Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
(117 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1:
Line 1:
You basically gutted my edits to the lead of the ] article stating "The lead already refers to the controversy. Elaborating the controversy can be (and is) done in the body. This is more appropriate of an encylopedic article.)" Yet, you removed all mention of the controversy from the lead. So, you obviously got confused (or something). I put it back like it was, admittedly could be briefer, but not by removing all mention of the current controversy, which goes well beyond mentioning the criminal charges already filed. ] 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)