Revision as of 07:15, 3 December 2007 editRichard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users195,161 edits →Image copyright problem with Image:Tandberg.Ollie.jpg← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:08, 26 December 2024 edit undoMike Selinker (talk | contribs)Administrators110,501 edits Notification: listing of Category:Pyne banking family at WP:Categories for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
] | |||
{{message}} | |||
] | |||
==Deleted mayor tables== | |||
*] | |||
*] (deleted) | |||
*] (deleted) | |||
*] (deleted) | |||
*] (deleted) | |||
*] (deleted) | |||
*] | |||
== September 2024 == | |||
Hi! ''']''' to ]! | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:var(--background-color-destructive-subtle, #fee7e6); border:1px solid var(--border-color-warning, #a66200); color:inherit; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ]. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has {{em|also}} been revoked.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then submit a request to the '']''. ] ] 19:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
:The reason I have done this is that it has been six years since you were blocked, with no appeals that I am aware of. While we do allow blocked users some latitude on their own talk page, just coming by to delete things off your talk page without even attempting to get unblocked over such a long period of time just seems unproductive and frankly, unhealthy. | |||
Hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. ]. Here are some links that you might find useful: | |||
:Note that as a community-imposed block, UTRS can only re-grant talk page access, it cannot lift the block. If you aren't planning to try and appeal the block, please just move on. ] ] 19:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
* Try the ]. If you have less time, try ]. | |||
* To sign your posts (on ], ] page etc.) use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type <nowiki>~~~</nowiki> (3 tildes). | |||
* You can experiment in the ]. | |||
* You can get help at the ] | |||
* Some other pages that will help you know more about Misplaced Pages: ] and ], ], ], ], ] | |||
* If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at ]. | |||
Having consulted {{u|Just Step Sideways}}, I shall restore your talk page access. However, I have also declined {{UTRS|93760}}, and my advice to you is that making another unblock request is almost certain to be a waste of your time and anyone else's time who reviews the request. As I said at UTRS, your recent history at Wikidata does not encourage me to think that unblocking you would be constructive, and I really can't see any likelihood at all that a community discussion would lead to unblocking. ] (]) 22:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Location == | |||
== Your Service Award == | |||
I'm in the DC area (in fact, I just signed up for the DC meetup on December 9th). -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] </font> ] 19:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{Sagacious Editor}} | |||
:No, haven't eaten at Marrakesh. My wife and I have only been in the DC area for about a year and a half; she works downtown (actually, not to far from that restaurant) but we live in Silver Spring, so we don't eat in the city that often. Can't say that we're into Moroccan food, possibly because of the belly dancers, possibly because the last time we ate at such a restaurant, years ago (in Northern California) a waiter spilled several glasses of water on my wife's plate of food. -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] </font> ] 19:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{Ephoros}} | |||
Hi there Mr Norton. I came across you totally at random. Looks like you've run into some unpleasantness. That sucks, and you have my sympathy. That doesn't mean I have any idea who did what or why or when or whose fault it was. Just that, right or wrong, it sure sucks to get piled on so heavily and then shown the door after being here so long. I do feel badly for you. | |||
On the merits, quick glance shows that you seem to have some fair points about some things at least. But we'll not talk about that now. | |||
== TfD nomination of ] == | |||
] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — ''']''' <small>''']'''</small> 19:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
''Any''ways, when I made the ] awards, I was adamant that they applied to everyone the same, always, whether you were banned, dead, serving ten to twenty in the Iowa State Penitentiary, or anything else. No political considerations can ever enter into it. Therefore allow me to award you your current service award. You are at an extremely high level, highest I've seen. I'm sure that, regardless of anything else, that you have made many valuable contributions to the project, and I thank you for your service. | |||
== Image:08lederberg_lg.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ]<sup><font color="#CC5500">]</font></sup> 13:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> | |||
I have some ideas for a possible appeal if you want one, contact me. Regardless, godspeed and dread nought. ] (]) 02:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Image:Peggycourt.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
: - A well deserved award. RAN's titanic contributions to human knowledge will continue to benefit humanity for at least as long as there's an internet. ] (]) 13:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ]<sup><font color="#CC5500">]</font></sup> 13:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> | |||
* Thanks! I was just blocked at Wikidata after asking a new Admin guy to restore some items deleted out-of-process, that were created by a third party, their response was to permaban '''me''' without any warning. See: ] If anyone con contact someone from the WMF and send them the link to the ban, it would be helpful. | |||
::- The noticeboard discussion you linked to is truly shocking. Sadly my contacts at WMF have long since left (not that they were ever able to assist much with reigning in permabanners or even with memorializing fallen heroes.) I hope someone else is able to help, or if not I guess maybe you could take your talent & energies to a ], at least for a while. There are changes underway in the collective unconscious; it's possible in another five years or so, Misplaced Pages will once again be relatively hospitable for inclusionists. PS - unfortunately, it's probably best not to reply. Deleting messages from your talk page is one thing, but there are admins who might see taking part in any sort of conversation that's not about getting yourself unblocked (on this project – not on other projects) as a reason to revoke Talk Page access. PPS Hope you saw Herostratus's kind offer to contact them about ideas for appeal, maybe there will be some way for them to help if you email them. ] (]) 16:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{ping|FeydHuxtable}} Wikidata does not have much patience for the amount of haggling and divisivity he was engaging in and pushing, respectively. To be frank, Wikidata rejects the concept of ] and consequently, no one is given a pass for the content work they have done or could do. The foundation respects that and will not intervene. Richard was given multiple chances to fairly appeal their block and instead continued to try to sow divisibility by listing users on his userpage as holding views they did not necessarily hold.--] ] 16:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
* I think he is referring to keeping track of the permaban/deletion debate by listing people with a more liberal view of Wikidata:Notability and inclusion, and linking to their arguments; and listing people with a more conservative view of Wikidata:Notability, and exclusion and linking to their arguments. Somehow this is seen as sinister. They also objected to me linking to the archived permaban debate on my talk page, it has been removed twice now, and I am now blocked from using my Wikidata talk page. The rational was that adding the link to the debate was "misuse" of my talk page. Remember this all started by ] asking that several Wikidata entries be restored that were deleted out-of-process. ] (]) 16:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Merry Christmas! == | ||
] (]) 19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)]] | |||
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
|} <!-- ], ] --> --] <sup>]</sup>⁄<sub>]</sub> <small>• 17:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
*Congrats on the DYK! The nomination was my idea, but the credit for the creation of the article belongs to you. ] 20:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Very nice.] 10:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Step 3 of a DRV says "Inform the administrator who deleted the page by adding the following on their user talk page: <nowiki>{{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}}</nowiki>". Please bother to do so in future. ] ] 16:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Access date== | |||
I've tried several different variations of the date in this citation and they all come up as either a redlink or as it did here . Do you have any other ideas of how to fix it? ] 16:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Page names == | |||
I appreciate the work your doing cleaning up and improving biographies. However I'm a bit mystified by some renamings. You moved "]" to "]" despite every source calling her just "Glenda Green". You moved "]" to "]", again despite that being a very rare usage. I think that ] and ] call on us to use the most common name. When there's a conflict it's best to append a qualifier (for example "Edward Weston (photographer)" rather than adding in unsed middle names. Am I wrong in believing that's standard practice? ]] ] 22:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Well, I move the article name already for you, since the above user is right about the naming convention. Hope you don't mind. <font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">] <sub>]]</sub></font> 02:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== References == | |||
Just a friendly note. Your reference for ] in ] is not a good one, since it requires people to log in. So people without an account might not be able to look at it. <font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">] <sub>]]</sub></font> 02:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== image query == | |||
Hi, I am wanting to move ] to commons so that it can be used on ]. However, I dont see any evidence that it has been licensed under CC on the mentioned source http://earlyaviators.com . Could you clarify please.. ] 10:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
I will ask Ernie, the copyright holder to forward a letter to me again. Sadly I lost my hotmail archive, when Microsoft deleted my account for not logging in often enough. I lost 10 years of emails. | |||
== Genealogy wiki == | |||
Check your watchlist on the genealogy wiki. Now that I've played around with Misplaced Pages, I finally understand the powerfulness of the Wiki concept. Made some contributions. Will expand.] 10:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==An application of BIO== | |||
I got involved in ] at AfD. Can you look at the references and let me know whether you think I'm right on his notability. He is not an important topic, but this illustrates an important application of the BIO and Notability rules. I think that the Minnesota Public Radio spot is just about enough, then the mention in PC World, while not in-depth clearly is saying this person is noticed. The other comixtalk source is marginal, but I think that it adds to credibilty. It appeares that Comixtalk has a blog section, but where he is covered is more akin to an online magazine in a scheduled and dated issue. Cheers! --] 15:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Clem == | |||
Please hold off on restoring the note until we can talk a bit. At minimum these are creating confusion in the AfD. --] 17:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
I have mixed feelings on referencing to a subject's site. In this case, I think that it is over done. Since we do not allow autobiography, there is a fine line when we reference to autobiographies. I don't want to prohibit referencing to the sites of subjects, but how do we set objective standards? --] 17:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC) (1956 - ?) | |||
I'm not a big advocate for prohibition of autobio ofr referece, just see limits as appropriate. If you read throught the AfD on CLem though there is opposition. I'll read through ]. ] requires independence for establishing notability, but that does no specifically effect the references. | |||
A proble that I have seen at AfD is that through either cunning or ignorance, proponents for deletion attack the weak references to cloud the strength of the good references. In defending article against AfD in the past, I've found that removing the weak references gives an article a better chance of surviving the AfD as the focus moves from red herrings to logic. WP is not a perfect world, but off the golf course there is no perfect world, and on the course there are few perfect strokes. --] 17:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Richard, please take a look at the section which I added to the bottom of the AfD at Mitch Clem. I'm not seeing any guideline to refute your position. However, I do think that we can over footnote to obscure the forrest with trees. --] 18:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:: PS: I will revert my removal of the notes but put them into a separate "Notes" section which segrates these from references. --] 18:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==In Remembrance...== | |||
<imagemap> Image:Lest We Forget.png|450px|left | |||
rect 1 1 1027 747 ] | |||
desc none </imagemap><br clear=all> | |||
--] <sup>] <span class="plainlinks"></span> ]</sup> 17:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
]], an article you created, has been nominated for ]. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ] satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "]" and the ]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">] <sub>]]</sub></font> 00:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Hope you don't take this personal. But I think it has no content. Sorry. <font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">] <sub>]]</sub></font> 00:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:RobertBuck book.jpg)== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 02:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Albertfish-full.jpg)== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 02:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks for saving the article! == | |||
Hello, Mr. Norton, and thanks for attempting to save my ]! For that, I give you this barnstar: <br> | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For tirelessly improving the article and saving it from deletion, I owe you one! So, here it is, the Tireless Contributor Barnstar! --]]]]] 02:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
==]== | |||
I've been following that afd also, it all seems very heated. Since it was only nominated 3 days ago, maybe, just maybe a consensus can still be reached, here's hoping anyways. -- ] (]) 20:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== == ]== == | |||
Quote from bottom of AFD - "Comment I agree with Agavtouch that one needs only to match just a few of the users who voted Keep here with the client list of 5W Public Relations which is listed on Misplaced Pages as adverts. It is a sad sham. Also transparent spin tactics used by the employees of 5W Public Relations to attempt to divert attention and attack those who have voted delete from the many gross and documented violations of SPAM and NPOV committed by Torossian and his paid employees. Lastly, please note how Torossian & Co. continue to delete any mention on this article of the New York Post news story illustrating malice and bad faith created by Torossian against the NYC PR industry. Not very objective. Heathspic (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)" | |||
* Perhaps you can add ]'s ] piece to the delete page, I am not certain ] and ] are aware of it. | |||
*** | |||
*I come to you realizing here too that maybe I should no longer be involved, but this has become more of a circus and an exhibit into Wiki tolerance. I invite you to scrutinize any of my edits. While placing an article about something I have involvement with may be seen by some as a blatant Wiki violation, I also know that many articles are started by people who have deep knowledge, hobby interest, or first hand experience with a topic, even if there is no financial interest, it is a closeness that drives the piece. If done right and notability is there, there is nothing wrong with it as I see it. Being open about it helps too. I know that these three parties to the deletion are a person with little Wiki concern and a huge axe to grind. I have edited and added articles for a year and a half on many topics, most of which I am familiar with and have researched. Thank you. ] (]) 18:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Copy edit == | |||
I copy edited ] and renominated it. I think you could improve your GAC success with a few minor pointers. You do excellent research. I’ll throw out 2 grammatical pointers and 2 ] pointers: | |||
#<nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags should follow a punctuation with no space between and follow each other with no space between | |||
#Alphabetize your categories | |||
#Don’t split your noun verb constructions. I.E., Then, he went is preferred to He then went. | |||
#Another big improvement might be found at ]. Think about your independent and dependent phrases. Independent phrases are joined either by a semicolon or a comma and a conjunction. However, if they are not both independent just a conjunction is necessary. I.e, either “He did this and that.” or “He did this, and he did that.” | |||
I would be glad to copy edit another of your articles that has not yet made GA. Who is the most important aviator on your list or the article you think could benefit most from a copy edit?--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 22:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Will look at ]. My example before was not that good. Actually, a better example is either “He did this first and did that afterwards.” or “He did this first, and he did that afterwards.” This is a better example because the previous example was a list of two things versus two independent phrases. This is an independent and dependent phrase versus two independents. Basically, see if a phrase has both a noun and a verb. If so, it is independent and needs to be conjoined accordingly with other independent phrases. If it is verb lacking a subject it relies on a subject from another phrase and is thus dependent. The lower of the two edits is a good example. The one at the top sounds incorrect because whiile is an awkward conjunction. I may even be wrong, but I am going with the conjunction rule as I understand it. Anyways, my advice to you would be to pay attention to where your independent phrases are when you write and you will probably seem like a better writer. Anyways, I am off to look at Wallenberg.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 16:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::That page is pretty well conjoined. I am going to have to go back and look at my GMAT prep book to remember some more complicated referent rules to do a better copy edit on that page, but will do so in the next few weeks. I am going to brush up on my copyediting and this page is a great challenge. I will do what I can with the rules I remember right now.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 16:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::Back to O'Malley. What kind of was he. Did he operate a subway train or was he engaged in ]?--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 16:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == | |||
] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | |||
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
|- | |||
|valign=top| | |||
;Stubs:<!--''']:'''--> | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|align=top| | |||
;Cleanup | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Merge | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Add Sources | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Wikify | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Expand | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|} | |||
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping. | |||
If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from ], SuggestBot's caretaker. | |||
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on ]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ] (]) 15:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Raoul Wallenberg == | |||
In all I have spent about 2 hours with ]. I think that it is destined for ]. It requires editorial skills I do not excel at to retain its ]. It needs someone to chop out things or track down proper refs for large chunks of unsourced text. It needs to have several {{tl|fact}} tags added. I had volunteered for an article that is grammatical duress. I am not good at tracking down other people's sources. Therefore, I mostly work on articles from redlink or stub class. I can spend more time with the article, but my efforts will not save it. If you have anything that is more in need of grammatical repair, I could probably help in a way that would more likely lead to a promotion. However, I am willing to stick with this article.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 22:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Fair use rationale for ]== | |||
] | |||
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is no ] as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the ], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found ]. | |||
Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale --> ] (]) 18:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Image copyright problem with Image:01298v.jpg== | |||
] | |||
Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ]. | |||
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation. ] (]) 06:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Your edits to ]== | |||
{{{icon|] }}}Please do not add content without ] ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:List of vaporware|, as you did to ]}}. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with ] please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> -- ] <small>]]</small> 09:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Coot dab page == | |||
You "Coot, a derogatory term for an elderly man" at ], but you may have missed my previous removal rationale. "Elderly man" is covered by the link to wiktionary. Disambiguation pages disambiguate between articles (]), but there is no ] article. Furthermore, ]. I'll undo your edit again. Just to keep you informed. :-) – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 10:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Fictional universe AFDs == | |||
Hi. | |||
While my personal views upon the subject differ from yours, I think you might find useful if you haven't used it before - and you're more or less right, 29 (30 if you count Beowulf) of the top 100 right now (taking out the Main Page) most viewed articles are contemparary fiction (although very few episodes that actually get into the top 200, and those that do are normally Doctor Who episodes) ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 16:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Handbra== | |||
An article on which you previously commented has been proposed for deletion again, at ]. You may wish to comment.''']''' (]) 03:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Poon-Lim.jpg== | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 17:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Copyright violation == | |||
I was disturbed to see that, at 23:08, 17 March 2007 you added a copyright violation to Misplaced Pages, in the form of copying text from http://www.nypl.org/research/chss/grd/resguides/biography/geographical.html into the article ]. What were you thinking? You seem to be a long time, reasonably sane Wikipedian; it saddens me to see such things. I've deleted the page, and assuming I can find a second online description of the topic, I'll write a new stub for it, but, I wish I didn't have to. Please don't do this sort of thing again, and do mark any ones you've done in the past for deletion; we don't have to steal. ] 05:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away! == | |||
<div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px; vertical-align: middle;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
<!--Begin message--> | |||
{{{1|] ]/]}}} has given you a kitten! Kittens promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send '''kittens''' to others by adding {{tls|Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
</div> ] ]/] 18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi, this article was a wreck. I didn't have much time, but I tried to make some fairly radical changes to bring it back to a decent state, after a series of edits by Attila Lajos (who wrote his PhD thesis on Wallenberg ) that gave the article a rather non-neutral point of view. I hope that I can draw some attention to it so that you or someone else can give it the time it deserves. –] 21:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Hi, thanks for the quick response. It is not only that his English isn't good, but that he is in fact making the argument, in the article, that Wallenberg's importance in the Hungarian Holocaust rescue is vastly overstated. This diverges radically from most of the published information I am able to find about Wallenberg on the web. Disregarding whether his edits count as original research, and leaving aside the fact that I don't have any idea what the truth of the matter is, but if Lajos's points are to be included in the article at all, they must be presented ''in contrast'' to the conventional viewpoint, rather than replace it ''in toto''. –] 21:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:08, 26 December 2024
Deleted mayor tables
- Mayor of East Newark, New Jersey
- Mayor of Nutley, New Jersey (deleted)
- Mayor of Aberdeen Township, New Jersey (deleted)
- Mayor of Verona, New Jersey (deleted)
- Mayor of Absecon, New Jersey (deleted)
- Mayors of Bergenfield, New Jersey (deleted)
- Mayor of Long Branch, New Jersey
September 2024
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Just Step Sideways 19:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)- The reason I have done this is that it has been six years since you were blocked, with no appeals that I am aware of. While we do allow blocked users some latitude on their own talk page, just coming by to delete things off your talk page without even attempting to get unblocked over such a long period of time just seems unproductive and frankly, unhealthy.
- Note that as a community-imposed block, UTRS can only re-grant talk page access, it cannot lift the block. If you aren't planning to try and appeal the block, please just move on. Just Step Sideways 19:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Having consulted Just Step Sideways, I shall restore your talk page access. However, I have also declined UTRS appeal #93760, and my advice to you is that making another unblock request is almost certain to be a waste of your time and anyone else's time who reviews the request. As I said at UTRS, your recent history at Wikidata does not encourage me to think that unblocking you would be constructive, and I really can't see any likelihood at all that a community discussion would lead to unblocking. JBW (talk) 22:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Your Service Award
Hi there Mr Norton. I came across you totally at random. Looks like you've run into some unpleasantness. That sucks, and you have my sympathy. That doesn't mean I have any idea who did what or why or when or whose fault it was. Just that, right or wrong, it sure sucks to get piled on so heavily and then shown the door after being here so long. I do feel badly for you.
On the merits, quick glance shows that you seem to have some fair points about some things at least. But we'll not talk about that now.
Anyways, when I made the WP:SERVICE awards, I was adamant that they applied to everyone the same, always, whether you were banned, dead, serving ten to twenty in the Iowa State Penitentiary, or anything else. No political considerations can ever enter into it. Therefore allow me to award you your current service award. You are at an extremely high level, highest I've seen. I'm sure that, regardless of anything else, that you have made many valuable contributions to the project, and I thank you for your service.
I have some ideas for a possible appeal if you want one, contact me. Regardless, godspeed and dread nought. Herostratus (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- - A well deserved award. RAN's titanic contributions to human knowledge will continue to benefit humanity for at least as long as there's an internet. FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I was just blocked at Wikidata after asking a new Admin guy to restore some items deleted out-of-process, that were created by a third party, their response was to permaban me without any warning. See: Wikidata:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive/2024/09#h-Q126487673-20240910172200 If anyone con contact someone from the WMF and send them the link to the ban, it would be helpful.
- - The noticeboard discussion you linked to is truly shocking. Sadly my contacts at WMF have long since left (not that they were ever able to assist much with reigning in permabanners or even with memorializing fallen heroes.) I hope someone else is able to help, or if not I guess maybe you could take your talent & energies to a non WMF project, at least for a while. There are changes underway in the collective unconscious; it's possible in another five years or so, Misplaced Pages will once again be relatively hospitable for inclusionists. PS - unfortunately, it's probably best not to reply. Deleting messages from your talk page is one thing, but there are admins who might see taking part in any sort of conversation that's not about getting yourself unblocked (on this project – not on other projects) as a reason to revoke Talk Page access. PPS Hope you saw Herostratus's kind offer to contact them about ideas for appeal, maybe there will be some way for them to help if you email them. FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @FeydHuxtable: Wikidata does not have much patience for the amount of haggling and divisivity he was engaging in and pushing, respectively. To be frank, Wikidata rejects the concept of vested contributors and consequently, no one is given a pass for the content work they have done or could do. The foundation respects that and will not intervene. Richard was given multiple chances to fairly appeal their block and instead continued to try to sow divisibility by listing users on his userpage as holding views they did not necessarily hold.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- - The noticeboard discussion you linked to is truly shocking. Sadly my contacts at WMF have long since left (not that they were ever able to assist much with reigning in permabanners or even with memorializing fallen heroes.) I hope someone else is able to help, or if not I guess maybe you could take your talent & energies to a non WMF project, at least for a while. There are changes underway in the collective unconscious; it's possible in another five years or so, Misplaced Pages will once again be relatively hospitable for inclusionists. PS - unfortunately, it's probably best not to reply. Deleting messages from your talk page is one thing, but there are admins who might see taking part in any sort of conversation that's not about getting yourself unblocked (on this project – not on other projects) as a reason to revoke Talk Page access. PPS Hope you saw Herostratus's kind offer to contact them about ideas for appeal, maybe there will be some way for them to help if you email them. FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think he is referring to keeping track of the permaban/deletion debate by listing people with a more liberal view of Wikidata:Notability and inclusion, and linking to their arguments; and listing people with a more conservative view of Wikidata:Notability, and exclusion and linking to their arguments. Somehow this is seen as sinister. They also objected to me linking to the archived permaban debate on my talk page, it has been removed twice now, and I am now blocked from using my Wikidata talk page. The rational was that adding the link to the debate was "misuse" of my talk page. Remember this all started by Wikidata:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive/2024/09#h-Q126487673-20240910172200 asking that several Wikidata entries be restored that were deleted out-of-process. RAN (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Category:Pyne banking family has been nominated for renaming
Category:Pyne banking family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)