| Revision as of 20:34, 29 October 2007 editSignshare (talk | contribs)2,279 edits →Signshare← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:02, 30 October 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,873 edits not around since March 2019 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=17 March 2019}} | |||
| {{archive box collapsible|] ] ]}} | |||
| {{semi-retired}} | |||
| ==I'm back== | |||
| I now archive my own page manually since I had some trouble with some archive bots. | |||
| But in a reduced capacity. I don't really have a role anymore and I definitely won't be making a conscious effort to involve myself deeper with Misplaced Pages. I've moved on in my life but I still have a fondness for Misplaced Pages and some of its users. ]] 21:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Basic rules for my talk page are as follows: | |||
| :Welcome back! ]] 04:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *If I have made a mistake and you are pretty darn angry about it... just relax and take a breath before screaming at me. Please don't forget this is just an ] and we are all humans and we all make mistakes. | |||
| *No internet abbreviation's (Apart from 'btw') - I can't stand them. | |||
| *Standard English only... I don't understand things like: "da pony tr1ppd an feled an urt 1ts ne's" | |||
| *Keep foul language within reason and not directed at anyone (Unless they have been naughty). | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Adoption== | |||
| Welcome back loser :P ] (]) 08:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| oh yes please. at the moment i'm pretty much lost so any help would be much appreciated. thanks ] 08:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ta to you both! ]] 20:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks for that. It'll help me get used to talk and discussion me thinks. ] 09:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Welcome back to one the greatest! == | |||
| Wiki is still overpopulated with completely useless whiners (like every single editor who ever complained about you :-D ) Stick around for a while....the Wik needs you and more like you. Frozen in solid on the East Coast all Winter is giving me the blues. And now I read that Gary Moore has died. So I will be in Moore blues for a while to come. No UK trips in my future. Maybe someday. ] (]) 19:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Actually we share a lot of common interests!! i was looking through your user page and its odd how many of your (templates? info boxes?) rectangles-with-words-and-a-picture i'll be copying. I'll probably be updating my page for the rest of the day. and bugging you for help and tips so thanks in advance for your help and patience. ] 10:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ha, you're too kind to me, my old friend. MK one day, promise? ]] 20:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Foo Fighters == | |||
| well acting is a bit of a strong word for what i do. i try occasionally but i'm not very good. much better at the technical or production side of things. but acting is good for a laugh now and then. ] 10:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thought I would discuss this first rather than just revert, because really, it's not a big issue. I agree with the hidden note that because of the amount of bands the members have been a member of/contributed to, it should be limited. At the same time though, surely ] and ] are directly related, even with only one member in common? Both were formed while Foos were active and feature current members. The Coattail Riders have released 2 albums, while TCV plan on releasing a second. , , , | |||
| :Easier said than done. Well for me anyway. I've been to Claire once. Stayed in Doolin for a little while. its a nice place. | |||
| Also, I couldn't find anything about the note on the ] (archives included). I'm assuming it was added due to editors constantly adding groups like ], ], etc? I don't think the note should apply to the aforementioned band's, though that's just my opinion. What do you think? :) {{Small|] (]) 14:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)}} | |||
| right. i'm at a loss as to how to put in userboxes. well i know how the work i just need to find a list of them. for instance i can't find where the code for the native level of english box is. ] 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I think an old user added it years ago, I can't even remember. Chris-something... He used to be really active on the Nirvana band page. Um... I would recommend bringing this to the talk page for a wider consensus. To be honest, I've just been trying to stick to the note, although if you think a differently worded one would make more sense, feel free to suggest. Cheers for your message, bro. ]] 09:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah Ha. Found it. Cheers. ] 13:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah ok, was going to do that, but thought I would ask yourselfm incase I missed anything on the talk page about the note. Thanks for the reply! {{Small|] (]) 13:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Welcome back== | |||
| howdy. i've just run into a bit of trouble, well more like confusion really with this page, http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Skunk_Fu%21_characters.jpg i'm not sure how an image made available for free download stands in the licensing options. ] 08:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'm so behind... Welcome back! Have a cookie. ] ] 08:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, Rory! ]] 23:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==So... wadaya think?... == | |||
| ...about this feller ]. I smell self-promo... and lilely some bigtime copyvio from a personal website too. Thoughts? ] 14:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == User Fasttimes68 is still causing problems with the article on ] == | |||
| ::Ehile I have your attention... and if someone else has't done it already... could you rv . Its a prot page so I can't touch it. ] 17:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you visit the Stephanie Adams discussion page, you will see people asking him to stop, but he still insists upon causing trouble. | |||
| Thanks for reverting dinglenut's '''Twinkle violation'''. Editors shouldn't be allowed access the tools unless they prove they know how to use them. That's why I always liked VP... it's moderated... you have to apply to use it... you're judged on your edit history... and it can be taken away if you F**k around with it. Have a nice day! ] 14:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_1992 | |||
| ==Lifted music== | |||
| Here are a few additional links as well: | |||
| just to let you know that the page is up now, thanks for all your help :). Still have to sort out the logo since i had a message from a bot, but it should be ok. | |||
| cheers, take it easy!!] 19:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive717#User:Fasttimes68_topic_ban_proposal | |||
| == ] == | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive93#Fasttimes68_reported_by_Therefore_.28Result:_24hr_block_.29 | |||
| Thanks, yup, I love him in Scrubs, he is great. ] 02:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| He and user Hoary were the two who caused problem with that article for over five years, which is why it is currently being redirected, yet it's still an issue to them, even with only one sentence in the article. Major conflict of interest going on... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Another 'self-promo' for your amusement == | |||
| Check out ]. Very "look at me, look at me" ] 14:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You are certainly fast!!! I barely had time to go get a coffee! I acutally discovered that one by A) Looking at ]<small>one of the words that is used as a cruft adjective WAY too much on Wiki</small> and then B)click on the "what links here" left hand link.... you will be whisked away to AfD and Speedy D heaven :D . Crufters, never beens and never will be's LOVE to label themselves as virtuosos. And that word links to over 400 pages. Some are legit subjects that just need to have the word virtuoso deleted from their article... since 99% of the time it's unreferenced and being used as an adjective. BUT... many of Wiki's virtuosos are absolute NN material and the virtuoso link makes it easy to find them. I have lots of experience finding these hacks... in fact... you could say I am a virtuoso at it ''':D''' ] 14:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== A barnstar for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Hello. I've seen you participate several times in RfAs where your comments have been "'''Oppose''' per X. Sorry". These are ''really'' not constructive comments. Maybe you should make up some original comments and suggestions about how the candidate can improve and ultimately become an admin and help out more around here. This would greatly help the user and Misplaced Pages in general. Happy editing! Regards, ''']]]''' 22:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| :No thank you :-) I shall continue to Oppose and Support RfA's anyway I wish. It is '''completely''' up to users how they support or oppose an RfA. Some user's don't even leave comments, are you going to suggest to them to be more constructive too? Allow me to explain, by the time I reach an RfA the points that I want to make have already been made and it saves me a lot of time rather than just repeating something. So, thank you very much for your helpful suggestion, friend :-) - But, no. ]] 22:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Civility Barnstar''' | |||
| ::"''Are you going to suggest to them to be more constructive too?''" Yes. "''By the time I reach an RfA the points that I want to make have already been made and it saves me a lot of time rather than just repeating something.''" I understand that you've never gone through an RfA, but let me tell you that it is a really unpleasant experience, even it is successful. Piling on nonconstructive opposes does not help the candidate in any way. But, whatev. --''']]]''' 22:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Buddy, I understand how frustrating it must be and I am sorry. Look - I'll compromise, next time I Support or Oppose an RfA I'll write my own reason, alright? But you gotta take notice that people get offended if you tell them what to do. Even if you smile sweetly and be all nice about it, people are still going to irritated if you tell them how to support or oppose an RfA. Take care and good luck with your RfA, friend. ]] 22:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It's not my fault that people can't take good-faith suggestions nicely and must always be offended by every single comment made about them. --''']]]''' 23:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No! Of course I understood and recognised it to be in good faith... '''but'''... I was just telling you something about psychology. People simply get annoyed if you tell them what to do, especially if it's something they've written. People tend to take what they've written and care for it like a child (We've all had brush in's with editor's on Misplaced Pages ;-). So you just gotta be extra careful in the future when you go and tell people to be more constructive with Opposes or Support's or whatever. Okay? Are we cool now, friend? ]] 23:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Sure, thanks :-) Guess that's just how seriously screwed our society is. --''']]]''' 23:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ha! thanks :) == | |||
| Thanks for removing the vandal's warning -- I could've sworn I'd done that, but it must've just slipped the mind. I blame the nature of vandal-fighting for my absentmindedness. ;o) ] 23:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, this is Drow Elf. I'd like to thank you for correcting me on my American/English spelling. I can spot commonly misspelled words pretty well, but I guess it just didn't occur to me that people in England would be editing Misplaced Pages too. Stupid me. Anyway, I think I corrected the word "encyclopedia" from its British spelling somewhere on this site. I need to try and fix that. Thanks again! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Keep your eyeballs peeled == | |||
| that's been bombed in twise on the ] article. Check out the edit summary the first time it was dropped.... total fanboy/fannyboy(<small>whichever :D</small>) crufting. Almost as bad as inclusionists :D . ] 15:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My recent RfA == | |||
| I am sorry you felt it necessary to oppose my RfA, which did not succeed, at this time. I will attempt to make some more mainspace edits and get some more experience before my next RfA, which will be in two month's time. I hope I will have satisfied your concerns by then, but if not, please comment as you feel you should. Thanks for participating in my RfA. -- ]<sup>(]|]|]|])</sup> 07:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#00FFFF}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Adopting Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |For adopting a user I Swirlex give you this adopting Barnstar. | |||
| |} | |||
| You are welcome and deserve it.] 10:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi! I rejected the ] request because in its current state the article content does not appear to be blatant advertising under ] G11. It is a brief and relatively modest description of the company. The article asserts notability and the company appears to be of sufficient size and scope that it is not obviously non-notable. Speedy deletion is not the appropriate avenue in such cases, please use ] to determine if the article should be deleted. --] 03:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for your note. I realize when you first saw the article it was pretty blatantly advertising for the company and the puffery part was cut down to size by another user. Perhaps that is a route that could be taken if an article on a potentially notable company contains puffery. You can also notify ] if you notice puffery being added by someone connected with the organization. Thanks for your efforts. Best, --] 16:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == One for your review == | |||
| Tripped over ]. Stuffed a prod on it. Perhaps a more stern fate should be administered. What are your thoughts? ] 17:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for your input. Now... how 'bout ]. IT's early... it could just be that its VERY poor article quality makes it seems worse than it really is. ] 08:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::The article is a pile of dump. He is ''known'' but not that well known. This one has a bigger chance of being kicked off than that Eastern European band. I'd say you could PROD it and see what happens. An AfD would be a bit of a fight but still leaning towards deletion. ]] 11:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::prodded. It'll likely get rm'd without any actual repair being done to the heap. Time will tell. ] 11:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Not my caps - I merely quoted the instructions already on the page, a mere few words from where that edit was made (see ). --] 00:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==NSW== | |||
| I'll let you make that call. It doesn't matter what you do anyway; I'll be blamed for it. Edgar Bergen over there can't tell us apart! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 09:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry for eavesdropping Scarian but I just wanted to say the above comment is one of the funniest things I've read on here in the last few days :D . Which one's Charlie? ] 10:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I know what you mean! I found it very funny too :-D haha ]] 10:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thought of the day Scarian== | |||
| Ever notice(I believe I may have actually pointed this out to you before)... that the Misplaced Pages Metal Project is over-populated with d*nks. :D . After 400000+ edits you would think that I wouldn't get miffed by the idiots that try to edit here. But... there are the odd few who should get the banhammer. There... vented.... now back to ''"turn up the good and turn down the suck"'' :D . ] 23:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I think I may have stumbled across a sockpuppet for 'uber-troll' ]. Take a look at the contributions of and compare. It's like when one doesn't get his own way the other makes the same edit. Ever do a RCU before? ] 23:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, I'm not a puppet. And I don't care how many edits ] has, he/ she was making unneccesary edits in abundance. As much I enjoy the title "idiot" and "d*nk" (w/e that is) it doesn't change the facts that this user's edits were supercillious. No consensus has been reached on the comma break vs. the line break issue, and I happen to think the line break looks cleaner. Not to mention, almost '''all''' metal band pages use the format of the line break between genres in the music infobox, unless you count nu metal, metalcore, or any -core bands. And let's face it ''real'' metal fans don't care about nu metal or any -core genres as they reek.] 23:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::]??? anyone. "Real metal fans"... It's always disappointing when someone edits this project based on their own personal opinions and not for what the project was designed for. When you come to Misplaced Pages... check your opinions at the door... thay have no place here... right Scarian. I, myself, hate Barney... despise him. I hate The Wiggles too. And I hate ABBA... ooo I hate ABBA!!!!. But... despite my personal feeling towwards these subjects... I have probably reverted over a thousand vandalism edits to these pages. Our personal ] editor has a lot to learn about what Misplaced Pages is all about. All newbie editors should be forced to go to ] and learn every sub-page that stems from there. He vertainly doesn't know what ] is :D. I should dare hime to try and stick a flagicon on the Motorhead page :D . He would see the lightning rv and our good admin friend who owns that page :D . I've mentored many an editor on here. And I've pitchforked many an editor back under the bridge from whence they came :D . I am undecided as to what fate awaits a few newbs I've crossed in the last few days. Time will tell :D . ''Where's that confounded bridge!'' ] 23:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would love to learn how to do an RCU :-D I told the user that he should take up his concerns with you rather than bung all the shit on my talk page . I'll have a quick look through the contribs of both users and if it's suspicious will you point out what to do next? ]] 23:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Haha - saw what happened at the incident board. '''Nice!!''' haha - that made me laugh so much. So utterly futile. ]] 00:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Upon further review I am leaning towards the idea that they are different editors who just haven't figured out the difference between an encyclopedia and a junior high book report. Scipo is definitely an "ignore the rules" editor who is here for his own purpose whilst the other gentleman has some tact and some "encyclopedic focus" to his contributions. I had to laugh at the "real metal fans" comment though. I've been a fan of heavy metal music(among many others) for almost 40 years... basically as long as there's been a heavy metal genre to be a fan of. When I think of the stereotyped "real metal fans" a mental picture of a snotty nosed, greasy haired, "shop class dropout" pops up. "Real metal fans" are the one's who read metal-archives.com without realising that it caters only to inbred idiots. I am sure Mr Navlos is not really one of those "level 4" stereotypes. He will, in the end, reveal himself to be a very benificial editor to the project as time goes by. Mr Scipo, on the other hand, seem to only be here for a single purpose. Time will tell. ] 00:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Alright - your call. I was just warming myself up by reading ] - the users did seem vaguely familiar though in their summaries, in my opinion that is. I'm here till late if you need me for anything, friend. Take good care of yourself. ]] 00:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :BTW, I see you've been accused of sockery yourself. Very nice! If you're going to be accused of being "meat" it's always nice when the other editor is noble... And Butseriouslyfolks is certainly that. I have always had respect for his editing. If you're goinf to be lumped in with anyone... he is certainly a decent one to get "put into the drawer" with :D . AND...on top of all that... you userpage went under a barrage of vandal attacks. That's even better. Back when I was a logged in editor, my userpage was vandalised over 100 times :D . I've always told all dedicated editors of this project... if your userpage get vandalised.... then you are definitely doing '''something right''' around here. Almost deserving of a barnstar for something like that I'd say. Not from my floater IP though. I will muster something up when I get back to my static IP. You've certainly been working hard and have earned one... if I do say-so myself... and I do. :) Have a nice day. ] 00:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Haha - that was, I think, the second or third time I've been called a "]" on Misplaced Pages. Lovely stuff! You always seem to drop me in it Libsey :-D ] - Remember that hunk of junk ? I put it up for AfD and BSF and I get accused of being one and the same :-D All thanks to you! Hehe. Oh, well I thank yee very much in advance for the barnstar! Take care, bud. ]] 00:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==re: Iron Maiden == | |||
| It was lost in . I should have caught it long before this but I was still in NZ and suffering a bit of jet lag. Ahhh... but it's repaired now. Along with Saxon, Motorhead and Def Leppard(!), Iron Maiden are one of the key NWOBHM bands.... shame not to have that in the box. The talk page discussion supports the inclusion of it and heavy metal.. ONLY. Any other genres can be turfed(like progressive metal) because it was not part of the concensus. ] 01:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Roger you got it. I should've paid more attention. Damn me. Cheers! ]] 01:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Flirtin' away!== | |||
| Scarian! How great to hear from my favorite ]! How are things 'cross the pond? And, yup, I'm just a big flirt..heh... I've been having fun, lotsa great folks on the 'pedia! Mostly been fighting vandals and socks...some speedies... It's great! Drop by anytime, my friend! ] <small>]</small> 01:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sox== | |||
| I was thinking the same. (He's confusing me with a good editor? Cool!) I have dibs on the right sock, though. You'll have to play Mr. ]. --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 01:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==School== | |||
| Thanks. I should have looked closer and got it all on the second go. ] ] 01:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Names== | |||
| Saw it after-the-fact. I sense a wave of "I.P. Freely" type names are going to be set up...all from the same editor. Unencyclopediots! There always lurking about. ] 01:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ahhh, my old friend VandalProof. I always loved using that tool. Have they fixed the bug yet that places the warning on the talk page of the editor previous to the actual vandal? Bad glitch there. ] 02:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::RPP is listed. ] 02:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Rambo (video game)|, such as the one you made to ],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: <span class="plainlinks"></span>. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 203--> ] 02:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hahahaha - Thank you. You've made my night. ]] 02:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::VP doesn't always do it...just occasionally. It does it with the recent changes feed, also. Sorry for the hassle, but glad to entertain. Cheers. ] 03:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Dropped by my office (and static IP) for just 1 edit today... == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Resilient Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks! ]]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 21:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You show nothing but positive growth and good humour from all your Wiki-experiences... whether they be good or bad. You will be nominated to be an admin someday. And I would resurrect my long discarded account just to be able to '''support''' your nom. Have a nice day! ''':D''' ] 01:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC) "Libs" | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| == Hey! == | |||
| Lookin' for an easy AfD? Check out this piece of ]. All the refs are links to other Wiki pages. The article creator is one of those "Level 4's" we've discussed before. It's an easy pick. ] 03:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Done and tagged! :-D ]] 12:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::'''PS''' Check out ] :D . ] must've been let out early :D . Looking for some easy... '''EASY''' AfD fodder. Check out the edit history of the young "core" squire in the other half of the convo :D . Sometimes... they're just too easy. ] 03:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ha - that seemed just like one of those convo's we have when we're kids. "You're an idiot!" "No, you're an idiot!" I'll have a lookey! ]] 12:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::'''PPS''' Need a template? Here's how the system ]. The original AfD'er on that list was a user named Chubbles. I alerted him as to the repost of his AfD and its Speedy D tag. And to the possibility of starting a "sweeping list-fluff" wave of Wiki-cleanliness. Perhaps a new dawn of "listcruft-free" Wikidom is on the horizon. One could only hope. ] 03:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::To quote Darth Vader... ] :D . Sorry for the ranting... too many coffee and not enough long walks on the trail with the dogs. :D . ] 03:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == New Way Home == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> | |||
| == Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity == | |||
| Hello! There is currently a ] of a bot to manage the ] ] by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the ]. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be ''uncontroversially'' removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, dude. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:MusikAnimal@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:MusikBot_II/Inactive_MMS_targets&oldid=748573976 --> | |||
| I noticed that you deleted this page because they are a band without much significance, but so what? Misplaced Pages should not distinguish between popular and unpopular bands, but rather should host information about any that users want to write about. | |||
| And besides, if you went through wikipedia deleting all of the pages about bands you think are not significant, that would remove half of Misplaced Pages's content... | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| ...all right, perhaps a slight exaggeration. ] 09:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Scarian. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :Misplaced Pages does distinguish between ] bands though... | |||
| :"...but rather should host information about any that users want to write about..." - You're taking up challenging Misplaced Pages's core policy with ''me''? Go to the ] if you want to challenge what Misplaced Pages is about. I'm afraid I can't help you with that one. ]] 11:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thank you for the new 'shiny'. It's much appreciated. ] 12:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Alright== | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| First off, I apologize for writing on your talk page, I just did not know how else to talk to that user as he/ she was working without an account. I do appreciate that that user said some nice things above, though. I ''DO'' want to help wikipedia and I realize that I should leave opinions out of articles and trust me I understand that. That is why I avoid editing pages about subjects I do not like. I ''still'' believe the line break is better than the comma break and since no consensus has been arranged, I will continue to use the line break. Also =) I have used metal-archives on the rare occasion as it does have some useful information, and although I do not think the site is full of inbred idiots, I also see no reason to spend time on that site except to rarely look something up as they do have abundant information about discographies and the such.] 18:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=866998363 --> | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| ==Signshare== | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| From here on out let me handle the Ja Rule page what are you a fag or something? beef is always used in hip hop termanology to describe a feud and you replace it with row and argument? you probably don't listen to rap at all and that makes it sound gay so stay in your place and watch what you say I am putting beef back in and you better not remove it. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->. If you like chess, why are you editing a page about rap music, it is not incorrect grammar, it is slang which is popular in hip hop it is not college English, BEEF IN HIP HOP means a feud a disagreement between two or more crews (set of people) you idiot, but I still wish the best for you and hope that you pass English, and indeed you should and I wish you the best in life. Signshare October 29, 2007. | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| --] (]) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:02, 30 October 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Scarian has not edited Misplaced Pages since 17 March 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm back
But in a reduced capacity. I don't really have a role anymore and I definitely won't be making a conscious effort to involve myself deeper with Misplaced Pages. I've moved on in my life but I still have a fondness for Misplaced Pages and some of its users. Scarian 21:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome back! Enigma 04:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back loser :P Danger^Mouse (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ta to you both! Scarian 20:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back to one the greatest!
Wiki is still overpopulated with completely useless whiners (like every single editor who ever complained about you :-D ) Stick around for a while....the Wik needs you and more like you. Frozen in solid on the East Coast all Winter is giving me the blues. And now I read that Gary Moore has died. So I will be in Moore blues for a while to come. No UK trips in my future. Maybe someday. Wiki libs (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ha, you're too kind to me, my old friend. MK one day, promise? Scarian 20:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Foo Fighters
Thought I would discuss this first rather than just revert, because really, it's not a big issue. I agree with the hidden note that because of the amount of bands the members have been a member of/contributed to, it should be limited. At the same time though, surely Them Crooked Vultures and Taylor Hawkins and the Coattail Riders are directly related, even with only one member in common? Both were formed while Foos were active and feature current members. The Coattail Riders have released 2 albums, while TCV plan on releasing a second. , , ,
Also, I couldn't find anything about the note on the talk page (archives included). I'm assuming it was added due to editors constantly adding groups like Queens of the Stone Age, Scream, etc? I don't think the note should apply to the aforementioned band's, though that's just my opinion. What do you think? :) HrZ (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think an old user added it years ago, I can't even remember. Chris-something... He used to be really active on the Nirvana band page. Um... I would recommend bringing this to the talk page for a wider consensus. To be honest, I've just been trying to stick to the note, although if you think a differently worded one would make more sense, feel free to suggest. Cheers for your message, bro. Scarian 09:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah ok, was going to do that, but thought I would ask yourselfm incase I missed anything on the talk page about the note. Thanks for the reply! HrZ (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back
I'm so behind... Welcome back! Have a cookie. Rory 08:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Rory! Scarian 23:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
User Fasttimes68 is still causing problems with the article on Stephanie Adams
If you visit the Stephanie Adams discussion page, you will see people asking him to stop, but he still insists upon causing trouble.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_1992
Here are a few additional links as well:
He and user Hoary were the two who caused problem with that article for over five years, which is why it is currently being redirected, yet it's still an issue to them, even with only one sentence in the article. Major conflict of interest going on... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.68.72 (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| Thanks! OmegaBuddyfind me here 21:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC) |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Scarian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Categories: