| Revision as of 03:49, 5 August 2007 editIdeogram (talk | contribs)11,726 edits →AfD China allegations: HG← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors43,684 edits Forth (programming language) listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (93 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| == Archives == | == Archives == | ||
| ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ||
| == Top-importance computer science articles == | |||
| == Notice of arbitration review case == | |||
| Hi Ideogram, | |||
| Please be advised that an arbitration matter on which you commented has been accepted as a review case at ]. You may present evidence on the case page or additional comments on the talkpage. This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. ] 01:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through ] and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as ]) are really as important as ] or the ubiquitous ], as opposed to simply of ] (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —'']'' 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration procedure == | |||
| :OK ] (]) 20:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I saw your post on the review case page. The editor filing an arbitration case should always be considered a party or at least a nominal party for purposes of participating in the case, receiving notices, etc. In fact, I explained this to a party to another case on my talkpage just yesterday, so this is not a unique practice in this case. No reflection on your editing or your compliance with the prior decision is intended. ] 05:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Birthright Israel == | |||
| :All right, I can accept that. I hope you understand I'm a little sensitive on the subject. --] 05:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == re:Medcab == | |||
| I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. ] (]) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I am trying to help out. ]]]. ] 05:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ''']''' (]) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == List of libraries in Taipei listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of libraries in Taipei'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :I am sorry, we really don't want you taking cases. --] 05:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::i have sent you a email using Emailthisuser. Let us continue this discussion through that. ]]]. ] 05:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Your recent bot approvals ] has been speedily approved. Please see the ] for details. {{#if: IdeoBot|When the bot flag is set it will show up in .|}} --]<small>]</small> 22:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Medcab bot == | |||
| Yeah, I think that should be the most recent version unless Xyrael has made any changes to it, which I don't believe he has... <s>oh, there's a new operator now? Well you should ask ] then. </s><font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, it's the same person. Should be fine then. Can't hurt to ask him though. :D <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)<s></s> | |||
| == RE: MedcabBot == | |||
| As you have observed it is somewhat broken and I am being spammed with error e-mails. Can I have the fix code of yours, please? :-) Toolserver e-mail is —] / 10:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The review relating to the above-named arbitration has been closed without action because ] has not edited for several weeks. Should Certified.Gangsta return to editing, the review may be reopened. This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. ] 23:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] - clarification or new case? == | |||
| It's unclear what you're requesting, but this is probably best framed as a new arbitration case, rather than a review of the old one. It's an old issue, but involves a new group of editors. You might want to read all the information about arbitration. Arbitration on Misplaced Pages, unlike almost everything else, is about people, not content. --] 04:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It is mostly the same people who were involved in the old case. I was hoping to save some time by framing it as a review and not a new case, but I can certainly make it a new case if necessary. --] 04:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd suggest starting a new case, if you want to go this route. You have to name editors as parties, inform them, put together evidence sections, etc. You can certainly reference the old ones. Read up on the procedures. This is a very formal process and quite time-consuming. --] 05:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Pathetic propaganda attempt by *** removed == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regard to your comments on ]: }}Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> | |||
| these types of uncivil edits - - (i.e. personal attacks) are not contributing to the community and i request you consider this when in conflict. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 17:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I feel I absolutely have to do this. == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your endless efforts in making sure ROC and PRC/HK editors don't go at war over each other, for standing up for us Chinese editors, and for consistently dealing with buffoonerly and misinformed editors on AfD discussions, I hereby honour you as a '''Defender of the Wiki'''. ] 18:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Well, it was refreshing knowing that a fellow Chinese editor wasn't going to let something as ridiculous as that slide. I'm generally not a very good debater, so I kinda popped in and out. I still can't believe what's coming out of their mouths though. ] 19:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no patience for bullshit. My quick temper has gotten me in trouble many times, right here on Misplaced Pages. Which is why it is such a comfort to have your support. --] 19:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Bravo for your work on ] and attendant RFA == | |||
| I only wish I had learned of your efforts earlier. Please do keep me posted on what you feel is of interest and importance on WP. ] 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Computer science == | |||
| Oh I agree that it wasn't blatant vandalism or in bad faith, which is why I put a mere warning level 1 on that IP's talk page. ] 06:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AfD China allegations == | |||
| Hi. It was good speaking with you yesterday. I take breaks on Fri nite and Saturdays. Anyway, I put a proposal on the Talk page I hope you will consider. The idea is to first focus on the NPOV requirements for the TITLE ONLY. Some key keep-voters already support name changes for some other of these apartheid articles, so you may get consensus for a MOVE & Rename. Second step is to deal with your concern with NOR, which may become less relevant after the rename. Thanks for reading this. Take care. ] | ] 03:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I saw it, thank you. I have read it and am thinking carefully about my response. --] 03:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024
 | I try to keep conversations threaded. I generally reply to posts here on this page. Usually if I post on your talk page I watchlist you. |
Welcome!
Hello, Ideogram, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Allan McInnes (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello and welcome
Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Misplaced Pages.
Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Misplaced Pages has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! Rossrs 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Archives
to 17 Jun 2006 | to 21 Jun 2006 | to 26 Jun 2006 | to 07 Sep 2006 | to 17 Nov 2006 | to 07 Feb 2007 | to 08 Mar 2007 | to 23 Apr 2007 | to 10 Jun 2007 | to 8 Aug 2007 | to 16 Jul 2011
Top-importance computer science articles
Hi Ideogram,
You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through Category:Top-importance Computer science articles and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as Compile time) are really as important as Alan Turing or the ubiquitous quicksort, as opposed to simply of high importance (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —Ruud 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Birthright Israel
Hello,
I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. Yaakov Birthright Franklin (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments
Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
List of libraries in Taipei listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of libraries in Taipei. Since you had some involvement with the List of libraries in Taipei redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Huangjinghai (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Forth (programming language)
Forth (programming language) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)