Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:36, 13 June 2005 view sourceCryptic (talk \| contribs)Administrators41,572 edits →June 13: John corabi ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 20:37, 21 December 2024 view source MER-C (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,691 edits no backlog
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<noinclude>{{short description\|Listing of articles that need investigation for copyright issues}}</noinclude>
	{{Shortcut\|]}}
			{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef\|small=yes}}
	{{deletiontools}}
			<div class="mw-notalk">
	{{dablink\|'''WP:CP''' does '''not''' stand for ].}}
			{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/Header}}
			</div>
			==Listings of possible copyright problems==
			{{Purge button\|right}}
			{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/Older consolidated}}
			===Older than 7 days===
			{{hatnote\|Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 7 days. They will be processed at any time by clerks or administrators (see ]). When every issue on a day is clear, the day may be removed.}}
			<!-- Last date transferred to this list: December 16-->

			===New listings===
	This page is intended for listing and discussing '''copyright problems''' on Misplaced Pages, including pages and images which are suspected to be in violation.
			{{Purge button\|right}}
			{{hatnote\|Some listings may not be displayed on this page due to template transclusion limits. This can be alleviated by clearing the backlog.}}

			'''New listings are made on daily reports transcluded on this page and are not directly added to it.''' To add a new listing, please go to '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. Instructions for adding new listings can be found at ]. Editors may resolve issues with listings at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See ] for more information.
	'''Notice to copyright owners''': If you believe Misplaced Pages is infringing ''your'' copyright, you may choose to raise the issue using ]. Alternatively, you may choose to contact ] under the terms of the ].
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-7 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-7 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-6 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-6 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-5 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-5 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-4 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-4 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-3 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-3 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-2 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-2 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-1 day}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j\|-1 day}}}}}}
			{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j}}\|{{Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j}}}}\|{{preload\|link=Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{#time:Y F j}}\|preload=Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/preload\|color=#BA0000}}}}

			===Footer===
	On the other hand, if you see an article somewhere else which you believe was copied from the Misplaced Pages without attribution, visit the ] page or ].
			Misplaced Pages's current date is '''{{FULLDATE\|type=dmy}}'''. Put new article listings in {{preload\|link=Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/{{CURRENTYEAR}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}\|preload=Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/preload}}. Files should be handled by ''']''' or ''']'''.


	== Instructions ==

	If you list a page or image here which you believe to be a copyright infringement, be sure to follow the instructions in the "]" section below. Page titles should stay listed for a minimum of '''7 days''' before a decision is made. Add new reports under ] section at the bottom of this page.

	Pages where the most recent edit is a copyright violation, but the previous article was not, should not be deleted. They should be ]. The violating text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the ] to remove it.

	<small>'''See also:''' ], ], ], ], ], ]</small>

	=== Copyright infringement notice ===

	==== Actions to take for text ====

	Remove the text of the article, and replace it with the following:

	<nowiki>{{</nowiki>copyvio\|url=''place URL of allegedly copied material here''}}

	<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>

	Where you replace "''place URL of allegedly copied material here''" with the Web address (or book or article reference) that contains the original source text. For example:

	<nowiki>{{</nowiki>copyvio\|url=<nowiki>http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/hovawart.htm</nowiki>}}

	After removing the suspected text violation add an entry on this page under ] section at the bottom of this page.

	Optionally, add ] to the article creator's talk page, to notify them of the problems with posting copyrighted material to wikipedia.

	==== Actions to take for images ====

	If you suspect an image is violating copyright, add the following to the image description page:

	<pre><nowiki>{{imagevio\|url=<place URL of allegedly copied image here>}}~~~~</nowiki>
	</pre>

	After adding the text to the image information page add an entry on this page under ] section at the bottom of this page.

	Finally, do not forget to add a note to the uploader's talk page to notify them that the image's copyright status is murky and it has been listed here.

	=== In addition ===

	In addition to nominating potential copyright violations for deletion, you could:
	* '''Replace''' the article's text with new (re-written) content of your own: This can be done on a '''temp page''', so that the original "copyvio version" may be deleted by a ]. Temp versions should be written at a page like: <nowiki>]</nowiki>. If the original turns out to be not a copyvio, these two can be merged.
	* '''Write to the owner''' of the copyright to check whether they gave permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!).
	* '''Ask for permission''' - see ], ]

	=== Instructions for special cases ===

	* Amazon copyrights: Please list any amazon image copyright issues at ].

	* Pokémon images: The discussion on Pokémon images has been moved to ].

	* ]: These may be listed, if they indeed are not available under a free license or a reasonable fairuse rationalle. Note that some of these may not actually be unfree images, but rather images which are released under multiple licenses.

	* ]: These should replaced and many should be listed for deletion. Those that are currently orphaned can be listed on ].

	* ]: These images are apparently available only to Misplaced Pages, and are not released under the GFDL. According to Jimbo Wales, we cannot use images that are not GFDL and are not usable under a fair use rationale . Images from this category may be listed here, but be sure that the image is not also available under a free license, and that a fair use claim cannot be made.

	:From the mailing list:
	::''As of today, all new images which are non commercial only and with permission only should be deleted on sight. Older images should go through a process of VfD to liminate them in an orderly fashion, taking due account of "fair use". (Jimbo)'' :, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

	== Listings of possible copyright problems ==
	<!-- Please append to end of this page! -->

	=== Older than 7 days ===
	:''Below are articles and images that have been listed here for longer than a week old, but have not yet dealt with for specific reasons.''

	====Poster claims to be the author or to have permission====

	When you originally report a suspected copyright violation, do ''not'' add it here, but at the very bottom of this page (under the heading for today's date). Typically, the issue will be resolved within the usual seven days. This section is intended for cases where a second opinion is needed, or where someone should follow-up by e-mail, and which thus need a little more time.

	====Fair use claims needing a second opinion====

	Apparently the old ] mechanism has fallen out of use. This section lists all cases (typically images) where a fair use claim was made during the initial seven days, and for which a second opinion is needed. Add your comments here, and when you remove an entry from here (and it is kept), copy the discussion to the (image) talk page.

	*]. Claimed as fair use on the grounds that we can't get a non-copyrighted image of the event. I have my doubts on this. --] 06:48, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] in article ]. Doesn't look like fair use to me. --] 00:05, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
	** This image is now being investigated by ]. It appears to be based on the far right photo (click on it) found . This would appear to make it based on a Australian gov. source and therefore public domain, though once edited I don't know what its status would change to. ] <sup>(])</sup>] 05:58, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
	*Australian government works are crown copyright. But as copyright only covers the creative aspects of the image, not the underlying data this can be recreated. See ]
	** Thanks! Just found that out - dumb of me to assume Australia puts its stuff in the PD. Oh well... ] <sup>(])</sup>] 02:29, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)


	*]. The copyright for this photo is being asserted by the New Zealand National Front, who claim to have purchased it from the photographer for the purposes of suppressing the image. ]. Some editors, including me, think that this qualifies under fair use. This version of the photograph has been edited down to a lower resolution, it is directly relevant to the article, and there is no way of recreating it. Any opinions? -] 03:15, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
	:*Seems like a reasonable fairuse rational. But when I run it through the ] decision tree I get a delete result, because the image was never intended for wide distribution. The decision tree there is a recent addition, and something I've never seen before. It's also somewhat subjective. --] 22:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
	*The following was moved here from ifd:
	**Speaking as a legal representative of the New Zealand National Front, I herby advise that the image posted ( ] ] Copyright © 2000-2004 New Zealand National Front. All rights reserved.) are the legal property of the New Zealand National Front, and it's use is restricted by published international copyright treaties and conventions of New Zealand and the United Nations. Legal ownership of the image (in both digital and hardcopy format) was transferred from the original copyright holder, the photographer, to the New Zealand National Front during the month of January, 2005. Use of the image is therefore restricted until ownership of the image is restored to the public domain, or explicit permission is obtained from the New Zealand National Front in writing. - ]
	**Molloy has provided no evidence that he is a legal representative of the New Zealand National Front (he's a teenager, so it's unlikely), and has offered no evidence that the New Zealand National Front is the copyright holder. This is an embarrassing photograph for them because it shows them making Nazi salutes, which is why Molloy, who is a member, would like to see it deleted. The photograph is widely available on the Web, a source has been provided on the image page, and we are claiming fair use under United States copyright law. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 06:49, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
	***Here is a legal notice from the New Zealand National Front - ]
	****This image is being used under the U.S. "Fair Use" and New Zealand "Fair Dealings" exemptions. Further, this is the wrong page to deal with this matter because it is a copyright dispute. It should be handled on the ] page. -] 04:54, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
	:SHould this be deleted, or is it fair user?--] 13:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)


	*] is part of the Bettmann Collection and is copyright Bettmann/CORBIS I'm sceptical about a fair use claim. How think you? ] 03:31, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
	**There's a duplicate of lower quality at ], which is tagged as a US gov work, though I think that's just because it was found on a .gov site. Regarding the fair use claim, I'd like to think we could use a low res version, because ''how else'' can you illustrate such an event? There is no other way to get the visual information other than through that photograph, and our usage would not impact whatever commercial value it has. I'm leaning towards fair use on this. ] 06:10, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
	***Unique and unrecreatable images of newsworthy events such as this are broadly acknowledged to have fair use and fair dealing status for applications such as our own. Shouldn't be a problem. ] 16:40, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	*] from . Claimed as PD, but the LTA's explicitly say otherwise. ] 16:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
	:'''Dispute''': Its a mere system map, which I uploaded out of convenience. There is basically no creative effort in the map whatsoever, especially since its schematic, with no cartological precision. I could basically duplicate it on memory on a piece of paper or using gimp/mspaint/etc. and it would look just as good, except it would be tedious to duplicate all 50+ stations mentioned. Is a non creative work eligible for copyright? I hardly think its intellectual property. -- ] 20:17, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
	::The LTA may well think otherwise! Transport for London charges quite handsomely for the rights to reproduce its system map... ] 20:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
	:::Interesting information from Physchim62. I feel that ] or ] should apply here. The image is created for disseminating information. Fair use still protects the copyright holder, in case wikipedia go commercial in future, (hope not). ] 22:10, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
	::Wrong. A schematic map ''does'' have creative effort put into it, more so than a more accurate map. As such, it is very definitely covered by copyright. --] 23:20, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
	::: If it was a tourist map complete with illustrations, then yes. The LTA map is pretty simplistic, only tedious and repetitive - nothing creative. I could basically reproduce it manually myself, since its just the order of the stations, with my own colour scheme, except it would take say, 15-30 minutes to add every station. It becomes purely a mathematical thing, nothing creative. -- ] 18:47, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
	::I agree with ] that schematic maps have creative effort, but let's not forget that it only needs the ''slightest'' creative effort to trigger copyright. The system map in its present form could not just be created from a mathematical function of the positions of the stations. It's copyright, and if the LTA don't want to let us use it under GNU then there's nothing we can do. ] 17:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
	:::Well, until someone contacts the LTA and clarifies the matter, the image should not be used. If someone wants to reproduce it (tediously) by hand, they're certainly welcome to. ] 02:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====Suspected copyright infringements without online source====

	These need a thorough check for online sources, and if none are found, a check for ''offline'' sources.

	*] has that certain scent to it - it's the in-text citations and the slanted quotation marks around “China” that give it away for me... could be someone's paper for school. --] ] 04:14, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
	*] and ] all smell like copyvios but I can't tell where from. They were all put up by ], and share the same writing style. ] 05:44, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
	** No copyvio notices on these articles. -- ] 14:21, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
	** I agree that these are almost certainly copyright violations, although they might be school papers this guy wrote. I can't find the sources either. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 15:55, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
	*Listed by ] on VfD: The articles ], ], ], and ] were all posted within seven minutes of one another. They show remarkable consistency in format, almost as if they had been taken from a book on horses. A Google search for copyvio does not turn up any hits, which shows only that if these are copyvios, they are not from web resources. - ] 17:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	==== Others ====
	*] - this compilation of opinion is the property of FHM-US. ]] 06:51, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
	**How is this different than any other similar list, many of which are also the basis for a Misplaced Pages article? ] 04:32, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
	** I'm not sure about this one. More opinions needed. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 11:44, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
	** FHM had creative input into the list, both in ordering and selection. See ]. —] (]) 12:29, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*** FHM actually had no input on the ordering or selection. Both are the result of a reader poll. FHM's editorial content would be the selection of the pictures and text which accompanied the poll results and neither is included in the Misplaced Pages article. ] 00:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
	** This is a fascinating dillemma. On the one hand, I can't see why this list couldn't be copyrighted. On the other hand, we list the Oscar winners and runner-ups, and the Nobel Prize winners and nominees, which are essentially the same thing. I can't imagine it would be a problem to say "She was listed as one of FHM's sexiest women of 2005" in each woman's article, so why would it be a problem to list them in one article? I'd tend to vote keep, but if a lawyer wants to chime in, we'd all be obliged. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 18:10, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] - from - intellectual property of Channel 4. ]] 00:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
	**I question that a straight list can be copyrighted ] 03:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
	***See above. —] (]) 18:04, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
	*Seeing as we don't seem to be reaching a consensus here, I've raised this issue at the ]. ] 15:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
	*I agree with ] that the FHM list is copyright as the "creative input" of the author(s) is non-zero. The list would have ] protection in other jurisdictions even if it were not copyright in the US. ] 18:10, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
	*I don't agree that a reader's poll (with just the result list, no pictures, writing, etc.) has "creative input" from the magazine. I don't understand how either of these lists are copyrightable, where is the creative work by FHM or Channel4? They are both just results of readers polls.--] 15:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
	*The magazine chose to use to poll however. ] \| ] 01:14, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
	*I think a list like this '''is not''' copyrightable. I ask you to consider the following analogy: Some organizers had a sort of a contest. The results were made known, along with a a lot of interesting detail concerning the contestants and the contest itself. Later, a second party posted the rankings of the contestants. Did the second party violate the first party's rights in any way?


	<blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;">
	<table border="1">
	<tr><td>'''Example'''</td><td>'''Organizers'''</td><td>'''Contest'''</td><td>'''Method'''</td><td>'''2nd Party'''</td></tr>
	<tr><td>1</td><td>Major League Baseball</td><td>Baseball team standings</td><td>Played a bunch of games</td><td>Newspaper Sports page</td></tr>
	<tr><td>2</td><td>FHM</td><td>Sexiest women rankings</td><td>Asked a bunch of people</td><td>Misplaced Pages</td></tr>
	</table>
	</blockquote>

	:Why is example 2 any different than example 1?

	:However, that the New York Times disagrees with me. They have pursued action against other publications that have re-published their best-seller list. For example, they went after www.amazon.com for using the New York Times bestseller list as a basis for providing purchase incentives (books on the lsit were to be discounted). This was quickly settled with Amazon agreeing to certain terms, including; listing the books alphabetically instead of in-order, and sharing sales information with the New York Times. Since this didn't make it to a legal ruling, it does not set a legal precedent. Maybe someone can find an example that did go to court? ] 02:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	=== New listings ===
	<!-- Please append to end of this page! -->



	====May 18====
	*I have nominated ] and ] for ]; there doesn't seem to be consensus either way. It has been argued that the articles violate copyright (the definitions have been copied from commercial dictionaries and encyclopedias). Other users have disagreed and suggested the lists to be kept, merged, or moved to Wikiquote. Are they acceptable to be kept anywhere on Misplaced Pages? - ] 12:00, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
	**Quoting a definition from a dictionary or is not a copywrite violation. It's ]. I don't know about "copyright" though.. ] 20:26, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
	**] was listed here as a copyright violation of ''thirteen'' paper dictionaries on ] and deleted after the discussion period on ]. This is the same copyrighted material re-posted, and is is a speedy deletion candidate. ] contains exact copies of text from ''twenty-six'' (non-GFDL) copyrighted dictionaries and ''three'' encyclopaedias, and is a copyright violation on a massive scale. (This isn't "quoting a definition from a dictionary" as the author, and those who are for the inclusion of this text not because permission has been granted to use this copyrighted content but simply because they don't want their edit war with the author to start up again, would have us believe.) Like ], there is no non-infringing version to revert to. The article began with these violations. ] 15:53, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
	***And it IS spelled "copyright" (right to copy), not "copywrite". If you can copy definitions of a word from a number of dictionaries, you can certainly look up another word in a single one. - ] 16:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
	***If ] was deleted for that reason, it was wrongly deleted. The number of dictionaries is irrelevant. If it's not a copyright violation to quote one dictionary then it's not a violation to qoute one thousand dictionaries. ] 03:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
	****I doubt that either of these is a copyvio, they are just short quotes from many different sources. More context should be provided to be on the safe side, however, like adding a short comment/description/interpretation to each quote.--] 08:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
	**So, how do we know if this is resolved so we can get the article back up? ] 16:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

	====May 19====
	*] from --] 02:38, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
	** This issue has not been resolved yet - the original contributor says he obtained permission for the ''photo'' to be used (by Misplaced Pages only). Last I heard, he was going to approach ] to ask if the material could be released under the GFDL. This was on May 19. --] 02:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====May 20====
	* ] includes a full length(3:03 min) version as an .ogg file. I strongly doubt that this is PD in any way. (Sorry if this is the wrong place to put this) ] 23:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
	**I will contact uploader to ask them to upload a shorter version.--] 10:51, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====May 27====
	*] from ] 16:05, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
	**Submitter says on the talk page that he has permission, although it's not explicit in terms of "this is licensed under the GPL". --] 03:26, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

	====May 28====
	*] from . ] 20:17, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
	**Submitter claims in a note on the /Temp page to be the original author. Credible? --] 04:11, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	***did you ask for an email confirmation from the address that appears in the cited webpage? They almost always answer in under 24 hours if legitimate.--] 04:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . Text cited the source and there were no copyright notices on said source, but still. --] \| ] 23:17, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
	**Submitter claims on the talk page to have permission. Credible? --] 04:11, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

	====May 29====
	*] from ] 01:36, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
	**Submitter claims on the talk page to be the original author... --] 19:07, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

	====May 30====
	*] from --] 02:36, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] (NOTE that this is a .doc file!). ]] 08:51, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
	*] Unsure about this one, but better safe than sorry. Article copied more-or-less directly from a U.S. gov (NASA Glenn) website which has no clear copyright notice that I can find, but OTOH there is a single author of the original listed. Apparently some .gov sites are public domain, others aren't. Expert opinion needed. ] 20:30, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from and ; a massive expansion of this article on May 20 was a copy-paste job cobbled together from BBC news; I reverted to the version prior to that edit, but was reverted myself and accused of "slaughtering" the article by the perpetrator himself; unfortunately, the article had been changed quite a bit before my revert and again after that; I don't think it should be my job to prove the pedigree of every single paragraph derived from the copyvio, and I don't agree that changing a few words makes a copyvio go away, as some editors seem to believe. There is ''no'' copyvio tag on this article, and I left the article as is, because I don't fancy getting into an edit war over this. ] 20:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

	====May 31====
	*]
	*] from although I'm not sure if that kind of documents can be put under free licenses and redistributed worldwide. ] ] 21:11, 31 May 2005 (UTC)



	====June 2====
	*] admits to being from <nowiki><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>~</nowiki> 19:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ; this and the 3 above all from --] 07:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . -- ] 08:29, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 08:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from <font color=green>] ], ] ]</font> 09:24, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 09:51, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 10:33, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	I'm re-listing these - they were listed on the 16th of May and removed from this page, but not dealt with. Note that ] contains a second copyvio on the ''new'' page from , which I have just removed. --] 10:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*], from
	:*], from
	::Note: this article has been previously deleted, there has been editwaring over inclusions of copyright violations.--] 17:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] from
	::] is revised and ready for reinstatement. ] 15:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From
	*] From
	*] From
	*] From
	*] From .
	*] from
	*] from ] \| ] \| ] 15:45, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
	*], large chunks from ] 16:50, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] — <font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font> \| ] 16:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]from ] ] 16:54, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From ... photo lacks proper image tag and is from an unverifable source suitable for Misplaced Pages. --] 16:57, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
	*] from ] 17:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] original article has text from . ] 17:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 17:32, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 17:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from bio portion of . ] 17:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 17:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 17:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 17:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] original article from . ] 17:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from . ] 18:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 18:17, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 18:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:09, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 20:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 20:17, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 20:33, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] - self-admitted by poster. -- ] 21:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from ] ] 21:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:34, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . Site allows non-commercial use only. --] 21:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* <s>] from </s> ] ] 21:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:Author released material per the GFDL and confirmed via email. Article is now on VFD.--] 02:38, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Portions of ] from portions of ]. ] ] 21:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	** Author has reverted the changes to remove the copyvio notice and added one sentence. Article is still a copyvio from the same place. ] 23:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Two 1930s Edward Weston photos apparently taken from "fair use" site containing copyright attributions, and with non-commercial-use-only terms for their scans . ] 22:16, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] taken from
	:*] taken from
	*] from Even if it wasn't copyvio, I'd probably take it to VfD as this "legend" seems to be nothing more than a marketing ploy. --] 22:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] album sleve artwork is copyright. ] 22:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:: Aren't album covers understood to be fair use? ] 02:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) (])
	*] from --] 03:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 3====
	*] from several places. It isn't a complete copy but sopme sections are direct copies from places like or and . Content minus copyvio should be moved to temp and the article deleted to remove the vio from the history. ] ] 06:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (if this isn't a copyvio please consider VfD - as Misplaced Pages is not a 'how to' --] ] 09:46, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] has identical sentences as and is completely unwikied. --] 10:36, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , as well as ]. —] 11:14, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)]
	*] in article ]. The source cited is online, but the picture looks to me like the one in the "Life Science Library" series book ''Matter''. Either way, it is not clear to me that the fair use claim is justified. -- ] 12:48, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] = -- ] 13:08, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (Also on VfD) ] ] 16:21, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 16:22, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and ] from ] ] (]) 16:52, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] and . A lot of it is copyvio. ] 17:05, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] (]) 17:07, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and ] from ]\|] 17:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) two images
	*] from ] ] ] (]) 17:14, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 17:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 18:05, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from --] 18:35, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 18:47, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 19:08, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 19:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:37, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]. ] 19:45, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Various articles on individual Crozet Islands:
	**]
	**]
	**]
	**]
	**]
	***All copied from --] 20:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from -] 21:19, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from or . -] 21:25, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . -] 21:27, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 21:52, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 22:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From Anon keeps putting the copyvio material back in -] 22:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 23:34, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

	====June 4====

	*] again word-for-word from -- ] 17:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (didn't remove text from page due to Vfd) - ]] 01:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]. No results on Google but it is obvious that the text is copied from somewhere. ] 02:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from -- ] \| ] \| 02:47, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	** And ]. ] ] 08:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] corporate vanity puff from . -- ] 05:49, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
	*], attributed to AP by which Google suggests is keen to plaster this hagiographic guff in as many places as possible -- but which is not described as GFDL or public domain. -- ] 05:54, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] (]) 06:16, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 06:37, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 07:08, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* Is ] a copyvio from ? ] 09:30, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	** Given that the article was created fully formed in a single edit, I think we have to assume it was copied from the external site, and not vice versa. ] ] 23:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*** The article was created in 2005, whereas the site/page was created in September 2003, which leads me to conclude that the article was copied from the site. But does the author (Moorlock) hold the copyrights to the site the article was copied from or does he/she have explicit permission to copy from the site? ] 11:19, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*** I run sniggle.net, and am the author of the 2003 page that I myself altered for inclusion on wikipedia. I am the copyright holder and approve of the relicensing of the wikipedia version forked from my original article. The same is true for the ] article, BTW -] 16:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**** Although we ], I hope you can understand that Misplaced Pages can't run any chances with possible copyright violations. Such violations, and the possible consequences, can't be taken lightly. So we need to have more to go by than your word. So is there any way in which you can prove that you are indeed the holder to the copyrights of sniggle.net? If so, the copyvio-tag will ofcourse immediately be removed. ] 20:02, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**** "Can't run any chances?" Please. This sort of google sleuthing is hardly foolproof. You got a false positive here, but I'd imagine false negatives are even more common. What if I'd copied the material from a book or some other source that isn't on-line? In any case, I can't ''prove'' any such thing, but if you send email to the mailto: link on sniggle.net, I'll be the one who replies, so at least you'll know that the same person who runs that site also posted here.-] 16:46, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	***** That is exactly the kind of proof the ] is about. The mail is on its way, so if you would be so kind as to respond to the mail, the copyvio tag can be removed and this issue can be settled. To prevent future cases about this site, I will then add a comment to the talk page verifying that you are the holder of the copyrights and that this article is not an infringement of copyrights. ] 22:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	***** And there we have the proper confirmation of permission. I hereby declare this case settled and closed. Moorlock does indeed hold the copyrights to the site the article was taken from. This article is therefore '''not''' a copyvio. ] 10:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . Original editor says they have permission (), but I would like to see some ] to be sure. The site that this is taken from doesn't appear to have any overt copyright notices. --] (]) 14:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from --] 14:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 14:27, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . According to , this picture was created in October 1995. ] 14:35, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -]\|] 14:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] (]) 15:10, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 15:50, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 16:20, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	* ] possibly from , but I can't be 100% certain as I do not speak French. --] 18:04, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . Very little content so just VfD IMHO. ] 21:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] not really linked to from anywhere so probably can just delete ] 21:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 21:28, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]. Please note that Tony Sidaway not only violated procedure by rewrting the article over the copyvio boilerplate and therefore leaving the copyvio in the article history, he deleted this listing without discussion. ]] 21:51, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	** It was a putative copyvio and I rewrote it. I'll selectively delete the disputed history. --]\|] 21:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*** I want to apologise to Rick for a statement (since removed) that could be construed as a personal attack. That was unworthy and unnecessary. --]\|] 22:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 22:04, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] ] 22:40, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 22:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 23:24, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 23:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:Site is a Misplaced Pages mirror. Even says so. --] 23:26, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] '''/''' ] 23:51, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 5====
	*] The article on Interior Design is largely composed of copyrighted material. It was copied from this site: (copyright 1999) and this site (copyright 2005) Further the article should be on "Interior Design" not one "Canna Patel"
	**I rolled back the Canna Patel stuff to the previous version; <s>still looking into the NCIDQ material.</s> I then had to go all the way back to an August 2004 stub to clear the other copyvio. A large amount of material was merged from ] along the way, which may be salvageable. --]] 20:42, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . All the additional links connected are copied as well.
	**No copyvio. External link is a wikipedia mirror. ] 16:46, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . -]
	*] from --] 01:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 01:23, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from alt.skincare ] (]) 01:27, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ]
	* ] from ] 02:41, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 04:17, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	**1913 Webster, not a copyvio. Tagged as a dicdef though. ] ] 17:04, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from the top of . ] 04:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*'''Uploads by ]''' newcomer and may be unfamiliar with Copyright issues on Misplaced Pages. Could someone remove her uploads? ]{{unicode\|↔}}]{{unicode\|↔}}] 04:29, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*:] has systematically been pillaging the picture portal http://www.enmas.com for images, which have been added to many blank articles (i.e. with image but no text). Most of the images listed below are stamped with the enmas logo. None have any copyright attribution. A few of the following images don't have a logo on them, but given Jessebreceda's approach to copyright I suggest that they should be deleted as probable copyvios. Unfortunately Jessebreceda has not heeded an earlier warning about copyright so has been blocked for 24 hours to give him/her an incentive to read the Misplaced Pages policy on this issue.
	::], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] -- ] 17:15, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ISBN 9843220748, as the article helpfully told us, along with the full publisher details, and prices in pounds, dollars, and euros. ] 04:32, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
	*] appears to be copied from a newsarticle at available at:
	*] from --] 06:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] — ] 06:35, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] pieced together from and . ] 06:56, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 06:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 07:00, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
	*] from ] \| ] 08:50, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . —] 09:03, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 09:13, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
	*] and ], both from by ]. Possibly also ] from . ] 10:18, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC) I have also removed a large section from ] that comes from the , this was contributed by ]. ] 18:32, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC) For more information, see ]. ] 15:41, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*], text directly from . ]...<font color=green><small>''] 10:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] (]) 12:04, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 12:19, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] User:Farhansher from 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], text copied from . ] 13:21, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 14:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] (]) 15:25, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 15:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**That's a US government site so it's presumably public domain. ] ] 17:01, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] ] 16:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] ] (])] 16:13, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 18:38, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] ] 18:59, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , same text as ] above -- ] ] 18:59, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 19:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . No indication that it is public domain material, despite assertion by original poster. -- ] 19:32, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
	:civilwar.com, like lots of other places, probably copied it from the which I presume is public domain, being US government. ] 22:53, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 19:45, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , once again. - ] 20:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Listings from ] ] 20:25, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:**<strike>Misplaced Pages mirror, not a copyvio. ] ] 19:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)</strike> It's still a copyvio, but from . ] ] 19:21, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:**1911 Britannica, not a copyvio. ] ] 16:52, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	*] from --] ] 22:33, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**Public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia, not a copyvio. ] ] 16:57, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from both and ] 23:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] lyrics of a song in Swedish by ] and an English translation. Both the original lyrics and the translation would have copyrights, which may be separate. ] 23:11, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from Oregon State Univ.'s website ] 23:24, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]<sup>] ]</sup> 23:37, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from company's site ] 23:46, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 23:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 6====
	*] from that has extracts from a book about the history of ]
	*] from the --] 06:19, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from company's website ] 00:19, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*From ]--] 01:36, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*]
	:*]
	:*]
	:*]
	:*]
	:*]
	*] from —] ] 02:08, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] — ] \| ] 02:19, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From --] 02:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From and other parts of eddietrunk.com, as admitted by the user. ] 02:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] From
	*] From
	*] from . This has been on Misplaced Pages for over two years, but according to archive.org, that site's text predates the Misplaced Pages article by over a year. That, combined with the fact that the first cut at this article on Misplaced Pages was an unwikified blob of text from an anonymous user, suggests that someone copy/pasted it here. --] 03:01, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]. ] 03:41, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and by its own admission from "The concise Biotech Dictionary" ] 03:49, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from
	*].
	*] from . Page was created by ], but there's no way to know if this person actually has the authority to post the information. --] 06:06, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**Acmar then removed it, it was then replaced. Acmar then removed it again, I replaced it again. Note that this page is just a corporate puff; if it's established that there are no copyright problems, it deserves to be rewritten (or deleted). The page is further debased by an animated GIF, which I've left. -- ] 06:52, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*] from . ] claims fair use, but it doesn't conform to ] guidelines. -- ] 06:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from — ] ] 07:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**Includes ] again from . Incidentally, if these Acmar-related pages are eventually deleted, various other graphics that appear within them should probably be deleted too. I'm not listing them as their use seems to be fair (they're corporate logos and the like) -- but without pages on which they appear, they'll of course be pointlessly using up disk space. -- ] 07:41, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*] from . Another in a series of articles advertising Acmar International Group by ]: if not copyvio, then corporate vanity. -- ] 07:05, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	**], used in the same article, from the same source. -- ] 07:32, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*And ] from . User may be copyright holder; if not copyright violation then needs cleanup at least (advertising). — ] ] 07:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from <s>, which incidentally says "All Rights Reserved". Note also that a number of pages redirect here; for at least one of these, there has at one time been a copyvio notice, to which somebody responded that he/she was the copyright holder and granted WP permission to reproduce; but (a) no evidence was presented to show that this person was indeed the copyright holder, and (b) it seems to me that there's a flat contradiction between GFDL and the "reservation" of "all rights". -- ] 07:22, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC) .....</s>PS sorry to have been a bit vague there; please see ]. -- ] 07:59, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	**] has now responded on his talk page; I think that all is OK now. -- ] 05:38, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
	*] from ; I've left the photo for now, as I think this photo (from ) may be used fairly in any article about this chap that's judged to be legitimate. -- ] 07:29, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*Listings from ] ] 09:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*<s>]</s> & mdash; Speedied -] \| ] 06:14, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*]
	:*<s>]</s> resolved, see talk--] 15:43, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From

	* ] & (poss.) ] —→
	::Update: Received comment] from author of said page, will work on a rewrite.
	:'''…]…''' <sup>(])</sup> 10:22, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . --](]) 11:21, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
	*] contains bio from . ] 11:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] ] 12:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from — ] \| ] 14:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] text was added in one edit by an anonymous author and seems to be from — ]
	*] from . Article is lifted almost verbatim from paragraphs 3-6 of referenced URL. -- ] 14:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], ], and ] from -- ] 15:02, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , contained a link to that site. - ] 15:14, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 15:24, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from & --] 15:34, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 15:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (side note: last name is also misspelled in article name) --] 15:49, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 15:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 15:59, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 16:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - Google can't find a source, but it was added in one shot by an anon, references nonexistent figures, and shows evidences of Microsoft Word origin (fancy quotes, bullet characters). ] ] 16:48, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 18:40, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] Lyrics --] 18:51, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from http://www.sfusd.edu/schwww/sch697/library/Facilities-1.htm ] 19:30, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from & --] 19:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from http://www.atlantaciviccenter.com/facility.htm. ] appears to be a new user unfamiliar with copyright. Please check this user's other submissions. ] 19:43, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 19:46, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 19:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 20:03, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*<s>] from </s> property of Serbian Gov, PD ] 22:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 21:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 21:05, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, via ] ] 21:10, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 21:35, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 21:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ~~
	**Not a copyvio, that page credits Misplaced Pages as the source. ] ] 15:48, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] // ] 21:47, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 21:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , extremely blatant copyvio. Last usable non-copyvio edit is from November 2003 . Ouch. --] ] 21:53, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:57, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:17, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	This submission was added BY the Copyright owner of the biography. Suspected page violation updated with a copyright permission notice.
	*] from ] ] 22:24, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from copyrighted song lyrics - ] ] 22:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 23:34, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 7====
	*] and ] copyrights on the images. --] 00:53, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 01:31, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**This is not a copyright violation - it was posted by the original author - rather the was done without the author's permission. Can somebody please advise Xcali to be more thorough before deleting a page? ] 20:38, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	***You will have to explain who you are and how you own the copyright, and that you release it to ] before we just take the word of an anonymous poster. ]] 20:23, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
	****Oops! Forgot to sign my comments. I frequently post to other sites with the pen name ''elderbear.'' I originally wrote the material - it is mine - I am not anonymous ;) Now how do I get the '''/Temp''' version of the page to replace the incorrectly cvioed page and put this all behind me? ] 20:38, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	***The text has been rewritten at ] by JohnElder. I have moved that text to the article proper. ] 03:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] first paragraph is from . ] 01:36, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 01:45, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 01:48, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from and . ]] 02:33, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 02:57, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**The poster seems to own the copyright, and has now posted a GFDL notice on the source page. ] ] 10:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 03:07, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 03:16, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 04:27, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ''(if this is incorrect, please tell me. AMG's TOS say no copying in one place and 'non-commercial use only' in another.)''
	*] from . ] 05:04, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 05:14, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 05:19, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 05:29, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] \| ] 06:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:07, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:16, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . The "Build date: 23 June 2003" indicates that their text precedes all versions of the Misplaced Pages article (I had thought perhaps that their article was instead culled from Misplaced Pages). Archive.org backs this up ; although their date is later than the build date, it's still older than the Misplaced Pages article (problem at archive.org prevents me from actually comparing versions). -- ] ] 20:02, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --]
	*] from . ]] 20:23, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . Copyright claimed by Indianda University. ] 21:02, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:15, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 21:40, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and probably ultimately from some biology textbook by the looks of it. ] ] 21:59, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] ] 22:15, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 22:19, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Biography section in ], from . --] 22:36, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:56, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]from and --] 23:22, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from several sources, not sure if this is the original, but check . ]] 23:45, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
	*And ]. The page at doesn't seem to be compatible with ]. ]] 23:52, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)

	==== June 8 ====

	*Okay, this is a bit complicated... ] is used on a number of images that were supposed to be public domain in Germany. However, it turns out that the template is misworded and does not actually represent German copyright law. As such, it is used wrongly on a number of images. Maybe one of the CP frequenters could check out its what-links-here and see what to do with them. ]]] 12:09, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 00:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 00:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 00:57, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 01:00, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 01:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from ]] 02:04, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 03:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] taken from parts of . ] 03:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 04:54, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Listings from ] ] 05:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*]

	*] from . --] 05:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 05:27, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
	*]. ] 05:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (verbatim) --] 07:18, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 07:49, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
	*] from . ] \| ] 09:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] — <font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font> \| ] 10:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] ancient copyvio, it is explined in the text of the page. --] 12:19, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] is copy-pasted from http://www.mattbarton.net/Documents/Cathedral.doc. -- ] 12:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 12:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , ultimately from: Catalogue "Radical Painting", Williams College Museum of Art/Williamstown, Massachusetts 1984. ] 13:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 14:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 14:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 14:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 14:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 15:33, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 16:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 16:31, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ; it has been slightly rearranged in what looks like a good-faith but misinformed effort to "paraphrase" --] 16:34, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 16:49, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 16:49, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 16:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] 16:54, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 16:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 16:56, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**For all of the above six articles except for Cuthbert of Canterbury, the sources credit a 1908 book, which would be public domain. The website mentions being "edited" so it may be different from the original, but the Wiki articles have somewhat different wording (look at the death dates) so they may be from a different source than the website. ] ] 19:00, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 17:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . — ] \| ] 17:02, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 17:07, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 18:03, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from Does not look like this image is used anywhere. ] 18:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 19:19, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] I uploaded this file, taking it from http://www.sagnanet.is which is associated with the Icelandic Arnamagnæan Institute (http://www.am.hi.is). I thought we could use it at the time and I still hope we can but I need someone to help me sort out the legal issues.

	This is clearly a 2D reproduction of 18th century art and thus, according to US law, not copyrightable. My question is: Is that enough? I don't think there's any such clause in Icelandic law and I've found out that the Arnamagnæan Institute actually seems to claim copyright for the reproductions. Their website states:

	"Hægt er að panta myndir og filmur vegna rannsókna og til birtingar
	í ritum, gegn greiðslu. Þær eru afgreiddar stafrænt á geisladiskum.
	Stofnunin selur birtingarrétt á þeim myndum sem hér eru teknar og
	farið er fram á að þess sé ævinlega getið hvaðan myndirnar eru komnar."

	My translation of this:

	"For a fee it is possible to order pictures and films for research
	and publication. Those are delivered digitally on compact disks.
	The Institution sells the right to publish pictures made here
	and it is demanded that the source of the pictures is always mentioned."

	Doesn't exactly sound like Public Domain, does it? My inquiries to them
	have gone unanswered. Now, there are actually a number of images on
	Misplaced Pages taken from the AM Institute. Do these have to be removed or
	can we ignore (what I assume is) Icelandic law in favor of US law?

	I apologize if this is the wrong place for this inquiry and if it is
	I hope someone moves it. ] 19:28, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	* ] from . Spam, too. ] \| ] 19:34, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 19:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	*] from --] 19:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:I have prepared a replacement page at ] if an admin would kindly delete and move. --] 17:29, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	*] from (Yahoo! Finance profile) ] 20:06, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 20:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 20:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 20:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ("who we are" section) ] 20:26, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

	*] from ] 20:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and elsewhere on the site. ] 20:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	*] from . — ] \| ] 20:56, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
	*] mixed all around from , admitted by user. ] 21:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	Some of the content of the wikipedia article and the content on the page www.coachpaterno.com page are taken from the press release provided by the Virginia Tech Athletic Department (see source link). No copyright violation there. ]

	*] from . ] 21:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from —] 21:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:04, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)I hold the copyright on this page and grant wikipedia any and all rights to reproduction in any form. Paul Payack. New: I hold the copyright to this material and grant Misplaced Pages all rights necessary for publication in any and all formats. I have changed the copyright notice on the referenced page to reflect this. Paul Payack.
	*] from . ] 22:07, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , about a third of the way down the page under the header "CHANGES IN LAND OWNERSHIP IN 1918." ] 22:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*<s>] from --] ] 22:40, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) but please <s\> see the comments at ] --] ] 00:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 22:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - not to mention bizarrely titled. ] ] 23:30, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 23:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] ] 23:49, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	==== June 9 ====
	* ] from . -- ] 00:19, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 00:38, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] <small>(]/])</small> 01:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - the whole article (or a great deal of it) seems to be copied from . ] ] 02:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - partially/mainly from online non-free source (possibly others) . Heavily cribbed sections etc. ] ] 02:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - some paragraphs verbatim, not all. I have rewritten a clean(er) version at ] which I hope can be used instead. ]
	*] from . A cut-and paste operation.
	*] and in the history of redirect ] cut and pasted from --] 04:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 04:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 05:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 05:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from TV Guide. --] 05:22, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ]\|] 05:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] \| ] 06:05, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 06:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 06:38, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 06:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 09:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 09:37, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 10:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Someone took and created a new WP article for each section of the source by copying the respective text. At least two have been caught and deleted as copyvios, but they were ''recreated'' today (Putra Mosque, Perdana Putra). Others are on this page for the first time. Complete list: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. ] 12:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] a good amount of the history part of the article is taken verbatim from . ] 13:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] there are quite the number of parts in his article that read like it's word-for-word or very close to it from his CNN bio . I'm not tagging the actual page, but someone should determine what should be done. ] 13:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] Copy/paste and some translation from --] 13:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 13:49, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 14:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] ] 15:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from
	*] from . This was copyvio a few months ago from a different source, and someone apparently started it again. It seems as if it may have also tried to be a spam thing- the creator added links to his DeviantART page, and put a copyright notice next to the links to his pictures. In any event, hardly encyclopedic, even if it weren't copyvio. <font color="red">]</font><font color="green">]</font> 16:59, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
	*] ] 19:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] ] 19:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 17:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . Article based on copyvio from inception. --] 18:07, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 18:18, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 19:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 19:37, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ] 20:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - most of the article is copied from . ] ] 20:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]. ] 20:55, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**The violator removed the notice and I replaced it. — ] \| ] 21:11, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
	*] from . Looks like a big cut-and-paste job. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 20:56, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]<sup>] ]</sup> 21:56, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 22:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 23:00, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 23:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 23:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*Is the material at ] copyvio or fair use? It's the standard publisher's summary that's plastered all over the online book stores, but I'm not sure that translates as permission for us to post it.] 23:59, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 10====
	*] from ]--] 22:06, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] at . ] 01:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] and ] for ] at . ] 03:24, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] Google for "Osiris Legend" reveals many copies, most point to ©1997 Deurer. I'm not sure where the original is. This article wasn't so much of a rewrite as it was a dropping/changing of a few words here and there, so I'm placing it on copyvio. --] 04:22, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] is entirely copied from --] 05:06, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
	*], from -- ] ] 09:45, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - Apparently copied from the game manual, or from one of the Internet sites where this material appears. (See , .) - ] 12:28, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - most of article from http://www.law2.byu.edu/Law_Society/pdf_Clark_Memorandum/cmF04.pdf (see right side of page 4 and left side of page 5 - order and many phrases taken straight from here) {{User:Trödel/sig}} 12:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from - ]] 13:23, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] \| ] 14:05, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied (with acknowledgement) from book by Langston Hughes'. (Also entirely POV.) ] 14:13, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:01, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] copied from . May have been placed with company permission, but article ] is on VfD currently anyway. --] 15:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 16:13, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 16:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from I've reverted it to the last non-copyvio version. --] 16:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from by 200.49.218.115 --] 17:52, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from by 207.35.188.13 --] 18:01, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] - from -- ] \| ] 18:06, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
	*{{user\| Rysiekzklanu}} has up-loaded three images, which he placed in ], in each case adding an acknowledgement of a different photographer's copyright. He has refused to reply to my enquiry (indeed, he has replaced the images, as well as the "copyedit" template, and an anon who is pursuing a rather silly vendetta against me has also replaced them). The images are:
	**]
	**]
	**]
	--] (] 18:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and . ] 18:37, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 18:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 18:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] as listed on page from and . ] 18:58, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and -- ] \| ] 19:04, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , ] from , ] from — requested on ]. --] 19:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ("SPR Principle" section) ]]<span class="plainlinks"></span>] 19:43, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
	* ], ], ], ], ], ], ] all from . ] 19:45, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . ] 19:45, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from ]\|] 20:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:26, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] <small>(]/])</small> 23:12, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] <small>(]/])</small> 00:24, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] is from . Note that the freebeagles copyright licence is incompatible with Misplaced Pages's . ] 00:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	====June 11====
	*] from -] 01:13, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 01:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] lyrics from South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut ]] 02:15, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
	*] from ]] 02:34, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
	*] from ]→] 02:46, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
	*] and ] from --] 02:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from ]] 02:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from multiple pages under --] 03:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 03:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 04:48, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 05:46, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 05:51, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from / ] 05:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 06:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:01, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**Look more closely: "This article was derived fully or in part from the article Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test on Misplaced Pages - the 💕." ] ] 19:38, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] 08:06, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
	*] from -- ] 08:55, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 10:00, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (many images from the uploader, ], appear to be wholesale copyvios tagged as Public Domain --] \| ] 10:03, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from --] \| ] 10:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from . ] 10:46, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 11:08, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 11:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] — was used in ], where it was labelled "copyright- Ks. S. Pietrzak". ] (] 11:41, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 11:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC). The same website credits ] to Boeing, so we probably can't use it, either.
	* ] from --] 14:25, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from --] 14:31, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 17:06, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 17:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 18:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] (] 18:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from , ''''Copyright 2005 Project Rain Forest''''. ] 18:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 19:06, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from at minimum , but may be more. --] 19:09, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ''''Copyright (c) The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International, Inc.'''' ] 19:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] not from anymore, they removed it due to copyright problems. ] 19:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 19:22, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ''''© 2004 Association of Camphill Communities All rights reserved.'''' ] 19:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . Permission was given for noncommercial use only. --](]) 19:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] --] (]) 19:47, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 19:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 20:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (source page is Albanian, but the article seems to be direct translation) --] 20:36, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	:Same applies to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].--] 20:55, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 20:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] (partial copypaste) from . --] 21:28, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and the following pages ] 22:48, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] Copyright ] not a copyright violation, edited for space.1989, 2005 19:00 June 11 2005
	*Listings from ] ] 23:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	*]

	====June 12====
	*] from ] 21:03, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 00:52, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . —]→] 02:07, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	*] from
	*] from . On VfD. - ] 03:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from also a wiktionary entry. ] 03:20, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 03:43, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (and it's in Portuguese) --] (]) 05:43, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 07:08, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] found from . ]{{unicode\|↔}}]{{unicode\|↔}}] 07:39, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] -- which is freshly up for VfD -- incompletely thirdpersonized from . -- ] 07:47, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	*] from the text was trimmed by another wikipedian but this is also from the guy who made ]. ]{{unicode\|↔}}]{{unicode\|↔}}] 07:58, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 07:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 08:14, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 08:32, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] ] 08:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from by 219.93.174.101 --] 10:54, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from by 219.93.174.101 --] 11:14, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from by 219.93.174.101 --] 11:31, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 12:21, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ]2005-06-12t14:57z
	*] from --] 15:06, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 15:24, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	*] from --] 16:04, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	** I am the author of the original article 18:24, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	** Moved to VfD. The author (of both the original and wikipedia articles) seems to have put it in the public domain. See ]. --] 17:45, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*** Speedy delete per request from article creator. --] 19:20, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 16:18, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 16:49, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 17:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --](]) 17:40, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
	**Ditto ] and ]. ] ] \| ] 17:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 18:18, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 18:20, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 18:20, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from and the other two parts on linked site. ] 18:24, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] (geography section) from --] 19:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ] 20:23, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 20:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . --] 20:32, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 21:13, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] — ] 21:33, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 22:40, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)-
	*]. ] 22:45, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from

	====June 13====
	* ] from --] 00:24, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] Images of porn stars are copyrighted. --] 00:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	**The problem isn't ], the problem is ]. If the copyright violation is in the image, then just delink it from the article and add ] to the image description page, then list the image here. I wonder if a fair use argument could be made for this one, but not knowing the source, I can't say what use it is making of the original. ] 03:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ], ], ], ] More images of porn stars. All of these images are probably copyrighted since all porn stars and their studios copyright their products. --] 00:38, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] and ] ditto above. All of these are from the same author. --] 00:38, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from ] 01:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from
	* ] from
	:About these two images concerning Scatman John (which I put on the copyright problems page): It says on the , "(C) 2001- all respective owners. Unauthorised copying and/or use of material on this site is prohibited." HOWEVER, the website has been down for about 4 years (its last archive was on 22 Sep 2001), and after it went offline it turned into a gay porn site for a number of years after that (currently, it is nothing) and I was wondering because it has been down for 4 years would it be ok to copy the material? ---]
	::Copyrights take 75 years to expire. ] 03:03, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	::Furthermore, lack of use by the copyright holder doesn't mean the copyright protection lapses. ] 03:18, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:::Ok, then the article should be deleted. But what about the image? ---]
	* ] from . ] 02:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] from . ] 03:16, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*]—very similar to ] 03:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	]
	*] from .] 04:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . -- ] ] 04:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]{{unicode\|↔}}]{{unicode\|↔}}] 05:12, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

	*Listings from ] ] 05:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*] From
	:*]
	:*] From
	:*] From
	*], song lyrics from - ]] 05:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], a lot of spelling mistakes and other oddness, but still basically lifted from - ]] 05:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], ] and ] from --] 06:18, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from --] 06:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from - ]] 07:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from - ]] 07:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from - ]] 07:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from - ]] 07:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*], from and - ]] 07:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from . ]] 07:24, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
	*]. The uploader even wrote that the image is copyrighted Corbis. Corbis (Bill Gates) jealously guards their copyrights. ]] 07:31, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

	*<s>] from (undetected for nearly half year already) ] 07:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)</s>
	**That is a Misplaced Pages mirror. (Look at the <small>really tiny and almost unreadable</small> text at the bottom of the page.) ] 09:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 08:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from (as helpfully noted at the bottom) ] 08:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from .]\|] 09:06, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	* ] helpfully stated: "This recipe is taken straight from a book called Top Secret Restaurant Recipes: Creating Kitchen Clones from America's Favorite Restaurant Chains written by Todd Wilbur."
	*] from and if it weren't plagiarism it still wouldn't be encyclopedic. -- ] 09:38, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
	*] from . -- ] 09:46, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
	*] from --] 09:52, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] and ] from ] 09:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*] from ] 10:36, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	==Footer==

	Misplaced Pages's current date is '''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}'''. Before appending new notices, please make sure that you are adding them under the right date header. If the header for today's date has not yet been created, please add it yourself.

	<!-- Do not add anything below this line except categories and interwiki links. -->
	]		]
			]

			]
	]
			]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]

Latest revision as of 20:37, 21 December 2024

Listing of articles that need investigation for copyright issues

"WP:CP" redirects here. For other uses, see WP:CP (disambiguation). ↓ Skip to listings ↓

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles and content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Misplaced Pages copyright
Policy
Copyright policy Copyright violation policy Reusing Misplaced Pages content License text ( CC BY-SA 4.0 GFDL)
Guidelines
Non-free content Copying within Misplaced Pages Public domain content Non-US copyrights
Advice
Frequently asked questions Donating copyrighted material Copying text from other sources Requesting copyright permission Close paraphrasing Guidance for text copyright problems
Processes
Copyright problems Files for discussion Contributor copyright investigations
Resources
General help Copyright assistance Media copyright questions File copyright tags Declaration of consent
v t e

Shortcuts

This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Misplaced Pages. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback, rewrite infringing content, or request copyright permission.

Listed pages appear in the bottom section of the page. For additional guidance, see below.

To add a new listing, go to today's section.

Copyright owners: If you believe Misplaced Pages is infringing your copyright, you may request immediate removal by following these instructions.

How to list an article

Copyright problems handles articles where the copyright status is disputed or complex cases of infringement. You should list an article if one of the following applies:

All revisions of an article have copyright violations (copyvio), and speedy deletion does not apply.
The removal of copyrighted content has been contested.
Removal or reversion is complicated or involves a majority of the article.
You cannot determine whether the text originated from the source or Misplaced Pages. Do not blank the article in this case.
The article is eligible for presumptive deletion.
Other complex situations not listed here or in the section below.

If the article needs to be listed,

Place one of the following above the infringing text:
- {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}
- {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}
- Place {{subst:Copyvio/bottom}} below the last infringing text.
Go to today's section and add {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from ~~~~

to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. A pre-filled version can be copied from the top of the copyvio template after substituting it. If yours is the first listing of the day, please add a header to the top of the page, using the page for another date as an example.

Warn the contributor of the listing at their talk page, unless advised not to. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

What not to list here

Blatant infringement. Articles that are entirely copyvio can be handled through speedy deletion if it meets the criteria. You should not blank or list the article here if you tag for G12.
Non-extensive obvious copyvio. If the copied content is not extensive, you can remove, rewrite, or revert the page to before the text was added. You should place {{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}} on the article afterwards and warn the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.
Requests for revision deletion. These should be handled by placing {{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}} on the article.
Files. For files that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise list at Files for Discussion. If the file is on the Commons, they can be handled through Commons speedy deletion or Deletion requests.
Individual editors. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or files after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512. If one contributor verifiably inserts multiple copyright violations and systematic review is needed, please file a request at Misplaced Pages:Contributor copyright investigations.
Copyright violations without a source. If you cannot find a source of where something could be copied from, do not list the article here. The content may be removed for other reasons, like being unreferenced or violating our biographies of living persons policy.

What text can be reused?

Further information: Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste

Under the United States law that governs Misplaced Pages, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist. One of the following must be present to reuse the content on Misplaced Pages:

Explicit statement by the author, stating that the work is either in the public domain or compatibly licensed.
Public domain due to age, source, or lack of originality.
Fair Use, under our guidelines for non-free content, where the text used is brief and clearly marked with full attribution.

If one of the following is not present, the text cannot be reused. Even if the text can be reused, it must be attributed or it will be considered as Plagiarism.

Responding to listed articles

Copyright owners and people editing on their behalf or with their permission, please see below.

Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright clerks, and VRT agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and resolve listings. Copyright problems is run by volunteers and it usually takes a few days before listings are first investigated.

You can assist in the following ways:

Providing information on the copyright status of the article
Obtaining or verifying claims of permission
Rewriting or removing infringing content (without removing {{copyvio}}.

Providing information on copyright statuses

Not every article listed here has copyright infringement. The content may be on Misplaced Pages first, public domain, compatibly licensed, or below the threshold of originality. Editors can provide information about licensing or public domain status under listings here or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation is very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the article. It may take a few days before a response is provided.

If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing here.

Obtaining/verifying permission

Sometimes material was placed on Misplaced Pages with the permission of the copyright owner. The owner may be willing to give permission and proper license. Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Misplaced Pages:Example requests for permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing.

More details about the permissions process can be seen below and at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials.

Rewriting or removing content

If an article verifiably has copyvio, it is best to remove the content. However, any contributor may rewrite removed text. If the article is blanked, the rewrite takes place at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. The listing will link to the specific temporary page. You can directly rewrite on articles tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} or {{copy-paste}}, and remove the tags when the rewrite is complete.

The article should not be copied over without first removing copied content. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. If the content is copied from an inaccessible source like a book or cannot be verified, please remove all text added by the contributor. If you copy any text from the old article, please leave a note on the listing or in your edit summaries of the rewrite. Reviewing clerks or administrators will then preserve the history of the old article.

Please review Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste and its linked guidelines as necessary to ensure the rewrite is compliant with policy. Repairing compatible copying issues is usually as simple as supplying proper attribution.

Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Misplaced Pages (or people editing on their behalf)

Shortcut

WP:IOWN

If you submitted work to Misplaced Pages which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, you must do one of the following to resolve the problem:

Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.

Letters and emails may take some time to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your email will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.

Please keep in mind that content previously published elsewhere may not meet Misplaced Pages's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.

Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.

Clerks and patrolling administrators

Copyright clerks

For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/Clerks.

Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Misplaced Pages, especially with copyright policies and their enforcement. On this board, they are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary. Clerks are periodically reviewed by other clerks and patrolling administrators.

Copyright problems administrators

For a more complete description of administrators on Misplaced Pages, please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators.

Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. This may involve evaluating listings personally or completing evaluations by clerks. Clerks are trusted in their work and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.

Closing listings

Pages can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed. VRT agents may close listings at any time.

For advice for resolving listings, see:

Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/Advice for admins (VRT agents, see section there)
Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/Advice for clerks

{{CPC}} may be used to denote resolutions of listings by administrators, clerks and VRT agents.

Listings of possible copyright problems

Update this page

Older than 7 days

Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 7 days. They will be processed at any time by clerks or administrators (see WP:CPAA). When every issue on a day is clear, the day may be removed.

New listings

Update this page Some listings may not be displayed on this page due to template transclusion limits. This can be alleviated by clearing the backlog.

New listings are made on daily reports transcluded on this page and are not directly added to it. To add a new listing, please go to today's section. Instructions for adding new listings can be found at What to list here. Editors may resolve issues with listings at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See the section on responding for more information.

17 December 2024

Traction motor (history · last edit · rewrite) from A considerable amount of text in this article is nearly identical to the text of the linked webpage. This identical text is mixed with other text, making it somewhat difficult to disentangle. I strongly suspect that, in this case, the text similarities may be at least partly due to the webpage copying text from Misplaced Pages without attribution, and not the other way around. A Quacking Duck (talk) 00:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
The text on the linked page is almost certainly copied from Misplaced Pages (as it existed on WP seven years before the site was first archived), but the edit adding the content in 2010 states "from electrical engineering AIEE manual 'DC and AC Motors and Control'". The American Institute of Electrical Engineers has not existed since 1962, but any of their texts newer than 31 December 1928 remain under copyright. – dudhhr_contribs_her 07:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The content mentions the Pennsylvania Railroad class GG1, which was introduced in 1935. If it is indeed copied from the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, it is not old enough to be in the public domain. – dudhhr_contribs_her 16:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC) disregard, that paragraph was added by a different editor. – dudhhr_contribs_her 16:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Unable to find the source but it was completely unsourced regardless. – Isochrone (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

18 December 2024

~~Wellington Presbyterian Children's Home (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://natlib.govt.nz/records/22477156. Gadfium (talk) 04:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)~~

My mistake, the material copied is under CC Attribute 3.0 according to and is attributed in the article.-Gadfium (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

20 December 2024

Affair of Porto Novo (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://archive.org/stream/sim_english-historical-review_1958-01_73_286/sim_english-historical-review_1958-01_73_286_djvu.txt. Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

21 December 2024

Extinction_(neurology) (history · last edit · rewrite) from multiple sources, including this one and this one. It appears that the article's issues originate in a student project that developed most of the article back in 2012. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Articles with close paraphrasing from August and October 2019

Beverage can printing (history · last edit · rewrite)
Hitscan (history · last edit · rewrite)
Intercontinental Football League (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://profootballresearchers.com/archives/Website_Files/Coffin_Corner/27-06-1101.pdf
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. – Isochrone (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
On Saudi Arabia (history · last edit · rewrite)
Attygalle murder (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.sundaytimes.lk/970817/plus5.html
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. – Isochrone (talk) 17:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
The Buszy (history · last edit · rewrite)
Ethnos360 (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. – Isochrone (talk) 20:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Get ready for Brexit (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/01/get-ready-for-brexit-government-launches-information-blitz
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. – Isochrone (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Candace Glendenning (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0322540/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm
Harry McCue (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://dundalkfcwhoswho.com/player.php?id=402
National Gallery of Modern Art (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://ngmaindia.gov.in/past-exhibits.asp
Vega flight VV15 (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.arianespace.com/press-release/vega-flight-vv15-findings-of-the-independent-inquiry-commissions-investigations/
Dan Welcher (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://web.archive.org/web/20070101161800/http://www.danwelcher.com/html/biography.html
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 18:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

MER-C 11:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

22 December 2024

Articles with close paraphrasing from November 2019 to January 2020

A-91 (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://modernfirearms.net/en/assault-rifles/russia-assault-rifles/a-91m-eng
Edward P. Brynn (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.academyofdiplomacy.org/member/edward-brynn/
Shon Hopwood (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/us/09bar.html
Anamika Khanna (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.news18.com/news/lifestyle/india-couture-week-icw-2017-designer-anamika-khanna-talks-about-her-collection-luxury-2017-1471575.html
Theodore C. Marceau (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://broadway.cas.sc.edu/content/theodore-c-marceau
Viable rewrite proposed; rewrite on temp page can be merged into the article. – dudhhr_contribs_her 04:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Rewrite moved into place. – dudhhr_contribs_her 04:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Douglas Richardson (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.royalancestry.net/about.html
Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://militera.lib.ru/research/suvorov8/18.html
Sorin Coțofană (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.imt.ro/cas/invited_speakers_cv.php?link=cotofana_cv
Immigration Act of 1891 (history · last edit · rewrite)
Kabali (soundtrack) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/music/Music-Review-Kabali/articleshow/52780315.cms
John Palms (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.citadel.edu/root/ssm-csmc/91-academics/schools/ssm/22251-dr-john-michael-palms
Organic Family Hymnal (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/articles/music/Rend_Collective_Experiment_Bringing_a_fresh_approach_to_worship_music/38854/p1/
FK Rudar Pljevlja (history · last edit · rewrite)

MER-C 13:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Footer

Misplaced Pages's current date is 24 December 2024. Put new article listings in Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/2024 December 24. Files should be handled by speedy deletion or Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion.

Categories: