Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Claudia Newman: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:53, 17 June 2005 editMARMOT (talk | contribs)161 edits →[]← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:53, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br>The result of the debate was '''DELETE''' ] &mdash; ] | ] 05:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===


Line 46: Line 48:


*'' "Keep" '' ] 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) *'' "Keep" '' ] 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
**Note: This is the same user who proposed the policy "Administrators can't vote" ] | ] | ] 16:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''<span style="color:red;">Please do not edit this page</span>'''.'' </div>

Latest revision as of 02:53, 6 February 2023

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 05:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Claudia Newman

Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • There is a URL from a news site linked in the article that proves that the story is completely false. The name does not even match that of the article.
  • Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambi 10:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete -- Could the spammer please stop? RussellG 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • There is no basis for that claim.
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 10:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • The article you linked to yourself disproves your article.
Unsigned comment above from RussellG -- Longhair | Talk 11:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • It most certainly does not
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Sign your posts people. After your comment, use four of these ~~~~ -- Longhair | Talk 11:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I see no evidence it disproves it (JoJo)
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comment: CzechPartisan's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Quite so, no need to get snarky. Given your reasoning thus far it seems this is only a popularity contest anyway. Go whine to the T-man about it. 'JoJo 13:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
  • Strong delete, as soon as possible. Also, votes by sockpuppets shouldn't be counted. Columbia 13:54, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, they called you a sock puppet! Not like your votes which we must assume as legit... 'JoJo 13:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo' Keep Matthewleung87 14:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep Jamesss 14:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Sockpuppets Proto 14:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • DeleteLectonar 14:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Nonsense. --Habap 15:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax. Alphax  15:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I sense... a great disturbance... in sockpuppets. Delete. jglc | t | c 15:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nice cleavage — unconfirmed; no google match; likely hoax. — RJH 15:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • "Above photo of offending material" - heh. -- Jonel | Speak 02:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax, nothing in the news article supports what is said here. --Etacar11 16:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete if the article makes anyone notable, it's the girl, not her "mother". Septentrionalis 18:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete sock supported hoax. Capitalistroadster 01:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Strongest Keep having spoken to some friends of mine, they assure me this is worth keeping. I agree wholeheartedly- 'Hotpants 07:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'

    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • okay, keep, but only because of the tits. Last one, geez 'TagTeam 07:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --FCYTravis 09:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep- very good form, and lack of a persuasive argument that it is fiction- 'Freezer 10:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
  • Delete - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - Skysmith 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- 'TagTeam 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'

  • "Keep" MARMOT 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Note: This is the same user who proposed the policy "Administrators can't vote" jglc | t | c 16:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.