Revision as of 06:06, 17 November 2007 editSoxBot (talk | contribs)235,195 editsm Subsituting archive box that should have been, but was not.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:46, 6 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,291,232 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Buddhism}}, {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}. |
(382 intermediate revisions by 92 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Buddhism |
|
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|class=B |
|
|
|
{{calm}} |
|
|importance= |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Buddhism|importance=Top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=high|eastern=yes|religion=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
⚫ |
{{philosophy|importance=high|class=|eastern=yes|religion=yes}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Jainism|class=B|importance=top}} |
|
|
<!-- Template:Archive box begins --> |
|
|
{| class="infobox plainlinks" style="width: {{{box-width|238px}}}" |
|
|
|<div style="padding-top: 4px; text-align: center">{{{image|]}}}'''<br/>]''' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
---- |
|
|
{{#if:{{{auto|}}}|{{#ifeq:{{{auto}}}|long|{{Archive list long}}|<div style="text-align: center">{{archive list}}</div>}}{{#if:]|<br/>}}}}] |
|
|
|}<!-- Template:Archive box ends --> |
|
|
==Schopenhauer== |
|
|
Nirvana corresponds to Schopenhauer's concept of denial of the will. It can be positively called deliverance or salvation, but is actually a ''relative,'' '''negative''' ''concept' meaning '''nothingness.''' In its application to the world as experienced by an observer, it is the '''absence''' ''or'' '''non-existence''' ''of birth, disease, old age, and death and their related suffering due to craving or attachment''. This is in extreme contrast to the interpretation of Nirvana as a positive concept, that is, as a condition of happiness, joy, pleasure, eternal life, enlightenment, knowledge, and so forth. ] 00:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Lestrade |
|
|
::] wrote an article entitled "The Dialogues of Ascetic and King," included in his book ''Selected Non-Fictions''. In the article, he cites the writing of Heinrich Hackmann, who published ''Chinesische Philosophie'' in ]. Hackmann narrated a statement by the ] ] to ]'s ]. "Good works, he said, can lead to good retributions, but never to '''nirvana, which is the absolute extinction of the will''', not the consequence of an act." (Emphasis added) This is an example of the equivalence between Nirvana and Schopenhauer's Denial of the Will. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 03:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|
|
The word Nirvana is made up of tree words, Nir Va Djna and litteraly mean "withouth wrong thoughts", according to Buddha Dharma the changing of a wrong context into a skillfull context will automaticaly give rise to right view of the world as it is, ThathaGarba - "as it is with qualities", and permanent Buddha hood is reached. |
|
|
:::: Nirvana means "extinguished," as in a candle that is "not lit." It is a negative concept designating the absence of the fire of passion, will, and desire.] 23:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Lestrade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
== Disambiguation == |
|
|
|
| algo=old(90d) |
|
|
| archive=Talk:Nirvana/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter=2 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize=900K |
|
|
| archiveheader={{aan}} |
|
|
| minthreadsleft=2 |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Archive box|]}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Terms in wide use accepted into English are not foreign and must not be italicised== |
|
|
|
|
|
"Nirvana" (not the Pali ''nibbana'', not the Sanskrit ''Nirvāṇa'': those are foreign, indeed) is an English word. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of the terms in Yoga and Hinduism that have been widely used in English for many years, and can be found in the major English dictionaries (such as Oxford, Merriam-Webster). When a term is widely used in English, it is no longer "foreign" whatever its etymology, and should not be marked up in italics: the MoS policy on foreign words does not apply to terms adopted into English. ] (]) 08:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
: Agreed .--<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC">] ]</span> 13:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:: A discussion on the same point as it applies to multiple articles with names derived from Sanskrit is under way at ]. Colleagues may like to look in there. ] (]) 14:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Is Nirvana a "domain" analogous to heaven in which the deceased, united with The One, experiences eternal bliss? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skimming through this article I note a little bit of ambiguity on that point. I think the question should be made explicit and given its own topic heading. ] (]) 14:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC) James. |
|
There should be one available for this article. e.g. Nirvana (band) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
This is one of the terms in Yoga and Hinduism that have been widely used in English for many years, and can be found in the major English dictionaries (such as Oxford, Merriam-Webster). When a term is widely used in English, it is no longer "foreign" whatever its etymology, and should not be marked up in italics: the MoS policy on foreign words does not apply to terms adopted into English. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)