Misplaced Pages

Afrocentrism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:53, 17 November 2007 view sourceTitanium Dragon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,004 edits Contemporary: Removed undue weight/badly worded paragraph that doesn't say anything useful; we aren't a soapbox.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:25, 22 December 2024 view source GreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,810 edits Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|African ethnocentrism}}
]
{{totallydisputed}} {{pp|small=yes}}
{{refimprove}} {{pp-semi-indef}}
{{for-multi|the study of African culture and history|African studies|the academic theory|Afrocentricity|the book|Afrocentricity (book)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{{Pan-African}} {{Pan-African}}
{{Black Power sidebar}}
:''see ] for the study of African culture and history in Africa.''
'''Afrocentrism''' is a worldview that is centered on the history of people of African descent or a view that favors it over non-African civilizations.<ref>"Recent" here means in the last few thousand years, as opposed to in the ], for example ]</ref> It is in some respects a response to ] attitudes about ] and their historical contributions. It seeks to counter what it sees as mistakes and ideas perpetuated by the racist philosophical underpinnings of Western academic disciplines as they developed during and since Europe's ] as justifying rationales for the enslavement of other peoples, in order to enable more accurate accounts of not only African but all people's contributions to world history.<ref>CC Verharen, "Molefi Asante...”, The Western Journal of Black Studies, (24)4, 2000, pp. 223–238</ref> Afrocentricity deals primarily with ] and African agency and is a ] point of view for the study of culture, ], and history.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123082650/http://www.asante.net/articles/1/afrocentricity/ |date=23 November 2018 }}.</ref><ref name="Africana">], and ] (eds), '']'' Volume 1, p. 111, Oxford University Press. 2005. {{ISBN|0-19-517055-5}}</ref>
'''Afrocentricity''', or '''Afrocentrism''', is a sometimes controversial approach to the study of history that stresses the distinctive identity and contributions of ] cultures to world history. Afrocentrists commonly contend that ] has led to the neglect or denial of the contributions of ] and focused instead on a ''generally'' ]an-centered model of world civilization and history. Therefore, Afrocentricity is a paradigmatic shift from a European-centered history to an African-centered history. More broadly, Afrocentricity is concerned with distinguishing the influence of ] peoples from African achievements.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |title="Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English" |accessdate=2007-11-13 |last=Moses |first=Greg |publisher=National Association for African American Studies }}</ref> The ideas of some Afrocentrists have been called ] by Western mainstream scholars, especially claims regarding ].<ref> {{cite web|url=http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html |title=Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism |accessdate=2007-11-13 |last=Sherwin |first=Elisabeth |publisher=Davis Community Network }}</ref> Contemporary Afrocentrists may view the movement as ] rather than ].<ref name=Olaniyan2006>{{cite journal

| author = Olaniyan, T.
Afrocentrism is a scholarly movement that seeks to conduct research and education on global history subjects, from the perspective of historical African peoples and polities. It takes a critical stance on Eurocentric assumptions and myths about world history, in order to pursue methodological studies of the latter. Some of the critics of the movement believe that it often denies or minimizes European, ]ern, and ] cultural influences while exaggerating certain aspects of historical African civilizations that independently accomplished a significant level of cultural and technological development. In general, Afrocentrism is usually manifested in a focus on the history of Africa and its role in contemporary African-American culture among others.
| year = 2006

| title = From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History Of An African And African American Discursivepractice)
What is today broadly called Afrocentrism evolved out of the work of African American intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but flowered into its modern form due to the activism of African American intellectuals in the U.S. ] and in the development of ] programs in universities. However, following the development of universities in African colonies in the 1950s, African scholars became major contributors to African historiography.<ref>General History of Africa, Vol 1, p41, UNESCO, 1981</ref> A notable pioneer is the professor ], who became chairman of the Committee on African Studies at Harvard in the 1970s.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/13/obituaries/kenneth-o-dike-dies-in-a-nigerian-hospital.html|title=Kenneth O. Dike Dies in a Nigerian Hospital|date=13 November 1983|newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref> In strict terms Afrocentrism, as a distinct historiography, reached its peak in the 1980s and 1990s.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Today{{when|date=December 2017}} it is primarily associated with ], ], ] and ]. Asante, however, describes his theories as ].<ref>Molefi Asante, ''The Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics'', foreword by ]: "Molefi Asante, the founding and preeminent theorist of Afrocentricity, is one of the most important intellectuals at work today. This work continues his tradition of combining an extraordinary intellectual range with an impressive ability to identify and clarify central issues in the current discourse on Afrocentricity, multiculturalism, race, culture, ethnicity and related themes. Dr. Asante offers an insightful and valuable response to Eurocentric critics of the Afrocentric initiative while simultaneously addressing a wide range of issues critical to understanding this important intellectual enterprise, including African agency, location, orientation, centerdness, subject-place and cultural groundedness. The volume is thoughtful, multifaceted and rewarding, and yields a rich sense of the contours and complexity of the Afrocentric project." --Dr. Maulana Karenga, Chair, Department of Black Studies, California State University, Long Beach."</ref>
| journal = West Africa Review

| issn = 1525-4488
Proponents of Afrocentrism support the claim that the contributions of various Black African people have been downplayed or discredited as part of the legacy of ] and slavery's ] of "writing Africans out of history".<ref>{{Cite journal |url=https://www.jstor.org/pss/3819303 |jstor=3819303 |last1=Andrade |first1=Susan Z. |title=Rewriting History, Motherhood, and Rebellion: Naming an African Women's Literary Tradition |journal=Research in African Literatures |date=1990 |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=91–110 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Woodson|first=Carter Godwin|author-link=Carter G. Woodson|title=The Mis-education of the Negro|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zF6J8Zge4XgC&pg=PA7|year=1933|publisher=ReadaClassic.com|page=7|id=GGKEY:LYULWKX4YJQ}}</ref>
}}</ref>

Major critics of Afrocentrism include ], who dismiss it as ],<ref>{{cite book|last=Howe|first=Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentrism00step|url-access=registration|year=1998|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-85984-228-7|page=}}</ref> reactive,<ref>{{cite book|last=Bracey|first=Earnest N.|title=Prophetic Insight: The Higher Education and Pedagogy of African Americans|url=https://archive.org/details/propheticinsight0000brac|url-access=registration|date=1 January 1999|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-7618-1384-2|page=}}</ref> and obstinately therapeutic.<ref name="autogenerated192">{{cite book|last=Marable|first=Manning|author-link=Manning Marable|title=Beyond Black and White: Transforming African-American Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/beyondblackwhite00mara|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-85984-924-8|page=}}</ref> Others, such as ], believe that Afrocentrism defeats its purpose of dismantling unipolar studies of world history by seeking to replace Eurocentricity with an equally ethnocentric and hierarchical curriculum, and negatively essentializes European culture and people of European descent. ] claims it to be "Eurocentrism in ]".<ref name="Banner-haley2003"/>

==Terminology==
The term "Afrocentrism" dates to 1962.<ref>{{cite book|last=Moses|first=Wilson Jeremiah|title=Afrotopia: The Roots of African American Popular History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hx0LGNxO_mAC&pg=PA44|date=13 September 1998|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-47941-7|pages=44–}}</ref> The adjective "Afrocentric" appears in a typescript proposal for an entry in '']'', possibly due to ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Elegant Inconsistencies: Race, Nation, and Writing in Wilson Jeremiah Moses's Afrotopia|last=Levine|first=Robert|doi=10.1093/alh/ajn016|year=2008|journal=American Literary History|volume=20|page=497|issue=3|s2cid=143005947}}</ref> The abstract noun "Afrocentricity" dates to the 1970s,<ref>{{cite book|author=Thairu, Kihumbu|title=The African Civilization|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yOk_AAAAYAAJ|year=1975|publisher=]}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=An Afrocentric Manifesto|publisher=Polity Press|year=2007|isbn=978-07456-4102-7|location=Cambridge, UK|pages=6}}</ref> and was popularized by ]'s ''Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change'' (1980). Molefi Kete Asante's theory, Afrocentricity, has been one developed in academic settings and may incorporate the terms Afrocentric to describe scholarship and Afrocentrists to describe scholars, but does not use Afrocentrism. According to Asante, though the two terms are often confused to mean the same, Afrocentrists are not adherents of Afrocentrism.<ref name=":0" /> This has caused confusing notions about who is considered an Afrocentrist, as various scholars who may or may not be associated with Asante and his works have been erroneously given the title, even by other academics.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=The Afrocentric Idea|publisher=Temple University Press|year=1998|isbn=1-56639-595-X|location=Philadelphia, PA|pages=ix-xiii}}</ref> Asante has written that Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism are not the same and neither do they share the same origin:

<blockquote>By way of distinction, Afrocentricity should not be confused with the variant Afrocentrism. The term “Afrocentrism” was first used by the opponents of Afrocentricity who in their zeal saw it as an obverse of Eurocentrism. The adjective “Afrocentric” in the academic literature always referred to “Afrocentricity.” However, the use of “Afrocentrism” reflected a negation of the idea of Afrocentricity as a positive and progressive paradigm. The aim was to assign religious signification to the idea of African centeredness. However, it has come to refer to a broad cultural movement of the late twentieth century that has a set of philosophical, political, and artistic ideas which provides the basis for the musical, sartorial, and aesthetic dimensions of the African personality. On the other hand, Afrocentricity, as I have previously defined it, is a theory of agency, that is, the idea that African people must be viewed and view themselves as agents rather than spectators to historical revolution and change. To this end Afrocentricity seeks to examine every aspect of the subject place of Africans in historical, literary, architectural, ethical, philosophical, economic, and political life.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=An Afrocentric Manifesto|publisher=Polity Press|year=2007|isbn=978-07456-4102-7|location=Cambridge, UK|pages=17}}</ref> </blockquote>


==History== ==History==
] journal ''The Crisis'' depicting an Afrocentric artist's interpretation of "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile"]] The origins of Afrocentricity can be found in the work of African and African-diaspora intellectuals in the late ] and early ]. Afrocentricity has changed over time, and has been hotly debated both outside and within Afrocentric circles. ] journal '']'' depicting "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile", a copy of the relief portraying ] on ].]]
Afrocentrism has its origins in the work of African and ] intellectuals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, following social changes in the United States and Africa due both to the end of ] and the decline of ]. Following the ], African Americans in the ] gathered together in communities to evade white control, established their own church congregations, and worked hard to gain education. They increasingly took more active public roles despite severe racial discrimination and segregation.<ref>Du Bois, W. E. B., ''Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880''. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935; reprint New York: The Free Press, 1998.</ref> American and African intellectuals looked to the African past for a re-evaluation of what its civilizations had achieved and what they meant for contemporary people.<ref>"". Accessed 19 November 2007. 2009-10-31.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |title=Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English |access-date=13 November 2007 |last=Moses |first=Greg |publisher=National Association for African American Studies |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212071725/http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |archive-date=12 December 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
{{Blockquote|The combination of the European centuries gives us about four to five hundred years of solid European domination of intellectual concepts and philosophical ideas. Africa and Asia were subsumed under various headings of the European hierarchy. If a war between the European powers occurred it was called a World War and the Asians and Africans found their way on the side of one European power or the other. There was this sense of assertiveness about European culture that advanced with Europe's trade, religious, and military forces.<ref>.</ref>|Molefi Asante|"De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths"}}


As an ideology and political movement, Afrocentrism had its beginnings in activism among black intellectuals, political figures, and historians in the context of the US American ].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Olaniyan, T.
===19th and early 20th century===
|year=2006
], an Americo-Liberian educator and diplomat active in the pan-Africa movement, acknowledged a change in perception taking place among Europeans towards Africans in his ] book ''African Life and Customs'', which originated as a series of articles in the ] ''Weekly News''.<ref name="alc">{{cite book | last = Blyden | first = Edward Wilmot | authorlink = Edward Wilmot Blyden | coauthors = | title = African Life and Customs | publisher = Black Classic Press | date = 1994-03-01 | isbn = 978-0933121430 }}</ref> In it, he put forth the notion that Africans were beginning to be seen as different and not inferior, in part because of the work of English writers such as ] and ].<ref name="alc">African Life and Customs, p. 7</ref> Such an enlightened view was fundamental to refuting prevailing ideas of Africa and Africans. Blyden used that standpoint to show how the traditional social, industrial, and economic life of Africans untouched by "either European or Asiatic influence", was simply different.<ref name="alc">African Life and Customs, p. 10</ref> In a letter responding to the original series of articles, Fante journalist and politician ] commented "It is easy to see the men and women who walked the banks of the ]" passing him on the streets of ].<ref name="alc">African Life and Customs, p. 78</ref> He further suggested the building of a University to preserve African identity and instincts. In that university, the history chair would teach
|title=From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History of an African And African American Discursivepractice)
<blockquote>"...universal history, with particular reference to the part ] has played in the affairs of the world. I would lay stress upon the fact that while ] was dedicating temples to "the God of gods, and secondly to his own glory", the ] had not yet appeared unto ] in the burning bush; that Africa was the cradle of the world's systems and philosophies, and the nursing mother of its religions. In short, that Africa has nothing to be ashamed of in its place among the nations of the earth. I would make it possible for this seat of learning to be the means of revising erroneous current ideas regarding the African; of raising him in self-respect; and of making him an efficient co-worker in the uplifting of man to nobler effort."<ref name="alc">African Life and Customs, p. 85</ref></blockquote>
|journal=West Africa Review
The exchange of ideas between Blyden and Hayford embodied the fundamental concepts of Afrocentricism.
|issn = 1525-4488}}
</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} According to U.S. professor Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, concepts of Afrocentricity lie at the core of disciplines such as ].<ref>Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, "The Place of Africalogy in the University Curriculum", ''Journal of Black Studies'', vol. 26 no. 6, July 1999, pp. 688–712.</ref> But ] claims that Afrocentrism roots are not exclusively African:
{{Blockquote|Despite the fulminations of ethno-chauvinists and other prejudiced persons, it remains a fact that the contributions of white scholars, like Boas, Malinowski, and Herskovits, were fundamental to that complex of ideas that we designate to days as Afrocentrism...Students of African and African American history have long appreciated the irony that much of what we now call Afrocentrism was developed during the 1930s by the Jewish American scholar ]{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}|Wilson J. Moses|''Historical Sketches of Afrocentrism''
}}


In 1987, ] published his '']'', in which he claims that ancient Greece was colonized by northern invaders mixing with a colony established by ] (modern Lebanon). A major theme of the work is the alleged denial by Western academia of the African and (western) Asiatic influence on ancient Greek culture.
Publications such as '']'' and ] sought to counter the prevailing view in the West that Sub-Saharan Africa had contributed nothing of value to human history that was not the result of incursions by Europeans and ]s.<ref>The African Origin of the Grecian Civilisation, ''Journal of Negro History'', 1917, pp.334-344</ref> These journals put forth a view of Ancient Egyptian civilization as the culmination of events arising from the origin of the human race in Africa. They investigated the history of Africa from that perspective.


==Aspects of Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism==
In his early years, editor of ''The Crisis'' ] researched ]n culture and attempted to construct a ] value system based on West African traditions. Du Bois later envisioned and received funding from ]ian president ] to produce an ''Encyclopedia Africana'' that would chronicle the history and cultures of Africa. He died before the work could be completed. Some aspects of Du Bois's approach are evident in the work of ], who identified a pan-African ] and presented evidence that ancient Egyptians were, indeed, Africans. Du Bois inspired a number of authors including ]. Upon reading his work ''The Negro'' (1915), she embarked upon writing her own ''Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire'' (1926). The book compiles evidence regarding the historic origins of ] and Ethiopia, including their influences on Greece.


===50s, 60s and 70s=== ===Afrocentricity book===
{{main|Afrocentricity (book)}}
], a follower of ] leader ], who emphasized the importance of Ethiopia as a great, "black civilization", was one of the first writers to argue that Black peoples should develop pride in African history. James's book, ''Stolen Legacy'' (1954) is often cited as one of the foundational texts of Afrocentricity. James claimed that ] was "stolen" from ancient Egyptian traditions and that these had developed from distinctively "African" cultural roots. For James, the works of ] and other Greek thinkers were, in fact, poor synopses of aspects of ancient Egyptian wisdom. According to James, the Greeks were a violent and quarrelsome people, unlike the Egyptians, and were not naturally capable of ]. James famously claimed in his book that Aristotle had physically "stolen" his ideas and works from an "African" Library of Alexandria, when, in fact, the ] was built by Greeks out of the collected scrolls of the Egyptian temples, during the Hellenistic period of Egypt, and well after Aristotle's death.


In 2000, African American Studies professor ], gave a lecture entitled "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium,"<ref>Kete Asante, Molefi, , University of Liverpool, 2 August 2000, accessed 11 February 2009 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090302025412/http://www.asante.net/articles/Liverpool-Address.html |date=2 March 2009 }}.</ref> in which he presented many of his ideas:
An important moment for Afrocentricity was the presentation of Senegalese scholar ], at the 1974 UNESCO symposium "The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Decipherment of Meroitic Script," <ref>The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Decipherment of Meroitic Script: Proceedings of the Symposium Held in Cairo from 28 January to 3 February 1974 by UNESCO, Review author: Bruce G. Trigger, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1980), pp. 371-373</ref> which attacked a long history of biased scholarship.
* Africa has been betrayed by international commerce, by ] and ], by the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world, by its own leaders, and by the ignorance of its own people of its past.
* ] originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.
* Afrocentricity constitutes a new way of examining data, and a novel orientation to data; it carries with it assumptions about the current state of the African world.
* His aim is "to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership."
* Afrocentricity can stand its ground among any ideology or religion: Marxism, ], ], ], or ]. Your Afrocentricity will emerge in the presence of these other ideologies because it is from you.
* Afrocentrism is the only ideology that can liberate African people.


Asante also stated:
===80s and 90s===
{{blockquote|As a cultural configuration, the Afrocentric idea is distinguished by five characteristics:
# an intense interest in psychological location as determined by symbols, motifs, rituals, and signs.
# a commitment to finding the subject-place of Africans in any social, political, economic, or religious phenomenon with implications for questions of sex, gender, and class.
# a defence of African cultural elements as historically valid in the context of art, music, and literature.
# a celebration of centeredness and agency and a commitment to lexical refinement that eliminates pejoratives about Africans or other people.
# a powerful imperative from historical sources to revise the collective text of African people.}}
However, Wilson J. Moses, said of Asante: "His second book, ''The Afrocentric Idea'' (1987), was a creative and in some respects brilliant but rambling theoretical work, much influenced by the revolution in "]" that occurred in American intellectual life during the late 1970s and early 1980s." Some also assert that the definition of Afrocentricity has never sat still long enough to be properly described and accurately critiqued.{{Citation needed|date=September 2015}}


===Afrocentric education===
In his (1992) article "Eurocentrism vs. Afrocentrism", American anthropologist Linus A. Hoskins wrote:
{{Main|Afrocentric education}}
<blockquote>
Afrocentric education is education designed to empower peoples of the African diaspora. A central premise behind it is that many Africans have been subjugated by limiting their awareness of themselves and indoctrinating them with ideas that work against them.<ref>Woodson, Dr. Carter G. (1933). ''The Mis-Education of the Negro''. Khalifah's Booksellers & Associates.</ref> To control a people's culture is to control their tools of self-determination in relationship to others.<ref>Akbar, Dr. Na'im (1998).</ref> Like ], proponents assert that what educates one group of people does not necessarily educate and empower another group–so they assert educational priorities distinctly for the Africans in a given context.
The vital necessity for African people to use the weapons of education and history to extricate themselves from this psychological dependency complex/syndrome as a necessary precondition for liberation. If African peoples (the global majority) were to become Afrocentric (Afrocentrized), ... that would spell the ineluctable end of European global power and dominance. This is indeed the fear of Europeans. ... Afrocentrism is a state of mind, a particular subconscious mind-set that is rooted in the ancestral heritage and communal value system. <ref>Linus A. Hoskins, , ] (1992), pp. 249, 251, 253.</ref>
</blockquote>


===Afrocentric theology===
Although Afrocentricity is often associated with ] politics, the movement is not homogeneously liberal. During the 80s and 90s, as politics became more ] in the United States, sociological research became increasingly preoccupied with the problem of the "black ]". Some Afrocentric scholars, influenced by the conservative climate, began to reframe Afrocentric values as a remedy for what they perceived to be the cultural poverty of poor African Americans. American educator Jawanza Kunjufu made the case that ] culture was the root of many social ills.<ref>''Hip-Hop vs MAAT : A Psycho/Social Analysis of Values'' Jawanza Kunjufu 1993</ref> For some Afrocentrists, the contemporary problems of the ] stemmed not from race and class inequality, but rather from a failure to socialize black youth with Afrocentric values.<ref name="AchievingBlackness">''Achieving Blackness: Race, Black Nationalism, and Afrocentrism'' By Algernon Austin. ISBN 0814707076</ref>
{{Further|Black theology|Black church}}
The ] in the United States developed out of the ] of African spirituality and European-American ]; early members of the churches made certain stories their own{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. During the ] years, the idea of deliverance out of ], as in the story of ], was especially important{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. After ] and the restoration of white supremacy, their hope was based on deliverance from segregation and other abuses{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. They found much to respond to in the idea of a personal relationship with ], and shaped their churches by the growth of music and worship styles that related to African as well as European-American traditions.{{citation needed|date=September 2011}}


Twentieth-century "Africentric approaches" to Christian ] and preaching have been more deliberate. Writers and thinkers emphasize "Black presence" in the ], including the idea of a "]".<ref>Peters, Ronald Edward (ed.), ''Africentric Approaches to Christian Ministry: Strengthening Urban Congregations in African American Communities'', University Press of America (2006), {{ISBN|978-0-7618-3264-5}}.</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}}
There were also Afrocentric writers who focused on study of indigenous African civilizations and peoples, to emphasize African history unencumbered by European or ] influence. Primary among them is ], whose book ''The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.'' set out to determine a "purely African body of principles, value systems (and) philosophy of life".<ref>The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D., p. 19 1987</ref>


===Contemporary=== ===Kwanzaa===
In 1966 ] of the black separatist ] created ]; which became the first specifically African American holiday to be widely observed amongst African Americans.<ref>{{cite book|editor=Jaynes, Gerald D.|title=Encyclopedia of African American society|date=2005|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=1452265410|page=420|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UZx2AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT520|access-date=26 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="Kwanzaa Date">{{cite news|url=https://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00B1EFD395C0C738FDDAB0994DB484D81|work=]"|title=The Evening Hours|date=30 December 1983 |access-date=15 December 2006 | first=Ron | last=Alexander}}</ref> Karenga rejected liberation theology and considered the practice of Christianity anti-thetical to the creation of an African-American identity independent from white America.<ref>Karenga, Maulana (1967). "Religion". In Clyde Halisi, James Mtume. The Quotable Karenga. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press. pp. 25. 23769.8.</ref> Karenga said his goal was to "give Blacks an alternative to the existing holiday and give Blacks an opportunity to celebrate themselves and history, rather than simply imitate the practice of the dominant society."<ref name="Mugane2015">{{cite book|last=Mugane|first=John M.|title=The Story of Swahili|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zIwNCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA255|date=15 July 2015|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-89680-489-0|page=255}}</ref>
Studies of African and African-diaspora cultures have adopted a more positive approach to influence by African religious, linguistic and other traditions. For example ]'s seminal 1949 study of the ], a dialect spoken by black communities in ] and ], demonstrated that its idiosyncrasies were not simply incompetent command of ], but incorporated West African linguistic characteristics in vocabulary, grammar, sentence structure, and semantic system.<ref>Wade-Lewis, Margaret (2007) "Lorenzo Dow Turner: Father of Gullah Studies," University of South Carolina Pres</ref> Likewise, religious movements such as ] are now less likely to be characterized as "mere superstition", but understood in terms of links to African traditions. Scholars who adopt such approaches may or may not see their work as Afrocentrist in orientation.{{cn}}<!--So if they don't even necessarily think of themselves as Afrocentrist, this whole paragraph is relevant how, asks Moreschi, suggesting that it looks like a prime candidate for cutting.-->


===Race and Pan-African identity===
Afrocentricity contends that race still exists as a ] and political construct.<ref name="AchievingBlackness">Algernon Austin. Page 195</ref> It argues that for centuries in academia, Eurocentric ideas about history were dominant: ideas such as blacks having no civilizations, no ]s, no cultures, and no histories of any note before coming into contact with Europeans. Further, according to the views of some Afrocentrists, European history has commonly received more attention within the academic community than the history of sub-Saharan African cultures or those of the many Pacific Island peoples. Afrocentrists contend it is important to divorce the historical record from past racism. ]'s book ''Afrocentricity'' (1988) argues that African-Americans should look to African cultures "''as a critical corrective to a displaced agency among Africans''."
{{anchor|race}}
{{Further|Ancient Egyptian race controversy|Pan-Africanism}}
Many Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} seek to challenge concepts such as ], ] perspectives, and race-neutral pedagogies. There are strong ties between Afrocentricity and ].<ref>Leonardo, Zeus (2005). ''Critical Pedagogy and Race'', p. 129 {{ISBN|1-4051-2968-9}}.</ref>


Afrocentrists agree with the current scientific consensus that holds that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite work by Hiernaux<ref name=Hiernaux>{{cite book
Contemporary Afrocentrists may view the movement as ] rather than ].<ref name=Olaniyan2006>{{cite journal
| author = Olaniyan, T. |author=Hiernaux, J.
| year = 2006 |year=1974
|title=The People of Africa
| title = From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History Of An African And African American Discursivepractice)
|publisher=Weidenfeld and Nicolson
| journal = West Africa Review
}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} and Hassan<ref name="Hassan1988">{{cite journal|author=Hassan, F.A.|year=1988|title=The Predynastic of Egypt|journal=Journal of World Prehistory|volume=2|issue=2|pages=135–185|doi=10.1007/BF00975416|jstor=25800540|s2cid=153321928}}</ref> that they believe demonstrates that populations could vary based on micro-evolutionary principles (], drift, selection), and that such variations existed in both living and fossil Africans.<ref name=Keita1992>{{cite journal
| issn = 1525-4488
|author=Keita, S.
}}</ref>They see Afrocentricity as one part of a larger multicultural movement that has begun to shift the focus of historical and cultural studies away from Eurocentrism.<ref name=Banks1993>{{cite journal
|year=1992
| author = Banks, J.A.
|title=Further Studies of Crania From Ancient Northern Africa: An Analysis of Crania From First Dynasty Egyptian Tombs, Using Multiple Discriminant Functions
| year = 1993
|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology
| title = The Canon Debate, Knowledge Construction, and Multicultural Education
|volume=87
| journal = Educational Researcher
|pages=245–54
| volume = 22
|doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330870302
| issue = 5
|pmid=1562056
| pages = 4
|issue=3
| doi = 10.3102/0013189X022005004
}}</ref>Less concerned about specific claims about the race of the Egyptians or other controversial topics, some Afrocentrists believe that the burden of Afrocentricity is to define and develop African agency in the midst of the ] debate and, in doing so, support all forms of multiculturalism.<ref name=Teasley2007>{{cite journal
| author = Teasley, M.
| coauthors = Tyson, E.
| year = 2007
| title = Cultural Wars and the Attack on Multiculturalism: An Afrocentric Critique
| journal = Journal of Black Studies
| volume = 37
| issue = 3
| pages = 390
| doi = 10.1177/0021934706290081
}}</ref> }}</ref>


Afrocentrists have condemned what they consider to be attempts at dividing African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of discredited theories, such as the ] and the ]. These theories, they contend, attempted to identify certain African ethnicities, such as Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalis, as "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They believe that Western academics have traditionally limited the peoples they defined as "Black" Africans to those south of the ], but used broader "Caucasoid" or related categories to classify peoples of Egypt or North Africa. Afrocentrists also believe strongly in the work of certain anthropologists who have suggested that there is little evidence to support that the first North African populations were closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.<ref name="Hiernaux"/>
==Eurocentrism==
{{main|Eurocentrism}}
In part in response to the pressure of Afrocentrists, the study of history and sociology has changed, gradually incorporating Afrocentic ideas as a part of a broader push toward multiculturalism in academia. Afrocentricity has had an impact on the disciplines of ], ] and Africana studies, as well as the study of history as a whole. Adisa A. Alkebulan writes that the Afrocentric idea has been a guiding paradigm in ] ] and ].<ref name="DefendingtheParadigm">''Defending the Paradigm'' Adisa A. Alkebulan, ''Journal of Black Studies'', Vol. 37, No. 3, 410-427 (2007)</ref> These changes were necessary due to the limits of Eurocentrism, especially in earlier western scholarship. For example:


In 1964 Afrocentric scholar ] expressed a belief in such a double standard:
<blockquote>I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. ...<nowiki></nowiki> our colonies, there are Negro slaves dispersed all over Europe, of whom none ever discovered the symptoms of ingenuity; though low people, without education, will start up amongst us, and distinguish themselves in every profession. In Jamaica, indeed, they talk of one Negro as a man of parts and learning; but it is likely he is admired for slender accomplishments, like a parrot who speaks a few words plainly. - ] ] European historian, philosopher and essayist.<ref name=Morton2002>{{cite journal
{{blockquote|But it is only the most gratuitous theory that considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular—the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude that maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race.{{citation needed|date=October 2015}}}}
| author = Morton, E.
| year = 2002
| title = Race And Racism In The Works Of David Hume
| journal = Journal of African Philosophy
| volume = 1
| url = http://www.africaresource.com/afphil/vol1.1/morton.pdf
| accessdate = 2007-11-16
}}</ref></blockquote>


French historian Jean Vercoutter has claimed that ] workers routinely classified Negroid remains as Mediterranean, even though they found such remains in substantial numbers with ancient artefacts.<ref>Jean Vercoutter, ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script''. Paris: UNESCO, 1978, pp. 15–36.</ref>
Such blatant racism was common among mainstream scholars, educators and historians well into the 20th century. {{Fact|date=November 2007}} Afrocentrists contend that the denial, denigration and appropriation of black historical and cultural achievements make it important to study world history with new eyes. Thus, a primary concern of Afrocentricity has been to engage the biased methods and approaches used by some European scholars, and the European-dominated intellectual community, in relation to all the people of Africa and the diaspora. {{Fact|date=November 2007}}


Some Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} have adopted a ] perspective that people of color are all "African people" or "] Africans," citing physical characteristics they exhibit in common with Black Africans. Afrocentric scholar ] writes that they are all part of the "global African community." Some Afrocentric writers include in the ] the ] of India, "]s" of Southeast Asia (], the ] and ]); and the ] peoples of Australia and Melanesia.{{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
Early Afrocentrists found that scholars used theories of white civilizers flowing into Africa to explain the civilizations there, as they were unwilling to attribute any elaborate developments to blacks. Today, even Afrocentric critics such as ] at times finds common ground with Afrocentrists on this topic. In her "Not Out Of Africa", Lefkowitz notes that a number of earlier historical theories that suggested Caucasians initially swept into ancient Egypt from the north have been rendered untenable by modern research. By contrast, evidence suggests a movement of peoples from the South, up from the Sahara into the Nilotic zone.{{Fact|date=November 2007}}


===Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas theories===
"Recent work on skeletons and ] suggests that the people who settled in the Nile valley, like all of humankind, came from somewhere south of the ]; they were not (as some nineteenth-century scholars had supposed) invaders from the North. See Bruce G. Trigger, "The Rise of Civilization in Egypt," Cambridge History of Africa (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982), vol I, pp 489-90; S. O. Y. Keita, "Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships," History in Africa 20 (1993) 129-54."
{{Main|Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories}}
In the 1970s, ] advanced the theory that the complex civilizations of the Americas were the result of trans-oceanic influence from the Egyptians or other African civilizations. Such a claim is his primary thesis in ''They Came Before Columbus'', published in 1978. The few ] writers seek to establish that the ] people, who built the first highly complex civilization in ] and are considered by some to be the mother civilization for all other civilizations of Mesoamerica, were deeply influenced by Africans. Van Sertima said that the Olmec civilization was a hybrid one of Africans and Native Americans. His theory of pre-Columbian American-African contact has since met with considerable and detailed opposition by scholars of Mesoamerica. Van Sertima has been accused of "doctoring" and twisting data to fit his conclusions, inventing evidence, and ignoring the work of respected Central and South American scholars to advance his own theory.<ref name="Ortiz1997"/> Mainstream historians of Mesoamerica overwhelmingly reject that view with detailed rebuttals.<ref name="Ortiz1997">{{cite journal
|author1=Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo
|author-link=Bernardo Ortiz de Montellano
|author2=Gabriel Haslip Viera
|author3=Warren Barbour
|year=1997
|title=They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s
|journal=Ethnohistory
|pages=199–234
|volume=44
|doi=10.2307/483368
|issue=2
|jstor=483368
}}</ref>


Claims have been also forwarded contending that African civilizations were founding influences on the Chinese ] cultures.<ref name=Ortiz1997/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html |title=Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism |access-date=13 November 2007 |last=Sherwin |first=Elisabeth |publisher=Davis Community Network | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017065428/http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html| archive-date= 17 October 2007 | url-status= live}}</ref>
==Definitions of Pan-African identity==
]ns of New Guinea have ] and ] physical characteristics and are considered black in some cultures despite being genetically closer to ]ns than to ]ns. <ref>http://www.atlapedia.com/online/countries/papuanew.htm</ref>{{cn}}]] The relationship among racial, cultural and continental identities is one of the more difficult problems in Afrocentic thought. Some authors have used the concept of black racial identity to include among "African" peoples certain populations generally thought of as non-Africans, such as the ] (sometimes called "]") peoples of Australia and New Guinea, the ] of India, and the people of the rest of the ].


===Afrocentrism and Ancient Egypt===
Some writers include in the ] the "]s" of Southeast Asia (], ], ], ] and ], and ]); and the "Africoid," aboriginal peoples of Melanesia, ], and ]. Some Afrocentrists also claim that the ] of ] came from Africa, though this is not a widespread view among historians of Mesoamerica.{{cn}} Afrocentrists who adopt this approach contend that such peoples are African in a racial sense, just as the white inhabitants of modern Australia may be said to be European.
{{Main|Ancient Egyptian race controversy}}
Several Afrocentrists have claimed that important cultural characteristics of ancient ] were indigenous to Africa and that these features were present in other early African civilizations<ref name=Diop1964>{{cite journal
|author=Diop, C.A.
|year=1964
|title=Evolution of the Negro world'
|volume=23
|issue=51
|pages=5–15
}}</ref> such as the later ] and the ] civilizations of ].<ref>Bruce Williams, "The lost pharaohs of Nubia", in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), ''Egypt Revisited'' (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).</ref> Scholars who have held this view include ], ], ], ], ], and ] as well as the Afrocentrist writers ] and ]. The claim has also been made by many Afrocentric scholars that the Ancient Egyptians themselves were ] (sub-saharan African) rather than North African/Maghrebi, and that the various invasions on Egypt resulted in the "Africanity" of Ancient Egypt becoming diluted, resulting in the modern diversity seen today.<ref name="Ivan van Sertima 1994">{{cite book|author=Van Sertima, Ivan|title=Egypt, Child of Africa|author-link=Ivan van Sertima|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y7KmBTz2vUoC|year=1994|publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=1-56000-792-3}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} Examining this view, Egyptologist ], wrote that "Any characterization of race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not on scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterise the Egyptians as 'black', while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans". Smith, however, expressed criticism of Egyptologists and Afrocentrists that defined ancient Egyptians "as members of an essentialist racial category" with perceived "Caucasoid" or "Negroid/Africoid" phenotypes".<ref>{{cite book |last=Smith |first=Stuart Tyson |date=2001 |title=The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt |volume=3 |editor-first=Donald |editor-last=Redford |publisher=] |pages=27–28}}</ref>


As historian ] argued, mainstream ] and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology, viewing it as "theurapetic mythology" for black people, since it fails to provide sufficient evidence or persuasive interpretations to back up its claims.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fritze |first=Ronald H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vkSkDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA333 |title=Egyptomania: A History of Fascination, Obsession and Fantasy |date=2021-02-04 |publisher=Reaktion Books |isbn=978-1-78023-685-8 |pages=333 |language=en |quote=Mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology. It is viewed as a 'therapeutic mythology' that is not based on convincing evidence or persuasive interpretations.}}</ref>
Critics argue that such peoples were not recent ] from Africa. The entire population of the world might just as reasonably be considered part of an African race, according to the ] model of ].{{cn}} Studies show that some members of these darker-skinned ] and "]" ]ns are genetically closer to one another than they are to indigenous Africans. In such matters, Afrocentrists adopt the ] perspective that such people of color are all "African people" or "] Africans." As Afrocentric scholar ] writes, they are all part of the "global African community." This view, however, disregards how most "]" ] identify themselves and the conclusions of geneticists about population relatedness.{{cn}}


Stephen Howe, professor in the history and cultures of colonialism at Bristol University,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Author Page |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/stephen-howe/|website=openDemocracy|date=23 June 2012 |access-date=2020-05-07}}</ref> writes that contrary to "Afrocentric speculation, depending on undocumented assertions that the relatively light-skinned people of the lower Nile today descend from ] rather than earlier residents". Howe also cited a 1995 publication which stated "the latest major synthetic work on African populations is firmly of the opinion that "It was not the Arabs physically displaced Egyptians. Instead the Egyptians were transformed by relatively small number of immigrants bringing in new ideas, which, when disseminated, created a wider ethnic identity".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howe|first=Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes|publisher=Verso|year=1998|isbn=9781859848739|pages=137}}</ref>
==Views on race==


S.O.Y. Keita, a ] and research affilitate at the ] who has been described as sympathetic to Afrocentrism,<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wRdJAAAAYAAJ&q=shomarka+keita+afrocentrist |title=Cornell University Courses of Study |date=1996 |publisher=Cornell University |pages=423 |language=en |quote=We shall then read from the works of "Afrocentrist" writers of history including Chancellor Williams, Yosef ben Yochanen and Chiekh Anta Diop as well as those of sympathetic scholars such as St. Clair Drake and Shomarka Keita.}}</ref> but defined his position as that "it is not a question of “African” “influence”; Ancient Egypt was organically African. Studying early Egypt in its ]n context is not “Afrocentric,” but simply correct".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kamugisha |first1=Aaron |title=Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko |journal=Race & Class |date=July 2003 |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=31–60 |doi=10.1177/0306396803045001002 |s2cid=145514370 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306396803045001002 |language=en |issn=0306-3968}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko |url=https://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/finally-in-africa-egypt-from-diop-to-celenko/ |website=SEYFETTİN |language=en |date=16 January 2007}}</ref> Keita has argued that the original inhabitants of the Nile Valley were primarily a variety of indigenous Northeast Africans from the areas of the desiccating Sahara and more southerly areas. He reviewed studies on the biological affinities of the Ancient Egyptian population and described the skeletal morphologies of early dynastic Egyptian remains as a "Saharo-tropical African variant". He also noted that over time gene flow from the Near East and Europe added more genetic variability to the region.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Keita |first1=S. O. Y. |title=Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships |journal=History in Africa |date=1993 |volume=20 |pages=129–154 |doi=10.2307/3171969 |jstor=3171969 |s2cid=162330365 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3171969 |issn=0361-5413}}</ref> In 2022, Keita argued that some genetic studies have a "default racialist or racist approach" and should be interpreted in a framework with other sources of evidence.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Keita Shomarka. |title="Ancient Egyptian "Origins and "Identity" In Ancient Egyptian society : challenging assumptions, exploring approaches |date=2022 |isbn=978-0367434632 |location=Abingdon, Oxon |pages=124–135}}</ref> Several other academics, including ], ],
], a Sudanese Dinka, as ''Caucasoid''.]]Afrocentrists hold that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite the nonracial approach of Hiernaux <ref name=Hiernaux>{{cite book
Bruce Williams, ], ], Lanny Bell and A.J. Boyce across various disciplines have contended that Ancient Egypt was fundamentally an African civilization, with cultural and biological connections to Egypt's African neighbors.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Celenko |first1=Theodore |title=Egypt in Africa |date=1996 |publisher=Indianapolis Museum of Art |isbn=0936260645 |location=Indianapolis, Ind. |pages=1–134}}</ref>
| author = Hiernaux, J.
| year = 1974
| title = The People of Africa
| publisher = Weidenfeld and Nicolson
| isbn =
}}</ref> and Hassan <ref name=Hassan1988>{{cite journal
| author = Hassan, F.A.
| year = 1988
| title = The Predynastic of Egypt
| journal = Journal of World Prehistory
| volume = 2
| issue = 2
| pages = 135-185
| url = http://www.springerlink.com/index/X47P55763452G668.pdf
| accessdate = 2007-11-13
}}</ref> which demonstrates that populations can vary based on microevolutionary principles (climate adaptation, drift, selection), and that this variation is present in both living and fossil Africans.<ref name=Keita1992>{{cite journal
| author = Keita, S.
| year = 1992
| title = Further Studies of Crania From Ancient Northern Africa: An Analysis of Crania From First Dynasty Egyptian Tombs, Using Multiple Discriminant Functions
| journal = American Journal of Physical Anthropology
| volume = 87
| pages = 245-54
| doi = 10.1002/ajpa.1330870302
}}</ref> They condemn attempts to split African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of older, discredited theories such as the "Hamitic Hypothesis" and the ] that attempted to separate out African groups like Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalians into "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They also charge a double standard at play in Western academia which has made little attempt to define a "true white", <ref>Keita, op. cit</ref>but does not hesitate to define Blacks as narrowly as possibly, while allocating as much as possible to broad "Caucasoid" or other categories when it comes to Egypt or other African civilizations.


Scholars have challenged the various assertions of Afrocentrists on the cultural and biological characteristics of Ancient Egyptian civilization and its people. At a ] Symposium in the 1970s, some of the participants, including ], ], ] and ] expressed "profound" disagreement with the "Black", homogeneous hypothesis.<ref>UNESCO, "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script; Proceedings", (Paris, 1978), pp. 3–134.</ref> Despite contestations, ] decided to include his "Origin of the ancient Egyptians" in the General History of Africa, with an editorial comment mentioning the disagreement. However, Diop's chapter was credited as a "painstakingly researched contribution"<ref name="auto">{{cite book |title=Ancient civilizations of Africa |date=1990 |publisher=J. Currey |location=London |isbn=0852550928 |pages=43–46 |edition=Abridged}}</ref> in the general conclusion of the symposium report by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur, Professor Jean Devisse,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mokhtar |first1=Gamal |title=Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Unesco International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa) |date=1990 |publisher=Currey |isbn=978-0-85255-092-2 |page=33 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gZWuVAL2GooC |language=en}}</ref> which nevertheless lead to a "real lack of balance" in the discussion among participants.<ref>{{cite book |title=The peopling of ancient Egypt and the deciphering of Meroitic script : proceedings of the symposium held in Cairo from 28 January to 3 February 1974. |date=1978 |publisher=Unesco |isbn=92-3-101605-9 |location=Paris |pages=86, 93–94, 99}}</ref> The ancient world did not employ racial categories such as "Black" or "White" as they had no conception of "race", but rather labeled groups according to their land of origin and cultural traits. However, Keita studying the controversy, finds simplistic political appellations (in the negative or affirmative) describing ancient populations as "black" or "white" to be inaccurate and instead focuses on the ancestry of ancient Egypt as being a part of the native and diverse biological variation of Africa, which includes a variety of phenotypes and skin gradients.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1525/an.2007.48.9.19 |volume=48 |title=Advancing Biocultural Perspectives: Optimism from a Workshop |year=2007 |journal=Anthropology News |pages=19–20 |last1=Agustà |issue=9}}; see also "Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions About Human Variation", Frank L'Engle Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelago's, Current Anthropology. (2005); An Analysis of Crania From Tell-Duweir Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S. O. Y. Keita, ''American Journal of Physical Anthropology'', 75: 375–390 (1988); "Interpreting African Genetic Diversity, S. O. Y. Keita & Rick Kittles, ''African Archaeological Review'', Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999); "Race": Confusion About Zoological and Social Taxonomies, and Their Places in Science", S. O. Y. Keita, A. J. Boyce, Field Museum of Chicago Institute of Biological Anthropology, Oxford University, ''American Journal of Human Biology'', 13: 569–575 (2001).</ref>
Afrocentric writer C.A. Diop captured this belief in a double standard as follows:
<blockquote>"But it is only the most gratuitous theory which considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular--the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude which maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race." (1964) <ref>Evolution of the Negro world' in Presence Africaine (1964)</ref></blockquote>


Egyptian Egyptologist ] has gone on record as saying that the Ancient Egyptians were not black and “We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist ] at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in ], it occurred only here”.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Samil |first=Nehar |date=2021 |title=Claims that Ancient Egyptians were black untrue: Zahi Hawass |url=https://dailynewsegypt.com/2021/04/14/claims-that-ancient-egyptians-were-african-untrue-zahi-hawass/ |access-date=2022-09-08 |website=Daily News Egypt}}</ref> In 2022, Hawass reiterated his view that "Africans have nothing to do with the pyramids ]"<ref>{{cite web |title=Egyptians Create Viral Hashtag Against Kevin Hart's Cairo Performance |date=14 August 2024 |url=https://egyptianstreets.com/2022/12/19/egyptians-create-viral-hashtag-against-kevin-harts-cairo-performance/amp/}}</ref> and stated that Africans "ruled in Egypt in the late Era, at the time of the 25th dynasty". Hawass also accused some international figures of African descent that promoted Afrocentrism of ] and ] of Egyptian history.{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}
Afrocentrists write that European scholars have at times carefully defined Black peoples as narrowly as possible, creating an extreme "true Negro" south of the Sahara, while allocating all else not meeting the extreme type to "Caucasoid" groupings, including Ethiopians, Egyptians and Nubians (C. G. Seligman's Races of Africa, 1966)<ref>C. G. Seligman's Races of Africa, (Oxford University Press: 1966)</ref> French historian Jean Verncoutter wrote that selective grouping was common among scholars where the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians was involved. Negroid remains were routinely classified as "Mediterranean" even though they were recorded in substantial numbers by archaeological workers. ( Vercoutter 1978- The Peopling of ancient Egypt)<ref>Jean Vercoutter, The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 15-36.</ref>


In 2008, Stuart Tyson Smith expressed criticism of a facial reconstruction of Tutankhamun as "very light-skinned" which reflected "bias" and "predictably and justifiably, it has provoked protests from Afrocentrists" as "Egyptologists have been strangely reluctant to admit that the ancient Egyptians were rather dark-skinned Africans, especially the farther south one goes".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1=Stuart Tyson |title=Review of From Slave to Pharaoh: The Black Experience of Ancient Egypt by Donald Redford. |url=https://www.academia.edu/43275262 |website=Near Eastern Archaeology 71:3 |date=1 January 2008}}</ref>
There is some evidence that East African groups including ]s and ]s, have strong genetic similarities to Caucasians.<ref name=Cavalli-sforza1988>{{cite journal
| author = Cavalli-sforza, L.L.
| coauthors = Piazza, A.; Menozzi, P.; Mountain, J.
| year = 1988
| title = Reconstruction of Human Evolution: Bringing Together Genetic, Archaeological, and Linguistic Data
| journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
| volume = 85
| issue = 16
| pages = 6002-6006
| url = http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/16/6002
| accessdate = 2007-11-16
}}</ref> According to anthropologist ], "When the nonadaptive aspects of craniofacial configuration are the basis for assessment, the Somalis cluster with Europeans before showing a tie with the people of West Africa or the Congo Basin".<ref name=Brace1993>{{cite journal
| author = Brace, C.L.
| coauthors = Tracer, D.P.; Yaroch, L.A.; Robb, J.; Brandt, K.; Nelson, A.R.
| year = 1993
| title = Clines and clusters versus “Race”: A test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the Nile
| journal = Yearbook of Physical Anthropology
| volume = 36
| pages = 1-31
| doi = 10.1002/ajpa.1330360603
}}</ref> In agreement with the Afrocentric view, many anthropologists also point out that there is little evidence to suggest that these populations are closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.<ref name="Hiernaux"/> Genetic analyses have indicated that ], in particular, are overwhelmingly indigenous. <ref name=HIGH-FREQUENCY-OF-Y-CHROMOSOME-LINEAGES>{{cite web
|title=High frequencies of Y chromosome lineages characterized by E3b1, DYS19-11, DYS392-12 in Somali males
|url=http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v13/n7/full/5201390a.html
|publisher=]
|date=]
|accessdate=2007-02-12}}</ref>


In 2011, ], professor of Egyptian Archaeology and Philology argued that the UNESCO-sponsored conference on the General History of Africa in 1974 "did not change the Eurocentric climate of research" and of the need to incorporate both African-centred studies and White European, academic perspectives. He later outlined that "research conferences and publications on the history and language of Kemet remain dominated ... by those brought up and trained in European, not African societies and languages (which include Arabic)".<ref>{{cite book |title=Egypt in its African context : proceedings of the conference held at the Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, 2–4 October 2009 |date=2011 |publisher=Archaeopress |location=Oxford |isbn=978-1407307602 |pages=7–9}}</ref>
==Role of Ancient Egypt==
{{seealso|Ancient Egypt and race}}
]
Several Afrocentrists have said that important cultural characteristics of ancient ] are indigenous to Africa and that these features are present in other African civilizations.<ref name=Diop1964>{{cite journal
| author = Diop, C.A.
| year = 1964
| title = Evolution of the Negro world'
| volume = 23
| issue = 51
| pages = 5-15
}}</ref> Critical of much of ] ], Afrocentrists write that the study of ancient Egyptian culture has been artificially disconnected from other early African civilizations, such as ] and the ] civilizations of ] — particularly in light of the fact that archaeological evidence clearly indicates a confluence among this cultural triad.<ref>Bruce Williams, 'The lost pharaohs of Nubia', in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), Egypt Revisited (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).</ref> This perspective, championed by the ]ese scholar ], is known formally as the Cultural Unity Theory. This related theories have proponents outside Afrocentric circles, among them Bruce Williams of the ].<ref>''Forebears of Menes in Nubia: Myth or Reality?'' Bruce Williams Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1 (Jan., 1987), pp. 15-26</ref> Afrocentrists also claim that the ancient Egyptians made significant contributions to ancient ] and ] during their formative periods. The more conventional belief among archaeologists and Egyptologists such as Frank J. Yurco and Fekri Hassan is that ancient Egyptian civilization comprised a mix of North and sub-Saharan African elements that typified Egyptians ever since, and that the Egyptian people were generally coextensive with other Africans in the Nile valley.<ref name=fyurcobow> {{cite web|url=http://homelink.cps-k12.org/teachers/filiopa/files/AC383EB269C648AAAA659593B9FC358C.pdf |title=“Were the Ancient Egyptians Black or White?” |accessdate=2007-10-03 |last=Yurco |first=Frank |publisher=BAR magazine }}</ref>


=== African-American Afrocentric "hoteps" and the far-right ===
Afrocentrists claim a growing acceptance of Egypt as an African culture with its own unique elements, citing mainstream scholars like Bruce Trigger who decries many approaches of the past as 'marred by a confusion of race, language, and culture and by an accompanying racism'.<ref>Bruce Trigger, 'Nubian, Negro, Black, Nilotic?', in Sylvia Hochfield and Elizabeth Riefstahl (eds), Africa in Antiquity: the arts of Nubia and the Sudan, Vol. 1 (New York, Brooklyn Museum, 1978).
{{main|Hoteps}}
</ref> and the approach of Egyptologist Frank Yurco, who sees the Egyptians, Nubians, Ethiopians, Somalians, and others as one localized Nile valley population, that need not be artificially clustered into racial percentages.<ref>Frank Yurco, "An Egyptological Review", 1996 -in Mary R. Lefkowitz and Guy MacLean Rogers, Black Athena Revisited, 1996, The University of North Carolina Press, p. 62-100</ref> Afrocentrists also point of the work of Czech anthropologist Eugene Strouhal which describes both physical, cultural and material links of ancient Egypt with the peoples of Nubia and the Sahara, ( Strouhal (1968, 1971- Strouhal, E., ‘Evidence of the early penetration of Negroes into prehistoric Egypt)<ref></ref>


] who use the Black Egyptian hypothesis as a source of ] have been called "the ]" (after the Egyptian word '']'').<ref name="Lovett">{{cite journal |last1=Lovett |first1=Miranda |title=Reflecting on the Rise of the Hoteps |journal=Sapiens |date=July 21, 2020 |url=https://www.sapiens.org/culture/hotep/ |access-date=July 7, 2021}}</ref> The term has often been used disparagingly by non-hotep African-Americans,<ref name="Damon">{{cite news |last1=Young |first1=Damon |url= https://www.theroot.com/hotep-explained-1790854506 |title=Hotep, Explained |work=The Root |access-date=July 7, 2021 |date=2016-03-05}}</ref> some of whom have linked the ideology of the hotep community – which is ], ] and ] – to the ].<ref name="Sheffield">{{cite news |last1=Sheffield |first1=Matthew |title=Laura Ingraham meets the Afrocentric "alt-right" — and it's every bit as weird as it sounds |url=https://www.salon.com/2018/04/23/laura-ingraham-meets-the-afrocentric-alt-right-and-its-every-bit-as-weird-as-that-sounds/ |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=Salon |date=April 23, 2018}}</ref> Hoteps have been described as promoting ] and ] about black people and black history.<ref name="Lovett" /> Some have argued hotep beliefs are too narrow-minded (focusing only on Egypt as opposed to other aspects of ]),<ref>{{cite news |last1=Bastién |first1=Angelica Jade |title='Insecure' Season 1, Episode 2: Failure to Change |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/16/arts/television/insecure-season-1-episode-2-failure-to-change.html |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=October 17, 2016}}</ref> and ] argue that hoteps perpetuate ] by policing women's sexuality and not criticizing predatory black men.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Bowen |first1=Sesali |title=What Dear White People Got Right About Hoteps |url=https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/05/198583/hotep-meaning-dear-white-people-slang |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=refinery29 |date=May 8, 2018}}</ref>
However, this Afrocentric view still finds itself in direct opposition to the conclusions of Eurocentric scholars such as ] historian ], who regarded the ancient Egyptian cultural sphere as having died out without leaving a successor, and who regarded as "myth" the idea that Egypt was the "origin of Western civilization." However, there are numerous accounts in the historical record dating back several centuries wherein scholars have written of an Egypt and its contributions to Mediterranean civilizations.<ref name=Roth1995>{{cite journal

| author = Roth, A.
===Alkebulan===
| year = 1995
Among Afrocentrists the name 'Alkebulan' (also spelled 'Al Kebulan' or 'Alkebu Lan') is sometimes used a replacement for 'Africa.' Users often erroneously claim that it derives from the ] for 'Land of the Blacks' (in reality '']''), or alternatively that it comes from one or more indigenous African languages and means 'Garden of Life' or 'Motherland'.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Maku |first1=Bright |title=Alkebulan: Understanding the origins behind Africa's original name |url=https://www.skabash.com/alkebulan-africas-original-name/ |website=Skabash! |date=6 February 2023 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref> The earliest record of the term 'Alkebulan' is the introduction to an 1813 Spanish poem celebrating the ], in which the author claimed an Arabic origin of the term. In the 20th century it was popularized by ], though this is sometimes incorrectly credited to ] in a non-existent book called “The Kemetic History of Afrika”.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Ancient Name for Africa was "Alkebulan" meaning "Mother of Mankind" |url=https://theafricanhistory.com/770 |website=The African History |date=3 July 2020 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Alkebulan: The Original Name Of Africa And How To Pronounce It |url=https://africaglobalradio.com/alkebulan-the-original-name-of-africa-and-how-to-pronounce-it/ |website=Africa Global Radio |date=15 March 2022 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Jacobs |first1=Frank |title=Africa, uncolonized: a detailed look at an alternate continent |url=https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/africa-uncolonized/ |website=Big Think |date=11 November 2014 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref>
| title = Building Bridges to Afrocentrism: A Letter to My Egyptological Colleagues

| journal = Newsletter of the American Research Center in Egypt
==Reception==
| pages = 167-8

| doi = 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23151.x
Afrocentrism has encountered opposition from mainstream scholars who charge it with historical inaccuracy, scholarly ineptitude, and racism.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Early |first=Gerald |author-link=Gerald Early |date=17 May 2002 |title=Afrocentrism |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Afrocentrism |access-date=2022-08-02 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>
}}</ref>

], a critic of the movement, summarises its goals in the preface to his book '']'',<ref name="ReferenceA">Yaacov Shavit, ''History in Black: African-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past'', Frank Cass Publishers, 2001, pp. vii.</ref> in which he states:

{{blockquote|Thus, if historical myths and legends, or an invented history, play such a major role in the founding of every national reconstruction, the question that should concern us here is the nature of the distinct style in which black Americans imagine their past. The answer to this question is that radical Afrocentrism, the subject of this study, which plays a central role in shaping the modern historical world-view of a large section of the African-American (or Afro-American) community, is far more than an effort to follow the line taken by many ] groups and nations in modern rewriting, inventing or developing collective identity and national history. Rather, it is a large-scale historical project to rewrite the history of the whole of humankind from an Afrocentric point of view. The result is a new reconstruction of world history: it is a universal history.}}

Other critics, such as ], contend that the Afrocentric historical approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Stearns |first=Peter N. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Qx4ZAQAAIAAJ |title=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World: 1750 to the Present |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-517632-2 |pages=59 |quote=Opponents of Afrocentrism claim that this approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. Mary Lefkowitz, in ''Not Out of Africa'', argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and not in sound scholarship. |language=en}}</ref> She argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in ] and ] rather than sound scholarship.<ref name=":3" /> In '']'',<ref name=":4">* by ], '']''.</ref> philosophy professor ] labeled Afrocentrism "]". He argued that Afrocentrism's prime goal was to encourage ] and ethnic pride in order to effectively combat the destructive consequences of cultural and universal racism.<ref name=":4" /><ref>Robert Todd Carroll (2003), ''The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions'', New York: John Wiley & Sons, {{ISBN|0-471-27242-6}} (paperback). p. 148</ref> Professor of history ] has described Afrocentrism as "a mythology that is racist, reactionary, essentially therapeutic and is eurocentrism in black face."<ref name="Banner-haley2003">{{cite journal
|author=Banner-haley, C.P.
|year=2003
|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism
|journal=Journal of Southern History
|volume=69
|issue=3
|pages=663–665
|url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002551537
|access-date=13 November 2007
|doi=10.2307/30040016
|jstor=30040016
|last2=Walker
|first2=Clarence E.}}</ref>

Classicist ] rejects ]'s theories about Egyptian contributions to Greek civilization as being faulty scholarship. She writes that ancient Egyptian texts show little similarity to Greek philosophy. Lefkowitz states that ] could not have stolen his ideas from the great ] as James suggested, because the library was founded after Aristotle's death. On the basis of such errors, Lefkowitz calls Afrocentrism "an excuse to teach myth as history."<ref>Lefkowitz 1996, pp. 125–126, 137–141</ref> Mary Lefkowitz in 1997 whilst criticising elements of Afrocentrism had acknowledged that the origins of the ancient Egyptians were more clear due to the "recent evidence on skeletons and DNA suggests that the people who settled in the Nile valley, like all of humankind, came from somewhere south of the Sahara; they were not (as some nineteenth-century scholars had supposed) invaders from the North".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lefkowitz |first1=Mary R. |title=Not out of Africa : how Afrocentrism became an excuse to teach myth as history |date=1996 |location=New York |isbn=046509838X |pages=242}}</ref>

In 2002, Ibrahim Sundiata wrote in the '']'' that:

{{blockquote|The word "Afrocentric" has been traced by Derrick Alridge to the American historian W.E.B. Du Bois, who employed it in the early 1960s. During the 1970s, Molefi Kete Asante appropriated the term, insisting that he was the only person equipped to define it, and asserting that even the holy archangels Du Bois and ] had an imperfect and immature grasp of a concept that finds ultimate expression in his own pontifications. Subsequently, it became a catchall "floating signifier," nebulous, unstable, and infinitely mutable.<ref>, ''American Historical Review'', (1996).</ref>}}


Literature and languages scholar ], a supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls,<ref name="cain">{{cite journal | last1 = Hope Felder | first1 = Cain | year = 1994 | title = Afrocentrism, the Bible, and the Politics of Difference | url = http://www.nathanielturner.com/twoscholarsdiscussafrocentrism.htm | journal = The Princeton Seminary Bulletin | volume = XV | issue = 2 }}</ref> including:
==Criticism==
Critics write that some Afrocentric research lacks scientific merit and that it seeks to supplant and counter one form of ] with another, rather than attempt to arrive at the truth. Among these critics, ]'s ''Not out of Africa'' is regarded by some as the foremost critical work. In it, she contends Afrocentric historical claims are grounded in ] and ] rather than sound scholarship. Like most other mainstream scholars, she rejects James's views on the ground that his sources predate the deciphering of Egyptian ]. She contends that actual ancient Egyptian texts show little similarity to Greek philosophy. She also contends that Bernal underestimates the distinctiveness of Greek intellectual culture. Asante and others, however, dispute her conclusions.<ref>'''' By Molefi Kete Asante</ref> ] has also characterized Afrocentricity as "an excuse to teach myth as history".<ref name=Lefkowitz1996>{{cite journal
| author = Lefkowitz, M.R.
| year = 1996
| title = Not Out of Africa: How" Afrocentrism" Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History
| url = http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&id=LDWuwunDw1IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Not+Out+of+Africa:+How+Afrocentrism+Became+an+Excuse+to+Teach+Myth+as+History.&ots=FnJlEg_Sxl&sig=qPncgqbSqQtn59wgSb-pP6dEG0U
| accessdate = 2007-11-13
}}</ref> Likewise, African-American History professor Clarence E. Walker has proclaimed it to be "a mythology that is racist, reactionary, and essentially therapeutic".<ref name=Banner-haley2003>{{cite journal
| author = Banner-haley, C.P.
| year = 2003
| title = We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism.
| journal = Journal of Southern History
| volume = 69
| issue = 3
| pages = 663-665
| url = http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002551537
| accessdate = 2007-11-13
}}</ref>Often, the work that critics of Afrocentricity call "bad scholarship" is also rejected by Afrocentrists. Alkebulan writes that critics’ have used of the claims of what she calls "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."<ref name="DefendingtheParadigm">''Defending the Paradigm'' Adisa A. Alkebulan Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, 410-427 (2007)</ref> Cain Hope Felder, a supporter of Afrocentric ideas writes that it is important for Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls.<ref name="cain">Cain Hope Felder, "" The Princeton Seminary Bulletin ( 1994) Volume XV, Number 2.</ref> These include:
* Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism. * Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.
* Adopting multiculturalism as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world. * Adopting ] as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world.
* Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.<ref name="cain">...</ref> * Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.<ref name="cain"/>


] writes that although Afrocentricity can mean many things, the popular press has generally given most attention to its most outlandish theories.<ref name="Glazer1997">Nathan Glazer, ''We Are All Multiculturalists Now'', Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 {{ISBN|0-674-94836-X}}.</ref> Glazer agrees with many of the findings and conclusions presented in Lefkowitz's book ''Not Out of Africa''. Yet he also argues that Afrocentrism often presents legitimate and relevant scholarship.<ref name="Glazer1997"/> The late ] was also a critic of Afrocentrism. He wrote:
According to an article in ], a fringe group of Afrocentrists have asserted that blacks possess superior and supernatural traits that can be ascribed to the magical qualities of melanin. They also assert that the Ancient Egyptians could fly with gliders. These ideas represent the views of extremists within the Afrocentric movement. While approving of the legitimate aims of Afrocentricity, many educators, both black and white, are concerned that the excesses of this relatively small group will subvert the very goals Afrocentricity seeks to accomplish. "''It defeats what we're trying to do because it's going to be discredited,''" says David Pilgrim, a sociologist at Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan. "''All the good reasons why it was proposed are going to come back tenfold as negatives on the black community -- and on the black intellectual community specifically.''" Pilgrim, who is black, calls the claims of the extremists "''pseudoscience''" and "''reverse Jensenism,''" referring to the controversial theories of ], who argued that blacks were genetically less intelligent on average than whites.<ref name=Jaroff1994>{{cite journal

| author = Jaroff, L.
{{Blockquote|Populist Afrocentrism was the perfect social theory for the upwardly mobile black petty bourgeoisie. It gave them a sense of ethnic superiority and cultural originality, without requiring the hard, critical study of historical realities. It provided a philosophical blueprint to avoid concrete struggle within the real world.... It was, in short, only the latest theoretical construct of a politics of racial identity, a world-view designed to discuss the world but never really to change it.<ref name="autogenerated192"/>}}
| year = 1994

| title = Teaching reverse racism
Some Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} agree in rejecting those works which critics have characterized as examples of bad scholarship. Adisa A. Alkebulan states that the work of Afrocentric scholars is not fully appreciated because critics use the claims of "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."<ref name="DefendingtheParadigm">Adisa A. Alkebulan, "Defending the Paradigm", ''Journal of Black Studies'', Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 410–427 (2007).</ref>
| journal = Time

| volume = 142
In 1996, the historian ] critically reviewed the new work of Mary Lefkowitz on Afrocentrism as "Eurocentric". He criticized her book ''Not out of Africa: How Afrocentrism became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History'' for what he saw as her neglect of the African-American historic literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Meier believes she fails to take the African-American experiences into account, to the extent that she "fails to answer the question raised in this book's subtitle".<ref>Meier, August, , ''Journal of American History'', December 1996.</ref>{{Irrelevant citation|reason=This is a section on Afrocentrism's reception. Not Lefkowitz's works.|date=August 2022}}
| issue = 17

| pages = 74-76
] describes the controversy over Afrocentrism as a ]. He believes certain "epistemologies" are warring with each other: the "epistemology of blackness" argues for the "responsibilities and potential of black peoples to function in and contribute to the progress of civilization."<ref>Maghan Keita, ''Race and the Writing of History: Riddling the Sphinx'', p. 7.</ref>
}}</ref> However, these fringe theories are not usually incorporated into Afrocentric curriculum and are seen by many Afrocentric academics as trivial distractions to the central issue.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://way.net/dissonance/sundiata.html |title=AFROCENTRISM The Argument We're Really Having |accessdate=2007-11-13 |last=Sundiata |first=Ibrahim |publisher=DISSONANCE }}</ref>


==List of prominent authors== ==List of prominent authors==
* ],<ref>.</ref>{{Better source needed|date=January 2021}} professor, author and activist: ''Yurugu: An Afrikan-centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior'' (Trenton: Africa World Press, 1994).
* ], professor, author: ''Afrocentricity: The theory of Social Change''; ''The Afrocentric Idea''; ''The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten''
* ], professor, author: ''Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change''; ''The Afrocentric Idea''; ''The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten''
* ], college professor and lecturer; founder, Temple of the Black Messiah, School of History and Religion; co-founder and creative director, Fourth Dynasty Publishing Company, Silver Spring, ]
* ], leader of the ], author of the "Journal of the Moorish Paradigm"
* ], Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, ] * ], Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, ]
* ] ,, author: ''The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality''; ''Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology''; ''Precolonial Black Africa''; ''The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity''; ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script'' * ],<ref>{{cite web|last1=Clarke|first1=John Henrik|author-link1=John Henrik Clarke|title=Cheikh Anta Diop and the New Light on African History|url=http://nbufront.org/html/MastersMuseums/JHClarke/Contemporaries/CheikhAntaDiop.html|website=nbufront.org|publisher=National Black United Front|access-date=15 October 2015|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219211731/http://nbufront.org/html/MastersMuseums/JHClarke/Contemporaries/CheikhAntaDiop.html|archive-date=19 February 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Cheikh Anta Diop, The Pharoah of Knowledge|url=http://home3.inet.tele.dk/mcamara/antadiop.html|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613205716/http://home3.inet.tele.dk/mcamara/antadiop.html|archive-date=13 June 2007}}</ref> author: ''The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality''; ''Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology''; ''Precolonial Black Africa''; ''The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity''; ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script''
* ], author: ''African Origins of Major "Western Religions"''; ''Black Man of the Nile and His Family''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''New Dimensions in African History''; ''The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins''; ''Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual''
* ], Harvard professor, linguist, author: ''Saga America'', 1980
* {{Cite book |last = Jones
* ], medical doctor and author: ''Echoes of the Old Darkland: Themes from the African Eden'' (1991), ''Africa and the Birth of Science and Technology'' (1991), ''The Star of Deep Beginnings'' (1998), ''Biblio Africana: An Annotated Reader's Guide to African Cultural History and Related Subjects'' (1999), ''The African Background to Medical Science: Essays on African History, Science & Civilizations'' (2000), ''The Afrikan Origins of the Major World Religions'' (with Yosef Ben-Jochannan and Modupe Oduyoye) (1987)
|first = Gayl
* ], lecturer, syndicated columnist, author: ''Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire'', 1926.
|author-link = Gayl Jones
* ], author: ''African Origins of Major "Western Religions"''; ''Black Man of the Nile and His Family''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''New Dimensions in African History''; ''The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual''
|title = The Healing
* ] , author: ''Introduction to African Civilizations''; ''The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific''
|publisher = Beacon Press
* ], author: ''Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands : The Old World''; ''Nature Knows No Color Line''; ''Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas : The New World''; ''100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro''
|year = 1998
* ], author: ''They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America'', '' ISBN 0887386644''; ''Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern''; ''African Presence in Early Asia''; ''African Presence in Early America''; ''Early America Revisited''; ''Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations''; ''Nile Valley Civilizations''; ''Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12)''; ''The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991)''; ''Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern''; ''Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop''
|location = Boston
|url = https://archive.org/details/healing00jone
|isbn = 978-0-8070-6314-9
}} The protagonist of this novel describes her ongoing daily experiences in the US using a consistently Afrocentric perspective.
* ],<ref>{{cite web|last1=Rashidi|first1=Runoko|author-link1=Runoko Rashidi|title=The Global African Presence|url=http://www.cwo.com/%7Elucumi/runoko.html|website=cwo.com|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120114134424/http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/runoko.html|archive-date=14 January 2012}}</ref> author: ''Introduction to African Civilizations''; ''The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific''
* ], author: ''Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands: The Old World''; ''Nature Knows No Color Line''; ''Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas: The New World''; ''100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro''
* ], author: ''They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America'', '' {{ISBN|0-88738-664-4}}''; ''Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern''; ''African Presence in Early Asia''; ''African Presence in Early America''; ''Early America Revisited''; ''Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations''; ''Nile Valley Civilizations''; ''Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12)''; ''The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991)''; ''Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern''; ''Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop''<ref>{{cite web|last1=Sertima|first1=Ivan Van|author-link1=Ivan Van Sertima|title=Journal of African Civilizations|url=http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/sertima.html|website=cwo.com|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060426084454/http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/sertima.html|archive-date=26 April 2006}}</ref>
* ], author: ''The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.'' * ], author: ''The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.''
* ], author: ''Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations''
* ], author: "Afridentity: Essays on Africa" Silver Spring: Africa Reads Books, 2007.
* ], author: ''Ancient Egypt and Black Africa : a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations''
* ], III, author: ''SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind''; ''The Teachings of Ptahhotep'' * ], III, author: ''SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind''; ''The Teachings of Ptahhotep''

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

==Bibliography==
* {{cite book |author=Asante, Molefi Kete|title=Kemet, Afrocentricity, and knowledge|publisher=Africa World Press|year=1990}}
* {{cite book |author=Bailey, Randall C. (editor)|title=Yet with a steady beat: contemporary U.S. Afrocentric biblical interpretation|publisher=Society of Biblical Literature|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Berlinerblau, Jacques|title=Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1999}}
* {{cite book |author=Binder, Amy J.|title=Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools|publisher=|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Browder, Anthony T.|title=Nile Valley Contributions To Civilization: Exploding the Myths, Volume 1|location=Washington, DC | publisher=Institute of Karmic Guidance|year=1992}}
* {{cite book |author=Crawford, Clinton|title=Recasting Ancient Egypt In The African Context: Toward A Model Curriculum Using Art And Language|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, New Jersey|year=1996}}
* {{cite book |author=Henderson, Errol Anthony|title=Afrocentrism and world politics: towards a new paradigm|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Connecticut|year=1995}}
* {{cite book |author=Henke, Holger and Fred Reno (editors)|title=Modern political culture in the Caribbean|publisher=University of the West Indies Press|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Howe, Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: mythical pasts and imagined homes|publisher=Verso|location=London|year=1998}}
* {{cite book |author=Houston, Drusilla Dunjee|title=Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire|publisher=Universal Publishing Company|location=Oklahoma|year=1926}}
* {{cite journal|author=Kershaw, Terry|title="Afrocentrism and the Afrocentric method." ''Western Journal of Black Studies'' |year=1992 | volume=16 | issue=3 | pages=160-168}}
* Konstan, David. "Inventing Ancient Greece: ", ''History and Theory'', Vol.&nbsp;36, No.&nbsp;2. (May, 1997), pp.&nbsp;261–269.
* {{cite book |author=Lefkowitz, Mary R.|title=Not out of Africa: how Afrocentrism became an excuse to teach myth as history|publisher=BasicBooks|location=New York|year=1996}}
* {{cite book |author=Lefkowitz, Mary R. and Guy MacLean Rogers (editors)|title=Black Athena Revisited|publisher=University of North Carolina Press|year=1996}}
* {{cite book |author=Lewis, Martin W.|title=The myth of continents: a critique of metageography|publisher=University of California Press|year=1997}}
* {{cite book |author=Magida, Arthur J.|title=Prophet of rage a life of Louis Farrakhan and his nation|publisher=BasicBooks|location=New York|year=1996}}
* Morton, Eric. ." ''Journal on African Philosophy''. (2002) ISSN: 1533-1067. Africa Resource Center. Retrieved on ].
* {{cite book |author=Moses, Wilson Jeremiah|title=Afrotopia: the roots of African American popular history|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1998}}
* {{cite book |author=Sniderman, Paul M. and Thomas Piazza|title=Black pride and black prejudice|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Spivey, Donald|title=Fire from the soul: a history of the African-American struggle|publisher=Carolina Academic Press|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Walker, Clarence E.|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000}}
* {{cite book |author=Wells, Spencer|title=The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* Osei-Yaw, Emmanuel. D.(2006)
* {{cite book|last=Ani|first=Marimba|title=Yurugu: An African-centered Critique of European Thought and Behavior|year=1994|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|id=ISBN 0-86543-248-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|authorlink=Molefi Kete Asante|title=Afrocentricity|year=1988|edition=rev. ed.|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|id=ISBN 0-86543-067-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=Kemet, Afrocentricity, and Knowledge|year=1990|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|id=ISBN 0-86543-188-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=The Afrocentric Idea|year=1998|publisher=Temple University Press|location=Philadelphia|id=ISBN 1-56639-594-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Karenga|first=Maulana|authorlink=Ron Karenga|title=Introduction to Black Studies|year=1993|edition=2nd ed.|publisher=University of Sankore Press|location=Los Angeles|id=ISBN 0-943412-16-1}}


==See also== ==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
{{div col end}}


==External links== ==References==
{{reflist}}
*
* by ], '']''
*
*
*
* by T. A. Schmitz (])
*
*
*
*
*


==Literature==
;Afrocentric websites
*
*
*
*


===Primary===
* {{cite book|last=Ani|first=Marimba|title=Yurugu: An African-centered Critique of European Thought and Behavior|year=1994|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-248-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|author-link=Molefi Kete Asante|title=Afrocentricity|year=1988|edition=rev.|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-067-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=Kemet, Afrocentricity, and Knowledge|year=1990|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-188-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=The Afrocentric Idea|year=1998|publisher=Temple University Press|location=Philadelphia|isbn=1-56639-594-1|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentricidea00asan}}
*Asante, Molefi Kete (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press. {{ISBN|978-07456-4102-7}}
* {{cite book|last=Karenga|first=Maulana|author-link=Ron Karenga|title=Introduction to Black Studies|year=1993|edition=2nd|publisher=University of Sankore Press|location=Los Angeles|isbn=0-943412-16-1|url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontobl00kare}}
* {{cite journal|author=Kershaw, Terry|title="Afrocentrism and the Afrocentric method." ''Western Journal of Black Studies'' |year=1992 |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=160–168}}

===Secondary===
* Adeleke, Tunde. (2009). The Case Against Afrocentrism. University Press of Mississippi. {{ISBN|978-1-60473-293-1}}
*{{cite book |editor=Bailey, Randall C.|title=Yet With a Steady Beat: Contemporary U.S. Afrocentric Biblical Interpretation|publisher=Society of Biblical Literature|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Berlinerblau, Jacques|title=Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals|url=https://archive.org/details/heresyinuniversi00berl|url-access=registration|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1999}}
* {{cite book |author=Binder, Amy J.|title=Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Browder, Anthony T.|title=Nile Valley Contributions To Civilization: Exploding the Myths, Volume 1|location=Washington, DC |publisher=Institute of Karmic Guidance|year=1992}}
* {{cite book |author=Henderson, Errol Anthony|title=Afrocentrism and World Politics: towards a new paradigm|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Connecticut|year=1995}}
* {{cite book |editor1=Henke, Holger |editor2=Reno, Fred|title=Modern political culture in the Caribbean|publisher=University of the West Indies Press|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Howe, Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: mythical pasts and imagined homes|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentrism00step|url-access=registration|publisher=Verso|location=London|year=1998|isbn=9781859848739 }}
* Konstan, David. "Inventing Ancient Greece: ", ''History and Theory'', Vol.&nbsp;36, No.&nbsp;2. (May 1997), pp.&nbsp;261–269.
*{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=History Lesson: A Race Odyssey |author-link=Mary Lefkowitz |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1996 |isbn=0-300-12659-X}}
*{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History |year=1996 |publisher=Basic Books |location=New York |isbn=0-465-09837-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/notoutofafricaho00lefk_1 }}
* {{cite book |editor1=Lefkowitz, Mary R. |editor2=Guy MacLean Rogers|title=Black Athena Revisited|url=https://archive.org/details/blackathenarevis00lefk_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=University of North Carolina Press|year=1996|isbn=0-8078-4555-8}}
* {{cite book |author=Moses, Wilson Jeremiah|author-link=Wilson Jeremiah Moses|title=Afrotopia: the roots of African American popular history|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1998}}
* {{cite book |author1=Sniderman, Paul M.|author2=Piazza, Thomas|title=Black Pride and Black Prejudice|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Walker, Clarence E.|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000|isbn=0-19-509571-5}}

==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123082650/http://www.asante.net/articles/1/afrocentricity/ |date=23 November 2018 }} by ], asante.net
* ] comments on the emergence of Afrocentric thought in the African American community.
*
*{{in lang|fr}}
{{Pan-Africanism}} {{Pan-Africanism}}
{{Influential geocultural perspectives of history & geography}}

{{Authority control}}

]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 00:25, 22 December 2024

African ethnocentrism

For the study of African culture and history, see African studies. For the academic theory, see Afrocentricity. For the book, see Afrocentricity (book).

Part of the Politics series on
Pan-Africanism
Pan-African flag
Arts
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Dynamics
Related
This article is part of a series about
Black power
History
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Works
Related

Afrocentrism is a worldview that is centered on the history of people of African descent or a view that favors it over non-African civilizations. It is in some respects a response to Eurocentric attitudes about African people and their historical contributions. It seeks to counter what it sees as mistakes and ideas perpetuated by the racist philosophical underpinnings of Western academic disciplines as they developed during and since Europe's Early Renaissance as justifying rationales for the enslavement of other peoples, in order to enable more accurate accounts of not only African but all people's contributions to world history. Afrocentricity deals primarily with self-determination and African agency and is a pan-African point of view for the study of culture, philosophy, and history.

Afrocentrism is a scholarly movement that seeks to conduct research and education on global history subjects, from the perspective of historical African peoples and polities. It takes a critical stance on Eurocentric assumptions and myths about world history, in order to pursue methodological studies of the latter. Some of the critics of the movement believe that it often denies or minimizes European, Near Eastern, and Asian cultural influences while exaggerating certain aspects of historical African civilizations that independently accomplished a significant level of cultural and technological development. In general, Afrocentrism is usually manifested in a focus on the history of Africa and its role in contemporary African-American culture among others.

What is today broadly called Afrocentrism evolved out of the work of African American intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but flowered into its modern form due to the activism of African American intellectuals in the U.S. civil rights movement and in the development of African American studies programs in universities. However, following the development of universities in African colonies in the 1950s, African scholars became major contributors to African historiography. A notable pioneer is the professor Kenneth Dike, who became chairman of the Committee on African Studies at Harvard in the 1970s. In strict terms Afrocentrism, as a distinct historiography, reached its peak in the 1980s and 1990s. Today it is primarily associated with Cheikh Anta Diop, John Henrik Clarke, Ivan van Sertima and Molefi Kete Asante. Asante, however, describes his theories as Afrocentricity.

Proponents of Afrocentrism support the claim that the contributions of various Black African people have been downplayed or discredited as part of the legacy of colonialism and slavery's pathology of "writing Africans out of history".

Major critics of Afrocentrism include Mary Lefkowitz, who dismiss it as pseudohistory, reactive, and obstinately therapeutic. Others, such as Kwame Anthony Appiah, believe that Afrocentrism defeats its purpose of dismantling unipolar studies of world history by seeking to replace Eurocentricity with an equally ethnocentric and hierarchical curriculum, and negatively essentializes European culture and people of European descent. Clarence E. Walker claims it to be "Eurocentrism in blackface".

Terminology

The term "Afrocentrism" dates to 1962. The adjective "Afrocentric" appears in a typescript proposal for an entry in Encyclopedia Africana, possibly due to W. E. B. Du Bois. The abstract noun "Afrocentricity" dates to the 1970s, and was popularized by Molefi Asante's Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change (1980). Molefi Kete Asante's theory, Afrocentricity, has been one developed in academic settings and may incorporate the terms Afrocentric to describe scholarship and Afrocentrists to describe scholars, but does not use Afrocentrism. According to Asante, though the two terms are often confused to mean the same, Afrocentrists are not adherents of Afrocentrism. This has caused confusing notions about who is considered an Afrocentrist, as various scholars who may or may not be associated with Asante and his works have been erroneously given the title, even by other academics. Asante has written that Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism are not the same and neither do they share the same origin:

By way of distinction, Afrocentricity should not be confused with the variant Afrocentrism. The term “Afrocentrism” was first used by the opponents of Afrocentricity who in their zeal saw it as an obverse of Eurocentrism. The adjective “Afrocentric” in the academic literature always referred to “Afrocentricity.” However, the use of “Afrocentrism” reflected a negation of the idea of Afrocentricity as a positive and progressive paradigm. The aim was to assign religious signification to the idea of African centeredness. However, it has come to refer to a broad cultural movement of the late twentieth century that has a set of philosophical, political, and artistic ideas which provides the basis for the musical, sartorial, and aesthetic dimensions of the African personality. On the other hand, Afrocentricity, as I have previously defined it, is a theory of agency, that is, the idea that African people must be viewed and view themselves as agents rather than spectators to historical revolution and change. To this end Afrocentricity seeks to examine every aspect of the subject place of Africans in historical, literary, architectural, ethical, philosophical, economic, and political life.

History

A 1911 copy of the NAACP journal The Crisis depicting "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile", a copy of the relief portraying Nebmaatre I on Meroe pyramid 17.

Afrocentrism has its origins in the work of African and African diaspora intellectuals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, following social changes in the United States and Africa due both to the end of slavery and the decline of colonialism. Following the American Civil War, African Americans in the South gathered together in communities to evade white control, established their own church congregations, and worked hard to gain education. They increasingly took more active public roles despite severe racial discrimination and segregation. American and African intellectuals looked to the African past for a re-evaluation of what its civilizations had achieved and what they meant for contemporary people.

The combination of the European centuries gives us about four to five hundred years of solid European domination of intellectual concepts and philosophical ideas. Africa and Asia were subsumed under various headings of the European hierarchy. If a war between the European powers occurred it was called a World War and the Asians and Africans found their way on the side of one European power or the other. There was this sense of assertiveness about European culture that advanced with Europe's trade, religious, and military forces.

— Molefi Asante, "De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths"

As an ideology and political movement, Afrocentrism had its beginnings in activism among black intellectuals, political figures, and historians in the context of the US American civil rights movement. According to U.S. professor Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, concepts of Afrocentricity lie at the core of disciplines such as African American studies. But Wilson J. Moses claims that Afrocentrism roots are not exclusively African:

Despite the fulminations of ethno-chauvinists and other prejudiced persons, it remains a fact that the contributions of white scholars, like Boas, Malinowski, and Herskovits, were fundamental to that complex of ideas that we designate to days as Afrocentrism...Students of African and African American history have long appreciated the irony that much of what we now call Afrocentrism was developed during the 1930s by the Jewish American scholar Melville Herskovits

— Wilson J. Moses, Historical Sketches of Afrocentrism

In 1987, Martin Bernal published his Black Athena, in which he claims that ancient Greece was colonized by northern invaders mixing with a colony established by Phoenicia (modern Lebanon). A major theme of the work is the alleged denial by Western academia of the African and (western) Asiatic influence on ancient Greek culture.

Aspects of Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism

Afrocentricity book

Main article: Afrocentricity (book)

In 2000, African American Studies professor Molefi Kete Asante, gave a lecture entitled "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium," in which he presented many of his ideas:

  • Africa has been betrayed by international commerce, by missionaries and imams, by the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world, by its own leaders, and by the ignorance of its own people of its past.
  • Philosophy originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.
  • Afrocentricity constitutes a new way of examining data, and a novel orientation to data; it carries with it assumptions about the current state of the African world.
  • His aim is "to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership."
  • Afrocentricity can stand its ground among any ideology or religion: Marxism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, or Judaism. Your Afrocentricity will emerge in the presence of these other ideologies because it is from you.
  • Afrocentrism is the only ideology that can liberate African people.

Asante also stated:

As a cultural configuration, the Afrocentric idea is distinguished by five characteristics:

  1. an intense interest in psychological location as determined by symbols, motifs, rituals, and signs.
  2. a commitment to finding the subject-place of Africans in any social, political, economic, or religious phenomenon with implications for questions of sex, gender, and class.
  3. a defence of African cultural elements as historically valid in the context of art, music, and literature.
  4. a celebration of centeredness and agency and a commitment to lexical refinement that eliminates pejoratives about Africans or other people.
  5. a powerful imperative from historical sources to revise the collective text of African people.

However, Wilson J. Moses, said of Asante: "His second book, The Afrocentric Idea (1987), was a creative and in some respects brilliant but rambling theoretical work, much influenced by the revolution in "critical theory" that occurred in American intellectual life during the late 1970s and early 1980s." Some also assert that the definition of Afrocentricity has never sat still long enough to be properly described and accurately critiqued.

Afrocentric education

Main article: Afrocentric education

Afrocentric education is education designed to empower peoples of the African diaspora. A central premise behind it is that many Africans have been subjugated by limiting their awareness of themselves and indoctrinating them with ideas that work against them. To control a people's culture is to control their tools of self-determination in relationship to others. Like educational leaders of other cultures, proponents assert that what educates one group of people does not necessarily educate and empower another group–so they assert educational priorities distinctly for the Africans in a given context.

Afrocentric theology

Further information: Black theology and Black church

The black church in the United States developed out of the creolization of African spirituality and European-American Christianity; early members of the churches made certain stories their own. During the antebellum years, the idea of deliverance out of slavery, as in the story of Exodus, was especially important. After Reconstruction and the restoration of white supremacy, their hope was based on deliverance from segregation and other abuses. They found much to respond to in the idea of a personal relationship with Jesus, and shaped their churches by the growth of music and worship styles that related to African as well as European-American traditions.

Twentieth-century "Africentric approaches" to Christian theology and preaching have been more deliberate. Writers and thinkers emphasize "Black presence" in the Christian Bible, including the idea of a "Black Jesus".

Kwanzaa

In 1966 Maulana Karenga of the black separatist US Organization created Kwanzaa; which became the first specifically African American holiday to be widely observed amongst African Americans. Karenga rejected liberation theology and considered the practice of Christianity anti-thetical to the creation of an African-American identity independent from white America. Karenga said his goal was to "give Blacks an alternative to the existing holiday and give Blacks an opportunity to celebrate themselves and history, rather than simply imitate the practice of the dominant society."

Race and Pan-African identity

Further information: Ancient Egyptian race controversy and Pan-Africanism

Many Afrocentrists seek to challenge concepts such as white privilege, color-blind perspectives, and race-neutral pedagogies. There are strong ties between Afrocentricity and Critical race theory.

Afrocentrists agree with the current scientific consensus that holds that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite work by Hiernaux and Hassan that they believe demonstrates that populations could vary based on micro-evolutionary principles (climate adaptation, drift, selection), and that such variations existed in both living and fossil Africans.

Afrocentrists have condemned what they consider to be attempts at dividing African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of discredited theories, such as the Hamitic hypothesis and the Dynastic Race Theory. These theories, they contend, attempted to identify certain African ethnicities, such as Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalis, as "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They believe that Western academics have traditionally limited the peoples they defined as "Black" Africans to those south of the Sahara, but used broader "Caucasoid" or related categories to classify peoples of Egypt or North Africa. Afrocentrists also believe strongly in the work of certain anthropologists who have suggested that there is little evidence to support that the first North African populations were closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.

In 1964 Afrocentric scholar Cheikh Anta Diop expressed a belief in such a double standard:

But it is only the most gratuitous theory that considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular—the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude that maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race.

French historian Jean Vercoutter has claimed that archaeological workers routinely classified Negroid remains as Mediterranean, even though they found such remains in substantial numbers with ancient artefacts.

Some Afrocentrists have adopted a pan-Africanist perspective that people of color are all "African people" or "diasporic Africans," citing physical characteristics they exhibit in common with Black Africans. Afrocentric scholar Runoko Rashidi writes that they are all part of the "global African community." Some Afrocentric writers include in the African diaspora the Dravidians of India, "Negritos" of Southeast Asia (Thailand, the Philippines and Malaysia); and the aboriginal peoples of Australia and Melanesia.

Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas theories

Main article: Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories

In the 1970s, Ivan van Sertima advanced the theory that the complex civilizations of the Americas were the result of trans-oceanic influence from the Egyptians or other African civilizations. Such a claim is his primary thesis in They Came Before Columbus, published in 1978. The few hyper-diffusionist writers seek to establish that the Olmec people, who built the first highly complex civilization in Mesoamerica and are considered by some to be the mother civilization for all other civilizations of Mesoamerica, were deeply influenced by Africans. Van Sertima said that the Olmec civilization was a hybrid one of Africans and Native Americans. His theory of pre-Columbian American-African contact has since met with considerable and detailed opposition by scholars of Mesoamerica. Van Sertima has been accused of "doctoring" and twisting data to fit his conclusions, inventing evidence, and ignoring the work of respected Central and South American scholars to advance his own theory. Mainstream historians of Mesoamerica overwhelmingly reject that view with detailed rebuttals.

Claims have been also forwarded contending that African civilizations were founding influences on the Chinese Xia cultures.

Afrocentrism and Ancient Egypt

Main article: Ancient Egyptian race controversy

Several Afrocentrists have claimed that important cultural characteristics of ancient Egypt were indigenous to Africa and that these features were present in other early African civilizations such as the later Kerma and the Meroitic civilizations of Nubia. Scholars who have held this view include Marcus Garvey, George James, Martin Bernal, Ivan van Sertima, John Henrik Clarke, and Molefi Kete Asante as well as the Afrocentrist writers Cheikh Anta Diop and Chancellor Williams. The claim has also been made by many Afrocentric scholars that the Ancient Egyptians themselves were Black African (sub-saharan African) rather than North African/Maghrebi, and that the various invasions on Egypt resulted in the "Africanity" of Ancient Egypt becoming diluted, resulting in the modern diversity seen today. Examining this view, Egyptologist Stuart Tyson Smith, wrote that "Any characterization of race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not on scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterise the Egyptians as 'black', while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans". Smith, however, expressed criticism of Egyptologists and Afrocentrists that defined ancient Egyptians "as members of an essentialist racial category" with perceived "Caucasoid" or "Negroid/Africoid" phenotypes".

As historian Ronald H. Fritze argued, mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology, viewing it as "theurapetic mythology" for black people, since it fails to provide sufficient evidence or persuasive interpretations to back up its claims.

Stephen Howe, professor in the history and cultures of colonialism at Bristol University, writes that contrary to "Afrocentric speculation, depending on undocumented assertions that the relatively light-skinned people of the lower Nile today descend from Arab conquerors rather than earlier residents". Howe also cited a 1995 publication which stated "the latest major synthetic work on African populations is firmly of the opinion that "It was not the Arabs physically displaced Egyptians. Instead the Egyptians were transformed by relatively small number of immigrants bringing in new ideas, which, when disseminated, created a wider ethnic identity".

S.O.Y. Keita, a biological anthropologist and research affilitate at the Smithsonian Institution who has been described as sympathetic to Afrocentrism, but defined his position as that "it is not a question of “African” “influence”; Ancient Egypt was organically African. Studying early Egypt in its African context is not “Afrocentric,” but simply correct". Keita has argued that the original inhabitants of the Nile Valley were primarily a variety of indigenous Northeast Africans from the areas of the desiccating Sahara and more southerly areas. He reviewed studies on the biological affinities of the Ancient Egyptian population and described the skeletal morphologies of early dynastic Egyptian remains as a "Saharo-tropical African variant". He also noted that over time gene flow from the Near East and Europe added more genetic variability to the region. In 2022, Keita argued that some genetic studies have a "default racialist or racist approach" and should be interpreted in a framework with other sources of evidence. Several other academics, including Christopher Ehret, Fekri Hassan, Bruce Williams, Frank Yurco, Molefi Kete Asante, Lanny Bell and A.J. Boyce across various disciplines have contended that Ancient Egypt was fundamentally an African civilization, with cultural and biological connections to Egypt's African neighbors.

Scholars have challenged the various assertions of Afrocentrists on the cultural and biological characteristics of Ancient Egyptian civilization and its people. At a UNESCO Symposium in the 1970s, some of the participants, including Jean Vercoutter, Serge Sauneron, Gunnar Säve-Söderbergh and Jean Leclant expressed "profound" disagreement with the "Black", homogeneous hypothesis. Despite contestations, UNESCO decided to include his "Origin of the ancient Egyptians" in the General History of Africa, with an editorial comment mentioning the disagreement. However, Diop's chapter was credited as a "painstakingly researched contribution" in the general conclusion of the symposium report by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur, Professor Jean Devisse, which nevertheless lead to a "real lack of balance" in the discussion among participants. The ancient world did not employ racial categories such as "Black" or "White" as they had no conception of "race", but rather labeled groups according to their land of origin and cultural traits. However, Keita studying the controversy, finds simplistic political appellations (in the negative or affirmative) describing ancient populations as "black" or "white" to be inaccurate and instead focuses on the ancestry of ancient Egypt as being a part of the native and diverse biological variation of Africa, which includes a variety of phenotypes and skin gradients.

Egyptian Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has gone on record as saying that the Ancient Egyptians were not black and “We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist Flinders Petrie at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in Africa, it occurred only here”. In 2022, Hawass reiterated his view that "Africans have nothing to do with the pyramids scientifically" and stated that Africans "ruled in Egypt in the late Era, at the time of the 25th dynasty". Hawass also accused some international figures of African descent that promoted Afrocentrism of racism and fabrication of Egyptian history.

In 2008, Stuart Tyson Smith expressed criticism of a facial reconstruction of Tutankhamun as "very light-skinned" which reflected "bias" and "predictably and justifiably, it has provoked protests from Afrocentrists" as "Egyptologists have been strangely reluctant to admit that the ancient Egyptians were rather dark-skinned Africans, especially the farther south one goes".

In 2011, Stephen Quirke, professor of Egyptian Archaeology and Philology argued that the UNESCO-sponsored conference on the General History of Africa in 1974 "did not change the Eurocentric climate of research" and of the need to incorporate both African-centred studies and White European, academic perspectives. He later outlined that "research conferences and publications on the history and language of Kemet remain dominated ... by those brought up and trained in European, not African societies and languages (which include Arabic)".

African-American Afrocentric "hoteps" and the far-right

Main article: Hoteps

African-Americans who use the Black Egyptian hypothesis as a source of black pride have been called "the hoteps" (after the Egyptian word hotep). The term has often been used disparagingly by non-hotep African-Americans, some of whom have linked the ideology of the hotep community – which is anti-feminist, anti-gay and anti-Semitic – to the far-right. Hoteps have been described as promoting false histories and misinformation about black people and black history. Some have argued hotep beliefs are too narrow-minded (focusing only on Egypt as opposed to other aspects of African history), and black feminists argue that hoteps perpetuate rape culture by policing women's sexuality and not criticizing predatory black men.

Alkebulan

Among Afrocentrists the name 'Alkebulan' (also spelled 'Al Kebulan' or 'Alkebu Lan') is sometimes used a replacement for 'Africa.' Users often erroneously claim that it derives from the Arabic for 'Land of the Blacks' (in reality Bilad as-Sudan), or alternatively that it comes from one or more indigenous African languages and means 'Garden of Life' or 'Motherland'. The earliest record of the term 'Alkebulan' is the introduction to an 1813 Spanish poem celebrating the defenders of Zaragoza, in which the author claimed an Arabic origin of the term. In the 20th century it was popularized by Yosef Ben-Jochannan, though this is sometimes incorrectly credited to Cheikh Anta Diop in a non-existent book called “The Kemetic History of Afrika”.

Reception

Afrocentrism has encountered opposition from mainstream scholars who charge it with historical inaccuracy, scholarly ineptitude, and racism.

Yaacov Shavit, a critic of the movement, summarises its goals in the preface to his book History in Black, in which he states:

Thus, if historical myths and legends, or an invented history, play such a major role in the founding of every national reconstruction, the question that should concern us here is the nature of the distinct style in which black Americans imagine their past. The answer to this question is that radical Afrocentrism, the subject of this study, which plays a central role in shaping the modern historical world-view of a large section of the African-American (or Afro-American) community, is far more than an effort to follow the line taken by many ethnic groups and nations in modern rewriting, inventing or developing collective identity and national history. Rather, it is a large-scale historical project to rewrite the history of the whole of humankind from an Afrocentric point of view. The result is a new reconstruction of world history: it is a universal history.

Other critics, such as Mary Lefkowitz, contend that the Afrocentric historical approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. She argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and myth rather than sound scholarship. In The Skeptic's Dictionary, philosophy professor Robert Todd Carroll labeled Afrocentrism "pseudohistorical". He argued that Afrocentrism's prime goal was to encourage black nationalism and ethnic pride in order to effectively combat the destructive consequences of cultural and universal racism. Professor of history Clarence E. Walker has described Afrocentrism as "a mythology that is racist, reactionary, essentially therapeutic and is eurocentrism in black face."

Classicist Mary Lefkowitz rejects George James's theories about Egyptian contributions to Greek civilization as being faulty scholarship. She writes that ancient Egyptian texts show little similarity to Greek philosophy. Lefkowitz states that Aristotle could not have stolen his ideas from the great Library at Alexandria as James suggested, because the library was founded after Aristotle's death. On the basis of such errors, Lefkowitz calls Afrocentrism "an excuse to teach myth as history." Mary Lefkowitz in 1997 whilst criticising elements of Afrocentrism had acknowledged that the origins of the ancient Egyptians were more clear due to the "recent evidence on skeletons and DNA suggests that the people who settled in the Nile valley, like all of humankind, came from somewhere south of the Sahara; they were not (as some nineteenth-century scholars had supposed) invaders from the North".

In 2002, Ibrahim Sundiata wrote in the American Historical Review that:

The word "Afrocentric" has been traced by Derrick Alridge to the American historian W.E.B. Du Bois, who employed it in the early 1960s. During the 1970s, Molefi Kete Asante appropriated the term, insisting that he was the only person equipped to define it, and asserting that even the holy archangels Du Bois and Cheikh Anta Diop had an imperfect and immature grasp of a concept that finds ultimate expression in his own pontifications. Subsequently, it became a catchall "floating signifier," nebulous, unstable, and infinitely mutable.

Literature and languages scholar Cain Hope Felder, a supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls, including:

  • Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.
  • Adopting multiculturalism as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world.
  • Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.

Nathan Glazer writes that although Afrocentricity can mean many things, the popular press has generally given most attention to its most outlandish theories. Glazer agrees with many of the findings and conclusions presented in Lefkowitz's book Not Out of Africa. Yet he also argues that Afrocentrism often presents legitimate and relevant scholarship. The late Manning Marable was also a critic of Afrocentrism. He wrote:

Populist Afrocentrism was the perfect social theory for the upwardly mobile black petty bourgeoisie. It gave them a sense of ethnic superiority and cultural originality, without requiring the hard, critical study of historical realities. It provided a philosophical blueprint to avoid concrete struggle within the real world.... It was, in short, only the latest theoretical construct of a politics of racial identity, a world-view designed to discuss the world but never really to change it.

Some Afrocentrists agree in rejecting those works which critics have characterized as examples of bad scholarship. Adisa A. Alkebulan states that the work of Afrocentric scholars is not fully appreciated because critics use the claims of "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."

In 1996, the historian August Meier critically reviewed the new work of Mary Lefkowitz on Afrocentrism as "Eurocentric". He criticized her book Not out of Africa: How Afrocentrism became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History for what he saw as her neglect of the African-American historic literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Meier believes she fails to take the African-American experiences into account, to the extent that she "fails to answer the question raised in this book's subtitle".

Maghan Keita describes the controversy over Afrocentrism as a cultural war. He believes certain "epistemologies" are warring with each other: the "epistemology of blackness" argues for the "responsibilities and potential of black peoples to function in and contribute to the progress of civilization."

List of prominent authors

  • Marimba Ani, professor, author and activist: Yurugu: An Afrikan-centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior (Trenton: Africa World Press, 1994).
  • Molefi Kete Asante, professor, author: Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change; The Afrocentric Idea; The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten
  • Jacob Carruthers, Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, Chicago
  • Cheikh Anta Diop, author: The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality; Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology; Precolonial Black Africa; The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity; The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script
  • Yosef Ben-Jochannan, author: African Origins of Major "Western Religions"; Black Man of the Nile and His Family; Africa: Mother of Western Civilization; New Dimensions in African History; The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins; Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual
  • Jones, Gayl (1998). The Healing. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-6314-9. The protagonist of this novel describes her ongoing daily experiences in the US using a consistently Afrocentric perspective.
  • Runoko Rashidi, author: Introduction to African Civilizations; The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific
  • J.A. Rogers, author: Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands: The Old World; Nature Knows No Color Line; Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas: The New World; 100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro
  • Ivan van Sertima, author: They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America, African Presence in Early Europe ISBN 0-88738-664-4; Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern; African Presence in Early Asia; African Presence in Early America; Early America Revisited; Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations; Nile Valley Civilizations; Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12); The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991); Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern; Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop
  • Chancellor Williams, author: The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.
  • Théophile Obenga, author: Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations
  • Asa Hilliard, III, author: SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind; The Teachings of Ptahhotep

See also

References

  1. "Recent" here means in the last few thousand years, as opposed to in the Stone Age, for example 70,000 years ago
  2. CC Verharen, "Molefi Asante...”, The Western Journal of Black Studies, (24)4, 2000, pp. 223–238
  3. Asante on Afrocentricity Archived 23 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine.
  4. Gates, Henry Louis, and Kwame Anthony Appiah (eds), Africana: The Encyclopedia of the African and African-American Volume 1, p. 111, Oxford University Press. 2005. ISBN 0-19-517055-5
  5. General History of Africa, Vol 1, p41, UNESCO, 1981
  6. "Kenneth O. Dike Dies in a Nigerian Hospital". The New York Times. 13 November 1983.
  7. Molefi Asante, The Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics, foreword by Maulana Karenga: "Molefi Asante, the founding and preeminent theorist of Afrocentricity, is one of the most important intellectuals at work today. This work continues his tradition of combining an extraordinary intellectual range with an impressive ability to identify and clarify central issues in the current discourse on Afrocentricity, multiculturalism, race, culture, ethnicity and related themes. Dr. Asante offers an insightful and valuable response to Eurocentric critics of the Afrocentric initiative while simultaneously addressing a wide range of issues critical to understanding this important intellectual enterprise, including African agency, location, orientation, centerdness, subject-place and cultural groundedness. The volume is thoughtful, multifaceted and rewarding, and yields a rich sense of the contours and complexity of the Afrocentric project." --Dr. Maulana Karenga, Chair, Department of Black Studies, California State University, Long Beach."
  8. Andrade, Susan Z. (1990). "Rewriting History, Motherhood, and Rebellion: Naming an African Women's Literary Tradition". Research in African Literatures. 21 (1): 91–110. JSTOR 3819303.
  9. Woodson, Carter Godwin (1933). The Mis-education of the Negro. ReadaClassic.com. p. 7. GGKEY:LYULWKX4YJQ.
  10. Howe, Stephen (1998). Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. Verso Books. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-85984-228-7.
  11. Bracey, Earnest N. (1 January 1999). Prophetic Insight: The Higher Education and Pedagogy of African Americans. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7618-1384-2.
  12. ^ Marable, Manning (1995). Beyond Black and White: Transforming African-American Politics. Verso Books. p. 192. ISBN 978-1-85984-924-8.
  13. ^ Banner-haley, C.P.; Walker, Clarence E. (2003). "We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism". Journal of Southern History. 69 (3): 663–665. doi:10.2307/30040016. JSTOR 30040016. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  14. Moses, Wilson Jeremiah (13 September 1998). Afrotopia: The Roots of African American Popular History. Cambridge University Press. pp. 44–. ISBN 978-0-521-47941-7.
  15. Levine, Robert (2008). "Elegant Inconsistencies: Race, Nation, and Writing in Wilson Jeremiah Moses's Afrotopia". American Literary History. 20 (3): 497. doi:10.1093/alh/ajn016. S2CID 143005947.
  16. Thairu, Kihumbu (1975). The African Civilization. East African Literature Bureau.
  17. ^ Asante, Molefi K. (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-07456-4102-7.
  18. Asante, Molefi K. (1998). The Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. pp. ix–xiii. ISBN 1-56639-595-X.
  19. Asante, Molefi K. (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-07456-4102-7.
  20. Du Bois, W. E. B., Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935; reprint New York: The Free Press, 1998.
  21. "Reconstruction". Accessed 19 November 2007. Archived 2009-10-31.
  22. Moses, Greg. "Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English". National Association for African American Studies. Archived from the original on 12 December 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  23. De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths.
  24. Olaniyan, T. (2006). "From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History of an African And African American Discursivepractice)". West Africa Review. ISSN 1525-4488.
  25. Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, "The Place of Africalogy in the University Curriculum", Journal of Black Studies, vol. 26 no. 6, July 1999, pp. 688–712.
  26. Kete Asante, Molefi, "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium", University of Liverpool, 2 August 2000, accessed 11 February 2009 Archived 2 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
  27. Woodson, Dr. Carter G. (1933). The Mis-Education of the Negro. Khalifah's Booksellers & Associates.
  28. Akbar, Dr. Na'im (1998).
  29. Peters, Ronald Edward (ed.), Africentric Approaches to Christian Ministry: Strengthening Urban Congregations in African American Communities, University Press of America (2006), ISBN 978-0-7618-3264-5.
  30. Jaynes, Gerald D., ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of African American society. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. p. 420. ISBN 1452265410. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  31. Alexander, Ron (30 December 1983). "The Evening Hours". The New York Times". Retrieved 15 December 2006.
  32. Karenga, Maulana (1967). "Religion". In Clyde Halisi, James Mtume. The Quotable Karenga. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press. pp. 25. 23769.8.
  33. Mugane, John M. (15 July 2015). The Story of Swahili. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-89680-489-0.
  34. Leonardo, Zeus (2005). Critical Pedagogy and Race, p. 129 ISBN 1-4051-2968-9.
  35. ^ Hiernaux, J. (1974). The People of Africa. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  36. Hassan, F.A. (1988). "The Predynastic of Egypt". Journal of World Prehistory. 2 (2): 135–185. doi:10.1007/BF00975416. JSTOR 25800540. S2CID 153321928.
  37. Keita, S. (1992). "Further Studies of Crania From Ancient Northern Africa: An Analysis of Crania From First Dynasty Egyptian Tombs, Using Multiple Discriminant Functions". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 87 (3): 245–54. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330870302. PMID 1562056.
  38. Jean Vercoutter, The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script. Paris: UNESCO, 1978, pp. 15–36.
  39. ^ Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo; Gabriel Haslip Viera; Warren Barbour (1997). "They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s". Ethnohistory. 44 (2): 199–234. doi:10.2307/483368. JSTOR 483368.
  40. Sherwin, Elisabeth. "Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism". Davis Community Network. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  41. Diop, C.A. (1964). "Evolution of the Negro world'". 23 (51): 5–15. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  42. Bruce Williams, "The lost pharaohs of Nubia", in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), Egypt Revisited (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).
  43. Van Sertima, Ivan (1994). Egypt, Child of Africa. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1-56000-792-3.
  44. Smith, Stuart Tyson (2001). Redford, Donald (ed.). The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford University Press. pp. 27–28.
  45. Fritze, Ronald H. (4 February 2021). Egyptomania: A History of Fascination, Obsession and Fantasy. Reaktion Books. p. 333. ISBN 978-1-78023-685-8. Mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology. It is viewed as a 'therapeutic mythology' that is not based on convincing evidence or persuasive interpretations.
  46. "Author Page". openDemocracy. 23 June 2012. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  47. Howe, Stephen (1998). Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. Verso. p. 137. ISBN 9781859848739.
  48. Cornell University Courses of Study. Cornell University. 1996. p. 423. We shall then read from the works of "Afrocentrist" writers of history including Chancellor Williams, Yosef ben Yochanen and Chiekh Anta Diop as well as those of sympathetic scholars such as St. Clair Drake and Shomarka Keita.
  49. Kamugisha, Aaron (July 2003). "Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko". Race & Class. 45 (1): 31–60. doi:10.1177/0306396803045001002. ISSN 0306-3968. S2CID 145514370.
  50. "Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko". SEYFETTİN. 16 January 2007.
  51. Keita, S. O. Y. (1993). "Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships". History in Africa. 20: 129–154. doi:10.2307/3171969. ISSN 0361-5413. JSTOR 3171969. S2CID 162330365.
  52. Keita Shomarka. (2022). "Ancient Egyptian "Origins and "Identity" In Ancient Egyptian society : challenging assumptions, exploring approaches. Abingdon, Oxon. pp. 124–135. ISBN 978-0367434632.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  53. Celenko, Theodore (1996). Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis, Ind.: Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 1–134. ISBN 0936260645.
  54. UNESCO, "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script; Proceedings", (Paris, 1978), pp. 3–134.
  55. Ancient civilizations of Africa (Abridged ed.). London : J. Currey. 1990. pp. 43–46. ISBN 0852550928.
  56. Mokhtar, Gamal (1990). Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Unesco International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa). Currey. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-85255-092-2.
  57. The peopling of ancient Egypt and the deciphering of Meroitic script : proceedings of the symposium held in Cairo from 28 January to 3 February 1974. Paris: Unesco. 1978. pp. 86, 93–94, 99. ISBN 92-3-101605-9.
  58. Agustà (2007). "Advancing Biocultural Perspectives: Optimism from a Workshop". Anthropology News. 48 (9): 19–20. doi:10.1525/an.2007.48.9.19.; see also "Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions About Human Variation", Frank L'Engle Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelago's, Current Anthropology. (2005); An Analysis of Crania From Tell-Duweir Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S. O. Y. Keita, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 75: 375–390 (1988); "Interpreting African Genetic Diversity, S. O. Y. Keita & Rick Kittles, African Archaeological Review, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999); "Race": Confusion About Zoological and Social Taxonomies, and Their Places in Science", S. O. Y. Keita, A. J. Boyce, Field Museum of Chicago Institute of Biological Anthropology, Oxford University, American Journal of Human Biology, 13: 569–575 (2001).
  59. Samil, Nehar (2021). "Claims that Ancient Egyptians were black untrue: Zahi Hawass". Daily News Egypt. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  60. "Egyptians Create Viral Hashtag Against Kevin Hart's Cairo Performance". 14 August 2024.
  61. Smith, Stuart Tyson (1 January 2008). "Review of From Slave to Pharaoh: The Black Experience of Ancient Egypt by Donald Redford". Near Eastern Archaeology 71:3.
  62. Egypt in its African context : proceedings of the conference held at the Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, 2–4 October 2009. Oxford: Archaeopress. 2011. pp. 7–9. ISBN 978-1407307602.
  63. ^ Lovett, Miranda (21 July 2020). "Reflecting on the Rise of the Hoteps". Sapiens. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  64. Young, Damon (5 March 2016). "Hotep, Explained". The Root. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  65. Sheffield, Matthew (23 April 2018). "Laura Ingraham meets the Afrocentric "alt-right" — and it's every bit as weird as it sounds". Salon. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  66. Bastién, Angelica Jade (17 October 2016). "'Insecure' Season 1, Episode 2: Failure to Change". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  67. Bowen, Sesali (8 May 2018). "What Dear White People Got Right About Hoteps". refinery29. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  68. Maku, Bright (6 February 2023). "Alkebulan: Understanding the origins behind Africa's original name". Skabash!. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  69. "The Ancient Name for Africa was "Alkebulan" meaning "Mother of Mankind"". The African History. 3 July 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  70. "Alkebulan: The Original Name Of Africa And How To Pronounce It". Africa Global Radio. 15 March 2022. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  71. Jacobs, Frank (11 November 2014). "Africa, uncolonized: a detailed look at an alternate continent". Big Think. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  72. Early, Gerald (17 May 2002). "Afrocentrism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 August 2022.
  73. Yaacov Shavit, History in Black: African-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past, Frank Cass Publishers, 2001, pp. vii.
  74. ^ Stearns, Peter N. (2008). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World: 1750 to the Present. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-19-517632-2. Opponents of Afrocentrism claim that this approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. Mary Lefkowitz, in Not Out of Africa, argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and not in sound scholarship.
  75. ^ *Afrocentrism by Robert Todd Carroll, Skeptic's Dictionary.
  76. Robert Todd Carroll (2003), The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-27242-6 (paperback). p. 148
  77. Lefkowitz 1996, pp. 125–126, 137–141
  78. Lefkowitz, Mary R. (1996). Not out of Africa : how Afrocentrism became an excuse to teach myth as history. New York. p. 242. ISBN 046509838X.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  79. Ibrahim Sundiata, "The Argument We Are Really Having", American Historical Review, (1996).
  80. ^ Hope Felder, Cain (1994). "Afrocentrism, the Bible, and the Politics of Difference". The Princeton Seminary Bulletin. XV (2).
  81. ^ Nathan Glazer, We Are All Multiculturalists Now, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 ISBN 0-674-94836-X.
  82. Adisa A. Alkebulan, "Defending the Paradigm", Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 410–427 (2007).
  83. Meier, August, "Review: Mary Lefkowitz, Not out of Africa: How Afrocentrism became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History", Journal of American History, December 1996.
  84. Maghan Keita, Race and the Writing of History: Riddling the Sphinx, p. 7.
  85. Africawithin.com.
  86. Clarke, John Henrik. "Cheikh Anta Diop and the New Light on African History". nbufront.org. National Black United Front. Archived from the original on 19 February 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  87. "Cheikh Anta Diop, The Pharoah [sic] of Knowledge". Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  88. Rashidi, Runoko. "The Global African Presence". cwo.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  89. Sertima, Ivan Van. "Journal of African Civilizations". cwo.com. Archived from the original on 26 April 2006. Retrieved 15 October 2015.

Literature

Primary

Secondary

External links

Pan-Africanism
Ideology
Variants
Concepts
Proponents
Politicians
Others
Organizations
Educational
Political
Symbols
Dynamics
Related
Ethnocentrism
Regional variants
Related phenomena
Categories: