Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/SK Holdings: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:39, 24 August 2007 editGavin.collins (talk | contribs)18,503 edits Add to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:21, 25 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,844 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (6x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(25 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''merge all''' into ]. - ]] 06:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}}


:{{la|SK Holdings}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|SK Holdings}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 12: Line 19:


] 09:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC) ] 09:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge all''' to ] and check for COI. <span style="border:1px solid #800000;">]</font>]]</span> 09:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC) *'''Merge all''' to ] and check for COI. <span style="border:1px solid #800000;">]</span>]]</span> 09:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 09:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 09:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 10:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Merge all''' per ]. ] 10:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge all''' per above. Note that such a remedy will make ] useless, and that should be '''deleted'''. ] 11:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment'''. ] and ] now nominated for deletion. <span style="border:1px solid #800000;">]</span>]]</span> 11:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
***I've closed both of these discussions. We do not need to have this discussion in three places. '''''×'''''] 15:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' There is every reason to create separate articles when the companies are individually notable in their sectors, as it facilitates accurate categorisation. The fact that one person has had to create all these articles is a manifestation of systemic bias. The SK Group is a $75.8 billion entity ranked 98th on the ], making it larger than many American groups with bucketfuls of articles. ] 12:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*Weak '''keep''' if thoroughly cleaned up, and '''merge all''' to ]. This is apparently a group of businesses traded on a major stock exchange, which would appear to meet ]. But the quality of the prose is absolutely vile: ''With Korea’s largest market share in both sectors, SK is emerging as an enterprise leader in the global marketplace.'' - ] 13:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
:*I have edited the text on ] to remove some of the worst offenses in language; see ] for some of the stuff I removed. - ] 14:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep all''' How on earth can the nominator think one of the world's largest companies fails ]? ] 14:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' - the subjects are notable, however if the articles were redirected towards the group article for now, we wouldn't be losing much sourced content. ] 17:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge all until secondary sources are included and COI removed''' per Dbromage. ] 17:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' as ]. Articles are woefully small, and it smacks of spam. Also, have a word with the creator! ] 17:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Separate articles may attract contributions from readers with interests in different business sectors, and are necessary for categorisation purposes. ] 19:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' These are all multi-billion dollar companies, and there is no rule against articles about subsidiary companies, which are very common. ] 23:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment'''. Notability is not in question here. <span style="border:1px solid #800000;">]</span>]]</span> 23:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge All''' on grounds of non-notability ] per ]. Subsidiary companies do not have any notabilty in their own right, and should be merged into ], a stock exchange listed company. The alternative is to give the green light to the creation of lots of other non-notable subsidiary artices such as SK Pizzas, SK Dry Cleaners, and SK Realtors etc etc. --] 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 17:21, 25 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge all into SK Group. - KrakatoaKatie 06:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

SK Holdings

SK Holdings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article fails WP:CORP, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article appears to heavily maintained by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than to SK Related Articles. There is no reason for the creation multiple stub articles when they can be merged into the main Article SK Group.

I am also nominating the following related be merged or deleted for the same:

Hu12 09:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.