Misplaced Pages

User talk:Gscshoyru: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:02, 3 November 2007 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Gscshoyru/Archive 2.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:44, 27 October 2023 edit undoGscshoyru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,512 edits I still exist I just don't do anything but I'll still respond to stuff.Tag: Manual revert 
(646 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 2 |counter = 3
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Gscshoyru/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Gscshoyru/Archive %(counter)d
Line 20: Line 20:
</div><!-- Template:smile --> </div><!-- Template:smile -->


== Thanks! ==
== I did not remove material from talk page ==


{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|lightblue}}};"
I did not remove material from talk page that was "Beltran" and now I have to restore it. El Jigue] 19:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]

|rowspan="2" |
:Yes, you did. See diff. ] 19:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''My RFA'''

Amazing you are accusing me of removing the material that I inserted. That is not logical. El Jigue] 20:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

:Perhaps you're confused as to what I mean -- you removed his ''comments'' from the ''talk page.'' That's what I was warning you about. I'm not talking about the actual article at all. ] 20:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

== ] removal of signature ==

In case you are curious, the script removal was due to ] trying to keep people from knowing he edits at ] (although him being autoblocked there makes it sort of obvious). It's going to be quite difficult to argue that they aren't the same person now. -- ] (]) 19:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

== Sorry ==

I'm sorry.] 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

For the revert. :) ] 02:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

== Francis Drake ==

I must respectfully disagree with your removal of my paragraph on the vast hoax surrounding Drake's will. I caefully cross-referenced this to the perpetrator, who has his own article in Misplaced Pages which discusses the matter in depth, and included another reference to an article discussing The New Yorker piece on this scam. Thus, it is clearly referenced two different ways. If these links are satisfactory please return it; it's an amazing example of public gullibility. ] 04:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

:Your original link did not seem to be a ], nor did you ] it properly. But if the New Yorker had a piece on it, that is a reliable source, so add it back using that source as a reference, and ] it properly. ] 11:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

== Get Conflict Issue ==

You have no right to remove the factually get conflict article
from my edit unprotected page. You suggested you placed it on another page. This is not your right to touch my talk page.
--] 17:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

:I didn't suggest I put it on another page. I did put it on another page. It should not be on your talk page, that's far too confusing to users who wish to communicate with you. Instead, it's on a subpage of your userspace, where you can do, within reason, whatever you want with it, which is what you intended, ok? ] 17:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

== That's it... ==

...it's gotten to the point where I can't do RC patrol anymore because of you and ]. You're also the reason ] is backlogged so often. There's only one way to remedy this... interested in running for admin? :D ]

:See ]. The reasoning I gave then still applies. Unfortunately, I still have yet to actually contribute to articles. I ''am'' interested in it, eventually. But I've only been active for four months, and I really should have some experience contributing to articles first. Plus, I have no experience with AFD's, which seems to be a necessary condition for adminship, as I have seen it others' RFA's. However, your message is quite gratifying. Seriously, you've made my day. I'm not the ''only'' person (besides DerHexer) that's keeping you from doing RC patrol, am I? ] 20:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
::I don't think an RfA for you would go badly. Lots of editors who exclusively fight vandals have had successful RfAs; the two that jump to mind are DerHexer and CSCWEM, although they both had around 12,000 edits at the time of their RfA. Hell, Clown's RfA received over 60 supports before he even accepted it. As for AfD, I don't do dick there and my RfA is running away with supports. However, if you want to build some articles first, that's your choice and I can't argue with you. As for the other thing, this is what I see whenever I try to do RC patrol:
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align:justify;border:0px;margin-top:0.2em;"
|-
! style="text-align:center" |'''Expand me!'''
|-
| style="border:solid 1px silver;padding:8px;font-weight:bold;color:red;background-color:#fff"|
*Latest revision is made by DerHexer, so it might already been reverted, stopping reverting.
*Latest revision is made by Gscshoyru, so it might already been reverted, stopping reverting.
*<span style="color:#090">Vandalism revert is chosen on ClueBot, as this is a whitelisted bot, we assume you wanted to revert vandalism made by the previous user instead.</span>
*current lag of 11 seconds is more than our defined maximum lag of 5 seconds, will retry in 5 seconds<span style="color:#000;font-weight:normal">...at which point I get beaten by someone using ].</span> <font size="2" style="font-weight:normal">]</font>
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for participating in ], which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. ]
|} |}


== Kindness ==
:::I see stuff like that often too, you know -- usually often off of DerHexer and Oxymoron83 and AngelOfSadness, and sometimes you. Maybe it has to do with ''when'' I do vandal patrol that we keep running into each other. It doesn't matter though -- AfD isn't important to me -- but contributing to articles is. This ''is'' an encyclopedia, the main point of which it to contribute to. I'm just an ancillary member, currently, I'll I've managed to do is keep the status quo, which isn't improving the encyclopedia. Eventually, say winter break, hopefully, I ''will'' get around to adding to a number of math, CS, and possibly science articles, since these ''are'' my passions, and what I know most about. Till then, though what I do is important, and my understanding of policies are pretty good, I need to do much of what the most important task in the encyclopedia ''is'' before running. After winter break, when I'm back at college, I may be open to a nom, if I've done what I say I'll do. But ask me first. (Also, me contributing to articles will leave you open to do some RC patrol!) ] 11:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
== re: ] ==
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]

On the Talk Page, I presented an argument for reinstatement. If you still believe that your reversions were the best course of action, then please provide support for that view.
:I've moved the above comment from your userpage. ] <sup>(], ]</sup> 19:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

Someone vandalized my Userspace! ] But a little angel came along and fixed it! ] Thank you! ] 00:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)<!-- {{vangel}} template -->

== Vandalized ==

What the hell are you talking about?!Apples99 16:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
: diff. ] is not a page to talk on, rather it's a page on talk page policy. Thus, your arguments on the page are vandalism. ] 16:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
*:It's called a MISTAKE. I had too many tabs open and I meant to edit a user's talk page Nishkid64 and accidentally edited that. If you read my recent edits you will see that. Why on earth would I vandalized the talk page when I'm trying to get my article reverted? Could you possibly be more reactionary and hostile? Just delete it and move on. Thanks. Even real cops aren't this bad!Apples99 16:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I'm actually inclined to agree on this one. You're one of our best vandal fighters, Gscshoyru, but maybe a little too quick on the trigger this time. ;) ]''']''' 16:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
:I agree. Please ] with editors. Thanks, and keep up the good work. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 16:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
::(ec)If it's a mistake you should have told me in the first place instead of, well, "cursing" at me, (yes hell is a curse) and I wouldn't have given you a level 3 warn if one hadn't already had one towards the bottom for personal attacks. I tend to look at the contribs ''after'' I warn, since twinkle takes me right to your talk page, and your recent edits combined with the personal attack warning made me mentally dump you into the "trolling because their non-notable article was deleted and their pissed about it" category, and your original message to me only corroborated my categorization of you. Admittedly, it's not assuming good faith -- which I admit is probably my greatest failing -- dealing with vandals makes me see vandals everywhere, which is a bad thing. But you could have done some of the same -- asking kindly if you didn't know what I was talking about, telling me that I was making a mistake, and why, and/or apologizing would have elicited a different response from me sooner. In any case, sorry for assuming you were someone you weren't, and sorry for giving you such a harsh warn. ] 16:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

== My turn now ==

Someone vandalized my Userspace! ] But a little angel came along and fixed it! ] Thank you! <small>You can thank others by using {{tls|Vangel}}!</small> ] 21:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)<!-- {{vangel}} template -->
] 21:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

*Er, ditto. Thanks for clearing up on my talk page. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 22:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

== Thank you! ==

The Zen Garden Award
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
|rowspan="2" | |rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all the help you've given me, I feel you deserve this ] (])
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This is for you as you already have many barnstars for stopping vandalsim. I noticed the Geography portal had gone and was panicing about how I was supposed to get it back and which version it should go back to. Next thing I knew, you and come along and fixed it which, of course calmed me down. While this award may not strictly have be given for infinate patience, it is for giving a newbie peace and I'm sure that's allowed. Thank you :) ] 02:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
|} |}


== ] ==
== Happy Halloween! ==


Hi,<br>
]
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 -->


== RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey ==
Hello, Gscshoyru! Happy Halloween! <span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,]]] (])'''''</span> 00:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

:Heh, BOO! Happy Halloween you you too! ] 00:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

== Serge Gainsbourg ==

Please read the Misplaced Pages guidelines carefully.

I'm afraid I have reported you for edit warring. In future, please use the talk page before editing. ] 03:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

:I ''have'' provided reasons -- see the talk. And please read up on policies yourself -- ip jumping to get around the ] is ], and accusing other editors of vandalism when it is unwarranted and a mere content dispute violates ] and ]. Finally, read ] -- you made a change, were reverted, so you discuss without reverting again, until consensus is reached. You no not keep reverting if multiple editors oppose you. ] 03:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

== thanks ==

Hello, thanks for fixing my edit to ]. --]] 04:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

:No problem :) ] 04:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
== Preity Zinta FA ==

Hi there. The ] article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at ]. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable.]</span> <sup>]</sup> 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

I reverted him twice. To block him myself would risk being improper. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 18:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

:I suppose, that does in fact make sense. Otherwise admins could impose their power on content disputes because they believe they're right, which could lead to problems -- better to be safe than sorry. But even with as blatant as a rule-breaking as this one, though? ] 18:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

::It is best to err on the side of caution and have another admin look over the situation. Admins shouldn't use the tools if they have been personally involved in the situation. While I really wasn't (the IP filed a false vandal report against the person who reverted him. While following up on it I found he was blatantly pushing his edit through using multiple IPs) it would still risk looking/being improper. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 18:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

:::Yeah, point taken. It's just that I have found 3RR reporting to be a bit slow, and you have to sit with the bad edit on the page waiting for an admin to finally look at the noticeboard, as there aren't many who "patrol" it. But your 3RR was malformed, so theoretically it should have been refused, so be more careful. I wonder if AzaToth can add an interactive tool to twinkle that'll let you make half-automated reports... hm. ] 18:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

::::3RR is indeed slow these days. Honestly, I should go over there more often to assist. I didn't provide diffs for multiple reversions, true, but I figured a glance at the contributions would show that is the only article the IPs had edited and the edit summary's show they are simply reverts. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 19:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

== Barnstar! ==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all your anti-vandlism work. <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">]</span> 19:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
|}


]
:What brought this about? Thanks!! ] 19:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
<big>'''''Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!'''''</big>
:: You beat me to the punch a few times, and I have seen you about. :) <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">]</span> 19:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Well thank you then :) ] 19:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


This is a '''one-time-only''' message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the ''']''' that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
== Cheers ==


# ]
</noinclude><div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]


Further, there are ] that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
{{{1|]]}}} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! {{{2|}}} <br />


Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
</div><!-- Template:Cookie --><noinclude>Cheers for the talkpage revert. :D ]] 23:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


<small>Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{tl|User wikipedia/RC Patrol|}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.</small>
== Thanks ==


Best regards, {{u|Stevietheman}} — <small>Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
For that revert. :) ] 03:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
<!--Sent per Special:PermaLink/753582870#Request_for_mass_message_delivery:_December_6.2C_2016 at WT:MMS-->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Stevietheman/RCPatrollers_list&oldid=753533319 -->

Latest revision as of 21:44, 27 October 2023

Welcome

Hello Gscshoyru and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

AngelOfSadness talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks!

My RFA
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:21, 11/4/2007

Kindness

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For all the help you've given me, I feel you deserve this User:David A (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)