Misplaced Pages

User talk:Crockspot: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:21, 2 December 2007 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →FIRST: r← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:01, 14 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(87 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<center><br><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;">
'''As of August 2007, inactive discussions are archived by MiszaBot III after five days. See archive box for previous discussions.'''
<span style="color:white;font-weight:bold"><s>R&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;E</s>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;T&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;R&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;E&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; D</font>'''</div><br></center>
<div class="plainlinks">
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|align="center"|]
|align="left" width="100%"|.
|}</div>
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|minthreadsleft = 0
|algo = old(5d)
|archive = User talk:Crockspot/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}}
{{archive box collapsible|box-width=245px|
*] - 2006-05-08 to 2006-10-03<br />
*] - 2006-10-03 to 2007-04-29<br />
*] - 2007-04-30 to 2007-08-03<br />
*]<br />
*]<br />
*]<br />
*]
}}
----


<center>'''This user is tired of silly drama on Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{date|}}}|&nbsp;as of {{{date}}}|}}.'''</center>
== User:67.135.49.177 ==


If you need me, I'm at Wikinfo. ] 06:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe if he hadn't been warned twice and simply deleted the warnings there'd be a case for lifting the block. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


== In case you want to add your 2 cents ==


I see you're retired (but you voted on the ArbComm elections page), but just FYI, I started an Incident report you might be interested in . If not, that's fine. I won't drag you into something you don't want to deal with. Thanks for the defense the past couple days, too. ] 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Crockspot, User:67.135.49.177 is Jinxmchue. Jinmchue has been editing from two IPs in order to avoid scrutiny. These edits consists of edit warring only. This has resulted in multiple 3RR vios, disruption and at least one block. He's clearly using IPs to avoid having his bad behavior not associated with his main account, Jinxmchue. That falls under the defintion of sock puppetry at ]: "''alternate accounts ... a number of uses which are explicitly forbidden - in particular, using an alternate account to avoid scrutiny, to mislead others by making disruptive edits with one account and normal ones with another, or otherwise artificially stir up controversy is not permitted. Misuse of an alternate account may result in being blocked from editing.''"
:No thanks. I see you have caught a one month block under a dubious policy rationale. Not surprised with the amount of bullshit and smearing that has been shoveled. ] 20:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


== If anyone cares ==
How about doing something more constructive, like showing him the error of his way, rather than reverting a template which just enables and encourages the behavior that landed him here. ] 18:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
See my ] for a rundown of why I am no longer contributing. - ] 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
:While I might not have agreed with you on much, there is a bit of drama here; i would have hoped you would try and change things, but perhaps it's not worth your time; to each his own. I suppose your new home will , but enjoy it nonetheless. ]<sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small>]</small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 00:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
:: Thanks. The environment there is more conducive to people leaving each other alone, but Fred is still a stickler for not allowing "made up" stuff that isn't reliably sourced, so hopefully it will strike a good balance. My main focus will be on expanding the content (starting with WP's featured content), getting rid of redlinks, filling in all the missing templates, and keeping the school kids from screwing things up. There is a lot to do there just getting the basics taken care of, so I don't even have an interest in getting involved in content pushing matches. I'll be around here pretty much every day grabbing something or other to add over there. Misplaced Pages is a great resource for not having to reinvent the wheel. - ] (]) 00:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


==RfA==
:: I disagree with your interpretation of his activity. He logged out months ago, which is completely within his rights as an editor. During his few edits under a dynamic IP, he has never hidden who he was. I never had any problem spotting him, so it is no great sleuth job to figure out. While he may be more prone to frustration than is ideal, he has legitimate positions on the issues he is passionate about. There are countless editors who edit under IP, and have dynamic addresses that change every few days. That is not a crime. As for me doing something positive, I am. I am trying to set a positive example for him on the article and talk page where he was blocked for edit warring. He did not technically violate 3RR there, as far as I can see, nor did any other editor. But if we are going to characterize what was going on there as an edit war, then he is not the only guilty party, and should not have been the only editor blocked. To me, this smacks of a pack of hyenas ganging up on an editor they do not agree with. I'm not about to stand idly by and watch him be abused. This is not the first time he has been singled out while other guilty parties were let off the hook. It takes more than one editor to make an edit war, and just because one editor is outnumbered does not make the group any less guilty. I have hesitated to get involved in the ID-related articles, because frankly, it isn't something I care about all that much. I'm pretty neutral on the subject. But I do care about fair treatment of editors, and neutrality in editing and sourcing articles. From what I have seen, the ID articles are controlled by a group of anti-ID editors. The problems I pointed out with the lead intro of ] are symptomatic of this problem, and only scratch the surface of the NPOV problems that permeate those articles. You can rest assured that I will be more active in those article in the future, and will do so well withing policy and guidelines, hopefully setting a positive example for all of you. I'm quite busy these days, and have not been on wiki as much as usual, but I will be keeping an eye on things, and will speak out strongly when I see a problem. - ] 01:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your taking the time to comment on my RfA - see ]. I've added comments that might clarify some of the issues you had concerns with. Cheers! ] (]) 14:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


== Pseudo-Welcome back ==
:::Your own behavior is what is disrupting the project now. After your adovcacy and enabling of Jinxmchue's sock puppeting shenanigans, you've taken up walking in his footsteps by repeating his exact edits and edit warring:
I saw you were back and wondered what the heck you were up to. Anyway, welcome back to the love fest that is WP :) <small style="background:#ccc;border:#000 1px solid;padding:0 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap;">] | ]</small> 21:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
:::*
:Thanks, I'm trying to keep my mainspace edits to a bare minimum, basically keeping an eye on the lesser watched articles on my watchlist, but I will be getting involved in discussions in WP and User talk namespace. I am on WP constantly because of the adaptation of content to Wikinfo, so it's hard not to notice things going on. - ] (]) 21:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::*
:::Not only are you spread the disruption caused by a chronically policy violating edit warrior, you're repeating his exact same mistakes, both behaviorally and editorially, and tossing in some bogus warnings and a fair amount of hypocrisy to boot. Please think carefully your method of contributing before resuming that line of editing. You're not helping. You're making things worse for Jinxmchue/67.135.49.177, yourself, and the project. ] 02:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
::::Did you read my rationale on the talk page for making that edit? It has nothing to do with the reiliability of the source, it has to do with the fact that the cite does not source the statement it is attached to. It is superfluous, and adds new concepts that should be worked into the article on their own. I'll call an RfC on the question, and we'll see what truly neutral editors have to say about it. I will add that I think you should have asked another admin to protect those pages for you. - ] 02:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
:I'm admittedly violating what I said about not editing anything but my user pages until later with this, but this is a serious enough issue to warrant it. Monk, you need to provide evidence to back up your accusations of my alleged violations of 3RR, disruption and sockpuppetry or retract every single one of them. I won't be holding my breath waiting for that, though. ] 20:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


== Hannity ==
::Then don't do it. You're disrupting the project. Please take the time learn our policies while waiting for your block to expire. ] 02:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw your refs on the ] page, nice job. After reading about the previous problems you've had on here, I wanted you to know I appreciate the help. Thanks! ] (]) 07:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


== Steward election ==
:::I know the policies and follow them. You and those like you, however, do not and you do everything you can to subvert them and game the system. Then to protect yourselves from criticism, you throw out baseless accusations which you cannot back up with evidence and get your admin buddies to block anyone who disagrees with you. ] 02:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


Hello, could you please confirm the account on Meta is you, by providing a link to your userpage there, otherwise your vote will not count. Thanks. ''']]]''' 03:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
== FIRST ==
:To elaborate this is called crosslinking... Anyway you need to crosslink your account. You can do this by doing an edit here (to your user page, perhaps) saying you have an account on Meta named Crockspot, and then on Meta, giving the diff of that post (about the account) on en saying it is you on en. Or you can if you want set up a fullblown ] like my userpage on Meta references. (it's really best that it is something that one does for ones self). Once you do this it also counts for board elections. ++]: ]/] 03:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
::I'll take care of that right now. Thanks for the heads up. - ] (]) 03:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


== Merry Christmas ==


] 06:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)]]
Ok, first '''show me''' how the word "baseless" is uncivil. Is it a curse word? Is it a racial slur of some kind? Is it sexist? Does it impugn your heritage or perspicacity? Does it cast terrible aspersions over your character? Does it constitute an attack on your personally?


Perhaps I am just dense, because I do not see it. Please educate me on how the word "baseless" is uncivil. Is the word "groundless" also uncivil? How about the phrase "without merit"? Are you really saying that anyone who disagrees with you and your agenda in any way shape or form whatsoever is to be condemned as uncivil and vilified? Please do enlighten us as to what you really mean and why you said it. This is quite interesting. I honestly had no idea that the word "baseless" was a form of invective or an expletive. I have never seen it listed as such, however, I could be mistaken. Please direct me to reference works where the word "baseless" is so listed.


Crockspot
Drawing from the American Heritage Dictionary, I see that uncivil is the same as discourteous or rude. So it was discourteous to use the word baseless? It was rude? I can assume that if I use the word baseless on network television that word would be bleeped out? Is it on the list of forbidden words of network television and radio censors? Is it on the list of deprecated words and expressions compiled by the ]? Please provide references for this, if you claim it since I have never heard of it before. Has anyone ever been sued for the use of the word "baseless"?


Did you ever get that Administrator designation? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Politicians with Military service==
I see from the article on ] that "Wikipedians define incivility roughly as personally targeted behavior that causes an atmosphere of greater conflict and stress. " So saying your remarks and complaints were baseless caused you stress? It encouraged conflict? So I should have just let you do whatever you wanted, since otherwise there would be conflict? Any opposition causes conflict and therefore is uncivil? Is that the definition of uncivil in this context? Are you sure you want to press this further?
Hello there. on ]... when we were debating the merits of categories of American politicians who were military veterans, you made the request that even if the categories were deleted, the pages listed ahould be added to "American veteran politicians". It's a shame nobody listened to you because a lot of the work I did was on pages for veterens that had not been added to a military category. I've been meaning to do this for, well a year I guess, but I'm finally going back into my own edit history and adding ] to the pages that don't have it. I'm not going into the child categories so maybe someone can sort the pages down to various wars or branches later on. Anways... that was a good suggestion.... just wanted to let you know it didn't fall on deaf ears.--] (]) 17:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007) ==
Here is what the Misplaced Pages article on civility says:
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small>


==Combat Infantryman Badge==
'''Petty examples''' that contribute to an uncivil environment:
I was not in the military , and I understand you were. I have a question re the AFD ]. This guy won that badge in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam, and was one of only 303 to have won 3 of them. Would that have required that he was actually exposed to enemy fire, as opposed to being in theater? Thanks. ] (]) 00:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


==The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)==
* Rudeness
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 01:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008) ==
So is the word "baseless" rude? Please explain to me how it is rude.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 04:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008) ==
* Judgmental tone in edit summaries ("snipped rambling crap")
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 03:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008) ==
Did I do this? I do not believe I did. If you think the comment about a dictionary was in this category, I assure you it was not intended as such. It was mildly sarcastic since I cannot believe you are charging me with incivility for use of the word "baseless". Frankly, I think your charges of incivility are "baseless". And I challenge you to file an RfC on this issue if you want to see what others think.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 00:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)</small>


== Come on back! ==


Don't stay away forever! --] (]) 01:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
* <span id="ICA" />Ill-considered accusations of impropriety of one kind or another (cite as ])


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008) ==
Is this what use of the word "baseless" is? If so, I do not see it. Please explain how this could be true.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 00:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)</small>
* Starting a comment with: "Not to make this personal, but..."


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008) ==
I did not do this, did I?
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 18:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008) ==
* Lies
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 00:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008) ==
Did I say you were lying when I used the word "baseless"? I do not think so, but maybe I missed something. Please show me where I am wrong.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008) ==
* Calling someone a liar, or accusing him/her of slander or libel. Even if true, such remarks tend to aggravate rather than resolve a dispute.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 00:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008) ==
Does the use of the word "baseless" fall in this category? I do not think so, but maybe I am wrong. Please show me how.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 23:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 17:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008) ==
More '''serious examples''' include:
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 02:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009) ==
* ]
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 03:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009) ==
Is the word "baseless" used as a common taunt? Maybe some schoolyard bullies use this word to taunt others? I never heard of kids chanting "baseless" repeatedly but maybe I had a sheltered upbringing.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009) ==
* ]
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 02:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009) ==
How is the word "baseless" a personal attack?
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009) ==
** Racial, ethnic, sexual, and religious slurs
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009) ==
Is the word "baseless" a racial, ethnic, sexual or religious slur? If so, please explain how.
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)</small>


* ] directed at another contributor


I've read that you retired from commenting, but i can't find any other contributers to the Swiftboating that are still users, and that would appreciate the irony present in the Nurse Nayirah article. Could you at least point it out to someone else who would appreciate the irony? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Is the word "baseless" a profanity?


== Welcome back ==
* Defacing user pages


Or is this a temporary visit? ] <small>(])</small> 21:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Did I deface your use page?
*Hey, thanks. Just noodling around a little. ] (]) 21:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
::Hey there! I'd love to see you around more, too! --] (]) 00:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
:::Dude! It's been a while. Hope to see you around more as well. ;-) ] <small>]/]</small> 00:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 19:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009) ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 23:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)</small>

==Test your ] knowledge with the ]!==
]
As a member of the ] or ], you may be interested in competing in the ] International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for ], the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up ], read up on the rules ], and discuss the contest ]!<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 18:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009) ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 18:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009) ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 20:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009) ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 02:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010) ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 03:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)</small>

== Kerry Katona (again) ==

Nude photos have (again) become 'topless test shots'. Can you help? --] (]) 12:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 19:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010) ==
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010) ==
{{WPMILHIST Newsletter header|LII|June 2010| }}
{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Project news</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Articles</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Members</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Editorial</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: center; font-size: 85%; " |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section ].
|}
<small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 18:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010) ==
{{WPMILHIST Newsletter header|LIII|July 2010| }}
{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Project news</font></big>
]

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Articles</font></big>
]

|-
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Members</font></big>
]

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Editorial</font></big>
]

|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: center; font-size: 85%; " |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section ].
|}
<small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)</small>

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010) ==
{{WPMILHIST Newsletter header|LIV|August 2010| }}
{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Project news</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Articles</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Members</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Editorial</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: center; font-size: 85%; " |
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 23:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
|}

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010) ==
{{WPMILHIST Newsletter header|LV|September 2010| }}
{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Project news</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Articles</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 50%;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Members</font></big>
'']''

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
; <big><font color=steelblue>Editorial</font></big>
'']''

|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: center; font-size: 85%; " |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 21:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
|}

== ''The Bugle'': Issue LVI, October 2010 ==

{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; ">''']'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project News: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Members: '']''
* Editorial: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<span style="font-size: 85%;">
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 22:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)</span>

== ''The Bugle'': Issue LVII, November 2010 ==

{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; ">''']'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project News: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Members: '']''
* Editorial: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<span style="font-size: 85%;">
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 22:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)</span>

== ''The Bugle'': Issue LVIII, December 2010 ==
{| style="width: 100%;"
| valign="top" align="center" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
|-
| <center>]</center><br/>
----
<div style="font-size: 15pt; font-family: Times New Roman; text-align: center; ">]</div>
----<br />
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Times New Roman; text-align: center; ">] &bull; ]<p>] &bull; ]
</div>
|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; font-family: Times New Roman; text-align: center; font-size: 85%; " |
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. Past editions may be viewed ]. ] (]) 20:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|}
|}


== ''The Bugle'': Volume LVIX, January 2011 ==
* Giving users derogatory names via ''Pagemove vandalism''


{| style="width: 100%;"
Did I do this?
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; ">''']'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project News: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Members: '']''
* Editorial: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<span style="font-size: 85%;">
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 15:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)</span>


== ''The Bugle'': Issue LX, February 2011 ==
* Indecent suggestions


{| style="width: 100%;"
Does the use of the word "baseless" constitute an indecent suggestion? Please show how this is true.
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; ">''']'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project News: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Members: '']''
* Editorial: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<span style="font-size: 85%;">
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the ]. ] (]) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)</span>


== Rest in peace, my friend ==
I am at a loss here. My goodness...--] 02:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


"I have been, and always shall be, your friend."
:*It wasn't the word you used, it was how you presented that word, stating your opinion as unqualified fact. "Your complaints are baseless." That personalizes the dispute. You should have said, "I disagree strongly with your complaints/argument/rationale". Get it? You have now further personalized the dispute by making an assumption that I am promoting my religion. You don't know anything about my religious beliefs. In fact, I really don't have any, beyond believing in some sort of higher power in the universe. I'm not religious at all. Your statement violates AGF. I suggest you back off, and let the RfC run it's course, because you are digging a hole that FM will not be able to save you from. - ] 03:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
--Spock <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== ] ==
Good heavens. Now a barely veiled threat...Well I certainly apologize for offending you. I am completely confused about what I did that was so vile, especially since I did '''not''' say your complaints ARE baseless, but that they APPEAR baseless. Maybe I should throw a few more weasel words in there, and say something like "possibly maybe in my opinion your arguments might appear to be baseless but I am not sure". Let me state again, without any reservation I apologize unequivocally for somehow having stepped over a bound of propriety by stating that your complaints APPEAR baseless. I now know that it is improper to ever disagree with you. Fair enough. I stand corrected.--] 04:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
==The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] 03:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)</small>

Latest revision as of 14:01, 14 March 2023


R       E       T       I       R       E        D
This user is tired of silly drama on Misplaced Pages.

If you need me, I'm at Wikinfo. Crockspot 06:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

In case you want to add your 2 cents

I see you're retired (but you voted on the ArbComm elections page), but just FYI, I started an Incident report you might be interested in here. If not, that's fine. I won't drag you into something you don't want to deal with. Thanks for the defense the past couple days, too. 67.135.49.177 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

No thanks. I see you have caught a one month block under a dubious policy rationale. Not surprised with the amount of bullshit and smearing that has been shoveled. Crockspot 20:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

If anyone cares

See my user page for a rundown of why I am no longer contributing. - Crockspot 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

While I might not have agreed with you on much, there is a bit of drama here; i would have hoped you would try and change things, but perhaps it's not worth your time; to each his own. I suppose your new home will be a bit more sympathetic, but enjoy it nonetheless. David Fuchs 00:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. The environment there is more conducive to people leaving each other alone, but Fred is still a stickler for not allowing "made up" stuff that isn't reliably sourced, so hopefully it will strike a good balance. My main focus will be on expanding the content (starting with WP's featured content), getting rid of redlinks, filling in all the missing templates, and keeping the school kids from screwing things up. There is a lot to do there just getting the basics taken care of, so I don't even have an interest in getting involved in content pushing matches. I'll be around here pretty much every day grabbing something or other to add over there. Misplaced Pages is a great resource for not having to reinvent the wheel. - Crockspot (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you for your taking the time to comment on my RfA - see Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Wassupwestcoast. I've added comments that might clarify some of the issues you had concerns with. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Pseudo-Welcome back

I saw you were back and wondered what the heck you were up to. Anyway, welcome back to the love fest that is WP :) spryde | talk 21:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm trying to keep my mainspace edits to a bare minimum, basically keeping an eye on the lesser watched articles on my watchlist, but I will be getting involved in discussions in WP and User talk namespace. I am on WP constantly because of the adaptation of content to Wikinfo, so it's hard not to notice things going on. - Crockspot (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hannity

I saw your refs on the Sean Hannity page, nice job. After reading about the previous problems you've had on here, I wanted you to know I appreciate the help. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Steward election

Hello, could you please confirm the account on Meta is you, by providing a link to your userpage there, otherwise your vote will not count. Thanks. Redrocketboy 03:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

To elaborate this is called crosslinking... Anyway you need to crosslink your account. You can do this by doing an edit here (to your user page, perhaps) saying you have an account on Meta named Crockspot, and then on Meta, giving the diff of that post (about the account) on en saying it is you on en. Or you can if you want set up a fullblown WikiMatrix like my userpage on Meta references. (it's really best that it is something that one does for ones self). Once you do this it also counts for board elections. ++Lar: t/c 03:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll take care of that right now. Thanks for the heads up. - Crockspot (talk) 03:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wishing you the very best for the season - Guettarda 06:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


Crockspot

Did you ever get that Administrator designation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.12.67 (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Politicians with Military service

Hello there. on December 12, 2006... when we were debating the merits of categories of American politicians who were military veterans, you made the request that even if the categories were deleted, the pages listed ahould be added to "American veteran politicians". It's a shame nobody listened to you because a lot of the work I did was on pages for veterens that had not been added to a military category. I've been meaning to do this for, well a year I guess, but I'm finally going back into my own edit history and adding Category:American military personnel to the pages that don't have it. I'm not going into the child categories so maybe someone can sort the pages down to various wars or branches later on. Anways... that was a good suggestion.... just wanted to let you know it didn't fall on deaf ears.--Dr who1975 (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Combat Infantryman Badge

I was not in the military , and I understand you were. I have a question re the AFD Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Leo J. Meyer. This guy won that badge in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam, and was one of only 303 to have won 3 of them. Would that have required that he was actually exposed to enemy fire, as opposed to being in theater? Thanks. Edison (talk) 00:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Come on back!

Don't stay away forever! --BenBurch (talk) 01:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


I've read that you retired from commenting, but i can't find any other contributers to the Swiftboating that are still users, and that would appreciate the irony present in the Nurse Nayirah article. Could you at least point it out to someone else who would appreciate the irony? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.166.14.146 (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back

Or is this a temporary visit? Gamaliel (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey there! I'd love to see you around more, too! --BenBurch (talk) 00:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Dude! It's been a while. Hope to see you around more as well. ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Kerry Katona (again)

Nude photos have (again) become 'topless test shots'. Can you help? --80.192.21.253 (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Misplaced Pages

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010


Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010

From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards

Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Rest in peace, my friend

"I have been, and always shall be, your friend." --Spock — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.229.89 (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)