| Revision as of 08:42, 28 October 2007 view sourceDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,520 edits +← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:40, 12 July 2024 view source Z1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,320 edits Road to Rupert listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| == Unbanned == | |||
| == Needs a Retired Sign == | |||
| I'm pleased to tell you that you have been unbanned by the community and you free free to edit. However please be aware that you have been placed on civility parole for one year. If you make any edits which are judged by any administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, provocative in nature, ], or ] in nature, then you may be blocked for a period up to one week at the blocking administrator's discretion. After five such blocks, the maximum block time is increased to one year. '''Further to that''' - you are to enter a mentorship scheme, and I shall be your mentor - please don't let me down. ] 02:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :There appeared to be some duplicative text in the original comment by Ryan, so I think I fixed it. See history of changes. ''']''' 08:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Can a administrator put a retired sign on the user page using the following template:<br/><nowiki>{{retired|date= April 2009}}</nowiki> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 04:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:40, 12 July 2024
Redirect to:
Needs a Retired Sign
Can a administrator put a retired sign on the user page using the following template:
{{retired|date= April 2009}}
Good article reassessment for Road to Rupert
Road to Rupert has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)