| Revision as of 14:47, 12 October 2007 view sourceMarvin Diode (talk | contribs)1,756 edits →Well done← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:06, 23 August 2008 view source Thatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:Thatcher/Alpha": possibly not needed |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 125K |
|
|
|counter = 15 |
|
|
|algo = old(2d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Thatcher131/Archive%(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard" style=background:{{{bgcol|#FFFF99}}} |
|
|
|- style=text-align:center |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| I am currently very busy in real life. I will check here and respond to questions about my own actions and edits, but I will not respond to requests for assistance on other matters. Please see the appropriate noticeboard for assistance. Thank you for your understanding. |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{editabuselinks}} |
|
{{editabuselinks}} |
|
|
{{User:Thatcher/Links}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== History archive == |
|
{{User:Thatcher131/Piggybank}} |
|
|
|
This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. ] 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
First let me say that I trust your good faith judgment as an admin in unblocking Tweety21. But I have some concerns. She appears to be removing whois templates from anonymous talk pages, specifically ]. I am assuming it is Tweety21, but there is some uncertainty because she continues to edit anonymously as best I can tell, including from ]. She also appears to have removed (without admin permission that I know of) content from ] while editing under ]. I am trying to figure out whether she has been given permission to do some of these things, or whether she is up to her vandalism tricks again. Thanks. ] 17:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
== Ward == |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please help me Ward continues to display my work address, I believe he is on a rampage as a result of me not keeping blocked, this display of my address puts my safety at risk...I dont understand why he is harassing me, will email admin as well as this violates wiki privacy policy. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
:Tweety21, whois information is ''not a violation of privacy''. You are continuing to edit while not signed in. If you want to stop being associated with an IP address, '''''stop editing while not signed in''''' and stop blanking the publicly available whois information from talk pages. You have been told this over and over and over again. --] 17:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Comment from ]=== |
|
|
:This is what I and admin Yamla put on her talk page: |
|
|
|
|
|
::"''You have no right to be displaying work place id'' |
|
|
:::You have no right to remove a whois template that is not on your talk page, if it is you who is doing it. As you have been told over and over again, '''don't edit anonymously''' -- sign in as Tweety21. The whois template is perfectly appropriate for the page of an ''anonymous'' IP, unless removed by an admin. |
|
|
::"''I belive you are just doing this as you are ticked I got unlblocked''" |
|
|
:::That's your opinion. Your saying it doesn't make it true. I'm following Misplaced Pages policies. This is not a personal issue toward you, as you are often inclined to conclude without justification. |
|
|
::"''will be putting in a wiki-alert''" |
|
|
:::That's your choice. I have not violated any Misplaced Pages policies. Just be ''very careful'' you don't make any false allegations (something else you have a history of doing) because I will not tolerate it, and I will go straight to the admin who unblocked you with the evidence. |
|
|
::"''pick on someone else''" |
|
|
:::I'm not picking on anyone. I challenge anyone when they violate Misplaced Pages policy. You're not getting any special attention. ] 17:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Tweety21, please note that you have previously been warned about this. This is considered vandalism. If you continue, I will block you again. Stop removing the whois information from IP talk pages. This is your final warning. The whois information is freely available and is under no circumstances a privacy violation. Additionally, if you continue editing while not signed in, you are continuing to disclose your place of business and/or your location. --] 17:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tired of hearing about her yet? == |
|
|
|
|
|
If you find yourself with some spare time, I compiled ] of Tweety21's edits (including her various IPs and socks). I've included proof of !vote-stacking, vandalism, and so on. I have had it with her baseless accusations and lies, so rather than rant on and on, I'll let her actions be the proof. ] 23:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== RfD nomination of ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have nominated {{la|WP:RFAR/MONGO}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 16:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Request appeal == |
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to submit an appeal. User name at the time Tommysun Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 21:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Well, you haven't been banned from editing in general, just from some articles, so you are free to post your own appeal; list it as a new case at the top of ] titled "Appeal by Tommysun" or some such and make a case for the Arbitrators to consider. ] 14:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Well done == |
|
|
|
|
|
. ] 23:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Seeking your advice again== |
|
|
|
|
|
I am contemplating a request for arbitration on the matter of Dking and Cberlet. I have a question about timing -- Cberlet has just announced that he is taking a one month break, at which point Dking, who has been absent, commences a new frenzy of POV pushing. They seem to take turns. Is it necessary or proper to wait to file with the ArbCom until both of them are active at the same time? Also, would it be appropriate to include Will Beback in the case, since he is always involved in some way to defend their activities? Thanks in advance. --] 14:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. Thatcher 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)