Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jack Merridew: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:26, 19 October 2007 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,674 editsm Reverted edits by 68.31.253.96 (talk) to last version by JuJube← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,870 edits Notification: listing of Bigun at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
This user's current account is;
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #e8dae7; border: 1px solid #976684; vertical-align: top;"
| style="width: 69%; background-color: #fff4fa; border: 1px solid #976684; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="2" |


{{softredirect|User:Br'er Rabbit}} ; )
* ]
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Daria ==
<blockquote>This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails ] due to ] in ], ] sources. Its products fail the ] and the ] on the same basis.</blockquote>
Added a comment about notability issues & the need to redirect ]. What shall we do about Farscape? ] 19:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
: I'll look. I'll look at Farscape, too. I haven't redirected any of them yet... guess I'm due. --] 10:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
:: Hi Jack, we should figure out a remedy here. The protection is not an endorsement of one or another solution - it is simply to eliminate edit warring and will have to decided one way or the other. I am having the same issues with another misguided but committed editor at the Friends page - someone who's fandom simply impedes their ability to recognise what does and does not constitute notability. This is not going to be resolved on talk pages, especially given how much some people care about (especially) Farscape, but other series too (and in that vein ] is upcoming). There is going to remain a refusal to accept global ] and instead insist upon the local consensus of a few committed enthusiasts. Hence, I recommend an RFC, perhaps framed globally (perhaps drawn from Whitecat's forum-shopping mission against TTN @ AN/I) followed almost certainly by arbitration. At least we can get a mandate one way or the other. What do you think? K, I'm off to traipse around the woods now. ] 15:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial">] ]</span>''' 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
::: Oh, I see that is was just an accident of timing that locked the pages as redirects. See what the regulars say on the Farscape talk page. And have a talk with ] there.


: Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --] (]) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
::: We were recommended to use the formal dispute resolution process — which I would need to read-up on. Sounds messy. You saw that White Cat had a whole separate issue with disruption about deleting categories? — further down on the AN/I page. To file an RFC, I would think we need someone experience with the process. I'll look at the help pages on this tomorrow, or so. --] 15:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


{{User QAIbox
== Regarding your comment ==
| title = Awesome

| image = Cscr-featured.svg
So very true. This is one of the things we want to address with the ] rewrite. Keep your eyes open, some interesting changes will be coming this way. ] may be addressing the symptoms, but I believe the problem lies much deeper: sub-articles are created from scratch, instead of developing as part of the mother article, and then being split off properly — sources and all. Regards, <font face="Brush Script MT" size="4">] </font> 17:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
| image_upright = 0.35
: Thanks. I've noticed that there has been much discussion about rewriting those, but I have not had time to keep up with all the talk. I'll try and show up there more. --] 10:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
| bold = ]
::Currently we are still drafting the next part on my talk page, but once we are happy with it, we will present it on WT:WAF again (WT:WAF will be rather silent until then), I will let you know at that time. <font face="Brush Script MT" size="4">] </font> 11:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
}}

--] (]) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
== ]s ==
== "Bigun" listed at ] ==
Please bring back the page I just spent several hours working on that your redirect has just erased from existence. ] 17:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6#Bigun}} until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
:The article is gone per ] — I just made it a redirect for convenience. --] 17:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

:: That was the OLD article that was slated for deletion. I'd created a new one that you obviously didn't even bother to check ] 17:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

==Images==
Thanks, but it depends who you ask! I took a look and agree they are suspicious, especially as at least one of these images is also found elsewhere on the Internet. I left a note on his talk page asking for other images from the same show in higher resolution. I would think from all of the rhetoric he'd be happy to prove you wrong. --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;]|]|]&nbsp;</span>''' 20:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023

This user's current account is;

Soft redirect to:User:Br'er Rabbit
This page is a soft redirect. ; )

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses

User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic

User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Body text

User:Jack Merridew/Body text, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Body text and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Body text during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch

User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes

User:Jack Merridew/Quotes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quotes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1

Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mobile payments in Indonesia

Notice

The article Mobile payments in Indonesia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails corporate notability guidelines due to insufficient depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources. Its products fail the product notability guidelines and the general notability guideline on the same basis.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

"Bigun" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigun and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Bigun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Category: