Revision as of 16:29, 14 August 2007 view sourceLeolaursen (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,919 editsm Repairing link to disambiguation page - You can help!← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:05, 13 December 2024 view source Pur 0 0 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users805 editsm →Śruti and smriti: If we're doing IAST, then do it properlyTag: Visual edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Oldest scriptures of Hinduism}} | |||
:''"Veda" redirects here. For other uses, see ].'' | |||
{{redirect-multi|2|Veda|Vedic}} | |||
{{Pp|vandalism|small=yes}} | |||
{{EngvarB|date=March 2015}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2015}} | |||
{{Infobox religious text | |||
| religion = ]<br>] | |||
| image = 1500-1200 BCE Rigveda, manuscript page sample i, Mandala 1, Hymn 1 (Sukta 1), Adhyaya 1, lines 1.1.1 to 1.1.9, Sanskrit, Devanagari.jpg | |||
| alt = Four Vedas | |||
| language = ] | |||
| caption = Rigveda manuscript page, Mandala 1, Hymn 1 (Sukta 1), lines 1.1.1 to 1.1.9 (Sanskrit, Devanagari script) | |||
| period = ] | |||
:{{circa|1500}}–1200 BCE (]),<ref name="Flood 2003 69" />{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} | |||
:{{circa|1200}}–900 BCE (], ], ])<ref name="Flood 2003 69"/>{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}} | |||
| verses = 20,379 mantras<ref>{{cite web |title=Construction of the Vedas |website=VedicGranth.Org |url=https://sites.google.com/a/vedicgranth.org/www/what_are_vedic_granth/the-four-veda/interpretation-and-more/construction-of-the-vedas?mobile=true |access-date=3 July 2020 |archive-date=17 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210717035126/https://sites.google.com/a/vedicgranth.org/www/what_are_vedic_granth/the-four-veda/interpretation-and-more/construction-of-the-vedas?mobile=true |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
| wikisource = The Vedas | |||
|background=#FFC569}} | |||
{{Hindu scriptures}} | |||
]''.]] | |||
The '''Vedas''' (] |
The '''Vedas''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|v|eɪ|d|ə|z}}<ref>. '']''.</ref> or {{IPAc-en|ˈ|v|iː|d|ə|z}};<ref>'']'' Online (accessed 8 April 2023)</ref> {{Langx|sa|वेदः|lit=knowledge|translit=Vēdaḥ}}), sometimes collectively called '''the Veda''', are a large body of ] originating in ]. Composed in ], the texts constitute the oldest layer of ] and the oldest ] of ].<ref>see e.g. {{Harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1957|p=3}}; {{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|p=68}}; {{Harvnb|MacDonell|2004|pp=29–39}}.</ref><ref>''Sanskrit literature'' (2003) in Philip's Encyclopedia. Accessed 2007-08-09</ref><ref>Sanujit Ghose (2011). "" in ''World History Encyclopedia''.</ref> | ||
There are four Vedas: the ], the ], the ] and the ].<ref name=gflood/><ref>Bloomfield, M. The Atharvaveda and the Gopatha-Brahmana, (Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde II.1.b.) Strassburg 1899; Gonda, J. ''A history of Indian literature'': I.1 Vedic literature (Samhitas and Brahmanas); I.2 The Ritual Sutras. Wiesbaden 1975, 1977</ref> Each Veda has four subdivisions – the ]s (]s and ]s), the ]s (commentaries on and explanation of rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices – ]s), the ]s (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), and the ] (texts discussing ], philosophy and spiritual knowledge).<ref name=gflood>Gavin Flood (1996), ''An Introduction to Hinduism'', Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-521-43878-0}}, pp. 35–39</ref><ref name="A Bhattacharya 2006 pp. 8–14">A Bhattacharya (2006), ''Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology'', {{ISBN|978-0-595-38455-6}}, pp. 8–14; George M. Williams (2003), Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-533261-2}}, p. 285</ref><ref name="Jan Gonda 1975">Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-01603-2}}</ref> Some scholars add a fifth category – the ]s (worship).{{sfn|Bhattacharya|2006|pp=8–14}}{{sfn|Holdrege|1995|pp=351–357}} The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox ''sramana'' traditions.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=82}} The Samhitas and Brahmanas describe daily rituals and are generally meant for the ] and ] stages of the ] system, while the Aranyakas and ] are meant for the ] and ] stages, respectively. | |||
According to Hindu tradition, the Vedas are '']'' "not human compositions"<ref> Apte, pp. 109f. has "not of the authorship of man, of divine origin"</ref>, being supposed to have been directly revealed, and thus are called '']'' ("what is heard").<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=887}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Muller|1891|p=17-18}}</ref> | |||
Vedic ]s are recited at Hindu prayers, religious functions and other auspicious occasions. | |||
Vedas are ''{{IAST|]}}'' ("what is heard"),{{sfn|Apte|1965|p=887}} distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called ''{{IAST|]}}'' ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be '']'', which means "not of a man, superhuman"{{sfn|Apte|1965|loc="apauruSeya"}} and "impersonal, authorless",{{sfn|Sharma|2011|pp=196–197}}{{sfn|Westerhoff|2009|p=290}}{{sfn|Todd|2013|p=128}} revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient ] after intense meditation.{{sfn|Pollock|2011|pp=41–58}}{{sfn|Scharfe|2002|pp=13–14}} | |||
Philosophies and sects that developed in the Indian subcontinent have taken differing positions on the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy which cite the Vedas as their scriptural authority are classified as "orthodox" (]). Two other Indian philosophies, ] and ], did not accept the authority of the Vedas and evolved into separate religions. In Indian philosophy these groups are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-Vedic" (]) schools.<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=82}}</ref> | |||
The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate ].{{sfn|Wood|2007}}{{sfn|Hexam|2011|p=chapter 8}}{{sfn|Dwyer|2013}} The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their ] rather than the ], and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=347}} By reciting them the ] is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=347}} | |||
== Etymology and usage== | |||
The Sanskrit word ''{{IAST|véda}}'' "knowledge, wisdom" is derived from the root ''vid-'' "to know". This is reconstructed as being derived from the ] root ''{{PIE|*u̯eid-}}'', meaning "see" or "know".<ref>{{Harvnb|Monier-Williams|2006|p=1015}}; {{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=856}}</ref> | |||
The various ] and ] have taken differing positions on the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy that acknowledge the importance or primal authority of the Vedas comprise ] specifically and are together classified as the six "orthodox" (]) schools.{{refn|group=note|name="Freschi_2012"}} However, ] traditions, such as ], ], ], and ], which did not regard the Vedas as authoritative, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (]) schools.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=82}}<ref name="EB_astika"> and . '']'', 20 April 2016.</ref> | |||
As a noun, the word appears only in a single instance in the Rigveda, in ].19.5, translated by Griffith as "ritual lore": | |||
:''{{IAST| yáḥ samídhā yá âhutī / yó védena dadâśa márto agnáye / yó námasā svadhvaráḥ}}'' | |||
:"The mortal who hath ministered to Agni with oblation, fuel, ritual lore, and reverence, skilled in sacrifice." | |||
The noun is from PIE ''{{PIE|*u̯eidos}}'', cognate to Greek {{lang|grc|(ϝ)εἶδος}} "aspect, form". Not to be confused is the homonymous 1st and 3rd person singular perfect tense ''{{IAST|véda}}'', cognate to Greek {{lang|grc|(ϝ)οἶδα}} ''(w)oida'' "I know". Root cognate are Greek ], English ''wit'', ''witness'', German ''wissen'', Latin '']''.<ref>see e.g. Pokorny's 1959 '']'' s.v. ''{{PIE|u̯(e)id-}}''².</ref> | |||
==Etymology and usage== | |||
In its narrowest sense, the term Veda is used to refer to the ''Samhitas'' (collection of '']'', or chants) associated with the four canonical Vedas (Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda and Atharavaveda) though typically the reference also includes the ''Brahmanas'', ''Aranyakas'' and ''Upanishads'' attached to the ''Samhitas''. In post-Vedic speculation, the term was further extended to refer to '']s'' (epics) and '']'', each of which is sometimes designated as the "fifth Veda"; and in its widest interpretation, Veda can subsume "potentially all brahmanical texts, teachings and practices."<ref>{{Harvnb|Holredge|1995|p=7}}</ref> In its primary meaning, as a common noun meaning "knowledge"", ''{{IAST|veda}}'' can also be used to refer to fields of study unrelated to liturgy or ritual, freely compounded e.g. in ''{{IAST|agada-veda}}'' "medical science", ''{{IAST|sasya-veda}}'' "science of agriculture" or ''{{IAST|sarpa-veda}}'' "science of snakes"; ''{{IAST|durveda}}'' means "without knowledge, ignorant". | |||
The ] word ''{{IAST|véda}}'' "knowledge, wisdom" is derived from the root ''vid-'' "to know". This is reconstructed as being derived from the ] root ''{{PIE|*weyd-}}'', meaning "see" or "know".{{sfn|Monier-Williams|1899|loc=}}{{sfn|Apte|1965|p=856}} | |||
The noun is from Proto-Indo-European ''{{PIE|*weydos}}'', cognate to ] {{lang|grc|(ϝ)εἶδος}} "aspect", "form" . This is not to be confused with the homonymous 1st and 3rd person singular perfect tense ''{{IAST|véda}}'', cognate to Greek {{lang|grc|(ϝ)οἶδα}} (''(w)oida'') "I know". Root cognates are Greek ], English '']'', ] ''videō'' "I see", ] ве́дать (''védat''') "to know", etc.<ref>see e.g. Pokorny's 1959 '']'' s.v. ''{{PIE|u̯(e)id-}}''²; Rix' '']'', ''{{PIE|u̯ei̯d-}}''.</ref> | |||
== Dating == | |||
{{main|Vedic period}} | |||
The Sanskrit term ''{{IAST|veda}}'' as a common noun means "knowledge".{{sfn|Monier-Williams|1899|loc=}} The term in some contexts, such as hymn 10.93.11 of the '']'', means "obtaining or finding wealth, property",{{sfn|Monier-Williams|1899|loc=}} while in some others it means "a bunch of grass together" as in a broom or for ].{{sfn|Monier-Williams|1899|loc=}} | |||
The Vedas are arguably the ] that are still used. Most ]s agree that an ] existed long before a literary tradition gradually sets in from about the 2nd century BCE.<ref>For written texts during second century BCE see: Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=69}}; For composition and oral transmission for "many hundreds of years" before being written down, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=76}}.</ref> | |||
Due to the ephemeral nature of the manuscript material (birch bark or palm leaves), surviving manuscripts rarely surpass an age of a few hundred years. | |||
The oldest surviving manuscripts of the Rigveda are dated in the 11th century. | |||
==Vedic texts== | |||
The Vedic period lasts for at least a millennium, spanning the Late Bronze Age and the ]. {{Harvtxt|Flood|1996|p=37}} sums up mainstream estimates, according to which the Rigveda was composed from as early as 1200 BCE over a period of several centuries. The Vedic period reaches its peak only after the composition of the mantra texts, with the establishment of the various ]s all over Northern India which annotated the mantra ] with ] commentaries, and reaches its end in the age of ] and ] and the rise of the ] (archaeologically, ]). Michael Witzel gives a time span of c. 1500 BCE and c. 500-400 BCE.<ref>Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=68}}</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
== |
===Vedic Sanskrit corpus=== | ||
The term "Vedic texts" is used in two distinct meanings: | |||
Vedic texts are traditionally categorized into four classes: the {{IAST|Saṃhitās}} (mantras), ]s, ]s, and ]s.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=51}}.</ref><ref>Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=69}}.</ref> Also classified as "Vedic" is certain ] literature, i.e. the ]s and the ]s. | |||
# Texts composed in ] during the ] (]) | |||
# Any text considered as "connected to the Vedas" or a "corollary of the Vedas"<ref>according to ], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326083505/http://hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1105.htm |date=26 March 2009 }}, "Hindus themselves often use the term to describe anything connected to the Vedas and their corollaries (e.g. Vedic culture)."</ref> | |||
* The Samhita (Sanskrit ''{{IAST|saṃhitā}}'', "collection"), are collections of metric texts ("]s"). There are four "Vedic" Samhitas: the ], ], ], and ], most of which are available in several recensions (''{{IAST|śākhā}}''). In some contexts, the term Veda is used to refer to these Samhitas. This is the oldest layer of Vedic texts, apart from the Rigvedic hymns, which were probably essentially complete by 1200 BC, dating to ca. the 12th to 10th centuries BC. The complete corpus of Vedic mantras as collected in ]'s ''Vedic Concordance'' (1907) consists of some 89,000 ]s (]), of which 72,000 occur in the four Samhitas.<ref>37,575 are Rigvedic. Of the remaining, 34,857 appear in the other three samhitas, and 16,405 are known only from Brahmanas, Upanishads or Sutras)</ref> | |||
The corpus of ] texts includes: | |||
* The ] are prose texts that discuss, in technical fashion, the solemn sacrificial rituals as well as comment on their meaning and many connected themes. Each of the Brahmanas is associated with one of the Samhitas or its recensions. The Brahmanas may either form separate texts or can be partly integrated into the text of the Samhitas. They may also include the Aranyakas and Upanishads. | |||
* The ] (Sanskrit ''{{IAST|saṃhitā}}'', "collection"), are collections of metric texts ("]s"). There are four "Vedic" Samhitas: the ], ], ] and ], most of which are available in several ]s (''{{IAST|śākhā}}''). In some contexts, the term ''Veda'' is used to refer only to these Samhitas, the collection of mantras. This is the oldest layer of Vedic texts, which were composed between {{circa|1500}}–1200 BCE (Rig Veda book 2–9),{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} and 1200–900 BCE for the other ''Samhitas''. The Samhitas contain invocations to deities like ] and ], "to secure their benediction for success in battles or for welfare of the clan."{{sfn|Prasad|2020|p=150}} The complete corpus of Vedic mantras as collected in ]'s ''Vedic Concordance'' (1907) consists of some 89,000 ] (]), of which 72,000 occur in the four Samhitas.<ref>37,575 are Rigvedic. Of the remaining, 34,857 appear in the other three Samhitas, and 16,405 are known only from Brahmanas, Upanishads or Sutras</ref> | |||
* The ]s are prose texts that comment on and explain the solemn rituals as well as expound on their meaning and many connected themes. Each of the Brahmanas is associated with one of the Samhitas or its recensions.{{sfn|Klostermaier|1994|pp=67–69}}<ref name="ebri"/> The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the ]), were complete by about 700 BCE.<ref name=mw>], "Tracing the Vedic dialects" in ''Dialectes dans les litteratures Indo-Aryennes'' ed. Caillat, Paris, 1989, 97–265.</ref><ref name=bcp>Biswas et al (1989), Cosmic Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-521-34354-1}}, pp. 42–43</ref> The Brahmanas may either form separate texts or can be partly integrated into the text of the Samhitas. They may also include the Aranyakas and Upanishads. | |||
* The ]s, "wilderness texts" or "forest treaties", were composed by people who meditated in the woods as recluses and are the third part of the Vedas. The texts contain discussions and interpretations of ceremonies, from ritualistic to symbolic meta-ritualistic points of view.<ref name="jago"/> It is frequently read in secondary literature. | |||
* Older ] (], ], ], ], ], and others),<ref name="Flood 2003 69">{{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|p=69}}.</ref><ref name="Michaels 2004 51">{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=51}}.</ref> composed between 800 BCE and the end of the Vedic period.<ref name="Mahony1998p271">{{cite book|author=William K. Mahony|title=The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B1KR_kE5ZYoC |year=1998|publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-3579-3 |page=271}}</ref> The ] are largely philosophical works, some in dialogue form. They are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions.<ref name=wendydoniger/><ref>Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al.), State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7914-1080-6}}, p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";<br />Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, {{ISBN|978-1-59257-846-7}}, pp. 208–210</ref> Of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads are still influential in Hinduism.<ref name=wendydoniger>Wendy Doniger (1990), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, 1st Edition, University of Chicago Press, {{ISBN|978-0-226-61847-0}}, pp. 2–3; Quote: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."</ref><ref>] (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-535242-9}}, p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth , in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".</ref> | |||
* The texts considered "Vedic" in the sense of "corollaries of the Vedas" are less clearly defined, and may include numerous post-Vedic texts such as the later ] and the ], such as ] and ], which are smriti texts. Together, the Vedas and these Sutras form part of the Vedic Sanskrit corpus.<ref name="Flood 2003 69"/>{{refn|group=note|For a table of all Vedic texts see {{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|pp=100–101}}.}}{{refn|group=note|The Vedic Sanskrit corpus is incorporated in '']'' (''{{IAST|Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa}}'') prepared from 1930 under Vishva Bandhu, and published in five volumes in 1935–1965. Its scope extends to about 400 texts, including the entire Vedic Sanskrit corpus besides some "sub-Vedic" texts. Volume I: Samhitas, Volume II: Brahmanas and Aranyakas, Volume III: Upanishads, Volume IV: Vedangas; A revised edition, extending to about 1800 pages, was published in 1973–1976.}} | |||
While production of Brahmanas and Aranyakas ceased with the end of the Vedic period, additional Upanishads were composed after the end of the Vedic period.{{sfn|Witzel|2003|pp=100–101}} The ]s, ]s, and ], among other things, interpret and discuss the ] in philosophical and metaphorical ways to explore abstract concepts such as the Absolute (]), and the soul or the self (]), introducing ] philosophy, one of the major trends of later ]. In other parts, they show evolution of ideas, such as from actual sacrifice to symbolic sacrifice, and of spirituality in the Upanishads. This has inspired later Hindu scholars such as ] to classify each Veda into ''karma-kanda'' (कर्म खण्ड, action/sacrificial ritual-related sections, the ''Samhitas'' and ''Brahmanas''); and ''jnana-kanda'' (ज्ञान खण्ड, knowledge/spirituality-related sections, mainly the Upanishads').{{sfn|Bartley|2001|p=490}}{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=30}}{{sfn|Nakamura|1983|p=409}}{{sfn|Bhattacharya|2006|p=9}}{{sfn|Knapp|2005|pp=10–11}}{{refn|group=note|name="Roer"|Edward Roer (Translator), {{Google books|3uwDAAAAMAAJ|Shankara's Introduction}} to ''Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad'' at pp. 1–5: "The Vedas are divided in two parts, the first is the karma-kanda, the ceremonial part, also (called) purva-kanda, and treats on ceremonies; the second part is the jnana kanda, the part which contains knowledge, also named uttara-kanda or posterior part, and unfolds the knowledge of Brahma or the universal soul."}} | |||
*The ], or "wilderness texts", are the concluding part of the Brahmanas that contain discussions and interpretations of dangerous rituals (to be studied outside the settlement) and various sorts of additional materials. | |||
=== Śruti and smṛti === | |||
*The ] are largely philosophical works in dialog form. They discuss question of nature philosophy and the fate of the soul, and contain some mystic and spiritual interpretations of the Vedas. For long, they hav been regarded as their putative end and essence, and are thus known as Vedānta ("the end of the Vedas"). Taken together, they are the basis of the ] school. | |||
Vedas are ''{{IAST|]}}'' ("what is heard"),{{sfn|Apte|1965|p=887}} distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called ''{{IAST|]}}'' ("what is remembered"). This indigenous system of categorization was adopted by ] and, while it is subject to some debate, it is still widely used. As ] explains: | |||
{{blockquote|These classifications are often not tenable for linguistic and formal reasons: There is not only ''one'' collection at any one time, but rather several handed down in separate Vedic schools; Upanişads are sometimes not to be distinguished from {{IAST|Āraṇyakas}} ; {{IAST|Brāhmaṇas}} contain older strata of language attributed to the {{IAST|Saṃhitās}}; there are various dialects and locally prominent traditions of the Vedic schools. Nevertheless, it is advisable to stick to the division adopted by Max Müller because it follows the Indian tradition, conveys the historical sequence fairly accurately, and underlies the current editions, translations, and monographs on Vedic literature."<ref name="Michaels 2004 51"/>}} | |||
Among the widely known śrutis include the Vedas and their embedded texts – the ]s, the ]s, the ]s and the ]s. The well-known smṛtis include ], ] and the epics ] and ], amongst others. | |||
This group of texts is called ''shruti'' (Sanskrit: ''{{IAST|śruti}}''; "the heard"). Since post-Vedic times it has been considered to be revealed wisdom, as distinct from other texts, collectively known as ''smriti'' (Sanskrit: ''{{IAST|smṛti}}''; "the remembered"), that is texts that are considered to be of human origin. This system of categorization was developed by ] and, while it is subject to some debate, it is still widely used. As Axel Michaels explains: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
These classifications are often not tenable for linguistic and formal reasons: There is not only ''one'' collection at any one time, but rather several handed down in separate Vedic schools; Upanişads ... are sometimes not to be distinguished from {{IAST|Āraṇyakas}}...; {{IAST|Brāhmaṇas}} contain older strata of language attributed to the {{IAST|Saṃhitās}}; there are various dialects and locally prominent traditions of the Vedic schools. Nevertheless, it is advisable to stick to the division adopted by Max Müller because it follows the Indian tradition, conveys the historical sequence fairly accurately, and underlies the current editions, translations, and monographs on Vedic literature."<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=51}}.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
===Authorship=== | |||
The ], regarded as belonging to the smriti, are late Vedic in language and content, thus forming part of the Vedic Sanskrit corpus.<ref>Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=69}}.</ref><ref>For a table of all Vedic texts see Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=100–101}}.</ref> | |||
Hindus consider the Vedas to be '']'', which means "not of a man, superhuman"{{sfn|Apte|1965|loc="apauruSeya"}} and "impersonal, authorless".{{sfn|Sharma|2011|pp=196–197}}{{sfn|Westerhoff|2009|p=290}}{{sfn|Todd|2013|p=128}} The Vedas, for orthodox Indian theologians, are considered revelations seen by ancient ] after intense meditation, and texts that have been more carefully preserved since ancient times.{{sfn|Pollock|2011|pp=41–58}}{{sfn|Scharfe|2002|pp=13–14}} In the Hindu Epic '']'', the creation of Vedas is credited to ].<ref> Bruce M. Sullivan, Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 85–86</ref> The Vedic hymns themselves assert that they were skillfully created by '']s'' (sages), after inspired creativity, just as a carpenter builds a chariot.{{sfn|Scharfe|2002|pp=13–14}}{{refn|group=note|"As a skilled craftsman makes a car, a singer I, Mighty One! this hymn for thee have fashioned. If thou, O Agni, God, accept it gladly, may we obtain thereby the heavenly Waters". – ''Rigveda 5.2.11'', Translated by Ralph T.H. Griffith<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.wikisource.org/The_Rig_Veda/Mandala_5/Hymn_2|title=The Rig Veda|website=Wikisource}}</ref>}} | |||
The composition of the Shrauta and Grhya Sutras (ca. 6th century BC) marks the end of the Vedic period , and at the same time the beginning of the flourishing of the "circum-Vedic" scholarship of ], introducing the early flowering of classical ] in the ] period. | |||
The oldest part of the Rig Veda ''Samhita'' was orally composed in north-western India (]) between {{circa}} 1500 and 1200 BCE,{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} while book 10 of the Rig Veda, and the other Samhitas were composed between 1200 and 900 BCE more eastward, between the ] and the ] rivers, the heartland of ] and the ] ({{circa|1200|900 BCE}}).{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}}{{sfn|Witzel|1995|p=4}}{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=49}}{{sfn|Witzel|2008|p=68}}{{sfn|Frazier|2011|p=344}} The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the ] of the Samhitas, date to {{circa|1000}}–500 BCE. | |||
While production of Brahmanas and Aranyakas ceases with the end of the Vedic period, there is a large number of Upanishads composed after the end of the Vedic period. While most of the ten ] Upanishads can be considered to date to the Vedic or Mahajanapada period, most of the 108 Upanishads of the full ] canon date to the Common Era. | |||
The ], ], and ] often interpret the polytheistic and ritualistic ] in philosophical and metaphorical ways to explore abstract concepts such as the Absolute (]), and the soul or the self (]), introducing ] philosophy, the basis of later ]. | |||
According to tradition, '']'' is the compiler of the Vedas, who arranged the four kinds of ''mantras'' into four ''Samhitas'' (Collections).{{sfn|Holdrege|2012|pp=249, 250}}{{sfn|Dalal|2014|p=}} | |||
== Vedic schools or recensions == | |||
{{main|Shakha}} | |||
==Chronology, transmission, and interpretation== | |||
Study of the extensive body of Vedic texts has been organized into a number of different schools or branches (Sanskrit ''{{IAST|śākhā}}'', literally "branch" or "limb") each of which specialized in learning certain texts.<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=39}}.</ref> Multiple recensions are known for each of the Vedas, and each Vedic text may have a number of schools associated with it. Elaborate methods for preserving the text were originally based on memorizing by heart instead of writing. Specific techniques for parsing and chanting the texts were used to assist in the memorization process. (''See also: ]'') | |||
{{See also|Vedic period}} | |||
===Chronology=== | |||
Exegetical literature developed in the Vedic schools but comparatively few early medieval commentaries have survived. ], from the 14th century, is known for his elaborate commentaries on the Vedic texts. While some evidence suggests that every member of the upper three classes (varna) was allowed to study the Vedas and that none but a few Vedic authors (Rishis) were women, the later ]s, from the ] age, dictate that women and ]s were neither required nor allowed to study the Veda.{{Fact|date=April 2007}} These ]s regard the study of the Vedas a religious duty of the three upper ] (Brahmins, ]s and ]s).{{Fact|date=April 2007}} | |||
The Vedas are among the ].{{sfn|Dutt|2006|p=36}} The bulk of the Rigveda Samhita was composed in the northwestern region (Punjab) of the ], most likely between {{circa}} 1500 and 1200 BCE,{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}}{{sfn|Witzel|1995|p=4}}{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=454}} although a wider approximation of {{circa}} 1700–1100 BCE has also been given.{{sfn|Oberlies|1998|p=158}}{{sfn|Kumar|2014|p=179}}{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} The other three Samhitas are considered to date from the time of the ], approximately {{circa}} 1200–900 BCE.<ref name="Flood 2003 69" /> The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the ] of the Samhitas, date to {{circa|1000}}–500 BCE, resulting in a ], spanning the mid 2nd to mid 1st millennium BCE, or the ] and the ].{{refn|group=note|] sums up mainstream estimates, according to which the Rigveda was compiled from as early as 1500 BCE over a period of several centuries.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}}}} The Vedic period reaches its peak only after the composition of the mantra texts, with the establishment of the various ]s all over Northern India which annotated the mantra ] with ] discussions of their meaning, and reaches its end in the age of ] and ] and the rise of the ] (archaeologically, ]). ] gives a time span of {{circa|1500}} to {{circa|500}}–400 BCE. Witzel makes special reference to the Near Eastern ] of the 14th century BCE, the only epigraphic record of Indo-Aryan contemporary to the Rigvedic period. He gives 150 BCE (]) as a ] for all Vedic Sanskrit literature, and 1200 BCE (the early ]) as ] for the Atharvaveda.{{sfn|Witzel|2003|p=68}} | |||
== |
===Transmission=== | ||
The Vedas were orally transmitted since their composition in the ] for several millennia.{{sfn|Wood|2007}}<ref name="Witzel2003"/>{{sfn|Holdrege|1995|p=344}} The authoritative transmission{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=345}} of the Vedas is by an ] in a '']'' from father to son or from teacher (''guru'') to student (''shishya''),{{sfn|Wood|2007}}{{sfn|Hexam|2011|p=chapter 8}}{{sfn|Holdrege|1995|p=344}}{{sfn|Broo|2016|p=92}}{{sfn|Pruthi|2004|p=286}} believed to be initiated by the Vedic '']'' who heard the ].{{sfn|Holdrege|2012|p=165}} Only this tradition, embodied by a living teacher, can teach the correct pronunciation of the sounds and explain hidden meanings, in a way the "dead and entombed manuscript" cannot do.{{sfn|Broo|2016|p=92}}{{refn|group=note|{{harvnb|Broo|2016|p=92}} quotes Harold G. Coward and K. Kunjunni Raja.}} As Leela Prasad states, "According to ], the "correct tradition" (''sampradaya'') has as much authority as the written Shastra", explaining that the tradition "bears the authority to clarify and provide direction in the application of knowledge".{{sfn|Prasad|2007|p=125}} | |||
The canonical division of the Vedas is fourfold (''{{IAST|turīya}}'') viz.,<ref>{{Harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1957|p=3}}; Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=68}}</ref> | |||
#] (RV) | |||
#] (YV, with the main division ] vs. ]) | |||
#] (SV) | |||
#] (AV) | |||
Of these, the first three were the principal original division, also called ''{{IAST|trayī}}'', "the triple ''{{IAST|Vidyā}}''", that is, "the triple sacred science" of reciting hymns (RV), performing sacrifices (YV), and chanting (SV).<ref>{{Harvnb|MacDonell|2004|p=29-39}}</ref><ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|p=257-348}}</ref> This triplicity is so introduced in the ]s (], ] and others), but the Rigveda is the only original work of the three with the other two largely borrowing from it. | |||
The emphasis in this transmission{{refn|group=note|Of the complete Veda, by ''pāțha-śālā'' (priestly schools), as distinguished from the transmission in the ''pūjā'', the daily services.{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|pp=344–345}}}} is on the "proper articulation and pronunciation of the Vedic sounds", as prescribed in the ],{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|p=345}} the ] (Vedic study) of sound as uttered in a Vedic recitation,{{sfn|Banerji|1989|pp=323–324}}{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|pp=477–495}} mastering the texts "literally forward and backward in fully acoustic fashion".{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=345}} Houben and Rath note that the Vedic textual tradition cannot simply be characterized as oral, "since it also depends significantly on a memory culture".{{sfn|Rath|2012|p=22}} The Vedas were preserved with precision with the help of elaborate ],{{sfn|Wood|2007}}{{sfn|Hexam|2011|p=chapter 8}}{{sfn|Dwyer|2013}} such as memorizing the texts in eleven different modes of recitation ('']s''),{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=345}} using the alphabet as a ],{{sfn|Griffiths|1999|p=122}}{{sfn|Rath|2012|p=19}}<!-- **START OF NOTE** -->{{refn|group=note|Several authors refer to the Chinese Buddhist Monk I-Tsing, who visited India in the 7th century to retrieve Buddhist texts and gave examples of mnemonic techniques used in India:{{sfn|Griffiths|1999|p=122}} "In India there are two traditional ways in which one can attain great intellectual power. Firstly by repeatedly committing to memory the intellect is developed; secondly the alphabet fixes (to) one's ideas. By this way, after a practice of ten days or a month, a student feels his thoughts rise like a fountain, and can commit to memory whatever he has heard once."{{sfn|Rath|2012|p=19}}{{sfn|Griffiths|1999|p=122}}}}<!-- **END OF NOTE** --> "matching physical movements (such as nodding the head) with particular sounds and chanting in a group"{{sfn|Doniger|2010|p=106}} and visualizing sounds by using '']s'' (hand signs).{{Sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|p=479}} This provided an additional visual confirmation, and also an alternate means to check the reading integrity by the audience, in addition to the audible means.{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|p=479}} Houben and Rath note that a strong "memory culture" existed in ancient India when texts were transmitted orally, before the advent of writing in the early first millennium CE.{{sfn|Rath|2012|p=19}} According to ], criticising the ]-Watt hypothesis "according to which literacy is more reliable than orality",{{sfn|Schiffman|2012|p=171}} this tradition of oral transmission "is closely related to Indian forms of science" and "by far the more remarkable" than the relatively recent tradition of written transmission.<!-- **START OF NOTE** -->{{refn|group=note|name="Staal_discoveries"|Staal: "by far the more remarkable , not merely because it is characteristically Indian and unlike anything we find elsewhere, but also because it has led to scientific discoveries that are of enduring interest and from which the contemporary West still has much to learn." {{harvtxt|Schiffman|2012|p=171}}, quoting {{harvtxt|Staal|1986|p=27}}<br />Staal argued that the ancient Indian grammarians, especially ], had completely mastered methods of linguistic theory not rediscovered again until the 1950s and the applications of modern mathematical logic to linguistics by ]. (Chomsky himself has said that the first ] in the modern sense was Panini's grammar).<ref name=front> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510134321/http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1825/18250150.htm |date=May 10, 2012 }}, ]</ref> These early Indian methods allowed the construction of discrete, potentially infinite generative systems. Remarkably, these early linguistic systems were codified orally, though writing was then used to develop them in some way. The formal basis for Panini's methods involved the use of "auxiliary" markers, rediscovered in the 1930s by the logician ].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Kadvany, John|title=Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion|journal=Journal of Indian Philosophy|year=2007|pages=487–520|volume=35|issue=5–6|doi=10.1007/s10781-007-9025-5|citeseerx=10.1.1.565.2083|s2cid=52885600}}</ref>}}<!-- **END OF NOTE** --> | |||
Thus, the Mantras are properly of three forms, 1. ''Ric'', which are verses of praise in metre, and intended for loud recitation; 2. ''Yajus'', which are in prose, and intended for recitation in a lower tone at sacrifices; 3. ''Sāman'', which are in metre, and intended for chanting at the ] ceremonies. The Yajurveda and Samaveda are not so much independent collections of prayers and hymns as special prayer- and hymn-books intended as manuals for the ] and ] priests respectively. | |||
While according to Mookerji, ] (''vedarthajnana''{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|p=328}} or '']-]''{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=35}}{{refn|group=note|name="artha"}}) of the words of the Vedas was part of the ],{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=35}} Holdrege and other Indologists{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=346}} have noted that in the transmission of the ''Samhitas'', the emphasis is on the phonology of the sounds ('']'') and not on the meaning ('']'') of the mantras.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=346}}{{sfn|Klostermaier|2007|p=55}}{{sfn|Broo|2016|p=92}} Already at the end of the Vedic period their original meaning had become obscure for "ordinary people",{{sfn|Klostermaier|2007|p=55}}{{refn|group=note|name="Kautas"|{{harvnb|Klostermaier|2007|p=55}}: "Kautas, a teacher mentioned in the '']'' by '']'' (ca. 500 BCE), a work devoted to an etymology of Vedic words that were no longer understood by ordinary people, held that the word of the Veda was no longer perceived as meaningful "normal" speech but as a fixed sequence of sounds, whose meaning was obscure beyond recovery."<br /><br />The tenth through twelfth volumes of the first Prapathaka of the ] (800-600 BCE) describe a legend about priests and it criticizes how they go about reciting verses and singing hymns without any idea what they mean or the divine principle they signify.<ref name=pauldeussen112>Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1468-4}}, pages 80-84</ref>}} and '']s'', etymological compendia, were developed to preserve and clarify the original meaning of many Sanskrit words.{{sfn|Klostermaier|2007|p=55}}{{sfn|Jackson|2016|p="Sayana, Vidyaranya’s brother"}} According to Staal, as referenced by Holdrege, though the mantras may have a discursive meaning, when the mantras are recited in the Vedic rituals "they are disengaged from their original context and are employed in ways that have little or nothing to do with their meaning".{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=346}}{{refn|group=note|According to Holdrege, ''srotriyas'' (a group of male Brahmin reciters who are masters of ''sruti''{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=345}}) "frequently do not understand what they recite" when reciting the ''Samhitas'', merely preserving the sound of the text.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=346}}}} The words of the mantras are "themselves sacred",{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|pp=346–347}} and "do not constitute ]".{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=347}} Instead, as Klostermaier notes, in their application in Vedic rituals they become ] sounds, "means to an end".{{refn|group=note|Klostermaier: "''Brahman'', derived from the root ''bŗh'' <nowiki>=</nowiki> to grow, to become great, was originally identical with the Vedic word, that makes people prosper: words were the pricipan means to approach the gods who dwelled in a different sphere. It was not a big step from this notion of "reified ]" to that "of the speech-act being looked at implicitly and explicitly as a means to an end." {{harvnb|Klostermaier|2007|p=55}} quotes {{harvnb|Deshpande|1990|p=4}}.}} Holdrege notes that there are scarce commentaries on the meaning of the mantras, in contrast to the number of commentaries on the Brahmanas and Upanishads, but states that the lack of emphasis on the "discursive meaning does not necessarily imply that they are meaningless".{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|pp=346,347}} In the Brahmanical perspective, the sounds have their own meaning, mantras are considered as "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=347}} By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base. As long as the purity of the sounds is preserved, the recitation of the ''mantras'' will be efficacious, irrespective of whether their discursive meaning is understood by human beings."{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=347}}{{refn|group=note|name="Coward2008_mimamsa"|{{harvnb|Coward|2008|p=114}}: "For the ] the ultimate reality is nothing other than the eternal words of the Vedas. They did not accept the existence of a single supreme creator god, who might have composed the Veda. According to the Mimamsa, gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. The power of the gods, then, is nothing other than the power of the mantras that name them."}} Frazier further notes that "later Vedic texts sought deeper understanding of the reasons the rituals worked", which indicates that the Brahmin communities considered study to be a "process of understanding".{{sfn|Frazier|2011|p=34}} | |||
Subsequently, the Atharvaveda was added as the fourth Veda. Its status was probably not completely accepted till after ], which often speaks of the three Vedas, calling them ''trayam-brahma-sanātanam'', "the triple eternal Veda". The Atharvaveda like the Rigveda, is a collection of original hymns mixed up with incantations, borrowing little from the Rig and having no direct relation to sacrifices, but supposed by mere recitation to produce long life, to cure diseases, or effect the ruin of enemies. | |||
A literary tradition is traceable in post-Vedic times, after the rise of ] in the ],{{refn|group=note|The early Buddhist texts are also generally believed to be of oral tradition, with the first Pali Canon written many centuries after the death of the Buddha.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Donald S. Lopez Jr. |year=1995|title= Authority and Orality in the Mahāyāna|journal= Numen|volume= 42 |number= 1 |pages= 21–47 |jstor= 3270278|doi=10.1163/1568527952598800 |hdl=2027.42/43799 |url= https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43799/1/11076_1995_Article_1568527952598800.pdf|hdl-access= free }}</ref>}} perhaps earliest in the ] recension of the Yajurveda about the 1st century BCE; however oral tradition of transmission remained active.<ref name="Witzel2003">{{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|p=69}}; For oral composition and oral transmission for "many hundreds of years" before being written down, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=76}}.</ref> ] has argued for an earlier literary tradition, concluding that the Vedas bear hallmarks of a literate culture along with oral transmission,{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|p=192}}{{sfn|Goody|1987}} but Goody's views have been strongly criticised by Falk, Lopez Jr,. and Staal, though they have also found some support.{{sfn|Lopez|2016|pp=35–36}}{{sfn|Olson|Cole|2013|p=15}} | |||
Each of the four Vedas consists of the metrical ] or Samhita and the prose ] part, giving directions for the detail of the ceremonies at which the Mantras were to be used and explanations of the legends connected with the Mantras. Both these portions are termed ], heard but not composed or written down by men. Each of the four Vedas seems to have passed through numerous ]s or schools, giving rise to various recensions of the text. They each have an Index or ], the principal work of this kind being the general Index or ''{{IAST|Sarvānukramaṇī}}''. | |||
The Vedas were written down only after 500 BCE,{{sfn|Wood|2007}}<ref name="Witzel2003"/><ref name=":0">{{Harvnb|Avari|2007|pp=69–70, 76}}</ref> but only the orally transmitted texts are regarded as authoritative, given the emphasis on the exact pronunciation of the sounds.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=345}} Witzel suggests that attempts to write down the Vedic texts towards the end of 1st millennium BCE were unsuccessful, resulting in ''smriti'' rules explicitly forbidding the writing down of the Vedas.<ref name="Witzel2003"/> Due to the ephemeral nature of the manuscript material (birch bark or palm leaves), surviving manuscripts rarely surpass an age of a few hundred years.<ref>{{Citation | last = Brodd | first = Jeffrey | title = World Religions | publisher = Saint Mary's Press | year = 2003 | location = Winona, MN | isbn = 978-0-88489-725-5 }}</ref> The ] has a Rigveda manuscript from the 14th century;<ref>{{cite book|last1=Jamison|first1=Stephanie W.|last2=Brereton|first2=Joel P.|title=The Rigveda – The Earliest Religious Poetry of India, Volume 1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fgzVAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA18 |year=2014|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-972078-1|page=18}}</ref> however, there are a number of older Veda manuscripts in ] that are dated from the 11th century onwards.<ref>{{cite web|title=Cultural Heritage of Nepal|url=http://www.uni-hamburg.de/ngmcp/about_ngmpp_e.html|website=Nepal-German Manuscript Preservation Project|publisher=]|access-date=4 November 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140918022828/http://www.uni-hamburg.de/ngmcp/about_ngmpp_e.html|archive-date=18 September 2014|df=dmy-all}}</ref> | |||
=== The Rig-Veda === | |||
{{main|Rigveda}} | |||
===Vedic learning=== | |||
The ] Samhita is the oldest significant extant Indian text.<ref>For Rig Veda as the "oldest significant extant Indian text" see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> It is a collection of 1,028 ] ] and 10,600 verses in all, organized into ten books (Sanskrit: ''mandalas'').<ref>For 1,028 hymns and 10,600 verses and division into ten mandalas, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> The hymns are dedicated to ].<ref>For characterization of content and mentions of deities including Agni, Indra, Varuna, and Surya, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> | |||
{{Main|Svādhyāya}} | |||
The Vedas, Vedic rituals and its ancillary sciences called the ]s, were part of the curriculum at ancient universities such as at ], ] and ].{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013}}{{sfn|Frazier|2011|page=}}<ref>{{cite book|last1=Walton|first1=Linda|title="Educational institutions" in The Cambridge World History Vol. 5 |date=2015 |publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0-521-19074-9|page=122}}</ref><ref>Sukumar Dutt (1988) . ''Buddhist Monks And Monasteries of India: Their History And Contribution To Indian Culture.'' George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London. {{ISBN|81-208-0498-8}}. pp. 332–333</ref> According to Deshpande, "the tradition of the ] also contributed significantly to the preservation and interpretation of Vedic texts."{{sfn|Deshpande|1990|p=33}} ] (4th c. BCE{{sfn|Misra|2000|p=49}}) wrote the '']'', which reflects the concerns about the loss of meaning of the mantras,{{refn|group=note|name="Kautas"}} while ]s (4th c. BCE) '']'' is the most important surviving text of the Vyākaraṇa traditions. ] scholar ]s (14th c. CE) major ''Vedartha Prakasha''{{refn|group=note|Literally, "the meaning of the Vedas made manifest."}} is a rare{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=354}} commentary on the Vedas, which is also referred to by contemporary scholars.{{sfn|Jackson|2016|loc=ch.3}} | |||
The books were composed by sages and poets from different preistly groups over a period of at least 500 years, which Avari dates as 1400 BCE to 900 BCE, if not earlier<ref>For composition over 500 years dated 1400 BCE to 900 BCE, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> According to Max Müller, based on internal evidence (philological and linguistic), the Rigveda was composed roughly between 1700–1100 BCE (the early ]) in the ] (]) region of the ].<ref>India: What Can It Teach Us: A Course of Lectures Delivered Before the University of Cambridge by F. Max Müller; World Treasures of the Library of Congress Beginnings by Irene U. Chambers, Michael S. Roth.</ref> Michael Witzel believes that the Rig Veda must have been composed more or less in the period 1450-1350 BCE.<ref>Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=68}}.</ref> | |||
Yaska and Sayana, reflecting an ancient understanding, state that the Veda can be interpreted in three ways, giving "the truth about ], '']'' and ]."{{sfn|Coward|Raja|Potter|1990|p=106}}{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=34}}{{refn|group=note|Sayana repeats Yaska; see ].}} The ''pūrva-kāņda'' (or ''karma-kanda''), the part of the Veda dealing with ritual, gives knowledge of ''dharma'', "which brings us satisfaction." The ''uttara-kanda'' (or '']''),{{refn|group=note|The ''Upanishads''.{{sfn|Nakamura|1983|p=409}}}} the part of the Veda dealing with the knowledge of the absolute, gives knowledge of ''Parabrahma'', "which fulfills all of our desires."{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=30}} According to Holdrege, for the exponents of ''karma-kandha'' the Veda is to be "inscribed in the minds and hearts of men" by memorization and recitation, while for the exponents of the ''jnana-kanda'' and meditation the Vedas express a transcendental reality which can be approached with mystical means.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|pp=355, 356–357}} | |||
There are strong linguistic and cultural similarities between the Rigveda and the early Iranian ], deriving from the ] times, often associated with the ]; the earliest horse-drawn chariots were found at Andronovo sites in the ] cultural area near the ] and date to ca. 2000 BCE.<ref>{{cite book | last = Drews | first = Robert | title = Early Riders: The beginnings of mounted warfare in Asia and Europe | year = 2004 | publisher = Routledge | location = New York | pages = 50}}</ref> | |||
Holdrege notes that in Vedic learning "priority has been given to recitation over interpretation" of the Samhitas.{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=354}} Galewicz states that Sayana, a ] scholar,{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|p=40}}{{sfn|Galewicz|2011|p=338}}{{sfn|Collins|2009|loc="237 Sayana"}} "thinks of the Veda as something to be trained and mastered to be put into practical ritual use", noticing that "it is not the meaning of the mantras that is most essential but rather the perfect mastering of their sound form."{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|p=41}} According to Galewicz, Sayana saw the purpose (''artha'') of the Veda as the "'']'' of carrying out sacrifice", giving precedence to the ''Yajurveda''.{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|p=40}} For Sayana, whether the mantras had meaning depended on the context of their practical usage.{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|p=41}} This conception of the Veda, as a repertoire to be mastered and performed, takes precedence over the internal meaning or "autonomous message of the hymns."{{sfn|Galewicz|2004|pp=41–42}} Most ] are not performed in the modern era, and those that are, are rare.{{sfn|Michaels|2016|pp=237–238}} | |||
=== The Yajur-Veda === | |||
{{main|Yajurveda}} | |||
The ] ("Veda of sacrificial formulas") consists of archaic prose mantras and also in part of verses borrowed from the Rig-Veda. Its purpose was practical, in that each mantra must accompany an action in sacrifice but, unlike the Sama-Veda, it was compiled to apply to all sacrificial rites, not merely the Soma offering. There are two major ]s of this Veda known as the "Black" and "White" Yajur-Veda. The origin and meaning of these designations are not very clear. The White Yajur-Veda contains only the verses and sayings necessary for the sacrifice, while explanations exist in a separate Brahmana work. It differs widely from the Black Yajurveda, which incorporates such explanations in the work itself, often immediately following the verses. Of the Black Yajurveda four major recensions survive, all showing by and large the same arrangement, but differing in many other respects, notably in the individual discussion of the rituals but also in matters of phonology and accent. | |||
] notes that the Rigveda, and Sayana's commentary, contain passages criticizing as fruitless mere recitation of the ''Ŗik'' (words) without understanding their inner meaning or essence, the knowledge of ''dharma'' and ''Parabrahman''.{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|pp=29–31}} Mukherjee concludes that in the Rigvedic education of the mantras "the contemplation and comprehension of ] was considered as more important and vital to education than their mere mechanical repetition and correct pronunciation."{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|pp=29, 34}} Mookei refers to Sayana as stating that "the mastery of texts, ''akshara-praptī'', is followed by '']-]'', perception of their meaning."{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=35}}{{refn|group=note|name="artha"|''Artha'' may also mean "goal, purpose or essence," depending on the context.<ref>See: | |||
=== The Sama-Veda === | |||
<br />{{*}} University of Kloen, Germany (2009) | |||
{{main|Samaveda}} | |||
<br />{{*}} Karl Potter (1998), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 4, {{ISBN|81-208-0310-8}}, Motilal Banarsidass, pp 610 (note 17)</ref>}} Mukherjee explains that the Vedic knowledge was first perceived by the ''rishis'' and ''munis''. Only the perfect language of the Vedas, as in contrast to ordinary speech, can reveal these truths, which were preserved by committing them to memory.{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|pp=34–35}} According to Mukherjee, while these truths are imparted to the student by the memorized texts,{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|pp=35–36}} "the realization of ]" and the knowledge of '']'' as revealed to the ''rishis'' is the real aim of Vedic learning, and not the mere recitation of texts.{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=36}} The supreme knowledge of the Absolute, '']-]'', the knowledge of '']'' and '']'', can be obtained by taking vows of silence and obedience{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=196}} sense-restraint, '']'', the practice of '']'' (austerities),{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=34}} and discussing the ].{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=196}}{{refn|group=note|Mookerji also refers to the Uśanā smriti (81-2), which "states that mastery of mere text of Veda is to be followed up by its meaning" by discussing the Vedanta.{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=196}} where-after they were able to engage in doscourses on the Vedas.{{sfn|Mookerji|2011|p=29}}{{sfn|Frazier|2011|p=34}}}} | |||
The ] (Sanskrit '''''{{IAST|sāmaveda}}''''' ) is the "Veda of chants" or "Knowledge of melodies". The name of this Veda is from the Sanskrit word '''''{{IAST|sāman}}''''' which means a metrical hymn or song of praise.<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=981}}.</ref> It consists of 1549 stanzas, taken entirely (except 78) from the Rig-Veda.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=51}}.</ref> Some of the Rig-Veda verses are repeated more than once. Including repetitions, there are a total of 1875 verses numbered in the Sama-Veda recension published by Griffith.<ref>For 1875 total verses, see numbering given in Ralph T. H. Griffith edition. Griffith's introduction mentions the recension history for his text. Repetitions may be found by consulting the cross-index in Griffith pp. 491-99.</ref> Two major recensions remain today, the Kauthuma/Ranayaniya and the Jaiminiya. | |||
==Vedic schools or recensions== | |||
Its purpose was liturgical and practical, to serve as a songbook for the "singer" priests who took part in the liturgy. A priest who sings hymns from the Sama-Veda during a ritual is called an ''{{IAST|udgātṛ}}'', a word derived from the Sanskrit root ''ud-gai'' ("to sing" or "to chant").<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=271}}.</ref> A similar word in English might be "cantor". The styles of chanting are important to the liturgical use of the verses. The hymns were to be sung according to certain fixed melodies; hence the name of the collection. | |||
{{Main article|Shakha}} | |||
The four Vedas were transmitted in various ]s (branches, schools).<ref name="Flood 1996 39">{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=39}}.</ref><ref name=witzelthreefour/> Each school likely represented an ancient community of a particular area, or kingdom.<ref name=witzelthreefour/> Each school followed its own canon. Multiple recensions (revisions) are known for each of the Vedas.<ref name="Flood 1996 39"/> Thus, states Witzel as well as Renou, in the 2nd millennium BCE, there was likely no canon of one broadly accepted Vedic texts, no Vedic “Scripture”, but only a canon of various texts accepted by each school. Some of these texts have survived, most lost or yet to be found. Rigveda that survives in modern times, for example, is in only one extremely well preserved school of Śåkalya, from a region called ], in modern north ], south of ].<ref name=jamisonwitzelvedic>Jamison and Witzel (1992), , Harvard University, p. 6</ref> The Vedic canon in its entirety consists of texts from all the various Vedic schools taken together.<ref name=witzelthreefour/> | |||
There were Vedic schools that believed in ] in which numerous gods had different natural functions, ] beliefs where only one god was worshipped but others were thought to exist, ] beliefs in a single ], ], and ] beliefs where "there is an absolute reality that goes beyond the gods and that includes or transcends everything that exists."<ref name=":102">{{Cite book |last=Stevenson |first=Jay |title=The Complete Idiot's Guide to Eastern Philosophy |publisher=] |year=2000 |isbn=9780028638201 |location=Indianapolis |pages=46 |language=en-US}}</ref> ], ], and ] were popular subjects of worship by polytheist organizations.<ref name=":102" /> | |||
=== The Atharva-Veda === | |||
{{main|Atharvaveda}} | |||
The ] is the "Knowledge of the (and Angirasa)". The ] or Atharvangirasa is the text 'belonging to the Atharvan and Angirasa' poets. | |||
Apte defines an ''atharvan'' as a priest who worshipped fire and Soma.<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=37}}.</ref> The etymology of Atharvan is unclear, but according to Mayrhofer it is related to Avesta athravan (āθrauuan); he denies any connection with fire priests.<ref>Mayrhofer, ] I.60</ref> Atharvan was an ancient term for a certain Rshi even in the Rigveda. (The older literature took them as priests who worshipped fire). | |||
Each of the four Vedas were shared by the numerous schools, but revised, interpolated and adapted locally, in and after the Vedic period, giving rise to various recensions of the text. Some texts were revised into the modern era, raising significant debate on parts of the text which are believed to have been corrupted at a later date.<ref>J. Muir (1872), {{Google books|HRYAAAAAYAAJ|Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and History of the People of India, their religion and institutions, Vol. 1}}, 2nd Edition, p. 12</ref><ref>Albert Friedrich Weber, {{Google books|Bi8JAAAAQAAJ|Indische Studien, herausg. von}}, Vol. 10, pp. 1–9 with footnotes (in German); For a translation, {{Google books|HRYAAAAAYAAJ|Original Sanskrit Texts}}, p. 14</ref> The Vedas each have an Index or ], the principal work of this kind being the general Index or ''{{IAST|Sarvānukramaṇī}}''.<ref>For an example, see Univ of Pennsylvania rare texts collection</ref><ref>R̥gveda-sarvānukramaṇī Śaunakakr̥tāʼnuvākānukramaṇī ca, Maharṣi-Kātyayāna-viracitā, {{oclc|11549595}}</ref> | |||
The {{IAST|Atharva-Veda Saṃhitā}} has 760 hymns, and about one-sixth of the hymns are in common with the Rig-Veda.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=56}}.</ref> Most of the verses are metrical, but some sections are in prose.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=56}}.</ref> | |||
Prodigious energy was expended by ancient Indian culture in ensuring that these texts were transmitted from generation to generation with inordinate fidelity.<ref name=":1">{{Harvnb|Staal|1986}}</ref> For example, memorization of the sacred ''Vedas'' included up to eleven ] of the same text. The texts were subsequently "proof-read" by comparing the different recited versions. Forms of recitation included the ''{{IAST|jaṭā-pāṭha}}'' (literally "mesh recitation") in which every two adjacent words in the text were first recited in their original order, then repeated in the reverse order, and finally repeated in the original order.<ref name=filliozat-p139>{{Harvnb|Filliozat|2004|p=139}}</ref> That these methods have been effective, is attested to by the preservation of the most ancient Indian religious text, the '']'', as ] into a single text during the ''Brahmana'' period, without any variant readings within that school.<ref name=filliozat-p139/> | |||
It was compiled around 900 BCE, although some of its material may go back to the time of the Rig Veda,<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=37}}.</ref> and some parts of the Atharva-Veda are older than the Rig-Veda.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=56}}.</ref> | |||
The Vedas were orally transmitted by memorization, and were written down only after 500 BCE,{{sfn|Wood|2007}}<ref name="Witzel2003"/><ref name=":0"/> All printed editions of the Vedas that survive in the modern times are likely the version existing in about the 16th century CE.<ref>{{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|p=69}}, "... almost all printed editions depend on the late manuscripts that are hardly older than 500 years"</ref> | |||
The Atharvana-Veda is preserved in two recensions, the Paippalāda and Śaunaka.<ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=56}}.</ref> According to Apte it had nine schools ('']s'').<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=37}}.</ref> The Paippalada version is longer than the Saunaka one; it is only partially printed and remains untranslated. | |||
==Four Vedas== | |||
Unlike the other three Vedas, the Atharvana-Veda has less connection with sacrifice.<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=36}}.</ref><ref>Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}}", in: {{Harvnb|Flood|2003|p=76}}.</ref> Its first part consists chiefly of spells and incantations, concerned with protection against demons and disaster, spells for the healing of diseases, and for long life.<ref>{{Harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1957|p=3}}.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Michaels|2004|p=56}}.</ref> | |||
{{Vedas and Shakhas}} | |||
The canonical division of the Vedas is fourfold (''{{IAST|turīya}}'') viz.,<ref>{{Harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1957|p=3}}; {{Harvnb|Witzel|2003|p=68}}</ref> | |||
# ] (RV) | |||
# ] (YV, with the main division ] vs. ]) | |||
# ] (SV) | |||
# ] (AV) | |||
Of these, the first three were the principal original division, also called "''{{IAST|trayī vidyā}}''"; that is, "the triple science" of reciting hymns (Rigveda), performing sacrifices (Yajurveda), and chanting songs (Samaveda).<ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=257–348}}</ref>{{sfn|MacDonell|2004|pp=29–39}} The Rig Veda most likely was composed between {{circa}} 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE.{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} Witzel notes that it is the Vedic period itself, where incipient lists divide the Vedic texts into three (trayī) or four branches: Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva.<ref name=witzelthreefour/> | |||
The second part of the text contains speculative and philosophical hymns. R. C. Zaehner notes that: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
"The latest of the four Vedas, the Atharva-Veda, is, as we have seen, largely composed of magical texts and charms, but here and there we find cosmological hymns which anticipate the Upanishads, -- hymns to Skambha, the 'Support', who is seen as the first principle which is both the material and efficient cause of the universe, to Prāna, the 'Breath of Life', to Vāc, the 'Word', and so on.<ref>{{Harvnb|Zaehner|1966|p=vii}}.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the ]s (mantras and benedictions), the ] (text on rituals, ceremonies such as newborn baby's rites of passage, coming of age, marriages, retirement and cremation, sacrifices and symbolic sacrifices), the ] (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the ] (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).<ref name="gflood"/><ref name="A Bhattacharya 2006 pp. 8–14"/><ref name="Jan Gonda 1975"/> The ]s (short ritual worship-related sections) are considered by some scholars{{sfn|Bhattacharya|2006|pp=8–14}}{{sfn|Holdrege|1995|pp=351–357}} as the fifth part. ] notes that the rituals, rites and ceremonies described in these ancient texts reconstruct to a large degree the Indo-European marriage rituals observed in a region spanning the Indian subcontinent, Persia and the European area, and some greater details are found in the Vedic era texts such as the Grhya Sūtras.<ref>Jamison and Witzel (1992), , Harvard University, p. 21</ref> | |||
In its third section, the Atharvaveda contains Mantras used in marriage and death rituals, as well as those for kingship, female rivals and the Vratya (in Brahmana style prose). | |||
Only one version of the Rigveda is known to have survived into the modern era.<ref name=jamisonwitzelvedic/> Several different versions of the Sama Veda and the Atharva Veda are known, and many different versions of the Yajur Veda have been found in different parts of South Asia.<ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|p=286}}</ref> | |||
Gavin Flood discusses the relatively late acceptance of the Atharva-Veda as follows: | |||
The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox ''sramana''-traditions.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=82}} | |||
<blockquote> | |||
"There were originally only three priests associated with the first three {{IAST|Saṃhitās}}, for the Brahman as overseer of the rites does not appear in the ''{{IAST|Ṛg Veda}}'' and is only incorporated later, thereby showing the acceptance of the ''Atharva Veda'', which had been somewhat distinct from the other {{IAST|Saṃhitās}} and identified with the lower social strata, as being of equal standing with the other texts."<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=42}}.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
===Rigveda=== | |||
{{Main article|Rigveda}} | |||
{{Quote box |width=26em | bgcolor=#FFE0BB |align=right |salign = right | |||
|quote=] (Hymn of non-Eternity): | |||
Who really knows?<br /> | |||
==Brahmanas== | |||
Who can here proclaim it?<br /> | |||
{{see|Brahmanas}} | |||
Whence, whence this creation sprang?<br /> | |||
The mystical notions surrounding the concept of "Veda" that would flower in ] philosophy have their roots already in ] literature, notably in the ]. | |||
Gods came later, after the creation of this universe. | |||
The Vedas are identified with ], the universal principle (ŚBM 10.1.1.8, 10.2.4.6). ] "speech" is called the "mother of the Vedas" (ŚBM 6.5.3.4, 10.5.5.1). The knowledge of the Vedas is endless, compared to them, human knowledge is like mere handfuls of dirt (] 3.10.11.3-5). The universe itself was originally encapsulated in the three Vedas (ŚBM 10.4.2.22 has ] reflecting that "truly, all beings are in the triple Veda"). | |||
<!--sa aikṣata prajāpatiḥ trayyāṃ vāva vidyāyāṃ sarvāṇi bhūtāni hanta trayomeva | |||
vidyāmātmānamabhisaṃskaravā iti--> | |||
Who then knows whence it has arisen?<br /> | |||
==Vedanta== | |||
Whether God's will created it, or whether He was mute;<br /> | |||
{{see|Vedanta|Upanishads|Aranyakas}} | |||
Only He who is its overseer in highest heaven knows,<br /> | |||
While contemporary traditions continued to maintain Vedic ritualism (], ]), ] renounced all ritualism and radically re-interpreted the notion of "Veda" in purely mysticist terms. | |||
He only knows, or perhaps He does not know. | |||
The association of the three Vedas with the ''bhūr bhuvaḥ svaḥ'' mantra is found in the ]: "''Bhūḥ'' is the Rigveda, ''bhuvaḥ'' is the Yajurveda, ''svaḥ'' is the Samaveda" (1.3.2). The Upanishads reduce the "essence of the Vedas" further, to the syllable ] ({{Unicode|ॐ}}). Thus, the ] has: | |||
|source =—] 10.129.6–7<ref name=nasadiyasukta> | |||
:"The goal, which all Vedas declare, which all austerities aim at, and which humans desire when they live a life of continence, I will tell you briefly it is ''Aum''" (1.2.15)<!-- | |||
Original Sanskrit: Wikisource; | |||
:''{{IAST|sarve vedā yat padam āmananti / tapām̐si sarvāṇi ca yad vadanti / yad icchanto brahmacaryaṃ caranti / tat te padaṃ saṃgraheṇa bravīmy / om ity etat}} //''--> | |||
<br />{{*}}Translation 1: {{cite book|author=Max Müller|title=A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature|date=1859|publisher=Williams and Norgate, London|url=https://archive.org/stream/historyofancient00mluoft#page/564/mode/2up|pages=559–565|author-link=Max Müller}} | |||
<br />{{*}}Translation 2: {{cite book|author=Kenneth Kramer|title=World Scriptures: An Introduction to Comparative Religions|date=1986|publisher=Paulist Press|isbn=978-0-8091-2781-8|page=21}} | |||
<br />{{*}}Translation 3: {{cite book|author=David Christian|title=Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History|url=https://archive.org/details/mapstimeintroduc00chri_515|url-access=limited|date=2011|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-95067-2|pages=–18}}</ref>}} | |||
The ] is the oldest extant ] text.<ref>see e.g. {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> It is a collection of 1,028 ] ]s and 10,600 verses in all, organized into ten books (Sanskrit: ''mandalas'').<ref>For 1,028 hymns and 10,600 verses and division into ten mandalas, see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> The hymns are dedicated to ].<ref>For characterization of content and mentions of deities including Agni, Indra, Varuna, Soma, Surya, etc. see: {{Harvnb|Avari|2007|p=77}}.</ref> | |||
The books were composed by poets from different priestly groups over a period of several centuries between {{circa}} 1500 and 1200 BCE,{{refn|group=note|name="dating"}} (the early ]) in the ] (]) region of the northwest ]. According to Michael Witzel, the initial codification of the ''Rigveda'' took place at the end of the Rigvedic period at {{Circa|1200 BCE}}, in the early ] kingdom.{{sfn|Witzel|1997|p=261}} | |||
==The Vedas in post-Vedic literature== | |||
=== Vedanga === | |||
{{main|Vedanga}} | |||
Six technical subjects related to the Vedas are traditionally known as ''{{IAST|vedāṅga}}'' "limbs of the Veda". V. S. Apte defines this group of works as: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
"N. of a certain class of works regarded as auxiliary to the Vedas and designed to aid in the correct pronunciation and interpretation of the text and the right employment of the ''Mantras'' in ceremonials."<ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=387}}.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
The Rigveda is structured based on clear principles. The Veda begins with a small book addressed to Agni, Indra, ] and other gods, all arranged according to decreasing total number of hymns in each deity collection; for each deity series, the hymns progress from longer to shorter ones, but the number of hymns per book increases. Finally, the meter too is systematically arranged from jagati and tristubh to anustubh and gayatri as the text progresses.<ref name=witzelthreefour>Witzel, M., "", Harvard University, in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=261–264}}</ref> | |||
These subjects are treated in ] literature dating from the end of the Vedic period to ] times, seeing the transition from late ] to ]. | |||
The rituals became increasingly complex over time, and the king's association with them strengthened both the position of the Brahmans and the kings.{{sfn|Prasad|2020|pp=150–151}} The ] rituals, performed with the coronation of a king, "set in motion cyclical regenerations of the universe."{{sfn|Prasad|2020|p=151}} In terms of substance, the nature of hymns shift from praise of deities in early books to ] with questions such as, "what is the origin of the universe?, do even gods know the answer?",<ref name=nasadiyasukta/> the virtue of ] (charity) in society,<ref>Original text translated in English: ], Mandala 10, Hymn 117, Ralph T.H. Griffith (Translator);<br />C Chatterjee (1995), , Journal of Human Values, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–12</ref> and other metaphysical issues in its hymns.{{refn|group=note|For example,<br />''Hymn 1.164.34'', "What is the ultimate limit of the earth?", "What is the center of the universe?", "What is the semen of the cosmic horse?", "What is the ultimate source of human speech?"<br />''Hymn 1.164.34'', "Who gave blood, soul, spirit to the earth?", "How could the unstructured universe give origin to this structured world?"<br />''Hymn 1.164.5'', "Where does the sun hide in the night?", "Where do gods live?"<br />''Hymn 1.164.6'', "What, where is the unborn support for the born universe?";<br />''Hymn 1.164.20'' (a hymn that is widely cited in the Upanishads as the parable of the Body and the Soul): "Two birds with fair wings, inseparable companions; Have found refuge in the same sheltering tree. One incessantly eats from the fig tree; the other, not eating, just looks on.";<br />Sources: (a) Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, {{ISBN|978-0-595-26925-9}}, pp. 64–69;<br />], A History of Indian Literature: Veda and Upanishads, Volume 1, Part 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-01603-2}}, pp. 134–135;<br />] Wikisource}} | |||
The six subjects of Vedanga are: | |||
* Phonetics (]) | |||
There are similarities between the mythology, rituals and linguistics in Rigveda and those found in ancient central Asia, Iranian and Hindukush (Afghanistan) regions.<ref>Michael Witzel, , in The Vedas – Texts, Language and Ritual, Editors: Griffiths and Houben (2004), Brill Academic, {{ISBN|978-90-6980-149-0}}, pp. 581–627</ref> | |||
* Meter (]) | |||
* Grammar (]) | |||
===Samaveda=== | |||
* Etymology (]) | |||
{{Main article|Samaveda}} | |||
* Astronomy (]) | |||
The ]<ref>From {{IAST|sāman}}, the term for a melody applied to a metrical hymn or a song of praise, {{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=981}}.</ref> consists of 1549 stanzas, taken almost entirely (except for 75 mantras) from the Rigveda.<ref name="Michaels 2004 51"/><ref name=witzelsamaveda>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=269–270}}</ref> While its earliest parts are believed to date from as early as the Rigvedic period, the existing compilation dates from the post-Rigvedic Mantra period of ], between {{circa|1200}} and 1000 BCE or "slightly later", roughly contemporary with the ] and the ].<ref name=witzelsamaveda/> | |||
* Ritual (]) | |||
The Samaveda samhita has two major parts. The first part includes four melody collections (gāna, गान) and the second part three verse “books” (ārcika, आर्चिक).<ref name=witzelsamaveda/> A melody in the song books corresponds to a verse in the ''arcika'' books. Just as in the Rigveda, the early sections of Samaveda typically begin with hymns to Agni and Indra but shift to the abstract. Their meters shift also in a descending order. The songs in the later sections of the Samaveda have the least deviation from the hymns derived from the Rigveda.<ref name=witzelsamaveda/> | |||
In the Samaveda, some of the Rigvedic verses are repeated.<ref>M Bloomfield, {{Google books|DigYAAAAYAAJ|Rig-veda Repetitions|page=402}}, pp. 402–464</ref> Including repetitions, there are a total of 1875 verses numbered in the Samaveda recension translated by Griffith.<ref>For 1875 total verses, see the numbering given in Ralph T. H. Griffith. Griffith's introduction mentions the recension history for his text. Repetitions may be found by consulting the cross-index in Griffith pp. 491–499.</ref> Two major recensions have survived, the Kauthuma/Ranayaniya and the Jaiminiya. Its purpose was liturgical, and they were the repertoire of the ] or "singer" priests.{{sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|p=381}} | |||
===Yajurveda=== | |||
{{Main article|Yajurveda}} | |||
The ] consists of prose mantras.{{sfn|Witzel|2003|pp=76–77}} It is a compilation of ritual offering formulas that were said by a priest while an individual performed ritual actions such as those before the ] fire.{{sfn|Witzel|2003|pp=76–77}} The core text of the Yajurveda falls within the classical Mantra period of ] at the end of the 2nd millennium BCE – younger than the ], and roughly contemporary with the ], the Rigvedic ], and the ].<ref>, Michael Witzel, Harvard University</ref> Witzel dates the Yajurveda ] to the early Indian ], after c. 1200 and before 800 BCE.<ref> Michael Witzel, Harvard University</ref> corresponding to the early ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220153727/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0104/ejvs0104article.pdf |date=20 February 2012 }}, Michael Witzel, Harvard University</ref> | |||
] | |||
The earliest and most ancient layer of Yajurveda ] includes about 1,875 verses, that are distinct yet borrow and build upon the foundation of verses in ].<ref>Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, {{ISBN|978-0-595-26925-9}}, pp. 273–274</ref> Unlike the Samaveda which is almost entirely based on Rigveda mantras and structured as songs, the Yajurveda samhitas are in prose, and they are different from earlier Vedic texts linguistically.<ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=270–271}}</ref> The Yajur Veda has been the primary source of information about sacrifices during Vedic times and associated rituals.<ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=272–274}}</ref> | |||
There are two major groups of texts in this Veda: the "Black" (''Krishna'') and the "White" (''Shukla''). The term "black" implies "the un-arranged, motley collection" of verses in Yajurveda, in contrast to the "white" (well arranged) Yajurveda.<ref name=pauldeussen217>], Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1468-4}}, pp. 217–219</ref> The White Yajurveda separates the Samhita from its Brahmana (the ]), the Black Yajurveda intersperses the Samhita with Brahmana commentary. Of the Black Yajurveda, texts from four major schools have survived (Maitrayani, Katha, Kapisthala-Katha, Taittiriya), while of the White Yajurveda, two (Kanva and Madhyandina).{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=52 Table 3}}<ref name=prabhakar>CL Prabhakar (1972), The Recensions of the Sukla Yajurveda, Archiv Orientální, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp. 347–353</ref> The youngest layer of Yajurveda text is not related to rituals nor sacrifice, it includes the largest collection of primary Upanishads, influential to various schools of ].<ref name="The Philosophy of the Upanishads">], , Motilal Banarsidass (2011 Edition), {{ISBN|978-81-208-1620-6}}, p. 23</ref><ref name="Patrick Olivelle 1998 pp. 1–17">Patrick Olivelle (1998), Upaniṣhads, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|0-19-282292-6}}, pp. 1–17</ref> | |||
===Atharvaveda=== | |||
{{Main article|Atharvaveda}} | |||
The ] is the text 'belonging to the ] and ] poets. It has about 760 hymns, and about 160 of the hymns are in common with the Rigveda.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=56}} Most of the verses are metrical, but some sections are in prose.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=56}} Two different versions of the text – the {{IAST|Paippalāda}} and the {{IAST|Śaunakīya}} – have survived into the modern times.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=56}}<ref name=fritsstaal136>Frits Staal (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, {{ISBN|978-0-14-309986-4}}, pp. 136–137</ref> The Atharvaveda was not considered as a Veda in the Vedic era, and was accepted as a Veda in late 1st millennium BCE.<ref>] (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, {{ISBN|978-0-14-309986-4}}, p. 135</ref><ref>Alex Wayman (1997), Untying the Knots in Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1321-2}}, pp. 52–53</ref> It was compiled last,<ref name=zaehnerlastav>"The latest of the four Vedas, the Atharva-Veda, is, as we have seen, largely composed of magical texts and charms, but here and there we find cosmological hymns which anticipate the Upanishads, – hymns to Skambha, the 'Support', who is seen as the first principle which is both the material and efficient cause of the universe, to Prāna, the 'Breath of Life', to Vāc, the 'Word', and so on." {{Harvnb|Zaehner|1966|p=vii}}.</ref> probably around 900 BCE, although some of its material may go back to the time of the Rigveda,{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}} or earlier.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=56}} | |||
The Atharvaveda is sometimes called the "Veda of magical formulas",<ref name=lauriepatton38>Laurie Patton (2004), Veda and Upanishad, in ''The Hindu World'' (Editors: Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby), Routledge, {{ISBN|0-415-21527-7}}, p. 38</ref> an epithet declared to be incorrect by other scholars.<ref name=jangonda277>] (1975), Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas, Vol 1, Fasc. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-01603-2}}, pp. 277–280, Quote: "It would be incorrect to describe the Atharvaveda Samhita as a collection of magical formulas".</ref> The ] layer of the text likely represents a developing 2nd millennium BCE tradition of ] rites to address superstitious anxiety, spells to remove maladies believed to be caused by demons, and herbs- and nature-derived potions as medicine.<ref>Kenneth Zysk (2012), Understanding Mantras (Editor: Harvey Alper), Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-0746-4}}, pp. 123–129</ref><ref>On magic spells and charms, such as those to gain better health: Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; see also chapters 3.11, 3.31, 4.10, 5.30, 19.26;<br /> On finding a good husband: Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; Atharvaveda dedicates over 30 chapters to love relationships, sexuality and for conceiving a child, see e.g. chapters 1.14, 2.30, 3.25, 6.60, 6.78, 6.82, 6.130–6.132; On peaceful social and family relationships: Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press;</ref> The text, states Kenneth Zysk, is one of oldest surviving record of the evolutionary practices in religious medicine and reveals the "earliest forms of folk healing of Indo-European antiquity".<ref>Kenneth Zysk (1993), Religious Medicine: The History and Evolution of Indian Medicine, Routledge, {{ISBN|978-1-56000-076-1}}, pp. x–xii</ref> Many books of the Atharvaveda Samhita are dedicated to rituals without magic, such as to philosophical speculations and to ].<ref name=jangonda277/> | |||
The Atharva veda has been a primary source for information about Vedic culture, the customs and beliefs, the aspirations and frustrations of everyday Vedic life, as well as those associated with kings and governance. The text also includes hymns dealing with the two major rituals of passage – ] and ]. The Atharva Veda also dedicates significant portion of the text asking the meaning of a ritual.<ref>Witzel, M., "" in {{Harvnb|Witzel|1997|pp=275–276}}</ref> | |||
===Embedded Vedic texts=== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| width = 275 | |||
| footer = Manuscripts of the Vedas are in the Sanskrit language, but in many regional scripts in addition to the ]. Top: ] (Tamil Nadu), Below: ] (Kerala). | |||
| image1 = Vedas palm leaf manuscript, Tamil Grantha Script, Sanskrit, Tamil Nadu.jpg | |||
| image2 = 16th century Vedas palm leaf manuscript, Malayalam Script, Sanskrit, Kerala.jpg | |||
}} | |||
====Brahmanas==== | |||
{{Further|Brahmana}} | |||
The Brahmanas are commentaries, explanation of proper methods and meaning of Vedic Samhita rituals in the four Vedas.{{sfn|Klostermaier|1994|pp=67–69}} They also incorporate myths, legends and in some cases philosophy.{{sfn|Klostermaier|1994|pp=67–69}}<ref name=ebri> Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)</ref> Each regional Vedic '']'' (school) has its own operating manual-like Brahmana text, most of which have been lost.<ref name=winter>Moriz Winternitz (2010), A History of Indian Literature, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-0264-3}}, pp. 175–176</ref> A total of 19 Brahmana texts have survived into modern times: two associated with the ], six with the ], ten with the ] and one with the ]. The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the ]), were complete by about 700 BCE.<ref name=mw/><ref name=bcp/> According to ], the final codification of the Brahmanas took place in pre-Buddhist times (ca. 600 BCE).{{sfn|Klostermaier|1994|p=67}} | |||
The substance of the Brahmana text varies with each Veda. For example, the first chapter of the Chandogya Brahmana, one of the oldest Brahmanas, includes eight ritual ''suktas'' (hymns) for the ceremony of marriage and rituals at the birth of a child.<ref name=maxmullercb/><ref name=pauldeussencb>Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1468-4}}, p. 63</ref> The first hymn is a recitation that accompanies offering a ] oblation to ''Agni'' (fire) on the occasion of a marriage, and the hymn prays for prosperity of the couple getting married.<ref name=maxmullercb>Max Müller, , The Upanishads, Part I, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvii with footnote 2</ref><ref>{{Google books|sqqgAAAAMAAJ|The Development of the Female Mind in India|page=27}}, The Calcutta Review, Volume 60, p. 27</ref> The second hymn wishes for their long life, kind relatives, and a numerous progeny.<ref name=maxmullercb/> The third hymn is a mutual marriage pledge, between the bride and groom, by which the two bind themselves to each other. The sixth through last hymns of the first chapter in Chandogya Brahmana are ritual celebrations on the birth of a child and wishes for health, wealth, and prosperity with a profusion of cows and ].<ref name=maxmullercb/> However, these verses are incomplete expositions, and their complete context emerges only with the Samhita layer of text.<ref>Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-01603-2}}, pp. 319–322, 368–383 with footnotes</ref> | |||
====Aranyakas and Upanishads==== | |||
{{Further|Vedanta|Upanishads|Aranyaka}} | |||
The Aranyakas layer of the Vedas include rituals, discussion of symbolic meta-rituals, as well as philosophical speculations.{{sfn|Holdrege|1995|pp=351–357}}<ref name=jago>] (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-01603-2}}, pp. 424–426</ref> | |||
''Aranyakas'', however, neither are homogeneous in content nor in structure.<ref name=jago/> They are a medley of instructions and ideas, and some include chapters of Upanishads within them. Two theories have been proposed on the origin of the word ''Aranyakas''. One theory holds that these texts were meant to be studied in a forest, while the other holds that the name came from these being the manuals of allegorical interpretation of sacrifices, for those in ] (retired, forest-dwelling) stage of their life, according to the historic age-based ] system of human life.<ref>AB Keith (2007), The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-0644-3}}, pp. 489–490</ref> | |||
The Upanishads reflect the last composed layer of texts in the Vedas. They are commonly referred to as '']'', variously interpreted to mean either the "last chapters, parts of the Vedas" or "the object, the highest purpose of the Veda".<ref>Max Müller, , Part 1, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvi footnote 1</ref> | |||
The central concern of the Upanishads are the connections "between parts of the human organism and cosmic realities."{{sfn|Olivelle|1998|p=liii}} The Upanishads intend to create a hierarchy of connected and dependent realities, evoking a sense of unity of "the separate elements of the world and of human experience them into a single form."{{sfn|Olivelle|1998|p=lv}} The concepts of ], the Ultimate Reality from which everything arises, and ], the essence of the individual, are central ideas in the ]s,{{sfn|Mahadevan|1952|p=59}}<ref name=ptraju>PT Raju (1985), Structural Depths of Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0-88706-139-4}}, pp. 35–36</ref> and knowing the correspondence between Ātman and Brahman as "the fundamental principle which shapes the world" permits the creation of an integrative vision of the whole.{{sfn|Olivelle|1998|p=lv}}<ref name=ptraju/> The Upanishads are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions,<ref name=wendydoniger/><ref>Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al), State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7914-1080-6}}, p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";<br />Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, {{ISBN|978-1-59257-846-7}}, pp. 208–210</ref> and of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads have influenced the diverse traditions of Hinduism.<ref name="wendydoniger"/><ref>Patrick Olivelle (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-535242-9}}, p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth , in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".</ref> | |||
''Aranyakas'' are sometimes identified as ''karma-kanda'' (ritualistic section), while the Upanishads are identified as ''jnana-kanda'' (spirituality section).{{sfn|Holdrege|1996|p=30}}{{sfn|Nakamura|1983|p=409}}{{sfn|Bhattacharya|2006|p=9}}{{refn|group=note|name="Roer"}} In an alternate classification, the early part of Vedas are called ]s and the commentary are called the ]s which together are identified as the ceremonial ''karma-kanda'', while ''Aranyakas'' and ''Upanishads'' are referred to as the ''jnana-kanda''.{{sfn|Knapp|2005|pp=10–11}} | |||
==Post-Vedic literature== | |||
===Vedanga=== | |||
{{Main article|Vedanga}} | |||
The Vedangas developed towards the end of the vedic period, around or after the middle of the 1st millennium BCE. These auxiliary fields of Vedic studies emerged because the language of the Vedas,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mid-day.com/news/opinion/article/sound-and-meaning-of-veda-23245229|title=Sound and meaning of Veda|date=11 September 2022 }}</ref> composed centuries earlier, became too archaic to the people of that time.{{Sfn|Olivelle|1999|p=xxiii}} The Vedangas were sciences that focused on helping understand and interpret the Vedas that had been composed many centuries earlier.{{Sfn|Olivelle|1999|p=xxiii}} | |||
The six subjects of Vedanga are phonetics (]), poetic meter (]), grammar (]), etymology and linguistics (]), rituals and rites of passage (]), time keeping and astronomy (]).<ref name=jameslochtefeldvedanga>James Lochtefeld (2002), "Vedanga" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing, {{ISBN|0-8239-2287-1}}, pp. 744–745</ref>{{Sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|pp=391–394 with footnotes, 416–419}}{{Sfn|Coward|Raja|Potter|1990|pp=105–110}} | |||
Vedangas developed as ancillary studies for the Vedas, but its insights into meters, structure of sound and language, grammar, linguistic analysis and other subjects influenced post-Vedic studies, arts, culture and various schools of ].<ref>{{cite EB1911|wstitle= Hinduism |volume= 13 | pages = 501–513; see page 505 |last1= Eggeling |first1= Hans Julius }}</ref>{{Sfn|Wilke|Moebus|2011|pp=472–532}}{{Sfn|Coward|Raja|Potter|1990|p=18}} The Kalpa Vedanga studies, for example, gave rise to the Dharma-sutras, which later expanded into Dharma-shastras.{{Sfn|Olivelle|1999|p=xxiii}}<ref>{{cite book |author=Rajendra Prasad |title=A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1gtxVmUr1ygC |year=2009|publisher=Concept |isbn=978-81-8069-595-7 |page=147 }}</ref> | |||
===Parisista=== | |||
{{Main article|Pariśiṣṭa}} | |||
''{{IAST|Pariśiṣṭa}}'' "supplement, appendix" is the term applied to various ancillary works of Vedic literature, dealing mainly with details of ritual and elaborations of the texts logically and chronologically prior to them: the ]s, ]s, ]s and ]. Naturally classified with the Veda to which each pertains, Parisista works exist for each of the four Vedas. However, only the literature associated with the ] is extensive. | |||
* The ''{{IAST|Āśvalāyana Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa}}'' is a very late text associated with the ] canon. | |||
* The ''{{IAST|Gobhila Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa}}'' is a short metrical text of two chapters, with 113 and 95 verses respectively. | |||
* The ''{{IAST|Kātiya Pariśiṣṭas}}'', ascribed to ], consist of 18 works enumerated self-referentially in the fifth of the series (the ]) and the ''{{IAST|Kātyāyana Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa}}''. | |||
* The ''{{IAST|Kṛṣṇa}} ] has 3 parisistas The ''{{IAST|Āpastamba Hautra Pariśiṣṭa}}'', which is also found as the second ''praśna'' of the ''{{IAST|Satyasāḍha Śrauta Sūtra}}', the ''{{IAST|Vārāha Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa}}'' | |||
* For the Atharvaveda, there are 79 works, collected as 72 distinctly named parisistas.<ref>BR Modak, The Ancillary Literature of the Atharva-Veda, New Delhi, Rashtriya Veda Vidya Pratishthan, 1993, {{ISBN|81-215-0607-7}}</ref> | |||
===Upaveda<!--'Upaveda' redirects here-->=== | |||
The term '''upaveda'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA--> ("applied knowledge") is used in traditional literature to designate the subjects of certain technical works.{{sfn|Monier-Williams|1899|p=}}{{sfn|Apte|1965|p=293}} Lists of what subjects are included in this class differ among sources. | |||
The ] mentions four Upavedas:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803114818711|title=Upaveda |publisher=]|access-date=7 December 2014}}</ref> | |||
* ] (]), associated with the Yajurveda | |||
* Architecture (]), associated with the Rigveda. | |||
* Music and ] ({{IAST|]}}), associated with the Samaveda | |||
* Medicine (]), associated with the Atharvaveda.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Narayanaswamy |first1=V. |title=Origin and Development of Ayurveda: A Brief History |journal=Ancient Science of Life |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |date=1981|pmc=3336651 |pmid=22556454 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Frawley|first1=David|last2=Ranade|first2=Subhash|title=Ayurveda, Nature's Medicine|date=2001|publisher=Lotus Press|page=11 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aTIVnugZofsC|access-date=6 January 2015|isbn=978-0-914955-95-5}}</ref> | |||
==="Fifth" and other Vedas=== | |||
Some post-Vedic texts, including the ], the ]<ref>Paul Kuritz (1988), The Making of Theatre History, Prentice Hall, {{ISBN|978-0-13-547861-5}}, p. 68</ref> and certain ], refer to themselves as the "]".{{sfn|Sullivan|1994|p=385}} The earliest reference to such a "fifth Veda" is found in the ] in hymn 7.1.2.<ref>Sanskrit original: , Wikisource;<br />{{*}}English translation: , G Jha (Translator), Oriental Book Agency, p. 368</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote| | |||
Let drama and dance (Nātya, नाट्य) be the fifth vedic scripture. Combined with an epic story, tending to virtue, wealth, joy and spiritual freedom, it must contain the significance of every scripture, and forward every art. Thus, from all the Vedas, ] framed the Nātya Veda. From the Rig Veda he drew forth the words, from the Sama Veda the melody, from the Yajur Veda gesture, and from the Atharva Veda the sentiment. | |||
|First chapter of ''Nātyaśāstra''|Abhinaya Darpana <ref>{{Cite web|title=Natyashastra|publisher = Sanskrit Documents| url=http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/natya01.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Mirror of Gesture|author=Coormaraswamy and Duggirala|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=1917|pages=2–4|url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924012568535#page/n5/mode/2up}}</ref>}} | |||
"]", for example Tiruvaymoli, is a term for canonical ] texts considered as Vernacular Veda by some South Indian Hindus.<ref name="John Carman 1989 pp. 259–261"/><ref name="Vasudha Narayanan 1994 pp. 43, 117">Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, {{ISBN|978-0-87249-965-2}}, pp. 43, 117–119</ref> | |||
Other texts such as the ] or the ] are considered ''shruti'' or "Vedic" by some ] but not universally within Hinduism. The ], and ] in particular extended the term ''veda'' to include the ] and Vaishnavite devotional texts such as the ].<ref>{{Citation | |||
| first = Satsvarupa | |||
| last = Goswami | |||
| author-link = Satsvarupa dasa Goswami | |||
| title =Readings in Vedic Literature: The Tradition Speaks for Itself | |||
| publisher =Assoc Publishing Group | |||
| year = 1976 | |||
| page = 240 | |||
| isbn = 978-0-912776-88-0 | |||
| location = S.l.}}</ref> | |||
===Puranas=== | ===Puranas=== | ||
{{main article|Puranas}} | |||
A traditional view given in the ] (likely dating to the ]<ref>{{Harvnb|Flood|1996|p=111}} dates it to the 4th century CE.</ref>) attributes the current arrangement of four Vedas to the mythical sage ].<ref>Vishnu Purana, translation by Horace Hayman Wilson, 1840, Ch IV, http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/vp/vp078.htm</ref>. Puranic tradition also postulates a single original Veda that, in varying accounts, was divided into three or four parts. According to the ] (3.2.18, 3.3.4 etc) the original Veda was divided into four parts, and further fragmented into numerous shakhas, by ] in the form of ], in the ]; the ] (section 60) recounts a similar division by Vyasa, at the urging of ]. The ] (12.6.37) traces the origin of the primeval Veda to the syllable ], and says that it was divided into four at the start of ''Dvapara Yuga'', because men had declined in age, virtue and understanding. In a differing account Bhagavata Purana (9.14.43) attributes the division of the primeval veda (''aum'') into three parts to the monarch ] at the beginning of ]. The Mahabharata (santiparva 13,088) also mentions the division of the Veda into three in ''Treta Yuga''.<ref>{{harvnb|Muir|1861|pp=20-31}}</ref> | |||
The ''Puranas'' is a vast genre of encyclopedic Indian literature about a wide range of topics particularly myths, legends and other traditional lore.<ref name=oliverleaman437>Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0-415-17281-3}}, pp. 437–439</ref> Several of these texts are named after major ] deities such as Vishnu, Shiva and Devi.<ref name=ludorocher>Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-02522-5}}, pp. 1–5, 12–21</ref><ref name="Nair 2008 266">{{cite book|last=Nair|first=Shantha N.|title=Echoes of Ancient Indian Wisdom: The Universal Hindu Vision and Its Edifice|year=2008|publisher=Hindology Books|isbn=978-81-223-1020-7|page=266|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ekehXVP3W8wC&pg=PA266}}</ref> There are 18 ''Maha Puranas'' (Great Puranas) and 18 ''Upa Puranas'' (Minor Puranas), with over 400,000 verses.<ref name=oliverleaman437/> | |||
The Puranas have been influential in the ] culture.<ref>Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-447-02522-5}}, pp. 12–13, 134–156, 203–210</ref><ref name=gregbailey442>Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0-415-17281-3}}, pp. 442–443</ref> They are considered ''Vaidika'' (congruent with Vedic literature).<ref>Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, {{ISBN|978-0-520-20778-3}}, p. xxxix</ref> The ] has been among the most celebrated and popular text in the Puranic genre, and is of ] tenor.<ref name=richardthompson>{{cite book|last=Thompson|first=Richard L.|title=The Cosmology of the Bhagavata Purana 'Mysteries of the Sacred Universe|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3TZmDSr-1msC&pg=PA10|year=2007|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publishers|isbn=978-81-208-1919-1|page=10}}</ref><ref>Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, {{ISBN|978-0-520-20778-3}}, p. xli</ref> The Puranic literature wove with the ] in India, and both ] and ] scholars have commented on the underlying Vedanta themes in the ''Maha Puranas''.<ref>BN Krishnamurti Sharma (2008), A History of the Dvaita School of Vedānta and Its Literature, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1575-9}}, pp. 128–131</ref> | |||
===Other "Vedas"=== | |||
The term '''upaveda''' ("secondary knowledge") is used in traditional literature to designate the subjects of certain technical works.<ref>{{Harvnb|Monier-Williams|2006|p=207}}. Accessed 5 April 2007.</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Apte|1965|p=293}}.</ref> They have no relation to the Vedas, except as subjects worthy of study despite their secular character. Lists of what subjects are included in this class differ among sources. | |||
The ] mentions four Upavedas: | |||
==Vedas in Sangam literature== | |||
* Medicine (]), associated with the Rigveda | |||
* Archery (]), associated with the Yajurveda | |||
* Music and ] ({{IAST|]}}), associated with the Samaveda | |||
* Military science (]), associated with the Atharvaveda | |||
Vedas finds its earliest literary mention in the Sangam literature dated to the 5th century BCE. The Vedas were read by almost every caste in ancient ]. An Indian ], ] and ] named ] mentions that Tamil Nadu was a land of Vedas and a place where everyone knew the Vedas.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/Vedic-route-to-the-past/article14397101.ece|title=Vedic route to the past|date=18 October 2016|website=The Hindu |first=Pradeep |last= Chakravarty}}</ref> The Vedas are also considered as a text filled with deep meaning which can be understood only by scholars.<ref name=kz49>{{cite book|author=Kamil Zvelebil|title=Tamil Literature|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OQ33i496MsIC&pg=PA48 |year=1974| publisher =Otto Harrassowitz Verlag|isbn=978-3-447-01582-0|page=49}}</ref> The ] mentions that the ancestors of Velir kings where born from the ] of a Northern sage<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sangamtranslationsbyvaidehi.com/ettuthokai-purananuru-201-400/|title=Ettuthokai – Puranānūru 201-400|date=14 December 2014}}</ref> and the ] mentions that the four Vedas were chanted by the priests of Ancient Tamilakam,{{sfn|JV Chelliah|1946|p=41}} this shows chanting of Vedas and growing sacred fires are part of the Tamil culture. | |||
But ] and ] mention Ayurveda as an upaveda of the Atharvaveda. ] (architecture), ] (arts and crafts) are mentioned as fourth upaveda according to later sources. | |||
Vedas are called ''Maṛai'' or ''Vaymoli'' in parts of South India. Marai literally means "hidden, a secret, mystery". ] mentions a ''yupa'' post (a form of Vedic altar) in the ] village.{{sfn|JV Chelliah|1946|pp=98–99}} Vedas are recited by these Brahmins, and even their parrots are mentioned in the poem as those who sing the Vedic hymns. People in these Vedic villages did not eat meat, nor raise fowls. They ate rice, salad leaves boiled in ghee, pickles and vegetables.{{sfn|JV Chelliah|1946|pp=98–100}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.org/details/pattupattutentamilidyllschelliahj.v._108_Q|first=Zahira|last=Badami|title=Pattupattu Ten Tamil Idylls Chelliah J. V.|website=Internet Archive}}</ref> Apart from the Sanskrit Vedas there are other texts like ] and ] called as Tamil Veda and Dravida Veda.<ref>Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, {{ISBN|978-0-87249-965-2}}, p. 194</ref><ref name="John Carman 1989 pp. 259–261">John Carman (1989), The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the Tiruvaymoli, University of Chicago Press, {{ISBN|978-0-226-09305-5}}, pp. 259–261</ref> | |||
==Authority of the Vedas== | |||
Some post-Vedic texts, including the ], the ] and certain ]s, refer to themselves as the "]".<ref>{{Harvnb|Sullivan|1994|p=385}}</ref> The earliest reference to such a "fifth Veda" is found in the ]. "]" is a term for canonical ] ] texts. | |||
The various ] and ] have taken differing positions on the authority of the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (]).{{refn|group=note|Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not ] authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological ] authority by a Hindu orthodox school."{{sfn|Freschi|2012|p=62}} This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.}} Other ] traditions, such as ], ], ] and ], which do not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (]) schools.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=82}}<ref name="EB_astika"/> | |||
Certain traditions which are often seen as being part of Hinduism also rejected the Vedas. For example, authors of the tantric ] tradition, like Siddha Mukundadeva, rejected the Vedas' authority.<ref>Young, Mary (2014). ''The Baul Tradition: Sahaj Vision East and West,'' pp. 27-36. SCB Distributors.</ref> Likewise, some tantric Shaiva Agamas reject the Vedas. The ''Anandabhairava-tantra'' for example, states that "the wise man should not elect as his authority the word of the Vedas, which is full of impurity, produces but scanty and transitory fruits and is limited."<ref>Dyczkowski, Mark S. G. (1988). ''The Canon of the Saivagama and the Kubjika: Tantras of the Western Kaula Tradition,'' p. 9. SUNY Press.</ref> | |||
Though many religious Hindus implicitly acknowledge the authority of the Vedas, this acknowledgment is often "no more than a declaration that someone considers himself a Hindu",{{sfn|Lipner|2012|p=16}}{{refn|group=note|Lipner quotes Brockington (1981), ''The sacred tread'', p.5.}} and "most Indians today pay lip service to the Veda and have no regard for the contents of the text."<ref>Axel Michaels (2004), Hinduism: ''Past and Present'', Princeton University Press, p.18; see also Julius Lipner (2012), ''Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices'', Routledge, p.77; and Brian K. Smith (2008), ''Hinduism'', p.101, in Jacob Neusner (ed.), Sacred Texts and Authority, Wipf and Stock Publishers.</ref> Some Hindus challenge the authority of the Vedas, thereby implicitly acknowledging its importance to the history of Hinduism, states Lipner.{{sfn|Lipner|2012|pp=15–17}} | |||
While Hindu reform movement such as ] and ] accept the authority of Vedas,<ref>{{cite book|title=Travellers in Faith: Studies of the Tablīghī Jamāʻat as a Transnational Islamic Movement for Faith Renewal|author=Muhammad Khalid Masud|page=50|publisher=BRILL|year=2000|isbn=978-90-04-11622-1}}</ref> ] like ] and ];{{sfn|Rambachan|1994|p=272}} and social reformers like ] reject its authority.{{sfn|Nagappa|2011|p=283 ("It is said that the Varna system Sanatan Hindu")}} | |||
==Western Indology== | |||
{{further|Sanskrit studies}} | |||
The study of Sanskrit in the West began in the 17th century. In the early 19th century, ] drew attention to Vedic texts, specifically the Upanishads. The importance of Vedic Sanskrit for ] was also recognized in the early 19th century. English translations of the Samhitas were published in the later 19th century, in the '']'' series edited by ] between 1879 and 1910.<ref>Müller, Friedrich Max (author) & Stone, Jon R. (author, editor) (2002). ''The essential Max Müller: on language, mythology, and religion''. Illustrated edition. Palgrave Macmillan. {{ISBN|978-0-312-29309-3}}. Source: (accessed: Friday May 7, 2010), p. 44</ref> ] also presented English translations of the four Samhitas, published 1889 to 1899. | |||
Rigveda manuscripts were selected for inscription in ]'s ] ] in 2007.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hinduism.about.com/od/scripturesepics/a/rigveda.htm|title=Rig Veda in UNESCO Memory of the World Register|access-date=30 September 2011|archive-date=27 September 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927045638/http://hinduism.about.com/od/scripturesepics/a/rigveda.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Hinduism|Books|History | |||
}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{reflist| |
{{reflist|group=note|refs= | ||
{{refn|group=note|name="dating"|It is certain that the hymns of the Rig Veda post-date ] separation of ca. 2000 BCE and probably that of the relevant Mitanni documents of {{circa}} 1400 BCE. The oldest available text is estimated to be from 1200 BCE. Philological estimates tend to date the bulk of the text to the second half of the second millennium: | |||
* ]: "the hymns of the Rig-Veda are said to date from 1500 B.C."{{sfn|Müller|1892}} | |||
* The ] (s.v. ], p. 306) gives 1500–1000 BCE. | |||
* Flood and Witzel both mention {{circa}} 1500–1200 BCE.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=37}}{{sfn|Witzel|1995|p=4}} | |||
* Anthony mentions {{circa}} 1500–1300 BCE.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=454}} | |||
* Thomas Oberlies (''Die Religion des Rgveda'', 1998, p. 158) based on 'cumulative evidence' sets a wide range of 1700–1100 BCE.{{sfn|Oberlies|1998|p=158}} {{harvnb|Oberlies|1998|p=155}} gives an estimate of 1100 BCE for the youngest hymns in book 10.{{sfn|Oberlies|1998|p=155}} | |||
* {{harvnb|Witzel|1995|p=4}} mentions {{circa}} 1500–1200 BCE. According to {{harvnb|Witzel|1997|p=263}}, the whole Rig Vedic period may have lasted from {{circa|1900 BCE|1200 BCE}}: "the bulk of the RV represents only 5 or 6 generations of kings (and of the contemporary poets)24 of the Pūru and Bharata tribes. It contains little else before and after this “snapshot” view of contemporary Rgvedic history, as reported by these contemporary “tape recordings.” On the other hand, the whole Rgvedic period may have lasted even up to 700 years, from the infiltration of the Indo-Aryans into the subcontinent, c. 1900 B.C. (at the utmost, the time of collapse of the Indus civilization), up to c. 1200 B.C., the time of the introduction of iron which is first mentioned in the clearly post-vedic hymns of the Atharvaveda."}} | |||
{{refn|group=note|name="Freschi_2012"|Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not ] authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological ] authority by a Hindu orthodox school."{{harvnb|Freschi|2012|p=62}} This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.}} | |||
}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
*{{citation |last=Apte |first=Vaman Shivram |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Practical Sanskrit Dictionary |year=1965 | edition=4th revised & enlarged |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |location=Delhi |isbn=81-208-0567-4 }}. | |||
*{{citation |last=Avari |first=Burjor |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=India: The Ancient Past|year=2007 |publisher=Routledge|location=London |isbn= 978-0-415-35616-9}} | |||
*{{citation |last=Flood |first=Gavin |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=An Introduction to Hinduism |year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location= |isbn= 0-521-43878-0}} | |||
*{{citation |editor-last=Flood |editor-first=Gavin |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism|year=2003 |publisher=Blackwell|location=Malden, MA|isbn=1-4051-3251-5 }} | |||
*{{citation |last=Holdrege |first=Barbara A. |title=Veda and Torah |year=1995 |publisher= SUNY Press|location= |isbn=0791416399|url= }} | |||
*{{citation |last=MacDonell |first=Arthur Anthony | authorlink = Arthur Anthony Macdonell|title=A History Of Sanskrit Literature |year=2004 |publisher= Kessinger Publishing|location= |isbn=1417906197}} | |||
*{{Citation | last =Michaels | first =Axel | year =2004 | title =Hinduism: Past and Present | publisher =Princeton University Press | isbn =0-691-08953-1}} | |||
* {{Citation | publication-date=2006 | editor-last=Monier-Williams | editor-first=Monier | editor-link=Monier Monier-Williams | title=Monier-Williams Sanskrit Dictionary | publisher=Nataraj Books | isbn=18-81338-58-4}}. | |||
*{{citation |last=Muir |first=John | authorlink=John Muir (indologist)|title=Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and Progress of the Religion and Institutions of India |year=1861 |publisher= Williams and Norgate|url=http://books.google.com/books/pdf/Original_Sanskrit_Texts_on_the_Origin_an.pdf?id=_VCXTBk-PtoC }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Muller |first=Max|authorlink=Max Muller|title=Chips from a German Workshop |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=J8Zo_rtoWAEC|year=1891 |publisher=C. Scribner's sons |location=New York}}. | |||
*{{Citation | editor-last=Radhakrishnan | editor-first=Sarvepalli | editor-link=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan | editor2-last=Moore | editor2-first=Charles A. | title=A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy | year=1957 | edition=12th Princeton Paperback | publisher=Princeton University Press | isbn=0-691-01958-4}}. | |||
*Smith, Brian K., ''Canonical Authority and Social Classification: Veda and "Varṇa" in Ancient Indian Texts-'', History of Religions, The University of Chicago Press (1992), 103-125. | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Sullivan |first= B. M.|year= 1994 |month= Summer |title=The Religious Authority of the Mahabharata: Vyasa and Brahma in the Hindu Scriptural Tradition |journal=Journal of the American Academy of Religion |volume=62 |issue=1 |pages=377-401}} | |||
*{{citation |last=Witzel |first=Michael (ed.)| authorlink = Michael Witzel|title=Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts. New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas |year=1997 |series=Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora vol. 2|publisher=Harvard University Press|location = Cambridge}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Zaehner |first=R. C. |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Hindu Scriptures|year=1966 |publisher=Everyman's Library|location=London |isbn= }} | |||
== |
==Sources== | ||
{{sfn whitelist|CITEREFMonier-Williams1899}} | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
<!-- A --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Anthony | first =David W. | year =2007 | title =The Horse The Wheel And Language. How Bronze-Age Riders From the Eurasian Steppes Shaped The Modern World | publisher =Princeton University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Apte |first=Vaman Shivaram |title=The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary |year=1965 | edition=4th revised & enlarged |publisher=] |location=Delhi |isbn=978-81-208-0567-5}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Avari |first=Burjor |title=India: The Ancient Past|year=2007 |publisher=Routledge|location=London |isbn= 978-0-415-35616-9}} | |||
<!-- B --> | |||
* {{Citation|last=Banerji|first=Sures Chandra|year=1989|title=A Companion to Sanskrit Literature|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|isbn=978-81-208-0063-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JkOAEdIsdUsC}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Bartley | first =Christ |year=2001 | chapter =Shankara | editor-last =Leaman | editor-first =Oliver | title =Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy | publisher =Routledge |isbn=978-0-4151-7281-3}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Bhattacharya | first =Ashim | year =2006 | title =Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology | publisher =iUniverse | isbn =978-0-595-38455-6}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Broo | first =Mans | year =2016 | chapter =Rites of Burial and Immersion: Hindu Ritual practices on Disposing of Sacred Texts in Vrindavan | editor-last =Myrvold | editor-first =Kristina | title =The Death of Sacred Texts: Ritual Disposal and Renovation of Texts in World Religions | publisher =Routledge}} | |||
* {{Citation | editor-last1 =Buswell | editor-first1 = Robert E. | editor-last2 =Lopez | editor-first2 =Donald S. Jr. | year =2013 | chapter =Nālandā | title =The Princeton dictionary of Buddhism | location =Princeton | publisher =Princeton University Press | isbn =978-1-4008-4805-8 }} | |||
<!-- C --> | |||
*{{cite book|author= JV Chelliah|title= Pattupattu – Ten Tamil Idylls (Tamil Verses with Englilsh Translation)| year= 1946|url = https://archive.org/details/PattupattuTenTamilIdylls_20180715/page/n1| publisher= Tamil University (1985 print)}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Collins | first =Randall | year =2009 | title =The Sociology of Philosophies | publisher =Harvard University Press}} | |||
* {{cite book | editor-last1=Coward | editor-first1=Harold G. | editor-last2=Raja | editor-first2=K. Kunjunni | editor-last3=Potter | editor-first3=Karl | year=1990 | title=Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 5: The Philosophy of the Grammarians | publisher=Princeton University Press | isbn=978-81-208-0426-5 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2CEj6wRqeRAC }} | |||
* {{cite book | last =Coward | first =Harold | year =2008 | title =The perfectibility of human nature in eastern and western thought | publisher =SUNY Press | isbn =978-0-7914-7336-8 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=LkE_8uch5P0C | author-link =Harold Coward }} | |||
<!-- D --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Dalal | first =Roshen | year =2014 | title =The Vedas: An Introduction to Hinduism's Sacred Texts | publisher =Penguin UK | isbn =978-81-8475-763-7 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=UCEoAwAAQBAJ }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Deshpande | first =Madhav M. | year =1990 | title =Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical Sounds | journal =The Adyar Library Bulleting | url =https://www.scribd.com/document/378011865/Madhav-Deshpande-Changing-Conceptions-of-the-Veda-From-Speech-Acts-to-Magical-Sounds | access-date =7 June 2020 | archive-date =1 August 2020 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200801162442/https://www.scribd.com/document/378011865/Madhav-Deshpande-Changing-Conceptions-of-the-Veda-From-Speech-Acts-to-Magical-Sounds | url-status =dead }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Doniger |first =Wendy | year =2010 | title =The Hindus: An Alternative History | publisher =Oxford University Press}} | |||
* {{Citation |last=Dutt |first=Sagarika |year=2006 |title=India in a Globalized World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I4zaCQAAQBAJ |publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=978-1-84779-607-3 }} | |||
* {{Citation|last=Dwyer|first=Rachel|year=2013|title=What Do Hindus Believe?|publisher=Granta Books|isbn=978-1-84708-940-3}} | |||
<!-- F --> | |||
* {{Citation | last1=Filliozat | first1=Pierre-Sylvain | year=2004 | chapter=Ancient Sanskrit Mathematics: An Oral Tradition and a Written Literature | editor1-last=Chemla | editor1-first=Karine |editor1-link = Karine Chemla | editor2-last=Cohen | editor2-first=Robert S. | editor3-last=Renn | editor3-first=Jürgen |display-editors = 3 | editor4-last=Gavroglu | editor4-first=Kostas | title=History of Science, History of Text (Boston Series in the Philosophy of Science) | pages=137–157 | location=Dordrecht |publisher=Springer Netherlands | doi=10.1007/1-4020-2321-9_7 | isbn=978-1-4020-2320-0 }} | |||
* {{citation | last =Flood | first =Gavin | year =1996 | title =An Introduction to Hinduism | publisher =Cambridge University Press | isbn =978-0-521-43878-0 | author-link =Gavin Flood | url =https://archive.org/details/introductiontohi0000floo | url-access =registration }} | |||
* {{citation | editor-last =Flood | editor-first =Gavin | title =The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism |year=2003 |publisher=Blackwell|location =Malden, Massachusetts | isbn=978-1-4051-3251-0 }} | |||
* {{Citation | editor-last =Flood | editor-first =Gavin | title =The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism |year=2008 | publisher =John Wiley & Sons |location=New York | isbn =978-0-4709-9868-7}} | |||
* {{Citation | editor-last =Frazier | editor-first =Jessica | year =2011 | title =The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies | location =London | publisher =Continuum | isbn =978-0-8264-9966-0 | url =https://archive.org/details/continuumcompani00fraz | url-access =limited }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Freschi | first =Elisa | year =2012 | title =Duty, Language and Exegesis in Prabhakara Mimamsa | publisher =Brill | isbn =978-90-04-22260-1}} | |||
<!-- G --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Galewicz | first =Cezary | year =2004 | chapter =Changing Canons: What did Sayana think he commented upon | editor-last1 =Balcerowicz | editor-first1 =Piotr | editor-last2 =Mejor | editor-first2 =Marek | title =Essays in Indian Philosophy, Religion and Literature | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publishers}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Galewicz | first =Cezary | year =2011 | chapter =Why Should the Flower of Dharma be Invisible? Sayana's Vision of the Unity of the Veda | editor-last =Squarcini | editor-first =Federico | title =Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia | publisher =Anthem Press}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Goody | year =1987 | title =The interface between the written and the oral | publisher =Cambridge University Press}} | |||
* {{Citation | last= Griffiths | first =Paul J. | year =1999 | title =Religious Reading: The Place of Reading in the Practice of Religion | publisher =Oxford University Press}} | |||
<!-- H --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Hexam | first =Irving | year =2011| title =Understanding World Religions: An Interdisciplinary Approach | publisher =Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press | isbn =978-0-310-31448-6}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Holdrege | first =Barbara A. | year =1995 | title =Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture | publisher= SUNY Press | isbn =978-0-7914-1640-2}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Holdrege | first =Barbara A. | year =1996 | title =Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture | publisher= SUNY Press | isbn =978-0-7914-1639-6}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Holdrege | first =Barbara A. | year =2012 | title =Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture | publisher =SUNY Press | isbn =978-1-4384-0695-4}} | |||
<!-- J --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Jackson | first =W.J | year =2016 | title =Vijayanagara Voices: Exploring South Indian History and Hindu Literature | publisher =Routledge}} | |||
* {{Citation| last =Kumar | first =Jay | year=2014| chapter =Ayurveda and Early Indian Medicine | editor-last1 =Johnston | editor-first1 =Lucas F. | editor-last2 =Bauman | editor-first2 =Whitney |title=Science and Religion: One Planet, Many Possibilities|publisher=Routledge}} | |||
<!-- K --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Klostermaier | first =Klaus | year =1994 | title =A Survey of Hinduism | edition =second | publisher =State University of New York Press | isbn =978-0-7914-2109-3}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Klostermaier | first =Klaus | year =2007 | title =A Survey of Hinduism | edition =third | publisher =State University of New York Press | isbn =978-0-7914-7082-4}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Knapp | first =Stephen | year =2005 | title =The Heart of Hinduism: The Eastern Path to Freedom, Empowerment and Illumination | publisher =iUniverse | isbn =978-0-595-35075-9}} | |||
<!-- L --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Lipner | first =Julius | year =2012 | title =Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices | publisher =Routledge | isbn =978-1-135-24060-8 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=oH1FIareczEC }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Lopez | first =Donald S. Jr.| year =2016 | title =Elaborations on Emptiness: Uses of the Heart Sūtra | publisher =Princeton University Press}} | |||
<!-- M --> | |||
* {{cite book |last=MacDonell |first=Arthur Anthony |year=2004 |title=A Practical Sanskrit Dictionary |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-2000-5}} | |||
* {{Citation|title=History of Philosophy, Eastern and Western|first=T.M.P|last=Mahadevan|editor1=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan|editor2=Ardeshir Ruttonji Wadia|editor3=Dhirendra Mohan Datta|year=1952|publisher=George Allen & Unwin |oclc=929704391}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Michaels | first =Axel | year=2004 | title =Hinduism: Past and Present | publisher =Princeton University Press | isbn =978-0-691-08953-9}} | |||
* {{cite book | last =Michaels | first =Axel | year =2016 | title =Homo Ritualis: Hindu Ritual and Its Significance for Ritual Theory | publisher =Oxford University Press | isbn =978-0-19-026263-1 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=DSaxCgAAQBAJ }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Misra | first =Kamal K. | year =2000 | title =Textbook of Anthropological Linguistics | publisher =Concept Publishing Company}} | |||
* {{MWSD}} <!-- {{sfnref|Monier-Williams|1899}} --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Mookerji | first =R. | year =2011 | orig-year =1947 | title =Ancient Indian Education: Brahmanical and Buddhist | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publishers | isbn =978-81-208-0423-4 | author-link =Radha Kumud Mukherjee}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Müller | first =Max | year =1892 | title =('Veda and Vedanta'), 7th lecture in ''India: What Can It Teach Us: A Course of Lectures Delivered Before the University of Cambridge'' | url =https://archive.org/details/indiawhatcanitte00mluoft | author-link =Max Müller }} | |||
<!-- N --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Nagappa | first =Gowda K. | year =2011 | title =The Bhagavadgita in the Nationalist Discourse | publisher =Oxford University Press | isbn =978-0-19-908847-8 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=4PQtDwAAQBAJ&q=authority+vedas+ambedkar&pg=PT283 }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Nakamura | first =Hajime | year =1983 | title =A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy, part 2 | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publ.}} | |||
<!-- O --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Oberlies | first =Thomas | year =1998 | title =Die Religion des Rgveda: Kompositionsanalyse der Soma-Hymnen des R̥gveda | location =Wien | publisher =Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Olivelle | first =Patrick |year =1998 | orig-year =1996 | title =Upanișads. A New Translation by Patrick Olivelle | publisher =Oxford's World Classics | isbn =978-0-19-954025-9}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Olivelle |first=Patrick |title=Dharmasutras: The Law Codes of Ancient India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gnVxqvPg9a0C |year=1999 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-283882-7 }} | |||
* {{Citation | last1 =Olson | first1 =David R. | last2 =Cole | first2 =Michael | year =2013 | title =Technology, Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: Implications of the Work of Jack Goody | publisher =Psychology Press}} | |||
<!-- P --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Pollock | first =Sheldon | year =2011 | title =Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia | editor-last =Squarcini | editor-first =Federico | publisher =Anthem | isbn =978-0-85728-430-3}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Prasad | first =Leela | year =2007 | title =Poetics of conduct : oral narrative and moral being in a South Indian town | location =New York | publisher =Columbia University Press | isbn =978-0-231-13921-2}} | |||
* {{ Citation | last =Prasad | first = R.U.S. | year =2020 | title =The Rig-Vedic and Post-Rig-Vedic Polity (1500 BCE-500 BCE) | publisher =Vernon Press}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Pruthi | first =R.K | year =2004 | title =Vedic Civilisation | publisher =Discovery Publishing | isbn =81-7141-875-9}} | |||
<!-- R --> | |||
* {{Citation | editor-last=Radhakrishnan | editor-first=Sarvepalli | editor-link=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan | editor2-last=Moore | editor2-first=Charles A. | title=A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy | year=1957 | edition=12th Princeton Paperback | publisher=Princeton University Press | isbn=978-0-691-01958-1 | url=https://archive.org/details/sourcebookinindi00radh }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Rambachan | first =Anantanand | year =1994 | chapter =Redefining the authority of scripture: The rejection of Vedic infallibility by Brahmo Samaj | editor-last =Patton | editor-first =Laurie L. | title =Authority, Anxiety, and Canon: Essays in Vedic Interpretation | publisher =SUNY Press | isbn =978-0-7914-1938-0 | chapter-url =https://books.google.com/books?id=aZjp0kIK5fsC&q=authority+vedas+rejection&pg=PA272 }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Rath | first =Saraju|year=2012|title=Aspects of Manuscript Culture in South India|publisher=Leiden: Brill|isbn=978-90-04-21900-7}} | |||
<!-- S --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Scharfe | first =Hartmut | year =2002 | title =Handbook of Oriental Studies | publisher =Brill Academic | isbn =978-90-04-12556-8}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Schiffman | first =Harold | year =2012 | title =Linguistic Culture and Language Policy | publisher =Routledge}} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Sharma | first =D. | year =2011 | title =Classical Indian Philosophy: A Reader | publisher =Columbia University Press}} | |||
* {{Citation | last1=Staal | first1=Frits | author-link=Frits Staal | year=1986 | title=The Fidelity of Oral Tradition and the Origins of Science | publisher=Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie voor Wetenschappen, North Holland Publishing Company }} | |||
* {{Citation |last=Sullivan |first= B. M.|date=Summer 1994 |title=The Religious Authority of the Mahabharata: Vyasa and Brahma in the Hindu Scriptural Tradition |journal=] |volume=62 |issue=1 |pages=377–401 |doi=10.1093/jaarel/LXII.2.377 }} | |||
<!-- T --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Todd | first =Warren Lee | year =2013 | title =The Ethics of Śaṅkara and Śāntideva: A Selfless Response to an Illusory World | publisher =Ashgate | isbn =978-1-4094-6681-9}} | |||
<!-- W --> | |||
* {{Citation | last =Westerhoff | first =Jan | year =2009 | title =Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction | publisher =Oxford University Press | isbn =978-0-19-538496-3}} | |||
* {{Citation | last1 =Wilke | first1 =Annette | last2 =Moebus | first2 =Oliver | year =2011 | title =Sound and Communication: An Aesthetic Cultural History of Sanskrit Hinduism | publisher =Walter de Gruyter | isbn =978-3-11-018159-3 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=KZCMe67IGPkC }} | |||
* {{Citation |last=Witzel |first=Michael |year=1995 |title=Early Sanskritization: Origin and Development of the Kuru state |journal=EJVS |volume=1 |issue=4 |url=http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0104/ejvs0104article.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220153727/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0104/ejvs0104article.pdf |archive-date=20 February 2012 }} | |||
* {{citation | last =Witzel | first =Michael | year =1997 | chapter =The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu | editor-last =Witzel | editor-first =Michael | title =Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts: New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas | series =Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora; vol. 2 | publisher =Harvard University Press | location =Cambridge | author-link =Michael Witzel | chapter-url =https://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/canon.pdf }} | |||
* {{harvc | last =Witzel | first =Michael | year =2003| c =Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}} | in =Flood }} | |||
* {{harvc | last =Witzel | first =Michael | year =2008| c =Vedas and {{IAST|Upaniṣads}} | in =Flood }} | |||
* {{Citation | last =Wood | first =Michael | year =2007 | title =The Story of India Hardcover | publisher =BBC Worldwide | isbn =978-0-563-53915-5}} | |||
<!-- Z --> | |||
* {{citation |last=Zaehner |first=R. C. |author-link=Robert Charles Zaehner |title=Hindu Scriptures|year=1966 |publisher= J. M. Dent|series=Everyman's Library|location=London }} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
;Overviews | ;Overviews | ||
*J. |
* {{citation|first=J.|last=Gonda|title=Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas|publisher=A History of Indian literature|volume=1|others=Veda and Upanishads|location=Wiesnaden: Harrassowitz|year=1975|isbn=978-3-447-01603-2|author-link=Jan Gonda}}. | ||
*J. |
* {{citation|first=J.A.|last=Santucci|title=An Outline of Vedic Literature|journal=Scholars Press for the American Academy of Religion|year=1976}}. | ||
*S. |
* {{citation|first=S.|last=Shrava|title=A Comprehensive History of Vedic Literature – Brahmana and Aranyaka Works|publisher=Pranava Prakashan|year=1977}}. | ||
*{{citation|url=https://archive.org/stream/vedicconcordance00bloouoft#page/n7/mode/2up|title=A Vedic Concordance|location=]|publisher=Maurice Bloomfield|others=(an alphabetic index to every line, every stanza of the Vedas published before 1906)|year=1906 }}. | |||
*{{citation|url=http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/index.htm#vedas|title=The Vedas at sacred-texts.com|publisher=Sacred Texts}}. | |||
;Concordances | ;Concordances | ||
*M. |
* {{citation|first=M.|last=Bloomfield|title=A Vedic Concordance|year=1907}}. | ||
*Vishva |
* {{citation|first1=Vishva|last1=Bandhu|first2=Bhim|last2=Dev|editor-first=S.|editor-last=Bhaskaran Nair|title=Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa: A Vedic Word-Concordance|publisher=Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute|location=Hoshiarpur|year=1963}}. | ||
*{{citation|url=http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/VedicConcordance/ReadmeEng.html|title=An Enlarged Electronic Version of Bloomfield's A Vedic Concordance|publisher=]}}. | |||
;Conference proceedings | |||
==See also== | |||
* {{citation|last1=Griffiths|first1=Arlo|editor-last=Houben|editor-first=Jan E.M.|title=The Vedas : texts, language & ritual: proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop, Leiden 2002|publisher=Groningen Oriental Studies 20|location=Groningen : Forsten|year=2004|isbn=90-6980-149-3}}. | |||
{{refbegin|2}} | |||
*{{citation|url=http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/Veda.in.Nepal.pdf|title=On the History and the Present State of Vedic Tradition in Nepal|last=Michael|first=Witzel}}. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
;Journals | |||
*] | |||
* {{Citation|last=Arnold|first=Edward Vernon|date=1897|title=Sketch of the Historical Grammar of the Rig and Atharva Vedas|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/592303|journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society|volume=18|pages=203–353|doi=10.2307/592303|jstor=592303|issn=0003-0279}}. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Commons category|Vedas}} | |||
<!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | |||
{{Wiktionary|Veda|Vedic}} | |||
<!--| DO NOT ADD MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A COLLECTION OF |--> | |||
{{Wikiquote}} | |||
<!--| LINKS. If you think that your link might be useful, do not add it here, |--> | |||
{{Prone to spam|date=July 2013}} | |||
<!--| but put it on this article's discussion page first or submit your link |--> | |||
<!--| to the appropriate category at the Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org)|--> | |||
<!--| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |--> | |||
<!--| |--> | |||
<!--| Links that have not been verified WILL BE DELETED. |--> | |||
<!--| See ] and ] for details |--> | |||
<!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | |||
<!-- {{No more links}} | |||
Electronic texts: | |||
Please be cautious adding more external links. | |||
Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links, and should not be used for advertising. | |||
* | |||
* | |||
Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed. | |||
See ] and ] for details. | |||
--> | |||
* {{citation|url=http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de/ebene_1/fiindolo/gretil.htm#Veda|title=GRETIL etexts|website=Goettingen}}. | |||
* , Curlie | |||
{{Hindudharma}} | |||
{{Poetry of different cultures and languages}} | {{Poetry of different cultures and languages}} | ||
{{Religious books}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 13 December 2024
Oldest scriptures of Hinduism "Veda" and "Vedic" redirect here. For other uses, see Veda (disambiguation) and Vedic (disambiguation).
Vedas | |
---|---|
Rigveda manuscript page, Mandala 1, Hymn 1 (Sukta 1), lines 1.1.1 to 1.1.9 (Sanskrit, Devanagari script) | |
Information | |
Religion | Historical Vedic religion Hinduism |
Language | Vedic Sanskrit |
Period | Vedic period
|
Verses | 20,379 mantras |
Full text | |
The Vedas at English Wikisource |
Part of a series on |
Hindu scriptures and texts |
---|
Vedas
Divisions |
UpanishadsRig vedic
Sama vedic Yajur vedic Atharva vedic |
Other scriptures |
Related Hindu texts |
Vedangas |
PuranasBrahma puranas
Vaishnava puranas Shaiva puranas Shakta puranas |
Itihasa |
Sangam literature |
Shastras and sutras
|
Timeline |
The Vedas (/ˈveɪdəz/ or /ˈviːdəz/; Sanskrit: वेदः, romanized: Vēdaḥ, lit. 'knowledge'), sometimes collectively called the Veda, are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism.
There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Brahmanas (commentaries on and explanation of rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices – Yajñas), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge). Some scholars add a fifth category – the Upāsanās (worship). The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox sramana traditions. The Samhitas and Brahmanas describe daily rituals and are generally meant for the Brahmacharya and Gr̥hastha stages of the Chaturashrama system, while the Aranyakas and Upanishads are meant for the Vānaprastha and Sannyasa stages, respectively.
Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"), distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smr̥ti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless", revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation.
The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques. The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."
The various Indian philosophies and Hindu sects have taken differing positions on the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy that acknowledge the importance or primal authority of the Vedas comprise Hindu philosophy specifically and are together classified as the six "orthodox" (āstika) schools. However, śramaṇa traditions, such as Charvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism, and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authoritative, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools.
Etymology and usage
The Sanskrit word véda "knowledge, wisdom" is derived from the root vid- "to know". This is reconstructed as being derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *weyd-, meaning "see" or "know".
The noun is from Proto-Indo-European *weydos, cognate to Greek (ϝ)εἶδος "aspect", "form" . This is not to be confused with the homonymous 1st and 3rd person singular perfect tense véda, cognate to Greek (ϝ)οἶδα ((w)oida) "I know". Root cognates are Greek ἰδέα, English wit, Latin videō "I see", Russian ве́дать (védat') "to know", etc.
The Sanskrit term veda as a common noun means "knowledge". The term in some contexts, such as hymn 10.93.11 of the Rigveda, means "obtaining or finding wealth, property", while in some others it means "a bunch of grass together" as in a broom or for ritual fire.
Vedic texts
Vedic Sanskrit corpus
The term "Vedic texts" is used in two distinct meanings:
- Texts composed in Vedic Sanskrit during the Vedic period (Iron Age India)
- Any text considered as "connected to the Vedas" or a "corollary of the Vedas"
The corpus of Vedic Sanskrit texts includes:
- The Samhitas (Sanskrit saṃhitā, "collection"), are collections of metric texts ("mantras"). There are four "Vedic" Samhitas: the Rig-Veda, Yajur-Veda, Sama-Veda and Atharva-Veda, most of which are available in several recensions (śākhā). In some contexts, the term Veda is used to refer only to these Samhitas, the collection of mantras. This is the oldest layer of Vedic texts, which were composed between c. 1500–1200 BCE (Rig Veda book 2–9), and 1200–900 BCE for the other Samhitas. The Samhitas contain invocations to deities like Indra and Agni, "to secure their benediction for success in battles or for welfare of the clan." The complete corpus of Vedic mantras as collected in Bloomfield's Vedic Concordance (1907) consists of some 89,000 padas (metrical feet), of which 72,000 occur in the four Samhitas.
- The Brahmanas are prose texts that comment on and explain the solemn rituals as well as expound on their meaning and many connected themes. Each of the Brahmanas is associated with one of the Samhitas or its recensions. The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the Shatapatha Brahmana), were complete by about 700 BCE. The Brahmanas may either form separate texts or can be partly integrated into the text of the Samhitas. They may also include the Aranyakas and Upanishads.
- The Aranyakas, "wilderness texts" or "forest treaties", were composed by people who meditated in the woods as recluses and are the third part of the Vedas. The texts contain discussions and interpretations of ceremonies, from ritualistic to symbolic meta-ritualistic points of view. It is frequently read in secondary literature.
- Older Principal Upanishads (Bṛhadāraṇyaka, Chandogya, Kaṭha, Kena, Aitareya, and others), composed between 800 BCE and the end of the Vedic period. The Upanishads are largely philosophical works, some in dialogue form. They are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions. Of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads are still influential in Hinduism.
- The texts considered "Vedic" in the sense of "corollaries of the Vedas" are less clearly defined, and may include numerous post-Vedic texts such as the later Upanishads and the Sutra literature, such as Shrauta Sutras and Gryha Sutras, which are smriti texts. Together, the Vedas and these Sutras form part of the Vedic Sanskrit corpus.
While production of Brahmanas and Aranyakas ceased with the end of the Vedic period, additional Upanishads were composed after the end of the Vedic period. The Brahmanas, Aranyakas, and Upanishads, among other things, interpret and discuss the Samhitas in philosophical and metaphorical ways to explore abstract concepts such as the Absolute (Brahman), and the soul or the self (Atman), introducing Vedanta philosophy, one of the major trends of later Hinduism. In other parts, they show evolution of ideas, such as from actual sacrifice to symbolic sacrifice, and of spirituality in the Upanishads. This has inspired later Hindu scholars such as Adi Shankara to classify each Veda into karma-kanda (कर्म खण्ड, action/sacrificial ritual-related sections, the Samhitas and Brahmanas); and jnana-kanda (ज्ञान खण्ड, knowledge/spirituality-related sections, mainly the Upanishads').
Śruti and smṛti
Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"), distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). This indigenous system of categorization was adopted by Max Müller and, while it is subject to some debate, it is still widely used. As Axel Michaels explains:
These classifications are often not tenable for linguistic and formal reasons: There is not only one collection at any one time, but rather several handed down in separate Vedic schools; Upanişads are sometimes not to be distinguished from Āraṇyakas ; Brāhmaṇas contain older strata of language attributed to the Saṃhitās; there are various dialects and locally prominent traditions of the Vedic schools. Nevertheless, it is advisable to stick to the division adopted by Max Müller because it follows the Indian tradition, conveys the historical sequence fairly accurately, and underlies the current editions, translations, and monographs on Vedic literature."
Among the widely known śrutis include the Vedas and their embedded texts – the Samhitas, the Upanishads, the Brahmanas and the Aranyakas. The well-known smṛtis include Bhagavad Gita, Bhagavata Purana and the epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, amongst others.
Authorship
Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeyā, which means "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless". The Vedas, for orthodox Indian theologians, are considered revelations seen by ancient sages after intense meditation, and texts that have been more carefully preserved since ancient times. In the Hindu Epic Mahabharata, the creation of Vedas is credited to Brahma. The Vedic hymns themselves assert that they were skillfully created by Rishis (sages), after inspired creativity, just as a carpenter builds a chariot.
The oldest part of the Rig Veda Samhita was orally composed in north-western India (Punjab) between c. 1500 and 1200 BCE, while book 10 of the Rig Veda, and the other Samhitas were composed between 1200 and 900 BCE more eastward, between the Yamuna and the Ganges rivers, the heartland of Aryavarta and the Kuru Kingdom (c. 1200 – c. 900 BCE). The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the redaction of the Samhitas, date to c. 1000–500 BCE.
According to tradition, Vyasa is the compiler of the Vedas, who arranged the four kinds of mantras into four Samhitas (Collections).
Chronology, transmission, and interpretation
See also: Vedic periodChronology
The Vedas are among the oldest sacred texts. The bulk of the Rigveda Samhita was composed in the northwestern region (Punjab) of the Indian subcontinent, most likely between c. 1500 and 1200 BCE, although a wider approximation of c. 1700–1100 BCE has also been given. The other three Samhitas are considered to date from the time of the Kuru Kingdom, approximately c. 1200–900 BCE. The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the redaction of the Samhitas, date to c. 1000–500 BCE, resulting in a Vedic period, spanning the mid 2nd to mid 1st millennium BCE, or the Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age. The Vedic period reaches its peak only after the composition of the mantra texts, with the establishment of the various shakhas all over Northern India which annotated the mantra samhitas with Brahmana discussions of their meaning, and reaches its end in the age of Buddha and Panini and the rise of the Mahajanapadas (archaeologically, Northern Black Polished Ware). Michael Witzel gives a time span of c. 1500 to c. 500–400 BCE. Witzel makes special reference to the Near Eastern Mitanni material of the 14th century BCE, the only epigraphic record of Indo-Aryan contemporary to the Rigvedic period. He gives 150 BCE (Patañjali) as a terminus ante quem for all Vedic Sanskrit literature, and 1200 BCE (the early Iron Age) as terminus post quem for the Atharvaveda.
Transmission
The Vedas were orally transmitted since their composition in the Vedic period for several millennia. The authoritative transmission of the Vedas is by an oral tradition in a sampradaya from father to son or from teacher (guru) to student (shishya), believed to be initiated by the Vedic rishis who heard the primordial sounds. Only this tradition, embodied by a living teacher, can teach the correct pronunciation of the sounds and explain hidden meanings, in a way the "dead and entombed manuscript" cannot do. As Leela Prasad states, "According to Shankara, the "correct tradition" (sampradaya) has as much authority as the written Shastra", explaining that the tradition "bears the authority to clarify and provide direction in the application of knowledge".
The emphasis in this transmission is on the "proper articulation and pronunciation of the Vedic sounds", as prescribed in the Shiksha, the Vedanga (Vedic study) of sound as uttered in a Vedic recitation, mastering the texts "literally forward and backward in fully acoustic fashion". Houben and Rath note that the Vedic textual tradition cannot simply be characterized as oral, "since it also depends significantly on a memory culture". The Vedas were preserved with precision with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques, such as memorizing the texts in eleven different modes of recitation (pathas), using the alphabet as a mnemotechnical device, "matching physical movements (such as nodding the head) with particular sounds and chanting in a group" and visualizing sounds by using mudras (hand signs). This provided an additional visual confirmation, and also an alternate means to check the reading integrity by the audience, in addition to the audible means. Houben and Rath note that a strong "memory culture" existed in ancient India when texts were transmitted orally, before the advent of writing in the early first millennium CE. According to Staal, criticising the Goody-Watt hypothesis "according to which literacy is more reliable than orality", this tradition of oral transmission "is closely related to Indian forms of science" and "by far the more remarkable" than the relatively recent tradition of written transmission.
While according to Mookerji, understanding the meaning (vedarthajnana or artha-bodha) of the words of the Vedas was part of the Vedic learning, Holdrege and other Indologists have noted that in the transmission of the Samhitas, the emphasis is on the phonology of the sounds (śabda) and not on the meaning (artha) of the mantras. Already at the end of the Vedic period their original meaning had become obscure for "ordinary people", and niruktas, etymological compendia, were developed to preserve and clarify the original meaning of many Sanskrit words. According to Staal, as referenced by Holdrege, though the mantras may have a discursive meaning, when the mantras are recited in the Vedic rituals "they are disengaged from their original context and are employed in ways that have little or nothing to do with their meaning". The words of the mantras are "themselves sacred", and "do not constitute linguistic utterances". Instead, as Klostermaier notes, in their application in Vedic rituals they become magical sounds, "means to an end". Holdrege notes that there are scarce commentaries on the meaning of the mantras, in contrast to the number of commentaries on the Brahmanas and Upanishads, but states that the lack of emphasis on the "discursive meaning does not necessarily imply that they are meaningless". In the Brahmanical perspective, the sounds have their own meaning, mantras are considered as "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base. As long as the purity of the sounds is preserved, the recitation of the mantras will be efficacious, irrespective of whether their discursive meaning is understood by human beings." Frazier further notes that "later Vedic texts sought deeper understanding of the reasons the rituals worked", which indicates that the Brahmin communities considered study to be a "process of understanding".
A literary tradition is traceable in post-Vedic times, after the rise of Buddhism in the Maurya period, perhaps earliest in the Kanva recension of the Yajurveda about the 1st century BCE; however oral tradition of transmission remained active. Jack Goody has argued for an earlier literary tradition, concluding that the Vedas bear hallmarks of a literate culture along with oral transmission, but Goody's views have been strongly criticised by Falk, Lopez Jr,. and Staal, though they have also found some support.
The Vedas were written down only after 500 BCE, but only the orally transmitted texts are regarded as authoritative, given the emphasis on the exact pronunciation of the sounds. Witzel suggests that attempts to write down the Vedic texts towards the end of 1st millennium BCE were unsuccessful, resulting in smriti rules explicitly forbidding the writing down of the Vedas. Due to the ephemeral nature of the manuscript material (birch bark or palm leaves), surviving manuscripts rarely surpass an age of a few hundred years. The Sampurnanand Sanskrit University has a Rigveda manuscript from the 14th century; however, there are a number of older Veda manuscripts in Nepal that are dated from the 11th century onwards.
Vedic learning
Main article: SvādhyāyaThe Vedas, Vedic rituals and its ancillary sciences called the Vedangas, were part of the curriculum at ancient universities such as at Taxila, Nalanda and Vikramashila. According to Deshpande, "the tradition of the Sanskrit grammarians also contributed significantly to the preservation and interpretation of Vedic texts." Yāska (4th c. BCE) wrote the Nirukta, which reflects the concerns about the loss of meaning of the mantras, while Pāṇinis (4th c. BCE) Aṣṭādhyāyī is the most important surviving text of the Vyākaraṇa traditions. Mimamsa scholar Sayanas (14th c. CE) major Vedartha Prakasha is a rare commentary on the Vedas, which is also referred to by contemporary scholars.
Yaska and Sayana, reflecting an ancient understanding, state that the Veda can be interpreted in three ways, giving "the truth about gods, dharma and parabrahman." The pūrva-kāņda (or karma-kanda), the part of the Veda dealing with ritual, gives knowledge of dharma, "which brings us satisfaction." The uttara-kanda (or jnana-kanda), the part of the Veda dealing with the knowledge of the absolute, gives knowledge of Parabrahma, "which fulfills all of our desires." According to Holdrege, for the exponents of karma-kandha the Veda is to be "inscribed in the minds and hearts of men" by memorization and recitation, while for the exponents of the jnana-kanda and meditation the Vedas express a transcendental reality which can be approached with mystical means.
Holdrege notes that in Vedic learning "priority has been given to recitation over interpretation" of the Samhitas. Galewicz states that Sayana, a Mimamsa scholar, "thinks of the Veda as something to be trained and mastered to be put into practical ritual use", noticing that "it is not the meaning of the mantras that is most essential but rather the perfect mastering of their sound form." According to Galewicz, Sayana saw the purpose (artha) of the Veda as the "artha of carrying out sacrifice", giving precedence to the Yajurveda. For Sayana, whether the mantras had meaning depended on the context of their practical usage. This conception of the Veda, as a repertoire to be mastered and performed, takes precedence over the internal meaning or "autonomous message of the hymns." Most Śrauta rituals are not performed in the modern era, and those that are, are rare.
Mukherjee notes that the Rigveda, and Sayana's commentary, contain passages criticizing as fruitless mere recitation of the Ŗik (words) without understanding their inner meaning or essence, the knowledge of dharma and Parabrahman. Mukherjee concludes that in the Rigvedic education of the mantras "the contemplation and comprehension of their meaning was considered as more important and vital to education than their mere mechanical repetition and correct pronunciation." Mookei refers to Sayana as stating that "the mastery of texts, akshara-praptī, is followed by artha-bodha, perception of their meaning." Mukherjee explains that the Vedic knowledge was first perceived by the rishis and munis. Only the perfect language of the Vedas, as in contrast to ordinary speech, can reveal these truths, which were preserved by committing them to memory. According to Mukherjee, while these truths are imparted to the student by the memorized texts, "the realization of Truth" and the knowledge of paramatman as revealed to the rishis is the real aim of Vedic learning, and not the mere recitation of texts. The supreme knowledge of the Absolute, para Brahman-jnana, the knowledge of rta and satya, can be obtained by taking vows of silence and obedience sense-restraint, dhyana, the practice of tapas (austerities), and discussing the Vedanta.
Vedic schools or recensions
Main article: ShakhaThe four Vedas were transmitted in various śākhās (branches, schools). Each school likely represented an ancient community of a particular area, or kingdom. Each school followed its own canon. Multiple recensions (revisions) are known for each of the Vedas. Thus, states Witzel as well as Renou, in the 2nd millennium BCE, there was likely no canon of one broadly accepted Vedic texts, no Vedic “Scripture”, but only a canon of various texts accepted by each school. Some of these texts have survived, most lost or yet to be found. Rigveda that survives in modern times, for example, is in only one extremely well preserved school of Śåkalya, from a region called Videha, in modern north Bihar, south of Nepal. The Vedic canon in its entirety consists of texts from all the various Vedic schools taken together.
There were Vedic schools that believed in polytheism in which numerous gods had different natural functions, henotheistic beliefs where only one god was worshipped but others were thought to exist, monotheistic beliefs in a single god, agnosticism, and monistic beliefs where "there is an absolute reality that goes beyond the gods and that includes or transcends everything that exists." Indra, Agni, and Yama were popular subjects of worship by polytheist organizations.
Each of the four Vedas were shared by the numerous schools, but revised, interpolated and adapted locally, in and after the Vedic period, giving rise to various recensions of the text. Some texts were revised into the modern era, raising significant debate on parts of the text which are believed to have been corrupted at a later date. The Vedas each have an Index or Anukramani, the principal work of this kind being the general Index or Sarvānukramaṇī.
Prodigious energy was expended by ancient Indian culture in ensuring that these texts were transmitted from generation to generation with inordinate fidelity. For example, memorization of the sacred Vedas included up to eleven forms of recitation of the same text. The texts were subsequently "proof-read" by comparing the different recited versions. Forms of recitation included the jaṭā-pāṭha (literally "mesh recitation") in which every two adjacent words in the text were first recited in their original order, then repeated in the reverse order, and finally repeated in the original order. That these methods have been effective, is attested to by the preservation of the most ancient Indian religious text, the Rigveda, as redacted into a single text during the Brahmana period, without any variant readings within that school.
The Vedas were orally transmitted by memorization, and were written down only after 500 BCE, All printed editions of the Vedas that survive in the modern times are likely the version existing in about the 16th century CE.
Four Vedas
Part of a series on Hindu scriptures |
Vedas and their Shakhas |
---|
RigvedaShakala Bhashkala |
SamavedaRanayana Shatyamukhya Vyasa Bhaguri Olundi Goulgulvi Bhanumanoupamayava Karati Mashaka Argya Varshgagavya Kuthuma Shakugitre Jaiminiya |
Krishna YajurvedaTaittiriya Samhita Maitrayani Samhita Karaka Katha Samhita Kapisthala Kahta Samhita Kathaka |
Shukla YajurvedaKanava Madhyandin |
AtharvavedaShaunaka Paippalada Stauda Mauda Jajala Jalada Kuntap Brahmavada Devadarsa Caranavaidya |
Hinduism portal |
The canonical division of the Vedas is fourfold (turīya) viz.,
Of these, the first three were the principal original division, also called "trayī vidyā"; that is, "the triple science" of reciting hymns (Rigveda), performing sacrifices (Yajurveda), and chanting songs (Samaveda). The Rig Veda most likely was composed between c. 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE. Witzel notes that it is the Vedic period itself, where incipient lists divide the Vedic texts into three (trayī) or four branches: Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva.
Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies such as newborn baby's rites of passage, coming of age, marriages, retirement and cremation, sacrifices and symbolic sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge). The Upasanas (short ritual worship-related sections) are considered by some scholars as the fifth part. Witzel notes that the rituals, rites and ceremonies described in these ancient texts reconstruct to a large degree the Indo-European marriage rituals observed in a region spanning the Indian subcontinent, Persia and the European area, and some greater details are found in the Vedic era texts such as the Grhya Sūtras.
Only one version of the Rigveda is known to have survived into the modern era. Several different versions of the Sama Veda and the Atharva Veda are known, and many different versions of the Yajur Veda have been found in different parts of South Asia.
The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox sramana-traditions.
Rigveda
Main article: Rigveda—Rig Veda 10.129.6–7Nasadiya Sukta (Hymn of non-Eternity):
Who really knows?
Who can here proclaim it?
Whence, whence this creation sprang?
Gods came later, after the creation of this universe.Who then knows whence it has arisen?
Whether God's will created it, or whether He was mute;
Only He who is its overseer in highest heaven knows,
He only knows, or perhaps He does not know.
The Rigveda Samhita is the oldest extant Indic text. It is a collection of 1,028 Vedic Sanskrit hymns and 10,600 verses in all, organized into ten books (Sanskrit: mandalas). The hymns are dedicated to Rigvedic deities.
The books were composed by poets from different priestly groups over a period of several centuries between c. 1500 and 1200 BCE, (the early Vedic period) in the Punjab (Sapta Sindhu) region of the northwest Indian subcontinent. According to Michael Witzel, the initial codification of the Rigveda took place at the end of the Rigvedic period at c. 1200 BCE, in the early Kuru kingdom.
The Rigveda is structured based on clear principles. The Veda begins with a small book addressed to Agni, Indra, Soma and other gods, all arranged according to decreasing total number of hymns in each deity collection; for each deity series, the hymns progress from longer to shorter ones, but the number of hymns per book increases. Finally, the meter too is systematically arranged from jagati and tristubh to anustubh and gayatri as the text progresses.
The rituals became increasingly complex over time, and the king's association with them strengthened both the position of the Brahmans and the kings. The Rajasuya rituals, performed with the coronation of a king, "set in motion cyclical regenerations of the universe." In terms of substance, the nature of hymns shift from praise of deities in early books to Nasadiya Sukta with questions such as, "what is the origin of the universe?, do even gods know the answer?", the virtue of Dāna (charity) in society, and other metaphysical issues in its hymns.
There are similarities between the mythology, rituals and linguistics in Rigveda and those found in ancient central Asia, Iranian and Hindukush (Afghanistan) regions.
Samaveda
Main article: SamavedaThe Samaveda Samhita consists of 1549 stanzas, taken almost entirely (except for 75 mantras) from the Rigveda. While its earliest parts are believed to date from as early as the Rigvedic period, the existing compilation dates from the post-Rigvedic Mantra period of Vedic Sanskrit, between c. 1200 and 1000 BCE or "slightly later", roughly contemporary with the Atharvaveda and the Yajurveda.
The Samaveda samhita has two major parts. The first part includes four melody collections (gāna, गान) and the second part three verse “books” (ārcika, आर्चिक). A melody in the song books corresponds to a verse in the arcika books. Just as in the Rigveda, the early sections of Samaveda typically begin with hymns to Agni and Indra but shift to the abstract. Their meters shift also in a descending order. The songs in the later sections of the Samaveda have the least deviation from the hymns derived from the Rigveda.
In the Samaveda, some of the Rigvedic verses are repeated. Including repetitions, there are a total of 1875 verses numbered in the Samaveda recension translated by Griffith. Two major recensions have survived, the Kauthuma/Ranayaniya and the Jaiminiya. Its purpose was liturgical, and they were the repertoire of the udgātṛ or "singer" priests.
Yajurveda
Main article: YajurvedaThe Yajurveda Samhita consists of prose mantras. It is a compilation of ritual offering formulas that were said by a priest while an individual performed ritual actions such as those before the yajna fire. The core text of the Yajurveda falls within the classical Mantra period of Vedic Sanskrit at the end of the 2nd millennium BCE – younger than the Rigveda, and roughly contemporary with the Atharvaveda, the Rigvedic Khilani, and the Sāmaveda. Witzel dates the Yajurveda hymns to the early Indian Iron Age, after c. 1200 and before 800 BCE. corresponding to the early Kuru Kingdom.
The earliest and most ancient layer of Yajurveda samhita includes about 1,875 verses, that are distinct yet borrow and build upon the foundation of verses in Rigveda. Unlike the Samaveda which is almost entirely based on Rigveda mantras and structured as songs, the Yajurveda samhitas are in prose, and they are different from earlier Vedic texts linguistically. The Yajur Veda has been the primary source of information about sacrifices during Vedic times and associated rituals.
There are two major groups of texts in this Veda: the "Black" (Krishna) and the "White" (Shukla). The term "black" implies "the un-arranged, motley collection" of verses in Yajurveda, in contrast to the "white" (well arranged) Yajurveda. The White Yajurveda separates the Samhita from its Brahmana (the Shatapatha Brahmana), the Black Yajurveda intersperses the Samhita with Brahmana commentary. Of the Black Yajurveda, texts from four major schools have survived (Maitrayani, Katha, Kapisthala-Katha, Taittiriya), while of the White Yajurveda, two (Kanva and Madhyandina). The youngest layer of Yajurveda text is not related to rituals nor sacrifice, it includes the largest collection of primary Upanishads, influential to various schools of Hindu philosophy.
Atharvaveda
Main article: AtharvavedaThe Artharvaveda Samhita is the text 'belonging to the Atharvan and Angirasa poets. It has about 760 hymns, and about 160 of the hymns are in common with the Rigveda. Most of the verses are metrical, but some sections are in prose. Two different versions of the text – the Paippalāda and the Śaunakīya – have survived into the modern times. The Atharvaveda was not considered as a Veda in the Vedic era, and was accepted as a Veda in late 1st millennium BCE. It was compiled last, probably around 900 BCE, although some of its material may go back to the time of the Rigveda, or earlier.
The Atharvaveda is sometimes called the "Veda of magical formulas", an epithet declared to be incorrect by other scholars. The Samhita layer of the text likely represents a developing 2nd millennium BCE tradition of magico-religious rites to address superstitious anxiety, spells to remove maladies believed to be caused by demons, and herbs- and nature-derived potions as medicine. The text, states Kenneth Zysk, is one of oldest surviving record of the evolutionary practices in religious medicine and reveals the "earliest forms of folk healing of Indo-European antiquity". Many books of the Atharvaveda Samhita are dedicated to rituals without magic, such as to philosophical speculations and to theosophy.
The Atharva veda has been a primary source for information about Vedic culture, the customs and beliefs, the aspirations and frustrations of everyday Vedic life, as well as those associated with kings and governance. The text also includes hymns dealing with the two major rituals of passage – marriage and cremation. The Atharva Veda also dedicates significant portion of the text asking the meaning of a ritual.
Embedded Vedic texts
Manuscripts of the Vedas are in the Sanskrit language, but in many regional scripts in addition to the Devanagari. Top: Grantha script (Tamil Nadu), Below: Malayalam script (Kerala).Brahmanas
Further information: BrahmanaThe Brahmanas are commentaries, explanation of proper methods and meaning of Vedic Samhita rituals in the four Vedas. They also incorporate myths, legends and in some cases philosophy. Each regional Vedic shakha (school) has its own operating manual-like Brahmana text, most of which have been lost. A total of 19 Brahmana texts have survived into modern times: two associated with the Rigveda, six with the Yajurveda, ten with the Samaveda and one with the Atharvaveda. The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the Shatapatha Brahmana), were complete by about 700 BCE. According to Jan Gonda, the final codification of the Brahmanas took place in pre-Buddhist times (ca. 600 BCE).
The substance of the Brahmana text varies with each Veda. For example, the first chapter of the Chandogya Brahmana, one of the oldest Brahmanas, includes eight ritual suktas (hymns) for the ceremony of marriage and rituals at the birth of a child. The first hymn is a recitation that accompanies offering a Yajna oblation to Agni (fire) on the occasion of a marriage, and the hymn prays for prosperity of the couple getting married. The second hymn wishes for their long life, kind relatives, and a numerous progeny. The third hymn is a mutual marriage pledge, between the bride and groom, by which the two bind themselves to each other. The sixth through last hymns of the first chapter in Chandogya Brahmana are ritual celebrations on the birth of a child and wishes for health, wealth, and prosperity with a profusion of cows and artha. However, these verses are incomplete expositions, and their complete context emerges only with the Samhita layer of text.
Aranyakas and Upanishads
Further information: Vedanta, Upanishads, and AranyakaThe Aranyakas layer of the Vedas include rituals, discussion of symbolic meta-rituals, as well as philosophical speculations.
Aranyakas, however, neither are homogeneous in content nor in structure. They are a medley of instructions and ideas, and some include chapters of Upanishads within them. Two theories have been proposed on the origin of the word Aranyakas. One theory holds that these texts were meant to be studied in a forest, while the other holds that the name came from these being the manuals of allegorical interpretation of sacrifices, for those in Vanaprastha (retired, forest-dwelling) stage of their life, according to the historic age-based Ashrama system of human life.
The Upanishads reflect the last composed layer of texts in the Vedas. They are commonly referred to as Vedānta, variously interpreted to mean either the "last chapters, parts of the Vedas" or "the object, the highest purpose of the Veda". The central concern of the Upanishads are the connections "between parts of the human organism and cosmic realities." The Upanishads intend to create a hierarchy of connected and dependent realities, evoking a sense of unity of "the separate elements of the world and of human experience them into a single form." The concepts of Brahman, the Ultimate Reality from which everything arises, and Ātman, the essence of the individual, are central ideas in the Upanishads, and knowing the correspondence between Ātman and Brahman as "the fundamental principle which shapes the world" permits the creation of an integrative vision of the whole. The Upanishads are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions, and of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads have influenced the diverse traditions of Hinduism.
Aranyakas are sometimes identified as karma-kanda (ritualistic section), while the Upanishads are identified as jnana-kanda (spirituality section). In an alternate classification, the early part of Vedas are called Samhitas and the commentary are called the Brahmanas which together are identified as the ceremonial karma-kanda, while Aranyakas and Upanishads are referred to as the jnana-kanda.
Post-Vedic literature
Vedanga
Main article: VedangaThe Vedangas developed towards the end of the vedic period, around or after the middle of the 1st millennium BCE. These auxiliary fields of Vedic studies emerged because the language of the Vedas, composed centuries earlier, became too archaic to the people of that time. The Vedangas were sciences that focused on helping understand and interpret the Vedas that had been composed many centuries earlier.
The six subjects of Vedanga are phonetics (Śikṣā), poetic meter (Chandas), grammar (Vyākaraṇa), etymology and linguistics (Nirukta), rituals and rites of passage (Kalpa), time keeping and astronomy (Jyotiṣa).
Vedangas developed as ancillary studies for the Vedas, but its insights into meters, structure of sound and language, grammar, linguistic analysis and other subjects influenced post-Vedic studies, arts, culture and various schools of Hindu philosophy. The Kalpa Vedanga studies, for example, gave rise to the Dharma-sutras, which later expanded into Dharma-shastras.
Parisista
Main article: PariśiṣṭaPariśiṣṭa "supplement, appendix" is the term applied to various ancillary works of Vedic literature, dealing mainly with details of ritual and elaborations of the texts logically and chronologically prior to them: the Samhitas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Sutras. Naturally classified with the Veda to which each pertains, Parisista works exist for each of the four Vedas. However, only the literature associated with the Atharvaveda is extensive.
- The Āśvalāyana Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa is a very late text associated with the Rigveda canon.
- The Gobhila Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa is a short metrical text of two chapters, with 113 and 95 verses respectively.
- The Kātiya Pariśiṣṭas, ascribed to Kātyāyana, consist of 18 works enumerated self-referentially in the fifth of the series (the Caraṇavyūha) and the Kātyāyana Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa.
- The Kṛṣṇa Yajurveda has 3 parisistas The Āpastamba Hautra Pariśiṣṭa, which is also found as the second praśna of the Satyasāḍha Śrauta Sūtra', the Vārāha Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa
- For the Atharvaveda, there are 79 works, collected as 72 distinctly named parisistas.
Upaveda
The term upaveda ("applied knowledge") is used in traditional literature to designate the subjects of certain technical works. Lists of what subjects are included in this class differ among sources. The Charanavyuha mentions four Upavedas:
- Archery (Dhanurveda), associated with the Yajurveda
- Architecture (Sthapatyaveda), associated with the Rigveda.
- Music and sacred dance (Gāndharvaveda), associated with the Samaveda
- Medicine (Āyurveda), associated with the Atharvaveda.
"Fifth" and other Vedas
Some post-Vedic texts, including the Mahabharata, the Natyasastra and certain Puranas, refer to themselves as the "fifth Veda". The earliest reference to such a "fifth Veda" is found in the Chandogya Upanishad in hymn 7.1.2.
Let drama and dance (Nātya, नाट्य) be the fifth vedic scripture. Combined with an epic story, tending to virtue, wealth, joy and spiritual freedom, it must contain the significance of every scripture, and forward every art. Thus, from all the Vedas, Brahma framed the Nātya Veda. From the Rig Veda he drew forth the words, from the Sama Veda the melody, from the Yajur Veda gesture, and from the Atharva Veda the sentiment.
— First chapter of Nātyaśāstra, Abhinaya Darpana
"Divya Prabandha", for example Tiruvaymoli, is a term for canonical Tamil texts considered as Vernacular Veda by some South Indian Hindus.
Other texts such as the Bhagavad Gita or the Vedanta Sutras are considered shruti or "Vedic" by some Hindu denominations but not universally within Hinduism. The Bhakti movement, and Gaudiya Vaishnavism in particular extended the term veda to include the Sanskrit Epics and Vaishnavite devotional texts such as the Pancharatra.
Puranas
Main article: PuranasThe Puranas is a vast genre of encyclopedic Indian literature about a wide range of topics particularly myths, legends and other traditional lore. Several of these texts are named after major Hindu deities such as Vishnu, Shiva and Devi. There are 18 Maha Puranas (Great Puranas) and 18 Upa Puranas (Minor Puranas), with over 400,000 verses.
The Puranas have been influential in the Hindu culture. They are considered Vaidika (congruent with Vedic literature). The Bhagavata Purana has been among the most celebrated and popular text in the Puranic genre, and is of non-dualistic tenor. The Puranic literature wove with the Bhakti movement in India, and both Dvaita and Advaita scholars have commented on the underlying Vedanta themes in the Maha Puranas.
Vedas in Sangam literature
Vedas finds its earliest literary mention in the Sangam literature dated to the 5th century BCE. The Vedas were read by almost every caste in ancient Tamil Nadu. An Indian historian, archaeologist and epigraphist named Ramachandran Nagaswamy mentions that Tamil Nadu was a land of Vedas and a place where everyone knew the Vedas. The Vedas are also considered as a text filled with deep meaning which can be understood only by scholars. The Purananuru mentions that the ancestors of Velir kings where born from the Sacred fire of a Northern sage and the Paṭṭiṉappālai mentions that the four Vedas were chanted by the priests of Ancient Tamilakam, this shows chanting of Vedas and growing sacred fires are part of the Tamil culture. Vedas are called Maṛai or Vaymoli in parts of South India. Marai literally means "hidden, a secret, mystery". Perumpāṇāṟṟuppaṭai mentions a yupa post (a form of Vedic altar) in the Brahmin village. Vedas are recited by these Brahmins, and even their parrots are mentioned in the poem as those who sing the Vedic hymns. People in these Vedic villages did not eat meat, nor raise fowls. They ate rice, salad leaves boiled in ghee, pickles and vegetables. Apart from the Sanskrit Vedas there are other texts like Naalayira Divya Prabandham and Tevaram called as Tamil Veda and Dravida Veda.
Authority of the Vedas
The various Hindu sects and Indian philosophies have taken differing positions on the authority of the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika). Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Charvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which do not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools.
Certain traditions which are often seen as being part of Hinduism also rejected the Vedas. For example, authors of the tantric Vaishnava Sahajiya tradition, like Siddha Mukundadeva, rejected the Vedas' authority. Likewise, some tantric Shaiva Agamas reject the Vedas. The Anandabhairava-tantra for example, states that "the wise man should not elect as his authority the word of the Vedas, which is full of impurity, produces but scanty and transitory fruits and is limited."
Though many religious Hindus implicitly acknowledge the authority of the Vedas, this acknowledgment is often "no more than a declaration that someone considers himself a Hindu", and "most Indians today pay lip service to the Veda and have no regard for the contents of the text." Some Hindus challenge the authority of the Vedas, thereby implicitly acknowledging its importance to the history of Hinduism, states Lipner.
While Hindu reform movement such as Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj accept the authority of Vedas, Hindu modernists like Debendranath Tagore and Keshub Chandra Sen; and social reformers like B. R. Ambedkar reject its authority.
Western Indology
Further information: Sanskrit studiesThe study of Sanskrit in the West began in the 17th century. In the early 19th century, Arthur Schopenhauer drew attention to Vedic texts, specifically the Upanishads. The importance of Vedic Sanskrit for Indo-European studies was also recognized in the early 19th century. English translations of the Samhitas were published in the later 19th century, in the Sacred Books of the East series edited by Müller between 1879 and 1910. Ralph T. H. Griffith also presented English translations of the four Samhitas, published 1889 to 1899.
Rigveda manuscripts were selected for inscription in UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2007.
See also
Notes
- ^ It is certain that the hymns of the Rig Veda post-date Indo-Iranian separation of ca. 2000 BCE and probably that of the relevant Mitanni documents of c. 1400 BCE. The oldest available text is estimated to be from 1200 BCE. Philological estimates tend to date the bulk of the text to the second half of the second millennium:
- Max Müller: "the hymns of the Rig-Veda are said to date from 1500 B.C."
- The EIEC (s.v. Indo-Iranian languages, p. 306) gives 1500–1000 BCE.
- Flood and Witzel both mention c. 1500–1200 BCE.
- Anthony mentions c. 1500–1300 BCE.
- Thomas Oberlies (Die Religion des Rgveda, 1998, p. 158) based on 'cumulative evidence' sets a wide range of 1700–1100 BCE. Oberlies 1998, p. 155 gives an estimate of 1100 BCE for the youngest hymns in book 10.
- Witzel 1995, p. 4 mentions c. 1500–1200 BCE. According to Witzel 1997, p. 263, the whole Rig Vedic period may have lasted from c. 1900 BCE – c. 1200 BCE: "the bulk of the RV represents only 5 or 6 generations of kings (and of the contemporary poets)24 of the Pūru and Bharata tribes. It contains little else before and after this “snapshot” view of contemporary Rgvedic history, as reported by these contemporary “tape recordings.” On the other hand, the whole Rgvedic period may have lasted even up to 700 years, from the infiltration of the Indo-Aryans into the subcontinent, c. 1900 B.C. (at the utmost, the time of collapse of the Indus civilization), up to c. 1200 B.C., the time of the introduction of iron which is first mentioned in the clearly post-vedic hymns of the Atharvaveda."
- Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not deontic authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological epistemic authority by a Hindu orthodox school."Freschi 2012, p. 62 This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.
- For a table of all Vedic texts see Witzel 2003, pp. 100–101.
- The Vedic Sanskrit corpus is incorporated in A Vedic Word Concordance (Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa) prepared from 1930 under Vishva Bandhu, and published in five volumes in 1935–1965. Its scope extends to about 400 texts, including the entire Vedic Sanskrit corpus besides some "sub-Vedic" texts. Volume I: Samhitas, Volume II: Brahmanas and Aranyakas, Volume III: Upanishads, Volume IV: Vedangas; A revised edition, extending to about 1800 pages, was published in 1973–1976.
- ^ Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara's Introduction at Google Books to Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad at pp. 1–5: "The Vedas are divided in two parts, the first is the karma-kanda, the ceremonial part, also (called) purva-kanda, and treats on ceremonies; the second part is the jnana kanda, the part which contains knowledge, also named uttara-kanda or posterior part, and unfolds the knowledge of Brahma or the universal soul."
- "As a skilled craftsman makes a car, a singer I, Mighty One! this hymn for thee have fashioned. If thou, O Agni, God, accept it gladly, may we obtain thereby the heavenly Waters". – Rigveda 5.2.11, Translated by Ralph T.H. Griffith
- Gavin Flood sums up mainstream estimates, according to which the Rigveda was compiled from as early as 1500 BCE over a period of several centuries.
- Broo 2016, p. 92 quotes Harold G. Coward and K. Kunjunni Raja.
- Of the complete Veda, by pāțha-śālā (priestly schools), as distinguished from the transmission in the pūjā, the daily services.
- Several authors refer to the Chinese Buddhist Monk I-Tsing, who visited India in the 7th century to retrieve Buddhist texts and gave examples of mnemonic techniques used in India: "In India there are two traditional ways in which one can attain great intellectual power. Firstly by repeatedly committing to memory the intellect is developed; secondly the alphabet fixes (to) one's ideas. By this way, after a practice of ten days or a month, a student feels his thoughts rise like a fountain, and can commit to memory whatever he has heard once."
- Staal: "by far the more remarkable , not merely because it is characteristically Indian and unlike anything we find elsewhere, but also because it has led to scientific discoveries that are of enduring interest and from which the contemporary West still has much to learn." Schiffman (2012, p. 171), quoting Staal (1986, p. 27)
Staal argued that the ancient Indian grammarians, especially Pāṇini, had completely mastered methods of linguistic theory not rediscovered again until the 1950s and the applications of modern mathematical logic to linguistics by Noam Chomsky. (Chomsky himself has said that the first generative grammar in the modern sense was Panini's grammar). These early Indian methods allowed the construction of discrete, potentially infinite generative systems. Remarkably, these early linguistic systems were codified orally, though writing was then used to develop them in some way. The formal basis for Panini's methods involved the use of "auxiliary" markers, rediscovered in the 1930s by the logician Emil Post. - ^ Artha may also mean "goal, purpose or essence," depending on the context.
- ^ Klostermaier 2007, p. 55: "Kautas, a teacher mentioned in the Nirukta by Yāska (ca. 500 BCE), a work devoted to an etymology of Vedic words that were no longer understood by ordinary people, held that the word of the Veda was no longer perceived as meaningful "normal" speech but as a fixed sequence of sounds, whose meaning was obscure beyond recovery."
The tenth through twelfth volumes of the first Prapathaka of the Chandogya Upanishad (800-600 BCE) describe a legend about priests and it criticizes how they go about reciting verses and singing hymns without any idea what they mean or the divine principle they signify. - According to Holdrege, srotriyas (a group of male Brahmin reciters who are masters of sruti) "frequently do not understand what they recite" when reciting the Samhitas, merely preserving the sound of the text.
- Klostermaier: "Brahman, derived from the root bŗh = to grow, to become great, was originally identical with the Vedic word, that makes people prosper: words were the pricipan means to approach the gods who dwelled in a different sphere. It was not a big step from this notion of "reified speech-act" to that "of the speech-act being looked at implicitly and explicitly as a means to an end." Klostermaier 2007, p. 55 quotes Deshpande 1990, p. 4.
- Coward 2008, p. 114: "For the Mimamsa the ultimate reality is nothing other than the eternal words of the Vedas. They did not accept the existence of a single supreme creator god, who might have composed the Veda. According to the Mimamsa, gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. The power of the gods, then, is nothing other than the power of the mantras that name them."
- The early Buddhist texts are also generally believed to be of oral tradition, with the first Pali Canon written many centuries after the death of the Buddha.
- Literally, "the meaning of the Vedas made manifest."
- Sayana repeats Yaska; see interpretation of the Vedas.
- The Upanishads.
- Mookerji also refers to the Uśanā smriti (81-2), which "states that mastery of mere text of Veda is to be followed up by its meaning" by discussing the Vedanta. where-after they were able to engage in doscourses on the Vedas.
- For example,
Hymn 1.164.34, "What is the ultimate limit of the earth?", "What is the center of the universe?", "What is the semen of the cosmic horse?", "What is the ultimate source of human speech?"
Hymn 1.164.34, "Who gave blood, soul, spirit to the earth?", "How could the unstructured universe give origin to this structured world?"
Hymn 1.164.5, "Where does the sun hide in the night?", "Where do gods live?"
Hymn 1.164.6, "What, where is the unborn support for the born universe?";
Hymn 1.164.20 (a hymn that is widely cited in the Upanishads as the parable of the Body and the Soul): "Two birds with fair wings, inseparable companions; Have found refuge in the same sheltering tree. One incessantly eats from the fig tree; the other, not eating, just looks on.";
Sources: (a) Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, ISBN 978-0-595-26925-9, pp. 64–69;
Jan Gonda, A History of Indian Literature: Veda and Upanishads, Volume 1, Part 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2, pp. 134–135;
Rigveda Book 1, Hymn 164 Wikisource - Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not deontic authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological epistemic authority by a Hindu orthodox school." This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.
- Lipner quotes Brockington (1981), The sacred tread, p.5.
References
- ^ Witzel 2003, p. 69.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 37.
- "Construction of the Vedas". VedicGranth.Org. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 3 July 2020.
- "Veda". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary.
- Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed 8 April 2023)
- see e.g. Radhakrishnan & Moore 1957, p. 3; Witzel 2003, p. 68; MacDonell 2004, pp. 29–39.
- Sanskrit literature (2003) in Philip's Encyclopedia. Accessed 2007-08-09
- Sanujit Ghose (2011). "Religious Developments in Ancient India" in World History Encyclopedia.
- ^ Gavin Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0, pp. 35–39
- Bloomfield, M. The Atharvaveda and the Gopatha-Brahmana, (Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde II.1.b.) Strassburg 1899; Gonda, J. A history of Indian literature: I.1 Vedic literature (Samhitas and Brahmanas); I.2 The Ritual Sutras. Wiesbaden 1975, 1977
- ^ A Bhattacharya (2006), Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology, ISBN 978-0-595-38455-6, pp. 8–14; George M. Williams (2003), Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-533261-2, p. 285
- ^ Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2
- ^ Bhattacharya 2006, pp. 8–14.
- ^ Holdrege 1995, pp. 351–357.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 82.
- ^ Apte 1965, p. 887.
- ^ Apte 1965, "apauruSeya".
- ^ Sharma 2011, pp. 196–197.
- ^ Westerhoff 2009, p. 290.
- ^ Todd 2013, p. 128.
- ^ Pollock 2011, pp. 41–58.
- ^ Scharfe 2002, pp. 13–14.
- ^ Wood 2007.
- ^ Hexam 2011, p. chapter 8.
- ^ Dwyer 2013.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, p. 347.
- ^ "astika" and "nastika". Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 20 April 2016.
- ^ Monier-Williams 1899, p. 1015.
- Apte 1965, p. 856.
- see e.g. Pokorny's 1959 Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch s.v. u̯(e)id-²; Rix' Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben, u̯ei̯d-.
- Monier-Williams 1899, p. 1017 (2nd Column).
- Monier-Williams 1899, p. 1017 (3rd Column).
- according to ISKCON, Hindu Sacred Texts Archived 26 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine, "Hindus themselves often use the term to describe anything connected to the Vedas and their corollaries (e.g. Vedic culture)."
- Prasad 2020, p. 150.
- 37,575 are Rigvedic. Of the remaining, 34,857 appear in the other three Samhitas, and 16,405 are known only from Brahmanas, Upanishads or Sutras
- ^ Klostermaier 1994, pp. 67–69.
- ^ Brahmana Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)
- ^ Michael Witzel, "Tracing the Vedic dialects" in Dialectes dans les litteratures Indo-Aryennes ed. Caillat, Paris, 1989, 97–265.
- ^ Biswas et al (1989), Cosmic Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-34354-1, pp. 42–43
- ^ Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2, pp. 424–426
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 51.
- William K. Mahony (1998). The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination. State University of New York Press. p. 271. ISBN 978-0-7914-3579-3.
- ^ Wendy Doniger (1990), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, 1st Edition, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-61847-0, pp. 2–3; Quote: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."
- Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al.), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1080-6, p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";
Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, ISBN 978-1-59257-846-7, pp. 208–210 - Patrick Olivelle (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-535242-9, p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth , in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".
- Witzel 2003, pp. 100–101.
- Bartley 2001, p. 490.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, p. 30.
- ^ Nakamura 1983, p. 409.
- ^ Bhattacharya 2006, p. 9.
- ^ Knapp 2005, pp. 10–11.
- Seer of the Fifth Veda: Kr̥ṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa in the Mahābhārata Bruce M. Sullivan, Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 85–86
- "The Rig Veda". Wikisource.
- ^ Witzel 1995, p. 4.
- Anthony 2007, p. 49.
- Witzel 2008, p. 68.
- Frazier 2011, p. 344.
- Holdrege 2012, pp. 249, 250.
- Dalal 2014, p. 16.
- Dutt 2006, p. 36.
- ^ Anthony 2007, p. 454.
- ^ Oberlies 1998, p. 158.
- Kumar 2014, p. 179.
- Witzel 2003, p. 68.
- ^ Witzel 2003, p. 69; For oral composition and oral transmission for "many hundreds of years" before being written down, see: Avari 2007, p. 76.
- ^ Holdrege 1995, p. 344.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, p. 345.
- ^ Broo 2016, p. 92.
- Pruthi 2004, p. 286.
- Holdrege 2012, p. 165.
- Prasad 2007, p. 125.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, pp. 344–345.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, p. 345.
- Banerji 1989, pp. 323–324.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, pp. 477–495.
- Rath 2012, p. 22.
- ^ Griffiths 1999, p. 122.
- ^ Rath 2012, p. 19.
- Doniger 2010, p. 106.
- ^ Wilke & Moebus 2011, p. 479.
- Schiffman 2012, p. 171.
- An event in Kolkata Archived May 10, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Frontline
- Kadvany, John (2007). "Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion". Journal of Indian Philosophy. 35 (5–6): 487–520. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.565.2083. doi:10.1007/s10781-007-9025-5. S2CID 52885600.
- Galewicz 2004, p. 328.
- ^ Mookerji 2011, p. 35.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, p. 346.
- ^ Klostermaier 2007, p. 55.
- Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1468-4, pages 80-84
- Jackson 2016, p. "Sayana, Vidyaranya’s brother".
- Holdrege 1996, pp. 346–347.
- Holdrege 1996, pp. 346, 347.
- ^ Frazier 2011, p. 34.
- Donald S. Lopez Jr. (1995). "Authority and Orality in the Mahāyāna" (PDF). Numen. 42 (1): 21–47. doi:10.1163/1568527952598800. hdl:2027.42/43799. JSTOR 3270278.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, p. 192.
- Goody 1987.
- Lopez 2016, pp. 35–36.
- Olson & Cole 2013, p. 15.
- ^ Avari 2007, pp. 69–70, 76
- Brodd, Jeffrey (2003), World Religions, Winona, MN: Saint Mary's Press, ISBN 978-0-88489-725-5
- Jamison, Stephanie W.; Brereton, Joel P. (2014). The Rigveda – The Earliest Religious Poetry of India, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-19-972078-1.
- "Cultural Heritage of Nepal". Nepal-German Manuscript Preservation Project. University of Hamburg. Archived from the original on 18 September 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013.
- Frazier 2011, p. 34.
- Walton, Linda (2015). "Educational institutions" in The Cambridge World History Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-0-521-19074-9.
- Sukumar Dutt (1988) . Buddhist Monks And Monasteries of India: Their History And Contribution To Indian Culture. George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London. ISBN 81-208-0498-8. pp. 332–333
- Deshpande 1990, p. 33.
- Misra 2000, p. 49.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, p. 354.
- Jackson 2016, ch.3.
- Coward, Raja & Potter 1990, p. 106.
- ^ Mookerji 2011, p. 34.
- Mookerji 2011, p. 30.
- Holdrege 1996, pp. 355, 356–357.
- ^ Galewicz 2004, p. 40.
- Galewicz 2011, p. 338.
- Collins 2009, "237 Sayana".
- ^ Galewicz 2004, p. 41.
- Galewicz 2004, pp. 41–42.
- Michaels 2016, pp. 237–238.
- Mookerji 2011, pp. 29–31.
- Mookerji 2011, pp. 29, 34.
- See:
• Sanskrit English Dictionary University of Kloen, Germany (2009)
• Karl Potter (1998), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 4, ISBN 81-208-0310-8, Motilal Banarsidass, pp 610 (note 17) - Mookerji 2011, pp. 34–35.
- Mookerji 2011, pp. 35–36.
- Mookerji 2011, p. 36.
- ^ Mookerji 2011, p. 196.
- Mookerji 2011, p. 29.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 39.
- ^ Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu", Harvard University, in Witzel 1997, pp. 261–264
- ^ Jamison and Witzel (1992), Vedic Hinduism, Harvard University, p. 6
- ^ Stevenson, Jay (2000). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Eastern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Alpha Books. p. 46. ISBN 9780028638201.
- J. Muir (1872), Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and History of the People of India, their religion and institutions, Vol. 1 at Google Books, 2nd Edition, p. 12
- Albert Friedrich Weber, Indische Studien, herausg. von at Google Books, Vol. 10, pp. 1–9 with footnotes (in German); For a translation, Original Sanskrit Texts at Google Books, p. 14
- For an example, see Sarvānukramaṇī Vivaraṇa Univ of Pennsylvania rare texts collection
- R̥gveda-sarvānukramaṇī Śaunakakr̥tāʼnuvākānukramaṇī ca, Maharṣi-Kātyayāna-viracitā, OCLC 11549595
- Staal 1986
- ^ Filliozat 2004, p. 139
- Witzel 2003, p. 69, "... almost all printed editions depend on the late manuscripts that are hardly older than 500 years"
- Radhakrishnan & Moore 1957, p. 3; Witzel 2003, p. 68
- Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, pp. 257–348
- MacDonell 2004, pp. 29–39.
- Jamison and Witzel (1992), Vedic Hinduism, Harvard University, p. 21
- Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, p. 286
- ^
Original Sanskrit: Rigveda 10.129 Wikisource;
• Translation 1: Max Müller (1859). A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature. Williams and Norgate, London. pp. 559–565.
• Translation 2: Kenneth Kramer (1986). World Scriptures: An Introduction to Comparative Religions. Paulist Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8091-2781-8.
• Translation 3: David Christian (2011). Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. University of California Press. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-0-520-95067-2. - see e.g. Avari 2007, p. 77.
- For 1,028 hymns and 10,600 verses and division into ten mandalas, see: Avari 2007, p. 77.
- For characterization of content and mentions of deities including Agni, Indra, Varuna, Soma, Surya, etc. see: Avari 2007, p. 77.
- Witzel 1997, p. 261.
- Prasad 2020, pp. 150–151.
- Prasad 2020, p. 151.
- Original text translated in English: The Rig Veda, Mandala 10, Hymn 117, Ralph T.H. Griffith (Translator);
C Chatterjee (1995), Values in the Indian Ethos: An Overview, Journal of Human Values, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–12 - Michael Witzel, The Rigvedic religious system and its central Asian and Hindukush antecedents, in The Vedas – Texts, Language and Ritual, Editors: Griffiths and Houben (2004), Brill Academic, ISBN 978-90-6980-149-0, pp. 581–627
- From sāman, the term for a melody applied to a metrical hymn or a song of praise, Apte 1965, p. 981.
- ^ Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, pp. 269–270
- M Bloomfield, Rig-veda Repetitions, p. 402, at Google Books, pp. 402–464
- For 1875 total verses, see the numbering given in Ralph T. H. Griffith. Griffith's introduction mentions the recension history for his text. Repetitions may be found by consulting the cross-index in Griffith pp. 491–499.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, p. 381.
- ^ Witzel 2003, pp. 76–77.
- The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools, Michael Witzel, Harvard University
- Autochthonous Aryans? Michael Witzel, Harvard University
- Early Sanskritization Archived 20 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Michael Witzel, Harvard University
- Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, ISBN 978-0-595-26925-9, pp. 273–274
- Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, pp. 270–271
- Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, pp. 272–274
- Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1468-4, pp. 217–219
- Michaels 2004, p. 52 Table 3.
- CL Prabhakar (1972), The Recensions of the Sukla Yajurveda, Archiv Orientální, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp. 347–353
- Paul Deussen, The Philosophy of the Upanishads, Motilal Banarsidass (2011 Edition), ISBN 978-81-208-1620-6, p. 23
- Patrick Olivelle (1998), Upaniṣhads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-282292-6, pp. 1–17
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 56.
- Frits Staal (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, ISBN 978-0-14-309986-4, pp. 136–137
- Frits Staal (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, ISBN 978-0-14-309986-4, p. 135
- Alex Wayman (1997), Untying the Knots in Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1321-2, pp. 52–53
- "The latest of the four Vedas, the Atharva-Veda, is, as we have seen, largely composed of magical texts and charms, but here and there we find cosmological hymns which anticipate the Upanishads, – hymns to Skambha, the 'Support', who is seen as the first principle which is both the material and efficient cause of the universe, to Prāna, the 'Breath of Life', to Vāc, the 'Word', and so on." Zaehner 1966, p. vii.
- Laurie Patton (2004), Veda and Upanishad, in The Hindu World (Editors: Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby), Routledge, ISBN 0-415-21527-7, p. 38
- ^ Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas, Vol 1, Fasc. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2, pp. 277–280, Quote: "It would be incorrect to describe the Atharvaveda Samhita as a collection of magical formulas".
- Kenneth Zysk (2012), Understanding Mantras (Editor: Harvey Alper), Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0746-4, pp. 123–129
- On magic spells and charms, such as those to gain better health: Atharva Veda 2.32 Bhaishagykni, Charm to secure perfect health Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; see also chapters 3.11, 3.31, 4.10, 5.30, 19.26;
On finding a good husband: Atharva Veda 4.2.36 Strijaratani Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; Atharvaveda dedicates over 30 chapters to love relationships, sexuality and for conceiving a child, see e.g. chapters 1.14, 2.30, 3.25, 6.60, 6.78, 6.82, 6.130–6.132; On peaceful social and family relationships: Atharva Veda 6.3.30 Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; - Kenneth Zysk (1993), Religious Medicine: The History and Evolution of Indian Medicine, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-56000-076-1, pp. x–xii
- Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" in Witzel 1997, pp. 275–276
- Moriz Winternitz (2010), A History of Indian Literature, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0264-3, pp. 175–176
- Klostermaier 1994, p. 67.
- ^ Max Müller, Chandogya Upanishad, The Upanishads, Part I, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvii with footnote 2
- Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1468-4, p. 63
- The Development of the Female Mind in India, p. 27, at Google Books, The Calcutta Review, Volume 60, p. 27
- Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2, pp. 319–322, 368–383 with footnotes
- AB Keith (2007), The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0644-3, pp. 489–490
- Max Müller, The Upanishads, Part 1, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvi footnote 1
- Olivelle 1998, p. liii.
- ^ Olivelle 1998, p. lv.
- Mahadevan 1952, p. 59.
- ^ PT Raju (1985), Structural Depths of Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-88706-139-4, pp. 35–36
- Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1080-6, p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";
Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, ISBN 978-1-59257-846-7, pp. 208–210 - Patrick Olivelle (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-535242-9, p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth , in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".
- "Sound and meaning of Veda". 11 September 2022.
- ^ Olivelle 1999, p. xxiii.
- James Lochtefeld (2002), "Vedanga" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1, pp. 744–745
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, pp. 391–394 with footnotes, 416–419.
- Coward, Raja & Potter 1990, pp. 105–110.
- Eggeling, Hans Julius (1911). "Hinduism" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 501–513, see page 505.
- Wilke & Moebus 2011, pp. 472–532.
- Coward, Raja & Potter 1990, p. 18.
- Rajendra Prasad (2009). A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals. Concept. p. 147. ISBN 978-81-8069-595-7.
- BR Modak, The Ancillary Literature of the Atharva-Veda, New Delhi, Rashtriya Veda Vidya Pratishthan, 1993, ISBN 81-215-0607-7
- Monier-Williams 1899, p. 207.
- Apte 1965, p. 293.
- "Upaveda". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
- Narayanaswamy, V. (1981). "Origin and Development of Ayurveda: A Brief History". Ancient Science of Life. 1 (1): 1–7. PMC 3336651. PMID 22556454.
- Frawley, David; Ranade, Subhash (2001). Ayurveda, Nature's Medicine. Lotus Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-914955-95-5. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- Paul Kuritz (1988), The Making of Theatre History, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-547861-5, p. 68
- Sullivan 1994, p. 385.
- Sanskrit original: Chandogya Upanishad, Wikisource;
• English translation: Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.2, G Jha (Translator), Oriental Book Agency, p. 368 - "Natyashastra" (PDF). Sanskrit Documents.
- Coormaraswamy and Duggirala (1917). The Mirror of Gesture. Harvard University Press. pp. 2–4.
- ^ John Carman (1989), The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the Tiruvaymoli, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-09305-5, pp. 259–261
- Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, ISBN 978-0-87249-965-2, pp. 43, 117–119
- Goswami, Satsvarupa (1976), Readings in Vedic Literature: The Tradition Speaks for Itself, S.l.: Assoc Publishing Group, p. 240, ISBN 978-0-912776-88-0
- ^ Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-17281-3, pp. 437–439
- Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-02522-5, pp. 1–5, 12–21
- Nair, Shantha N. (2008). Echoes of Ancient Indian Wisdom: The Universal Hindu Vision and Its Edifice. Hindology Books. p. 266. ISBN 978-81-223-1020-7.
- Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-02522-5, pp. 12–13, 134–156, 203–210
- Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-17281-3, pp. 442–443
- Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-20778-3, p. xxxix
- Thompson, Richard L. (2007). The Cosmology of the Bhagavata Purana 'Mysteries of the Sacred Universe. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-208-1919-1.
- Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-20778-3, p. xli
- BN Krishnamurti Sharma (2008), A History of the Dvaita School of Vedānta and Its Literature, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1575-9, pp. 128–131
- Chakravarty, Pradeep (18 October 2016). "Vedic route to the past". The Hindu.
- Kamil Zvelebil (1974). Tamil Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 49. ISBN 978-3-447-01582-0.
- "Ettuthokai – Puranānūru 201-400". 14 December 2014.
- JV Chelliah 1946, p. 41.
- JV Chelliah 1946, pp. 98–99.
- JV Chelliah 1946, pp. 98–100.
- Badami, Zahira. "Pattupattu Ten Tamil Idylls Chelliah J. V." Internet Archive.
- Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, ISBN 978-0-87249-965-2, p. 194
- Freschi 2012, p. 62.
- Young, Mary (2014). The Baul Tradition: Sahaj Vision East and West, pp. 27-36. SCB Distributors.
- Dyczkowski, Mark S. G. (1988). The Canon of the Saivagama and the Kubjika: Tantras of the Western Kaula Tradition, p. 9. SUNY Press.
- Lipner 2012, p. 16.
- Axel Michaels (2004), Hinduism: Past and Present, Princeton University Press, p.18; see also Julius Lipner (2012), Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, Routledge, p.77; and Brian K. Smith (2008), Hinduism, p.101, in Jacob Neusner (ed.), Sacred Texts and Authority, Wipf and Stock Publishers.
- Lipner 2012, pp. 15–17.
- Muhammad Khalid Masud (2000). Travellers in Faith: Studies of the Tablīghī Jamāʻat as a Transnational Islamic Movement for Faith Renewal. BRILL. p. 50. ISBN 978-90-04-11622-1.
- Rambachan 1994, p. 272.
- Nagappa 2011, p. 283 ("It is said that the Varna system Sanatan Hindu").
- Müller, Friedrich Max (author) & Stone, Jon R. (author, editor) (2002). The essential Max Müller: on language, mythology, and religion. Illustrated edition. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-29309-3. Source: (accessed: Friday May 7, 2010), p. 44
- "Rig Veda in UNESCO Memory of the World Register". Archived from the original on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 30 September 2011.
- Müller 1892.
- Oberlies 1998, p. 155.
Sources
- Anthony, David W. (2007), The Horse The Wheel And Language. How Bronze-Age Riders From the Eurasian Steppes Shaped The Modern World, Princeton University Press
- Apte, Vaman Shivaram (1965), The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary (4th revised & enlarged ed.), Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0567-5 Search
- Avari, Burjor (2007), India: The Ancient Past, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-35616-9
- Banerji, Sures Chandra (1989), A Companion to Sanskrit Literature, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0063-2
- Bartley, Christ (2001), "Shankara", in Leaman, Oliver (ed.), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-4151-7281-3
- Bhattacharya, Ashim (2006), Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology, iUniverse, ISBN 978-0-595-38455-6
- Broo, Mans (2016), "Rites of Burial and Immersion: Hindu Ritual practices on Disposing of Sacred Texts in Vrindavan", in Myrvold, Kristina (ed.), The Death of Sacred Texts: Ritual Disposal and Renovation of Texts in World Religions, Routledge
- Buswell, Robert E.; Lopez, Donald S. Jr., eds. (2013), "Nālandā", The Princeton dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8
- JV Chelliah (1946). Pattupattu – Ten Tamil Idylls (Tamil Verses with Englilsh Translation). Tamil University (1985 print).
- Collins, Randall (2009), The Sociology of Philosophies, Harvard University Press
- Coward, Harold G.; Raja, K. Kunjunni; Potter, Karl, eds. (1990). Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 5: The Philosophy of the Grammarians. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-81-208-0426-5.
- Coward, Harold (2008). The perfectibility of human nature in eastern and western thought. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7336-8.
- Dalal, Roshen (2014), The Vedas: An Introduction to Hinduism's Sacred Texts, Penguin UK, ISBN 978-81-8475-763-7
- Deshpande, Madhav M. (1990), "Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical Sounds", The Adyar Library Bulleting, archived from the original on 1 August 2020, retrieved 7 June 2020
- Doniger, Wendy (2010), The Hindus: An Alternative History, Oxford University Press
- Dutt, Sagarika (2006), India in a Globalized World, Manchester University Press, ISBN 978-1-84779-607-3
- Dwyer, Rachel (2013), What Do Hindus Believe?, Granta Books, ISBN 978-1-84708-940-3
- Filliozat, Pierre-Sylvain (2004), "Ancient Sanskrit Mathematics: An Oral Tradition and a Written Literature", in Chemla, Karine; Cohen, Robert S.; Renn, Jürgen; et al. (eds.), History of Science, History of Text (Boston Series in the Philosophy of Science), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 137–157, doi:10.1007/1-4020-2321-9_7, ISBN 978-1-4020-2320-0
- Flood, Gavin (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0
- Flood, Gavin, ed. (2003), The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism, Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, ISBN 978-1-4051-3251-0
- Flood, Gavin, ed. (2008), The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-4709-9868-7
- Frazier, Jessica, ed. (2011), The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies, London: Continuum, ISBN 978-0-8264-9966-0
- Freschi, Elisa (2012), Duty, Language and Exegesis in Prabhakara Mimamsa, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-22260-1
- Galewicz, Cezary (2004), "Changing Canons: What did Sayana think he commented upon", in Balcerowicz, Piotr; Mejor, Marek (eds.), Essays in Indian Philosophy, Religion and Literature, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
- Galewicz, Cezary (2011), "Why Should the Flower of Dharma be Invisible? Sayana's Vision of the Unity of the Veda", in Squarcini, Federico (ed.), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia, Anthem Press
- Goody (1987), The interface between the written and the oral, Cambridge University Press
- Griffiths, Paul J. (1999), Religious Reading: The Place of Reading in the Practice of Religion, Oxford University Press
- Hexam, Irving (2011), Understanding World Religions: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press, ISBN 978-0-310-31448-6
- Holdrege, Barbara A. (1995), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1640-2
- Holdrege, Barbara A. (1996), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1639-6
- Holdrege, Barbara A. (2012), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-1-4384-0695-4
- Jackson, W.J (2016), Vijayanagara Voices: Exploring South Indian History and Hindu Literature, Routledge
- Kumar, Jay (2014), "Ayurveda and Early Indian Medicine", in Johnston, Lucas F.; Bauman, Whitney (eds.), Science and Religion: One Planet, Many Possibilities, Routledge
- Klostermaier, Klaus (1994), A Survey of Hinduism (second ed.), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2109-3
- Klostermaier, Klaus (2007), A Survey of Hinduism (third ed.), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4
- Knapp, Stephen (2005), The Heart of Hinduism: The Eastern Path to Freedom, Empowerment and Illumination, iUniverse, ISBN 978-0-595-35075-9
- Lipner, Julius (2012), Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-135-24060-8
- Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2016), Elaborations on Emptiness: Uses of the Heart Sūtra, Princeton University Press
- MacDonell, Arthur Anthony (2004). A Practical Sanskrit Dictionary. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-2000-5.
- Mahadevan, T.M.P (1952), Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan; Ardeshir Ruttonji Wadia; Dhirendra Mohan Datta (eds.), History of Philosophy, Eastern and Western, George Allen & Unwin, OCLC 929704391
- Michaels, Axel (2004), Hinduism: Past and Present, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-08953-9
- Michaels, Axel (2016). Homo Ritualis: Hindu Ritual and Its Significance for Ritual Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026263-1.
- Misra, Kamal K. (2000), Textbook of Anthropological Linguistics, Concept Publishing Company
- Monier-Williams, Monier (1899). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 685239912.
- Mookerji, R. (2011) , Ancient Indian Education: Brahmanical and Buddhist, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN 978-81-208-0423-4
- Müller, Max (1892), ('Veda and Vedanta'), 7th lecture in India: What Can It Teach Us: A Course of Lectures Delivered Before the University of Cambridge
- Nagappa, Gowda K. (2011), The Bhagavadgita in the Nationalist Discourse, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-908847-8
- Nakamura, Hajime (1983), A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy, part 2, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
- Oberlies, Thomas (1998), Die Religion des Rgveda: Kompositionsanalyse der Soma-Hymnen des R̥gveda, Wien: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien
- Olivelle, Patrick (1998) , Upanișads. A New Translation by Patrick Olivelle, Oxford's World Classics, ISBN 978-0-19-954025-9
- Olivelle, Patrick (1999). Dharmasutras: The Law Codes of Ancient India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-283882-7.
- Olson, David R.; Cole, Michael (2013), Technology, Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: Implications of the Work of Jack Goody, Psychology Press
- Pollock, Sheldon (2011), Squarcini, Federico (ed.), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia, Anthem, ISBN 978-0-85728-430-3
- Prasad, Leela (2007), Poetics of conduct : oral narrative and moral being in a South Indian town, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-13921-2
- Prasad, R.U.S. (2020), The Rig-Vedic and Post-Rig-Vedic Polity (1500 BCE-500 BCE), Vernon Press
- Pruthi, R.K (2004), Vedic Civilisation, Discovery Publishing, ISBN 81-7141-875-9
- Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli; Moore, Charles A., eds. (1957), A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy (12th Princeton Paperback ed.), Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-01958-1
- Rambachan, Anantanand (1994), "Redefining the authority of scripture: The rejection of Vedic infallibility by Brahmo Samaj", in Patton, Laurie L. (ed.), Authority, Anxiety, and Canon: Essays in Vedic Interpretation, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1938-0
- Rath, Saraju (2012), Aspects of Manuscript Culture in South India, Leiden: Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-21900-7
- Scharfe, Hartmut (2002), Handbook of Oriental Studies, Brill Academic, ISBN 978-90-04-12556-8
- Schiffman, Harold (2012), Linguistic Culture and Language Policy, Routledge
- Sharma, D. (2011), Classical Indian Philosophy: A Reader, Columbia University Press
- Staal, Frits (1986), The Fidelity of Oral Tradition and the Origins of Science, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie voor Wetenschappen, North Holland Publishing Company
- Sullivan, B. M. (Summer 1994), "The Religious Authority of the Mahabharata: Vyasa and Brahma in the Hindu Scriptural Tradition", Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 62 (1): 377–401, doi:10.1093/jaarel/LXII.2.377
- Todd, Warren Lee (2013), The Ethics of Śaṅkara and Śāntideva: A Selfless Response to an Illusory World, Ashgate, ISBN 978-1-4094-6681-9
- Westerhoff, Jan (2009), Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-538496-3
- Wilke, Annette; Moebus, Oliver (2011), Sound and Communication: An Aesthetic Cultural History of Sanskrit Hinduism, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-018159-3
- Witzel, Michael (1995), "Early Sanskritization: Origin and Development of the Kuru state" (PDF), EJVS, 1 (4), archived from the original (PDF) on 20 February 2012
- Witzel, Michael (1997), "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu" (PDF), in Witzel, Michael (ed.), Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts: New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas, Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora; vol. 2, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
- Witzel, Michael. "Vedas and Upaniṣads". In Flood (2003).
- Witzel, Michael. "Vedas and Upaniṣads". In Flood (2008).
- Wood, Michael (2007), The Story of India Hardcover, BBC Worldwide, ISBN 978-0-563-53915-5
- Zaehner, R. C. (1966), Hindu Scriptures, Everyman's Library, London: J. M. Dent
Further reading
- Overviews
- Gonda, J. (1975), Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas, vol. 1, Veda and Upanishads, Wiesnaden: Harrassowitz: A History of Indian literature, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2.
- Santucci, J.A. (1976), "An Outline of Vedic Literature", Scholars Press for the American Academy of Religion.
- Shrava, S. (1977), A Comprehensive History of Vedic Literature – Brahmana and Aranyaka Works, Pranava Prakashan.
- A Vedic Concordance, (an alphabetic index to every line, every stanza of the Vedas published before 1906), Harvard University: Maurice Bloomfield, 1906
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: others (link). - The Vedas at sacred-texts.com, Sacred Texts.
- Concordances
- Bloomfield, M. (1907), A Vedic Concordance.
- Bandhu, Vishva; Dev, Bhim (1963), Bhaskaran Nair, S. (ed.), Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa: A Vedic Word-Concordance, Hoshiarpur: Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute.
- An Enlarged Electronic Version of Bloomfield's A Vedic Concordance, Harvard University Press.
- Conference proceedings
- Griffiths, Arlo (2004), Houben, Jan E.M. (ed.), The Vedas : texts, language & ritual: proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop, Leiden 2002, Groningen : Forsten: Groningen Oriental Studies 20, ISBN 90-6980-149-3.
- Michael, Witzel, On the History and the Present State of Vedic Tradition in Nepal (PDF).
- Journals
- Arnold, Edward Vernon (1897), "Sketch of the Historical Grammar of the Rig and Atharva Vedas", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 18: 203–353, doi:10.2307/592303, ISSN 0003-0279, JSTOR 592303.
External links
- "GRETIL etexts", Goettingen.
- Vedas, Curlie
Hinduism topics | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Philosophy |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Texts |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Deities |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Practices |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Related | |||||||||||||||||||
Outline |
Religious texts (List) | |
---|---|
Antiquity |
|
Medieval |
|
Early modern |
|
Modern |
|