User talk:Raul654: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:47, 10 August 2007 view sourceMercury~enwiki (talk \| contribs)9,783 edits →Topic ban: re AN← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 02:05, 23 December 2024 view source Yedaman54 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users13,465 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=April 2023}}
	<div style="float:right;width:150px;margin:2em;padding:1em;">		<div style="float:right;width:150px;margin:2em;padding:1em;">
	<center>		<center>
	] up-to-date, for doing the grunt work of cleaning up ], for mediating in disputes, for adding lots of really nice pictures, and for still finding the time to work on articles! In a few months you've already become a highly valued member of the community. Stay with us and don't burn out, please. --Eloquence Apr 10, 2004]]		] up-to-date, for doing the grunt work of cleaning up ], for mediating in disputes, for adding lots of really nice pictures, and for still finding the time to work on articles! In a few months you've already become a highly valued member of the community. Stay with us and don't burn out, please. --Eloquence Apr 10, 2004]]
	<br/>		<br/>
	</center>		</center>
	</div>		</div>

			] (]) 10:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)]]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]

			{{Col-begin}}
	== Your comment at Bishop Henry ==
			{{Col-break}}
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			{{Col-break}}
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]
			* ]

			{{col-end}}
	I was delighted that you stepped in to directly advise a nominator in that way. Doing that from time to time is probably a powerful way of keeping discipline. <font color="midnightblue">]</font> 15:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
			{{Boxboxtop\|}}
			{{Boxboxbottom}}

			== Did you retire from Misplaced Pages? ==
	==Withdrawing a nomination==
	I am been flirting with the idea of withdrawing my nomination of ]. Is that even possible, and, if so, how would I go about doing it? --<font size="3" face="Colonna MT">] (] ¤ ])</font> 18:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Yes, it's possible, and you do it by asking here on my talk page. ] 18:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

			Did you retire from Misplaced Pages? Is all well? ] (]) 03:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
	== Advice as to how to proceed on the article on Food Irradiation. ==

			:Hi there. All is well. I'm just not very active here these days. (I don't have nearly as much free time as I did before the kids came along). ] (]) 08:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
	I would like to hear your advice as to how to proceed on a current deadlock on the article on ]. After an edit war the article was blocked and heavily discussed on its talk page each fraction accusing the other of NPOV violations. Personal attacks were common and the ] was brought in for mediation. The mediation page http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Food_irradiation/Mediation_discussion was created and the only user ] who presented a differing viewpoint to the rest of the group abandoned mediation citing lack of experience and bias of the mediator. The underlying issue as I see it is that either party feels that the other would like to guve undue weight to a minority position. There are also issues with out of context citations etc. on the article. My question to you is if you feel if formal mediation might be a helpful step prior to asking for abribitration or if there is additional steps that we might pursue. My gut feeling is that there is a lack of good faith assumption on either side of the debate. Thanks for your advice. ] 19:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
			::{{u\|Raul654}}, we will welcome you back in 18 years ;) —] (] • ]) 10:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

			== Greetings of the season ==
	== ] ==

			{\| style="border: 1px solid plum; background-color: #A3BFB1;"
	Why was this AfD closed within one day (more specificlly, 15 hours from inception to your closing)? If i'm not mistaken the deletion policy states it must run for a full 5 days before the votes are tallyed and then closed. I am most confused.--] 11:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
			\|rowspan="2" valign="middle" \| {{multiple image\|perrow=2/1\|total_width=360\|caption_align=center
	:In a case like that (where there is an overwhelming sentiment one way or the other) we don't have to wait the full 5 days. ] 14:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			\| align = left
			\| image_style = border:none;
			\| image1 = John William Waterhouse - I am half-sick of shadows, said the lady of shalott.JPG
			\| image2= Candle on Christmas tree 3.jpg
			\| footer= '']''
			}}
			\|rowspan="2" \|
			\|style="font-size: large; color: white; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" \| '''Happy holidays'''
			\|-
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid White;" \|<font color =White> Dear Mark, <br /><br />For you and all your loved ones,<br /><br /><font color =White>.
			<br />
			Wishing you health,<br />peace and happiness <br /> this holiday season and <br />in the coming year. <br /><br />] (]) 00:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
			\|}

			:Hey Sandy! Great to here for you. I hope all is well. :) ] (]) 08:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
	== ] ==
			:: Same to you ... Happy New Year! ] (]) 10:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I and a few others are proposing an alteration to the number of edits that must be made prior to being able to edit semi-protected articles. That is, the number of edits a user must make prior to being auto confirmed. Currently it's 0 and having it set to about 30 would drastically improve the protection of semi-protected articles from vandals while at the same time increasing openness due to less articles having to be fully protected due to repeat offenders. Check out the talk page and add come comments, ]. We're trying to get attention to it, it has a consensus but nothing is happening. Thanks. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
	== Your old user page design ==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 07:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

			== Request to remove full protection ==
	I just wanted to let you know that I am using your <span class="plainlinks"></span>, if you want you can look at the wiki code and point out any mistakes. I mainly came here to ask you for advice on how to '''find''' and fight vandalism. ]] 23:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

			Hello, you had full protected the page ] over 15 years ago. It is no longer necessary to keep it full protected since it not displayed on main page anymore. I request you to downgrade the protection level to Semi protection or unprotection. Thanks. ] (]) 03:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
	== :( ==
			==Happy Birthday!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%; padding-bottom: 1em;">Happy Birthday!</span>]
			Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

			Best wishes, ]<sup>]</sup> 22:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
	] ] 01:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			</div>
	:That's very upsetting. I've emailed ALoan about it. ] 14:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			==Orphaned non-free image File:Foundation and empire cover.jpg==
			] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

			Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
	== Nick change ==
			==MfD nomination of ]==
			] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 12:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

			== Administrators will no longer be ] ==
	Hi! I'm ]. Could you change my nickname usurping the ] account? It seems he's no longer active. Thank you. --] 12:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Answered on user's talk page. --] <small>]</small> 12:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

			A ] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove ] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with ], choose to ] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the ]. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
	== ] ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 -->
	The page formatting at FA Statistics is messed up. Someone changed it, I changed it back, s/he changed it back. Maybe you know how to fix it? ] (]) 18:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	:HTML/CSS is one language I don't know well (or two languages if you want to be picky) I asked in IRC and Reinsis fixed it. I think it's acceptable now. ] 18:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	::Except it's now completely missing the template, fapages, which is used on all FA pages (and was causing the problem). I'm sure they'll work it out. ] (]) 18:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::It wasn't missing - you may need to scroll right to see it if your browser window isn't wide enough. ] 18:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::Yep, now it's way off my monitor :-) ] (]) 18:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::There's really only two ways to fix it - either have it aligned next to the table (and some people will need to scroll over to the right to see it), or have it at the top of the stats page, above the table, on the right side of the screen. The problem is, if we do it the latter way, there's a huge empty space on the left side of the table. ] 18:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

			== A somewhat premature New Year's greeting ==
	== Closing notes ==
			{\| style="border:2px ; background-color: #A45953;"
	Raul, are the closing reminders (e.g.; ]) helpful? For example, ] has already been on the main page, so when you add it back to ] it needs the main page template. Since many are coming back, I thought the notes would help you keep them straight as you add them back to ], so we don't have a repeat of (I think it was?) ], which got re-scheduled for the main page, even though it had already appeared. We've got two more coming through soon. I'm going to correct Io moon now at ]. ] (]) 19:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			\|rowspan="2" valign="right" \| ]<br><sup>John Vanderlyn, ''Ariadne Asleep on the Island of Naxos'' (c.1812),<br>]</sup>
	:Jaguar was the one that got rescheduled for the main page.
			\|rowspan="2" \|
	:I didn't realize Io had a reminder (I didn't know to look for it, so my eyes just glanced over the red text). Yes, those are helpful, but with so many coming back, I'm bound to make mistakes. ] 19:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" \| '''Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2022.'''
	::OK, I'll keep adding the reminders, but also keep an eye open as a backup. I fixed Io (moon). ] is at FAC now, and ] is coming back soon. ] (]) 19:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
			\|-
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid black;" \|'''Thank you for your contributions toward making Misplaced Pages a better and more accurate place.'''<br>] (]) 21:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)<br><br>'''Moral lesson:''' ] was an American painter who studied in Paris, and his life-sized<br>''Ariadne Asleep on the Island of Naxos'' was one of the first large nudes exhibited in the United States.<br>Peddling the poison as well as the cure, this overtly sensuous work was presented to the public as a<br>moral lesson on the consequences of ]. Visible in the distance is the ship of<br>Princess ]'s secret lover, ], for whom she has betrayed her people by helping him to<br>escape the ] and slay the ]. Ariadne's bliss will come to an end when she awakens<br>from her post-coital reverie, only to discover that the faithless Theseus has sailed away without her.
			\|}
			{{clear}}

	== A ~~Small~~ ~~Number~~ of ~~Individual~~ ~~Scientists~~ ==		== How we will see unregistered users ==

			<section begin=content/>
	I looked through the talk archives on Global Warming and saw that this issue has been discussed extensively, although the best description I can give as to the resolution was that it appeared to be another "the foot has spoken" scenario on the part of some familiar users. I was particularly interested by some actions taken by William M. Connolley in the course of the discussion .
			Hi!

			You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
	I'm not pointing any fingers, but I was just wondering how many credible scientists would need to be on that list before it no longer qualified for the 'few' descriptor. For 37 people, it just seems inappropriate to me. ~ ]<small><sup>(]\|])</sup></small> 01:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Given that previous discussions have pegged the number of people who could reasonably be called climatologists in the 10,000-20,000 range, 37 out of that number (0.37% or 0.185%) is a vanishingly small number. "A few" is, frankly, giving too much credit to point of view held by a trivial (but very vocal) few. ] 01:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::Point taken. Would you happen to know the exact number of signatures on the IPCC assessment? Since the article rightly focuses so heavily on the findings of the IPCC, perhaps that would be a more reliable number to weigh them against over a rough estimate. ~ ]<small><sup>(]\|])</sup></small> 01:37, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::I don't know the exact number, but if you include both authors and reviewers, it's huge - in the thousands (in other words, a very statistically significant portion of all the climatologists in the world) ] 01:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::: says there are "hundreds" of authors, reviewers, and contributors; not tens of thousands or even thousands (page 3). That's a pretty major statistical discrepancy, and I think it's safe to say the issue needs further research. In the meantime, I'll see what I can find in terms of solid numbers on the IPCC's website. ~ ]<small><sup>(]\|])</sup></small> 01:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::: they refer to it as thousands. ] 01:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::::It looks like the IPCC is in a little bit of disagreement with itself, then.
	::::::The wikipedia article on the ] says there were about 600 authors and 640 reviewers (still looking for exact totals, though). That's still a far cry from tens of thousands. I'll keep looking for a solid number or (better) a list.
	::::::I promise not to edit war or push for undue weight, but if reliable numbers can be found, it would be crazy not to include them. A solid reference outlining how many contributors signed on to the IPCC assessment (and possibly a ratio comparing the number of skeptics which meet all qualifications for inclusion) would make a good addition to the article. Numbers, even approximates, are better than weasel words. ~ ]<small><sup>(]\|])</sup></small> 02:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::I don't know where you're getting this "tens of thousands" number for the IPCC. The 1200 number does seem about right though. The IPCC is (by a wide margin) the most authoritative document in climatology. And, for that matter, I can't think of anything that authoritative in any other field either. ] 02:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::::::I was referring to your prior estimate, but beyond that, it would still be a valid addition to the article. I'll run the signature list past you if I find it. But still, 2.25% of scientists being skeptics (with the present ratio of 37/1240) is not completely insignificant. ~ ]<small><sup>(]\|])</sup></small> 02:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::::Participants don't formally "sign on" to the IPCC reports, except maybe at the highest levels (I was a contributing author for the TAR and AR4). There are various levels of authorship plus the reviewers but formal approval is at the governmental level. Note also that there seems to be a little confusion above between the number of IPCC participants and the total number of climate scientists; the latter obviously is much larger than the former. Your 2.25% figure is off, because you're comparing the ''total'' number of dissenters on the page (some of whom are not involved in climate, and others of whom can only be called "scientists" in the most charitable use of the terms) with a ''subset'' of climate scientists. As far as I can see IPCC participation is broadly representative of the community and does include some of the skeptics, such as Lindzen and Christy. ] 02:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
	==Quick review==
	As a neophyte admin I'd appreciate a quick check on my handling of this. . In a strict sense the guy did violate 3RR, but given the infantile behavior of all concerned I thought it best to either block everyone or no one. Thanks. ] 02:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on ] to help.
	:FWIW I thought what you did was entirely sensible; and once you've decided to protect the article the an individual block (which is supposed to be preventative not punative) was unnecessary. --] ] 08:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			If you have not seen it before, you can ]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can ] to ].
	==Re:Your message==
	I was unaware of their counterproductive nature, and I apologize. ] 02:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			We have ] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can ]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
	==Why are you reveting?==
	Curps may actually be dead. We should look into this more, though. ] 02:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Because, to be blunt, you're a user whose been here 5 days and made less than 2 dozen edits. I don't believe you. ] 02:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::This is my new Misplaced Pages life. I have in truth been here for a very long time. I've just has a bad past, I was here back when Curps was editing, and I'm here to report his possible death. ] 03:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::I requests his account be blocked for now, but if he e-mails us and says the email was false, he should be unblocked. ] 03:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Raul654, I have reported this claim to the noticeboard. -] 03:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			Thank you.
	== FAC of ] ==
			/]<section end=content/>

			18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
	Dear Raul,
			<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(2)&oldid=22532495 -->
	I am writing you to ask you to re-open (or re-initiate, I am unfamiliar with FAC protocol) the candidacy for ]. Prior to being closed last night, a fellow editor and me finished what we thought was a revision of the article that addressed all the concerns raised earlier and posted a notice. After posting, one of the two opposing editors withdrew his opposition since his concerns have been addressed, and according to a quick chat at LuciferMorgan's ], he has only some minor concerns left. Please reconsider, and contact me, or other involved parties if you need further information. A big thanks! ] ] 10:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:Hi, I hope you have the time to take another look at the FAC, and restart it, if possible. Contact me if you have any doubts. Greetings and thanks! ] ] 11:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

			== New administrator activity requirement ==
	== Please have a look ==
	Raul (or an admin) please have a look; I hesitate to intervene. {{user\|Green Owl}} just added two FACs, already ] that hasn't been addressed, and is entering very strange comments throughout ]. For example, can the comment at ] be removed? ] (]) 17:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			{{ivmbox\|The administrator policy has been updated with new ] following a successful ].
	:I'm not an admin. I independently noticed the Autism comment and just now asked ] about it. Something strange is going on there all right. ] 17:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::And, regular editors are requesting that The Simpsons be withdrawn. ] (]) 17:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::FYI, ''Bisognerebbe'' is Italian. ] 17:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
	::::Yes, most of his edit summaries are Italian. He withdrew The Simpsons, but archived Eubulides' question about Autism. ] (]) 17:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

			Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
	==Environmental Record Task Force==
			#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
	Hi Mark,<br>
			#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
	Thanks for your support re: ]. Given your interests and edit history, I'm hoping you might be be interested in signing up with this task force several editors have recently started. Come by and have a look!
	{{ertf invite}}] 01:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

			Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
	== Restarted nomination ==
			}}
			22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 -->

			== FAR for Battle of Dien Bien Phu ==
	I notice that you have "restarted" my nomination of ] for FA status. As this is only my second-ever FA nom, I am not sure exactly what this means or why it was done. I'm not necessarily opposed to the action; I'd just like some clarification on what it means. Thanks. ] 13:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
	:It means the old nomination had a lot of back-and-forth discussion, and it was difficult for me to tell what the outstanding objections were. So all the old supports and objections are wiped away, and the nomination starts out fresh. People are free to bring up their old objections, if they think they are still pertinent. ] 13:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
	::I understand and agree with that decision. I was just trying to see if I need to re-add my support, or if restarting disqualified those who expressed opinions in the original nomination or what. Thanks for the restart then. ] 13:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

			I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] <sub> '']''</sub> 18:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
	== Aug 9 TFA ==
			==Happy Birthday!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div style="display: flex; align-items: center; min-height: 100px; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;">] '''Wishing ] a very happy birthday on behalf of the ]!'''   <span style="background:#000dff; padding:2px;">''']]''' </span> 00:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)</div>
			==Happy Birthday!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\|type = notice
			\|image = ]
			\|style = border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: #f8eaba;
			\|text = Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the ]! Have a great day, '''Raul654'''! --''''']''''' ] 06:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
			}}
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
	Hey Raul, looks like the article chosen for August 9 has already been featured. This is according to ] and ]. -- ] / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 15:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
	:D'OH. Thanks for letting me know. ] 15:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
	:: No Problem, just doing my... job, I guess? lol -- ] / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 15:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

			<blockquote>Draft:Nambla pending. The AfC draft is about a place in Jammu & Kashmir, India.</blockquote>
	== CM Punk ==

			Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
	Hey, I notice you are the one who decides what featured articles become Misplaced Pages's daily featured article. I'm really curious about that, because my little peeve is the History of Professional Wrestling, and I've joined a WikiProject called WikiProject ProWrestling. An article, called ] was recently added to Featured Article status, and it is well-referenced, clear, and passed all the criteria. However, I feel that the article is really a disappointment, because the editors who obsessively added enough references to get it together and reach FA still made it too arcane, uninteresting, and esoteric for me to read, and I'm a wrestling fan. Essentially, they got the facts right, but the subject is really not important, relevant, or known to many people.

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Nambla\|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> <sub><span style="color:#2C5E1A; font-style: italic">- Signed by </span></sub>] <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
	My question is as follows:
	how do you deal with that? What if a group of complete nerds put together an article on World of Warcraft or some anime title that you know has a very limited appeal? Do you put that on the "Today's FA" or can you scoff it off? I'm sure some of those guys probably get up your ass about not having anyone read their boring page because you won't put it up, and they think it is the coolest thing in the world. Like, I'm curious, because I've seen nothing but interesting FAs, including Ben Franklin, historical figures, science, and i'm wondering about these "FAs that shouldn't be" (at least in my mind.)

			== A kitten for you! ==
	As you can probably guess, I admire your job, because I would have a difficult time compromising a website's respectability for the demands of complete losers.
	--] ] 02:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

			]
	==omgs==
			Hey look! A kitten!
	{{{icon\|] }}}This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br> If you ] Misplaced Pages again, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 15:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

	~~<nowiki>~~:~~-p</nowiki>~~ ] 15:13, 3 August ~~2007~~ (UTC)		] (]) 20:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
			<br style="clear: both;"/>
			==Happy Nineteenth First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{\| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;"
			\| style="text-align:center;" \|]
			\| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"\|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:darkblue">Hey, '''Raul654'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the ]!<br />Have a great day!</span> <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 14:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
			\| style="text-align:right;" \|]
			\|}

			== ] under Featured Article Review ==
	== Elonka ==

			I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
	Thanks for the note, Mark. It was clearly no consensus. Less than 70% (by me, even if it were less than 75%) and so many firm and elaborated opposes can hardly be called consensus. I wanted to close this one quickly as the amazing rancor of the "camps" needed to have a period put to it, at least in terms of the RfA. Cheers, ] 15:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	==Ornithology question==
			<blockquote>'''Consensus has been established via discussion at ] and previous AfDs/PRODs that individual ]s are not presumed notable in the same way as natural species, and must meet GNG to have a standalone article. Database and commercial catalog entries are not considered sufficient for this purpose. I did not find any reliable in-depth non-commercial non-database independent significant coverage of this cultivar.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Hi Mark--can't see the bird but I think I recognize the song. Is ]? It has that stink of "banned user" and it's Comcast from Houston. Just curious, since when I'm blocking banned users I like it if I know. Cheers, ] ] 23:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Very likely a banned user. If memory serves, Enviroknot liked to use TOR, so I can't say if it's him or not. ] 02:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==FAC==

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> &spades;]&spades; ] 21:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
	Hello. According to ] talk page, you're overseeing its ]. I have two questions. First, is there enough consensus now to give it FA status? And second, how much longer is the discussion going to continue?

			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	Thank you. ] 15:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	:Also, I was unaware that being a Featured Article and being on the Main Page were not the same (I was under the impression that once an article acquired FA status, it joined some sort of "waiting list" or something to appear on the MP). So, if the article does acquire FA status, is there some sort of waiting period or something between the FA passing and requesting it appear on the main page? ] 17:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2022\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Request ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	I'd just like to request a ] related featured article for Monday. like ], or ]--] <sup>]</sup> 18:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
	:The 13th (the date I presume you are talking about) has already been requested for Maximus the Confessor. ] 14:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

			</div>
	== ] ==
			</div>
	Hello, could you do us all a big favour ? Replace the featured picture (the Brussels chamber) by ]. Strasbourg is the official seat of the Parliament and the building is the larger of the two. More infos here : ]. Thank you ! ] 19:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->
			==Happy Nineteenth Adminship Anniversary!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div style="display: flex; align-items: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;">] <div>Wishing ''']''' a very on behalf of the ''']'''! <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 21:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)</div></div>
			==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = Happy Adminship
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, Honeydew 30%, Honeydew 70%, AliceBlue);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your . Enjoy this special day! ]<sup>]</sup> 22:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
			}}

			== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder ==
	== A Problem ==

			]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
	Hi there; I am a fairly new admin, and have been approached with a problem which I am not competent to handle. I threw it at ], being a bureaucrat with whom I have interacted, and he suggested I should contact you.

			== Happy New Year, Raul654! ==
	The problem: we have a vandal who appears to have an unlimited access to a range of PCs; I am of course aware that an indeiscriminate range block will do a vast amount of collateral damage, probabnly in excess of the benefit achieved. The problem was brought to me by ], and if you would look at ] you will appreciate the nature and degree of the problem. Whether there is antthing positive that can be done, I know not. Obviously I can block and delete as new things appear, but that does not prevent persistent new IP vandalism. Any help that you can give would, I know, be much appreciated by the three editors who have spent about three months fighting this guy. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 22:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
			<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

			]]
	== Political correctness ==
			{{Paragraph break}}

			{{Center\|{{resize\|179%\|''''']!'''''}}}}
	I wonder if you'd mind taking a look at ]. From my perspective, this article was in pretty good shape until recently, but has come under attack from a couple of determined POV-pushers, similar to problems encountered in quite a few articles where I've seen and appreciated your contributions. Of course, YMMV. ] 08:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
			'''Raul654''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. See ].

			<br /><span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 18:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)<br /><br />
	== NYC meetup reminder ==
			</div>
			''{{resize\|88%\|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls\|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
			{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 18:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the ], by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
	Hi. On the page for the upcoming New York City meetup on Sunday, you requested that someone give you a reminder when the date was getting closer, so here it is. Regards, ] 14:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
			* It is a disambiguation page which either: disambiguate only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguate zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title. (See ].)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Jack+Parr\|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. ] (]) 20:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
	== Lost FAC ==

			== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
	I left an example about the peacock terms that I keep finding by just scanning the article. I've been working a lot, and school just finished for me so I had not had a chance to give a thorough review, only skim the surface. I'll try and read the entire article this evening so that I can give a more detailed analysis for you. ] ] 18:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

	== August ==
	Just a note, according to his talk page, Tony1 is gone for a week, so won't be able to resolve his Opposes. Most of the people who could GimmeBotify the promotions/archives are not going to be available as we get into August; seems just about everyone has something going on. I can try to keep up manually, but I will be on a dialup on and off through mid-Sept. Any ideas? Unless you know someone who can pitch in manually for a few weeks, maybe we could go back to temporarily using the old templates (facfailed, etc.) until Gimmetrow's hopefully back on board full-time. ] (]) 18:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Yes, we can use the old tags until Gimmetrow comes back. Alternatively, for the time being, I'm more than competent to operate the bot if someone does mind giving me some basic instructions. ] 18:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
	::I tried something new with this batch: I added the star on promoted, and a facfailed template on not promoted, with an edit summary that a bot would update the talk page. Hopefully, that will eliminate confusion if there's any delay in articlehistory botification. Gimmetrow's situation isn't yet clear; will try this for a while and see how it goes. ] (]) 18:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
	::: Replacing fac with facfailed caused some problems with ]. ] 02:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
	::::Not a good idea? ] (]) 02:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
	::: As the bot is currently written, no. The part which deals with a page with a missing "fac" template has parts commented out. I'm guessing there were situations where people removed "fac" without adding "facfailed", and if an older "facfailed" existed the bot was grabbing that instead. I've uncommented that code for now to see what happens next round. ] 02:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

			]
	== August 2007 ==
			Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of June 2023.
	{{{icon\|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from ]. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Misplaced Pages without a good reason, which should be specified in the ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ''] Thank you.'' ] 18:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
	:I left the guy a note about calling good faith edits vandalism. He however removed the message. ] ] 18:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

			Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
	== Main page requests ==

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
	With regards to the main page request for Aston villa; looking at Arsenal F.C.'s ] i saw it wasn't neccessarily an action shot.(although i do now notice it is quite an old main page article) Would ] be appropriate? it shows history of Villa, European Cup, etc and is equivalent to Arsenal F.C's celebratory shot, albeit not a current team picture though. thanks for your consideration. ] 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

			== Splitting discussion for ] ==
	== ] ==

			] An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (]), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, ({{no redirect\|1=Human clitoris}}). If you are interested, please visit ]. Thank you. ] (]) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
	Have anything for August 27? That's the first day of classes at Penn State, so putting this on the main page that day would be great, especially since it will be the first day of classes in the 100th year of the program.
			<!-- Message sent by User:Peaceray@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Peaceray/sandbox/target_list&oldid=1145822346 -->

			== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
	As for the lead, I'll do what I can, but it might be easier to just increase the length of the text in the FA box. --]<sup>]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 21:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

	== Size of FAs ==

			]
	Hi Raul. Long time, eh? Anyway, there's a few of us trying to move ] to FA status. A cursory glance at the article reveals a problem; the man was massively notable for approx 60 years, so the article's massive. We've started hoiking material into daughter articles and ruthlessly editing out anything remotely extraneous, but I'm still concerned over the detail of ] as it applies to FAs -what exactly should we be aiming for? Also, the "size" of the article is presumably increased by images, and this is richly illustrated. Is there a size criterion that excludes images? Sorry, that's a bit of a ramble, but any help would be gratefully received. Let's keep the conversation here (unless you're going to point to an existing thread), if you don't mind. --] 09:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
			Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of June 2023.
	:I'd be most grateful for a reply... I do understand you're busy. --] 10:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
	:: I'm not Raul, but if you read ] it does ''not'' include images, tables, or reference lists. It does seem large, even so, yes. Part of the problem is that the sections that have daughter articles don't seem as condensed as they could be, still being many paragraphs in the main article. Could "1930 tour of England" be a daughter article? --] <sup>]</sup> 13:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

			Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
	There's no hard-and-fast rule. Generally, though, size-related objections include only readable text, excluding images, references, citations, 'etc. If memory serves, objections don't usually start until after 60kb or 70kb of readable prose. ] 13:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

	~~:Thanks~~ for ~~response.~~ ~~Yikes.~~ ~~So we've a long way~~ to go. ~~Any~~ ~~recent~~ ~~promotions~~ ~~of very large articles?~~ --] 13:48, 10 ~~August~~ ~~2007~~ (UTC)		Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 02:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

			== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
	==Discussion Moderation request==
			]
	Raul, your input on a discussion in the ] would be greatly appreciated. Though I seem to be disagreeing with a majority, I believe I am in the right IAW ]. I am willing to acquiesce to your opinion, though, if I am in the wrong. Again, any help & guidance would be greatly appreciated. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 16:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
			Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

			Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ].
	==Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sarah Knauss.jpg)==
	<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
	If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> —] <sup>(])</sup> 00:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

	== ~~Indonesia~~ - ~~17 August...~~ ==		== Your EFM flag ==

			Hello Raul654, after processing your sysop removal, I have also removed your edit filter manager flag as you have been inactive in updating this area of the project for over 10 years. Should you need this again, please let me know or place a request at the ]. Thank you for your prior contributions in this area. Best regards, — ] <sup>]</sup> 00:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
	Hi Raul
			== File:BahaiLotusTemple.JPG listed for discussion ==
			] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 06:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
			==Happy Birthday!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = Happy Birthday
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! ]<sup>]</sup> 20:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
			}}
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = First Edit Day
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ]<sup>]</sup> 15:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
			}}
			==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = Happy Adminship
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, Honeydew 30%, Honeydew 70%, AliceBlue);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your . Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
			}}

			== A random "Thank You" for your efforts ==
	Sorry to pester you, but you did suggest a few weeks back I ask you closer to the date to put ] as the articel of the day for - ie, Indonesia's national day and most important holiday.

			Raul654 - our paths have never crossed. But I want to just thank you for 1) having been Misplaced Pages's first FAC coordinator and helping building such a fine system. I was mostly lurking back then but I noticed your hard work and thought it was really cool. Also, thank you especially for 2) for penning Raul's Razor. Having read it all those years ago, it was a complete paradigm shift for me, away from "well, everyone has some bias so expecting NPOV work is unreasonable." It is a litmus test I mentally use constantly, and not just when evaluating Misplaced Pages articles, either.
	Who does the summary? As one of 3 principal contributors to that article, I can put a summary together if you'd like.

			Cheers!
	Cheers. --] 01:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
			] (]) 00:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

			== I have sent you a note about a page you started ==
	== Beagle (TFA Aug 10 2007) ==

			Hello, Raul654. Thank you for your work on ]. ], while examining this page as a part of our ], had the following comments:
	I've changed some of the punctuation in the lead of ]. I think it enhances readability; could you incorporate those changes into the TFA blurb? -- ] 22:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

			{{Bq\|1=I've marked the article as reviewed, even if it is still in need of improvements for some text seems to have been copied and pasted from a specific source. See the article for more details.}}
	== Replaceable fair use Image:John Walker Lindh.jpg ==
	]
	Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

			To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code\|<nowiki>{{Re\|</nowiki>Cocobb8<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code\|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
	# Go to ] and edit it to add {{tlx\|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''.
	# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

			] (💬 ] • ✏️ ]) 14:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
	Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself.

			:Edit: Apparently you created this article 20 years ago, so probably not applicable to you :) ] (💬 ] • ✏️ ]) 14:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
	If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> —] <sup>(])</sup> 01:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 23#Particle wave}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
			==Happy Birthday!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = Happy Birthday
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 18:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
			}}

	== ~~Sup~~ ==		== ITN archives ==
			Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that ] are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives {{p}} I hope you see this message someday. —usernamekiran ] 22:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = First Edit Day
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 18:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
			}}
			== Replaceable non-free use File:Joe Valachi.jpg ==
			]
			Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of ]. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the ]. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have ''no free equivalent''; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Misplaced Pages. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

			# Go to ] and add the text {{Tlx\|Di-replaceable non-free use disputed\|<your reason>}} '''below''' the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <code><your reason></code> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
	Hey mark, what up homeslice? --] 02:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
			# On ], write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

			Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, ], or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
	== ] ==

			If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable non-free use-notice --> ] (]) 10:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
	Hello Raul, it seems ], now blocked, has been making several odd claims and edits regarding this article and its contents, many of these claims countering the official airline website's information, and has recently been attempting to substitute cet official information for his own with little or no sourcing, which violates original research guidelines. After an edit war with ] which got them both blocked (though Sox23 has been unblocked since) regarding the validity of his edits, the user came in as an anon and has apparently made claims to be the airline CEO (possibly B. Ben Baldanza) and has supposedly made legal threats through ], which was the blocking administrator. Regardless of his threats, the claims Diemacher/anon has made concerning the edits and reversions done by Sox23 (as being incorrect and libelous), as well all of his corrections to the article do basically counter almost everything stated on the airline's official website which is our only true source for everything stated in the article, so unless Diemacher/anon is actually the CEO and he suddenly makes some sort of official statement regarding this, or actually updates the website, then I think we shouldn't validate his edits through the original research rules, but I'm contacting you for a bit of outside intervention for this seeing as I have been an active editor to the article. Currently the article still stands as edited by Diemacher until further notice, and there's small discussion regarding what should be done about the edits and steps taken in this entire ordeal. Also, some users are questioning the blocking of Sox23 as having been done in bad faith. Sooo... that's the entire situation. How should this be handled appropriately? Should we revert the article back to pre-Diemacher status, or leave it as edited by the user? and what of the anon's claims and possible future changes outside blocked IPs? -- ] / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 06:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Personal attack and incivility ==
			<blockquote>'''Non-notable product that has been unreferenced since 2006. Found one in-depth review but not enough to satisfy ].'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	I think that this goes over the top and that your administrator status does not grant you the right to rant against me like this. I'll answer to your series of ]s and other ] soon enough. --] 13:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
	:I've reverted your edit to that page that removed my comment. In the future, do not remove comments from other. And it's not rant to collect your asinine comments and point out how they differ from reality - and that every word you write is a lie, including "and" and "the" ] 13:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
	::I see there's no way I will bring you to reason and civility. Failing an apology, I'll bring it to the admins noticeboard (not that I want to or expect much, but I must by principle). --] 13:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::You should be apologizing to all the people on ] and related pages whose time is wasted replying to your constant stream of specious comments. You will get none from me. ] 13:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Speaking of AN, I've started ] 13:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 18:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
	== Topic ban ==
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I think it might be worth trying some informal mediation first. I can imagine being a lone dissenting voice must be frustrating. Give it a chance? --] 14:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
	== Venue ==
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 29#Hallelujah night}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

			==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
	Friend, I've left a response at AN for you. Regards, ] <sup> ] </sup> 14:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			\| name = Happy Adminship
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Raul654! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 05:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
			}}
			P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. ] (]) 05:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:05, 23 December 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Raul654 has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

For your tireless work in making Misplaced Pages better, for keeping Template:Feature up-to-date, for doing the grunt work of cleaning up Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates, for mediating in disputes, for adding lots of really nice pictures, and for still finding the time to work on articles! In a few months you've already become a highly valued member of the community. Stay with us and don't burn out, please. --Eloquence Apr 10, 2004

Did you retire from Misplaced Pages?

Did you retire from Misplaced Pages? Is all well? 4thfile4thrank (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there. All is well. I'm just not very active here these days. (I don't have nearly as much free time as I did before the kids came along). Raul654 (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Raul654, we will welcome you back in 18 years ;) —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Greetings of the season

I Am Half-Sick of Shadows, Said the Lady of Shalott		Happy holidays
		Dear Mark, For you and all your loved ones, "Let there be mercy". Wishing you health, peace and happiness this holiday season and in the coming year. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey Sandy! Great to here for you. I hope all is well. :) Raul654 (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Same to you ... Happy New Year! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 10:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Papal oath (traditionalist Catholic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papal oath (traditionalist Catholic) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Papal oath (traditionalist Catholic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Veverve (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Request to remove full protection

Hello, you had full protected the page Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/November 30, 2005 over 15 years ago. It is no longer necessary to keep it full protected since it not displayed on main page anymore. I request you to downgrade the protection level to Semi protection or unprotection. Thanks. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 03:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU 22:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Foundation and empire cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Foundation and empire cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie

User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 12:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

A somewhat premature New Year's greeting

		Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2022.
		Thank you for your contributions toward making Misplaced Pages a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Moral lesson: John Vanderlyn was an American painter who studied in Paris, and his life-sized Ariadne Asleep on the Island of Naxos was one of the first large nudes exhibited in the United States. Peddling the poison as well as the cure, this overtly sensuous work was presented to the public as a moral lesson on the consequences of lascivious behavior. Visible in the distance is the ship of Princess Ariadne's secret lover, Theseus, for whom she has betrayed her people by helping him to escape the Labyrinth and slay the Minotaur. Ariadne's bliss will come to an end when she awakens from her post-coital reverie, only to discover that the faithless Theseus has sailed away without her.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

FAR for Battle of Dien Bien Phu

I have nominated Battle of Dien Bien Phu for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Raul654 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! interstate five 00:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day, Raul654! --Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nambla

A tag has been placed on Nambla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:

Draft:Nambla pending. The AfC draft is about a place in Jammu & Kashmir, India.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me 01:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hey look! A kitten!

Max~is~a~good~dog! (talk) 20:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy Nineteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Raul654. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Old Dan Tucker under Featured Article Review

I have nominated Old Dan Tucker for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phalaenopsis 'Kaleidoscope'

The article Phalaenopsis 'Kaleidoscope' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consensus has been established via discussion at WP:PLANTS and previous AfDs/PRODs that individual cultivars are not presumed notable in the same way as natural species, and must meet GNG to have a standalone article. Database and commercial catalog entries are not considered sufficient for this purpose. I did not find any reliable in-depth non-commercial non-database independent significant coverage of this cultivar.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Nineteenth Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Raul654 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy adminship anniversary!
Hi Raul654! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU 22:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Raul654!

Happy New Year!

Raul654,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. See this for background context.
— Moops 18:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops 18:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Parr

A tag has been placed on Jack Parr, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a disambiguation page which either: disambiguate only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguate zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title. (See section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of June 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Splitting discussion for Clitoris

An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 02:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your EFM flag

Hello Raul654, after processing your sysop removal, I have also removed your edit filter manager flag as you have been inactive in updating this area of the project for over 10 years. Should you need this again, please let me know or place a request at the Misplaced Pages:Edit filter noticeboard. Thank you for your prior contributions in this area. Best regards, — xaosflux 00:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

File:BahaiLotusTemple.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BahaiLotusTemple.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy birthday!
Hi Raul654! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU 20:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!
Hi Raul654! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU 15:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

A random "Thank You" for your efforts

Raul654 - our paths have never crossed. But I want to just thank you for 1) having been Misplaced Pages's first FAC coordinator and helping building such a fine system. I was mostly lurking back then but I noticed your hard work and thought it was really cool. Also, thank you especially for 2) for penning Raul's Razor. Having read it all those years ago, it was a complete paradigm shift for me, away from "well, everyone has *some* bias so expecting NPOV work is unreasonable." It is a litmus test I mentally use constantly, and not just when evaluating Misplaced Pages articles, either.

Cheers! Trevdna (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Raul654. Thank you for your work on Eva Morris. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've marked the article as reviewed, even if it is still in need of improvements for some text seems to have been copied and pasted from a specific source. See the article for more details.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit: Apparently you created this article 20 years ago, so probably not applicable to you :) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

"Particle wave" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Particle wave has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 23 § Particle wave until a consensus is reached. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy birthday!
Hi Raul654! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

ITN archives

Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that Misplaced Pages:In the news/Posted/Archives are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives I hope you see this message someday. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!
Hi Raul654! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Joe Valachi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Valachi.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Misplaced Pages. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tim Landy (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TeleZapper

The article TeleZapper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable product that has been unreferenced since 2006. Found one in-depth review but not enough to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Nomination of TeleZapper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TeleZapper is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TeleZapper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nthep (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

"Hallelujah night" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hallelujah night has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 29 § Hallelujah night until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: