Misplaced Pages

Anglosphere: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:31, 1 December 2007 edit66.222.228.170 (talk) Sources← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:07, 28 December 2024 edit undoTfdavisatsnetnet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,476 edits Core Anglosphere: Added AUKUS date 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Grouping of English-speaking nations}}
]
{{About|group of English-speaking nations with close political and military ties and their sphere of influence|usage of English worldwide|English-speaking world}}
]
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=October 2019}}
The word '''Anglosphere''' describes a group of ] (]-speaking) ] which share historical, political, and cultural characteristics rooted in or attributed to the historical experience of the ] (UK). The Anglosphere includes those former ] and ]s of the UK where English is the main language.
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}}


[[File:Anglosphere Map.svg|alt=Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Anglosphere_Geometry.svg|thumb|400x400px|The Anglosphere, according to James Bennett (''The Anglosphere Challenge'')<ref>Browning, Christopher S. and Tonra, Ben (2010) "Beyond the West and towards the Anglosphere?" In: Browning, Christopher S. and Lehti, Marko, (eds.) ''The struggle for the West: a divided and contested legacy''. Abingdon, Oxfordshire; New York: Routledge, pp. 161–181. {{ISBN|9780415476836}}: https://www.academia.edu/341929/Beyond_the_West_and_Towards_the_Anglosphere {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103143856/https://www.academia.edu/341929/Beyond_the_West_and_Towards_the_Anglosphere |date=3 January 2023 }}</ref>
The term is usually attributed to ] writer ], used in his ] novel '']''. Its first published use after this was in an article by ] entitled "Canada's World Advantage" which appeared in a Canadian newspaper, ''The ]'', on ] ] (page A16). The term "Anglophonie" is used rarely,<ref name="thisthisthis">{{Cite web
{{Legend|#333366|Core Anglosphere}}
| url=http://www.thisisthis.org/2005/07/comment-sappelle.html
{{Legend|#0083D7|Middle Anglosphere (states where English is one of several official languages, but not necessarily widely spoken by the native population)}}
| title=Comment S'Appelle?
{{Legend|#0099FF|Outer sphere (English-using states of other civilisations)}}
| accessdate=2007-07-24
{{Legend|#bdd3f9|Periphery (states where English is widely used but is not an official governmental language)}}]]
| author=Cliff
The '''Anglosphere''', also known as the '''Anglo-American world''',<ref>{{Cite book |last=Baylis |first=John |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=kH0oAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA92 |title=The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations |last2=Smith |first2=Steve |last3=Owens |first3=Patricia |date=2014 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-965617-2 |pages=92 |language=en}}</ref> is the ]-] ], with a core group of nations that today maintain close political, diplomatic and military co-operation. While the nations included in different sources vary, the Anglosphere is usually not considered to include all countries where ] is an official language, so it is not synonymous with the sphere of ]s, though commonly included nations are those that were formerly part of the ] and retained the English language and English ].
}}</ref><ref name="goliath">{{Cite web
| url=http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-5112169_ITM
| title=Britannia's Children: Migration from England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales since 1600.(Book Review)
| accessdate=2007-07-24
| author=Champion, C.P.
}}</ref> usually in contradistinction to ], but is more common in other languages.<ref name="stoll">{{Cite web
| url=http://www.fask.uni-mainz.de/inst/iaa/anglophonie/second/ikangloph.htm
| title=Anglophonie
| accessdate=2007-07-24
| author=Karl-Heinz Stoll
}}</ref><ref name="fabula">{{Cite web
| url=http://www.fabula.org/actualites/article16500.php
| title=Anglophonie, francophonie, camerounité
| accessdate=2007-07-24
}}</ref>


The five core countries of the Anglosphere are usually taken to be ], ], ], the ], and the ]. These countries enjoy close cultural and diplomatic links with one another and are aligned under military and security programmes such as ].
==Definitions==
The term incorporates ideas about ], ], ], ], ], and ], and its definition is necessarily loose.<ref>Stephenson, the originator of the term, did not use the term in any specific ] sense but rather to describe a fictional race called the Atlantans who, when immigrating to ], were "poor in equity but rich in expectations".</ref> It can mean just ], or it may mean all the nations which use ]. It can refer to ] and the British-settled countries where the original settler populations came mainly from the ]. It can also be seen as an expansion of ], a much older concept in ], to include ] nations such as ] and ]. It also fills a gap in the English vocabulary corresponding roughly to the ] phrase ''le monde Anglo-Saxon''. Thus, it could carry a wide variety of ]s.


== Definitions and variable geometry ==
According to Bennett, "the Anglosphere is not a club that a person or nation can join or be excluded from, but a condition or status on a network",<ref>, James C. Bennett, ''Albion's Seedlings'', November 21, 2005</ref> and
The Anglosphere is the Anglo-American sphere of influence.{{efn|"The Anglosphere – shorthand for the Anglo-American sphere of influence – established the concept and structure of the modern transnational community.... The Anglosphere (in the narrow sense of the former British Empire, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and the US) has been the architect and a staunch proponent of international norms."{{sfn|Davies et al. 2013}}}} The term was first coined by the science fiction writer ] in his book '']'', published in 1995. ] adopted the term in 2000 and defined it as including English-speaking countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, ], and the ].{{sfn|Lloyd|2000}} ] defines ''anglosphere'' as "the English-speaking Common Law-based nations of the world",{{sfn|Bennett, 2004b|pp=3,67}} arguing that former British colonies that retained English common law and the English language have done significantly better than counterparts colonised by other European powers.{{sfn|Bennett|2007|pp=42-43}} The ] dictionary defines the Anglosphere as "the countries of the world in which the English language and cultural values predominate".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Merriam-Webster Staff |year=2010 |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anglosphere |chapter=Anglosphere |title=Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary |access-date=7 March 2010 |archive-date=11 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111200838/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Anglosphere |url-status=live }}</ref>{{efn|"The group of countries where ] is the main native language." ({{ShorterOxfordEnglishDictionary}}).}} However the Anglosphere is usually not considered to include all countries where English is an official language, so it is not synonymous with ].<ref name=":7">{{cite web|url=https://www.britac.ac.uk/events/anglosphere-and-its-others-english-speaking-peoples-changing-world-order|title=The Anglosphere and its Others: The 'English-speaking Peoples' in a Changing World Order – British Academy|website=British Academy|access-date=26 January 2018|archive-date=22 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170422231724/https://www.britac.ac.uk/events/anglosphere-and-its-others-english-speaking-peoples-changing-world-order|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Better source needed|This source does not make that point, and could be read, on one interpretation, as contradicting it. Also the source is merely a summary of a forthcoming conference.|date=July 2024}}
:... as a network civilization ... without a corresponding political form, has necessarily imprecise boundaries. Geographically, the densest nodes of the Anglosphere are found in the United States and the United Kingdom, while ] regions of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, ], and ] are powerful and populous outliers. The educated English-speaking populations of the ], ], ] and ] pertain to the Anglosphere to various degrees.<ref name="anglosphereinstitute">, James C. Bennett, 24 July 2003</ref>


===Core Anglosphere===
Historian ] has also promoted the concept.<ref>, Andrew Brown, ''The Guardian'', February 15, 2003</ref> John Ibbitson of the Canadian newspaper '']'' identified five core English-speaking countries with common sociopolitical heritage and goals: ], ], ], the ], and the ]. Writer ], who uses the term often, takes it to denote the nations that were or have been part of the ] for a significant period of time, and thus were heavily subject to British political influence: ], ], the ] and the ] at the core, then ], ], and ], and finally outliers like ] and ].<ref>, Mark Steyn, ''Macleans'', February 10, 2006</ref><ref>, Mark Steyn, ''Western Standard'', June 5, 2006</ref>
The definition is usually taken to include Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/anglosphere-past-present-and-future|title=The Anglosphere: Past, present and future|website=The British Academy}}</ref> in a grouping of ] called the ''core Anglosphere''. The term Anglosphere can also more widely encompass ], ] and the ] countries.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ft.com/content/dca3f034-bfe8-4f21-bcdc-2b274053f0b5 |title=The Anglosphere needs to learn to love apartment living |last=Burn-Murdoch |first=John |date=17 March 2023 |website=Financial Times |publisher= |language= |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |quote=Forty years ago, the UK, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland had roughly 400 homes per 1,000 residents, level with developed continental European countries. Since then the two groups have diverged, the Anglosphere standing still while western Europe has pulled clear to 560 per 1,000.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ft.com/content/c6bb7307-484c-4076-a0f3-fc2aeb0b6112 |title=The Anglosphere has an advantage on immigration |last=Burn-Murdoch |first=John |date=25 April 2024 |website=Financial Times |publisher= |language= |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |quote=But a striking pattern emerges when you look at where these different impacts are clustered: almost everything looks better in Anglophone countries. Immigrants and their offspring in the UK, US and so on tend to be more skilled, have better jobs and often out-earn the native-born, while those in continental Europe fare worse. In terms of the fiscal impact, immigrants pay more in than they get out in the US, UK, Australia and Ireland, but are net recipients in Belgium, France, Sweden and the Netherlands.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-state-of-the-anglosphere |title=The State of the Anglosphere |author= Shashi Parulekar and Joel Kotkin |date=2012 |website=City Journal |publisher= |language= |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |quote=Particularly citizens of what some call the Anglosphere: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/03/the-guardian-view-on-languages-and-the-british-brexit-and-an-anglosphere-prison |title=The Guardian view on languages and the British: Brexit and an Anglosphere prison |last=Reed |first=Betsy |date=3 November 2017 |website=The Guardian |publisher= |language= |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |quote=an Anglosphere of Britain, Ireland (sometimes), the British Commonwealth and above all the United States.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/f30b22d0-703f-11e4-bc6a-00144feabdc0 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/f30b22d0-703f-11e4-bc6a-00144feabdc0 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Which way is Ireland going?|website=Financial Times|date=21 November 2014|last1=Kuper|first1=Simon}}</ref>{{sfn|Lloyd|2000}}{{Excessive citations inline|date=July 2024}}


The five core countries in the Anglosphere are ] that maintain close cultural and diplomatic links with one another. They are aligned under such military and security programmes as:{{sfn|Bennett, 2004b|p=80}}{{sfn|Lloyd|2000}}{{sfn|Legrand|2015}}{{sfn|Legrand|2016}}
Lawrence M. Mead, Professor of Politics at ], provides a different definition. Rather than using the term "Anglosphere", he identifies "Anglo nations" such as Britain and the chief territories that were settled initially from Britain&mdash;pre-eminently the United States but also Australia, Canada and New Zealand. According to Mead: "What makes a country Anglo is that its original settler population came mainly from Britain." By this definition, India and South Africa are not "Anglo nations" because "British settlers never formed the bulk of their populations."<ref>, Lawrence Mead, ''The National Interest'', December 01, 2005</ref>
*]
*] (air forces)
*], a 2021 trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States focused on Australia acquiring nuclear-powered attack submarines
*] (navies)
*]
*] (communications electronics)
*] (intelligence)
*]
*]
*] (technology and science)
*The ] (signals intelligence).


Relations have traditionally been warm between Anglosphere countries, with bilateral partnerships such as those between ], ] and ] (the ]) constituting the most successful partnerships in the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.australianreview.net/journal/v2/n1/goff.pdf|title=The Trans-Tasman Relationship: A New Zealand Perspective|access-date=27 December 2017|archive-date=21 August 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060821235330/http://www.australianreview.net/journal/v2/n1/goff.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2016/03/09/us_and_canada_the_worlds_most_successful_bilateral_relationship_111753.html|title=U.S. and Canada: The World's Most Successful Bilateral Relationship|work=RealClearWorld|date=9 March 2016|access-date=27 December 2017|archive-date=28 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171228060417/https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2016/03/09/us_and_canada_the_worlds_most_successful_bilateral_relationship_111753.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Marsh|first=Steve|date=1 June 2012|title='Global Security: US–UK relations': lessons for the special relationship?|journal=Journal of Transatlantic Studies|volume=10|issue=2|pages=182–199|doi=10.1080/14794012.2012.678119|s2cid=145271477}}</ref>
==Advocacy==
A leading advocate of the importance for contemporary international relations of a concept of Anglosphere is ], founder of ]. His book ''The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century'' (ISBN 0-7425-3332-8), published in 2004, is an extended exposition of his version of the concept.


In terms of political systems, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have ] as ], form part of the ] and use the ] of government. Most of the core countries have ] electoral systems, though ] and ] have reformed their systems and there are other systems used in some ]. As a consequence, most core Anglosphere countries have politics ].
The ] book ''A History of the English Speaking Peoples since 1900'' specifically references Bennett's book and the Anglosphere, and promotes a "united we stand, divided we fall" ethos for the English-speaking world.


Below is a table comparing the five core countries of the Anglosphere (data for 2022/2023):
==Bonding qualities==
In a political context, the Anglosphere largely comprises the United Kingdom and some of its ], including prior and current members of the ]. These territories have many common features, most of which come from their shared history. These include:
*]-inspired democratic political institutions
*] ] (trial by judge and/or jury, etc)
*], ] ]
*the entire English-language corpus of literature, philosophy, poetry, and theatre, though this complements native cultural counterparts and innovations (e.g. Hollywood, Bollywood, Celtic culture) rather than supplants them.


{| {{Table|sort}}
Some exceptions obviously apply: for example, the United States, Ireland and South Africa have ] systems of government while the others have ]; ] and ] do not use Common Law, with ] and ] using hybrid systems, and so on.
!Country
!Population
!Land area<br />(km<sup>2</sup>)<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=FAOSTAT |url=https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data |access-date=2021-11-03 |website=www.fao.org |archive-date=12 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161112130804/https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data |url-status=live }}</ref>
!GDP Nominal<br />(USD bn)<ref name="auto1">{{Cite web |title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report |access-date=2023-06-28 |website=IMF |language=en}}</ref>
!GDP PPP<br />(USD bn)<ref name="auto1"/>
!GDP PPP per capita<br />(USD)<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=World Economic Outlook Database: October 2021 |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/October |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211012183649/https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/October |archive-date=12 October 2021 |access-date=2021-11-03 |website=IMF |language=en}}</ref>
!National wealth PPP (USD bn)<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-databook-2021.pdf|title=Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook 2021|access-date=13 July 2021|archive-date=23 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623101415/https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-databook-2021.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":5">Credit Suisse figures adjusted using IMF WEO Oct 2021 GDP-PPP exchange rates.</ref>
!Military spending PPP<br />(USD bn){{sfn|Robertson|2022}}
|-
| align="left" | {{flag|Australia}}
| 26,009,249<ref>{{cite web |title=Population clock |url=https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Web+Pages/Population+Clock?opendocument |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213101231/https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Web+Pages/Population+Clock?opendocument |archive-date=13 December 2019 |access-date=22 November 2019 |website=www.abs.gov.au |publisher=Australian Bureau of Statistics}}</ref>
| {{nts|7692020}}
|1,707
| style="text-align:center;" |{{nts|1,718}}
| 65,366
|{{nts|7661}}
|{{nts|22.0}}
|-
| align="left" | {{flag|Canada}}
| 38,708,793<ref>{{cite web |last=Government of Canada |first=Statistics Canada |date=11 July 2018 |title=Canada's population clock (real-time model) |url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2018005-eng.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219010134/https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2018005-eng.htm |archive-date=19 December 2019 |access-date=18 April 2020 |website=www150.statcan.gc.ca}}</ref>
|{{nts|9984670}}
|2,089
| style="text-align:center;" |{{nts|2,385}}
| 60,177
|{{nts|9971}}
|{{nts|23.3}}
|-
| align="left" | {{flag|New Zealand}}
| 5,130,623<ref>{{cite web |title=Population clock |url=http://archive.stats.govt.nz/tools_and_services/population_clock.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200221084629/http://archive.stats.govt.nz/tools_and_services/population_clock.aspx |archive-date=21 February 2020 |access-date=18 April 2020 |website=archive.stats.govt.nz}}</ref>
| {{nts|262443}}
|251
| style="text-align:center;" |{{nts|278}}
| 54,046
|{{nts|1229}}
|{{nts|3.1}}
|-
| align="left" | {{flag|United Kingdom}}
| 67,081,234<ref>{{cite web |title=Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2020 |url=https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2020#age-structure-of-the-uk-population |access-date=25 June 2021 |website=www.ons.gov.uk |archive-date=25 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210625084416/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2020#age-structure-of-the-uk-population |url-status=live }}</ref>
| {{nts|241930}}
|3,158
| style="text-align:center;" |{{nts|3,846}}
|56,471
|{{nts|16208}}
|{{nts|70.2}}
|-
| align="left" | {{flag|United States}}
| 332,718,707<ref name="auto">{{cite web |title=Population Clock |url=https://www.census.gov/popclock/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117025617/http://www.census.gov/popclock/ |archive-date=17 November 2015 |access-date=18 April 2020 |website=www.census.gov}}</ref>
| {{nts|9833520}}
|26,854
| style="text-align:center;" |{{nts|26,854}}
|80,035
|{{nts|114932}}
|{{nts|734.3}}
|-
! align="left" |Core Anglosphere
! {{nts|469648606}}
! {{nts|27329350}}
!34,059
! {{nts|28115}}
!{{nts|65700}}
!{{nts|150001}}
!{{nts|852.9}}
|-
!... as % of World
!5.9%
!18.4%
!32.3%
!20%
!3.3×
!24.9%
!32.9%
|}


== Culture and economics ==
The Anglosphere nations also share other similarities, including traditional and established ] and personal ]. These make the Anglosphere different from other English-speaking international groups, notably the ]. Bennett writes:
Due to their historic links, the Anglosphere countries share many cultural traits that still persist today. Most countries in the Anglosphere follow the ] through ] rather than ], and favour ] with ]s above other political systems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/|title=The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency|website=www.cia.gov|access-date=2019-10-29|archive-date=10 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510200259/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Private property is protected by law or constitution.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|url=https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Office%20of%20Citizenship/TaskForceonNewAmericansReport.pdf|title=Building an Americanization Movement for the Twenty-first Century: A Report to the President of the United States from the Task Force on New Americans|author=Michael Chertoff|display-authors=etal|year=2008|isbn=978-0-16-082095-3|location=Washington D.C.|access-date=29 October 2019|archive-date=4 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200704193841/https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Office%20of%20Citizenship/TaskForceonNewAmericansReport.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=January 2024}}
<blockquote> ''Anglospherism is assuredly not the ] ]ism dating from the era around 1900, nor the sentimental attachment of the ]n ] of the decades before and after ].... Anglo-Saxonism relied on underlying assumptions of an Anglo-Saxon race, and sought to unite racial "cousins." ... Anglospherism is based on the intellectual understanding of the roots of both successful ] and ] in strong ].<ref name="anglosphereinstitute" /></blockquote>


] is high in the five core Anglosphere countries, as all five share the ] &ndash; a ] model that emerged in the 1970s based on the ] with origins from the 18th century United Kingdom.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Development models, globalization and economies : a search for the Holy Grail?|author=Kidd, John B.|author2=Richter, Frank-Jürgen|publisher=Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan|year=2006|isbn=978-0230523555|oclc=71339998}}</ref> The shared sense of ] led cities such as ], ], ], ], and ] to have considerable impacts on the international markets and the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.atkearney.com/global-cities/2019|title=Global Cities Index 2019|website=A.T. Kearney|access-date=29 October 2019|archive-date=20 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191220120959/https://www.atkearney.com/global-cities/2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Global ] has been highly influenced by the ] and the ].<ref name=":2" />{{better source needed|date=January 2024}}
==Anglosphere co-operation and common ground==
The group of nations have a history of co-operation and close political ties. A network of varying ]s as well as intelligence arrangements (such as the ] which runs ], or the ] agreement) exists between the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and some are in ]s with each other. The countries of the Anglosphere were military allies in major world conflicts in the ], most importantly ], ], and the ]. The US, the UK, and Australia co-operated in the ], while other ] allies of the United States did not participate.


==Proponents and critics==
On the other hand, the group is in no sense a bloc. During the 1950s and 1960s the ] and ] caused divisions on how to approach regional conflicts. Common ground has not always been attainable between the Anglosphere members. During the 1980s New Zealand adopted an anti-nuclear policy, and declared a ] around the country. Visiting United States warships that would not confirm or deny the presence of ] were thus banned from entering New Zealand ports. This led to a period of ] of New Zealand, an ally in previous conflicts.
Proponents of the Anglosphere concept typically come from the ] (such as ] of the ]), and critics from the ] (for example ] of the ]).


===Proponents===
Polls have shown that most citizens of Anglosphere nations regard other Anglosphere countries as their closest "friends and allies". The United Kingdom, Australia and Canada are usually named as the United States' closest friends and allies, while the other nations routinely list the US and the UK at the top of their lists.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
As early as 1897, ] proposed an Anglo-Saxon "intercitizenship" during an address to the Fellows of ] at Oxford.<ref>L. Dyer, "Anglo-Saxon Citizenship", ''The Barrister'' 3 (1897):107. Cited in Dimitry Kochenov (2019) ''Citizenship'' {{ISBN|9780262537797}}, page 139.</ref>
{{Further|19th-century Anglo-Saxonism}}
The American businessman ],{{sfn|Reynolds|2004}} a proponent of the idea that there is something special about the cultural and legal (]) traditions of English-speaking nations, writes in his 2004 book ''The Anglosphere Challenge'':


{{blockquote|The Anglosphere, as a network civilization without a corresponding political form, has necessarily imprecise boundaries. Geographically, the densest nodes of the Anglosphere are found in the United States and the United Kingdom. English-speaking Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and English-speaking South Africa (who constitute a very small minority in that country) are also significant populations. The English-speaking Caribbean, English-speaking ] and the English-speaking educated populations in Africa and India constitute other important nodes.{{sfn|Bennett, 2004b|p=80}}}}
The Anglosphere nations freely interchange cultural materials. Certain actors, directors, movies, literature, and TV shows enjoy high levels of popularity across the Anglosphere nations. The USA remains the largest global exporter in film, television and music; within the United States, many prominent actors and some musicians originate from other Anglosphere nations. Stars such as ] (] and ]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (]) and ] (]) often appear to transcend their birth nationalities, and instead adopt cross-cultural identities that have earned them great popularity with fans of all seven nations. The Anglosphere's main cultural divide continues to be over ]s, which vary considerably from nation to nation, with ] (in its varying forms), ], ], ], ] and ] having different popularities.


Bennett argues that there are two challenges confronting his concept of the Anglosphere. The first is finding ways to cope with rapid technological advancement and the second is the geopolitical challenges created by what he assumes will be an increasing gap between anglophone prosperity and economic struggles elsewhere.<ref>{{harvnb|Bennett, 2004b|loc=}}{{Page needed|date=August 2010}}</ref>
==Criticism==
The Anglosphere as a concept has attracted some debate. Critical views overlap, and also extend over a number of schools of thought.


British historian ] claims that the Anglosphere has been central in the ], ] and ]. He goes on to contend that anglophone unity is necessary for the defeat of ].<ref>{{harvnb|Roberts|2006|loc=}}{{Page needed|date=August 2010}}</ref>
===Cultural relativists===
Some have criticised the term as an application of ] to ] by implying that certain nations and their cultures are superior to others. Journalist ] wrote, "instead of the ], the anglosphere... I don’t hate Britain, and I am not ashamed of my nationality, but I have no idea why I should love this country more than any other. There are some things I like about it and some things I don’t, and the same goes for everywhere else I’ve visited."<ref name="montbiot">{{Cite web
| url=http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2005/08/09/the-new-chauvinism/
| title=The New Chauvinism
| accessdate=2007-07-24
| author=George Monbiot
| year=9 August 2005
}}</ref>


According to a 2003 profile in '']'', historian ] favoured a ] from the ] in favour of creating "a much looser association of English-speaking nations, known as the 'Anglosphere{{'"}}.{{sfn|Brown|2003}}{{sfn|Wellings|Baxendale|2015}}
===Regionalists===
] believe that the idea of cultural alliances is a distraction from regionally-based unions or partnerships, such as ] and ] in United States and Canada, the ] for the United Kingdom or ] and the ] for Australia and New Zealand.


====CANZUK====
Regionalists tend to be on the ]. In the United States they tend to favour ] from South and Central America.<ref name="zmag">{{Cite web
{{main|CANZUK}}
| url=http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10203
Favourability ratings tend to be overwhelmingly positive between countries within a subset of the core Anglosphere known as ] (consisting of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom),{{says who?|date=April 2023}} whose members form part of the ] and retain Charles III as head of state. In the wake of the ] (Brexit) as a result of a ], there has been mounting political and popular support for a loose free travel and common market area to be formed among the CANZUK countries.<ref name="ipol2">{{cite web|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/24/canzuk-conservatives-and-canada-marching-backward-to-empire/|title=CANZUK, Conservatives and Canada: Marching backward to empire – iPolitics|date=24 February 2017|access-date=26 December 2017|archive-date=26 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170226002936/https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/24/canzuk-conservatives-and-canada-marching-backward-to-empire/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thercs.org/assets/Press-Releases/UK-polling-release-embargoed-13.03.16-1.pdf|title=UK public strongly backs freedom to live and work in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand|access-date=26 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170106035304/https://www.thercs.org/assets/Press-Releases/UK-polling-release-embargoed-13.03.16-1.pdf|archive-date=6 January 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canzukinternational.com/2017/04/significant-support-for-canzuk-free.html|title=Survey Reveals Support For CANZUK Free Movement|website=CANZUK International|access-date=26 December 2017|archive-date=22 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222104947/http://www.canzukinternational.com/2017/04/significant-support-for-canzuk-free.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
| title=Who Are You Calling An Immigrant?
| accessdate=2007-07-24
| author=Tom Hayden
| year=4 May 2006
}}</ref> In the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada, critics may see the United States as representing a type of cultural conservatism and economic liberalism, which they believe should be avoided. There is also unease that the argument towards cultural allegiances is a proxy for ]: that is to say, it encourages partnerships with white nations in geographically diverse, and often far-off locations rather than ones with closer, ethnically different neighbours.


===Criticisms===
In such a vein, ] has written that the term overstates the similarities of the United States and the UK, and understates the similarities of, and the connections between, the UK and continental Europe.<ref name="nyrb">{{Cite web
In 2000, ] wrote in an exchange with ], published by the '']'', that the term neglects the evolution of fundamental legal and cultural differences between the US and the UK, and the ways in which UK and European norms drew closer together during Britain's membership in the EU through ]. Of Conquest's view of the Anglosphere, Ignatieff writes: "He seems to believe that Britain should either ] or refuse all further measures of cooperation, which would jeopardize Europe's real achievements. He wants Britain to throw in its lot with a union of English-speaking peoples, and I believe this to be a romantic illusion".{{sfn|Conquest|Reply by Ignatieff|2000}}
| url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/104
| title=THE 'ANGLOSPHERE'
| accessdate=2007-07-24
| author=Robert Conquest, Reply by Michael Ignatieff
| year=23 March 2000
| publisher=The New York Review of Books
}}</ref>


In 2016, ] wrote in an article titled "It's a Eurosceptic fantasy that the 'Anglosphere' wants Brexit" for '']'''s Coffee House blog: {{"'}}Anglosphere' is just the right's ] replacement for what we used to call in blunter times 'the ]'."<ref>{{cite web|first=Nick|last=Cohen|url=https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/its-a-eurosceptic-fantasy-that-the-anglosphere-wants-brexit/|title=It's a Eurosceptic fantasy that the 'Anglosphere' wants Brexit - Coffee House|date=12 April 2016|access-date=3 September 2018|archive-date=28 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228110613/https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/its-a-eurosceptic-fantasy-that-the-anglosphere-wants-brexit/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/the-guardian-view-on-the-eu-debate-its-about-much-more-than-migration|title=The Guardian view on the EU debate: it's about much more than migration &#124; Editorial|newspaper=The Guardian|date=1 June 2016|via=www.theguardian.com|access-date=26 May 2020|archive-date=26 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726033459/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/the-guardian-view-on-the-eu-debate-its-about-much-more-than-migration|url-status=live}}</ref> He repeated this criticism in another article for '']'' in 2018.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/14/brexit-britain-out-of-options-humiliation-painful|title=Brexit Britain is out of options. Our humiliation is painful to watch - Nick Cohen|first=Nick|last=Cohen|date=14 July 2018|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=27 January 2019|archive-date=15 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215213128/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/14/brexit-britain-out-of-options-humiliation-painful|url-status=live}}</ref> Similar criticism was presented by other critics such as Canadian academic Srđan Vučetić.<ref>{{cite web|first=Srdjan|last=Vucetic|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/24/canzuk-conservatives-and-canada-marching-backward-to-empire/|title=CANZUK, Conservatives and Canada: Marching backward to empire - iPolitics|date=24 February 2017|access-date=26 December 2017|archive-date=26 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170226002936/https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/24/canzuk-conservatives-and-canada-marching-backward-to-empire/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|first=Srdjan|last=Vucetic|url=https://www.opencanada.org/features/canada-and-anglo-world-where-do-we-stand/|title=Canada and the Anglo World – where do we stand?|website=OpenCanada|date=26 April 2016|access-date=3 September 2018|archive-date=4 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904011311/https://www.opencanada.org/features/canada-and-anglo-world-where-do-we-stand/|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Realists===
{{SectOR|date=November 2007}}
Realism is a defined school of thought on international relations, more interested in maintaining effective power dynamics and self-gain than culture partnerships. It sees ] as the defining factor in a state's relations, and may conclude that culture is irrelevant, aside from perhaps as a ] source. The clash between realists and Anglospherists may be sharper than any clash with another school.


In 2018, amidst the aftermath of the ], two British professors of public policy ] and Nick Pearce published a critical scholarly monograph titled ''Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics'' ({{ISBN|978-1509516612}}). In one of a series of accompanying opinion pieces, they questioned:<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/opinion/donald-trump-uk-visit-anglosphere-brexit.html|title=Opinion – Britain, Time to Let Go of the 'Anglosphere'|newspaper=The New York Times|date=2018-07-13|last1=Kenny|first1=Michael|last2=Pearce|first2=Nick|access-date=30 July 2018|archive-date=31 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180731000250/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/opinion/donald-trump-uk-visit-anglosphere-brexit.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
Realists argue that it is dangerous for one power to see itself as having a permanent alliance with another power whose interests in a few years may be at odds with their own.


{{blockquote|The tragedy of the different national orientations that have emerged in British politics after empire—whether pro-European, Anglo-American, Anglospheric or some combination of these—is that none of them has yet been the compelling, coherent and popular answer to the country's most important question: How should Britain find its way in the wider, modern world?}}
The most notable clash between Anglospherists and realists came during the ], when the United States and Canada refused to support the UK over the Anglo-French ] intervention (with ]'s collusion).


They stated in another article:<ref name="ukandeu">{{cite web|last1=Kenny|first1=Michael|last2=Pearce|first2=Nick|url=http://ukandeu.ac.uk/in-the-shadows-of-empire-how-the-anglosphere-dream-lives-on/|title=In the shadows of empire: how the Anglosphere dream lives on – UK in a changing Europe|date=11 May 2018|access-date=30 July 2018|archive-date=14 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180514084659/http://ukandeu.ac.uk/in-the-shadows-of-empire-how-the-anglosphere-dream-lives-on/|url-status=live}}</ref>
A second spot of tension came during the ], during which some realists in the administration of President ] encouraged the United States not to support the British side of the conflict. Some held the view that an Argentinian defeat would endanger the ], with the possible risk of it being replaced by a ] Government, which would have weakened the US position in the ]. In the end the realists lost the argument however, and the US provided ] and ] support to the UK after the failure of ]'s diplomacy.


{{blockquote|Meanwhile, the other core English-speaking countries to which the Anglosphere refers, show no serious inclination to join the UK in forging new political and economic alliances. They will, most likely, continue to work within existing regional and international institutions and remain indifferent to – or simply perplexed by – calls for some kind of formalised Anglosphere alliance.}}
Most recently since ], the ] emphasised differences. Canada and New Zealand refused to support combat activities conducted by the coalition with the other three countries (other than with small contingents engaged in ancillary activities).


===Autonomists=== ==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
{{SectOR|date=November 2007}}
* ]
Autonomists criticise the Anglosphere concept from the cultural side. They argue that the culture of a particular society is either largely home grown, or consists of many more factors than simple heritage from the "Anglosphere", and that the Anglosphere concept tends generally to underestimate the impact of non-English cultures, such as the ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] cultures. They argue that in all member states, there is wide variation from the supposed distinctive characteristics of the Anglosphere.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]; ] (French), ] (Spanish), ] (Portuguese)
* '']'' (Winston Churchill)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] (WASP)


{{div col end}}
Similarly, they regard ] as having been divorced from the United Kingdom for too long to be regarded as congruent.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} For example, Americans are more likely to be friendly to ], and the British to the ] and ]. Since the ] American and British experiences have greatly diverged, the United Kingdom's experience of a worldwide ] not being shared by Americans (though the United States has held colonies such as the ] and ], and some have argued that America has behaved as an empire at various other times throughout its history - see ] for more details on this controversial issue). Autonomists argue that, furthermore, the two World Wars did not at all provide the same experiences, the particular British reaction being formative of much of its post-war culture.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
{{Portal bar|British Empire}}


==Notes==
In the United States autonomists tend to be natural ]s, while in Australia they are found both on the right and the left (e.g. see the 1930s ]). In the United Kingdom, they also fall across the political spectrum (see ]).
{{Notelist}}


==References==
==The core-and-satellite model==
===Citations===
When considering for purpose of argument a six-country Anglospheric model (USA, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand), the Anglosphere is made up of three regions, each split into a larger dominant "core" and a smaller subsidiary "]". Namely:
{{Reflist|30em}}


===Bibliography===
#]: United Kingdom + Ireland
* {{Cite news|last=Bell|first=Duncan|date=19 January 2017 |url=https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/anglosphere-old-dream-brexit-role-in-the-world |title=The Anglosphere: new enthusiasm for an old dream|publisher=Prospect}}
#]: United States of America + Canada
*{{Cite book|first=Luca|last= Bellocchio|title=Anglosfera. Forma e forza del nuovo Pan-Anglismo|publisher= Genova, Il Melangolo|year=2006|isbn=978-88-7018-601-7}}
#]: Australia + New Zealand
*{{cite journal |last1=Bennett |first1=James C. |title=Dreaming Europe in a Wide-Awake World |journal=The National Interest |date=2004 |issue=78 |pages=119–129 |jstor=42897514 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/42897514 |issn=0884-9382|ref={{harvid|Bennett, 2004a}}}}
*{{Cite book|last=Bennett |first=James C. |year=2004 |title=The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_SaenLfzEAUC&pg=PA80 |isbn=978-0742533325|ref={{harvid|Bennett, 2004b}}}}
*{{cite book |last1=Bennett |first1=James C. |title=The Third Anglosphere Century: The English-Speaking World in an Era of Transition |date=2007 |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |id={{ASIN|0891952772|country=uk}} |language=en}}
*{{Cite news|last=Brown |first=Andrew |date=15 February 2003 |url=http://books.guardian.co.uk/poetry/features/0,12887,902797,00.html |title=Scourge and poet|work=The Guardian}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Conquest |first1=Robert |last2=Reply by Ignatieff |first2=Michael |date=23 March 2000 |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/104 |title=The 'Anglosphere' |journal=The New York Review of Books |volume=47 |issue=8 |access-date=2007-07-24}}
<!--D-->
*{{cite report |last1=Davies |first1=Andrew |last2=Dobell |first2=Graeme |last3=Jennings |first3=Peter |last4=Norgrove |first4=Sarah |last5=Smith |first5=Andrew |last6=Stuart |first6=Nic |last7=White |first7=Hugh |title=Keep calm and carry on: Reflections on the Anglosphere |date=2013 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep04038 |publisher=Australian Strategic Policy Institute|ref={{harvid|Davies et al. 2013}}}}
<!--H-->
*{{cite news|last=Hannan|first=Daniel|date=2 March 2014|title=The Anglosphere is alive and well, but I wonder whether it needs a better name|newspaper=]|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100261784/the-anglosphere-is-alive-and-well-but-i-wonder-whether-it-needs-a-better-name/|access-date=12 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160407201815/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100261784/the-anglosphere-is-alive-and-well-but-i-wonder-whether-it-needs-a-better-name/|archive-date=7 April 2016|url-status=dead}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Kenny|first1=Michael |last2=Pearce|first2=Nick |year=2015 |title=The rise of the Anglosphere: how the right dreamed up a new conservative world order|journal=New Statesman |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/02/rise-anglosphere-how-right-dreamed-new-conservative-world-order
|access-date=2018-05-23}}
*{{Cite book|last1=Kenny |first1=Michael |last2=Pearce |first2=Nick |year=2018 |title=Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics |publisher=Polity |isbn=978-1-509-51660-5| url=http://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509516605}}
<!--L-->
*{{cite journal|title=Transgovernmental Policy Networks in the Anglosphere|first=Tim|last=Legrand|date=1 December 2015|journal=Public Administration|volume=93|issue=4|pages=973–991|doi=10.1111/padm.12198}}
*{{cite journal
|title=Elite, exclusive and elusive: transgovernmental policy networks and iterative policy transfer in the Anglosphere
|first=Tim|last=Legrand
|date= 22 June 2016
|journal=Policy Studies
|volume=37|issue=5|pages=440–455
|doi=10.1080/01442872.2016.1188912|s2cid=156577293}}
*{{cite journal |last=Lloyd |first=John |year=2000 |title=The Anglosphere Project |journal=New Statesman |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/node/193400 |access-date=30 November 2012 |archive-date=13 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151213070342/http://www.newstatesman.com/node/193400 |url-status=dead }}
*{{cite journal|journal=]|first1= Shashi|last1= Parulekar |first2=Joel|last2= Kotkin |url=https://www.city-journal.org/html/state-anglosphere-13447.html|year=2012|title= The State of the Anglosphere}}
* {{Cite news|first=Peter|last=Pomerantsev|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/the-idealistic-pull-of-the-anglosphere-leave-brexit-emotions/|title=The idealistic pull of the 'Anglosphere'|publisher=]|date=2016-07-13}}
<!--R-->
*{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/28/uselections2004.usa4|title=Explaining the 'Anglosphere'|first=Glenn|last=Reynolds|date=28 October 2004|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=31 July 2018|archive-date=4 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003426/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/28/uselections2004.usa4|url-status=live}}
*{{Cite book |last=Roberts |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Roberts (historian) |year=2006 |title=A History of the English-Speaking Peoples Since 1900 |publisher=Weidenfeld & Nicolson |isbn=978-0297850762 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofenglish0000robe }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Robertson |first=Peter E. |title=The Real Military Balance: International Comparisons of Defense Spending |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/roiw.12536 |journal=Review of Income and Wealth |year=2022 |volume=68 |issue=3 |pages=797–818 |language=en |doi=10.1111/roiw.12536 |issn=1475-4991 |s2cid=240601701 |access-date=3 November 2021 |archive-date=13 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220513075755/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/roiw.12536 |url-status=live }}
<!--V-->
*{{cite book |last=Vucetic |first=Srdjan |year=2011 |title=The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-7224-2}}
<!--W-->
*{{cite web|last1=Wellings|last2=Baxendale|first1=Ben|first2=Helen| url=http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2015/12/10/anglosphere-is-the-other-side-of-the-eurosceptic-coin-a-conception-of-britains-identity-and-place-in-the-world/|title=The power of the Anglosphere in Eurosceptical thought|date=10 December 2015|access-date=2 August 2018|archive-date=1 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180801010227/http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2015/12/10/anglosphere-is-the-other-side-of-the-eurosceptic-coin-a-conception-of-britains-identity-and-place-in-the-world/|url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal |title= The Anglosphere in the Brexit Referendum|doi=10.4000/rfcb.1354|first=Ben|last=Wellings|journal=Revue française de civilisation britannique|year=2017|issue=2|volume=XXII|doi-access=free}}


==External links==
The association of an entire cultural region with the dominant "core" nation state is typically resented by the smaller "satellite" state. Irish, Canadian, and New Zealand identity is to some extent defined by its otherness, in a sort of "sibling mentality". Comparing the ] with that of ], a number of parallels exist. Although on a global scale, ] and ] combined are smaller than Canada by any metric, and they, along with the ] and ], and the rest of Europe for that matter, are also viewed by many as satellites of the ] and its global influence. Nevertheless, the satellite states, in this particular regional model, have developed a world-view and ] that places a greater emphasis on ] rather than ] institutions{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. Certainly, Ireland has been first a neutral nation, then oriented towards the EU. This tendency was partially illustrated during the build-up to the ] which saw the Anglosphere satellite states (Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand) refuse to involve themselves, in direct contrast to the three core states (USA, UK, and Australia), although the full reason for this division is perhaps more complex and nuanced. It should be noted, also, that this model does not consider the unpopularity of the Iraq war among the UK and Australian general populations and the contributions made by other countries such as Italy, Spain and Japan.
{{Wiktionary|Anglosphere}}
*, presented to the ]
*
*


==Historical perspectives==
The United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland are all former ] of the British Empire, and the first four of these were settled by immigrants from Britain and Ireland. The similarities of these countries, it is sometimes argued, were manifested by certain historical conditions which they have all faced.

Anglosphere nations have a history of co-operation and close political ties. A network of varying ]s as well as intelligence arrangements exists between five of the nations, and some are in ]s with each other. The countries of the Anglosphere were military allies in the majority of major world conflicts in the ]. The United States, the UK, and Australia continued in this vein in their cooperation in the ], a venture in which other close allies of the United States did not participate.

===The United Kingdom and the European 'Continent'===
Seeking to make a distinction between the Anglosphere and other countries of Europe or ] ("the continent", or "continental Europe", as it is sometimes referred to) comes down to identifying key differences between the United Kingdom and the other members of the ]. Arguing that the Anglosphere is culturally different from "Continental Europe" assumes '']'' that there is a unified "continental" European culture, something which is not supported by historical perspective.

There are certainly key cultural differences between the United Kingdom and individual European states (e.g. France or Italy), but it would be difficult to sustain an argument that the culture of the UK is in some way unique in its distinctiveness when set against the massive diversity of "the continent" as a whole. It is possible to probe the continent's internal diversity by reflecting on the cultural similarities and differences of the following pairs of countries: Finland and Portugal, Lithuania and Italy, Bulgaria and Norway. However, if one is to generalise, the United Kingdom is perceived by most commentators to be more culturally similar to the near neighbour countries of northern and western Europe (e.g. Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden) and less similar to those of eastern Europe.

====Cultural differences: The example of the UK and France====
Advocates of the view that British culture is distinct from 'European' culture often draw on France as an example. Whilst it is possible to gain important insights into both cultures by probing the culture differences between the two states, there are undoubtedly many more cultural similarities than differences between the two countries, which are geographically close (France is one of the UK's nearest neighbouring states) and whose history and language are deeply intertwined (reference the history of the two states since ], the date of the Norman invasion of England and victory over the English at the ]).

In the ], England and France emerged as distinct leading European ]s. They were often at war. For centuries the English monarchs spoke ], had extensive holdings in Northern and Western France (at various times Calais, Normandy, Britanny, Anjou, Aquitaine). The motos on the UK royal coat of arms is still in in French. Until 1801, the Royal Arms also contained the Arms of France (three gold fleurs-de-lis on a blue background) in one quarter, dating from the claim to the French throne made by Edward III in 1337 that lead to the ].

From the ] onward, as the two countries conquered extensive empires outside Europe, each attempted to increase its colonial possessions and prevent the other from doing so. France lost most of its possessions in India and North America to the British in the 18th century, although the British later lost the 13 colonies of the United States which revolted with French assistance. The rivalry was renewed in the scramble for Africa in the 19th century. Although both countries have lost their empires, apart from a few residual dependencies, and are now members of the ], some traces of Anglo-French rivalry remain.

In language, on the other hand, there has been a profound mutual influence between ] and ] cultures. After the ] of England in ], ] remained the language of the English court and ruling class for three hundred years. Mediaeval English grew from the need for communication between the Norman French speaking lords and their English peasants who spoke Anglo-Saxon with Norse/Danish influences. This is why it has a much simplified grammar (for example most words do not have gender and verb declension is limited). Other migrations of French speakers to England were ] and ] fleeing wars of religion in the 16th century, and royalist refugees from the French Revolution at the end of the 18th century. Roughly a third of the vocabulary of the ] (e.g. ''agree'', ''brave'', ''carry'', ''define'', ''empire'', etc.) comes from the French language. The English have without compunction seized new words from many other languages while French academics are called upon instead to devise new French words that conform to existing French vocabulary and in particular to resist ]. The French strive to maintain their language as part of their cultural heritage whilst the English are disinterested in attempting to control the evolution of their language.

In this debate, the example of Canadian confederation - the ongoing interaction between French and English Canada providing a major impetus in its development - is a prominent one, reflected in Canada's membership in both the ] and ].

=== The USA and continental European influence ===
Regardless of the distance separating America from Europe (unlike the United Kingdom's proximity), the country's population is also significantly descended from non-Anglo European immigration during the 19th and 20th centuries. The total number of immigrants from European regions other than England largely outnumbers those of English ancestry. ] was originally a French colony with French settlers; parts of New York and New Jersey were originally a Dutch colony, ]; while ] and the entire ] were originally Spanish possessions. Furthermore, the Southwestern United States, which includes what are now the country's two most populous states in California and Texas, was part of Mexico until well into the 19<sup>th</sup> century. There have been numerous non-British influences in the United States. All manner of Continental European cultures are now fused in the United States.

According to the most recent census, only 8.7% of Americans claim to have predominant English ancestries, with other British and Irish groups such as the Scottish, Welsh and ] each making up less than 2% of the population.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} Combined however, British and Irish ancestries would by far be the largest ancestral group in the US ('''~ 25%''' of the population). This figure would be even greater if one includes those claiming 'American' ancestry, but who are also of British Isles origins. The top three ] in the United States are German (15.2%), Irish (10.8%), and African (8.8%). Italians (5.6%), Polish (3.2%) and French (3%) are also major self-identified continental European ancestries.

America has a history of direct contact with Europe, other than through the United Kingdom's affairs.

===The United Kingdom and the 'continental' experience: political history===
Proponents of the concept of Anglosphere argue that no English-speaking country ever was ruled by an ], hence none has ever seen the effectiveness and sheer dominance of such rulers as ] of Russia, ] of Prussia, or ]. This is however only true for those countries outside the British Isles, and the United States was born of a struggle, the ], against taxation imposed, if not by an absolute monarch, then by a non-representative British colonial government. Ireland, largely English speaking, made many attempts to throw off the English (later British) yoke, until successful in the 20th century in obtaining home rule for geographically the greater part of Ireland as a 'free state' and later completely independent status as a republic. The power of the English kings was gradually eroded with milestones being actions to wrest power from the king by the nobility at ] and by the landed commons in the ] and ]. The ] and ] could quite well be considered as struggles against attempts by kings of the Scottish Stuart dynasty, Charles I and James II/VII, to re-establish an absolute monarchy in both England and Scotland. It can be argued that James's overthrow began the modern English ] ]: never again would the monarch hold ] power.

At the time of the ], after the ] had ended, ] reforms started earlier in the UK, with ] in 1829, propelled by the economic and social changes spoken of as the ]. The process took a century to complete, however, if ] is taken as the marker. Other European countries overlapped in particular reforms. The character of UK politics differed in several ways from those prevalent in continental Europe, with ] largely absent and feeling against the ] rarely politicised, British ] more closely allied with the ] religious tradition and British ] and ] thinking considered by some to have been largely moderated by ]'s ] thought (if one excepts the ] question, to 1922). As a result, Continental European politics appears to be more driven by partisan feeling.

===Institutional history===
A certain residual resistance against the ] is symptomatic in the USA. On the other hand, the UK, Ireland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have largely embraced the metric system in principle, if not always in practice.

English-speaking countries, except for the state of ], and parts of Canada, have not had legal systems based on the ]. The case of ] is considered anomalous, since ] is an older system largely independent of ]. Some states in the USA, that at one time were a part of the ] and later ] have vestiges of the Napoleonic Code. The ] statutes in regards to family law (most relevant in divorce property distribution) that are present in ] and seven other western states are an example of this.

No English-speaking country ever had a government installed by ], though there were some ] in England. The foreign princes (Dutch and German following the ]) ruling in England were in theory ]s, on sufferance. On the other hand, there was an earlier scare that England would become a fief of the ]'s ruling ] family when ] was king in right of marriage to ].

No English-speaking country (save, perhaps, Ireland and, in more modern times, South Africa, the latter only when speakers of ] were politically dominant) had the ] that existed throughout Europe in the late ] and throughout the ], and which were brought to a higher level under ]. (This ignores some facts about British government actions, in particular in the ] scares of the 1790s; it might be defended as a broad description of policy, such as the non-recognition of a ]).

Against this one can argue that the UK and USA have in fact fundamental divergences in a number of aspects of their institutions. These include separation of church and state, the ]s and the ]. For example, the UK has a constitution distributed piecemeal amongst various competing texts, a parliamentary system, and a centralized (though partly devolved) government; the USA has a unitary written constitution, a presidential-congressional system, and a federal governing structure, with multiple levels of sovereignty. Though both nations are certainly democratic, (and the two systems they have, the Westminster and Presidential-Congressional systems, are the first democratic systems to emerge since antiquity) both are very different in structure and outcomes produced.

===Commonalities in the twentieth century===
The consequences of the ] did not result in ] or ] being adopted in the Anglosphere; there were fascist and communist sympathisers, but they never gained political power except in some very limited ways. None of the countries was occupied by the Fascist powers (except the ], which are ] rather than part of the UK), and some United States territory in the Pacific (Attu and Kiska in the Aleutian Islands, Wake Island, and Guam).

The philosophical trends in the United Kingdom, with ] gaining at one point the upper hand, and in the United States, with a consistent strand of interest in types of ], differ from the ] and ] in continental Europe. This distinction became sharp around ].

Identity cards were used in the UK as part of a National Register 1915-1919 and 1939-1952. Otherwise identity documents have not yet been required. Their introduction was motivated by the government wish to register adults for possible conscription for the two world wars, although they were retained for a period after each conflict.

Discussion of Anglo-American diplomacy is often formulated, from the UK side, in terms of the existence and health of the ], mostly harking back to the years 1941 to 1945 of very close alliance. This could be called a 'Churchillian' formulation.

The Anglosphere has cemented itself in formal alliances, such as that of the ] and ], and is more directly manifested in the existence of the ] and the ], an intelligence-gathering alliance formed by Anglosphere members.

===Current trends===
], in his controversial work '']'' (2004), claimed that America's ] is largely based on Anglo-Protestant culture, and that ] culture represents a threat to that heritage; in other words, the USA is subject to a pull towards ].

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== Sources==

*Ankerl, Guy: ''Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western.'' Geneva: INUPRESS, 2000. ISBN 2881550045.
* Bennett, James C., ''The Third Anglosphere Century: The English-Speaking World in an Era of Transition'' Heritage Foundation, 2007. 119 pp.

==See also==
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* Anglo-ethnic
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]s
** ]s
*** ]
*]
*]
{{English official language clickable map}} {{English official language clickable map}}
{{Territories of the British Empire}}


]
==External links==
]
* official site
* - UK government site

===Commonwealth===
* Main all-Commonwealth group





] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 07:07, 28 December 2024

Grouping of English-speaking nations This article is about group of English-speaking nations with close political and military ties and their sphere of influence. For usage of English worldwide, see English-speaking world.

Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Anglosphere_Geometry.svg
The Anglosphere, according to James Bennett (The Anglosphere Challenge)   Core Anglosphere   Middle Anglosphere (states where English is one of several official languages, but not necessarily widely spoken by the native population)   Outer sphere (English-using states of other civilisations)   Periphery (states where English is widely used but is not an official governmental language)

The Anglosphere, also known as the Anglo-American world, is the Anglo-American sphere of influence, with a core group of nations that today maintain close political, diplomatic and military co-operation. While the nations included in different sources vary, the Anglosphere is usually not considered to include all countries where English is an official language, so it is not synonymous with the sphere of anglophones, though commonly included nations are those that were formerly part of the British Empire and retained the English language and English common law.

The five core countries of the Anglosphere are usually taken to be Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These countries enjoy close cultural and diplomatic links with one another and are aligned under military and security programmes such as Five Eyes.

Definitions and variable geometry

The Anglosphere is the Anglo-American sphere of influence. The term was first coined by the science fiction writer Neal Stephenson in his book The Diamond Age, published in 1995. John Lloyd adopted the term in 2000 and defined it as including English-speaking countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, South Africa, and the British West Indies. James C. Bennett defines anglosphere as "the English-speaking Common Law-based nations of the world", arguing that former British colonies that retained English common law and the English language have done significantly better than counterparts colonised by other European powers. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the Anglosphere as "the countries of the world in which the English language and cultural values predominate". However the Anglosphere is usually not considered to include all countries where English is an official language, so it is not synonymous with anglophone.

Core Anglosphere

The definition is usually taken to include Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States in a grouping of developed countries called the core Anglosphere. The term Anglosphere can also more widely encompass Ireland, Malta and the Commonwealth Caribbean countries.

The five core countries in the Anglosphere are developed countries that maintain close cultural and diplomatic links with one another. They are aligned under such military and security programmes as:

Relations have traditionally been warm between Anglosphere countries, with bilateral partnerships such as those between Australia and New Zealand, the United States and Canada and the United States and the United Kingdom (the Special Relationship) constituting the most successful partnerships in the world.

In terms of political systems, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have Charles III as head of state, form part of the Commonwealth of Nations and use the Westminster parliamentary system of government. Most of the core countries have first-past-the-post electoral systems, though Australia and New Zealand have reformed their systems and there are other systems used in some elections in the UK. As a consequence, most core Anglosphere countries have politics dominated by two major parties.

Below is a table comparing the five core countries of the Anglosphere (data for 2022/2023):

Country Population Land area
(km)
GDP Nominal
(USD bn)
GDP PPP
(USD bn)
GDP PPP per capita
(USD)
National wealth PPP (USD bn) Military spending PPP
(USD bn)
 Australia 26,009,249 7,692,020 1,707 1,718 65,366 7,661 22.0
 Canada 38,708,793 9,984,670 2,089 2,385 60,177 9,971 23.3
 New Zealand 5,130,623 262,443 251 278 54,046 1,229 3.1
 United Kingdom 67,081,234 241,930 3,158 3,846 56,471 16,208 70.2
 United States 332,718,707 9,833,520 26,854 26,854 80,035 114,932 734.3
Core Anglosphere 469,648,606 27,329,350 34,059 28,115 65,700 150,001 852.9
... as % of World 5.9% 18.4% 32.3% 20% 3.3× 24.9% 32.9%

Culture and economics

Due to their historic links, the Anglosphere countries share many cultural traits that still persist today. Most countries in the Anglosphere follow the rule of law through common law rather than civil law, and favour democracy with legislative chambers above other political systems. Private property is protected by law or constitution.

Market freedom is high in the five core Anglosphere countries, as all five share the Anglo-Saxon economic model – a capitalist model that emerged in the 1970s based on the Chicago school of economics with origins from the 18th century United Kingdom. The shared sense of globalisation led cities such as New York, London, Los Angeles, Sydney, and Toronto to have considerable impacts on the international markets and the global economy. Global popular culture has been highly influenced by the United States and the United Kingdom.

Proponents and critics

Proponents of the Anglosphere concept typically come from the political right (such as Andrew Roberts of the UK Conservative Party), and critics from the centre-left (for example Michael Ignatieff of the Liberal Party of Canada).

Proponents

As early as 1897, Albert Venn Dicey proposed an Anglo-Saxon "intercitizenship" during an address to the Fellows of All Souls at Oxford.

Further information: 19th-century Anglo-Saxonism

The American businessman James C. Bennett, a proponent of the idea that there is something special about the cultural and legal (common law) traditions of English-speaking nations, writes in his 2004 book The Anglosphere Challenge:

The Anglosphere, as a network civilization without a corresponding political form, has necessarily imprecise boundaries. Geographically, the densest nodes of the Anglosphere are found in the United States and the United Kingdom. English-speaking Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and English-speaking South Africa (who constitute a very small minority in that country) are also significant populations. The English-speaking Caribbean, English-speaking Oceania and the English-speaking educated populations in Africa and India constitute other important nodes.

Bennett argues that there are two challenges confronting his concept of the Anglosphere. The first is finding ways to cope with rapid technological advancement and the second is the geopolitical challenges created by what he assumes will be an increasing gap between anglophone prosperity and economic struggles elsewhere.

British historian Andrew Roberts claims that the Anglosphere has been central in the First World War, Second World War and Cold War. He goes on to contend that anglophone unity is necessary for the defeat of Islamism.

According to a 2003 profile in The Guardian, historian Robert Conquest favoured a British withdrawal from the European Union in favour of creating "a much looser association of English-speaking nations, known as the 'Anglosphere'".

CANZUK

Main article: CANZUK

Favourability ratings tend to be overwhelmingly positive between countries within a subset of the core Anglosphere known as CANZUK (consisting of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom), whose members form part of the Commonwealth of Nations and retain Charles III as head of state. In the wake of the United Kingdom's decision to leave the European Union (Brexit) as a result of a referendum held in 2016, there has been mounting political and popular support for a loose free travel and common market area to be formed among the CANZUK countries.

Criticisms

In 2000, Michael Ignatieff wrote in an exchange with Robert Conquest, published by the New York Review of Books, that the term neglects the evolution of fundamental legal and cultural differences between the US and the UK, and the ways in which UK and European norms drew closer together during Britain's membership in the EU through regulatory harmonisation. Of Conquest's view of the Anglosphere, Ignatieff writes: "He seems to believe that Britain should either withdraw from Europe or refuse all further measures of cooperation, which would jeopardize Europe's real achievements. He wants Britain to throw in its lot with a union of English-speaking peoples, and I believe this to be a romantic illusion".

In 2016, Nick Cohen wrote in an article titled "It's a Eurosceptic fantasy that the 'Anglosphere' wants Brexit" for The Spectator's Coffee House blog: "'Anglosphere' is just the right's PC replacement for what we used to call in blunter times 'the white Commonwealth'." He repeated this criticism in another article for The Guardian in 2018. Similar criticism was presented by other critics such as Canadian academic Srđan Vučetić.

In 2018, amidst the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, two British professors of public policy Michael Kenny and Nick Pearce published a critical scholarly monograph titled Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics (ISBN 978-1509516612). In one of a series of accompanying opinion pieces, they questioned:

The tragedy of the different national orientations that have emerged in British politics after empire—whether pro-European, Anglo-American, Anglospheric or some combination of these—is that none of them has yet been the compelling, coherent and popular answer to the country's most important question: How should Britain find its way in the wider, modern world?

They stated in another article:

Meanwhile, the other core English-speaking countries to which the Anglosphere refers, show no serious inclination to join the UK in forging new political and economic alliances. They will, most likely, continue to work within existing regional and international institutions and remain indifferent to – or simply perplexed by – calls for some kind of formalised Anglosphere alliance.

See also

Portal:

Notes

  1. "The Anglosphere – shorthand for the Anglo-American sphere of influence – established the concept and structure of the modern transnational community.... The Anglosphere (in the narrow sense of the former British Empire, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and the US) has been the architect and a staunch proponent of international norms."
  2. "The group of countries where English is the main native language." (Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (6th ed.), Oxford University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0-19-920687-2 ).

References

Citations

  1. Browning, Christopher S. and Tonra, Ben (2010) "Beyond the West and towards the Anglosphere?" In: Browning, Christopher S. and Lehti, Marko, (eds.) The struggle for the West: a divided and contested legacy. Abingdon, Oxfordshire; New York: Routledge, pp. 161–181. ISBN 9780415476836: https://www.academia.edu/341929/Beyond_the_West_and_Towards_the_Anglosphere Archived 3 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine
  2. Baylis, John; Smith, Steve; Owens, Patricia (2014). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. OUP Oxford. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-19-965617-2.
  3. Davies et al. 2013.
  4. ^ Lloyd 2000.
  5. Bennett, 2004b, pp. 3, 67.
  6. Bennett 2007, pp. 42–43.
  7. Merriam-Webster Staff (2010). "Anglosphere". Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2010.
  8. "The Anglosphere and its Others: The 'English-speaking Peoples' in a Changing World Order – British Academy". British Academy. Archived from the original on 22 April 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  9. "The Anglosphere: Past, present and future". The British Academy.
  10. Burn-Murdoch, John (17 March 2023). "The Anglosphere needs to learn to love apartment living". Financial Times. Forty years ago, the UK, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland had roughly 400 homes per 1,000 residents, level with developed continental European countries. Since then the two groups have diverged, the Anglosphere standing still while western Europe has pulled clear to 560 per 1,000.
  11. Burn-Murdoch, John (25 April 2024). "The Anglosphere has an advantage on immigration". Financial Times. But a striking pattern emerges when you look at where these different impacts are clustered: almost everything looks better in Anglophone countries. Immigrants and their offspring in the UK, US and so on tend to be more skilled, have better jobs and often out-earn the native-born, while those in continental Europe fare worse. In terms of the fiscal impact, immigrants pay more in than they get out in the US, UK, Australia and Ireland, but are net recipients in Belgium, France, Sweden and the Netherlands.
  12. Shashi Parulekar and Joel Kotkin (2012). "The State of the Anglosphere". City Journal. Particularly citizens of what some call the Anglosphere: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand.
  13. Reed, Betsy (3 November 2017). "The Guardian view on languages and the British: Brexit and an Anglosphere prison". The Guardian. an Anglosphere of Britain, Ireland (sometimes), the British Commonwealth and above all the United States.
  14. Kuper, Simon (21 November 2014). "Which way is Ireland going?". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022.
  15. ^ Bennett, 2004b, p. 80.
  16. Legrand 2015.
  17. Legrand 2016.
  18. "The Trans-Tasman Relationship: A New Zealand Perspective" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 August 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2017.
  19. "U.S. and Canada: The World's Most Successful Bilateral Relationship". RealClearWorld. 9 March 2016. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 27 December 2017.
  20. Marsh, Steve (1 June 2012). "'Global Security: US–UK relations': lessons for the special relationship?". Journal of Transatlantic Studies. 10 (2): 182–199. doi:10.1080/14794012.2012.678119. S2CID 145271477.
  21. "FAOSTAT". www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 12 November 2016. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
  22. ^ "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". IMF. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  23. ^ "World Economic Outlook Database: October 2021". IMF. Archived from the original on 12 October 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
  24. "Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook 2021" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
  25. Credit Suisse figures adjusted using IMF WEO Oct 2021 GDP-PPP exchange rates.
  26. Robertson 2022.
  27. "Population clock". www.abs.gov.au. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Archived from the original on 13 December 2019. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
  28. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (11 July 2018). "Canada's population clock (real-time model)". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  29. "Population clock". archive.stats.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  30. "Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2020". www.ons.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  31. "Population Clock". www.census.gov. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  32. "The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency". www.cia.gov. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  33. ^ Michael Chertoff; et al. (2008). Building an Americanization Movement for the Twenty-first Century: A Report to the President of the United States from the Task Force on New Americans (PDF). Washington D.C. ISBN 978-0-16-082095-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 July 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2019.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  34. Kidd, John B.; Richter, Frank-Jürgen (2006). Development models, globalization and economies : a search for the Holy Grail?. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0230523555. OCLC 71339998.
  35. "Global Cities Index 2019". A.T. Kearney. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  36. L. Dyer, "Anglo-Saxon Citizenship", The Barrister 3 (1897):107. Cited in Dimitry Kochenov (2019) Citizenship ISBN 9780262537797, page 139.
  37. Reynolds 2004.
  38. Bennett, 2004b
  39. Roberts 2006
  40. Brown 2003.
  41. Wellings & Baxendale 2015.
  42. "CANZUK, Conservatives and Canada: Marching backward to empire – iPolitics". 24 February 2017. Archived from the original on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  43. "UK public strongly backs freedom to live and work in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  44. "Survey Reveals Support For CANZUK Free Movement". CANZUK International. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  45. Conquest & Reply by Ignatieff 2000.
  46. Cohen, Nick (12 April 2016). "It's a Eurosceptic fantasy that the 'Anglosphere' wants Brexit - Coffee House". Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
  47. "The Guardian view on the EU debate: it's about much more than migration | Editorial". The Guardian. 1 June 2016. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2020 – via www.theguardian.com.
  48. Cohen, Nick (14 July 2018). "Brexit Britain is out of options. Our humiliation is painful to watch - Nick Cohen". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
  49. Vucetic, Srdjan (24 February 2017). "CANZUK, Conservatives and Canada: Marching backward to empire - iPolitics". Archived from the original on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  50. Vucetic, Srdjan (26 April 2016). "Canada and the Anglo World – where do we stand?". OpenCanada. Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
  51. Kenny, Michael; Pearce, Nick (13 July 2018). "Opinion – Britain, Time to Let Go of the 'Anglosphere'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 July 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
  52. Kenny, Michael; Pearce, Nick (11 May 2018). "In the shadows of empire: how the Anglosphere dream lives on – UK in a changing Europe". Archived from the original on 14 May 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2018.

Bibliography

External links

English-speaking world
English speaking countries
English speaking countries
Further links
Articles
Lists
 
  • Countries and territories where English is the national language or the native language of the majority
Africa
Americas
Europe
Oceania
 
  • Countries and territories where English is an official language, but not the majority first language
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Dependencies shown in italics.
Former British Empire and Current British Overseas Territories
Legend
Former territory
Current territory
*Current Commonwealth realm
Current member of the Commonwealth of Nations
Europe
Africa
Asia
North America
Oceania
18th and 19th centuries20th century
South America
Antarctica and the South Atlantic
  • Since 2009 part of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; Ascension Island (1922–) and Tristan da Cunha (1938–) were previously dependencies of Saint Helena.
  • Claimed in 1908; territory formed 1962; overlaps portions of Argentine and Chilean claims, borders not enforced but claim not renounced under the Antarctic Treaty.
  • Claimed in 1908; territory formed 1985
Categories: