedic'' reason for its inclusion other than to promote the site naturalhomes.org and its advertisers soliciting Building Courses and Workshops. --] 17:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, in case it wasn't clear, I do not think that this link meets guidelines for inclusion as per ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Would you be able to tell us which aspect of ] it doesn't meet? ] 22:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| It seems to me we are experiencing a bit of ''piling on'' by folks from the WikiProjectSpam, all of whom seem to have the same opinion. Anyone with natural building knowledge or expertise care to share their perspective? ] 23:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I am becomming concerned about ]'s persistant refactoring and moving of comments during this active discussion. Please refrain from adding nonsense such as '''&ot'' to topic headders such as , and unnecessary renaming .Talk pages comments are meant to be a record of a discussion; moving or editing comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Comments were purposly replied to in specific locations in response to questions/comments do not remove other peoples comments, such as and as it can significantly can change their meaning. --] 02:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have simply refactored as per guidelines. The request in the "Poll" section is: "If you wish to discuss this matter, please comment in the appropriate section above and then vote below." Several people (including myself) failed to abide by this. Lengthy discussion makes it difficult for people to vote. so I refactored. You have continually reverted my doing that. I have no idea why. I will ] that you are not trying to interfere with the polling process. So why not just settle down and let people vote? BTW the "&ot" was added by the machine. Sorry about that. Now, please, just relax and let's get on with this. ] 02:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Poll=== | |||
| Please indicate below whether you support or oppose retaining this link. If you wish to discuss this matter, please comment in the appropriate section above and then vote below. This poll will close at midnight on ], ]. ] 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| → ''<u>See also</u>: ] <br> | |||
| → ''<u>See also</u>: ] | |||
| *'''Support''' - Valuable resource. ] 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *If you believe this is a valuable resource, then please use it as a ]. Please read the ], ], ], and other relevant policies and guidelines. I do not believe this link should be included, it mainly promotes; even if it does not sell a product, ] certainly had an interest in attracting people to his page. For what it matters, the link was added under ], therefore the link was removed, and the link should only be included ''after'' consensus is reached on the talkpage. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 11:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Oppose''' Promotes Building Courses and Workshops, many of which require registration and is <u>not a resource about the subject</u>, nor does not help to expand the article. Fails ] and ]. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, ] an advertisement or referral service for Building Courses and Workshops.--] 11:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Oppose''' The "learning" link teaches you nothing but where you can spend your money on learning about straw bale building. The "map" while potentially interesting does not contain encyclopedic content - just links to other websites which may or may not have more information. It seems like a good website for people in the straw bale building community - but that does not necessarily make it a good link for Misplaced Pages. There is simply not enough encyclopedic information on either of these pages to make it worth linking. The on the website, which features articles about homes built with natural materials around the world, might be more appropriately included on a different page, but not on the straw-bale construction article. ] 13:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Oppose''' - its pretty blatant promotion, and other than that is not a valuable resource. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Remarks moved to "Discussion" above. ] 23:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:30, 29 January 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 Archives |
I've added lots of places where I think the text needs references. Hopefully with time the references can be added which will greatly increase the credibility for our readers. --DuLithgow (talk) 12:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- citations needed, yes, but it isn't necessary to add these markers after every word in a list. I've cut them except at the end of the sentences in question to decrease the interference with readability. Craig Butz (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I've add that the R-values you mention are American and based on imperial measure, since they are different to the R-values used here in Australia (which are SI). An American R value 0f 17 to 55 is equivalent to an Australian R Value of approximately 3 to 9.6.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Straw-bale construction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110621161559/http://skillful-means.com/pages/details.php?pid=14&photonumber=1&showphoto=vault01.jpg to http://skillful-means.com/pages/details.php?pid=14&photonumber=1&showphoto=vault01.jpg
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110710075736/http://www.aceee.org/proceedings-paper/ss98/panel01/paper04 to http://aceee.org/proceedings-paper/ss98/panel01/paper04
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 10:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories: