Revision as of 10:33, 10 August 2007 edit88.161.170.13 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:13, 26 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,206 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(100 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{notice|{{Find sources}}}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| | |||
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Belgium|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Beer|importance=High}} | |||
}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
==Edit war== | |||
==Authentic Trappist beer== | |||
Would all involved parties be so kind to stop reverting and start to discuss their views here? I'm sure all sides have good arguments and a concensus can be reached.--] (]) 13:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
"...only seven breweries in the world may legally produce Trappist beers. All six of them are Belgian." | |||
:OK: it would be helpful to the ordinary reader to have the brewery at Koningshoeven linked to the brand name by which its beers are generally known. ] (]) 20:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Are there six or seven breweries? | |||
/Claes | |||
::But, it's not a brewery AT Koningshoeven...you should know that <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:27, 4 June 2009 (CEST)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
---- | |||
:::It would be useful if you signed you comment.] (]) 18:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
There is no discussion concerning LaTrappe. It is no Trappist beer. | |||
:::Maybe the location could be mentioned in the article as well. encyclopedia articles are supposed to contain useful information, they are not supposed to be arenas for testing other people's knowlege of obscure arcana. ] (]) 18:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
feel free to modify the article yourself... | |||
I concur | |||
::::if only I could...] (]) 00:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
I'm afraid it is... Why do you think it's not?? | |||
:::::why can't you ? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
---- | |||
Peter, this is a general article about Trappist beer. It is also not mentioned, for example, that Chimay is not brewed by a monastery called Chimay. None of the breweries listed contain specific information about them. However, when you click on the brewery name, you come to an article about the brewery where specific information is perfectly valid. | |||
La Trappe uses the Trappist name, but not the logo, nor does it claim to be authentic. | |||
However, it produces a white beer, that claims to be "het enige Trappistenwitbier ter wereld" (The only Trappist-whitebeer in the world). This beer is quite new, certainly after the Bavaria takeover. So why would it claim to be a Trappist if it is not? | |||
However again, when you added the La Trappe information to the Koningshoeven article here | |||
---- | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Brouwerij_de_Koningshoeven&diff=292200404&oldid=243707510, you failed to notice that that information has been in the article since April 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Brouwerij_de_Koningshoeven&direction=next&oldid=48536689 | |||
Secondly, in your edit you wrote: "Most of its products are sold under the trade name '''La Trappe'''." However, the article has stated since 2006 that in the US the beer is called Koningshoeven (not La Trappe). I therefore wonder why you wrote "most of its products" when the largest market is not included? ] (]) 12:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Why can't everyone who is not sure that La Trappe is not a Trappist beer just check . | |||
Go to "Products", then select "Beer"... | |||
It clearly states the 6 official Trappist beers: Achel, Chimay, Orval, Rochefort, Westmalle and Westvleteren. | |||
:Who says that the US is the largest market for La Trappe? It's possible, but I wouldn't automatically assume so.--] (]) 12:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
] 11:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Considering that the US has 350million people and that it is unlikely Koningshoeven is being exported to China, it was just a guess, but I think a reasonable one. In Europe, AFAIK, it is only sold in the Netherlands (17million), the UK and possibly parts of Scandinavia. There may be very small amounts sold elsewhere (France, Italy, etc.). So, in Europe, I doubt the market is much more than 100million. Of course, there could be export to someplace I haven't thought of. ] (]) 13:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
:::The information is '''not''' in '''this''' article. As I have pointed out several tines, '''La Trappe''' in this article is a link to an article about the monastery in France. Someone looking for information on La Trappe would have to '''already know''' it was brewed by Koningshoeven. Why that simple clarification should be so objectionable is quite beyond me. ] (]) 07:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Dear all | |||
::::then why did not you write information about BRANDS produced by the different trappist breweries, instead of calling the brewery by the name of its product. Would anyone have the idea to call Brouwerij Moortgat, Brouwerij Duvel or Brouwerij Maredsous or Brouwerij Vedett (well the name of the group changed to duvel moortgat, but so many other examples can be found). It's a question of brand, so you sould start a chapter on trappist brands where all the necessary information could be given about, why not, the dozens of brands that this brewery used to brew <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
The modifications I had made on wikipedia have been changed again, I regret it, because the article became wrong again, so I had to change it again, now it is more correct. I am the author of the first site on trappist beer collecting on the web, there is now another newer version of the site : http://www.trappistbeer.net | |||
The confusion between the fact that a beer can be called a trappist beer and the wear of the "authentic trappist product" logo is one of the most common mistake in the beer lovers world... | |||
The wear of the "authentic trappist product logo" is not a proof for a beer to be a real trappist beer. Only the judgement of 1962 (court of Gent, Belgium) is still available for determining what legally is a trappist beer. The "authentic trappist product" logo is given by a private association and has NO LEGAL VALUE. | |||
Here are more detailed analysis http://www.trappistbeer.net/divers/newsletter4.htm and http://www.trappistbeer.net/tilburg/trappist2_frame2_66en.htm : I won't discuss about this analysis much, read it first then you will understand what you did not. | |||
:::::Of ocurse, at nos tage did I '''replace''' the brewery name with the brand name, so the above is psurious. | |||
SO : | |||
- checking the site of the international trappist association will not help you determining what is a trappist beer, but only what beers have the right to wear the "authentic trappist product" logo | |||
- stating that there is no discussion about La Trappe is a very short explanation for an encyclopedia : no arguments. it's wrong. | |||
:::::Writing infomration about brands is just what I am trying to do. A one point I added a brand column to the table, but of course that was reverted as well. 08:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
There are 7 trappist beers and 6 beers which have the right to wear the "authentic trappist product" (moreover, this may change in the near future...) posted by ] on June 2005, 10th | |||
:::::Let's just hope you refrain from amending the ] article to read Inbev-Marston's throughout.] (]) 08:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::your last comment is...well...hmm.... It is obvious that your attempt to add a brand colum to the table was reverted (not by me, anyway) because of its inanity. Repeating (almost 100%) of the first column in the second column brought nothing interesting, except maybe satisfying you. "repetitive material" as stated in the history. Fully agree. If at least you had written about the full ranges of trappist beers, including chimay dorée, westmalle extra, petit orval etc..., that may have given useful information... You appear to know the subject so well, so why don't you write about these beers. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
-------- | |||
Hi there, | |||
I made some modifications in the article. I hope I have not truncated any ideas from the previous article but it seemed unclear to me. I still have a problem with something : how could La Trappe wear the authentic logo as it seems to have been created in 1998 only, where the selling of La Trappe to Bavaria occurred in 1997! To me, the International thing was created in reaction to this selling... but i'm not sure of that. Anyway, i hope i've made clear the distinction between trappist beer and authentic trappist product. Let's improve the article, | |||
:::::::I agree it was repetative. I only did it that way because mikebe reverted my first edit. (Was that you above, mikebe? Please sign comments). I would be quite happy to write about including chimay dorée, westmalle extra, petit orval etc, but there is little point trying until mikebe and patto1ro are pesuaded to stop deleting all my additions. ] (]) 12:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
] 16:01, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
::::::::No that is not me writing. The person writing is another one of your edit-warring victims. When he writes "you appear to know the subject so well", you should understand what he is saying. ] (]) 14:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::::'''' : did you like them at least ? what do you think of Petit Orval ? if you don't write in the main section, your opinion is welcome here. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::::::::Thanks for the positive suggestions about how to improve the article. ] (]) 08:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
-------- | |||
==Moving On== | |||
Hi Julien | |||
Edit wars on a completely benign subject, classic wikipedia. So anyway, looking for information on Trappist Beer via Google and of course I am taken to here. Overall pretty good information on the page, but I was suprised to find no mention of the Trappist chalice type glass that is a prerequisite for drinking Trappist beer. Any plans to add this, or should I start tracking down sources? --] (]) 03:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
La Trappe does exist for many many years, well before 1998... | |||
There is absolutely no link between the creation of the international trappist association and La Trappe products. Monks of Tilburg belong to the international trappist association | |||
:I'm not sure what you are looking for. Each monastery produces its own glass, but, in Belgium, that is also true for virtually all brewers. The glass shapes have changed over the years. There is, in the external links in the article, a link to a person's glass collection. You can see there how the glasses have changed over the years. I'm not sure what else can be said about the subject. ] (]) 09:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
You should read my site first | |||
It is not a prerequisite for drinking Trappist beer. What a silly, elitist idea. ] (]) 09:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Cyril59 | |||
== Koningshoeven/ La Trappe Bock == | |||
---------- | |||
Hi Cyril, | |||
I'm no hard worker. I read a bit of your site (which seems a nice one) but you don't cite your sources on the la trappe part... For example, you should remark that the Bierbrouwerij De Koningshoeven was created in 1997 and not 1999. 1999 seems to be the year the brewery withdraw the trappist logo from their beers. About 1998 : | |||
''how could La Trappe wear the authentic logo as it seems to have been created in 1998 only'' | |||
the 'it' was obviously refering to the logo (maybe you should have read the article before writing this?). | |||
I am pretty sure that the bock bier produced at La trappe is actually an ale, but am having a hard time finding solid confirmation. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
About the Ghent tribunal part : I'm not sure this has to do with the La Trappe case. Historically, the judgement was given to avoid non-trappist abbeys to produce "trappist" beers (as it says on your site) but i'm not sure this judgement has legal meaning for products made in The Netherlands. Furthermore, it seems (but the source might not be reliable) that : | |||
: It says so on the La Trappe website: "This unique seasonal product is the world’s only Trappist bock '''ale'''." "Characteristics: Unfiltered, '''top-fermenting''', rich malty Trappist ale." | |||
''Onze gemeenschap is lid van de Orde van de Trappisten en als zodanig heeft onze gemeenschap het recht om binnen de wetgeving van onze kloosterorde, en niet die van de Internationale Vereniging Trappist, al haar producten de naam van Trappist te geven. '' (in the third reference of the article) | |||
: http://www.latrappetrappist.com/en-en/trappist-beers/la-trappe-bockbier/ | |||
which roughly means that La Trappe monks can call their beer trappist under the legislation of their order and not under that of the International Trappist Association. Indeed, the word trappist must indicate that trappist monks (or people have received the autorisation from them) brew some beer. That was precisely the meaning of the Ghent judgement but the choice of La Trappe monks was not a consequence of that judgement as there's no reason a trappist monastery couldn't call beers they produce trappist. Anyway, i would be interested in you citing your sources about the link between the 1962 judgement and the la trappe beers, and also interested in knowing more about the juridical piece. If you wish to write some lines about this here... | |||
: ] (]) 08:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Mont des cats == | |||
] 13:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Before to read more wrong information on Misplaced Pages about the beer sold by the french abbey of Sainte Marie du Mont des Cats | |||
== about all you say above == | |||
here is more information about that beer | |||
Julien | |||
After long years without beer at the Mont des Cats, the creation of a "trappist beer of the Mont des Cats" was officially announced on Thursday June 9, 2011. It is sold on the Mount since Thursday June 16, 2011. That new trappist beer is compliant to the legal criteria and definitions which were enacted by different courts of justice (notably those of Ghent and Brussels); it will be produced initially by the brewery of Chimay (Scourmont) on behalf of the abbey of the Mont des Cats. | |||
As far as I know the brewery in Tilburg was officially taken over in July 1998, I will change it on the website, as I indicated 1999, but it's not really important. The first steps of the cooperation started in 1997. | |||
The community of the Mont des Cats will take time to evaluate the opportunity of reinstalling a brewery inside the abbey (but nobody knows yet if they will do it or not). The getting of the "authentic trappist product" label could be examined by the ITA (international trappist association) in a near future. The decision to allow (or not) the beer to wear the heagonal logo will probably take months. The ITA is an association composed of various Trappists communities, which created the "Authentic Trappist Product" (ATP) label; this association is a real moral authority on the matter, without however being a legislative or jurisprudential reference. | |||
But I wonder why you try to lead a discussion on La Trappe, while the problem is that your additions and modifications on the article (about trappist beer, not La Trappe) are : wrong and confusing. I'm not interested in discussing with you about international law and the judgment of Ghent and its links with La Trappe and all these kind of things, that will be rather long and complex and probably not interesting here : it's about an article of Misplaced Pages concerning Trappist Beer, that I find very confusing since you are modifying it in a wrong way. | |||
As stated on the website of the International Trappist Association (french version) : "La 'Mont des Cats' est une bière trappiste ambrée brassée à l'abbaye de Scourmont." (The "Mont des cats" is an amber trappist beer brewed at the abbey of Scourmont). There is consequently no question as to know whether this is a trappist beer or not. It is a new brand of trappist beer which does not wear the ATP logo yet. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
By the way, whether your 'it' was refering to the La Trappe brand or to the logo, you must know that what you say is wrong, because your informations are wrong. It's then a normal conclusion that you cannot understand some things, when you have wrong informations. Moreover, you make connections between things which are not connected...that does not help you. | |||
:Since their products cannot currently be branded with the ATP logo, I am removing Mont des Cats from the table that lists breweries that are able to use the logo. ] (]) 14:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
== not clear why catholics produce alcohol == | |||
Funny the way you talk, as if you try to give me lessons...while you have written so many wrong and changing things here. | |||
"brewed beer to feed the community" - this statement is nonsensical, beer is not food. | |||
More than one time you 'corrected' right things to rewrite them wrong... Even if I do not have all the truth (who has ?) I think I had written a simple and satisfying complement of explanation based on your version of article, but you simply removed it and replaced again by wrong things... | |||
why would monks make a drink that makes people drunk? totally not clear here. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
So, as I told before, do what you want now. | |||
Just let the link to my site on the page and I will be satisfied. | |||
This is my last message in this discussion thread. I'm always opened to a direct contact by email. | |||
Adios | |||
== Spencer Trappist Ale == | |||
Cyril | |||
The monks at the Spencer Trappist monastary started selling their own ale in January of 2014. I'm not a home-brewer or an ale expert, but I do have a camera and can take pictures, so I've left a photo of my nifty new bottle of Spencer Trappist Ale here: | |||
== opinion on the new article == | |||
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:SpencerTrappistBottle-20140128.JPG | |||
I must also admit I find the new article very obscure, and imprecise | |||
almost nothing is said about trappist beer, but you speak of the ITA | |||
the previous one was more clear in my opinion | |||
I won't change the article anymore : always correcting you is tiring, you want the article to be yours while you do not know what you speak about. | |||
If any more clever people want to use it in the article. | |||
Cyril59 | |||
] (]) 23:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Sorting the table of the breweries by volume == | |||
== Oi! == | |||
I cannot code so I cant improve the sorting algorithm but as it stands the sorting by "Annual production" (least first) sorts by the characters in the string (120,000 hl appears higher up than 145,000 etc.) This should be changed. So that the sorting is correct. | |||
Can you stop having revert wars. First of all, if you edit from several anonymous IPs in this way you will be blocked. Now your source for saying that La Trappe is now going to be allowed to be called "Authentic Trappist Beer" again is apparently - not immediately obvious from the references, and apparently a website you write, so hardly a good source. I have put a verification request out to some other people, but please do not revert again without an account. ] 20:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
On a related note the volumes are old (from 2004) and could be updated. | |||
:ok, I have had the La Trappe facts verified independently by an independent expert on Belgian Beer, so I shall clean up. See ] 22:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 06:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== eleven breweries? == | |||
::Hep, just wanted to post a nice website about the history of trappists. Let's add some information from onto this one cuz i find it very well documented. And when i say this, I am aware that this site says Cyril site is one of ''Two excellent websites covering Trappist beers are: Cyril Pagniez's www.trappistbeer.net); and Danny Van Tricht's www.trappistbier.be. Note that Danny has a Message Board, devoted to Trappist Beer...''. By the way, it says ''Note that the La Trappe range of beers had the Authentic Trappist Product logo on the bottles, see below, removed in 1999, following the involvement of a large Dutch brewery called Bavaria in the brewery within the monastery. Pope John Paul II (Papa Giovanni Paulo II) (Karol Wojtyla) (1920-2005) was involved in the decision to stop Koningshoeven using the logo. Note, however, that the logo was reinstated, the monastery announced, in October, 2005.'' (I kinda like the ''the monastery announced'' by the way)... Cheers, ] 12:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
can we change it to "Elven"? Thanks. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
=== Pffff.... === | |||
== Tynt Meadow monastery == | |||
I 'll be correcting the article as long as I see wrong things inside. With you, it'll be a neverending story, and I don't have much time for this | |||
The problem is that you should stop changing correct writings to replace them by your texts, without taking the time to verify that in the end you are wrong | |||
My source was quoted in my web page : it was an information given to me by the abbey of Tilburg, many months ago, and they simply asked not to reveal it before october 2005 7th (if I remember well) : the same day, the information and sources were released on the official site of the brewery, and on many famous beer forums, and also by the ITA itself. | |||
I found it rather funny that you have asked the question to "independent beer experts"...on a web forum : a bit naive. | |||
You wrote so many wrong and false things in that article, from the very beginning, that needed to be changed again and again... | |||
In fact, I should take the time to rewrite it completely, but I am so certain that you would change it again in the wrong way, that in the end I don't know what to do exactly... | |||
Could someone more skilled than I add Tynt Meadow, a recognised Trappist monastery and brewery in Leicestershire, UK, to the list and map? ] (]) 09:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
=== Any authoritive sources? === | |||
Sorry, I posted this without logging in. I wrote this. ] (]) 09:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
I've been reading the article, history and talk page, trying to figure out what the issue here is. Seems that no one can agree what the legal situation is with regard to the ''Trappist'' name or the logo. Is the logo a legal trademark (and if so, where?) and is the word ''Trappist'' a trademark? Until this is verifiable, the article should not state either is true. The only thing that I see is pretty certain is that the use of the logo itself is legally protected (either by court order or possible trademark). La Trappe used the trappist name whilst not using the logo, so obviously the standing of each does differ. ] 21:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Stift Engelszell will be closed, add reference please == | |||
==1666== | |||
Following an anonymous and strange edit I would like to confirm that the Trappist order was founded in the 1660s and not two centuries later as the anonymous user sais, at least if you trusr the ] (few sources) and ] articles. ] 17:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Indeed...I've done a lot of research lately on the Trappists and their beers and everything (including the order's official page) states the 17th century. It sure was a strange edit though. ] 20:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Could you please add it to the references? | |||
==1.666, the number of the beast......== | |||
https://www.stift-engelszell.at/aktuelles/# | |||
The trappist order was founded December 8th 1892. The trappist order was not founded in the 1660's, it's just a community that decided to follow a stricter observance that was founded in the 1660's, at that time it was certainly not an Order, not even a Congregation...So, if you've done a lot of research, you failed to find the right information, or more probably you did not look at the right place.... | |||
https://assets.sta.io/site_media/u/newsitem/2023/05/10/StiftEngelszell10052023_WAtQXhL.pdf ] (]) 07:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
But it is now very common to read wrong things here. (the "trappist" article on wikipedia should be deleted as it is wrong) | |||
And about the wear of the logo, things are perfectly clear for quite a while. The logo originates from the ITA, and only the ITA can decide who can wear it or not, following the defined rules. And for the trappist name for beer, justice and lawyers had to take decisions about it many years ago, in Belgium, as well as in the USA. | |||
== what about the beer? == | |||
All this discussion about the Trappist monks is good, but what about the beer? Could someone describe the beer perhaps? Is trappist one kind of beer or do they vary? Is anything known about the brewing methods? If someone who is not a monk made a Trappist-style beer, what would you call it? I think this article is missing a description of the actual subject. If I knew about Trappists, I'd add, but I don't hence the request. | |||
I'm trying. I'm trying.] 12:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== errr == | |||
Is trappist one kind of beer or do they vary? : trappist is not a style, so they vary (blond to black colors, bockbier, white beer...., top or low fermentation, hoppy or not, 4% to 12% alc/vol, they do vary.) | |||
. | |||
If someone who is not a monk made a Trappist-style beer, what would you call it? : well,.... trappist is not a style. | |||
. | |||
I think this article is missing a description of the actual subject. : well if you read it carefully, the essential is said, because trappist beer is not a style of beer | |||
== Types of beer == | |||
The current section is a mass of confusing detail, POV, and over-generalisation. It pushes the POV that there are no Trappist styles, although Dubbel and Tripel arev recognised as styles by authorities like Tim Webb and Michael Jackson. I will re-write if references are not provided ] 12:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== you cannot be serious == | |||
- : I quote : "Replace Tilburg with the name more familiar int eh English speaking world". This is ******. Replacing the name of Tilburg with La Trappe is such a mistake ! This is the abbey/brewery of Tilburg (Berkel Enschot), end of story. The word La Trappe is related to a commercial brand. The only "La Trappe" abbey that we know is located in France. I will remove these words as they are so wrong. | |||
- : you ask for a citation for the fact that "trappist monks have labeled their beers with a very wide range of different appellations that have nothing in common". But, READ, it is indicated that all the necessary references (or pictures of the trappist labels) can be consulted on some of the websites quoted below. | |||
- : Trappist in itself is not a style nor a type, it is such an evidence. You should learn and read more about beer, and/or trappist beer to understand that. Trappist is just an appelation; a kind of appellation of controled origin; nothing more. The old article (which was defining styles as single/dubbel/trippel/quadrupel) was the one which was over confusing. I don' see any other way to seriously classify trappist beers simply by following the different types of beers they belong to (ale, white, bock, pilsner....) and their content of alcohol (+ a description of their color, why not). The only true references that can be provided are the ones given by the trappist themselves, on the labels of their beers. Where will you classify orval, wvl blond, la trappe white just ot name a few in your dubbel/trippel classification ?? |
Latest revision as of 13:13, 26 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trappist beer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edit war
Would all involved parties be so kind to stop reverting and start to discuss their views here? I'm sure all sides have good arguments and a concensus can be reached.--Fogeltje (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- OK: it would be helpful to the ordinary reader to have the brewery at Koningshoeven linked to the brand name by which its beers are generally known. 1Z (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- But, it's not a brewery AT Koningshoeven...you should know that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.170.13 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 4 June 2009 (CEST)
- It would be useful if you signed you comment.1Z (talk) 18:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe the location could be mentioned in the article as well. encyclopedia articles are supposed to contain useful information, they are not supposed to be arenas for testing other people's knowlege of obscure arcana. 1Z (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
feel free to modify the article yourself...
- if only I could...1Z (talk) 00:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- why can't you ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.170.13 (talk) 06:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Peter, this is a general article about Trappist beer. It is also not mentioned, for example, that Chimay is not brewed by a monastery called Chimay. None of the breweries listed contain specific information about them. However, when you click on the brewery name, you come to an article about the brewery where specific information is perfectly valid.
However again, when you added the La Trappe information to the Koningshoeven article here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Brouwerij_de_Koningshoeven&diff=292200404&oldid=243707510, you failed to notice that that information has been in the article since April 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Brouwerij_de_Koningshoeven&direction=next&oldid=48536689
Secondly, in your edit you wrote: "Most of its products are sold under the trade name La Trappe." However, the article has stated since 2006 that in the US the beer is called Koningshoeven (not La Trappe). I therefore wonder why you wrote "most of its products" when the largest market is not included? Mikebe (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Who says that the US is the largest market for La Trappe? It's possible, but I wouldn't automatically assume so.--Fogeltje (talk) 12:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Considering that the US has 350million people and that it is unlikely Koningshoeven is being exported to China, it was just a guess, but I think a reasonable one. In Europe, AFAIK, it is only sold in the Netherlands (17million), the UK and possibly parts of Scandinavia. There may be very small amounts sold elsewhere (France, Italy, etc.). So, in Europe, I doubt the market is much more than 100million. Of course, there could be export to someplace I haven't thought of. Mikebe (talk) 13:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- The information is not in this article. As I have pointed out several tines, La Trappe in this article is a link to an article about the monastery in France. Someone looking for information on La Trappe would have to already know it was brewed by Koningshoeven. Why that simple clarification should be so objectionable is quite beyond me. 1Z (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- then why did not you write information about BRANDS produced by the different trappist breweries, instead of calling the brewery by the name of its product. Would anyone have the idea to call Brouwerij Moortgat, Brouwerij Duvel or Brouwerij Maredsous or Brouwerij Vedett (well the name of the group changed to duvel moortgat, but so many other examples can be found). It's a question of brand, so you sould start a chapter on trappist brands where all the necessary information could be given about, why not, the dozens of brands that this brewery used to brew —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.170.13 (talk) 05:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Of ocurse, at nos tage did I replace the brewery name with the brand name, so the above is psurious.
- Writing infomration about brands is just what I am trying to do. A one point I added a brand column to the table, but of course that was reverted as well. 08:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Let's just hope you refrain from amending the Bass (beer) article to read Inbev-Marston's throughout.1Z (talk) 08:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- your last comment is...well...hmm.... It is obvious that your attempt to add a brand colum to the table was reverted (not by me, anyway) because of its inanity. Repeating (almost 100%) of the first column in the second column brought nothing interesting, except maybe satisfying you. "repetitive material" as stated in the history. Fully agree. If at least you had written about the full ranges of trappist beers, including chimay dorée, westmalle extra, petit orval etc..., that may have given useful information... You appear to know the subject so well, so why don't you write about these beers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.255.1.93 (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree it was repetative. I only did it that way because mikebe reverted my first edit. (Was that you above, mikebe? Please sign comments). I would be quite happy to write about including chimay dorée, westmalle extra, petit orval etc, but there is little point trying until mikebe and patto1ro are pesuaded to stop deleting all my additions. 1Z (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- No that is not me writing. The person writing is another one of your edit-warring victims. When he writes "you appear to know the subject so well", you should understand what he is saying. Mikebe (talk) 14:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- : did you like them at least ? what do you think of Petit Orval ? if you don't write in the main section, your opinion is welcome here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.170.13 (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the positive suggestions about how to improve the article. 1Z (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Moving On
Edit wars on a completely benign subject, classic wikipedia. So anyway, looking for information on Trappist Beer via Google and of course I am taken to here. Overall pretty good information on the page, but I was suprised to find no mention of the Trappist chalice type glass that is a prerequisite for drinking Trappist beer. Any plans to add this, or should I start tracking down sources? --Coldbourne (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you are looking for. Each monastery produces its own glass, but, in Belgium, that is also true for virtually all brewers. The glass shapes have changed over the years. There is, in the external links in the article, a link to a person's glass collection. You can see there how the glasses have changed over the years. I'm not sure what else can be said about the subject. Mikebe (talk) 09:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
It is not a prerequisite for drinking Trappist beer. What a silly, elitist idea. Jezbrews (talk) 09:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Koningshoeven/ La Trappe Bock
I am pretty sure that the bock bier produced at La trappe is actually an ale, but am having a hard time finding solid confirmation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolethebeertender (talk • contribs) 10:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- It says so on the La Trappe website: "This unique seasonal product is the world’s only Trappist bock ale." "Characteristics: Unfiltered, top-fermenting, rich malty Trappist ale."
- http://www.latrappetrappist.com/en-en/trappist-beers/la-trappe-bockbier/
- 81.216.199.74 (talk) 08:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Mont des cats
Before to read more wrong information on Misplaced Pages about the beer sold by the french abbey of Sainte Marie du Mont des Cats here is more information about that beer
After long years without beer at the Mont des Cats, the creation of a "trappist beer of the Mont des Cats" was officially announced on Thursday June 9, 2011. It is sold on the Mount since Thursday June 16, 2011. That new trappist beer is compliant to the legal criteria and definitions which were enacted by different courts of justice (notably those of Ghent and Brussels); it will be produced initially by the brewery of Chimay (Scourmont) on behalf of the abbey of the Mont des Cats.
The community of the Mont des Cats will take time to evaluate the opportunity of reinstalling a brewery inside the abbey (but nobody knows yet if they will do it or not). The getting of the "authentic trappist product" label could be examined by the ITA (international trappist association) in a near future. The decision to allow (or not) the beer to wear the heagonal logo will probably take months. The ITA is an association composed of various Trappists communities, which created the "Authentic Trappist Product" (ATP) label; this association is a real moral authority on the matter, without however being a legislative or jurisprudential reference.
As stated on the website of the International Trappist Association (french version) : "La 'Mont des Cats' est une bière trappiste ambrée brassée à l'abbaye de Scourmont." (The "Mont des cats" is an amber trappist beer brewed at the abbey of Scourmont). There is consequently no question as to know whether this is a trappist beer or not. It is a new brand of trappist beer which does not wear the ATP logo yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.170.13 (talk) 08:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Since their products cannot currently be branded with the ATP logo, I am removing Mont des Cats from the table that lists breweries that are able to use the logo. Steamroller Assault (talk) 14:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
not clear why catholics produce alcohol
"brewed beer to feed the community" - this statement is nonsensical, beer is not food.
why would monks make a drink that makes people drunk? totally not clear here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.95.229 (talk) 08:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Spencer Trappist Ale
The monks at the Spencer Trappist monastary started selling their own ale in January of 2014. I'm not a home-brewer or an ale expert, but I do have a camera and can take pictures, so I've left a photo of my nifty new bottle of Spencer Trappist Ale here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:SpencerTrappistBottle-20140128.JPG
If any more clever people want to use it in the article. Mcvoorhis (talk) 23:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorting the table of the breweries by volume
I cannot code so I cant improve the sorting algorithm but as it stands the sorting by "Annual production" (least first) sorts by the characters in the string (120,000 hl appears higher up than 145,000 etc.) This should be changed. So that the sorting is correct. On a related note the volumes are old (from 2004) and could be updated. GregorDS (talk) 06:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by GregorDS (talk • contribs) 06:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
eleven breweries?
can we change it to "Elven"? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:2787:3800:3CD3:ECE4:1D77:2573 (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Tynt Meadow monastery
Could someone more skilled than I add Tynt Meadow, a recognised Trappist monastery and brewery in Leicestershire, UK, to the list and map? 212.228.96.41 (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I posted this without logging in. I wrote this. Jezbrews (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Stift Engelszell will be closed, add reference please
Could you please add it to the references? https://www.stift-engelszell.at/aktuelles/# https://assets.sta.io/site_media/u/newsitem/2023/05/10/StiftEngelszell10052023_WAtQXhL.pdf Uzik (talk) 07:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories: