Misplaced Pages

User talk:Matthead: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:49, 27 September 2007 editSpace Cadet (talk | contribs)8,095 editsm →Non-aggression Pact← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:58, 26 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,834 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Matthead/Archive2010) (botTag: Manual revert 
(719 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=7|target=./Archive2007|dounreplied=yes|index=./Archive index|bot=Werdnabot|botlink=User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Howto}}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Matthead/Archive2007--><!--werdnabot-index User talk:Matthead/Archive index--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(7d)
⚫ |archive = User talk:Matthead/Archive2010
}}


{{Archive box|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}
⚫ ]


== ] & Signpost ==
== Copernicus ==


{{Signpost-subscription}}
Did you read Matthead the question in "German or English Engineer"--] 03:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
{{DYK}}
== ]: Voting now open! ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Matthead. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Your edit probably isn't bad but you should provide an explanation at ] because it's a controversial article and that would set a good precedent. ] 23:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Map ==
Yeah that was me. To lazy to log in ;). --] 15:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''.
== Blocked for 48 hours ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 -->
You've been blocked for 3RR. You responded to the report ], so you've already seen the evidence. No matter how in the right you believe you are, edit warring is still a blockable offense. --] - '']'' - ] 13:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
:Not if it fights vandalism. Too bad you blocked me so quick that I had no time to illustrate my view. Please look at , which compares my edits of today, implementing the good suggestions of others, with the consensus of the last few days, maintained by at least 5 editors other than me. This version was approved by a stating "The history section looks great!" '''before''' Piotrus mangled it. He started his editwarring attack in order to push his POV into the article before it gets GA status. I've neutralized that within 3RR. He then was followed by Szopen (what a coincidence!), who also did 3RR, which I deliberately neutralized to protect the consensus of the last days - while merging in good faith edits in the process. Piotrus and Szopen obviously were willing to go to the limit of the rules, 1RR was not enough for them. Piotrus, who was repeatedly under scrutiny himself, predictably reported me for 3RR . You reverted to the last version by Szopen - are you not confident that other, uninvolved editors would take care of that if necessary? --&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 14:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

::This is a ''content dispute'', not ''overt vandalism'', so that argument simply doesn't hold water. Finally, I reverted your final edit(s) to the page, not because I have any opinion in the content dispute, but only to revert the extreme abuse committed by the blocked user: you. --] - '']'' - ] 14:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

:::As per ] "reverts to conform with community consensus on geographic names which fall within the scope of the Gdansk Vote" are excepted. ] was as ] part of German-speaking ] for about 100 years, a fact which Piotrus tried to conceal by erasing large part from the history section, as well as <nowiki>{{lang-de|Krakau}}</nowiki> from the intro.--&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 14:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

::::] is about Gdańsk, not Kraków. Austria is not Germany. The community consensus was against ''you''. The edit war was about more then mere naming. Gdańsk/Vote is not applicable here, please don't abuse it in attempt to gain 3RR immunity.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 16:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

{{unblockreviewed|1=As per 3RR exceptions, "reverts to conform with community consensus on geographic names which fall within the scope of the Gdansk Vote" are permitted. See my reasoning given above, Piotrus and Szopen erased not only the German language name Krakau, but also large parts of the history section|decline=I have had a look with fresh eyes at the subject of this dispute and I have come to the conclusion that your invocation of the Gdansk vote is an attempt to 'game the system' of the three revert rule. This is a simple content dispute and you were engaging in a revert war about it, which is precisely what the three revert rule is there to stop. The block is appropriate. ] 14:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)}}


*'''Support block''' of Matthead (as if my opinion mattered) as his long time record speaks for itself - and against him. Denying centuries of Polish history by pushing German POV over it is Matthead's only agenda. As long as he is around, development of the German-Polish-related topics on Misplaced Pages will stagnate as his behaviour is driving away good faith editors. After all this time he's been here, it should be him who is made to go elsewhere, e.g. to the Wiki articles covering modern Germany (or motor sports). Sincerely ] 14:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

:: How flattering, Space Cadet is copying to the recent ] on the Community sanction noticeboard. --&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 15:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
:::Of course! I always try to learn from Great Masters. ] 15:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)<br>P.S. I corrected your German ''oder'' into English ''or''. Don't thank me or anything.
::::] is German, indeed.--&nbsp;]&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp; &nbsp; 16:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
:::::You mean as a river? Keep dreaming! ] 16:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

== Curiosity question ==
What city are you from? Stuttgart maybe? Why do I care? Nothing really, I just had a drinking buddy from Stuttgart ages ago, before the WIKI, when I was still "on the sauce". ] 16:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

==Non-aggression Pact==
How about we both commit not to:
*call each other names
*portray one another as a nationalist
*criticize each other's personality and/or mental capabilities
*revert each other without satisfactory explanation on a respective Talk page
*interfere with each other's block/ban processes <br>
You can come up with more and I will carefully evaluate them. Why am I doing this? Well, despite our past differences, I hate to see a fellow Wikipedian being blocked. If our Non-aggression Pact works, you may consider a similar pact with Piotrus and maybe even others. That would drastically limit (IMHO) your risk of being blocked again. Your wanna be friend ] 16:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:58, 26 November 2024


Archives

User talk:Matthead/Archive2006
User talk:Matthead/Archive2007
User talk:Matthead/Archive2008
User talk:Matthead/Archive2009
User talk:Matthead/Archive2010


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Did you know & Signpost

The Signpost
24 December 2024
Adoration of the Magi in the SnowAdoration of the Magi in the Snow

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Matthead. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.