Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jimmy Wales: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:38, 29 August 2007 edit68.117.211.187 (talk) Controversy section - has what he's done really been particularly controversial?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:07, 15 January 2025 edit undoFlightTime (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors157,682 edits Newer 2024 image?: Current 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{skiptotoctalk}}
{{Article history
{{oldpeerreview}}
| action1 = AFD
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align: left;"
| action1date = 14 October 2005
|-
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales
| ]
| action1result = kept
| '''If you need to contact Jimbo about something, please do so at ], not here.''' As Jimbo explains...
| action1oldid = 14579563


| action2 = AFD
"People who are trying to leave messages for me will likely be more satisfied if they leave messages on my ] than if they leave them here. This is the talk page for the article about me, not a place to talk to me. I rarely read this. --] 06:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)"
| action2date = 14 August 2007
|}
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination)
{{talkheader}}
| action2result = speedily kept
{{WikiProjectBanners
| action2oldid = 151188864
|1 = {{WPBiography|class=GA|priority=Mid|living=yes}}
|2 = {{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|class=GA|importance=Top}}
|3 = {{WP Internet culture|class=GA|importance=Top}}
|4 = {{WikiProject Alabama|class=GA}}
}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=PR
|action1date=23:22, 15 June 2006
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Jimmy Wales/Archive 1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=58840827


| action3 = AFD
|action2=GAN
| action3date = 31 August 2007
|action2date=01:35, 5 July 2006
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination)
|action2result=listed
| action3result = speedily kept
|action2oldid=62024022
| action3oldid = 154846896


| action4 = GAN
|action3=FAC
| action4date = 25 March 2012
|action3date=22:58, 10 October 2006
| action4link = Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA1
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Jimmy Wales/archive1
| action4result = failed
|action3result=not promoted
| action4oldid = 477279005
|action3oldid=80703703


|action5 = AFD
|action4=GAR
|action5date = 14:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
|action4date=12:54, 17 October 2006
|action5link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (8th nomination)
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Good_articles/Disputes/Archive_8#Jimmy_Wales
|action5result = speedily kept
|action4result=kept
|action5oldid = 758452878
|action4oldid=81895538


|currentstatus=GA |currentstatus = FGAN
|topic = Social sciences and society
|gacat=biz people
}}
|topic=Socsci}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes |collapsed=yes |class=B |vital=yes |listas=Wales, Jimmy |1=
{{WP1.0|WPCD=yes|class=GA}}
{{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Jimmy_Wales.ogg|small=yes}} {{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=High}}
{{wikipedian-bio|Jimbo Wales|Wales, Jimbo|editedhere=yes|small=yes}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}}
{{archives|auto=|small=yes}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid |websites=yes |websites-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low |IN=yes |IN-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Alabama}}
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}}
{{WikiProject Objectivism|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Open |importance=High}}
}}
<!-- Inactive Projects -->
<!-- End of Inactive Projects -->
{{Press
| subject = article
| author = Yermi Brenner
| title = Taking On Misplaced Pages's Bias
| org = Medium
| url = https://medium.com/better-humans/11acd4a7f44c
| date = {{date|24 June 2013}}
| quote =
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/6ITfm2rhu
| archivedate = {{date|28 July 2013}}
| accessdate = {{date|28 July 2013}}
| author2 = Madeleine Spence
| title2 = Larry Sanger: ‘I wouldn’t trust Misplaced Pages — and I helped to invent it’
| org2 = The Sunday Times
| url2 = https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/larry-sanger-i-wouldnt-trust-wikipedia-and-i-helped-to-invent-it-cflrhmdhx
| date2 = {{date|1 August 2021}}
| quote2 =
| archiveurl2 =
| archivedate2 =
| accessdate2 =
| author3 = ]
| title3 = VIPs expect special treatment. At Misplaced Pages, don’t even ask.
| org3 = ]
| url3 = https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-john-eastman-editing/2021/10/28/f2d61bea-35fd-11ec-9bc4-86107e7b0ab1_story.html
| date3 = 28 October 2021
| quote3 =
| accessdate3 = 29 October 2021


| author4 = ]
== WP Alabama ==
| title4 = Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales Has Already Solved the Internet's Problems
| org4 = ]
| url4 = https://reason.com/video/2022/04/28/wikipedias-jimmy-wales-has-already-solved-the-internets-problems/
| date4 = 28 April 2022
| quote4 =
| accessdate4 = 6 May 2022
}}
{{Notable Wikipedian|Jimbo Wales|declared=yes|editedhere=yes}}
{{tmbox|type=content|class=tmbox-talk-notice|text=
<big>This talk page is '''only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales'''.</big>
* '''To talk to Jimmy Wales himself''', please use ''']'''.
* '''To get help with general Misplaced Pages questions''', see the ''']'''.
* '''To discuss Misplaced Pages policy or practices''', see the ''']'''.
* '''For other useful links''', see the ''']'''.}}


{{merged-from|Jimmy Wales Foundation|14 December 2020}}
How could this article relate to WikiProject Alabama when the only (known) thing Jimbo has in common with it is his birthplace in ]? &mdash; ]] 02:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
{{pp-move-indef}}


{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
:You answered your own question; the fact that he was born and raised in Alabama places him in the scope of the Alabama WikiProject. ] 02:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
|target=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive index

|mask=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive <#>
::Does he live there now? &mdash; ]] 03:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=no
:::No. ] 03:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config
::Being born in Alabama is not the only known thing Jimmy Wales has in common with Alabama. Wales was also educated in Alabama. He attended the University of '''Alabama''' in Tuscaloosa, '''Alabama''' and Auburn University in Auburn, '''Alabama'''. ] 19:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
:::what does he have to do with the state itself? should every american with an article on wikipedia fall under the scope of ]? ] 00:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 14
== Website as Userpage ==
|minthreadsleft = 4

|algo = old(30d)
I removed his userpage link that was under the title "Website" per ] ie Misplaced Pages is not a Personal web page and thus should not advertise his userpage as a personal website. Instead of just reverting ] edits i thought i would bring it here as ] is a policy. I would like to hear Jimmy's option if he considers this his personal website or not. ] 10:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d
: It's not as much his personal website, as it is his official page as benevolent dictator of this project. <small>Aum. <strikes forehead against floor>.</small> Highly relevant to his main area of notability. Keep it. --] <sup>]</sup> 12:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
:If we are looking for a link which directs people to further information about me, the best link will be my blog, which I consider to be my "personal website" in the relevant sense. My wikipedia userpage is a wikipedia userpage and therefore not a personal website. However, as to the question of whether this article should send people to my wikipedia userpage or not, I guess that is a different question, and I have no opinion. What do we generally do when subjects of articles also have userpages? We should be more or less consistent, I suppose.--] 13:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|target=/Archive index
::Normally we use {{tl|Notable Wikipedian}}. As this talk page has a special notice ''"If you need to contact Jimbo about something..."'', it might be a little spammy to add the NW template. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|mask=/Archive <#>
:::We already have that template here, disguised via a redirect. Look at the right column. --] 00:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}
:Having a link hidden in the talk page is not at all the same as having it in the article, I feel that the link ] should be kept in the article. Because the two subjects of Jimbo and wikipedia are innately woven together, coming from him being on wikipedia. Or to put it another way, a large part of his fame comes from the work he has done as a user on wikipedia. Thus it makes sense to link to his userpage on wikipedia. Exactly the same as ''if'' (pretend example here...) I became very famous for my writings the times, then it would makes logical sense to link to my userpage on the times (if it is informative). ] <sup>]</sup> 17:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
__TOC__

== missing pictures == == Date/age issue ==

At least are missing from this article. I recommend the pictures be restored. <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 01:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:This is important, I thought. I think the pictures should be added back in. <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 19:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:: Besides picturing Wales they don't have anything to do with the article. They are redundant and should not be restored. ] 17:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

== External link craziness ==

Check out ]. Per ], the external links need a very good clean up. <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 01:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:Yeah, I'd just kill them all except the first 3 and then put in a link to dmoz or something. ] 03:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
::About half of the external links should be removed. Thanks. <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 19:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Isn't it sad that the founders page has an external links user box?!?] 08:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

== Reversion of my change to Jimmy Wales ==
'''(moved Tualha comment from QuackGuru's talk page by QuackGuru)''' <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 19:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello QuackGuru, did you read the edit summary of my change before you reverted it? I don't think we need to clutter up the citation with that rather long quote. The only way it supports the point is by referring to Jimbo as Misplaced Pages's "co-founder".

I observe that the text I removed . Allow me to remind you of what every page says when you edit it: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, '''do not submit it.'''" You seem to be taking the removal of your text personally, or something. Please be assured I am just trying to improve the article. No one "owns" these articles, and insisting that one's changes be retained without justification is inappropriate.

I also don't understand why you summarized your change as ''("quotes" in small)'', when you did not change any text size, but merely reverted the last change. Did some program insert that text? Edit summaries are a useful guide to other editors, so it's important to make sure they're accurate.

Cheers, ] (]) 15:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:<small>It's kind of surprising that you could just open up a site and let people work," said Jimmy Wales, Misplaced Pages's co-founder and the chief executive of Bomis, a San Diego search engine company that donates the computer resources for the project. "There's kind of this real social pressure to not argue about things." Instead, he said, "there's a general consensus among all of the really busy volunteers about what an encyclopedia article needs to be like.</small>

I added the "quotes" in small. To answer your question: I am a person and not a program. The quotes are very relevant and add to the article. Images are missing from this article. There is external link craziness. Relevant small quotes are being removed. Whats happening here? <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 19:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*It should be noted that the whole section above was not actually posted by ], but was actually posted by {{user|QuackGuru}}. It looks like a textdump for Quack's talkpage.--] 19:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
**Yes, I originally posted it on QuackGuru's talk page, he moved it here for some reason. Verbatim, I checked. ] (]) 19:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
***Yeah, I noticed that after the fact. Cut and paste like that isn't the best practice because off the cuff it looks like impersonation since you were not in the edit log for having made that comment here.--] 19:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
****Responding to QuackGuru, my points were:
::::#The quote is ''not'' relevant: where you have it, it should be supporting the statement "Sanger was identified as a co-founder of Misplaced Pages at least as early as September 2001". While the cited article does support that statement, the quote does not. All it does is refer to Jimmy Wales, in an offhand way, as "Misplaced Pages's co-founder". In my opinion, this rather lengthy quote doesn't carry its weight.
::::#You reverted my change, but whereas the edit summary should say something like ''reverted Tualha's change'' or ''undid Tualha's edit'', instead it says ''"quotes" in small'', which means very little. The edit summary should briefly explain the change and its purpose.
::::] (]) 19:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::I will use a more relevant quote. Thanks for your concern. Please review. <span style="border: 3px solid #90ade3;">]]</span> 20:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
::::::That one will do, though it can be trimmed. Thanks. ] (]) 21:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

== First sentence in the education section ==

That part I fixed yesterday in the education section is logically inconsistent. It reads like the school was donating the software to itself. It's not Jimbo's user page so I have right to fix it, right? Why has it been undone then? ] 13:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

== Birthdate ==

'''I just .--] 09:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Supposedly, he was born on the 8th, and ] also thinks its the 7th. See from ] newspaper. Also see about an interview with him, ] and the newspaper, as well as a print article, . ] 22:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

It looks like a reporter from a major newspaper has reported on a public records search, confirming what I have been saying for a long time. According to my birth certificate, August 7th is not my birthdate. Perhaps someday I will produce a note from my mom for another reporter. And perhaps I will just continue to have a bit of fun with this. :)--] 09:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:Mr. Wales has stated that his birthday is Aug. 7th, 1966. Links to these admissions can be found and . Also, both ] and ] list his birthday as being the 7th. ] 07:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

::I hope I am not the only one who is amused that this anonymous ip number calls a discussion of my date of birth an "admission". :) Perhaps I shall next confess to having brown hair. --] 18:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks for the links. I don't think I saw the archive of this page when I came here. I'm not seeing the first edit you link to in the page history, but the second one does seem somewhat conclusive. Its interesting, because here (at your links) he seems pretty firm that its the 7th, yet the blog post (written by for a major metro newspaper, so hopefully a reliable source) really sounds like he said that its not the 7th. Overall, it does seem that a difference of a day isn't much to worry about. ] 09:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

::: Yeah, it's a bit weird. Here's a that clarifies things a bit better than my first one. Of course, we can't use Wikepedia as a reliable source for information, which is why it's important to use more scholarly source like ]. ] 18:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

::::Another good link. I was really just comparing what Wales has said here and in the interview. I do see the awkwardness of citing something here inside Misplaced Pages. Source-wise, it seems to be Current Biography, Who's Who and Britannica vs. The Oregonian interview and . Assuming Current Biography and Who's Who don't also have questions about the date, for now I'm willing to leave the it as is, and use them as reference. ] 08:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::It might also be worth noting that on ] '''we''' list August 7 as his birthday. If this is incorrect, I think we look really, really stupid here. ] 20:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::::::Misplaced Pages isn't about truth, it's about providing ] information from ]. I really don't thnk it's something to worry about. ] 21:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::::His DOB is on August 8 according to Jimmy. Agreed? ]] 22:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::::::::No. Sadly, Mr. Wales cannot be used as a reliable source since his statements about his DOB have been inconsistent. As previously mentioned only verifiable information from reliable, published sources can be used on Misplaced Pages. Even if that was not the case I can find no records where Mr. Wales has said that his birthday was on August 8th. If you can reference a source for that fact, which meets Misplaced Pages's guidelines, please do so. Till then I feel that we must continue to rely on the previously mentioned sources and keep his DOB as is. ] 03:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::::::Yes! Happily, Jimbo can be used as a reliable source per ] policy. Cheers. ]] 05:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::::::::::You have failed to provide a source where Mr. Wales makes this claim. We can't just take your word for it. ] 05:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

In response to the most recent edits, a simple reminder; you cannot use Misplaced Pages or blogs as sources. Misplaced Pages is not its own reference and blogs are not acceptable as sources, according to ]. If we were to use Misplaced Pages as a source I would direct everyone to statements and edits made by Mr. Wales where he ,

<blockquote>
"My actual birthday is August 7th, 1966. This is unverifiable information, I'm sorry to say, since my driver's license and passport say August 8. If we must revert on that basis, then I guess we must. *g*. Maybe I'll have to upload a signed note from my mom as documentary evidence; the only proof that I have is her sayso. :-) Jimbo Wales 20:55, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)"
</blockquote>

However, since a number of verifiable resources do provide this information and no published, reliable source refutes it we must stick with what we got. Remember, the threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth. ] 16:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:Hmm. Oddly that was added not by Jimbo but . There is no contribution history from Jimbo with that timestamp or anything like it (not on meta either.) But, where he sets it to the 7th. Boggle! See http://blog.jimmywales.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/08/my-birthdate/ &larr;]<sup>]</sup> 18:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:: Thanks for pointing out the strange timestamp, that is odd. After doing some internet research it appears this is an old and somebody with oversight powers on Misplaced Pages removed Mr. Wales' quote. However, as you pointed out with your there have been times when Mr. Wales has edited his bio to state that his birthday is Aug 7th. As silly as it sounds given the fact that Mr. Wales has flip-flopped over when his actual birthdate is we can't use him as a reliable source. Three years ago he said it was the 7th, now he says it's the 8th. If next year he say's it's the 9th should we change it again? Remember, we '''need''' reliable, published sources for content.... Mr. Wales' blog never makes the claim that his birthdate is Aug. 8th.... it refers to another blog where Wales' states that "Nobody knows..." when his birthdate is and the blogger claims that it's the 8th. That's not good enough. ] 19:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


:::I don't think I have flip flopped at all. I have had a bit of fun by being cryptic from time to time, but have been consistent throughout. At the present time, and for the first time EVER, we appear to have a reliable source: a reporter who has done a public record search.--] 10:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

:::Let's use a bit of common sense here... is Jimbo's birthdate being in February or August really all that contentious of a topic that it merits edit warring? I mean seriously.--] <sup>'']''</sup> 19:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I am confused. Jimbo first said his birthday is on the 7th and ''NOT'' on the 8th.

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jimmy_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=5987088 ''See here and...''

http://wikimediafoundation.org/search/?title=Board_of_Trustees&diff=prev&oldid=406 ''here.''

OK. This is a little weird. I am scratching my head. How can we ] this? I must say. This is a difficult one. ]] 20:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

::I am confused too, hence my removing any date and putting on the totally disputed tag. Obviously I wont be reverting over this one, ] 20:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:::If you ask me, it is entirely silly to have a section of the article on this topic. To my mind, this seems pretty simple. For the first time, we have a reliable source on the date, and currently we don't even mention it. Linking to Misplaced Pages diffs is invalid. Linking to my blog can be perfectly valid, and certainly linking to the Oregonian article is perfectly valid. Britannica is a tertiary source at best and should be ignored. The simple correction that was made yesterday seems best to me.--] 10:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Why don't we just say "Jimbo Wales was born on the ], and thus his precise date of birth can not be decided"? Sure, it's a little dubious, but if it would stop the fighting --''']'''<small>]]]</small> 11:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

What I'd like to know is . It seems like a pretty obvious abuse of the oversight power. &larr;]<sup>]</sup> 13:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:I would like to know what evidence there is it was oversighted. Neither your or I are admins so we AFAIK can't tell the difference between things that are oversighted and things that are deleted... Whatever the case, it would seem to me this doesn't really belong here. Perhaps the VP or Administrator's Noticeboard or some such ] 13:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
::If it was not oversighted, then General Patton signed Jimbo's name. Google a phrase from the edit in question and you'll see. &larr;]<sup>]</sup> 14:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::That, sadly, is what makes this controversal and the fact that this matter is starting to get mentioned in outside media (e.g. Britannica, the blog of Oregonian reporter Mike Rogoway) makes it worthy of mention. Regardless, if General Patton falsified a record to masquerade as Mr. Wales, a record of this act should be made here. Likewise, if an admin abused the oversight function to make it appear that General Patton falsified a record than that needs to be recorded as well (although neither circumstance explains edits made by Mr. Wales where he changes his DOB from the 8th to the 7th, but that's a different story).] 16:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

::::Come on, its not that important, falsify is completely OTT, ] 17:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

::::Britannica doesn't AFAIK say anything about the supposed oversighted deletion. All they say is that Jimbo Wales contacted them to say it was a different date but didn't provide proof. Jimbo Wales agreed with this in his blog. So again, if you think there is a controversy here, please show it ] 17:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

::Sorry I forgot about the deletion log . From the deletion log, it appears that it was not simply deleted. There have been some deletions but it doesn't look to me like any of them were to remove the revision which is purported to be missing (although only an admin can say for sure). However it appears both Ben & 84 failed to consider it could have been deleted so my main point stands. Don't assume something is oversighted when it could have been deleted. And my second point also stands. If you have a complaint about 'abuse' of the oversight system, take it up in a more appropriate channel since it has absolutely nothing to do with the article. ] 17:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Just a quick question now that the date has been reverted to Aug 8th. Why is the blog (not an article but a blog) of some reporter (for a local newspaper) considered to be more reliable than the Encyclopedia Britannica, Current Biography, and Who’s Who in America in light of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]? ] 17:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

:Encyclopedia Britannica? How is that a reliable source? Its a rival encyclopedia, ] 18:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
::Being a rival doesn't discredit ones credibility, especially when Misplaced Pages started the rivalry. --] 18:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::I am not doubting their credibility but they are not a reliable source, that is obvious. They themselves would need to use reliable sources to be our equal but even so they cannot be a reliable source precisely because they just use reliable sources, that would be a self-defeating catch-22 type situation, ] 18:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Let me quote Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. ''"What is a reliable source? Reliable sources are authors or publications regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. Reliable publications are those with an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight."'' So again I ask my question why is the blog of a reporter for a small-time newspaper considered to be more reliable than the Encyclopedia Britannica, Current Biography, and Who’s Who in America - each of which has a reliable reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight? ] 18:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

:You may be right about the Oregon web page though the fact that it is local makes no odds. I would clearly say EB does not fit the definition you have given of a reliable source, othjerwise we could just copy from them and it would make us absurd, ] 19:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

FYI - the ] is in the public domain and has been extensively copied by Misplaced Pages. We can't "copy" the current EB because that would violate their copyright terms. While I disagree with your claim that EB is not a reliable source, given that it contains some of the most extensive biographies of notable people found anywhere else, I don't think you can make the same claim for either Current Biography, and Who’s Who in America - whose bread and butter is personal biographies. ] 19:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

:Added the following quote from Wales, "My date of birth is not August 8, 1966." A link to statement can be found . Hopefully, this page won't disappear like the last one. Just in case it does it was located between the following edits, 13:45, 11 July 2006 Theresa knott (Talk | contribs) (→The birth date....) and 16:27, 11 July 2006 Jimbo Wales (Talk | contribs) (→A fine point about Jimmy's wealth).

:Given that EB, Current Biography, and Who’s Who in America reports Mr. Wales' DOB as Aug. 7th, 1966 and only reporter Mike Rogoway's blog reports the date as the 8th, which contradicts Wales statement in the above quote, can we revert the article and list the DOB as the 7th instead of leaving it blank.? ] 17:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

== Libertarian? ==
can we list him as a libertarian even though he doesnt like the libertarian party? i mean you can be conservative but not be a republican or a liberal and not be a democrat. so would it be safe to add him to the "American libertarian" category?

:Probably not.
I suggest talking to Jim, so he knows your adding him, and he can disagree or agree on it.
<i><font color="CC00CC"> Megan :) </font></i> 05:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

::Remember that the threshold for inclusion of any information is ] in ], not truth. If the fact that he is Libertarian in his political philosophy has been published in a citable reliable source, then by all means add it to the appropriate section. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

:::The only evidence we have of his libertarianism are his expressed support of ostensibly similar beliefs such as Objectivism. Seeing as Objectivists, such as myself, Ayn Rand, and those at ARI, often dislike the use of the term "libertarian" in regard to us, this is no proof that he identifies himself as a libertarian. Until there is expressed knowledge, it should be left out. ] 15:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

== NPOV ==

As always, it is deeply inappropriate for Misplaced Pages to take a stand on any controversial issue. It is therefore wrong to call me the co-founder of Misplaced Pages. Please someone fix this. There has been a long standing consensus as to how to deal with this, a compromise that avoids the question. "best known for his role in founding Misplaced Pages". Whoever changed it should be asked not to do that again.
--] 09:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:I made the change, but I have not been able to trace back to the editor that changed it, yet. ] <small>]</small> 09:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

::I changed it to"known for his role in founding, running, and promoting" which I hope will remove the problem as Jimmy clearly isnt co-promoting or co-running wikipedia so hopefully this shouldnt happen again, ] 19:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

== Brian Peppers Controversy ==

I believe that this represents a legitimate controversy that's worth mentioning here. Mr. Wales's actions in this case were unprecedented and have some serious ramifications for Misplaced Pages in general. Moreover, the claim of controversy isn't out of place. --] 15:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

My actions were in no way unprecedented, and there was basically no controversy. There was an AfD, the article was deleted, and some trolls kept recreating it anyway, and I deleted it and said knock it off for a certain amount of time. When that time was up, the matter was considered and the article remained deleted. Of all the things that happen in Misplaced Pages that might be controversial this is pretty low on the list. --] 18:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:Jimbo, I'd like to apologize for my rashness. With the discussion page blanked, I only had other pages to go by, which portrayed the event as more substantive than it actually is. --] 16:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. ] (]) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Here is the problem... you may consider this notable ], but it doesn't seem to be very significant in regards to general media coverage of the incident. It really is a non-issue in the grand scheme of things and I don't see anything to indicate "serious ramifications" for Misplaced Pages in general. The other listed controversies have at least garnered some publicity.--] <sup>'']''</sup> 19:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:The "Brian Peppers controversy" is such a non-issue it really does not warrant inclusion in Jimbo's biography at all. --] <small>]</small> 12:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
===Brian Peppers===
In February 2006, the Misplaced Pages article on ] was deleted by Jimmy Wales. Since its creation in ], the article was repeatedly deleted and recreated. When brought before a community review, most users supported keeping the article. However, on February 22, 2006, Wales removed the article in full, removed its discussion page, and issued a one year moratorium on the article's recreation. The page currently remains protected.


:That ''Daily Beast'' source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, ''The News Courier'', either original or archived, so can't see what it says. ] (]) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
I do not see any references for the above information. Is this true and is there any references from the general media. ]] 20:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::@] Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3. ''''']''''' (]) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


== Jimbo ==
: indicate not but without an outside relaible source there is no chance of including it anyway, ] 20:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::We can cite primary sources when they aren't challenged, right? &larr;]<sup>]</sup> 09:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Good luck not being challenged on this. I think the interpretation above is nonsense, suggesting that I acted (controversially) against community consensus. This is just more trolling about it if you ask me.--] 10:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Um no you can't. For ] reasons in particular, you can't make up a controversy if none exists. Primary sources may be able to establish that something happened but they cannot establish it's controversial. Even if Jimbo Wales one time seriously said "I enjoy beating my wife and I think all men should be allowed to beat their wives" (random made up example) which is seemingly a controversial statement, it's not a controversy UNLESS other reliable sources establish it as a controversy ]
::::Firstly, I am opposed to the section; it has no place in this article because it is such a minor thing, one of dozens of such incidents. However, we have people citing primary sources in BLPs all over the place. Technically an autobiography is a primary source. &larr;]<sup>]</sup> 14:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::And I would also be opposed to mentioning a supposed controversy that someone was involved in if the only source which shows it was a controversial is an autobiography (although this isn't such a big issue as editors claiming something is a controversy based on their intepretation of primary sources when no reliable source has claimed it's a controversy which is what I was talking about). If there are any BLPs you can show which claims a controversy when the only evidence for the controversy is an autobiography, please do remove it or take it up ay ] ] 17:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
=== THIS IS MY LAST ENTRY IN WIKIPEDIA ===
# I would like to thank Jimmy Wales for entertaining my interview last year prior to Wikimania 2.
# I would also like to thank some of the constructive members of the community including Mark_Ryan for originally introducing me to wikipedia.
# However, I cannot and will not go on receiving the blatant and total disrespect of the Wikimedia / Misplaced Pages communities in IRC and continue to sponsor this organization by making posts to it.
# This is all that needs to be said I'm afraid. Nice spending time with you.
# I'm really honestly sorry it has to close like this.
* chrisbradley@noisecontrolpublishing.com
--] 03:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. ] (]) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
== Birthdate again ==


:Errrm, the article opens with: "{{tq|'''Jimmy Donal Wales''' (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname '''Jimbo Wales'''...}}" So that's the 15th word in? ] (]) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Jimmy's profile on ] gives today (August 14th) as his birthday. Is that correct?--] 04:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
::What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! ] (]) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like ]. ] (]) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: ]). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. ] (]) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice ] will be using ] before too long? ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::: {{ping|Martinevans123}} This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described ''enough'' in the sources to be notable. ] (]) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per ], we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? ] (]) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the ] has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. ] (]) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See ] and ] for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. ] (]) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::{{ping|Johnuniq}} I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. ] (]) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::]… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known ''username'' of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. ] (]) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::, took about 20 seconds to find this one. ] (]) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. ] (]) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::<small>Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a ]? But at least we'd get updates . ] (]) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC) </small>
For the next time this comes up, {{user|Encyclopédisme}} was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. ] (]) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


== Hatnote ==
I doubt it. As to the section recently deleted by Squeakbox, rejecting contributions based on the prejudicial history of the contributor rather than the merit of the contribution in question is an assumption of bad faith. The information is correct, is neutral (as it makes no affirmative statement of which date is right), and is properly ]. A discussion of the controversy surrounding his birthdate is certainly notable and encyclopedic, and does not violate the BLP. Futhermore, ] stated that he though removing an affirmative statement of fact about his birthdate was a good idea, not that a neutral, balanced discussion of ''the debate surrounding the issue'' was bad. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


{{u|JLCop}} recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that ] also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at ]. Thoughts? ] ] 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:I think BLP does demand we take the wishes of the subject into consideration and especially in a case like this where it would be controversial for the subject himself to edit the article. I am not convinced that basing an opinion on an editor on their is showing bad faith, and basing myself on Jimbo's "I have had enough" statement and the fact that this is the article on Jimbo (I wouldnt use the block log to comment on this user's edits to otehr article), ] 20:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


:Delete. ] (]) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
::I'm not saying we should ignore what Jimbo wishes, I'm saying that he supported a removal of a controversial fact. The current Controversy section is a well-rounded discussion about the debate, and doesn't make an affirmative statement as to which date is correct. To just leave out a precise date and no explanation of the obviously notable debate over the issue is failing the standards of a complete encyclopedia. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
*] which doesn't seem to have been closed or concluded (first item on the page). ] (]) 13:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
* I removed this before seeing this discussion. This is a clear case of ], as the edit notice itself says. I also removed the hatnote from ], for the same reason. ] ] 03:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
*:Fair enough. Given recent events, I think it's best to stay away from this article going forward just to be on the safe side. I appreciate the input from others in this discussion. ] ] 03:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)


== RfC using ] to link ] and ] ==
:::While I'm in no hurry to uphold JW's right to a quantum indeterminate DoB -- or as Tony S. said, two birthdays like his alleged role model -- I'm struggling to see that this is clearly either controversial or notable, as against the subject being somewhat silly, for no discernible reason. Wouldn't simply a sentence on which to "hang" the assorted sources (in which JW freely contradicts himself self and right) suffice? As opposed to an entire sectionated paragraph, which seems to have something of a "so what?" quality about it. ] 03:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.
::::I agree. People seem to be forgetting that to show something is controversial and relevant, especially in a BLP, you need to provide some evidence in a reliable source for this. The fact that it can be established that something happened is irrelevant. We shouldn't be writing about something using primary sources as our references when our only evidence it's controversial is the opinion of editors. Currently, the only RS I've seen which hints it's controversial is the Britannica thing and perhaps the 'who knows' bit. ] <small>—The preceding {{#ifeq:{{{Date|{{{Time|08:58:45, August 19, 2007}}}}}} | | comment was }} ]{{#ifeq:{{{Date|{{{Time|08:58:45, August 19, 2007}}}}}} | | | &#32;comment was added at {{{Date|{{{Time|08:58:45, August 19, 2007}}}}}} (UTC{{{Zone|{{{3|{{{2|}}}}}}}}}) }}.</small><!-- {{undated}} --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{For|the personal user page and related internal page|User:Jimbo Wales|WP:JIMBO}}
::::: I think that the mention in EB and the article by Rogoway provide enough of a bases that a controversy exists. Plus, primary sources can be used in a BLP if the primary source is the person themselves (e.g. Wales' blog and his statements in his Misplaced Pages Talk page). Since some jokers keep on inserting Aug 8th as Wales' birthday every few months having a section that addresses the birthday issue along with all relevant sources seems pretty useful to me. ] 04:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


There was a ] on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. ] (]) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
== Controversy section - has what he's done really been particularly controversial? ==
* '''Oppose''' per the previous discussion, this is still a blaring ] violation. It shows internal strength to not let our guard down when writing about Misplaced Pages, and instead write the article in the exact same way we would about unrelated subjects. In no other context would it even be conceivable to link to someone's official website at the very top of the article rather than at the bottom in the "external links" section, so we must not do so here. ] ] 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
*:] only applies to ] and not ] though, and this is an internal link, not jimbowales.com which would belong at the bottom. ] (]) 00:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*:: It's only a "internal link" because you're letting your guard down in exactly the way I said not to do. Please read the edit notice: "This article relates to Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that links to non-article namespaces should be treated as external links and not included in the body. Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source, so references to it must comply with WP:ABOUTSELF." ] ] 01:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::That edit notice exists in other pages such as ], ], ], etc and still use hats containing internal links. Do you suggest to remove those hats? ] (]) 10:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @]
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @]
*::::Let's see which is the consensus on this. ] (]) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::::<s>Whoever this Noel Body is, I just don't trust him.</s> Whatevs. ] (]) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::::Per the newly added COI section on my user page, I don't think I'm the best person to be commenting here. ] ] 22:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per Pppery, non-article namespaces are treated as external links in articles related to Misplaced Pages itself. Also, the fact that other pages also use these hats isn't a good argument, and I would suggest also removing them: someone searching for our project page ] most likely isn't going to type ]. ] (] · ]) 23:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)


== Newer 2024 image? ==
The sections in here don't deal with massively controversial issues. This may be an extension of ], but in other biographies it's uncommon to have controversy sections over issues that are as relatively tame as the fact that he hosted erotic material online, that there was a small dispute over who founded the website, and, least important of all, his date of birth. Anyone else? It seems like the article is trying to adhere to NPOV as much as possible to avoid claims of hypocrisy, whereas the negative known aspects of Jimmy's life are quite insignificant.--''']''' <sup>'']''</sup> <sub>''']'''</sub> 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.
:Uh, ] editing of his own wikibio for one thing. Next is the controversy over his downplaying of Bomis' adult content. Last was the controversy surrounding the accuracy of his birthdate. The birthdate thing is very notable because it's a microcosm of the larger debate surrounding Misplaced Pages's reliability; if we can't even get his birthdate right, how accurate is this project? It doesn't just have to be controversial things Jimbo has done, but controversies that center on him. As to the hypocrisy issue, I think the idea that we are being sensationalistic is folly. Surely Jimbo wouldn't hesitate to voice some concern or complaint if he thought this was rumor-mongering? I say, if the subject doesn't have a problem with the content in question, then it can't be doing him "]". ] <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
<gallery>
File:Jimmy Wales in New York City March 2023 blurred cropped.jpg|Current image
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (1).jpg|A
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (2).jpg|B
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (3).jpg|C
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (4).jpg|D
</gallery> ]<sup>(])</sup> 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
:I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – ] (] <b>·</b> ]) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:I agree, the current image is best. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 06:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:Here are a few new options, and I prefer option F 、 option G.
<gallery>
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped).jpg|E
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped 2).jpg|F
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency (cropped).jpg|G
File:Jimmy Wales welcome to Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|H
File:Jimmy Wales in Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|I
File:Jimmy Wales and WikiStipendiya (cropped).jpg|J
</gallery>
:] (]) 12:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


:F is great. No odd facial expression, everything well. ] (]) 22:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::All of the things mentioned..... Bomis, the co-founder debate, and Wales' birthday are all aspects of the controversy that arose from Wales' conflict of interest editing. You can't discuss that controversy without mentioning these aspects..... the DOB is just the latest, and silliest, outgrowth of this debate. Of course, the DOB thing wouldn't even be a controversy if Mr. Wales would just tell people when his birth is instead of telling people when it is not or going around saying "Nobody knows...". ] 23:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
:I prefer the '''current image'''. It looks like a professional headshot, has the best facial expression of all of these, and is fresh enough to not be out of date. –] <small>(])</small> 06:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:07, 15 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jimmy Wales article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Former good article nomineeJimmy Wales was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2005Articles for deletionKept
August 14, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 31, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
March 25, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 5, 2017Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
Current status: Former good article nominee
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Misplaced Pages.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternet culture High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconChicago Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing: Websites Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBusiness Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Indiana Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconAlabama
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconSpoken Misplaced Pages
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Misplaced Pages
WikiProject iconObjectivism (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism
WikiProject iconOpen (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This talk page is only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales.
The contents of the Jimmy Wales Foundation page were merged into Jimmy Wales on 14 December 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.


Date/age issue

There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. Timothy Cooper (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

That Daily Beast source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, The News Courier, either original or archived, so can't see what it says. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123 Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3.  Mystery Merrivale  (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Jimbo

Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Errrm, the article opens with: "Jimmy Donal Wales (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname Jimbo Wales..." So that's the 15th word in? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like a dictatorship. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: Dictatorship of neo-socialism). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice Mr Musk will be using "X" before too long? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described enough in the sources to be notable. Encyclopédisme (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per WP:BRD, we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the Misplaced Pages:Glossary has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. Encyclopédisme (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See WP:NOTBURO and WP:IAR for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. Johnuniq (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
@Johnuniq: I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Ignore every single rule… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known username of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
New Scientist Jimbo nickname source, took about 20 seconds to find this one. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. Encyclopédisme (talk) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a dictatorship? But at least we'd get updates 25 times a day. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

For the next time this comes up, Encyclopédisme (talk · contribs) was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. Johnuniq (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hatnote

JLCop recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that Steven Pruitt also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at List of Misplaced Pages people. Thoughts? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete. JLCop (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

RfC using Template:For to link User:Jimbo Wales and WP:JIMBO

I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.

For the personal user page and related internal page, see User:Jimbo Wales and WP:JIMBO.

There was a previous discussion on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Newer 2024 image?

Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.

  • Current image Current image
  • A A
  • B B
  • C C
  • D D

Nursultan Malik 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – Anne drew (talk · contribs) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I agree, the current image is best. - FlightTime (open channel) 06:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Here are a few new options, and I prefer option F 、 option G.
  • E E
  • F F
  • G G
  • H H
  • I I
  • J J
Nagae Iku (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
F is great. No odd facial expression, everything well. Nurken (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I prefer the current image. It looks like a professional headshot, has the best facial expression of all of these, and is fresh enough to not be out of date. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: