Misplaced Pages

User talk:219.90.223.197: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:28, 1 September 2007 editNotjake13 (talk | contribs)5,475 editsm typo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:26, 10 January 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Blanked IP talk}}
==]==
{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] 02:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

:Your edits to the Skin article have been entirely undiscussed, extremely opinionated, and very unencyclopedic. Please utilize the discussion page before taking matters into your own hands. Each issue should be addressed individually with a discussion and the input of several opinions on how to best fit the article to Misplaced Pages policies, while keeping it informative. Further edits will be considered vandalism if no discussion takes place. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a personal fanpage. --] 02:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

::{{uw-vandalism3}} --] 02:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

:::As far as sourcing goes on the Skin page, please see ], ], and the ]. Reading these policies thoroughly should provide better understanding. Another important issue is the supergroup labelling. Please read the page on ]s, and you should see that the band meets the criteria for such categorization. You've engaged in revert warring and you have NOT utilized the talk page for the article. You MUST use the talk page and MUST come to consensus before making major changes. --] 02:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Many people have removed your editing, the article had a poor layout, contained nonsense, and was in general poorly written.
Reasons were given when changing the article in a major way, you refuse to provide any source for your information, why it was poorly written, and in general avoid all questions.

:Many anonymous users editing a page to read like a fansite does not constitute a change in entire policies. The article being "poorly written" is quite a subjective statement. The article meets many of Wikipedias policies and is maintained by many reliable editors with a reputable background in article composition. The layout is standard, and while it may not yet be aesthetically pleasing, there is not a thing wrong with it, and it will continue to become easier on the eyes as more information is available ot create a significant article body.

:Your claims of no citations are entirely false, as the article contained numerous citations previous to your vandalism, and you have yet to reincorporate those citations into your current edit. You have yet to even attempta a civil discussion on the article talk page, and you continue to engage in revert warring. It will be extremely helpful if you register for a free Misplaced Pages account, rather than remainign anonymous and unknown, as you could be (no accusations are inentional) the same person as one or more of the previous vandals present on the Skin article. For more credibility, register or log in to a Misplaced Pages account, and remain respectful and civil when editing articles. You may want to also refer to the policies I have provided above to understand the reasoning the article was written the way it was, as you have broken many policies. The issues that need addressing are the supergroup status, the "Visual Kei" labeling, and the removal of large amounts of content and citations. --] 04:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:26, 10 January 2023

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.