Revision as of 16:21, 4 August 2007 editCeyockey (talk | contribs)Administrators83,213 edits comment on removing prod tag← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:13, 13 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,539,471 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| | |||
I'm not certain why the warnings are still here considering that source articles are listed already. {{unsigned2|00:42, November 29, 2006|72.229.114.117}} | |||
{{WikiProject Video games|class=stub|importance=low}} | |||
}} | |||
I'm not certain why the warnings are still here considering that source articles are listed already. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:42, November 29, 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
* I agree. Valrith, please comment on why the tags cannot be removed. ] 17:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | * I agree. Valrith, please comment on why the tags cannot be removed. ] 17:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
** I've moved the unref tag down to a position just above paragraph 3, which is my sole remaining major complaint about the article -- Everything2 is not a ]. The orphan tag, imo, should remain because there is very little linking to here; however, if more than one editor disagrees, I wouldn't argue over its removal. I still don't think this show is sufficiently notable for an article, however, so I would argue that the notability tag should stay. ] 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | ** I've moved the unref tag down to a position just above paragraph 3, which is my sole remaining major complaint about the article -- Everything2 is not a ]. The orphan tag, imo, should remain because there is very little linking to here; however, if more than one editor disagrees, I wouldn't argue over its removal. I still don't think this show is sufficiently notable for an article, however, so I would argue that the notability tag should stay. ] 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:13, 13 February 2024
I'm not certain why the warnings are still here considering that source articles are listed already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.114.117 (talk • contribs) 00:42, November 29, 2006
- I agree. Valrith, please comment on why the tags cannot be removed. Vessels42 17:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've moved the unref tag down to a position just above paragraph 3, which is my sole remaining major complaint about the article -- Everything2 is not a reliable source. The orphan tag, imo, should remain because there is very little linking to here; however, if more than one editor disagrees, I wouldn't argue over its removal. I still don't think this show is sufficiently notable for an article, however, so I would argue that the notability tag should stay. Valrith 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I would argue for notability in the sense that this show was more successful than plenty of shows with pages on Misplaced Pages; a quick glance at List of television programs by letter yields, e.g. AlfTales, not to mention that the creators are writers from other noteworthy shows. I am open to expanding what links here, and fixing the references. Vessels42 19:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- On behalf of an in agreement with Valrith and Vessels42, I have removed the PROD tag as suggested at WP:DELETE#Proposed deletion under the line item "If you disagree". --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)