| Revision as of 09:03, 24 August 2007 editGavin.collins (talk | contribs)18,503 edits Add to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:19, 8 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. ]<small>]</small> 23:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{ns:0|O}} | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
| :{{la|PERI GmbH}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|PERI GmbH}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| No indication of notability through third-party sources. I was wary about speedying it outright, so seeking opinions of others. ] (]) 08:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | No indication of notability through third-party sources. I was wary about speedying it outright, so seeking opinions of others. ] (]) 08:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Week Keep''' Can't see any justification for speedy - asserts notability. Seems a reasonably big multinational looking at Google (PERI US, PERI UK, PERI DE etc.), but wether we can get any ] is different - I would assume there must be some trade reviews that could be used as references but couldn't see any in a quick search. Agree with the advert tag, and needs a re-write, but it does seem to pass ].<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 08:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | *'''Week Keep''' Can't see any justification for speedy - asserts notability. Seems a reasonably big multinational looking at Google (PERI US, PERI UK, PERI DE etc.), but wether we can get any ] is different - I would assume there must be some trade reviews that could be used as references but couldn't see any in a quick search. Agree with the advert tag, and needs a re-write, but it does seem to pass ].<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 08:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::'''keep''' | |||
| ::hello hello, | |||
| ::I am engineer, | ::hello hello, I am engineer, | ||
| ::let give you a crash course in companies within the construction industry | ::let give you a crash course in companies within the construction industry | ||
| ::If we were to compare the automotive industry with the construction industry | ::If we were to compare the automotive industry with the construction industry | ||
| ::Then ] would be as to ], as ] as to ]. | ::Then ] would be as to ], as ] as to ]. | ||
| ::I see no reason why this article should be deleted or the article ] (leading american formwork company) If anything maybe this article should be reviewed by a third party. If all construction company articles should be deleted then I call for |
::I see no reason why this article should be deleted or the article ] (leading american formwork company) If anything maybe this article should be reviewed by a third party. If all construction company articles should be deleted then I call for all automotive companies to be treated in the same way. | ||
| ::--] 08:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ::--] 08:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 09:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 09:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' source and clean up to make it sound less like an ad. This is an undoubtedly notable company. <b>]</b> 12:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''', weakly, but rewrite for NPOV and remove all ]. Passages like: | |||
| ::''The ACS (Automatic Climbing System) was PERI's milestone in self-climbing technology. It is used to form high buildings without a crane. At the beginning of the 80s, PERI was at the forefront of using aluminium in the construction business. This trend soon won over sceptics as people on the job sites quickly realized that a 20% weight reduction is a big advantage, because striking has to be done by hand after concreting'' | |||
| :need to be rewritten and reference, even if it contains worthwhile facts. - ] 14:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' Major global company in its field. ] 14:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I think it is a obvious decision, | |||
| I will remove the deletion tag from the article | |||
| --] 13:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Speedy Delete''' as nominated by ]. I checked out this article on the German version of Misplaced Pages to see if independent references had been provided in the hope they had been lost in transation to the English edition, but was disapointed to see none and that exactly the same article has been replicated. Without independent evidence of notability (which links to the company's own websites are not), I would recomend speedy deletion on grounds that the ] marks this as a public relations exercise designed to promote the company (in at least 2 languages), and as such fails ] prohibition. --] 15:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 14:19, 8 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. CitiCat 23:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
PERI GmbH
No indication of notability through third-party sources. I was wary about speedying it outright, so seeking opinions of others. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Week Keep Can't see any justification for speedy - asserts notability. Seems a reasonably big multinational looking at Google (PERI US, PERI UK, PERI DE etc.), but wether we can get any independent sources is different - I would assume there must be some trade reviews that could be used as references but couldn't see any in a quick search. Agree with the advert tag, and needs a re-write, but it does seem to pass WP:N.Pedro | Chat 08:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- keep
- hello hello, I am engineer,
- let give you a crash course in companies within the construction industry
- If we were to compare the automotive industry with the construction industry
- Then Ford Motor Company would be as to Automobile, as PERI GmbH as to Formwork.
- I see no reason why this article should be deleted or the article EFCO Corp. (leading american formwork company) If anything maybe this article should be reviewed by a third party. If all construction company articles should be deleted then I call for all automotive companies to be treated in the same way.
- --Lumber Jack 08:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 09:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--
- Keep source and clean up to make it sound less like an ad. This is an undoubtedly notable company. ELIMINATORJR 12:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, weakly, but rewrite for NPOV and remove all peacock terms. Passages like:
- The ACS (Automatic Climbing System) was PERI's milestone in self-climbing technology. It is used to form high buildings without a crane. At the beginning of the 80s, PERI was at the forefront of using aluminium in the construction business. This trend soon won over sceptics as people on the job sites quickly realized that a 20% weight reduction is a big advantage, because striking has to be done by hand after concreting
- need to be rewritten and reference, even if it contains worthwhile facts. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Major global company in its field. Golfcam 14:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think it is a obvious decision,
I will remove the deletion tag from the article --Lumber Jack 13:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as nominated by SchuminWeb. I checked out this article on the German version of Misplaced Pages to see if independent references had been provided in the hope they had been lost in transation to the English edition, but was disapointed to see none and that exactly the same article has been replicated. Without independent evidence of notability (which links to the company's own websites are not), I would recomend speedy deletion on grounds that the Peacock language marks this as a public relations exercise designed to promote the company (in at least 2 languages), and as such fails WP:NOSPAM prohibition. --Gavin Collins 15:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.