Revision as of 14:57, 30 November 2007 editGiovanni Giove (talk | contribs)3,770 edits →Assimilation of the ethnic minorities: rewritten← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:28, 5 December 2024 edit undo2600:4040:90b0:3800:64da:aa2a:7e99:44f2 (talk) →Canada 1800s–1990s: Forced assimilation: add comma. #hatnote-pediabearTag: Visual edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Adoption of features of another culture}} | |||
{{Distinguish|Intermarriage}} | |||
{{Use American English|date=July 2022}} | |||
{{otheruses|assimilation (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{Immigration sidebar}}{{Discrimination sidebar}} | |||
{{cleanup-remainder|date=December 2006}} | |||
{{Expert}} | |||
'''Cultural assimilation''' (often called merely ''assimilation'') is an intense process of consistent integration whereby members of an ethno-cultural group (such us ], or ]s) are "absorbed" into an established, generally larger community. This presumes a loss of many characteristics of the adsorbed group. | |||
'''Cultural assimilation''' is the process in which a ] or ] comes to resemble a society's ] or assimilates the values, behaviors, and beliefs of another group whether fully or partially.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaappl03spie |url-access=limited |last=Spielberger |first=Charles|publisher=Academic Press |year=2004 |isbn=9780126574104 |location=New York|pages=}}</ref> | |||
Assimilation can be the process through which people lose originally differentiating traits, such as dress, speech particularities or mannerisms, when they come into contact with another society or culture. | |||
The different types of cultural assimilation include full assimilation and ]. Full assimilation is the more prevalent of the two, as it occurs spontaneously.<ref name=":03">{{Cite web |title=Cultural Assimilation |url=http://www.govtgirlsekbalpur.com/Study_Materials/Geography/Part2_Hons_Geog_Module7_UnitIII_TOPIC3-4_Cultural_Assimilation.pdf}}</ref> When used as a political ideology, '''assimilationism''' refers to governmental policies of deliberately assimilating ethnic groups into the national culture.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/assimilationism |title=assimilationism |website=Dictionary.com |publisher=Rock Holdings}}</ref> | |||
Assimilation may be voluntary, which is usually the case with immigrants, or forced upon a group, as is usually the case with the receiving "host" group or country. | |||
During cultural assimilation, minority groups are expected to adapt to the everyday practices of the dominant culture through language and appearance as well as via more significant socioeconomic factors such as absorption into the local cultural and employment communities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Cultural Assimilation |url=https://norwalkcc.libguides.com/c.php?g=572609&p=3998124#:~:text=Assimilation%20is%20a%20much%20contested,benefit%20from%20full%20citizenship%20status. }}{{Dead link|date=December 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | |||
A region or society where assimilation is occurring is sometimes referred to as a ''']'''. | |||
Some types of cultural assimilation resemble ] in which a minority group or culture completely assimilates into the ] in which defining characteristics of the minority culture are less obverse or outright disappear; while in other types of cultural assimilation such as '''cultural integration''' mostly found in ] communities, a minority group within a given society adopts aspects of the ] through either ] or for practical reason like adapting to another society's ] while retaining their original culture. A conceptualization describes cultural assimilation as similar to acculturation<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Rural Isolation and Dual Cultural Existence: The Japanese-American Kona Coffee Community|last=Abe|first=David K.|date=2017-07-19|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=9783319553023|location=Cham|pages=17–18}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IlChlkDIy74C&q=%22cultural+assimilation%22+definition&pg=PT32|title=Keepin' It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White|last=Carter|first=Prudence L.|date=2005-09-15|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780199883387|language=en}}</ref> while another merely considers the former as one of the latter's phases.<ref name=":1" /> Throughout history there have been different forms of cultural assimilation examples of types of acculturation include voluntary and involuntary assimilation.<ref name=":02"/> | |||
Assimilation could also involve the so-called additive acculturation wherein, instead of replacing the ancestral culture, an individual expands their existing cultural repertoire.<ref name=":2" /> | |||
==Assimilation of immigrants== | |||
== Overview == | |||
Immigration, as held by some, is often thought to be in the interest of the politically and economically powerful elites more than in the interest of the weak (usually motivated by individual 'no choice', not collective goals). Where national groups are strongly urged to assimilate, there is often much resistance in spite of the use of governmental force. | |||
Cultural assimilation may involve either a quick or a gradual change depending on the circumstances of the group. Full assimilation occurs when members of a society become indistinguishable from those of the dominant group in society.<ref name=":03" /> | |||
Whether a given group should assimilate is often disputed by both members of the group and others in society. Cultural assimilation does not guarantee social alikeness. Geographical and other natural barriers between cultures, even if created by the predominant culture, may be culturally different. Cultural assimilation can happen either spontaneously or forcibly, the latter when more dominant cultures use various means aimed at ].<ref name=":03" /> | |||
If a government puts extreme emphasis on a homogeneous national identity, it may resort, especially in the case of minorities originating from historical foes, to harsh, even extreme measures to 'exterminate' the minority culture, sometimes to the point of considering the only alternative its physical elimination (expulsion or even genocide). Sometimes there are two contradictory tendencies at work. When a numerical minority and/or less developed culture achieves political power, usually by military conquest, it is in a formal position to impose elements of its culture on the counterpart, which usually happens at least at the start and in 'public' domains such as administration, but often this is more than compensated by a natural tendency for the older, richer culture and/or the law of numbers to see itself imitated by the new masters, e.g. the victorious ] adopted more from the ] cultures than it imposed in most domains, except such Roman specialties as law and the military. | |||
Various types of assimilation, including forced cultural assimilation, are particularly relevant regarding Indigenous groups during colonialism taking place between the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. This type of assimilation included religious conversion, separation of families, changes of gender roles, division of property among foreign power, elimination of local economies, and lack of sustainable food supply. Whether via colonialism or within one nation, methods of forced assimilation are often unsustainable, leading to revolts and collapses of power to maintain control over cultural norms. Often, cultures that are forced into different cultural practices through forced cultural assimilation revert to their native practices and religions that differ from the forced cultural values of other dominant powers.<ref name=":03" /> In addition throughout history, voluntary assimilation is often in response to pressure from a more predominant culture, and conformity is a solution for people to remain in safety. An example of voluntary cultural assimilation would be during the ], when Jews and Muslims accepted the Roman Catholic Church as their religion, but meanwhile, many people still privately practised their traditional religions. That type of assimilation is used to convince a dominant power that a culture has peacefully assimilated yet often voluntary assimilation does not mean the group fully conforms to the accepted cultural beliefs.<ref name=":02">{{Cite web|title=assimilation {{!}} Definition, History, & Facts|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/assimilation-society|website=Encyclopædia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> | |||
== Assimilation by immigrants and colonization == | |||
Assimilation is also the state of change. This occurs often with ]. When new immigrants enter a country, the surrounding people try to change the immigrants into what their culture or society expects. Sooner or later the immigrants will no longer seem to be immigrants, they will seem to be similar to every one else because of assimilation. Assimilation also occurred in Australia when the Europeans invaded the country and forced their traditions upon the Indigenous Australians. They treated the Aboriginal people like immigrants, but it was the Europeans that were the immigrants to Australia. | |||
The term "assimilation" is often used about not only indigenous groups but also immigrants settled in a new land. A new culture and new attitudes toward the original culture are obtained through contact and communication. Assimilation assumes that a relatively-tenuous culture gets to be united into one unified culture. That process happens through contact and accommodation between each culture. The current definition of assimilation is usually used to refer to immigrants, but in ], cultural assimilation can happen all over the world and within varying social contexts and is not limited to specific areas. | |||
Assimilation occurs when a majority forces the minority to conform. | |||
== Immigrant assimilation == | |||
== Assimilation of the ethnic minorities == | |||
Social scientists rely on four primary benchmarks to assess immigrant assimilation: ], geographic distribution, ] attainment, and ].<ref name="Waters" /> William A.V. Clark defines immigrant assimilation in the United States as "a way of understanding the ] of American society and that it is the process that occurs spontaneously and often unintended in the course of interaction between majority and ]."<ref name="Clark">{{Cite book |last=Clark |first=W. |year=2003 |title=Immigrants and the American Dream: Remaking the Middle Class |location=New York |publisher=Guilford Press |isbn=978-1-57230-880-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/immigrantsameric0000clar }}</ref> | |||
'''Cultural assimilation''' is an intense process of consistent integration ]s into an established, generally larger ethnic community. This presumes a loss of many characteristics which make the minorty different. | |||
See also ]. | |||
Studies have also noted the positive effects of immigrant assimilation. A study by Bleakley and Chin (2010) found that people who arrived in the US at or before the age of nine from non-English speaking countries tend to speak English at a similar level as those from English speaking countries. Conversely, those who arrived after nine from non–English speaking countries have much lower speaking proficiency and this increases linearly with age at arrival. The study also noted sociocultural impacts such as those with better English skills are less likely to be currently married, more likely to divorce, have fewer children, and have spouses closer to their age. Learning to speak English well is estimated to improve income by over 33 percent.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bleakley |first1=Hoyt |last2=Chin |first2=Aimee |date=May 2004 |title=Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from Childhood Immigrants* |url=https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031067 |journal=Review of Economics and Statistics |volume=86 |issue=2 |pages=481–496 |doi=10.1162/003465304323031067 |s2cid=18694108 |issn=0034-6535}}</ref> A 2014 study done by Verkuyten found that immigrant children who adapt through integration or assimilation are received more positively by their peers than those who adapt through marginalization or separation. | |||
==Assimilation of immigrants == | |||
While it is widely held that a given ethnic group may assimilate to its host culture over a period of time, rhetoric espoused by the host culture rarely takes into account the difficulties for the individuals involved. In fact, the question may be asked "is it possible for an individual to assimilate at all, and if so, till what age is it impossible?" | |||
== Perspective of dominant culture == | |||
In host countries, ethnic minority parents' children who have regular association with non-ethnic minority people are successful at assimilating. | |||
{{Main|Dominant culture}} | |||
There has been little to no existing research or evidence that demonstrates whether and how immigrant's mobility gains—assimilating to a dominant country such as language ability, socioeconomic status etc.— causes changes in the perception of those who were born in the dominant country. This essential type of research provides information on how immigrants are accepted into dominant countries. In an article by Ariela Schachter, titled "From "different" to "similar": an experimental approach to understanding assimilation", a survey was taken of white American citizens to view their perception of immigrants who now resided in the United States.<ref name=":5">{{cite journal |last1=Schachter |first1=Ariela |title=From "Different" to "Similar": An Experimental Approach to Understanding Assimilation |journal=American Sociological Review |date=1 October 2016 |volume=81 |issue=5 |pages=981–1013 |doi=10.1177/0003122416659248 |s2cid=151621019 |language=en |issn=0003-1224}}</ref> The survey indicated the whites tolerated immigrants in their home country. White natives are open to having "structural" relation with the immigrants-origin individuals, for instance, friends and neighbors; however, this was with the exception of black immigrants and natives and undocumented immigrants.<ref name=":5" /> However, at the same time, white Americans viewed all non-white Americans, regardless of legal status, as dissimilar. | |||
A similar journal by Jens Hainmueller and Daniel J. Hopkins titled "The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants" confirmed similar attitudes towards immigrants.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hainmueller |first1=Jens |last2=Hopkins |first2=Daniel J. |title=The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants |journal=American Journal of Political Science |date=2015 |volume=59 |issue=3 |pages=529–548 |issn=0092-5853|jstor=24583081 |doi=10.1111/ajps.12138 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The researchers used an experiment to reach their goal which was to test nine theoretical relevant attributes of hypothetical immigrants. Asking a population-based sample of U.S. citizens to decide between pairs of immigrants applying for admission to the United States, the U.S. citizen would see an application with information for two immigrants including notes about their education status, country, origin, and other attributes. The results showed Americans viewed educated immigrants in high-status jobs favourably, whereas they view the following groups unfavourably: those who lack plans to work, those who entered without authorization, those who are not fluent in English and those of Iraqi descent. | |||
It may be argued that past occurrences of assimilation are really only occurrences of compatibility of cultures. It is hard to distinguish between situations where a given ethnic group has assimilated and situations where said group has merely become a contributing sector of society. | |||
== Adaptation to new country == | |||
Some contemporary scholars of immigration, such as ], ], ], ], and ], argue that immigrants and children of immigrants often fit into host societies through ''adaptation'', more selectively than assimilation: they retain or re-shape elements of their ethnic culture depending on how the culture meets their needs in the host society. | |||
As the number of international students entering the US has increased, so has the number of international students in US colleges and universities. The adaptation of these newcomers is important in cross-cultural research. In the study "Cross-Cultural Adaptation of International College Student in the United States" by Yikang Wang, the goal was to examine how the psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of international college students varied over time.<ref name=":6">{{cite journal |last1=Wang |first1=Yikang |last2=Li |first2=Ting |last3=Noltemeyer |first3=Amity |last4=Wang |first4=Aimin |last5=Zhang |first5=Jinghua |last6=Shaw |first6=Kevin |title=Cross-Cultural Adaptation of International College Students in the United States |journal=Journal of International Students |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=821–842 |url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1180864 |language=en |issn=2162-3104|date=2017-11-30 |doi=10.32674/jis.v8i2.116 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The survey contained a sample of 169 international students attending a coeducational public university. The two subtypes of adaptation: psychological and socio-cultural were examined. Psychological adaptation refers to "feelings of well-being or satisfaction during cross-cultural transitions;"<ref name="ShockPsych">{{Cite book|title=The psychology of culture shock|last=Ward, Colleen A.|date=2001|publisher=Routledge|others=Bochner, Stephen., Furnham, Adrian.|isbn=978-0415162340|edition= 2nd|location=Hove, East Sussex|oclc=44927055}}</ref> while socio-cultural refers to the ability to fit into the new culture.<ref name="ShockPsych"/> The results for both graduate and undergraduate students show both satisfaction and socio-cultural skills changed over time. Psychological adaptation had the most significant change for a student who has resided in the US for at least 24 months while socio-cultural adaptation steadily increased over time. It can be concluded that eventually over time, the minority group will shed some of their culture's characteristic when in a new country and incorporate new culture qualities. Also, it was confirmed that more time spent in a new country would result in becoming more accustomed to the dominant countries' characteristics. | |||
Figure 2 demonstrates as the length of time resided in the United States increase—the dominant country, the life satisfaction and socio-cultural skill increase as well—positive correlation.<ref name=":6" /> | |||
==Religious assimilation== | |||
{{main|Jewish Assimilation}} | |||
In turn, research by ]'s group, published in 2020, shows that one semester of classroom experiential activities designed to foster international and domestic student social interaction serve to foster international students’ ''sense of belonging and social support''.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Caligiuri |first1=Paula |last2=DuBois |first2=Cathy L.Z. |last3=Lundby |first3=Kyle |last4=Sinclair |first4=Elizabeth A |date=2020-12-01 |title=Fostering international students' sense of belonging and perceived social support through a semester-long experiential activity |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745499920954311 |journal=Research in Comparative and International Education |language=en |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=357–370 |doi=10.1177/1745499920954311 |s2cid=225001702 |issn=1745-4999}}</ref> | |||
Assimilation also includes to the (often forced) conversion or secularization of religious members of a minority group, especially ]. Throughout the Middle Ages and until the mid-], most Jews were forced to live in small towns and were restricted from entering universities or high-level professions. The only way to get ahead in the host culture was to abandon their identification with co-religionists and become "assimilated Jews." Well-known assimilated Jews of this period include ], ], and ], who became dissociated with ]. In the second half of the ], rampant assimilation in the form of Jewish-Christian ] decimated the ranks of Orthodox Judaism even further. Jewish law (]) does not recognize children of non-Jewish mothers as Jewish, and further, the children of intermarriage may not be raised with a strong Jewish identity and tend to intermarry themselves. | |||
In a study by Viola Angelini, "Life Satisfaction of Immigrant: Does cultural assimilation matter?", the theory of assimilation as having benefits for well-being.<ref name=":3">{{cite journal |last1=Angelini |first1=Viola |last2=Casi |first2=Laura |last3=Corazzini |first3=Luca |title=Life satisfaction of immigrants: does cultural assimilation matter? |journal=Journal of Population Economics |date=1 July 2015 |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=817–844 |doi=10.1007/s00148-015-0552-1 |s2cid=9417180 |language=en |issn=1432-1475|url=http://economia.unipd.it/sites/decon.unipd.it/files/20130168.pdf |doi-access=free }}</ref> The goal of this study was to assess the difference between cultural assimilation and the subjective well-being of immigrants. The journal included a study that examined a "direct measure of assimilation with a host culture and immigrants' subjective well-being."<ref name=":3" /> Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, it was concluded that there was a positive correlation between cultural assimilation and an immigrant's life's satisfaction/wellbeing even after discarding factors such as employment status, wages, etc. "Life Satisfaction of Immigrant: Does cultural assimilation matter?" also confirms "association with life satisfaction is stronger for established immigrants than for recent ones."<ref name=":3" /> It was found that the more immigrants that identified with the German culture and who spoke the fluent national language—dominant country language, the more they reported to be satisfied with their lives. Life satisfaction rates were higher for those who had assimilated to the dominant country than those who had not assimilated since those who did incorporate the dominant language, religion, psychological aspects, etc. | |||
==See also== | |||
== Willingness to assimilate and cultural shock == | |||
{{Further|Culture shock}}In the study "Examination of cultural shock, intercultural sensitivity and willingness to adopt" by Clare D’Souza, the study uses a diary method to analyze the data collected.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=D’Souza|first1=Clare|last2=Halimi|first2=Tariq|last3=Singaraju|first3=Stephen|last4=Sillivan Mort|first4=Gillian|date=2016-09-21|title=Examination of cultural shock, intercultural sensitivity and willingness to adapt|journal=Education + Training|volume=58|issue=9|pages=906–925|doi=10.1108/ET-09-2015-0087|issn=0040-0912}}</ref> The study involved students undergoing a study abroad tour. The results show negative intercultural sensitivity is much greater in participants who experience "culture shock."<ref name=":7" /> Those who experience culture shock have emotional expression and responses of hostility, anger, negativity, anxiety frustration, isolation, and regression. Also, for one who has traveled to the country before permanently moving, they would have predetermined beliefs about the culture and their status within the country. The emotional expression for this individual includes excitement, happiness, eagerness, and euphoria. | |||
Another article titled "International Students from Melbourne Describing Their Cross-Cultural Transitions Experiences: Culture Shock, Social Interaction, and Friendship Development" by Nish Belford focuses on cultural shock.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Belford|first=Nish|date=2017|title=International Students from Melbourne Describing Their Cross-Cultural Transitions Experiences: Culture Shock, Social Interaction, and Friendship Development|url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140256|journal=Journal of International Students|language=en|volume=7|issue=3|pages=499–521|issn=2162-3104|doi=10.32674/jis.v7i3.206|doi-access=free}}</ref> Belford interviewed international students to explore their experience after living and studying in ], Australia. The data collected were narratives from the students that focused on variables such as "cultural similarity, intercultural communication competence, intercultural friendship, and relational identity to influence their experiences."<ref name=":4" /> | |||
=== United States === | |||
{{Further|Americanization (immigration)}} | |||
Between 1880 and 1920, the United States took in roughly 24 million ].<ref name="Waters">{{Cite journal |last1=Waters |first1=Mary C. |last2=Jiménez |first2=Tomás R. |title=Assessing Immigrant Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges |journal=] |volume=31 |issue=1 |year=2005 |pages=105–125 |doi=10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100026 |s2cid=9815854 |url=http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3203280 }}</ref> This increase in immigration can be attributed to many historical changes. The beginning of the 21st century has also marked a massive era of immigration, and sociologists are once again trying to make sense of the impacts that immigration has on society and on the immigrants themselves.<ref name="Waters"/> | |||
Assimilation had various meanings in American sociology. ] associates American assimilation with Americanization or the "]" theory. Some scholars also believed that assimilation and acculturation were synonymous. According to a common point of view, assimilation is a "process of interpretation and fusion" from another group or person. That may include memories, behaviors, and sentiments. By sharing their experiences and histories, they blend into the common cultural life.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/earth-and-environment/ecology-and-environmentalism/environmental-studies/assimilation|title=Assimilation facts, information, pictures {{!}} Encyclopedia.com articles about Assimilation|website=www.encyclopedia.com|access-date=2016-11-11}}</ref> A related theory is structural pluralism proposed by American sociologist ]. It describes the American situation wherein despite the cultural assimilation of ethnic groups to mainstream American society, they maintained structural separation.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Immigration, Assimilation, and the Cultural Construction of American National Identity|last=Anderson|first=Shannon Latkin|publisher=Routledge|year=2016|isbn=9781138100411|location=New York|pages=135}}</ref> Gordon maintained that there is limited integration of the immigrants into American social institutions such as educational, occupational, political, and social cliques.<ref name=":2"/> | |||
During The Colonial Period from 1607 to 1776, individuals immigrated to the British colonies on two very different paths—voluntary and forced migration. Those who migrated to the colonies on their own volition were drawn by the allure of cheap land, high wages, and the freedom of conscience in British North America.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Spickard |first=Paul |title=Almost All Aliens: Immigration, Race, and Colonialism in American History and Identity |publisher=New York: Routledge |year=2007 |pages=50–51}}</ref> On the latter half, the largest population of forced migrants to the colonies was African slaves.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-07-25 |title=An Overview of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade |url=https://brewminate.com/an-overview-of-the-trans-atlantic-slave-trade/ |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=Brewminate: A Bold Blend of News and Ideas |language=en-US}}</ref> Slavery was different from the other forced migrations as, unlike in the case of convicts, there was no possibility of earning freedom, although some slaves were manumitted in the centuries before the American Civil War.<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy from the Colonial Period to the Present Day |url=https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/brief-history-us-immigration-policy-colonial-period-present-day#voluntary-forced-migration |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=www.cato.org}}</ref> The long history of immigration in the established gateways means that the place of immigrants in terms of ], ], and ] hierarchies in the traditional gateways is more structured or established, but on the other hand, the new gateways do not have much immigration ] and so the place of immigrants in terms of class, racial, and ethnic hierarchies are less defined, and immigrants may have more influence to define their position. Secondly, the size of the new gateways may influence immigrant assimilation. Having a smaller gateway may influence the level of ] among immigrants and native-born people. Thirdly, the difference in institutional arrangements may influence immigrant assimilation. Traditional gateways, unlike new gateways, have many institutions set up to help immigrants such as legal aid, bureaus, and social organizations. Finally, Waters and Jimenez have only speculated that those differences may influence immigrant assimilation and the way researchers that should assess immigrant assimilation.<ref name="Waters"/> | |||
Furthermore, the advancement and ] into the United States has accounted for 29% of U.S. population growth since 2000.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-09-28 |title=Chapter 5: U.S. Foreign-Born Population Trends |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2015/09/28/chapter-5-u-s-foreign-born-population-trends/ |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=Pew Research Center's Hispanic Trends Project |language=en-US}}</ref> Recent arrival of immigrants to the United States has been examined closely over the last two decades. The results show the driving factors for immigration including citizenship, homeownership, English language proficiency, job status, and earning a better income.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Assimilation Today |url=https://www.americanprogress.org/article/assimilation-today/ |access-date=2022-04-14 |website=Center for American Progress |date=September 2010 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== Canada === | |||
Canada's multicultural history dates back to the period ] from the 16th to 19th centuries, with waves of ethnic European ] to the region. In the 20th century, ], ] and ] were the largest immigrant groups.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/building-mosaic-evolution-canadas-approach-immigrant-integration|title=Building a Mosaic: The Evolution of Canada's Approach to Immigrant Integration|last=Griffith|first=Andrew|date=2017-10-31|website=migrationpolicy.org|language=en|access-date=2018-12-10}}</ref> | |||
==== 20th century–present: Shift from assimilation to integration ==== | |||
Canada remains ]. The 2016 census recorded 7.5 million documented immigrants, representing a fifth of the country's total population.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2017028-eng.htm|title=Immigrant population in Canada, 2016 Census of Population|last=Government of Canada|first=Statistics Canada|date=2017-10-25|website=www150.statcan.gc.ca|access-date=2018-12-10}}</ref> Focus has shifted from a rhetoric of cultural assimilation to cultural integration.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/200920E|title=Canadian Multiculturalism|website=lop.parl.ca|access-date=2019-11-16}}</ref> In contrast to assimilationism, integration aims to preserve the roots of a minority society while still allowing for smooth coexistence with the dominant culture.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
== Indigenous assimilation == | |||
===Australia=== | |||
{{Further|Aboriginal Australians|New Deal for Aborigines|Stolen Generations}} | |||
Legislation applying the policy of "protection" over ] (separating them from white society<ref name=at/>) was adopted in some ] when they were still colonies, before the ]: in the ] in 1867, ] in 1886, and ] in 1897. After federation, ] crafted their policy in 1909, ] and the ] (which was under the control and of South Australia at the time) in 1910–11. ]s missions and Government-run ]s were created, and Aboriginal people moved onto them. Legislation restricted their movement, prohibited ] and regulated employment. The policies were reinforced in the first half of the 20th century (when it was realized that Aboriginal people would not die out or be fully absorbed in white society<ref name=at/>) such as in the provisions of the '']'', in which Aboriginal people were made ]. "Part-Aboriginal" (known as ]) children were forcibly removed from their parents in order to educate them in European ways; the girls were often trained to be ]s.<ref name=alrc>{{cite book|url=https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/recognition-of-aboriginal-customary-laws-alrc-report-31/3-aboriginal-societies-the-experience-of-contact/changing-policies-towards-aboriginal-people/|title=Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws|series=ALRC Report 31|author=Australian Law Reform Commission|author-link=Australian Law Reform Commission|date=18 August 2010|chapter=3. Aboriginal Societies: The Experience of Contact: Changing Policies Towards Aboriginal People|access-date=10 August 2020}}</ref> The protectionist policies were discontinued, and assimilationist policies took over. These proposed that "full-blood" ] should be allowed to “die out”, while "half-castes" were encouraged to assimilate into the white community. Indigenous people were regarded as inferior to white people by these policies, and often experienced ] after having to move to seek work.<ref name=at>{{cite web | title=A White Australia | website=Australians Together | url=https://australianstogether.org.au/discover/australian-history/a-white-australia/ | access-date=10 August 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/digitised_collections/remove/89976.pdf|via=AIATSIS|title=Annual Report 1958/59|author=Northern Territory Administration. Welfare Branch|date=1959|access-date=10 August 2020 }}</ref> | |||
Between 1910 and 1970, several generations of Indigenous children were removed from their parents, and have become known as the ]. The policy has done lasting damage to individuals, family and Indigenous culture.<ref name=at/> | |||
The ] announced in 1939 marked the end of official policies based around "biological absorption" or "elimination" of Indigenous peoples, replaced with cultural assimilation as a prerequisite for civil rights. The 1961 Native Welfare Conference in Canberra, Australian federal and state government ministers formulated an official definition of "assimilation" of Indigenous Australians for government contexts. Federal territories minister ] informed the House of Representatives in April 1961 that:<ref>{{cite news|url=https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/catalogue_resources/18801.pdf|title=The Policy of Assimilation: Decisions of Commonwealth and Statement Ministers at the Native Welfare Conference, Canberra, January 26th and 27th, 1961|publisher=Commonwealth Government Printer|location=Canberra|via=AIATSIS Library|year=1961|first=Paul|last=Hasluck}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote>The policy of assimilation means in the view of all Australian governments that all aborigines and part-aborigines are expected eventually to attain the same manner of living as other Australians and to live as members of a single Australian community enjoying the same rights and privileges, accepting the same responsibilities, observing the same customs and influenced by the same beliefs, hopes and loyalties as other Australians. Thus, any special measures taken for aborigines and part-aborigines are regarded as temporary measures not based on colour but intended to meet their need for special care and assistance to protect them from any ill effects of sudden change and to assist them to make the transition from one stage to another in such a way as will be favourable to their future social, economic and political advancement.</blockquote> | |||
=== Brazil === | |||
In January 2019, the newly elected ] President ] stripped the Indigenous Affairs Agency ] of the responsibility to identify and demarcate ]. He argued that those territories have very tiny isolated populations and proposed to integrate them into the larger Brazilian society.<ref>{{cite news |title=Brazil's new president makes it harder to define Indigenous lands |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4808295/jair-bolsonaro-funai-indigenous-farm-brazil/ |work=Global News |date=January 2, 2019}}</ref> According to the ], "Taking responsibility for Indigenous land demarcation away from FUNAI, the Indian affairs department, and giving it to the Agriculture Ministry is virtually a declaration of open warfare against ]."<ref>{{cite news |title=President Bolsonaro 'declares war on Brazil's Indigenous peoples – Survival responds |url=https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/12060 |publisher=] |date=January 3, 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== Canada 1800s–1990s: Forced assimilation === | |||
During the 19th and 20th centuries, and continuing until 1996, when the last ] was closed, the Canadian government, aided by Christian Churches, began an assimilationist campaign to forcibly assimilate ]. The government consolidated power over Indigenous land through treaties and the use of force, eventually isolating most Indigenous peoples to reserves. Marriage practices and spiritual ceremonies were banned, and spiritual leaders were imprisoned. Additionally, the Canadian government instituted an extensive residential school system to assimilate children. Indigenous children were separated from their families and no longer permitted to express their culture at these new schools. They were not allowed to speak their language or practice their own traditions without receiving punishment. There were many cases of violence and sexual abuse committed by the Christian church. The ] concluded that this effort amounted to ]. The schools actively worked to alienate children from their cultural roots. Students were prohibited from speaking their native languages, were regularly abused, and were arranged marriages by the government after their graduation. The explicit goal of the Canadian government, through the Catholic and Anglican churches, was to completely assimilate Indigenous peoples into broader Canadian society and destroy all traces of their native history.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.myrobust.com/websites/trcinstitution/File/Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf|title=Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180626204608/http://www.myrobust.com/websites/trcinstitution/File/Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf|archive-date=26 June 2018}}</ref> | |||
=== Croatia and Transylvania === | |||
During Croatia’s ], ethnic Croatians were pressured to abandon their traditional customs in favor of adopting elements of Hungarian culture, such as ] and the ]. Because of this, elements of Hungarian culture were considered part of Croatian culture, and can still be seen in modern Croatian culture.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p_oLAQAAMAAJ&q=Magyarization+oppression |title=The Central European Observer – Joseph Hanč, F. Souček, Aleš Brož, Jaroslav Kraus, Stanislav V. Klíma – Google Books |date=December 1933 |access-date=2024-07-09}}</ref> | |||
Throughout the ], many citizens, primarily those who belonged to minority groups, were forced to convert to ]. The forced conversion policy was harshest in Croatia and Transylvania, where civilians could be sent to prison for refusing to convert.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kostelj |first=Ivica |title=Hrvatski arkivi: Zatvorski spisi od 1000. do 1500. godine |year=1998 |location=Zagreb, Croatia |publication-date=24 October 1998 |language=Croatian |trans-title=Croatian archives: Prison records from the years 1000 to 1500}}</ref> Romanian cultural anthropologist Ioan Lupaș claims that between 1002, when Transylvania became part of the Kingdom of Hungary, to 1300, approximately 200,000 non-Hungarians living in Transylvania were jailed for resisting Catholic conversion, and about 50,000 of them died in prison.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lupaș |first=Ioan |author-link=Ioan Lupaș |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_0ppAAAAMAAJ |title=The Hungarian Policy of Magyarization |publisher=Romanian Cultural Foundation |year=1992}}</ref> | |||
=== Mexico and Peru=== | |||
A major contributor to cultural assimilation in South America began during exploration and colonialism that often is thought by Bartolomé de Las Casas to begin in 1492 when Europeans began to explore the Atlantic in search of "the Indies", leading to the discovery of the Americas. Europe remained dominant over the Americas' Indigenous populations as resources such as labor, natural resources i.e. lumber, copper, gold, silver, and agricultural products flooded into Europe, yet these gains were one-sided, as Indigenous groups did not benefit from trade deals with colonial powers.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The American Yawp |url=http://www.americanyawp.com/text/01-the-new-world/}}</ref> In addition to this, colonial metropoles such as Portugal and Spain required that colonies in South America assimilate to European customs – such as following the Holy ], acceptance of Spanish or Portuguese over Indigenous languages and accepting European-style government.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492 |url=https://www.crf-usa.org/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-25-1-the-columbian-exchange |archive-url=}}</ref> | |||
Through forceful assimilationist policies, colonial powers such as Spain used methods of violence to assert cultural dominance over Indigenous populations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gabbert |first=Wolfgang |date=2012 |title=The longue durée of Colonial Violence in Latin America |journal=Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |volume=37 |issue=3 (141) |pages=254–275 |issn=0172-6404 |jstor=41636608}}</ref> One example occurred in 1519 when the Spanish explorer ] reached ] – the original capital of the Aztec Empire in Mexico.<ref name=":122">{{Cite web |title=The Spanish conquistadores and colonial empire (article) |url=https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/precontact-and-early-colonial-era/spanish-colonization/a/the-spanish-conquistadores-and-colonial-empire |access-date=2020-05-28 |website=Khan Academy |language=en}}</ref> After discovering that the Aztecs practiced human sacrifice, Cortés killed high-ranked Aztecs and held ], the Aztec ruler, captive. Shortly after, Cortés began creating alliances to resume power in Tenochtitlán and renamed it Mexico City. Without taking away power through murder and spread of infectious diseases the Spanish ] (relatively small in number) would not have been able to take over Mexico and convert many people to Catholicism and slavery. While Spaniards influenced linguistic and religious cultural assimilation among Indigenous peoples in South America during colonialism, many Indigenous languages such as the Incan language ] are still used in places such as Peru to this day by at least 4 million people. | |||
=== New Zealand === | |||
In the course of the ] from the late-18th century onwards, assimilation of the indigenous ] population to the culture of incoming European visitors and settlers at first occurred spontaneously. Genetic assimilation commenced early and continued – the 1961 ] classified only 62.2% of Māori as "full-blood Maoris".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| author1 = New Zealand. Department of Statistics | |||
| title = Population Census, 1961 | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=pUExAQAAIAAJ | |||
| volume = 10 | |||
| date = 1962 | |||
| page = 23 | |||
| access-date = 16 July 2020 | |||
| quote = Full-blood Maoris totalled 103,987 , or 62 2 per cent of the Maori population as it is defined for the purposes of the census. | |||
}}</ref> (Compare ].) Linguistic assimilation also occurred early and ongoingly: European settler populations ], while European languages affected Māori vocabulary (and possibly phonology).<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Thomason | |||
| first1 = Sarah Grey | |||
| author-link1 = Sarah Thomason | |||
| title = Language Contact | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=FGhjAAAAMAAJ | |||
| series = Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series | |||
| publisher = Georgetown University Press | |||
| date = 2001 | |||
| page = 135 | |||
| isbn = 9780878408542 | |||
| access-date = 16 July 2020 | |||
| quote = It is possible that, although older English loanwords were nativized into Maori phonology, newer loanwords are no longer being nativized, with the eventual result being a changed Maori phonological system. | |||
}}</ref> | |||
In the 19th century colonial governments ''de facto'' encouraged assimilationist policies;<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Hoskins | |||
| first1 = Te Kawehau | |||
| last2 = McKinley | |||
| first2 = Elizabeth | |||
| author-link2 = Elizabeth McKinley | |||
| chapter = New Zealand: Maori Education in Aotearoa | |||
| editor1-last = Crossley | |||
| editor1-first = Michael | |||
| editor2-last = Hancock | |||
| editor2-first = Greg | |||
| editor3-last = Sprague | |||
| editor3-first = Terra | |||
| title = Education in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=rvnrBQAAQBAJ | |||
| series = Education Around the World | |||
| location = London | |||
| publisher = Bloomsbury Publishing | |||
| date = 2015 | |||
| page = 159 | |||
| isbn = 9781472503589 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = The gaping disparity in outcomes between indigenous Māori students and Pākehā (New Zealand Europeans) has its genesis in the colonial provision of education for Māori driven by a social policy of cultural assimilation and social stratification for over 100 years. | |||
}}</ref> by the late-20th century, policies favored ] development.<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Hoskins | |||
| first1 = Te Kawehau | |||
| last2 = McKinley | |||
| first2 = Elizabeth | |||
| author-link2 = Elizabeth McKinley | |||
| chapter = New Zealand: Maori Education in Aotearoa | |||
| editor1-last = Crossley | |||
| editor1-first = Michael | |||
| editor2-last = Hancock | |||
| editor2-first = Greg | |||
| editor3-last = Sprague | |||
| editor3-first = Terra | |||
| title = Education in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=rvnrBQAAQBAJ | |||
| series = Education Around the World | |||
| location = London | |||
| publisher = Bloomsbury Publishing | |||
| date = 2015 | |||
| page = 159 | |||
| isbn = 9781472503589 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = From the 1970s, Maori activism across the social field has led to a formal social policy of biculturalism and iwi (tribes) positioned as partners with the state.}}</ref> Māori readily and early adopted some aspects of European-borne ] (metals,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Neich | |||
| first1 = Roger | |||
| title = Carved Histories: Rotorua Ngati Tarawhai Woodcarving | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=o0Yh5gNKTQMC | |||
| location = Auckland | |||
| publisher = Auckland University Press | |||
| date = 2001 | |||
| page = 147 | |||
| isbn = 9781869402570 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = The change from stone to metal tools occurred at different times in different areas of the North Island, depending on the amount of contact with European visitors. In the coastal areas this happened very early, starting with the metal obtained from Captain Cook's men and other eighteenth-century explorers such as Jean-Francois-Marie de Durville and Marion du Fresne, followed very soon after by the sealers and whalers. Away from the coasts, the first metals arrived later, in the early nineteenth century, usually as trade items brought by missionary explorers. | |||
}}</ref> ]s,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Smith | |||
| first1 = Ian | |||
| year = 2019 | |||
| chapter = Sojourning settlers | |||
| title = Pākehā Settlements in a Māori World: New Zealand Archaeology 1769–1860 | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=613MDwAAQBAJ | |||
| location = Wellington | |||
| publisher = Bridget Williams Books | |||
| publication-date = 2020 | |||
| page = 129 | |||
| isbn = 9780947492496 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = It appears that firearms were first acquired by Māori somewhere in the northern North Island about 1806 or 1807. | |||
}}</ref> potatoes<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| editor1-last = Harris | |||
| editor1-first = Warwick | |||
| editor2-last = Kapoor | |||
| editor2-first = Promila | |||
| title = Nga Mahi Maori O Te Wao Nui a Tane: Contributions to an International Workshop on Ethnobotany, Te Rehua Marae, Christchurch, New Zealand, 22–26 February 1988 | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=MExEAAAAYAAJ | |||
| publisher = Botany Division, DSIR | |||
| date = 1988 | |||
| page = 181 | |||
| isbn = 9780477025799 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = The first record of potatoes being grown in New Zealand is dated 1769. The Maori community were quick to see the advantages the potato had over the kumara: its greater cold tolerance, better storage qualities and higher yields. | |||
}}</ref>) relatively rapidly. Imported ideas – such as writing,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = McKenzie | |||
| first1 = Donald Francis | |||
| title = Oral Culture, Literacy & Print in early New Zealand: The Treaty of Waitangi | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Pu5x9Nkj1-kC | |||
| location = Wellington | |||
| publisher = Victoria University Press | |||
| date = 1985 | |||
| page = 20 | |||
| isbn = 9780864730435 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = In the early 1830s we see the hesitant beginnings of letter writing in written requests for baptism . The effective use of letters for political purposes was many years away. Nor did printing of itself become a re-expressive tool for the Maori until the late 1850s. | |||
}}</ref> Christianity,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Crosby | |||
| first1 = Alfred W. | |||
| author-link1 = Alfred W. Crosby | |||
| year = 1986 | |||
| title = Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900 | |||
| series = Studies in Environment and History | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=DUSbAAAAQBAJ | |||
| location = Cambridge | |||
| publisher = Cambridge University Press | |||
| publication-date = 2004 | |||
| edition= 2 | |||
| isbn = 9781107394049 | |||
| page = 246 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = There were no Maori conversions up to 1825, and only a few - usually of the moribund - between 1825 and 1830. | |||
}}</ref> ], ], everyday European-style clothing,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = King | |||
| first1 = Michael | |||
| author-link1 = Michael King (historian) | |||
| year = 2003 | |||
| title = The Penguin History of New Zealand | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=LKQP2sw_BVoC | |||
| publisher = ReadHowYouWant.com | |||
| publication-date = 2011 | |||
| page = 286 | |||
| isbn = 9781459623750 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = Traditional Maori clothing had gone out of general use by the 1850s (and much earlier in communities associated with whaling and trading and those close to European settlements), though it would still be donned, especially cloaks, for ceremonial occasions and cultural performances. As the European settler population had begun to swell in the 1840s, so European clothes, new and second-hand, had become widely available along with blankets, which had the advantage of being usable as clothing and/or bedding. | |||
}}</ref> or disapproval of slavery<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Petrie | |||
| first1 = Hazel | |||
| title = Outcasts of the Gods? The Struggle over Slavery in Maori New Zealand | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=1xJzCgAAQBAJ | |||
| publisher = Auckland University Press | |||
| date = 2015 | |||
| isbn = 9781775587859 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
}}</ref> – spread more slowly. Later developments (socialism,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Stoddart-Smith | |||
| first1 = Carrie | |||
| chapter = Radical kaupapa Maori politics | |||
| editor1-last = Godfery | |||
| editor1-first = Morgan | |||
| title = The Interregnum: Rethinking New Zealand | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ofq9CwAAQBAJ | |||
| series = BWB Texts | |||
| volume = 39 | |||
| publisher = Bridget Williams Books | |||
| date = 2016 | |||
| pages = 38–39 | |||
| isbn = 9780947492656 | |||
| access-date = 15 July 2020 | |||
| quote = different western ideas may complement the diverse perspectives of kaupapa Māori frameworks, but it would be an error to construe such ideas as essential to them. Many Māori drive a socialist agenda, for example, and although there are commonalities with some aspects of tikanga Māori, socialism as a political philosophy should not be seen to be implied by Māori narratives. | |||
}}</ref> anti-colonialist theory,<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Buick-Constable | |||
| first1 = John | |||
| chapter = Indigenous State Relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A Contractual Approach to Self-determination | |||
| editor1-last = Hocking | |||
| editor1-first = Barbara Ann | |||
| title = Unfinished Constitutional Business?: Rethinking Indigenous Self-determination | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mY6GAwAAQBAJ | |||
| location = Canberra | |||
| publisher = Aboriginal Studies Press | |||
| date = 2005 | |||
| page = 120 | |||
| isbn = 9780855754662 | |||
| access-date = 16 July 2020 | |||
| quote = From the 1970s, in the wake of a changed international climate of human rights and anti-colonialism, Indigenous peoples around the world sought a reinvigoration of their Indigenous identity and a renewal of their Indigenous self-determination. Largely in tandem with these trends has been a renaissance of the theory and practice of contractualism . The history of Maori-Crown relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand is exemplary of this contractual approach in the struggles of Maori for self-determination historically and contemporaneously. | |||
}}</ref> ] ideas<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = O'Regan | |||
| first1 = Tipene | |||
| author-link1 = Tipene O'Regan | |||
| title = New Myths and Old Politics: The Waitangi Tribunal and the Challenge of Tradition | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=kT3fAwAAQBAJ | |||
| series = BWB Texts | |||
| volume = 17 | |||
| location = Wellington | |||
| publisher = Bridget Williams Books | |||
| date = 2014 | |||
| isbn = 9781927131992 | |||
| access-date = 16 July 2020 | |||
| quote = my Beaglehole Memorial Lecture of 1991 was delivered at a time when hearings of the Tribunal were becoming a battleground . Māoridom itself was experiencing a remarkable efflorescence of freshly reconstructed group identities and New Age-style incorporations into Māori ethnic identity. The Waitaha movement emanating from within contemporary Ngāi Tahu was one of these. | |||
}}</ref>) have proven more internationally mobile. One long-standing view presents Māori communalism as unassimilated with European-style ].<ref> | |||
For example: | |||
{{cite book | |||
| last1 = Ward | |||
| first1 = Alan | |||
| author-link1 = Alan Ward (historian) | |||
| year = 1974 | |||
| chapter = Myths and Realities | |||
| title = A Show of Justice: Racial 'amalgamation' in Nineteenth Century New Zealand | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=l9taAwAAQBAJ | |||
| publisher = Auckland University Press | |||
| publication-date = 2013 | |||
| isbn = 9781869405717 | |||
| access-date = 16 July 2020 | |||
| quote = It is often said that Western individualism is in conflict with Polynesian communalism . It is hardly surprising that today Maori attitudes to the law appear more ambivalent than they did in the 1870s and 1880s. | |||
}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
{{Portal|Society}} | |||
{{div col|colwidth=22em}} | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ], a Jewish holiday concerning a triumph over assimilation | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
'''Culture-specific:''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (of Australian Aborigines) | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* "]" | * "]" | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== References == | |||
==Sources, references and external links== | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
== Bibliography == | |||
] | |||
{{div col|colwidth=30em|Pauls, Elizabeth Prine. “Assimilation.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 21 August 2019, www.britannica.com/topic/assimilation-society.=}} | |||
] | |||
* {{Cite book |first1=Richard D. |last1=Alba |first2=Victor |last2=Nee |authorlink1=Richard Alba|authorlink2=Victor Nee|date=2003 |title=Remaking the American Mainstream. Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration |publisher=Harvard University Press |ref=359 pages |isbn=978-0-674-01813-6}} | |||
] | |||
* {{cite book |first=Andrew |last=Armitage |date=1995 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y-hBstoLN-MC |title=Comparing the Policy of Aboriginal Assimilation: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand |publisher=UBC Press |ref=286 pages |isbn=978-0-7748-0459-2}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=James A. |last=Crispino |date=1980 |title=The Assimilation of Ethnic Groups: The Italian Case |publisher=Center for Migration Studies |ref=205 pages |isbn=978-0-913256-39-8}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Julius |last=Drachsler |date=1920 |title=Democracy and Assimilation: The Blending of Immigrant Heritages in America |url=https://archive.org/details/democracyandass00dracgoog |publisher=Macmillan |ref=275 pages}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Gordon |first=Milton M. |title=Assimilation in America: Theory and Reality |editor=Daedalus Yetman |pages=245–258 |journal=Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences |place=Boston, Mass. |volume=90 |issue=2 |ref=263–285.Q11.B7}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Milton M. |last=Gordon |title=Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins |url=https://archive.org/details/assimilationinam0000gord |url-access=registration |place=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1964}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Robert A. |last=Grauman |date=1951 |title=Methods of studying the cultural assimilation of immigrants |publisher=University of London}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Kazal |first=R. A. |title=Revisiting Assimilation |journal=American Historical Society |volume=100 |date=April 1995}} | |||
* {{Cite book |first=Edward |last=Murguía |date=1975 |title=Assimilation, Colonialism, and the Mexican American People |publisher=Center for Mexican American Studies |place=University of Texas at Austin |ref=124 pages |isbn=978-0-292-77520-6}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Zhou |first=Min |title=Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation |journal=International Migration Review |volume=31 |issue=4, Special Issue: Immigrant Adaptation and Native–Born Responses in the Making of Americans |pages=975–1008 |date=Winter 1997 |doi=10.1177/019791839703100408 |pmid=12293212 |s2cid=20588618}} | |||
* {{cite book |author1=Zhou, Min |author2-link=Carl L. Bankston |author2=Carl L. Bankston |volume=III |title=Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States |place=New York |publisher=Russell Sage Foundation |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-87154-995-2 |title-link=Growing Up American |author1-link=Min Zhou}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
==External links== | |||
] | |||
{{wikiquote}} | |||
] | |||
{{Commons category}} | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Cultural assimilation|state=expanded}} | |||
] | |||
{{Culture}} | |||
] | |||
{{Ethnicity}} | |||
] | |||
{{Discrimination}} | |||
] | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Cultural Assimilation}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 01:28, 5 December 2024
Adoption of features of another culture
Part of a series on |
Immigration |
---|
General |
History and law |
Social processes |
Political theories |
Opposition and reform |
Causes |
Cultural assimilation is the process in which a minority group or culture comes to resemble a society's majority group or assimilates the values, behaviors, and beliefs of another group whether fully or partially.
The different types of cultural assimilation include full assimilation and forced assimilation. Full assimilation is the more prevalent of the two, as it occurs spontaneously. When used as a political ideology, assimilationism refers to governmental policies of deliberately assimilating ethnic groups into the national culture.
During cultural assimilation, minority groups are expected to adapt to the everyday practices of the dominant culture through language and appearance as well as via more significant socioeconomic factors such as absorption into the local cultural and employment communities.
Some types of cultural assimilation resemble acculturation in which a minority group or culture completely assimilates into the dominant culture in which defining characteristics of the minority culture are less obverse or outright disappear; while in other types of cultural assimilation such as cultural integration mostly found in multicultural communities, a minority group within a given society adopts aspects of the dominant culture through either cultural diffusion or for practical reason like adapting to another society's social norms while retaining their original culture. A conceptualization describes cultural assimilation as similar to acculturation while another merely considers the former as one of the latter's phases. Throughout history there have been different forms of cultural assimilation examples of types of acculturation include voluntary and involuntary assimilation.
Assimilation could also involve the so-called additive acculturation wherein, instead of replacing the ancestral culture, an individual expands their existing cultural repertoire.
Overview
Cultural assimilation may involve either a quick or a gradual change depending on the circumstances of the group. Full assimilation occurs when members of a society become indistinguishable from those of the dominant group in society.
Whether a given group should assimilate is often disputed by both members of the group and others in society. Cultural assimilation does not guarantee social alikeness. Geographical and other natural barriers between cultures, even if created by the predominant culture, may be culturally different. Cultural assimilation can happen either spontaneously or forcibly, the latter when more dominant cultures use various means aimed at forced assimilation.
Various types of assimilation, including forced cultural assimilation, are particularly relevant regarding Indigenous groups during colonialism taking place between the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. This type of assimilation included religious conversion, separation of families, changes of gender roles, division of property among foreign power, elimination of local economies, and lack of sustainable food supply. Whether via colonialism or within one nation, methods of forced assimilation are often unsustainable, leading to revolts and collapses of power to maintain control over cultural norms. Often, cultures that are forced into different cultural practices through forced cultural assimilation revert to their native practices and religions that differ from the forced cultural values of other dominant powers. In addition throughout history, voluntary assimilation is often in response to pressure from a more predominant culture, and conformity is a solution for people to remain in safety. An example of voluntary cultural assimilation would be during the Spanish Inquisition, when Jews and Muslims accepted the Roman Catholic Church as their religion, but meanwhile, many people still privately practised their traditional religions. That type of assimilation is used to convince a dominant power that a culture has peacefully assimilated yet often voluntary assimilation does not mean the group fully conforms to the accepted cultural beliefs.
The term "assimilation" is often used about not only indigenous groups but also immigrants settled in a new land. A new culture and new attitudes toward the original culture are obtained through contact and communication. Assimilation assumes that a relatively-tenuous culture gets to be united into one unified culture. That process happens through contact and accommodation between each culture. The current definition of assimilation is usually used to refer to immigrants, but in multiculturalism, cultural assimilation can happen all over the world and within varying social contexts and is not limited to specific areas.
Immigrant assimilation
Social scientists rely on four primary benchmarks to assess immigrant assimilation: socioeconomic status, geographic distribution, second language attainment, and intermarriage. William A.V. Clark defines immigrant assimilation in the United States as "a way of understanding the social dynamics of American society and that it is the process that occurs spontaneously and often unintended in the course of interaction between majority and minority groups."
Studies have also noted the positive effects of immigrant assimilation. A study by Bleakley and Chin (2010) found that people who arrived in the US at or before the age of nine from non-English speaking countries tend to speak English at a similar level as those from English speaking countries. Conversely, those who arrived after nine from non–English speaking countries have much lower speaking proficiency and this increases linearly with age at arrival. The study also noted sociocultural impacts such as those with better English skills are less likely to be currently married, more likely to divorce, have fewer children, and have spouses closer to their age. Learning to speak English well is estimated to improve income by over 33 percent. A 2014 study done by Verkuyten found that immigrant children who adapt through integration or assimilation are received more positively by their peers than those who adapt through marginalization or separation.
Perspective of dominant culture
Main article: Dominant cultureThere has been little to no existing research or evidence that demonstrates whether and how immigrant's mobility gains—assimilating to a dominant country such as language ability, socioeconomic status etc.— causes changes in the perception of those who were born in the dominant country. This essential type of research provides information on how immigrants are accepted into dominant countries. In an article by Ariela Schachter, titled "From "different" to "similar": an experimental approach to understanding assimilation", a survey was taken of white American citizens to view their perception of immigrants who now resided in the United States. The survey indicated the whites tolerated immigrants in their home country. White natives are open to having "structural" relation with the immigrants-origin individuals, for instance, friends and neighbors; however, this was with the exception of black immigrants and natives and undocumented immigrants. However, at the same time, white Americans viewed all non-white Americans, regardless of legal status, as dissimilar.
A similar journal by Jens Hainmueller and Daniel J. Hopkins titled "The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants" confirmed similar attitudes towards immigrants. The researchers used an experiment to reach their goal which was to test nine theoretical relevant attributes of hypothetical immigrants. Asking a population-based sample of U.S. citizens to decide between pairs of immigrants applying for admission to the United States, the U.S. citizen would see an application with information for two immigrants including notes about their education status, country, origin, and other attributes. The results showed Americans viewed educated immigrants in high-status jobs favourably, whereas they view the following groups unfavourably: those who lack plans to work, those who entered without authorization, those who are not fluent in English and those of Iraqi descent.
Adaptation to new country
As the number of international students entering the US has increased, so has the number of international students in US colleges and universities. The adaptation of these newcomers is important in cross-cultural research. In the study "Cross-Cultural Adaptation of International College Student in the United States" by Yikang Wang, the goal was to examine how the psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of international college students varied over time. The survey contained a sample of 169 international students attending a coeducational public university. The two subtypes of adaptation: psychological and socio-cultural were examined. Psychological adaptation refers to "feelings of well-being or satisfaction during cross-cultural transitions;" while socio-cultural refers to the ability to fit into the new culture. The results for both graduate and undergraduate students show both satisfaction and socio-cultural skills changed over time. Psychological adaptation had the most significant change for a student who has resided in the US for at least 24 months while socio-cultural adaptation steadily increased over time. It can be concluded that eventually over time, the minority group will shed some of their culture's characteristic when in a new country and incorporate new culture qualities. Also, it was confirmed that more time spent in a new country would result in becoming more accustomed to the dominant countries' characteristics.
Figure 2 demonstrates as the length of time resided in the United States increase—the dominant country, the life satisfaction and socio-cultural skill increase as well—positive correlation.
In turn, research by Caligiuri's group, published in 2020, shows that one semester of classroom experiential activities designed to foster international and domestic student social interaction serve to foster international students’ sense of belonging and social support.
In a study by Viola Angelini, "Life Satisfaction of Immigrant: Does cultural assimilation matter?", the theory of assimilation as having benefits for well-being. The goal of this study was to assess the difference between cultural assimilation and the subjective well-being of immigrants. The journal included a study that examined a "direct measure of assimilation with a host culture and immigrants' subjective well-being." Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, it was concluded that there was a positive correlation between cultural assimilation and an immigrant's life's satisfaction/wellbeing even after discarding factors such as employment status, wages, etc. "Life Satisfaction of Immigrant: Does cultural assimilation matter?" also confirms "association with life satisfaction is stronger for established immigrants than for recent ones." It was found that the more immigrants that identified with the German culture and who spoke the fluent national language—dominant country language, the more they reported to be satisfied with their lives. Life satisfaction rates were higher for those who had assimilated to the dominant country than those who had not assimilated since those who did incorporate the dominant language, religion, psychological aspects, etc.
Willingness to assimilate and cultural shock
Further information: Culture shockIn the study "Examination of cultural shock, intercultural sensitivity and willingness to adopt" by Clare D’Souza, the study uses a diary method to analyze the data collected. The study involved students undergoing a study abroad tour. The results show negative intercultural sensitivity is much greater in participants who experience "culture shock." Those who experience culture shock have emotional expression and responses of hostility, anger, negativity, anxiety frustration, isolation, and regression. Also, for one who has traveled to the country before permanently moving, they would have predetermined beliefs about the culture and their status within the country. The emotional expression for this individual includes excitement, happiness, eagerness, and euphoria.
Another article titled "International Students from Melbourne Describing Their Cross-Cultural Transitions Experiences: Culture Shock, Social Interaction, and Friendship Development" by Nish Belford focuses on cultural shock. Belford interviewed international students to explore their experience after living and studying in Melbourne, Australia. The data collected were narratives from the students that focused on variables such as "cultural similarity, intercultural communication competence, intercultural friendship, and relational identity to influence their experiences."
United States
Further information: Americanization (immigration)Between 1880 and 1920, the United States took in roughly 24 million immigrants. This increase in immigration can be attributed to many historical changes. The beginning of the 21st century has also marked a massive era of immigration, and sociologists are once again trying to make sense of the impacts that immigration has on society and on the immigrants themselves.
Assimilation had various meanings in American sociology. Henry Pratt Fairchild associates American assimilation with Americanization or the "melting pot" theory. Some scholars also believed that assimilation and acculturation were synonymous. According to a common point of view, assimilation is a "process of interpretation and fusion" from another group or person. That may include memories, behaviors, and sentiments. By sharing their experiences and histories, they blend into the common cultural life. A related theory is structural pluralism proposed by American sociologist Milton Gordon. It describes the American situation wherein despite the cultural assimilation of ethnic groups to mainstream American society, they maintained structural separation. Gordon maintained that there is limited integration of the immigrants into American social institutions such as educational, occupational, political, and social cliques.
During The Colonial Period from 1607 to 1776, individuals immigrated to the British colonies on two very different paths—voluntary and forced migration. Those who migrated to the colonies on their own volition were drawn by the allure of cheap land, high wages, and the freedom of conscience in British North America. On the latter half, the largest population of forced migrants to the colonies was African slaves. Slavery was different from the other forced migrations as, unlike in the case of convicts, there was no possibility of earning freedom, although some slaves were manumitted in the centuries before the American Civil War. The long history of immigration in the established gateways means that the place of immigrants in terms of class, racial, and ethnic hierarchies in the traditional gateways is more structured or established, but on the other hand, the new gateways do not have much immigration history and so the place of immigrants in terms of class, racial, and ethnic hierarchies are less defined, and immigrants may have more influence to define their position. Secondly, the size of the new gateways may influence immigrant assimilation. Having a smaller gateway may influence the level of racial segregation among immigrants and native-born people. Thirdly, the difference in institutional arrangements may influence immigrant assimilation. Traditional gateways, unlike new gateways, have many institutions set up to help immigrants such as legal aid, bureaus, and social organizations. Finally, Waters and Jimenez have only speculated that those differences may influence immigrant assimilation and the way researchers that should assess immigrant assimilation.
Furthermore, the advancement and integration of immigrants into the United States has accounted for 29% of U.S. population growth since 2000. Recent arrival of immigrants to the United States has been examined closely over the last two decades. The results show the driving factors for immigration including citizenship, homeownership, English language proficiency, job status, and earning a better income.
Canada
Canada's multicultural history dates back to the period European colonization from the 16th to 19th centuries, with waves of ethnic European emigration to the region. In the 20th century, Indian, Chinese and Japanese were the largest immigrant groups.
20th century–present: Shift from assimilation to integration
Canada remains one of the largest immigrant populations in the world. The 2016 census recorded 7.5 million documented immigrants, representing a fifth of the country's total population. Focus has shifted from a rhetoric of cultural assimilation to cultural integration. In contrast to assimilationism, integration aims to preserve the roots of a minority society while still allowing for smooth coexistence with the dominant culture.
Indigenous assimilation
Australia
Further information: Aboriginal Australians, New Deal for Aborigines, and Stolen GenerationsLegislation applying the policy of "protection" over Aboriginal Australians (separating them from white society) was adopted in some states and territories of Australia when they were still colonies, before the federation of Australia: in the Victoria in 1867, Western Australia in 1886, and Queensland in 1897. After federation, New South Wales crafted their policy in 1909, South Australia and the Northern Territory (which was under the control and of South Australia at the time) in 1910–11. Mission stations missions and Government-run Aboriginal reserves were created, and Aboriginal people moved onto them. Legislation restricted their movement, prohibited alcohol use and regulated employment. The policies were reinforced in the first half of the 20th century (when it was realized that Aboriginal people would not die out or be fully absorbed in white society) such as in the provisions of the Welfare Ordinance 1953, in which Aboriginal people were made wards of the state. "Part-Aboriginal" (known as half-caste) children were forcibly removed from their parents in order to educate them in European ways; the girls were often trained to be domestic servants. The protectionist policies were discontinued, and assimilationist policies took over. These proposed that "full-blood" Indigenous Australians should be allowed to “die out”, while "half-castes" were encouraged to assimilate into the white community. Indigenous people were regarded as inferior to white people by these policies, and often experienced discrimination in the predominantly white towns after having to move to seek work.
Between 1910 and 1970, several generations of Indigenous children were removed from their parents, and have become known as the Stolen Generations. The policy has done lasting damage to individuals, family and Indigenous culture.
The New Deal for Aborigines announced in 1939 marked the end of official policies based around "biological absorption" or "elimination" of Indigenous peoples, replaced with cultural assimilation as a prerequisite for civil rights. The 1961 Native Welfare Conference in Canberra, Australian federal and state government ministers formulated an official definition of "assimilation" of Indigenous Australians for government contexts. Federal territories minister Paul Hasluck informed the House of Representatives in April 1961 that:
The policy of assimilation means in the view of all Australian governments that all aborigines and part-aborigines are expected eventually to attain the same manner of living as other Australians and to live as members of a single Australian community enjoying the same rights and privileges, accepting the same responsibilities, observing the same customs and influenced by the same beliefs, hopes and loyalties as other Australians. Thus, any special measures taken for aborigines and part-aborigines are regarded as temporary measures not based on colour but intended to meet their need for special care and assistance to protect them from any ill effects of sudden change and to assist them to make the transition from one stage to another in such a way as will be favourable to their future social, economic and political advancement.
Brazil
In January 2019, the newly elected Brazil President Jair Bolsonaro stripped the Indigenous Affairs Agency FUNAI of the responsibility to identify and demarcate Indigenous lands. He argued that those territories have very tiny isolated populations and proposed to integrate them into the larger Brazilian society. According to the Survival International, "Taking responsibility for Indigenous land demarcation away from FUNAI, the Indian affairs department, and giving it to the Agriculture Ministry is virtually a declaration of open warfare against Brazil’s tribal peoples."
Canada 1800s–1990s: Forced assimilation
During the 19th and 20th centuries, and continuing until 1996, when the last Canadian Indian residential school was closed, the Canadian government, aided by Christian Churches, began an assimilationist campaign to forcibly assimilate Indigenous peoples in Canada. The government consolidated power over Indigenous land through treaties and the use of force, eventually isolating most Indigenous peoples to reserves. Marriage practices and spiritual ceremonies were banned, and spiritual leaders were imprisoned. Additionally, the Canadian government instituted an extensive residential school system to assimilate children. Indigenous children were separated from their families and no longer permitted to express their culture at these new schools. They were not allowed to speak their language or practice their own traditions without receiving punishment. There were many cases of violence and sexual abuse committed by the Christian church. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada concluded that this effort amounted to cultural genocide. The schools actively worked to alienate children from their cultural roots. Students were prohibited from speaking their native languages, were regularly abused, and were arranged marriages by the government after their graduation. The explicit goal of the Canadian government, through the Catholic and Anglican churches, was to completely assimilate Indigenous peoples into broader Canadian society and destroy all traces of their native history.
Croatia and Transylvania
During Croatia’s personal union with Hungary, ethnic Croatians were pressured to abandon their traditional customs in favor of adopting elements of Hungarian culture, such as Catholicism and the Latin alphabet. Because of this, elements of Hungarian culture were considered part of Croatian culture, and can still be seen in modern Croatian culture.
Throughout the Kingdom of Hungary, many citizens, primarily those who belonged to minority groups, were forced to convert to Catholicism. The forced conversion policy was harshest in Croatia and Transylvania, where civilians could be sent to prison for refusing to convert. Romanian cultural anthropologist Ioan Lupaș claims that between 1002, when Transylvania became part of the Kingdom of Hungary, to 1300, approximately 200,000 non-Hungarians living in Transylvania were jailed for resisting Catholic conversion, and about 50,000 of them died in prison.
Mexico and Peru
A major contributor to cultural assimilation in South America began during exploration and colonialism that often is thought by Bartolomé de Las Casas to begin in 1492 when Europeans began to explore the Atlantic in search of "the Indies", leading to the discovery of the Americas. Europe remained dominant over the Americas' Indigenous populations as resources such as labor, natural resources i.e. lumber, copper, gold, silver, and agricultural products flooded into Europe, yet these gains were one-sided, as Indigenous groups did not benefit from trade deals with colonial powers. In addition to this, colonial metropoles such as Portugal and Spain required that colonies in South America assimilate to European customs – such as following the Holy Roman Catholic Church, acceptance of Spanish or Portuguese over Indigenous languages and accepting European-style government.
Through forceful assimilationist policies, colonial powers such as Spain used methods of violence to assert cultural dominance over Indigenous populations. One example occurred in 1519 when the Spanish explorer Hernán Cortés reached Tenochtitlán – the original capital of the Aztec Empire in Mexico. After discovering that the Aztecs practiced human sacrifice, Cortés killed high-ranked Aztecs and held Moctezuma II, the Aztec ruler, captive. Shortly after, Cortés began creating alliances to resume power in Tenochtitlán and renamed it Mexico City. Without taking away power through murder and spread of infectious diseases the Spanish conquistadores (relatively small in number) would not have been able to take over Mexico and convert many people to Catholicism and slavery. While Spaniards influenced linguistic and religious cultural assimilation among Indigenous peoples in South America during colonialism, many Indigenous languages such as the Incan language Quechua are still used in places such as Peru to this day by at least 4 million people.
New Zealand
In the course of the colonization of New Zealand from the late-18th century onwards, assimilation of the indigenous Maori population to the culture of incoming European visitors and settlers at first occurred spontaneously. Genetic assimilation commenced early and continued – the 1961 New Zealand census classified only 62.2% of Māori as "full-blood Maoris". (Compare Pākehā Māori.) Linguistic assimilation also occurred early and ongoingly: European settler populations adopted and adapted Māori words, while European languages affected Māori vocabulary (and possibly phonology).
In the 19th century colonial governments de facto encouraged assimilationist policies; by the late-20th century, policies favored bicultural development. Māori readily and early adopted some aspects of European-borne material culture (metals, muskets, potatoes) relatively rapidly. Imported ideas – such as writing, Christianity, monarchy, sectarianism, everyday European-style clothing, or disapproval of slavery – spread more slowly. Later developments (socialism, anti-colonialist theory, New Age ideas) have proven more internationally mobile. One long-standing view presents Māori communalism as unassimilated with European-style individualism.
See also
- Acculturation
- Code-switching
- Conformity
- Cultural agility
- Cultural amalgamation
- Cultural appropriation
- Cultural genocide
- Cultural imperialism
- Deindividuation
- Diaspora politics
- Durham Report
- Enculturation
- Ethnic interest group
- Ethnic relations
- Ethnocide
- Forced assimilation
- Forced conversion
- Globalization
- Hegemony
- Immigrant-host model
- Immigration and crime
- Indigenization
- Intercultural communication
- Intercultural competence
- Language death
- Language shift
- Leitkultur
- Melting Pot
- Nationalism
- Parallel society
- Patriotism
- Political correctness
- Racial integration
- Racial segregation
- Recuperation (politics)
- Religious assimilation
- Respectability politics
- Social integration
- Sociology of race and ethnic relations
- Sovietization
Culture-specific:
- Americanization (of Native Americans)
- Anglicisation
- Arabization
- Stolen Generations (of Australian Aborigines)
- Christianization
- Croatisation
- Francization
- Germanization
- Hellenization
- Hispanicization
- "More Irish than the Irish themselves"
- Indianisation
- Islamification
- Italianization
- Japanization
- Javanisation
- Jewish assimilation
- Lithuanization
- Magyarization
- Malayisation
- Norwegianization
- Polonization
- Russification
- Romanianization
- Romanization
- Sanskritisation
- Serbianisation
- Sinicization
- Slavicisation
- Slovakization
- Swedification
- Ukrainization
- Thaification
- Turkification
- Vietnamization (cultural)
References
- ^ Spielberger, Charles (2004). Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. New York: Academic Press. pp. 615. ISBN 9780126574104.
- ^ "Cultural Assimilation" (PDF).
- "assimilationism". Dictionary.com. Rock Holdings.
- "Cultural Assimilation".
- ^ Abe, David K. (2017-07-19). Rural Isolation and Dual Cultural Existence: The Japanese-American Kona Coffee Community. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 17–18. ISBN 9783319553023.
- Carter, Prudence L. (2005-09-15). Keepin' It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199883387.
- ^ "assimilation | Definition, History, & Facts". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-05-28.
- ^ Waters, Mary C.; Jiménez, Tomás R. (2005). "Assessing Immigrant Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges". Annual Review of Sociology. 31 (1): 105–125. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100026. S2CID 9815854.
- Clark, W. (2003). Immigrants and the American Dream: Remaking the Middle Class. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-57230-880-0.
- Bleakley, Hoyt; Chin, Aimee (May 2004). "Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from Childhood Immigrants*". Review of Economics and Statistics. 86 (2): 481–496. doi:10.1162/003465304323031067. ISSN 0034-6535. S2CID 18694108.
- ^ Schachter, Ariela (1 October 2016). "From "Different" to "Similar": An Experimental Approach to Understanding Assimilation". American Sociological Review. 81 (5): 981–1013. doi:10.1177/0003122416659248. ISSN 0003-1224. S2CID 151621019.
- Hainmueller, Jens; Hopkins, Daniel J. (2015). "The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants". American Journal of Political Science. 59 (3): 529–548. doi:10.1111/ajps.12138. ISSN 0092-5853. JSTOR 24583081.
- ^ Wang, Yikang; Li, Ting; Noltemeyer, Amity; Wang, Aimin; Zhang, Jinghua; Shaw, Kevin (2017-11-30). "Cross-Cultural Adaptation of International College Students in the United States". Journal of International Students. 8 (2): 821–842. doi:10.32674/jis.v8i2.116. ISSN 2162-3104.
- ^ Ward, Colleen A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock. Bochner, Stephen., Furnham, Adrian. (2nd ed.). Hove, East Sussex: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415162340. OCLC 44927055.
- Caligiuri, Paula; DuBois, Cathy L.Z.; Lundby, Kyle; Sinclair, Elizabeth A (2020-12-01). "Fostering international students' sense of belonging and perceived social support through a semester-long experiential activity". Research in Comparative and International Education. 15 (4): 357–370. doi:10.1177/1745499920954311. ISSN 1745-4999. S2CID 225001702.
- ^ Angelini, Viola; Casi, Laura; Corazzini, Luca (1 July 2015). "Life satisfaction of immigrants: does cultural assimilation matter?" (PDF). Journal of Population Economics. 28 (3): 817–844. doi:10.1007/s00148-015-0552-1. ISSN 1432-1475. S2CID 9417180.
- ^ D’Souza, Clare; Halimi, Tariq; Singaraju, Stephen; Sillivan Mort, Gillian (2016-09-21). "Examination of cultural shock, intercultural sensitivity and willingness to adapt". Education + Training. 58 (9): 906–925. doi:10.1108/ET-09-2015-0087. ISSN 0040-0912.
- ^ Belford, Nish (2017). "International Students from Melbourne Describing Their Cross-Cultural Transitions Experiences: Culture Shock, Social Interaction, and Friendship Development". Journal of International Students. 7 (3): 499–521. doi:10.32674/jis.v7i3.206. ISSN 2162-3104.
- "Assimilation facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Assimilation". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2016-11-11.
- Anderson, Shannon Latkin (2016). Immigration, Assimilation, and the Cultural Construction of American National Identity. New York: Routledge. p. 135. ISBN 9781138100411.
- Spickard, Paul (2007). Almost All Aliens: Immigration, Race, and Colonialism in American History and Identity. New York: Routledge. pp. 50–51.
- "An Overview of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade". Brewminate: A Bold Blend of News and Ideas. 2018-07-25. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
- "A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy from the Colonial Period to the Present Day". www.cato.org. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
- "Chapter 5: U.S. Foreign-Born Population Trends". Pew Research Center's Hispanic Trends Project. 2015-09-28. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
- "Assimilation Today". Center for American Progress. September 2010. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
- ^ Griffith, Andrew (2017-10-31). "Building a Mosaic: The Evolution of Canada's Approach to Immigrant Integration". migrationpolicy.org. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
- Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2017-10-25). "Immigrant population in Canada, 2016 Census of Population". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
- "Canadian Multiculturalism". lop.parl.ca. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
- ^ "A White Australia". Australians Together. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
- Australian Law Reform Commission (18 August 2010). "3. Aboriginal Societies: The Experience of Contact: Changing Policies Towards Aboriginal People". Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws. ALRC Report 31. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
- Northern Territory Administration. Welfare Branch (1959). "Annual Report 1958/59" (PDF). Retrieved 10 August 2020 – via AIATSIS.
- Hasluck, Paul (1961). "The Policy of Assimilation: Decisions of Commonwealth and Statement Ministers at the Native Welfare Conference, Canberra, January 26th and 27th, 1961" (PDF). Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer – via AIATSIS Library.
- "Brazil's new president makes it harder to define Indigenous lands". Global News. January 2, 2019.
- "President Bolsonaro 'declares war on Brazil's Indigenous peoples – Survival responds". Survival International. January 3, 2019.
- "Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2018.
- The Central European Observer – Joseph Hanč, F. Souček, Aleš Brož, Jaroslav Kraus, Stanislav V. Klíma – Google Books. December 1933. Retrieved 2024-07-09.
- Kostelj, Ivica (1998). Hrvatski arkivi: Zatvorski spisi od 1000. do 1500. godine [Croatian archives: Prison records from the years 1000 to 1500] (in Croatian). Zagreb, Croatia (published 24 October 1998).
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Lupaș, Ioan (1992). The Hungarian Policy of Magyarization. Romanian Cultural Foundation.
- "The American Yawp".
- "The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492".
- Gabbert, Wolfgang (2012). "The longue durée of Colonial Violence in Latin America". Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung. 37 (3 (141)): 254–275. ISSN 0172-6404. JSTOR 41636608.
- "The Spanish conquistadores and colonial empire (article)". Khan Academy. Retrieved 2020-05-28.
-
New Zealand. Department of Statistics (1962). Population Census, 1961. Vol. 10. p. 23. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
Full-blood Maoris totalled 103,987 , or 62 2 per cent of the Maori population as it is defined for the purposes of the census.
-
Thomason, Sarah Grey (2001). Language Contact. Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. Georgetown University Press. p. 135. ISBN 9780878408542. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
It is possible that, although older English loanwords were nativized into Maori phonology, newer loanwords are no longer being nativized, with the eventual result being a changed Maori phonological system.
-
Hoskins, Te Kawehau; McKinley, Elizabeth (2015). "New Zealand: Maori Education in Aotearoa". In Crossley, Michael; Hancock, Greg; Sprague, Terra (eds.). Education in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. Education Around the World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 159. ISBN 9781472503589. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
The gaping disparity in outcomes between indigenous Māori students and Pākehā (New Zealand Europeans) has its genesis in the colonial provision of education for Māori driven by a social policy of cultural assimilation and social stratification for over 100 years.
-
Hoskins, Te Kawehau; McKinley, Elizabeth (2015). "New Zealand: Maori Education in Aotearoa". In Crossley, Michael; Hancock, Greg; Sprague, Terra (eds.). Education in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. Education Around the World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 159. ISBN 9781472503589. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
From the 1970s, Maori activism across the social field has led to a formal social policy of biculturalism and iwi (tribes) positioned as partners with the state.
-
Neich, Roger (2001). Carved Histories: Rotorua Ngati Tarawhai Woodcarving. Auckland: Auckland University Press. p. 147. ISBN 9781869402570. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
The change from stone to metal tools occurred at different times in different areas of the North Island, depending on the amount of contact with European visitors. In the coastal areas this happened very early, starting with the metal obtained from Captain Cook's men and other eighteenth-century explorers such as Jean-Francois-Marie de Durville and Marion du Fresne, followed very soon after by the sealers and whalers. Away from the coasts, the first metals arrived later, in the early nineteenth century, usually as trade items brought by missionary explorers.
-
Smith, Ian (2019). "Sojourning settlers". Pākehā Settlements in a Māori World: New Zealand Archaeology 1769–1860. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books (published 2020). p. 129. ISBN 9780947492496. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
It appears that firearms were first acquired by Māori somewhere in the northern North Island about 1806 or 1807.
-
Harris, Warwick; Kapoor, Promila, eds. (1988). Nga Mahi Maori O Te Wao Nui a Tane: Contributions to an International Workshop on Ethnobotany, Te Rehua Marae, Christchurch, New Zealand, 22–26 February 1988. Botany Division, DSIR. p. 181. ISBN 9780477025799. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
The first record of potatoes being grown in New Zealand is dated 1769. The Maori community were quick to see the advantages the potato had over the kumara: its greater cold tolerance, better storage qualities and higher yields.
-
McKenzie, Donald Francis (1985). Oral Culture, Literacy & Print in early New Zealand: The Treaty of Waitangi. Wellington: Victoria University Press. p. 20. ISBN 9780864730435. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
In the early 1830s we see the hesitant beginnings of letter writing in written requests for baptism . The effective use of letters for political purposes was many years away. Nor did printing of itself become a re-expressive tool for the Maori until the late 1850s.
-
Crosby, Alfred W. (1986). Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Studies in Environment and History (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (published 2004). p. 246. ISBN 9781107394049. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
There were no Maori conversions up to 1825, and only a few - usually of the moribund - between 1825 and 1830.
-
King, Michael (2003). The Penguin History of New Zealand. ReadHowYouWant.com (published 2011). p. 286. ISBN 9781459623750. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
Traditional Maori clothing had gone out of general use by the 1850s (and much earlier in communities associated with whaling and trading and those close to European settlements), though it would still be donned, especially cloaks, for ceremonial occasions and cultural performances. As the European settler population had begun to swell in the 1840s, so European clothes, new and second-hand, had become widely available along with blankets, which had the advantage of being usable as clothing and/or bedding.
- Petrie, Hazel (2015). Outcasts of the Gods? The Struggle over Slavery in Maori New Zealand. Auckland University Press. ISBN 9781775587859. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
-
Stoddart-Smith, Carrie (2016). "Radical kaupapa Maori politics". In Godfery, Morgan (ed.). The Interregnum: Rethinking New Zealand. BWB Texts. Vol. 39. Bridget Williams Books. pp. 38–39. ISBN 9780947492656. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
different western ideas may complement the diverse perspectives of kaupapa Māori frameworks, but it would be an error to construe such ideas as essential to them. Many Māori drive a socialist agenda, for example, and although there are commonalities with some aspects of tikanga Māori, socialism as a political philosophy should not be seen to be implied by Māori narratives.
-
Buick-Constable, John (2005). "Indigenous State Relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A Contractual Approach to Self-determination". In Hocking, Barbara Ann (ed.). Unfinished Constitutional Business?: Rethinking Indigenous Self-determination. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780855754662. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
From the 1970s, in the wake of a changed international climate of human rights and anti-colonialism, Indigenous peoples around the world sought a reinvigoration of their Indigenous identity and a renewal of their Indigenous self-determination. Largely in tandem with these trends has been a renaissance of the theory and practice of contractualism . The history of Maori-Crown relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand is exemplary of this contractual approach in the struggles of Maori for self-determination historically and contemporaneously.
-
O'Regan, Tipene (2014). New Myths and Old Politics: The Waitangi Tribunal and the Challenge of Tradition. BWB Texts. Vol. 17. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books. ISBN 9781927131992. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
my Beaglehole Memorial Lecture of 1991 was delivered at a time when hearings of the Tribunal were becoming a battleground . Māoridom itself was experiencing a remarkable efflorescence of freshly reconstructed group identities and New Age-style incorporations into Māori ethnic identity. The Waitaha movement emanating from within contemporary Ngāi Tahu was one of these.
-
For example:
Ward, Alan (1974). "Myths and Realities". A Show of Justice: Racial 'amalgamation' in Nineteenth Century New Zealand. Auckland University Press (published 2013). ISBN 9781869405717. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
It is often said that Western individualism is in conflict with Polynesian communalism . It is hardly surprising that today Maori attitudes to the law appear more ambivalent than they did in the 1870s and 1880s.
Bibliography
- Alba, Richard D.; Nee, Victor (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream. Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01813-6.
- Armitage, Andrew (1995). Comparing the Policy of Aboriginal Assimilation: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. UBC Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-0459-2.
- Crispino, James A. (1980). The Assimilation of Ethnic Groups: The Italian Case. Center for Migration Studies. ISBN 978-0-913256-39-8.
- Drachsler, Julius (1920). Democracy and Assimilation: The Blending of Immigrant Heritages in America. Macmillan.
- Gordon, Milton M. Daedalus Yetman (ed.). "Assimilation in America: Theory and Reality". Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 90 (2). Boston, Mass.: 245–258.
- Gordon, Milton M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Grauman, Robert A. (1951). Methods of studying the cultural assimilation of immigrants. University of London.
- Kazal, R. A. (April 1995). "Revisiting Assimilation". American Historical Society. 100.
- Murguía, Edward (1975). Assimilation, Colonialism, and the Mexican American People. University of Texas at Austin: Center for Mexican American Studies. ISBN 978-0-292-77520-6.
- Zhou, Min (Winter 1997). "Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation". International Migration Review. 31 (4, Special Issue: Immigrant Adaptation and Native–Born Responses in the Making of Americans): 975–1008. doi:10.1177/019791839703100408. PMID 12293212. S2CID 20588618.
- Zhou, Min; Carl L. Bankston (1998). Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States. Vol. III. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN 978-0-87154-995-2.
External links
- Asian-Nation: Asian American Assimilation & Ethnic Identity
- From Paris to Cairo: Resistance of the Unacculturated
- Unity and Diversity in Multicultural Societies
Culture | |
---|---|
Outline | |
Sciences | |
Subfields |
|
Types |
|
Aspects |
|
Politics |
|
Religions | |
Related |
|
Ethnicity | |
---|---|
Concepts | |
Ethnology |
|
Groups by region | |
Identity and ethnogenesis |
|
Multiethnic society |
|
Ideology and ethnic conflict | |
Related |
Discrimination | |
---|---|
Forms | |
Attributes | |
Social |
|
Religious | |
Ethnic/National |
|
Manifestations |
|
Discriminatory policies |
|
Countermeasures |
|
Related topics |
|