| Revision as of 22:42, 8 September 2007 editEpbr123 (talk | contribs)291,700 edits →Kianna Dior← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:04, 2 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete'''. No sourced claims for notability, ] per otherwise. The naked assertion that she is "well-known" or "really famous" is not enough. ] 19:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|b}} | |||
| :{{la|Kianna Dior}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Kianna Dior}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 20: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. She is really a famous porn star. ] 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. She is really a famous porn star. ] 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| **Fame doesn't equal notability. ] 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | **Fame doesn't equal notability. ] 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *** '''Comment:''' Vote and above reply recovered from unwarranted deletion by ]. It is no one's place to ''remove'' other people's comments; the closing admin must take into consideration all votes. Higher quality votes with substance, of course, have more weight then non-quality votes, since AfD is not a vote. -- ] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">]</sup> 14:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 14:04, 2 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. No sourced claims for notability, WP:PORNBIO per otherwise. The naked assertion that she is "well-known" or "really famous" is not enough. Eluchil404 19:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Kianna Dior
Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I disagree; she meets WP:PORNBIO. Xihr 20:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, right. How? Epbr123 20:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Being "well-known" and making plenty of movies isn't in the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Epbr123 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability presented. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. She is really a famous porn star. UnknownMan 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fame doesn't equal notability. Epbr123 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Vote and above reply recovered from unwarranted deletion by User:Picaroon. It is no one's place to remove other people's comments; the closing admin must take into consideration all votes. Higher quality votes with substance, of course, have more weight then non-quality votes, since AfD is not a vote. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 14:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fame doesn't equal notability. Epbr123 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.