Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Messianic Jewish Rabbinical Council: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:43, 6 September 2007 editMPerel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,056 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:48, 30 July 2023 edit undoJJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,666,242 editsm Merging Category:Jewish Christianity editorial disputes to Category:WikiProject Jewish Christianity per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 9#Category:Jewish Christianity editorial disputes 
(39 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. To be completely clear, I am discounting somewhat the "numbers" argument here - I think that there is a reasonable consensus that the page should be deleted. Further, several users who expressed a "keep" opinion seem to have had little to no contributions outside this topic, and I have marked them as such besides their comments in this discussion, especially because of the possibility of ]. ]<sup>'''('''<span class="plainlinks">].</span>''')'''</sup> 16:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}


:{{la|Messianic Jewish Rabbinical Council}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Messianic Jewish Rabbinical Council}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Unsourced (independant sources) unnoteable organazation. Google searches return scant WP mirror sites. ] 03:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Unsourced (independant sources) unnoteable organazation. Google searches return scant WP mirror sites. ] 03:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. --] 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC) <s>*'''Delete''' per above. --] 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)</s> Blocked sockpupetear.
*'''Delete''' unless ] from ], ] are found ] 05:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''' unless ] from ], ] are found ] 05:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - article fails to establish notability. ] 06:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - article fails to establish notability. ] 06:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', there appears to be no ] verifying this organization actually exists, much less showing it is notable enough to warrant an article. --] 06:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''', there appears to be no ] verifying this organization actually exists, much less showing it is notable enough to warrant an article. --] 06:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' There are a great number of small organizations like this one. None of them seem to agree with each other enough to join forces and make one large organization. They all seem to want to be leaders, and none of them want to risk giving leadership authority to anyone else. None of these organizations has had a significant impact on anyone outside their own small circles. That's why they tend to be non-notable, like this one. ] 07:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per above. ] ] 17:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''KEEP''' The organization plays a vital role for what they do although they are not very well known to the general public. Their web site link is one the page. Contact them using the web form if you think they are not who they claim to be. I see no Messianic group coming here to refute their page. They themselves are the reliable source. They know who they are.] 18:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC) <small>— ] (]&#32;• ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small>
:*'''Comment''' It's not a question of whether or not the article is a hoax. It's a question of whether or not they meet this ] for notability. They don't appear to. If you have reliable sources that suggest otherwise, please add them to the article. Best, --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 22:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' The guidelines are not "set in stone", as is noted within them. This organization should be listed.] 01:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC) <small>— ] (]&#32;• ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Delete'''. Non-notable organisation. ] 22:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' for lack of ] and ]. --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 22:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Do Not Delete''' This article is the target of an organized attempt to expunge all Messianic articles from Misplaced Pages by people who just don't like Messianics. ] 23:00, 6 September 2007 <small>— ] (]&#32;• ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 06:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
* '''Strong Keep''' if we would require external ''third party'' links from all the main stream Jewish articles, it would be fare to ask here as well for third party links. If this gets deleted simply because the main stream Jews r dismissing this article in our open POV agenda against Messianic articles how could we claim that we are a neutral encyclopedia?!--] 11:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
* <sup>(copied from the subject's talk page--] 14:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC) )</sup> '''KEEP''' -- the organization is a watershed for the messianic movement] 14:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC) <small>— ] (]&#32;• ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] <small>(])</small> 14:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per nom. ] 15:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
<noinclude>
]
</noinclude>
*'''Comment''' Misplaced Pages requires independent ] sufficient to ] basic information about articles and establish that the subject is ]. Let's not get distracted from these basic Misplaced Pages requirements. I believe these requirements are somewhat, but not completely, modified for religious organizations. We can rely on a religious organization's own sources for statements about matters such as what they believe and who their leadership is. But we can't rely on a religious organization's own sources for proof that the organization is itself notable. We need outside sources to show that. If, as ] says, "the organization is a watershed for the messianic movement", doubtless people will have talked about it and sources shouldn't be difficult to find. Best, --] 05:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
<s>*'''Delete''' per nom.--] 08:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)</s> this user is the same as user yeshivish--] 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
<s>*'''Delete''' per ]--] 17:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)</s> this user is also user yeshivish--] 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge'' to ], the parent organization. I don't find evidence of independent notability. ] 03:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete''' I'd modify the standard a little further than Shirahadasha--the only way to avoid bias is to include any religious organisation with a real existence and any demonstration of notability--but there is no third party sources for this at all. Np bias against re-creation if something is found. ''']''' (]) 03:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
*KEEP <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 08:48, 30 July 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. To be completely clear, I am discounting somewhat the "numbers" argument here - I think that there is a reasonable consensus that the page should be deleted. Further, several users who expressed a "keep" opinion seem to have had little to no contributions outside this topic, and I have marked them as such besides their comments in this discussion, especially because of the possibility of sock puppetry. Nihiltres 16:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Messianic Jewish Rabbinical Council

Messianic Jewish Rabbinical Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced (independant sources) unnoteable organazation. Google searches return scant WP mirror sites. Yeshivish 03:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC) *Delete per above. --Yeshivish 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Blocked sockpupetear.

  • Comment Misplaced Pages requires independent reliable sources sufficient to verify basic information about articles and establish that the subject is notable. Let's not get distracted from these basic Misplaced Pages requirements. I believe these requirements are somewhat, but not completely, modified for religious organizations. We can rely on a religious organization's own sources for statements about matters such as what they believe and who their leadership is. But we can't rely on a religious organization's own sources for proof that the organization is itself notable. We need outside sources to show that. If, as GracieRuth says, "the organization is a watershed for the messianic movement", doubtless people will have talked about it and sources shouldn't be difficult to find. Best, --Shirahadasha 05:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

*Delete per nom.--Miamite 08:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC) this user is the same as user yeshivish--יודל 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC) *Delete per Yeshivish--Truest blue 17:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC) this user is also user yeshivish--יודל 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category: