Misplaced Pages

Template:FAR-instructions: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:22, 25 August 2007 editThedemonhog (talk | contribs)12,045 editsm fix← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:10, 25 July 2023 edit undoIznoRepeat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,076 editsm →top: phab:T337149#8953569, replaced: [// → [https://Tag: AWB 
(109 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="clear:both; background:none;"
{| {|
| width="60%" style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF" valign="top"| | style="background: #e6f2ff; border: 1px solid #a3b1bf; padding: 0.5em 1em; vertical-align: top; width: 70%;"|
⚫ <span style="font-size:16pt">Reviewing featured articles</span> {{shortcut|]|WP:FARC}}


⚫ <span style="font-size: 16pt;">Reviewing featured articles</span> {{shortcut|WP:FAR|WP:FARC}}
⚫ This page is for the review and improvement of ] that may no longer meet the ]. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted.


⚫ This page is for the review and improvement of ] (FAs) that may no longer meet the ]. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted.
⚫ There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.


⚫ There are three requisite stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.
⚫ '''Featured article review''' (FAR)
*Here, issues are raised and proposed improvements discussed without declarations of "keep" or "remove". When listing, a nominator must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and may propose remedies. The ideal outcome is that the issues are addressed and the review is closed at this stage without a change in status. Nominations should be made with the goal of improvement rather than removal.
*Reviews are intended to facilitate a range of improvements to featured articles, from updating and light editing—including the checking of references and their formatting—to the addressing of more complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness and neutrality.
⚫ *The featured article director, ], or his delegates ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and, thus, that the nomination should be moved to the second stage.


'''Featured article removal candidate''' (FARC) '''1. Raise issues at the article's talk page'''
* In this step, concerned editors attempt to directly resolve issues with the existing community of article editors, and to informally improve the article. Concerned editors should '''give article watchers two to three weeks to respond''' to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to ], and removed from there once posted here).
⚫ *An article is never listed as a removal candidate without first undergoing a review. In this second stage, participants may declare "keep" or "remove", supported by substantive comments, and further time is provided to overcome deficiencies.
⚫ *Reviewers who declare "remove" should be prepared to return towards the end of the process to strike out their objections if they have been addressed.
⚫ *The featured article director or his delegates determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.


⚫ '''2. Featured article review (FAR)'''
⚫ Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.
* In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". The aim is to improve articles rather than to demote them. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status.
* Reviews can improve articles in various ways: articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
⚫ * The featured article review coordinators—], ], and ]—determine either that there is consensus to close during this second stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and so therefore the nomination should be moved to the third stage.


'''3. Featured article removal candidate (FARC)'''
Older reviews are stored in the ].
⚫ * An article is never listed as a removal candidate without first undergoing a review. In this third stage, participants may declare "keep" or "delist", supported by substantive comments, and further time is provided to overcome deficiencies.
⚫ * Reviewers who declare "delist" should be prepared to return towards the end of the process to strike out their objections if they have been addressed.
⚫ * The featured article review coordinators determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.


⚫ The FAR and FARC stages typically last two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.
:''''

| valign="top" style="padding:1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF" |
To contact the FAR coordinators, please leave a message on the ], or use the {{tl|@FAR}} ] template elsewhere.
{{fapages}}

Urgent reviews are listed ]. Older reviews are stored in the ]. <!--A ] after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the <kbd><nowiki>{{FAR}}</nowiki></kbd> template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates <kbd><nowiki>{{articlehistory}}</nowiki></kbd>.-->

<small>]</small>&nbsp;– <small>This page:</small> {{purge|<small>Purge cache</small>}}, ], ], ]
| style="background: #e6f2ff; border: 1px solid #a3b1bf; padding: 0.5em 1em; vertical-align: top;" |
{{FApages}}
|- |-
| colspan="2" style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#F5FAFF" valign="top"| | colspan="2" style="background: #f5faff; border: 1px solid #a3b1bf; padding:0.5em 1em;" |


<span style="font-size:15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</span></b> <span style="font-size: 15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</b></span>


The number of FARs that can be placed on the page is limited as follows:
⚫ Nominators typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time, should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
# No more than one nomination per week by the same nominator.
# Place <nowiki>{{FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".
# No more than five nominations by the same nominator on the page at one time, unless permission for more is given by a FAR coordinator.
#:Note: if an article has already been through the FAR/C process, use the Move button to rename the previous nomination to an archive. For example, Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Television → Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Television/archive1
⚫ Nominators are strongly encouraged to assist in the process of improvement; they should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days) and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
# From there, click on the "add a comment" link.
# '''Before nomination, raise issues at talk page of the article'''. Attempt to directly resolve issues with the existing community of article editors, and '''to informally improve the article over at least a two-week period. Articles in this step are not listed on this page'''.
# Place <nowiki> ===]=== </nowiki> at the top of the subpage.
# Below this title, write your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the ] that are at issue. Click on "Save page". # Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Publish changes".
# From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; please leave that text.
⚫ # , and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, <nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article}}</nowiki>, filling in the exact name of the nominated article. Click on "Save page".
# Below the preloaded title, write which users and projects you'll notify (see step 6 below), and your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the ] that are at issue, then click on "Publish changes".
# Notify relevant parties by adding <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|Articlename}}</nowiki> to relevant talk pages (insert the article name). Relevant talk pages include the main contributors to the article (identifiable through the ), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). Leave a message at the top of the FAR indicating notifications completed.
⚫ # , and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, <nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}</nowiki>, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Publish changes".
|}
# Notify relevant parties by adding <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}} ~~~~</nowiki> (for example, <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}} ~~~~</nowiki>) to relevant talk pages (insert article name); note that the template does <em>not</em> automatically create the talkpage section header. {{pb}}Relevant parties include
#* main contributors to the article (identifiable through ),
#* the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and
#* any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified).
#: The ''Notified:''message at the top of the FAR should indicate who you have notified and include a link with the date of the pre-notification given on article talk.
|}<noinclude>
{{Documentation}}
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:10, 25 July 2023

Reviewing featured articles Shortcuts

This page is for the review and improvement of featured articles (FAs) that may no longer meet the featured article criteria. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted.

There are three requisite stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.

1. Raise issues at the article's talk page

  • In this step, concerned editors attempt to directly resolve issues with the existing community of article editors, and to informally improve the article. Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here).

2. Featured article review (FAR)

  • In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". The aim is to improve articles rather than to demote them. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status.
  • Reviews can improve articles in various ways: articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
  • The featured article review coordinators—Nikkimaria, Casliber, and DrKay—determine either that there is consensus to close during this second stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and so therefore the nomination should be moved to the third stage.

3. Featured article removal candidate (FARC)

  • An article is never listed as a removal candidate without first undergoing a review. In this third stage, participants may declare "keep" or "delist", supported by substantive comments, and further time is provided to overcome deficiencies.
  • Reviewers who declare "delist" should be prepared to return towards the end of the process to strike out their objections if they have been addressed.
  • The featured article review coordinators determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.

The FAR and FARC stages typically last two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.

To contact the FAR coordinators, please leave a message on the FAR talk page, or use the {{@FAR}} notification template elsewhere.

Urgent reviews are listed here. Older reviews are stored in the archive.

Table of Contents – This page: Purge cache, Checklinks, Check redirects, Dablinks

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC):

Featured article review (FAR):

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

Nominating an article for FAR

The number of FARs that can be placed on the page is limited as follows:

  1. No more than one nomination per week by the same nominator.
  2. No more than five nominations by the same nominator on the page at one time, unless permission for more is given by a FAR coordinator.

Nominators are strongly encouraged to assist in the process of improvement; they should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page (or have been featured there in the previous three days) and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.

  1. Before nomination, raise issues at talk page of the article. Attempt to directly resolve issues with the existing community of article editors, and to informally improve the article over at least a two-week period. Articles in this step are not listed on this page.
  2. Place {{subst:FAR}} at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Publish changes".
  3. From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; please leave that text.
  4. Below the preloaded title, write which users and projects you'll notify (see step 6 below), and your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion/criteria that are at issue, then click on "Publish changes".
  5. Click here, and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, {{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Publish changes".
  6. Notify relevant parties by adding {{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}} ~~~~ (for example, {{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}} ~~~~) to relevant talk pages (insert article name); note that the template does not automatically create the talkpage section header. Relevant parties include
    • main contributors to the article (identifiable through XTools),
    • the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and
    • any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified).
    The Notified:message at the top of the FAR should indicate who you have notified and include a link with the date of the pre-notification given on article talk.
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Instructions for the Featured Article Review process.

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:FAR-instructions/doc. (edit | history)
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. Category: