Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Fovean chronicles: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:25, 6 November 2007 editFovean Author (talk | contribs)230 edits →Fovean chronicles← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:37, 1 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''<span style="color:red;">d</span>elete'''. - ] 04:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}


:{{la|Fovean chronicles}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Fovean chronicles}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 10: Line 17:
:*'''Comment''' ] has a rather obvious ] here, and anyways none the links he brings up are sufficient to establish his book's notability according to WP's standards. ] ] 22:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC) :*'''Comment''' ] has a rather obvious ] here, and anyways none the links he brings up are sufficient to establish his book's notability according to WP's standards. ] ] 22:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Abstain'''. Apparently the website with the 11,000 fans of the first book is no longer up for us to see; I wish it were. In the old days the distinction between a real publisher and a vanity press was easy to make; Internet self-publishing blurs this, and such self-published works cannot always be readily rejected from WP consideration. However, it certainly doesn't help that the author wrote this article, nor does it help that the author's editing practices on WP political articles are quite misguided. ] 03:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC) *'''Abstain'''. Apparently the website with the 11,000 fans of the first book is no longer up for us to see; I wish it were. In the old days the distinction between a real publisher and a vanity press was easy to make; Internet self-publishing blurs this, and such self-published works cannot always be readily rejected from WP consideration. However, it certainly doesn't help that the author wrote this article, nor does it help that the author's editing practices on WP political articles are quite misguided. ] 03:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' the website is still up: <ref http://www.intwiz.com>Web Site</ref>. If you don't like my assessment, you can read the books yourself from there and do your own review. :*'''Comment''' the website is still up: <ref> http://www.intwiz.com>Web Site</ref>. If you don't like my assessment, you can read the books yourself from there and do your own review. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Delete''' per others. ] 17:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per others. ] 17:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 11:37, 1 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fovean chronicles

Fovean chronicles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:BK and WP:WEB. I have searched for independant reviews and found none. The article appears to have been created by the books' author, and reads like an ad. Yilloslime (t) 16:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Abstain. Apparently the website with the 11,000 fans of the first book is no longer up for us to see; I wish it were. In the old days the distinction between a real publisher and a vanity press was easy to make; Internet self-publishing blurs this, and such self-published works cannot always be readily rejected from WP consideration. However, it certainly doesn't help that the author wrote this article, nor does it help that the author's editing practices on WP political articles are quite misguided. Wasted Time R 03:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. http://www.intwiz.com>Web Site