| Revision as of 07:33, 11 November 2007 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,803 edits →Arbitration: Yes, I think you should get credit for that. Nonetheless, do you really not see a problem with punitive blocks?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,059 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jehochman/Archives 25. (BOT) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image | |||
| <div class="usermessage"><div class="plainlinks" align="center">Leave a '''. Extra credit for politeness.'''</div></div> | |||
| |image = File:Naturhistorisk Privatundervisning.jpg | |||
| |size = 500px | |||
| |align = center | |||
| |alt = Placeholder alt text | |||
| |fullwidth = yes | |||
| |capcenter = yes | |||
| |caption = <br/>{{big|{{big|"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"}}}}{{small|]}} | |||
| }} | |||
| <!--my archives are messed up so I have removed the links. They might be fixed some day--> | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Jehochman/Archives | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| |age=168 | |||
| |minkeepthreads=1 | |||
| |maxarchsize=350000 | |||
| |numberstart=25 | |||
| |header={{aan}} | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki> | |||
| }} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! align="center" | ]<br />] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| <br/> | |||
| This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. | |||
| <!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Jehochman/Archive 4--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ==We need your help BADLY== | |||
| Hi, it's me from the Toto page from a month ago. On the page for the "Barenaked Ladies", there's one poster who won't stop using sources that are not reliable. He's using only 2 sources for the entire page and they are from 2 alleged tv specials even though there's no evidence that these tv specials actually aired. Please help, can you look over the page and talk to the poster TheHYPO. I've told him he needs more sources and better sources. He's just ignoring me, he has a bad attitude. You were such a great help last time with the Toto page, I trust you 100% with these situations. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ] ] 12:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| : I'm heading out the door. Please take this to ] for quick action. - ] <sup>]</sup> 12:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Goodness, Gracious! == | |||
| I certainly hope that your faith in Lin Shukun does not turn out to be misplaced.] 21:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : If it is, there is no harm done in being nice. You see how I was nice to Sadi Carnot twice before. Watch how the case resolves. - ] <sup>]</sup> 22:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sri Lanka related== | |||
| See and | |||
| . Is this acceptable ? Thanks ] 18:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I've issued a warning. Hopefully the editor will adjust. - ] <sup>]</sup> 19:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks we are progressing towards total peace and quiet for a change in these articles. Thanks again] <small>—Preceding ] was added at 15:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Establishing Notability/COI issues for article == | |||
| Hello; I'm trying to clean up COI issues and establish notability for ]. I left a note on the discussion page citing a source about 10 days ago, but I'm not sure how to proceed next, as there's been no response. Thanks very much for any tips. ] 19:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : You could post a notice at ] and ask for help. That should work. - ] <sup>]</sup> 19:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Thank you; I will do that. ] 19:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image copyright violation? == | |||
| Good morning Jehochman - I hope I can ask a favor of you. I came across today, and it seems to me to be a violation of copyright, or at least, a misrepresentation of who the owner of the copyright actually is. It's virtually the same as well-established image, just with a bit of color and the Chinese characters edited out. I have to confess that I'm not very familiar with the procedures for questioning the copyright of an image, and my brief search for answers didn't yield much fruit. Would you mind having a look, and take whatever action you think necessary? And, if you'd be so kind, could you point me in the right direction of the proper procedures for this sort of thing, so I don't have to bug you in the future? Many thanks <sub><span style="border:1px solid #330088;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 14:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : This is what I did, and you can do the same: <pre>{{copyvio|http://www.nndb.com/people/974/000086716/cks-sm.jpg}}</pre> Best regards, - ] <sup>]</sup> 14:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Outstanding - I'll tuck that under my hat. Cheers <sub><span style="border:1px solid #330088;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 14:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Technical point == | |||
| We need to renumber the Proposed findings of Fact, because there are two number 14s. Could you protect the workshop page for a couple of minutes and do this before the problem gets any greater? Thanks in advance. ] ] 14:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I have to run to a meeting. The clerks will take care of this, or you can do it yourself if you like. In spite of the robust debate, I would still like to be your friend, and am happy to settle this case by a mutual statement of principles if you like, and I am willing to strike any negative comments I've made if you would do the same. - ] <sup>]</sup> 14:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Re : LOL! thanks for taking care of this. ] ] 16:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: You're welcome. - ] <sup>]</sup> 16:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Another violation in SL realted articles== | |||
| Violation of 1RR ,, and violation of ] calls in the edit summary ] 15:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Continuing discussions== | |||
| You may not be aware of further discussions ] and ]. As one of the administrators involved in the case and/or in its discussions, I think it would be useful if you could comment. Thank you in advance, ] 17:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I'm only involved a little bit, and there seems to be a crowd already. - ] <sup>]</sup> 16:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your last edits == | |||
| You wiped mine and Durova's comments under "Phsychim62 refused to abide by the consensus". You wiped yours, too. I restored mine and Durova's, but if yours was an accident, you might want to put it back as well.] 23:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks.- ] <sup>]</sup> 16:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi! == | |||
| Hello Jehochman, how are you? I leave this message because of your "faith in the system", and because I have recently opened a ]. I share your faith in the wikiprocess and value your opinions. Peace and good days! ] <sup>]</sup> 03:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hey Jehochman. First, I would like to thank you for your help with the Sri Lankan issues. Your work is much appreciated. Can you also comment on the following issue please. Thanks ] 07:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nipping SixString in the bud == | |||
| Thanks for catching MindGuerilla. As you can probably tell, I don't have a lot of experience with sock-puppets, and what instilled my zero-tolerance attitude was good ol' SixString there. You didn't happen to catch the IP there, did you? Again, I appreciate you acting quickly. - ] ] 07:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC ] == | |||
| {{ExampleRFCxxx|Talk: Wheel war}} ]/]/] 09:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''extra note - look at the signature, did you use 4 tildes or 5?'' ]/]/] 09:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| <div style="padding: 5px; background: #FFDCF8; border-style: solid; border-width: 10px; border-color: #000000; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 100%; "> | |||
| <center> | |||
| <div style="margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 9px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 200px; float: center;">]</div> | |||
| </center> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;"> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;"> | |||
| <div class="NavHead" style="background: white; text-align: center;"><small>Click there to open your card!</small> → → →</div> | |||
| <div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: center;"> | |||
| Dearest {{BASEPAGENAME}},<br> | |||
| Thank you for your participation in ], which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your support is very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to ] and ] for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.<br> | |||
| <center>''']''']''']''' 20:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)<center> | |||
| '''Credits:''' <small>This RFA thanks was inspired by ''']'s RFA thanks''' which was inspired by ]'s RFA thanks.</small></div></div></div></div> | |||
| == TyrusThomas4lyf == | |||
| Any chance you could reinstate the block regarding ]? The sock-puppet activity has resumed unabated. Thanks. ] 23:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Arbitration== | |||
| Hi. Regretfully, I'm no longer confident in your judgment as a sysop. Both myself and Dmcdevit have repeatedly requested for your to provide us with a concrete grounds for the block (diffs of recent misconduct). Will you be willing to, as a last resort, do so? Or is a formal investigation by the arbitration committee the only recourse to compel you? Please let me know. Thanks in advance. ] 07:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I'd be happy to talk with you about this. You can IM me right now. Send email for an invite. - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry, I would prefer a public conversation. Is that possible? ] 07:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Sure. What do you need to know? Let me ask one first. I agreed to the unblock which was what you wanted. Don't you feel like I should get some credit for being agreeable? - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, I think you should get credit for that. Nonetheless, do you really not see a problem with punitive blocks? Throughout the day, I have asked you to submit anything concrete, immediate, recent, abusive, etc. as grounds for the block, but I felt that instead, you have been markedly evasive. You continued to link to subpages, which may or may not contianed said evidence rather than straightforwardly produce the evidence itself. It was not, in fact, until Dmcdevit "sanity" exasperation that you ceased from this subpage linking and move to bring something more direct, which nonetheless was not up to par. Now with your desired measures against Dreamguy rejected in the clarification request, you still challenge that my account is factually incorrect? I am already shaken by how offensive your conduct has been thus far (unlike Dmcdevit, who only found it "a bit offensive," I found it rather outrageous)). I would think that you would wish to enjoy from the benefit of out experience, which I do not wish to flaunt, but we each have blocked thousands of users throughout the course of years without much incidence. ] 07:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024
"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"Source
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)