| Revision as of 05:23, 18 June 2005 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits →Your dispute← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:28, 15 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,873 edits not around since Dec 2005 | ||
| (222 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=19 December 2005}} | |||
| == Republic of Texas == | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Roderick T. Long== | |||
| ]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Roderick T. Long | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| Hello. I think adding a sidebar to ] was a very good thing. Howver, I removed the map of ] as ], since the borders of the present day had nothing to do with the borders of the Republic, which as you know were larger. The other map in the article (which I created) are the historical boundaries (showing the difference between what was claimed by the RoT and was disputed by ] during that time). -- ] 07:09, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC) | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Tom DeLay== | |||
| ==AfD nomination of MD4Bush Incident== | |||
| Your points on the talk page sound pretty good to me, but why not post them and then make the corrections yourself? Best way to ensure it gets done... | |||
| I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] 23:12, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Jim Robinson/Free Republic == | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of ]== | |||
| hey, | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ]] ] 17:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed you've been expanding the ] page. There is currently a minor dispute over whether the guy deserves his own page, or whether the infomation should go on the ] page. If you have any thoughts on the matter, please comment on the ] page. Thanks! --] 07:59, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| :The only apparent participant in that "dispute," JC, seems to be you. The majority of others who have weighed in on the ] talk page have favored keeping it separate, but rather than engage in a civilized, mature discussion there you have opted to ignore the comments there, focus on your personal disputes with another user, and tag the article for a VfD dispute when in fact doing so was inappropriate per wikipedia VfD policy. You need to grow up and learn how to work with other people before undertaking edits here. ] 17:27, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello Rangerdude! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''3''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Shirley DeLibero}}</small> | |||
| It's a shame that the tides are against you. I agree with your argument Ranger Dude, but at this point, there is no way to turn the votes around on the votes for undeletion page, which is overwhelmingly in favor of keeping it merged. It is a waste of time to vote otherwise. I just wanted to say that you aren't alone in your argument. I run into a lot of people that don't make sense, are delete-happy, and merge-happy. Good luck with your situation. I'm sorry tis doesn't seem to be able to be won, but if you think I can help somehow, shout at me on my talk page. ] 01:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Leon Hale}}</small> | |||
| :P.S. I moved your comment to my talk page. ] 02:10, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|William Murchison (journalist)}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 19:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| == A Question == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi, I was just wondering if you had a Free Republic account. I'd really like to read what you have to say there if you do. You could post it on your user page, reply here, or post it on my talk page. --] 19:17, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--] (])</span> 03:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry - don't have one. And you can tell that to your buddy ] who tagged you here as well. ] 21:07, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Tagged me here? I just happened to watch the debate and took a look at the Free Republic site where there are many passionate people with interesting ideas and I was wondering if I could get some background on yours. FYI, I'm halidecyphon over there. ] 13:27, 1 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Sure you did. A self-admitted close friend of another user who was engaged in an editing dispute with me and who happens to agree with that other user's position against me just happens to stumble upon my talk page out of curiosity and, in further pursuing that curious drive, finds the need to inquire whether I am a user of ]...presumably so we can all meet up over there and be freeper "friends," right? It's called trolling for information. ] 16:08, 1 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You're absolutely correct that I am a friend of JCs, and that I found out about you and about Free Republic through the Jim Robinson edit debate (as stated above). I just wanted to learn more about the situation, and hopefully to understand your point of view. Thus my question. I'm very sorry if I've violated your talk space. Feel free to delete this discussion if you're so inclined. ] 15:20, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please see this: a discussion about reducing the length of Slrubenstein's block for breaking the 3RR on Jesus.--] 23:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Jesus == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| Good work on the Jesus page. The only way to counter stuffing the ballot box is to be organized in like manner. Keep me in mind ] 05:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :Yep it's a wikiclique at work. They're gonna be in for a shock if they think 2 dozen athiests are gonna rewrite 2000 years of human experience. ] 05:32, 11 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 20:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
| No, actually I don't like the fact that you called one vote "ballot box stuffing", or that you claim I "expressed my surprise that the tide of the vote had turned", or any of the many other false claims you have made. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 06:18, 11 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| he was sus :( | |||
| :Fib, distort, and backtrack all you want but your ballot recruitment record speaks for itself, Jayjg. That's the great thing about wikipedia - it keeps a record of EVERYTHING including the evidence of your act found ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ] 15:59, 11 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| I have seen your involvement with the AD/BC dispute and want to tell you that you're absolutely right on this one. I won't get involved myself, having my hands full of other flaming stuff, but just one additional information on a similar thing in Germany: | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 21:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
| The traditional dating is "vor Christus (v. Chr.) " and "nach Christus (n. Chr.)", meaning "before" and "after Christ" (AD is used as a very archaic form), but of course after 1949 that wasn't well thought of in Eastern Germany, so they invented "vor unserer Zeitrechnung (v.u.Z.)" and "nach unserer Zeitrechnung", meaning "before" and "after our time reckoning". By that you can immediately tell whether a book comes from the East. I guess BCE/CE also stems from the same "attitude" (=POV), also there was no central comitee in the US or the UK. | |||
| Regards, ] 15:34, 11 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Houston Chronicle == | |||
| Katefan indicated she'd be willing to discuss the issues you mentioned once mediation was established. Would you be willing to accept mediation, so we can start to look at the real issues in the article and attempt to resolve them? There's obviously been much going on between you and I think a neutral 3rd party would help you guys (or girls) in reaching an agreement. -- ]|] 17:35, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| Would you object to this mediation to be done public on a subpage of ]? | |||
| First of all, I'd like both of you to promise the follow these rules. | |||
| # You won't edit the article while mediation is ongoing. Suspected sockpuppeting should be reported to me personally for investigation. | |||
| # No comments aimed at the other party or their edits should contain loaded language that can be construed as offensive or otherwise hurtful. | |||
| # Mediation should be done in good faith without regard for previous editing behavior. | |||
| # Comments should be made about the other person's edits and not them as a person. If possible you should try to bring sources to the table which I can review. | |||
| # If, somewhere along the way, you think there's a possibility to reach an agreement on any of the disputed points, let it be known as soon as you can. | |||
| Please respond to let me know if you agree to follow these rules and whether you object to public mediation. -- ]|] 18:31, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *''"I would prefer that it focus primarily upon the differences between myself and Katefan0 regarding the section in question."'' <br> | |||
| Yes, I was planning on giving those editors a seperate section to comment in. - ]|] 06:45, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *I've started a page for the mediation on ]. Note that I've changed the first rule of the mediation (on editing), to accomodate your complaint on my talk page. Please provide a detailed account of your views on the article and which sections or sentences you consider disputed and provide alternatives you think are better. Wherever possible, please provide sources and diff edits to support your view. If you expressed your views elsewhere, please copy them, rather than providing links. - ]|] 21:44, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Rangerdude: perhaps you may wanna call the attention to the mediator that the tag team technique in mediation including a disinterested party may lack good faith, and is just an attempt to wear you down. It is a distraction from the issues under consideration and has no real basis pertaining to this article. Good luck. ] 01:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :No question of a pattern. Please note the administrator in question I do not beleive is an ]; I beleive he resides in ]. His politics are ideologically motivated and his understanding of American society, politics, and ] is second hand. He appears very much affected by the export of ]'s ideas on ], but has never had to deal with the diversity in everyday life of American thought and experience. Hence, he can come across as ideolistic and intollerent. Just my own dime store diagnosis. Keep me posted. ] 05:25, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Personal comments == | |||
| Please stop using the term "stalker" to refer to my efforts in this project. Your use of the term has the appearance of a personal attack. Thank you. -] 08:34, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Then please stop engaging in behavior that strongly resembles wiki-stalking. Following other editors around wikipedia to intentionally challenge, disrupt, and deconstruct every edit they make on virtually every article regardless of the content is extremely poor etiquette, especially when most of the said edits are petty changes or challenges made without merit or proper background. You have demonstrably engaged in behavior of this type towards me for a long time and have, of recent, increased its intensity in a manner that is deconstructive and disruptive to the general purpose of wikipedia. An occasional encounter on common topics of interest is one thing, but nobody made you policeman or gave you the right to unilaterally screen and deconstruct the work of all editors you disagree with politically. ] 09:00, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::There is no policy against constructive, NPOV edits on Misplaced Pages. Labelling edits with a term that you apparently believe is a perjorative is a personal attack, regardless of its truth or inaccuracy, and there is a policy against that. We are here to write an encyclopedia, and personal comments in no way help that effort. Thank you, -] 09:08, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::There are, however, extensive policies and guidelines requiring etiquette and civility. Stalking other editors around wikipedia for no other purpose than to deconstruct, disrupt, annoy, and unnecessarily complicate valid and sound additions to the articles on this forum expresses neither, thus I will continue to object to your behavior and call it exactly what it is so long as you persist in your etiquette violations. I will also note that internet stalking is generally considered a form of trolling. It thus pertinent information to any arbitration proceeding involving harassment behavior that is deconstructive to wikipedia & precedents abound establishing this. ] 16:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Rangerdude: yes I am familiar with the administrator in question. Actually I may owe him a debt of gratitude since after my blog site & e-mail account were hacked I decided to just do all my work in the wiki community. Given his analytical skills he should perhaps stick with hacking since thats seems to be where his real talents lie (incidentlaly, my original ] password was stolen about a week ago when I was still learning Firefox). And as to the rhetorical arts, the subjects parsing of facts really aren't worthy of the ].] 18:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Let me amend the above "sometimes aren't worthy of the ]". ] 21:51, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC == | |||
| Since you have been repeatedly using personal attacks I have filed an RrC to gain other user input about that conduct. ]. I have nothing personal against you and don't understand why you choose to make personal comments and why you refuse to participate in mediation with me. Regretfully, -] 04:55, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Your assertion that by vocally stating my objections to your behavior of following me around the forum with overly harassing and deconstructive edits to my work, or wiki-stalking as I have described it, somehow constitutes a "personal attack" is a patent falsehood, Will. I have REPEATEDLY voiced my objection to your behavior and the general lack of etiquette it entails to no avail, thus directly confronting you on it with multiple requests not to wiki-stalk me was both accurate and necessary. To assert that I refuse to participate in mediation with you is another falsehood as well. I indicated that I did not desire for you to participate in the closed mediation between myself and katefan for reason of your pattern of disruptive and harassing behavior towards me. I did not state that you couldn't participate in the open mediation found on the second half of the page, nor have I ever attempted to prevent you from posting there. Given our differences, I think it is best that we should seek to avoid each other on wikipedia wherever possible and in all cases of articles except those where we both have an immediate and strong editing interest. I would hope that you would feel the same way, yet I also know that you have intentionally sought me out over the course of several months in virtually every corner of wikipedia, hence the rub. Sadly it seems to have come to seeking outside intervention. Since at this point, quite frankly, I want nothing more to do with you I am content to seek out the aforementioned solution. Whether you will or whether you'll continue more of the same however remains in doubt. ] 09:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I welcome mediation with you. Thanks for being open to the prospect. I'd be happy to withdraw my RfC if we can engage in mediation instead. My only complaint is with your personal comments. Thanks, -] 09:15, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::As I indicated, you are free to participate in the designated section of the mediation page (though not the closed one). If you do so I will consider your comments as any other. I will further note that standing issues remain as to your editing practices though, and I anticipate that you will find a means of addressing those practices that I have stated to be objectionable, of poor etiquette, and generally deconstructive to wikipedia. Asserting an objection with your editing practices is a criticism, and as I have emphatically stated it is a criticism I sincerely make and would like to see you resolve. That does not mean it's a personal attack though. ] 09:25, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Rangerdude: I'm still a relative newbie and learning the process, so I may need your assitance in following the process. Please keep me apprised. Thanx. ] 14:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Query== | |||
| Rangerdude, did you make this edit or is someone playing games? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 14:13, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, it's addressed to you, not signed by you. My apologies. I can guess who's behind it. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 14:17, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your dispute== | |||
| I wish you would re-consider some of your issues with Willmcw. He's a good editor who sticks closely to policy, and it's beginning to look as though you're following him around the board trying to make trouble for him, which is only succeeding in making you look bad; for example, with your support today of Poetatoe, who was clearly a troublemaker and a sockpuppet. Perhaps if you were to give yourself a break from interacting with him, you might see things differently in a week or so. Situations have a tendency to look distorted to us when we're in the thick of them, as I know from my own experience. I hope you'll give that some consideration. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 05:23, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:28, 15 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Rangerdude has not edited Misplaced Pages since 19 December 2005. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
AfD nomination of Roderick T. Long
An editor has nominated Roderick T. Long, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Roderick T. Long and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of MD4Bush Incident
I have nominated MD4Bush Incident, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/MD4Bush Incident. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 20:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Texans for True Mobility
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Texans for True Mobility, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rangerdude! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Shirley DeLibero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Leon Hale - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- William Murchison (journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of William Murchison (journalist)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on William Murchison (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Nuujinn (talk) 03:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ray Neff for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Neff is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ray Neff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Libertybison (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
he was sus :(
Nomination of Roderick T. Long for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roderick T. Long is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Roderick T. Long (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
David Gerard (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Categories: