Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Villárvattam: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:49, 28 August 2007 editM.V.E.i. (talk | contribs)4,236 edits []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:50, 11 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. The nominator has even agreed that a move and rewrite is an acceptable solution. — ]::''']''' 07:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}}
:{{la|Villárvattam}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Villárvattam}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
After reviewing ] contributions, and the fact that there is ] for another article that the author created, I believe this article should be '''deleted'''. It needs to be completely rewritten and perhaps moved to '''Raja Thoma Villarvattom'''. There definitely was a Hindu King who converted to Christianity. After his death, however, his lands passed to the ]. This article makes a lot of dubious claims: After reviewing ] contributions, and the fact that there is ] for another article that the author created, I believe this article should be '''deleted'''. It needs to be completely rewritten and perhaps moved to '''Raja Thoma Villarvattom'''. There definitely was a Hindu King who converted to Christianity. After his death, however, his lands passed to the ]. This article makes a lot of dubious claims:
Line 16: Line 22:
:*This AfD nomination was ]. It is listed now. ] 11:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC) :*This AfD nomination was ]. It is listed now. ] 11:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. If you have a problem with a detail fix it, find other information yourself. ] 16:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. If you have a problem with a detail fix it, find other information yourself. ] 16:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] <span style="border:thin solid gold;">] | ]</span> 22:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment'''. Why not just move the article to ] and fix any unsourced/dubious stuff? ] | ] 08:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' - Ok, will do that. I'll also create an article under Villarvattam so that it doesn't redirect to the new article. --]<sup></span>]]</sup> 16:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 13:50, 11 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator has even agreed that a move and rewrite is an acceptable solution. — TKD::Talk 07:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Villárvattam

Villárvattam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

After reviewing the creator's contributions, and the fact that there is an ongoing AfD for another article that the author created, I believe this article should be deleted. It needs to be completely rewritten and perhaps moved to Raja Thoma Villarvattom. There definitely was a Hindu King who converted to Christianity. After his death, however, his lands passed to the Paliath Achan. This article makes a lot of dubious claims:

  • Villarvattom being an Empire.
  • Villarvattom conquering Muziris.
  • The Villarvattom dynasty existing from the 10th to the 14th century.
  • The Villarvattom dynasty being the most powerful Emprire in Ancient Kerala.
  • "King" Itty Thomman who was apparently the first king. Actually, he was a Syrian Christian Vicar who was also a local leader and led resistance efforts against the imposition of Roman Catholicism by the Portuguese.

Needless to say all of these claims are unsourced and I cannot find anything that will corroborate these claims. --vi5in 20:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment: No, the article should be deleted, because Villarvattom doesn't describe a Christian King. It describes a town/city/principality. A new article called Raja Thoma Villarvattom should be created, with proper information. --vi5in 16:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.