Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ancient Macedonian language: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:12, 29 June 2005 editAlex '05 (talk | contribs)15,289 edits →Anti-nationalist hoax← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:47, 8 June 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 38 discussion(s) to Talk:Ancient Macedonian language/Archive 6, Talk:Ancient Macedonian language/Archive 5) (botTag: Replaced 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
New sections at bottom, please.
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=b|style=long}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Languages|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{Old peer review|archivelink=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Greece/Peer review/Ancient Macedonian language|date=April 2008}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(90d)
| archive = Talk:Ancient Macedonian language/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 6
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}


Archived talk: ] ==No proofs whatsoever that Ancient Macedonian was a different language from Ancient Greek==
As for the fact that sometimes Ancient Macedonian words (from Hesychius' glossary) "reveal voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates", meaning b,d,g, instead of ph, th, kh, a similar, yet not identical thing occurs in German, i.e. within the same language, between dialects of the same language: Low German lopen vs. (High/literary/standard) German laufen, Low German riek, German reich. This Ancient Macedonian shift constitutes by no means a proof that Ancient Macedonian was a different language from Ancient Greek. ] (]) 04:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
:The wording in the article is the result of much careful work from many editors. There is no evidence that the ] for the current wording has changed. --] (]) 05:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I just gave you the evidence above. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Where are you even getting this information from? Without an academic source on the matter (such as a study by a university press or accredited institution), this might as well be your personal blog and your fanciful opinion. Personally, I think the ancient Macedonian language was a dialect of Greek thanks to pieces of evidence like the ], but my opinion doesn't mean anything on Misplaced Pages, only cited material counts. For that matter, talk pages of articles are not forums for debate, they are venues for discussing how to improve the existing article. See ] among other things in ]. Taivo is right: this article represents the culmination of not only consensus among editors here, but also reflects scholarly opinion and academic consensus. <strong>]</strong><sup>]</sup> 17:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
...In sum, despite what we think about the matter, only the words and ideas of scholars and academics matter here, and some of them have radically different theories about the classification of the ancient Macedonian language. <strong>]</strong><sup>]</sup> 17:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
:::The Ancient Macedonian language from Hesychius' glossary looks different from the one of the Pella curse tablet. My opinion is we are talking about two different Greek dialects. The wikipedia article on Ancient Macedonian mentions that some of the words in Hesychius' glossary "reveal voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates", meaning b,d,g, instead of ph, th, kh which is no proof for its non-Greekness. A similar, yet not identical thing occurs in German, i.e. within the same language, between dialects of the same language: Low German lopen vs. (High/literary/standard) German laufen, Low German riek, German reich.
Who said we are not discussing how to improve the article? I was trying to insert this comparison with German language and I don't understand why it is constantly deleted. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::It will continue to be deleted as long as you don't provide a reliable published source for the claim.] · ] 16:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
::Did you not read my post at all? The '''single problem''' others are having with your edits is that they are completely without a source other than your opinion, apparently, since you have failed to provide us with any sort of inline citation quoting or citing an academic source. Unless your edit is based on information found in a book, journal article, or online page connected to a scholarly institution (university, library, museum, historical society, etc.) then I'm afraid your edits will be reverted for clearly violating ]. Since you basically talked right over me and failed to observe any of my points, I'll politely end the conversation here as well, since you seem incapable of having a normal conversation. --<strong>]</strong><sup>]</sup> 16:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Isn't there a rule against people that lack common sense and education like "Pericles of Athens"? He should be banned for breaking the rules. What do you mean "I am incapable of having a normal conversation"? Who do you think you are to allow yourself such a language towards me? Are you Greek? Or are you a Slavic so-called "Macedonian" impersonating a Greek? My comparison with German dialects is indeed an original research. So what? That's probably not the first time OR is inserted into wikipedia. It is a good argument in favor of the Greekness of Ancient Macedonian, so you should accept it, unless you are a non-Greek. A consonantal shift is no proof of a different language. That is what I wanted to emphasize. That there are no proofs that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect, even though some of its words show a consonant shift. That's no OR, stating that a consonant shift isn't enough to turn a dialect into a different language. Only the comparison with German (or any other language) is indeed an OR. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::It is not allowed to insert Original Research into articles, and while it has certainly been done before, it is our job as editors to remove it when we see it. So please do not insert it again, now that you have clearly understood that it is OR and therefore against the rules. No part of this argument can be added without support in reliable sources. Speculating about other editors ethnicity or using it as an argument is also against the rules by the way. So you need to find a very different approach here, or you will simply end up banned.] · ] 04:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
:::What you don't seem to understand, Graecophile, is that your personal opinion, no matter what data you base it on, is no more than personal opinion. Only the opinions of reliable sources matter. And, in this case, the reliable sources are mixed in their appraisals of how closely related to Ancient Greek the Ancient Macedonian language was. Scholarly opinion ranges from your nationalistic "It's simply Greek" to "It's not Attic Greek, but it's Doric Greek" to "It's not Greek, but it's close to Greek". So the article will continue to reflect the scholarly variation. That's the end of the matter until some future time when scholarly opinion might change. But it might not ever change without further evidence of the Ancient Macedonian language coming to light. --] (]) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
This is the exact quotation from the article page: "There are, however, a number of words that are not easily identifiable as Greek and reveal, for example, voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates". It refers to the Ancient Macedonian words of Hesychius' glossary. Since you people obviously lack the power to understand simple sentences I will say it again: the above quotation has no relevance, since there are many words in (for instance) German dialects that are not present in standard German and also there are consonantal shifts between dialects of German and standard German. Neither of those 2 is an argument for the non-Greekness of Ancient Macedonian. That should be stated in the article since the above quotation induces, suggests the idea that Ancient Macedonian might not have been Greek based on phony arguments. I hope I made myself clear now, although I am not sure, given your intellectual power. And stop calling me names and threatening me with being banned since I have done nothing to break the rules. If you want to ban somebody, ban "Pericles of Athens" for calling me stupid ("you obviously can't have a normal conversation"). You people are very rude, aggressive and abusive. It is not my fault that you can't understand simple phrases, but to call me names and threaten me at the same time, that is too much. I say it again: the above quotation's text is irrelevant and misleading, people who have no knowledge of linguistics, that is the vast majority of wikipedia users, are inclined to believe that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect, based on 2 phony arguments. The following text should be added to the quotation: "yet these are no conclusive arguments that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect" or "yet there are specific words and consonant shifts in many dialects of many languages". <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:Macedonian language it has nothing to do with the Greek language.I believe that everyone rights stories that feats there narrative! I can’t believe it everything that I read in the Misplaced Pages is all twisted when you read about Alexander the Great he was Macedonian. Yes at that time there was Ancient Macedonia the Greek name did not exist in that time . Greece name was born in 1832 and now Greeks claim’s Macedonia to be Ancient Greece that’s absolutely 💯 not true ✌🏻🙏🏻 ] (]) 04:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
==Doric==
''kalan ameran'', everyone :) &mdash; for the purposes of the Macedon article, do we have any example word that shows Doric as well as (''Berenice''-style) XMK-characteristics? ''alixa, aliza'' "alder" (PIE *ol-, *el-) could be one? BTW, I am getting the impression that there were ''several'' languages in Ancient Macedonia, but we don't have enough data to resolve them. There would have been Doric Greek, I suppose, and there was also XMK, and maybe others (or, to put it differently, "XMK" didn't exist, there were several unknown languages). To put it like this would amount to original research, since I've only just thought of that. But probably someone somewhere would have published a similar idea? no? ] <small>]</small> 08:58, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I will stoop so low as to answer a greeting in ''provincial accent'': g'day, mate! :P Isn't "XMK" a ] model? In the meantime I found another authentic Macedonian text, a fragment from the diary of a Ptolemaic princess:

''The time: 1st Century BC''<br/>
''The place: the Royal Palace, Alexandria''

''Queen Veronica (in pain)'': "My stomag 'urts"<br/>
''Princess Cleopatra (smiling)'': "That phig you ate, like, phive minutes ago? It was, like, ''poisoned'', mother!"<br/>
''Queen Veronica (anguished)'': "But, Cleo, ''you'' gave me dat big"<br/>
''Princess Cleopatra (coldly)'': "It was poisoned, mother. '''''I''''' poisoned it!"<br/>
''Queen Veronica (gasping)'': "Cleo, how ''could'' you do dis?!? I-am-your-''moder''!"<br/>
''Princess Cleopatra (leering)'': "Yeah, but your name, like, '''''lacks aspiration''''', and I aspire to be, like, '''''QUEEN OF EGYPT'''''. And to, like, marry that hunk, your husband and my brother Ptolemy! Now, '''''DIE!'''''" <br/>

(walks away in triumph as the Queen falls to the floor, blue and twitching)<br/>
____________________________<br/>
*Big, phig = modern-day ] ] 10:34, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Follow-up:<br/>
::Upon her ascent on the throne, Cleopatra the (Nile) Valley girl duly assumed the title "Eumetor", and when she killed her brother and husband the Pharaoh to marry her (younger and yummier) nephew, she also assumed the title "Philadelphos" :)))))) ] 11:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:ok, 'graphos :o) I know I started the joking, but this was actually meant as a serious idea... ] <small>]</small> 13:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

::You see what happens when folks encourage me, I put on a show! Why, I could be a scriptwriter for ] :-PPP To business: can you direct me to a reputable ''online'' source of Macedonian word lists and names? I must confess I'm not impressed by the article Glossary, it looks haphazard to me. Primary sources would be '''''a-ok''''' - whacko webpages would not ] 15:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

==Quelle silence ...==
C'mon, Albanau, excite us with your erudite eloquence, your elaborate elegance, your ebullient effervescence! ] 10:38, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I'm busy at ] right now &mdash; WP is "emergency driven", I suppose :) ] <small>]</small> 11:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Oh, man, I see a '']'' coming with your name on it. Imagine the headlines: '''"The ] of Misplaced Pages flees for his life", "The ]s threaten ] with retaliation", "Something is rotten in ]'s ]"''', etc, etc. All this of course is '''''no excuse whatsoever''''' for Albanau the Enlightener to remain silent on crucial issues of our times. BTW did you hear that Skanderberg is recalling 250,000 trucks for faulty windscreen wipers? Apparently they cause poor visibility in heavy rain and have been responsible for 347 ] deaths so far. And it's all Albanau's fault too! ] 11:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::you are a funny man. Seriously, humour is sometimes all too scarce on Misplaced Pages. It's true, all you have to do is start vandalizing this article, and people will come jumping and give you attention. You may be blocked as a result, however :) ] <small>]</small> 11:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::: "humour is sometimes all too scarce on Misplaced Pages"? Now this is an ''unwarranted, inappropriate, ]ly'' attack on ] and '''''I won't allow it!''''' ] 11:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::::nah, this is actually in defence of Decius. Being used to grim panhellenic edit warriors with double axes, he couldn't ''know'' you were such a funnybone. ] <small>]</small> 14:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::::]?!?!? I go for ] ] 14:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Okay Chronographos, you are not a weasel. I ] for that. I get into worse arguments with my brother, and I can't be too mad at someone with a sense of humor. If the ] represents the ancient Macedonian language, I'm wondering why the Macedonians were so often viewed as non-Hellenes. ] 14:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Well, if you take off thinking that Alexander ''might'' have not identified himself as a Greek, but as a Macedonian instead, and then, after getting drunk, you conclude that he ''actually did'' the latter rather than the former, then I say that the old adage "in vino veritas" is strictly true about ], not ]. You state what is "often viewed". In ]'s case who was right? He or what most people "often viewed"? What most people often think or say does not define the truth by necessity. Well, maybe we should ask Alexander himself. Some quotes of his exist '''''verbatim''''', you know. Do you recall what inscription he ordered written when he sent 12 Persian shields to be hanged on the west architrave of the Parthenon as trophies? ] 14:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:I don't know, or if I read it before I don't remember. ] 14:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Let me refresh your memory then: "&#913;&#923;&#917;&#926;&#913;&#925;&#916;&#929;&#927;&#931; &#934;&#921;&#923;&#921;&#928;&#928;&#927;&#933; &#922;&#913;&#921; &#927;&#921; &#917;&#923;&#923;&#919;&#925;&#917;&#931; &#928;&#923;&#919;&#925; &#923;&#913;&#922;&#917;&#916;&#913;&#921;&#924;&#927;&#925;&#921;&#937;&#925; &#913;&#928;&#927; &#932;&#937;&#925; &#914;&#913;&#929;&#914;&#913;&#929;&#937;&#925; &#932;&#937;&#925; &#932;&#919;&#925; &#913;&#931;&#921;&#913;&#925; &#922;&#913;&#932;&#927;&#921;&#922;&#927;&#933;&#925;&#932;&#937;&#925;". What's your take of it? ] 14:55, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:I think it says something like Alexander son of Philip, a Hellene,... conquered Asia from the barbarous nations. ] 15:02, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::I give you an F for "fail". I was frankly hoping that, someone who states that Language A is a different one than Language B, should be able to read Language B (since there are no intact A texts). Here is the translation: "Alexander son of Philip and the Greeks, ''with the exception of the Spartans'', from the barbarians who inhabit Asia". The Spartan jab has to do with the fact that the Spartans refused to join the expedition because "every expedition in which Spartans participate should always be headed by a Spartan". The Spartans were living in the past, and Alexander was pointing that out most, er, pointedly. That piece of sarcasm apart, what does the inscription tell you on the matter of Alexander's own perception of himself and his troops? Something more than gin, one should hope ... ] 15:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Alexander the Great may well have identified as a Greek, since he got along more with his mother, who was a Greek, and there is also his father's Argive ancestry. ] 15:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:what evidence is there that Epirotes were Greeks? What Argive ancestry? That's a very vague claim. The Argeads were '''''way''''' more specific: they claimed to be descendants of ] himself. ''Maybe'' they were just aggrandizing themselves. Surely they didn't have the certificates matching their DNA to Hercules' DNA, did they? Is this the kind of "evidence" you prefer? In other words: your opinion is that Alexander's Parthenon inscription is unreliable because he had ulterior motives, whereas the Argeads' claim that they were descendants of .... Hercules (!) is sound and ''could not possibly have had an ulterior motive''. '''''Yeah right ...''''' ] 16:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:See above. Alexander dictates the inscription on behalf of the victors: himself (as king) and his troops (''the Greeks with the exception of the Spartans''). What now? Had he no Macedonians with him, that he should honor their part in the war? ] 15:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, maybe because the inscription was written in Athens, he didn't want to take pride away from the Greeks by underlining the Macedonian part, and maybe identifying Greeks with Macedonians was part of the policy of the Hellenization. Who knows. ] 15:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Maybe this, maybe that, maybe something else, ''maybe you've made your mind up and there ain't nobody gonna change it'' ] 16:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I can't read ancient Greek off the top, but if I would've checked Perseus I could've done it. I got lazy and just looked in my Scott & Liddel's book, and didn't find enough info. I can read it now, what really tripped me up was the use of 'plen' and I confused katoikounton with kat-oikeo, 'to be governed over', and I thought of 'govern over'> conquer. ] 15:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:LSJ - &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;-&#8051;&#969; ,

A. settle in, colonize, &#960;&#8057;&#955;&#953;&#957; Hdt.7.164 ; &#947;&#8134;&#957; E.Med.10 ; &#964;&#959;&#8150;&#962; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;&#949;&#8150;&#957; &#7952;&#952;&#8051;&#955;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#953; &#964;&#8048;&#957; &#960;&#8057;&#955;&#953;&#957; Decr.Byz. ap. D.18.91: generally, inhabit, &#964;&#8057;&#960;&#959;&#965;&#962; S.Ph.40 ; &#964;&#8052;&#957; &#7944;&#963;&#8055;&#945;&#957; SIG557.17 (Magn. Mae., iii B.C.), etc.:-- Pass., to be dwelt in or inhabited, opp. &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;&#8055;&#950;&#959;&#956;&#945;&#953; (to be just founded), Arist.Pol.1266b2.

2. abs., settle, dwell, &#950;&#951;&#964;&#959;&#8166;&#963;&#945; . . &#960;&#959;&#8166; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;&#959;&#8055;&#951;&#962; S.OC362 ; &#7989;&#957;&#945; &#967;&#961;&#8052; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;&#949;&#8150;&#957; Ar.Av.153 ; &#7952;&#957; &#948;&#8057;&#956;&#959;&#953;&#962;, &#7952;&#957; &#7940;&#963;&#964;&#949;&#963;&#953;, E.Hel. 1651, Pl.Lg.666e, etc.; &#945;&#8016;&#964;&#8057;&#952;&#953; Th.3.34 ; &#7952;&#957; &#956;&#959;&#957;&#945;&#961;&#967;&#8055;&#8115; Isoc.1.36 ; &#7952;&#960;&#8054; &#947;&#8134;&#962; Apoc.3.10 ; esp. of non-citizens, &#7960;&#966;&#8051;&#963;&#953;&#959;&#953; &#954;&#945;&#8054; &#959;&#7985; -&#959;&#8166;&#957;&#964;&#949;&#962; SIG352.4 (Ephesus, iv B.C.). cf. 633.67 (Milet., ii B.C.):--pf. and plpf. Pass., to have been planted or settled, &#954;&#945;&#964;&#8048; &#954;&#8061;&#956;&#945;&#962; Hdt.1.96 , cf.2.102; &#954;.&#957;&#8134;&#963;&#959;&#957;, &#964;&#8052;&#957; &#956;&#949;&#963;&#8057;&#947;&#949;&#953;&#945;&#957;, Id.4.8, Th.1.120.

II. administer, govern, &#959;&#7985; &#964;&#8048;&#962; &#960;&#8057;&#955;&#949;&#953;&#962; -&#959;&#8166;&#957;&#964;&#949;&#962; Phld.Rh.2.225 S.:--more freq. in Pass., &#954;&#945;&#964;&#8180;&#954;&#951;&#957;&#964;&#945;&#953; &#954;&#945;&#955;&#8182;&#962;, of Athens, S.OC1004; &#8000;&#961;&#952;&#8182;&#962; &#954;., of Sparta, Pl.Lg.683a.

III. intr. of cities, lie, be siluated, &#7952;&#957; &#964;&#959;&#8150;&#962; &#960;&#949;&#948;&#8055;&#959;&#953;&#962; ib.677c, cf. 682c: also c. acc. loci, &#964;&#8048;&#962; &#964;&#8052;&#957; &#7944;&#963;&#8055;&#945;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#954;&#959;&#8059;&#963;&#945;&#962; which are situated in . . , Isoc. 5.123.
] 16:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The fact that I'm a ] from the North :) who can't yet read ancient Greek without comprehensive dictionaries isn't relevant to the article or what it says. However, I am for the Greek dialect view being given more prominence, since enough scholars support it. Now, the Epirotes question: I can ask you the same thing about the Macedonians. ] 16:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
: My point exactly! There is similar dearth of existing ''hard'' evidence about the Epirotes and what they spoke. Yet you remain "unconvinced" about the Macedonians while accepting the Epirotes as Greeks. ''Maybe'' you just don't know enough about either of them, Decius .... ] 16:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm looking for a quote about Epirotes that I read last night that is relevant here. B back. ] 16:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

According to R. Malcolm Errington, in his ''A History of Macedonia'' (paraphrasing): "the fundamental Greek nationality of the Epirotes, Acarnanians, and Aetolians was never doubted", "unlike the Macedonians", whose Greekness was called into question. See chapter 1, pg. 4. I might quote it exactly later, but that's what he says. ] 16:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've been looking for more linguists who support the Macedonian-Greek dialect camp, but so far I have only collected more historians who believe that. R. Malcolm Errington himself in that 1986 book that I just mentioned views Macedonians as speakers of a Greek dialect. Errington was a Professor of Ancient History at the Philipps-Universität in Marsburg, West Germany (sic). ] 17:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:So, if I understand correctly what you wrote, Errington says that ''he himself'' thinks that Macedonians spoke a Greek dialect, whereas their Greekness has been ''questioned by others''? Is this the meaning of the Passive Voice ("never doubted", "called into question") Errington uses? Do I get it right? ] 17:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You got it right. Errington believes that Macedonian was a Greek dialect, but he discusses how their Greekness was called into question by the Greeks. He remarks how Macedonians, Epirotes, Acarnanians, and Aetolians all led the same "alien way of life" (verbatim): "'''This alien way of life was, however, common to the western Greeks in Epeiros, Acarnania, and Aitolia, as well as to the Macedonians, and their fundamental Greek nationality was never doubted.'''" In the context of the paragraph & the text, he is remarking how the Macedonians were singled out as non-Greeks for some reason, while those others weren't, according to Errington. ] 17:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

However, I've been reading Errington's book and he seems to be deceptive or selective, claiming for example in one place that the Greekness of the Macedonians was only questioned when the dispute with Athens developed, while ''in another place'' he discusses and admits how Herodotus recorded that the Macedonians were excluded from the Olympics until Alexander the I....so...Errington isn't the book I go by. ] 17:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The contradiction will be found as you turn from page 3 to 4, if somebody's curious, and I'll probably quote it later. I've noted that type of juggling of the facts before, which is why I trust linguists more than historians and classicists who are overflowing with pan-hellenism---not that that's bad, but it colors their interpretations. ] 17:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pg 3:'''This claim''' (Greek descent)'''was already made by Alexander I, who wished to participate as a runner in the Olympic Games, which apparently no Macedonian before him had done. But because participation was traditionally restricted to Greeks, Alexander had to prove his Greek ancestry, which he was able to do brilliantly with the tale of the Argive origins of his family.''' Errington doesn't proceed to question that Macedonians were excluded because Greeks viewed them as non-Hellenes. He seems to accept that fact, and he moves on. On page 4 however, he says this: '''Ancient allegations that the Macedonians were non-Greeks all had their origin in Athens at the time of the struggle with Philip II.'''---That's not only false, it is a contradiction. ] 18:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

So, that is why I am suspicious of the real motives and of the scholarly integrity of individuals like Errington, Hammond, monsieur Masson, and others of their ilk. ] 18:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Gosh, Decius, for a fellow who gets confused by "plen" (Greek kids learn ''plen'' at 1st Grade, when they are taught how to subtract: three oranges ''plen'' two oranges equals one orange), you're awful quick to be passing judgement on the Oxford Classical Dictionary, and the ''Grand Professorial Conspiracy'' which '''''you''''', ], so bravely exposed . Medical students who do this at Rounds get "pimped". Some ''have'' been driven to suicide after being repeatedly pimped. The rest learn rather quickly. Nevertheless all you do is quote, quote, quote, and then opine, opine, opine on the quotations, quotations, quotations. Yet your scientific training in the relevant field appears to be zero. My insistence, rather, is quite ''simple'': focus on the ''evidence''. Evaluate what's there. Coins, inscriptions, even poor old Hesychius writing ten centuries after the "crime". Hesychius, Hesychius, wheretofore art thou, Hesychius? ] 19:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) (PS I don't know the specifics of your self-described alcohol-related issues, but please read ]. Just trying to help)

You seem to have gotten frustrated. I wonder why. More evidence indeed is needed here, so feel free to bring it. In the meanwhile, I pride myself on not being able to translate that ancient Greek sentence off the top of my head, because I identify myself as a ] (Greek descent doesn't contradict that identification). The Romans are the ones who laid down the greatest empire this world has ever seen. ] 19:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:A ''''']'''''! Carry on, dear, carry on. <br/>
::For the rest of our readers, from the ] WP entry (''my comments in italics''): '''The behavior patterns of dry drunks are characterized by rigidity of thinking and going to extremes ('''''weasel'', ''prick''''') of characterization of people ('''''monsieur Masson, and others of their ilk''''') and situations as e.g. ('''''linguists''''') good and ('''''historians''''') evil. Subtle distinctions ('''''evidence''''') are difficult for the dry drunk to understand.''' <br/>
:::Now back to Decius: I should sincerely hope the above do not apply to you, but your Roman self-identification ''really'' puzzles me. For example, how do you realize this identification of yours in practical, every-day terms? Do you dress in togas? Is this strictly in the privacy of your own home? Do you keep ] at your home? Do you often perform certain ceremonies in relation to the ]? I just find this ''fascinating'' and I'd '''''love''''' to hear more .... ] 19:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm actually looking for a good Roman toga. If you find a website selling one, let me know. Honestly. ] 19:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:A toga ''prætexta'', or will a plain one do? I do believe you honestly mean every word you say. This is why your disinclination to discuss your "I am a Roman" statement leaves me perplexed. ''Surely'' this is something you feel intensely proud about, something to share with others. I, for example, also "respect the Romans" because they indeed "are the ones who laid down the greatest empire this world has ever seen". But, since I do not reside ], I cannot call myself a Roman (this being the year ]). Why do you? ] 20:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You guys must be stupid or something. You don't realize how I'm sitting back here laughing at all this. I'm here listening to ] on my stereo and looking through ''The Gun Digest Book of Assault Weapons'', and googling for a toga just to see if any are for sale. You got something to add to the article, do it. I don't own Misplaced Pages or even care about it beyond the articles I watch. ] 20:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Masta Killa! How exquisite! A certain Roman ] would be proud of you. Let not my ] annoy you ] 20:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chronographos, I'm not vindictive and I'm not holding the article in my tyrant-grip. I'm not some rigid jerk who thinks his say is law. No one is stopping you from editing the article, but like everybody else, your edits will be open to the fluidity of Misplaced Pages. ] 20:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:My aim is not to edit articles according to my own beliefs. Indeed "beliefs" and Misplaced Pages ''sont deux mots qui vont tres mal ensemble''. What I wish is to discuss the issues intelligently. To learn, perchance to teach. Which is why I have not touched the article since the ]. I enjoy convincing others and being convinced. ''Se vuol' ballare, Signior Contino ...'' ] 21:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) ()

:I'm glad you are buddying up now, slowly :) Anyway, 'graphos, considering that we are strictly only allowed to adduce published opinions, and arrange them in a pleasantly flowing writeup, it doesn't really matter if Decius is able to read Ancient Greek. I have no knowledge of most languages I read publications about. People could boo me off ], because I don't speak a single word of that :) ] <small>]</small> 09:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


''Hmm, maybe because the inscription was written in Athens, he didn't want to take pride away from the Greeks by underlining the Macedonian part, and maybe identifying Greeks with Macedonians was part of the policy of the Hellenization. Who knows.''

There is a passage in the Histories of Kallisthenes (1.37.9) where he quotes a letter of Alexander III:

`Now you fear punishment and beg for your lives, so I will let you free, if not for any other reason so that you can see the difference between a Greek king and a barbarian tyrant, so do not expect to suffer any harm from me. A king does not kill messengers.'

I wonder what sort of 'maybes' you'll fabricate for this one Decius... The fact is that in '''all''' records that we have from Macedonian royalties and scholars, the Macedonian people naturally identify themselves as Greeks in every single account. There's not a single piece of evidence which can remotely imply that Macedonian people had a separate ethnic conciousness (that many people go on about). The fact that Alexander's close relations with his army was a major factor to his military success, proves that his own views reflected the ones of the entire Macedonian nation. Unless of course you suggest that Alexander was a Greek dictator over a non-Greek people, because the quotation on "from Alexander and the '''Greeks'''", refers to his Macedonian armies. Anyway, I don't support the view that the Greekness of the Macedonians was ever literally doubted. Your question regarding why some people like Demosthenes did call Macedonians barbarians (while nobody ever wasted his time on Aetolians and Epirotes) can be easily answered by considering the military power of Macedon under Philip II. ] 14:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


''In the meanwhile, I pride myself on not being able to translate that ancient Greek sentence off the top of my head, because I identify myself as a ]. The Romans are the ones who laid down the greatest empire this world has ever seen. I respect the Romans.''

That's rather contradictory. It hasn't been two days since I randomly found myself in the basement of Gilbert Jeune by St-Michel, going through a book that was called "Façons de parler grec à Rome". The editor's presentation reads: "César selon Suétone serait mort dans les deux langues, s'adressant en latin à ses ennemis politiques, en grec à son fils". There was no Roman citizen who couldn't speak Greek. Of course the question that comes up is "what was ever a Roman" other than a title of power? The people who were originally "ethnic Romans" were assimilated into their own Empire. I suppose the Roman Empire was so great that got all Romans extinct... I think I'll stick with the empire of Alexander III. Besides, no Alexander, no Roman Empire. ] 14:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

'''Chronographe''' den exo '''graphtei''' akoma ekei pou synphonisame, dose mou ligo '''chrono''' mexri na epanelthei to diadyktio sto spiti mou. Milao kata auton ton tropo gia na min mas katalaboune. ] 14:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

==TLG==
::::As I have said before, I have no problem with the article as it stands now, nor do I wish it changed at this point. The conversation so far has satisfied me that Decius' grasp of the subject is superficial and patchy, at best. What I have asked for repeatedly, is to be directed to online primary sources of the original material used in the Glossary. You guys have ''not'' been forthcoming. Why is this? If there is no online stuff, let me know so that I can start raiding the bookshops. BTW, since I am a 'Graf', shouldn't you address me as ''Durchlaut''? :-P ] 11:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::it should be simple tracing all those words using the ] database. However, it would take me a couple of hours. Pay me, and I'll do it :) ] <small>]</small> 11:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::''Macedonian'' words in the Thesaurus Linguae ''Graecae''?!? Conspiracy, conspiracy! Nevertheless I had obtained (I won't say how) "TLG CD-E+ PHI5&7+ Musaios + TLG Workstation", an archive about 800 MB big after unzipping. I am confused as to this: is CD-E sufficient or do I need A, B, C and D as well, so to speak? ] 12:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::um, one CD should be sufficient. You will only find the words attested by Greek authors, of course, i.e. things like Theophrastus' maple, and of course Hesychius. Epigraphical stuff like coins will not be on there. ] <small>]</small> 12:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::::That's ok, I have ways and means and connections, you know. I may get access to the work of Stefanos Koumanoudis the Younger, a leading epigraphologist, and the grandson of , another legend who worked with, among others, ''Doerpfeld'', and a member of the Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. When the younger SK went to Paris for his advanced studies, his ''professeur'' asked each student to rise and introduce themselves. When SK started "Je m' appelle Stéphane Koumanoudis ...", the professor waved him down: "Je vous connai, Monsieur". Such was the renown of his grandfather! ] 13:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::::why then do we not have a ] article? Get busy man! &mdash; We don't have ], for that matter. But note ]. ] <small>]</small> 13:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::::Two articles, you mean. All in good time. I am now trying to locate the new poem by ] that was reconstructed from the ] findings, as published in yesterday. Then I need to work on my presentation to a :-PPP etc etc. ] 13:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) (And did I mention ) :-)))
Thracian words are found in Perseus' Greek database (cf. Brynchos), so it doesn't imply their views on the language classification. ] 13:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:he was joking! the names of Indian tribes, and words like ''aananaananalaaa'', ''aioiaoiiiaaao'', ''arithosaaaaa'' are found in the TLG. ] <small>]</small> 13:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I had to clear up the issue regardless if he was joking. Remember, Miskin also reads this page, and he might include that fact in his "arsenal". ] 13:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Decius, I was ''not'' joking when I referred you to the ] page ] 13:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well thanks Doc, but I'm not drunk. And take precautions so that your love of Greek wine doesn't turn you into a soaking wet drunk. ] 13:46, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Did I say you were? Surely your English comprehension is better than that! Worry not. I respect heritage, ], ], everyone's ] 14:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Vlad the Impaler. He who had Turks for lunch. I love that guy. ] 14:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:You should really let your ] flourish. You know, a ]'s armor, an ], Vlad's picturesque headdress and it's ''look out, ], here comes the ''']''''' ] 14:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::I am glad you can shake hands over your shared enmity against the Turks :) I'm afraid I cannot claim any ancestors involved in stemming the Turkish tide, but my girlfriend's finally stopped them, just outside Vienna, so mine didn't get a chance. But at the time we are looking at here, for better or worse, they are still safely tucked up behind the ]. ] <small>]</small> 14:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::Hey, ''I like'' Turks and I think they ] 14:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)



''Hmm, maybe because the inscription was written in Athens, he didn't want to take pride away from the Greeks by underlining the Macedonian part, and maybe identifying Greeks with Macedonians was part of the policy of the Hellenization. Who knows.''

There is a passage in the Histories of Kallisthenes (1.37.9) where he quotes a letter of Alexander III:

`Now you fear punishment and beg for your lives, so I will let you free, if not for any other reason so that you can see the difference between a Greek king and a barbarian tyrant, so do not expect to suffer any harm from me. A king does not kill messengers.'

I wonder what sort of 'maybes' you'll fabricate for this one Decius... The fact is that in '''all''' records that we have from Macedonian royalties and scholars, the Macedonian people naturally identify themselves as Greeks in every single account. There's not a single piece of evidence which can remotely imply that Macedonian people had a separate ethnic conciousness (that many people go on about). The fact that Alexander's close relations with his army was a major factor to his military success, proves that his own views reflected the ones of the entire Macedonian nation. Unless of course you suggest that Alexander was a Greek dictator over a non-Greek people, because the quotation on "from Alexander and the '''Greeks'''", refers to his Macedonian armies. Anyway, I don't support the view that the Greekness of the Macedonians was ever literally doubted. Your question regarding why some people like Demosthenes did call Macedonians barbarians (while nobody ever wasted his time on Aetolians and Epirotes) can be easily answered by considering the military power of Macedon under Philip II. ] 14:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


''In the meanwhile, I pride myself on not being able to translate that ancient Greek sentence off the top of my head, because I identify myself as a ]. The Romans are the ones who laid down the greatest empire this world has ever seen. I respect the Romans.''

That's rather contradictory. It hasn't been two days since I randomly found myself in the basement of Gilbert Jeune by St-Michel, going through a book that was called "Façons de parler grec à Rome". The editor's presentation reads: "César selon Suétone serait mort dans les deux langues, s'adressant en latin à ses ennemis politiques, en grec à son fils". There was no Roman citizen who couldn't speak Greek. Of course the question that comes up is "what was ever a Roman" other than a title of power? The people who were originally "ethnic Romans" were assimilated into their own Empire. I suppose the Roman Empire was so great that got all Romans extinct... I think I'll stick with the empire of Alexander III. Besides, no Alexander, no Roman Empire. ] 14:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

'''Chronographe''' den exo '''graphtei''' akoma ekei pou synphonisame, dose mou ligo '''chrono''' mexri na epanelthei to diadyktio sto spiti mou. Milao kata auton ton tropo gia na min mas katalaboune. ] 14:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree with you on some points. For instance, Greeks can call themselves Romans (if they want to) as much as any Italian can. It does not have to do with Rome, but with the empire. ] 14:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
: '''Graecia capta ferum captorem cepit, et artis intulit agresti Latio''' ''], Epistulae, 2.1.156'' ] 14:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yeah well, for obvious reasons by "Roman Empire" and "Romans" I wasn't referring to the ] hellenism. The Byzantine Empire was in fact the only original successor state to the real Roman Empire (TM), but the title "Rhomaioi" was only a symbolic (most foreigners indentified them as Greeks). The Greeks who indentified (or identify) themselves as 'Romans' never claimed an ethnic connection to ancient Rome. And I don't think that any educated Italian would ever consider the Roman civilization as a sole heritage of the Italian nation. Modern Italy is connected to the ] as much as any other ]-Speaking peninsula did prior to the ] and the creation of modern ]. Besides there's no such thing as ancient Italians or ancient French. And of course French != Francs like Turkish != Turks. ] 15:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:and ''Akhaioi''!= ''Elliniki'', one is tempted to add. ] <small>]</small> 15:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:: ] to you too! :P ] 15:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Not until the 9th century BC dab. ] 15:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

== Pella katadesmos ==

The ] is pretty compelling proof of ancient Macedonian being a form of Greek. Good job, guys. As for whether the others considered the Macedonians barbarians, well... My mother is a vociferous ] from ] who considers the Maniots the only true Greeks as "no Turk ever set foot in the ]". Even the non-Maniot ] (like my father) are suspect, and she has absolutely no time for the ]: "They're like the Yugoslavs, they eat too many peppers."--] 17:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I hope this nice amateur ethnologist lady is as good at her area of expertise (=dishwashing) ] 17:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Masson knew about the ] (he writes of it), but even he said we should wait for further discoveries to be more sure. ] 17:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What Masson and others realize is that a Dorian Greek dialect may have been spoken in Macedonia alongside Macedonian. That is not unlikely. ] 17:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:How sure can you be that ] was not spoken as well, Decius? ] 17:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Wow. The Macos spoke Doric ''and'' Attic in addition to their own tongue. Such talent. No wonder they gobbled up ] so readily.--] 18:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:No, I didn't imply bilingualism necessarily, I meant geographical co-incidence. ] 18:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay, then the alternative is: the ancient Greeks "proper" were such astounding xenophobes and chauvinists, they considered Macedonians as non-Hellenes because they spoke an archaic Doric Greek dialect? Not a much better scenario. ] 17:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Venom becomes Decius (yawnnnnn, what else is new ...) ] 17:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) (PS If you ever get overtly ]d, Decius, it might not be just ] ]. Methinks you were born with ] in your ]s, instead of ])
:That is probably closer to the mark than anything you've ever written, Decie. The Greeks have been at each other's throats as a national pastime since antiquity, and the biggest insult in the book is to question someone's Greekness.--] 18:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In either case, I was right: Ancient Macedonian was a separate language from Greek (a language is a dialect with an army, etc.). ] 18:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:No, it's your ] brain that cannot grasp complex realities ] 18:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I got something for you to grasp. ] 18:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:For the time being, grasp a ]. It won't be the first time ... and there's nothing wrong with "comfort foods" ''per se'' ] 18:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No. Doric is undisputedly Greek. XMK is not. I agree it's a compelling that XMK was marginal even in the 4th century, and maybe was never more than a mountain dialect. I.e. it may be argued that ''Ancient Macedonian'' is a '''misnomer''', since typical Macedonians spoke Doric. Maybe. But that does not in the least suggest that XMK = Doric. Where is the Doric vocalism in XMK? Where is the XMK voicing in Doric? Also, it would be more compelling if the katadesmos was 5th century. ''Everybody'' agrees Greek became dominant from the 4th century. An interesting text. Not decisive to this question. ] <small>]</small> 18:07, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:''Attic'' Greek became dominant from the 4th century, yes, but the language of the katadesmos is certainly not Attic. It looks like Doric, but it isn't. It is precisely these differences from Doric that suggest it is in fact Macedonian. But still unmistakably Greek.--] 18:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I was joking. My comment was aimed at Theathenae and the Tosk/Arvanite debacle. ] 18:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:], the débâcle you speak of concerns ] ] ]'s ] that a "pure Arvanítis is a pure Albanian" and his ] pearl of wisdom, namely that "the Tosk and the Gheg" are "mostly mutually intelligible", despite all evidence to the contrary. See ]--] 18:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I wasn't implying who has the upper hand in the debacle, I think both you and Albanau are stretching the thing in opposite extreme directions. But I'm not getting involved further. ] 18:48, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Would you two please keep off-topic disussions where they belong? Thank you ever so kindly ] 18:53, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The words identifed as belonging to XMK exhibit a consistent sound-change pattern (extremely unlikely to be a false positive---the sound-changes are actual), as already noted, both in the article text and previously on this talk page. The katadesmos from Pella doesn't show these changes. Did the changes happen after the katadesmos? I doubt that, but let's wait for further discoveries, as Masson said. ] 18:58, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


''Okay, then the alternative is: the ancient Greeks "proper" were such astounding xenophobes and chauvinists, they considered Macedonians as non-Hellenes because they spoke an archaic Doric Greek dialect? Not a much better scenario.''

Oh please, you sound as if you're quoting from Makedonija.com. How the hell has this false idea got stuck in your head? If Greeks didn't consider them Greek, then why did they let them in the '''Hellenic leagues'''? Even Demosthenes states that Macedonia had a place in the pan-hellenic events prior to Philip II. And as for the Olympic Games, I told you already that we have lists of Olympic winners from Macedon since the 5th c. BC. ] 29 June 2005 04:18 (UTC)

''Also, it would be more compelling if the katadesmos was 5th century. ''Everybody'' agrees Greek became dominant from the 4th century.''

Actually it was ] that became dominant from the 4th century in not only Macedonia, but also in the entire Greek and Hellenistic World. Ironically ] was practically "invented" by the the Macedonians. Attic was only spoken in the Royal court and was most likely never adopted by the Macedonian people and yet it was undoubtly understood (which enforces the theory of XMK belonging to ]). There is no basis on ] being an imported language. The Pella Katadesmos is an unidentified idiom of Doric (different than ]), ] etc), which assures that it was a native speech of Macedon. Unfortunately for some, all evidence keeps leading to the conclusions of Masson. ] 29 June 2005 04:18 (UTC)


''The words identifed as belonging to XMK exhibit a consistent sound-change pattern (extremely unlikely to be a false positive---the sound-changes are actual), as already noted, both in the article text and previously on this talk page. The katadesmos from Pella doesn't show these changes.''

Sigh, maybe that's because such "sound-change patterns" could not be reflected in Classical ] where the alphabet consisted of raw capital letters. The creation of minuscule letters and accents was introducted in ]. ]

I thought about an unlikely explanation myself: the katadesmos writer may have decided to not indicate the sounds properly in the text, representing them rather by standard sounds (ph, th, etc.), the reason being to make Macedonian look like more standard Greek in writing. But I don't believe that. The evidence is conflicting, and the solution I see is that in ancient Macedon, speakers of Doric (Pella katadesmos) lived beside speakers of XMK (Berenike, danos, kombous, kebala, etc.). ] 29 June 2005 04:45 (UTC)

== Glossary ==

''Agkalis'' is probably a mis-rendering of ''Ankalis'' (PIE *ank, 'to bend'). ''Agkalis'' is from Babaev's glossary, apparently. Cf. Attic ''ankulos'', ''ankos'', ''ankistron'', etc., from PIE *ank (or *ang). Cf. also Latin ''angulus'' (angle, bend), Old English ''ancleow'' (ankle), Sanskrit ''anka'' (hook). ] 19:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Decius, your utter ignorance, combined with your alcoholic stubborness, make a uniquely repulsive amalgam of &#948;&#959;&#954;&#951;&#963;&#953;&#963;&#959;&#966;&#943;&#945;. NONE of the words you mention do you even spell correctly. I will not correct you because I would like you to keep demonstrating your incompetence. ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Really? The transliterations are as according to the American Heritage Dictionary, so send them a letter of complaint. If you want all the accents indicated, don't expect them from me unless I really need to indicate them. ] 02:12, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Written ], ], ], but should be read as ank-. ] 19:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:that's no problem at all. We're just transliterating, here, and alpha-gamma-kappa would of course be read as ''ank-''. ] <small>]</small> 19:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::In one word, no. You are wrong too, Dab ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Excuse me for "opining" again, but I will say that Macedonian and Attic were not very mutually intelligible, and I don't think the Pella katadesmos is Macedonian. There is an Egyptian papyrus that apparently records how a Greek general had to send a soldier who spoke Macedonian to address a Macedonian cavalry. Will find the papyrus in question. ] 20:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Please do. And try to stay sober while at it ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
After all is said and done, I'm confident that ancient Macedonian would qualify as a language: there would be enough differences to support that. A language belonging to a Greco-Macedonian group, as I said before (and as linguist Brian Joseph said, "most likely not a Greek dialect on a par with Doric, Attic, etc."). ] 20:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Theathenae, be careful: Attic ''amalos'' is an alpha euphonicum added to the stem ''mal'', meaning 'soft', from PIE *mel, 'soft', while the Macedonian word is claimed by some to be from PIE *amma, from which comes Latin ''amare'' (to love). ] 21:00, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Why? ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Also, until a reference is provided, I will remove ''kompos''. The Attic cognate in fact is ''gomphios'' (=molar tooth). ] 21:06, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:So, you are totaly unaware of "&#947;&#972;&#956;&#966;&#959;&#962;", of which "&#947;&#959;&#956;&#966;&#943;&#959;&#962;" is the diminutive. I am '''''not''''' surprised. What surprises me a little bit is that you continue to preach nonsense on stuff you know nothing about. Times change, Decius. Your unscientific mumbo-jumbo will not go unchallenged any more. ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Huh? You must be the drunk guy today. ''Gomphos'' is listed right above gomphios in my book, and I've even mentioned the word ''gomphos'' on this very Talk Page before: see ], section #7 near the top called "Greek cognates". And when I transliterate, I do not indicate accents (á,í,etc.), just to make people like you upset. ] 02:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Actually, if Macedonian ''amale'' is also a euphonic alpha added to ''mal'', then it can be a cognate. But the references I've seen so far (not many, admittedly, on this particular etymology) say it's not from PIE *mel. Maybe dab can weigh in on this also: what does Pokorny say? ] 21:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In my LS, there is ''argilla'' (or ''argila'') listed as meaning, 'an underground chamber', occuring in a text (Ephorus ap. Strabo). Don't think it's Attic. Might even be a Macedonian word listed. ] 21:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:A few other Macedonian words are explicitly tagged as such, like &#954;&#961;&#940;&#946;&#946;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#962; and &#963;&#940;&#961;&#953;&#963;&#963;&#945;. {{Polytonic|&#7940;&#961;&#947;&#953;&#955;&#955;&#959;&#962;}} means 'white clay', 'potter's earth'.--] 21:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::So, what does "&#940;&#961;&#947;&#953;&#955;&#959;&#962;" mean? (rhetorical question) ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't want to seem like "Mister-know-it-all" (because I do not know it all), but the only one that surprised me was Attic ''argos'' (idle), contracted from ''a-ergos'' (>alpha privativum + ''ergos'' 'work'). I knew about that word, but I didn't make the connection to Macedonian ''arkon''. But I suppose it's a cognate. I knew about Attic ''amalos'', but I admit I forgot to connect that to the Macedonian word. I think the given etymology for that Macedonian word (from PIE *am) caused me to overlook that. ] 22:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::By now, you definitely look like "Mister-know-nothing" ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:In that case, you would be something like "Mister-know-less-than-Mister-know-nothing", judging by your fantastic exposé of ''klinotrokhon''. ] 02:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Indeed. ''Arkon'' could well have been the name by which we knew ] had Macedonian won out over Attic for supremacy among the Greek dialects. What was your source for that ''amal&#275;'' etymology?--] 22:12, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The suggestion that the Macedonian word is from PIE *am I took (actually dab took it, but I also assume responsibility) from Babaev, but note that Babaev merely echoed someone else. The etymology for Attic ''amalos'' (a+ PIE *mel) is from Liddel-Scott's. They are contradictory, and I don't know who is right. ] 22:16, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Well, when you have two identical words that mean exactly the same thing, why make your life more difficult than it need be?--] 22:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::What are Babaev's academic credentials? (this is the second time I pose the question, I hope it will not go unanswered again) ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree they are most likely cognates. I really can't wait till more linguistic references are available on the internet concerning the ancient Macedonian material. I'm tired of this "dark ages" we are in. ] 22:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Judging from that glossary, XMK looks like an archaic form of Greek with a few loanwords from neighbouring Thraco-Illyrian languages. Either that or it preserved more IE vocabulary than the southern Greek dialects, which had heavy pre-Hellenic (non-IE) substratal influences. Macedonian will probably be proven beyond any reasonable doubt to be archaic Greek within our lifetimes, just like ] was.--] 22:44, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Actually Ventris was totally convinced that Linear B would read Etruscan. So Decius' alcohol-fumed improvisations may actually prove a total jinx to his poorly disguised agenda ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm satisfied to view Macedonian as a semi-Greek language. That glossary to me shows enough differences to justify the term ]. ] 22:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Did you celebrate your satisfaction ]? (not that you need ''special'' reasons to drink) ] 01:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I doubt anyone would question the Greekness of Macedonian were it not for the politics of the matter, both ancient and modern.--] 22:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:One reason why I never incorporated the Babaev glossary is because I wanted to verify more of his info. I was satisfied to leave it as an external link. But it's bettter that dab incorporated it, because now we can hammer it out and improve it, and ultimately we've discarded the Babaev glossary and created a new one. We still have to verify more etymologies and cognates and sources. ] 00:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chronographos, you came in here making various accusations and insults, none of which stick. Those transliterations may not be the best, but they are used in my ], first edition. So even if they are wrong as you claim, it's not my problem. ] 02:52, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've checked, and they are also used by : so are you being overly-pedantic, or just being a jerk? ] 03:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

As for Cyril Babaev, he is not a good source of info at all, and it is unfortunate that his glossary was the only Macedonian glossary on the web: . Email him and tell him how you feel directly: cyril@babaev.com. Babaev is no "ally" of mine, and I would have preferred not dealing with his website at all. ] 04:04, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Generally though, the stuff he claims is substantiated by other references (Pokorny, etc.), but everything on Babaev's site has to be double-checked. ] 04:23, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:So, where did you suddenly disappear to, Doc? It's amusing how you hurl out insults like "incompetent" when you have revealed ''your'' incompetence earlier by such exquisite examples as your ''klinotrokhon'' exposé and your irregular-aspiration-is-proved-by-Philotelas argument... ] 04:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::I stand by my appraisal of Theophrastus' hearsay botanics. And I never ever wrote anything about any "Philotelas". You are imagining things, Decius. As usual. ] 10:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:You're probably going to make up some lie after the fact and say that you suddenly left after making your latest edits, etc.,---but the fact is, my responses came down right in front of your face, and you couldn't respond. ] 08:30, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

::Decius, your continual alcoholic stupor has probably deprived you of all sense of time, place and especially judgement. I came home ''very late'' last night from my Med School class reunion, sat down at the PC for half an hour, took care of the downloads, email etc that had transpired during my absence, answered all pertinent points in this discussion, and went straight to bed ''as the sun was about to rise''. So, according to you, I should have stayed online, sleepless on a Sunday morning, and waited for your esteemed person to respond to me. '''''The fact that I did not, and went to sleep at 5 AM, proves that I am wrong and a liar to boot???''''' You are ''severely unbalanced'', Decius, and that's all there is to it. To sum things up: I will be on Misplaced Pages on MY spare time, as fits MY schedule, I will respond WHENEVER I please, and THERE AIN'T NOTHIN' YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT EITHER. On to the substantive points:
:::The links on Babaev's site '''don't work''' as of 12:42 Greek time, Sunday, June 26th 2005. As of 7 or 8 hours ago, the Lidell-Scott search facility at Perseus found '''no''' entries under ''ankulos'', ''ankos'', ''ankistron'', '''because there aren't any'''. The words proper are ''&#940;&#947;&#954;&#953;&#963;&#964;&#961;&#959;&#957;'' etc. Indeed I doubt that ''any'' Greek word exists with the complex -nk- in it. So you can take the ''American Heritage Dictionary'' and shove it where it best pleases you. As ] pointed out to you, &#957; turns to &#947; before &#954;. ''Always''. Therefore there is '''''no''''' Attic word ''ankalis'': the word is ''agkalis'' and it means "bent arm" and by extension whatever can be held in bent arms. Hence the modern Greek usage: ''agkale/agkalia'', a hug or an armful. Which is exactly how manual laborers harvest wheat: they hug as many wheatstalks as they can, and then cut them with the sickle. So don't you "email AHD" me. When Perseus comes back online at 7:00 Eastern Time, you can check for yourself. Otherwise I'll be happy to scan and post the relevant page(s) from my Liddell-Scott (Greek 4-volume Edition, 1948). Now it ''is'' conceivable that you think AHD a higher authority on Classics that Liddell-Scott. Which ties perfectly with your stated preference to urinating out of windows over the study of Greek.
::::I asked you '''''why''''' are the two ''amalos'' words ''considered'' to stem from two different roots and you failed to explain. It seems that, whenever something does not suit your outlandish, unscientific theories, a mysterious Passive Voice comes out of the blue and vindicates them. Not to mention that the "Attic"" cognate in your Glossary has an H (&#948;&#945;&#963;&#949;&#943;&#945;) which should not be there. Was this in AHD too? A dictionary that can't even spell? This is pathetic, Decius. Under different circumstances, I'd urge you to ''do better than that'', but it seems you are incapable of doing better. ] 10:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::::O ], to be fair, the traditional Roman transliteration of the -&#947;&#954;- cluster is -nk-, not -gk-, as that is how it was pronounced. Hence ] in English, rather than ''agkylosis''. Also, the ''hamal&#275;'' with the {{Polytonic|&#948;&#945;&#963;&#949;&#8150;&#945;}} was put there by yours truly as that's what L&S gives as the ''Attic'' form ('''{{Polytonic|&#7937;&#956;&#945;&#955;&#972;&#962;}}'''), immediately after the main entry '''{{Polytonic|&#7936;&#956;&#8112;&#955;&#972;&#962;}}''', which I presume is the general (non-Attic) Greek form.--] 11:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::::You are obviously right about "Roman transliteration", but this is not about how a Greek word is transliterated ''for use in the Latin language'': this is about how a Greek word is transliterated ''so that people without Greek fonts may visualize the Greek word''. And the proper pronunciation is "ang". If ''ank'' were pronounced ''ank'' in Greek, there would be no need for the ''k'' to uniformly turn into ''g'' before ''n''. Remember the cardinal rule of Ancient Greek "spelling": you don't read what is written, you write what you pronounce. There is a (Thessalian, I believe) inscription that reads "&#949;&#956; &#960;&#972;&#955;&#949;&#953;" (in the city). It is ''not'' a "spelling error". As for the ''amalos'' entry, I'm sorry but my 1948 LS print edition only lists it with a &#968;&#953;&#955;&#942;. Since Perseus is down for maintenance right now, I cannot check if an entry with &#948;&#945;&#963;&#949;&#943;&#945; currently exists as well.] 11:40, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::::::{{Polytonic|&#7960;&#957; &#964;&#940;&#958;&#949;&#953; &#960;&#945;&#964;&#961;&#943;&#948;&#945;}}, but I disagree with using the Latin alphabet to "visualise" Greek as all modern browsers are perfectly capable of displaying Greek and even polytonic characters. (There is a special Misplaced Pages ] template, which I am using here; check the formatting by opening an edit page.) As for '''{{Polytonic|&#7937;&#956;&#945;&#955;&#972;&#962;}}''', it is listed in my 1997 LS abridged edition, so its absence from your 1948 print edition is mysterious to say the least.--] 12:08, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::::::Fair enough. I write in Polytonic with pen and paper, but as Microsoft has made polytonic writing with a keyboard a twisted ''legerdemain'', I prefer monotonic. The issue here is AHD's transliterating, not mine or yours. If you don't like it anymore than I do, <Decius mode> SEND THEM AN EMAIL AND FRIGGIN' COMPLAIN ABOUT IT </Decius mode> :-PPP ] 12:30, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The ''nk'' vs. ''gk'' question is really a red herring. It matters for the alphabetical ordering, but that's about it. Indeed, I imported the list so it can be checked and improved. It was transliterated to begin with, but if you like to change it back to the Greek alphabet, that's fine with me. ] <small>]</small> 12:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Dab, can you please talk some sense into Decius? And can we please have some decent conversation here? Decius is really impossible to deal with: one moment he says that this young Russian diplomat is not trustworthy, and five minutes later he proclaims that, given a difference of opinion between LSJ and Babaev, the issue is unresolved. If the opinion of an "untrustworthy source" is given equal gravity to the opinion of the standard Greek Lexicon, there is ''no way'' arguments can be advanced to a satisfactory conclusion. ] 12:30, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:But would we do that just for the Attic, or for the Macedonian too? ] may not appreciate the ] being used for XMK, and bring out his ].--] 12:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Which brings up another ]. I do not want to insinuate ''anything'', but it will not be flattering to Misplaced Pages if someone had trouble with the law down the line. Clandestine arm dealers and possible Mafia connections is not exactly good PR ] 12:39, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::I don't get it. Of course XMK was written in the Greek alphabet ''as far as it was written at all'', what else? Linear B? Babaev is really not an issue. I mean, he hacked together an online glossary, that's great, and for some time that was the only XMK resource on the internet. Why would we bash him because it is not up to academic standards? Nobody ever claimed it was. That was just our ''starting point''. Now if everybody is really so confused by ], let's just move back to the Greek alphabet, for the glossary. This is likely to cause more confusion, of course, since the Greeks (who seem to pass through here in droves) will just think beta is and eta is etc, but at least we'll be just giving the attested forms. Using ''one-to-one'' transliteration of the Greek alphabet, a gamma is just rendered as ''g'', no matter if it corresponds to or not. ] <small>]</small> 12:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::also, transliteration is useful from keeping apart the language from the script. Note that I wrote the entire ] article without using a single arabic letter, and that's not because I don't know how to. It's just that as soon as you use anything non-ascii, American users will come to the talk pages complaining about the funny foreign squiqqles (I shit you not). ] <small>]</small> 13:01, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::::I agree on all counts. And I am glad you write sanely, concisely, argue one point at a time, do not apply double standards, and do not rant every ten minutes in the stream-of-consciousness Decius mode. But then again you don't drink all day long. ''Or do you?'' :-P ] 13:08, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Ladies and gentlemen, see my Perseus link, which is up once again now. Each of those three words are transliterated by Perseus exactly as I transliterated them: ''ankulos'', ''ankos'', ''ankistron'' (and ''agkalis'' is transliterated as ''ankalis'', and the Macedonian word is even mentioned in the Perseus text ). We are writing for English readers, and I never heard of "agkylosis" in English. ] 18:39, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::As I said, it's a matter of transliteration and phonology. We fully understand Greek phonology, and therefore we know that ''agk'' is rendered ''/ank/''. We can assume as much for XMK, of course, but with an unknown language, it is more safe to use a lossless transliteration. Greek transliteration of alpha-gamma-kappa is ''not'' lossless. it collapses with hypothetical alpha-nu-kappa. Only, we know that alpha-nu-kappa will not occur, or be equivalent to alpha-gamma-kappa. Can we say as much for XMK? If in doubt, trasliterate without loss of information. ] <small>]</small> 19:00, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::When I search LSJ online with the "ank" string, only the word ''anakrites'' (!) comes up. LSJ's transliteration (e.g. ankalis) is ''unacceptable'' unless either one of two conditions exist: (1) readers are alerted that &#947; before &#954; is always transliterated as ''n'', or (2) the Greek script is exhibited alongside in the printed edition. In any other case, your comments about "losslessness" apply fully. And I cannot accept that LSJ have been so sloppy. Therefore one of the two conditions must be actually present in print, possibly both. The fact that the online version does not meet them means that people ignorant of Greek (e.g. Decius) are handicapped. ] 21:47, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay, exceptions can always be made. ] 19:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Chronographos, your gloss on Macedonian ''ankalis'' is unlikely: more likely it did not refer to an armful of anything, but to the bent sickle (PIE *ank): it is a singular noun. In Attic, the singular noun referred to the (bent) arm. ] 19:59, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::I fully agree with LSJ's comments on ''agkalis''. I never said that it meant "an armful". I explained how the term evolved afterwards. Ignorant people, like you, should show express gratitude at such tutoring.
:::I noted with interest your failure to respond to my comments on ]. Furthermore, connections between ex-communist-country gangs operating in the West and Islamic terrorism are well established, as they provide a channel for the clandestine sale of weaponry. I ''sincerely hope'', for your sake and safety, that ] have been merely in ''jest'', and there is ] that would interest the ]. Or the ]. Or the ] for that matter. ]?

:Yeah, there might be. ] 22:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::You mean you are not sure, or just being evasive? I, for one, hope that your safety is not in jeopardy. Of course other people's safety ''does come'' first, and if you have done something illegal, then one can only wish that the law be enforced, however ruthlessly. ''Dura lex, sed lex''.

:I'm going to ask you this: do you agree to mutual civility between us from now on, or do you prefer mutual hostility? ] 22:56, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::This depends on whether you do have gang connections or other clandestine dealings. Olive branches often are veiled threats. Or overt ones.

:I'm not making any threats, but I can't discuss my personal life. Whatever I did or didn't do, it's most likely in my past. ] 23:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::You mean you have a '''criminal record'''?
:::Get a ], guys.--] 23:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:If you were a woman interested in a relationship, then I would have to answer, but we are just two guys on Misplaced Pages. ] 23:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Evasion, evasion, evasion. "Whatever I did or didn't do, it's most likely in my past". The art of saying nothing whilst appearing to be saying something. In other words: evasion.

:Maybe you just like having an "enemy", so you can vent yourself. I don't need to vent myself in Misplaced Pages, and I would as good be civil towards you: but if you insist. ] 23:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::This is not about anyone's needs, this is about the rule of law.

:Okay, then: '''no''', there is nothing that the law needs to concern itself with in my current or past situation. ] 23:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::This, if true, is much better.

:I'm trying to find information on the circumstances under which the ] was found. How it was dated, etc. ] 23:58, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

==transliteration etc.==
*ad&#275; "clear sky" (Attic &#945;&#7988;&#952;&#961;&#951; aíthr&#275;), adraia "bright weather" (Hes. Attic &#945;&#7984;&#952;&#961;&#943;&#945; aithría, PIE *aidh-)
something went wrong here. The point of mentioning "Hes." is that ''Hesychius'' said:
*ad&#275;: aithra
*adraia: aithrios
i.e. aithra is a ''translation'', by Hesychius, we are not claiming ad&#275; is identical to aithra (although it is probably related). We then translate Hesychius' ''translations'' into English, aithra as "clear sky" and aithria as "bright weather". If you fiddle with the glossary, please make sure you understand what's already there in the first place. ] <small>]</small> 19:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just so we all know, that was ]'s doing: 20:47 25 Jun. ] 19:24, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I know I know. It's not a disaster either. It's just not clear why the "Hes." is there anymore. ] <small>]</small> 19:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My apologies. I ripped '''{{Polytonic|&#945;&#7988;&#952;&#961;&#951;}}''' from LS which is listed as an ''earlier'' Attic form, but you're quite right, it would've been '''{{Polytonic|&#945;&#7988;&#952;&#961;&#945;}}''' by the time of Hesychius. I somehow figured that only the second word was his, as the ''Hes.'' tag was right at the end of the original entry. As for ''adraia'', are you certain it is the exact translation of the masculine '''{{Polytonic|&#945;&#7988;&#952;&#961;&#953;&#959;&#962;}}''', rather than the feminine '''{{Polytonic|&#945;&#7984;&#952;&#961;&#943;&#945;}}'''? The former is the adjective meaning ''clear'', ''bright'', ''fair'' or ''in the open air'', whereas the latter is the feminine noun which actually means ''fine weather'' or ''open sky''. May we see the original manuscript?--] 19:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:ok, even my original entry may have been wrong. I have to check Hesychius. All I know is that Pokorny links both words to ''aidh'' "to burn". ] <small>]</small> 20:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The joys of Google. For those of you who can read ] ], there's a guy who has traced ''sarissa'' back to '''{{Polytonic|&#963;&#945;&#943;&#961;&#969;}}''' 'to show the teeth' (esp. in scorn or malice) or 'to sweep clean/away' and ''abagna'' ('rose') back to '''{{Polytonic|&#7937;&#946;&#961;&#972;&#962;}}''' 'delicate, pretty, dainty, soft, luxurious'. I would add that the ''-agna'' in ''abagna'' reminds me of '''{{Polytonic|&#7937;&#947;&#957;&#972;&#962;}}''' 'pure, chaste, unsullied'. I guess a rose is all of those things.--]
20:30, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Doric ''abós'' meant 'young, luxuriant' and LS says it may be connected to ''abros'' (delicate, graceful, etc.). ] 20:53, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Well, this guy actually writes it '''&#945;&#946;&#972;&#962;''', but my Doric is rather sketchy so I opted for LS Attic. Damn ]. In that case, ''abagna'' is almost certainly derived from '''{{Polytonic|&#7936;&#946;&#972;&#962;}}''', possibly compounded with my suggestion '''{{Polytonic|&#7937;&#947;&#957;&#972;&#962;}}'''.--] 21:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

As long as we're listing equivalent forms: Macedonian ''kombous''<>Attic ''gomphious'' (masc. acc. pl.). ] 20:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


this guy seems to have a few sources that we are missing so far. Especially ''kebala'' is interesting (another example of the Berenike-law). He also seems to have a better text of the Pellas katadesmos (?). In Greece, even philologistts feel compelled to rant against the "apologetes of Panslavism"? What is panslavism, and what has it got to do with XMK I wonder? ] <small>]</small> 20:54, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:He's not in Greece, he's in Melbourne, Australia. And even philologists can get emotional sometimes. :)--] 21:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:&#917;&#943;&#957;&#945;&#953; &#946;&#941;&#946;&#945;&#953;&#945; &#945;&#955;&#942;&#952;&#949;&#953;&#945; &#972;&#964;&#953; &#945;&#960;&#972; &#964;&#951;&#957; &#945;&#961;&#967;&#945;&#943;&#945; &#956;&#945;&#954;&#949;&#948;&#959;&#957;&#953;&#954;&#942; &#948;&#953;&#940;&#955;&#949;&#954;&#964;&#959; &#948;&#953;&#945;&#963;&#974;&#952;&#951;&#954;&#949; &#949;&#955;&#940;&#967;&#953;&#963;&#964;&#959;&#962; &#956;&#972;&#957;&#959; &#945;&#961;&#953;&#952;&#956;&#972;&#962; &#955;&#941;&#958;&#949;&#969;&#957;, &#960;&#949;&#961;&#943; &#964;&#953;&#962; 350, &#945;&#960;&#972; &#964;&#953;&#962; &#959;&#960;&#959;&#943;&#949;&#962; &#959;&#953; 200 &#949;&#943;&#957;&#945;&#953; &#945;&#957;&#952;&#961;&#969;&#960;&#969;&#957;&#973;&#956;&#953;&#945;, &#972;&#960;&#969;&#962; &#913;&#956;&#973;&#957;&#964;&#945;&#962;, &#913;&#955;&#954;&#941;&#964;&#945;&#962;, &#913;&#961;&#967;&#941;&#955;&#945;&#959;&#962;, &#934;&#953;&#955;&#974;&#964;&#945;&#962;, &#923;&#940;&#947;&#959;&#962;, &#917;&#973;&#948;&#945;&#956;&#959;&#962;, &#924;&#945;&#967;&#940;&#964;&#945;&#962;, &#914;&#949;&#961;&#949;&#957;&#943;&#954;&#951;, &#920;&#949;&#963;&#963;&#945;&#955;&#959;&#957;&#943;&#954;&#951; (&#972;&#955;&#945; &#949;&#955;&#955;&#951;&#957;&#953;&#954;&#940;), &#954;&#945;&#953; &#959;&#953; &#965;&#960;&#972;&#955;&#959;&#953;&#960;&#949;&#962; &#954;&#959;&#953;&#957;&#940; &#959;&#957;&#972;&#956;&#945;&#964;&#945;, &#972;&#960;&#969;&#962; &#945;&#954;&#961;&#959;&#965;&#957;&#959;&#943;, &#954;&#940;&#961;&#945;&#946;&#959;&#962;, &#954;&#949;&#946;&#945;&#955;&#940;, &#960;&#949;&#950;&#941;&#964;&#945;&#953;&#961;&#959;&#962;, &#957;&#953;&#954;&#940;&#964;&#969;&#961;, &#945;&#946;&#961;&#959;&#973;&#964;&#949;&#962;, &#940;&#946;&#945;&#947;&#957;&#945; (&#963;&#964;&#951; &#963;&#965;&#957;&#964;&#961;&#953;&#960;&#964;&#953;&#954;&#942; &#964;&#959;&#965;&#962; &#960;&#955;&#949;&#953;&#959;&#968;&#951;&#966;&#943;&#945; &#949;&#955;&#955;&#951;&#957;&#953;&#954;&#941;&#962; &#955;&#941;&#958;&#949;&#953;&#962; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#945;&#965;&#964;&#941;&#962;), &#954;&#953; &#945;&#965;&#964;&#972; &#967;&#940;&#961;&#953;&#962; &#963;&#964;&#951; &#956;&#945;&#957;&#943;&#945; &#964;&#959;&#965; &#955;&#949;&#958;&#953;&#954;&#959;&#947;&#961;&#940;&#966;&#959;&#965; &#964;&#959;&#965; 5&#959;&#965; &#945;&#953;. &#956;.&#935;., &#919;&#963;&#973;&#967;&#953;&#959;&#965;



I've mentioned ''kebala'' before: see ]. ] 20:58, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Sorry, that slipped my mind. In fact, if we have ''Berenik&#275;'', but ''kebala'' what does that tell us about the Doricity of XMK? Shouldn't it be either ''Berenika'' or ''kebal&#275;''? ] <small>]</small> 20:59, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I saw the form ''kebale'' (don't know what value the 'e' had, it was transliterated) given on a website, but I can't vouch for it. ] 21:03, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
: :o) in fact, I begin to believe they were Dorians who had re-voiced their aspirates (and no, Ch'graphos didn't bribe me with alcohol). The name would have been ''Berenika'', but was changed back to ''-e'' as a matter of fact when Attic became the ''dernier cri''. This isn't compatible with the katadesmos, which is un-XMK in any case. This would mean that any word containing kh, ph or th must be foreign to XMK (i.e. chuck away all the names with Th, Ph etc., they're just Greek). We ''really'' need to find a case of intervocalic s! ] <small>]</small> 21:12, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::How about XMK just never got round to devoicing and (re)aspirating the PIE consonants that were devoiced and aspirated elsewhere, rather than being a form of Doric that had its aspirates revoiced? In other words, truly archaic Greek.--] 21:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::it wouldn't be Greek then, but "Graeco-Macedonian", i.e. the remaining Greek would have done a common innovation. That's also possible, of course. They would ''not'' be Dorians, in that case. We just don't know enough. ] <small>]</small> 21:45, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Thaethenae, that is what I've been arguing here from the beginning. The sound-differences are archaic and were retained in Macedonian, a language belonging to a Greco-Macedonian group. It is not unlikely, and I don't know why some Greeks abhor the idea (irrational reaction). ] 21:48, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Did they ''have'' to speak a Doric Greek dialect in order for one to connect to them? No. I can connect to them regardless of what language they spoke. I'm not a xenophobe. The words known from Macedonian suggest something beyond a Doric dialect. ] 21:50, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::I don't think it was Doric either. I was thinking more along the lines of ], which was related to but not quite the same as ]. "Both NW Greek and Doric are in some respects more archaic than the other Greek dialects." In other words, more IE, as the other Greek dialects arrived much earlier and absorbed significant pre-Hellenic substratal elements. I guess that begs the question, how do you define "Greek"? Perhaps the traditional definition is no longer valid. I'd say that Macedonian was definitely Hellenic in the Indo-European sense, and "Greek" would've probably remained pretty damn similar were it not for the non-IE influences.--] 22:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:I'd like to see this article expanded ]. ] 22:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Whoa, guys. Panayiotis from Melbourne gives '''&#945;&#954;&#961;&#959;&#965;&#957;&#959;&#943;''' for our ''arounoi'' 'boundary stones'. Was this just a typo? Because if it is actually ''akrounoi'', that would immediately invoke '''{{Polytonic|&#7936;&#947;&#961;&#972;&#962;}}''' 'field', which is exactly what these stones would have been used to divide.--] 21:15, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't know what the original manuscript says nor did I add the current spelling to the article, but ''akrounoi'' to me recalls ''akro-'' (PIE *ak, summit), which could mean 'edge, boundary', often prefixed to other words (cf. Akro-lithos, 'ends made of stone'). ] 21:20, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:You're right, ]. I thought of that immediately after my last post, but was thrown off by XMK's wacky voicing patterns. '''{{Polytonic|&#7940;&#954;&#961;&#959;&#962;}}''' 'at the end (or extremity)', from '''{{Polytonic|&#7936;&#954;&#942;}}''' 'point, edge'.--] 21:15, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


akrounoi it is. arounoi is my emendation of ''ahrounoi'' of Babaev's page, which is probably a typo (I didn't know what to make of ahrounoi, see above somewhere :\ ). ] <small>]</small> 21:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

On the subject of the glossary again, Perseus has a lot of these Macedonian words in its database: I've found ''ankalis'', ''abagna'', ''akrounoi'' (that spelling, and it is related to ''akros'' as I guessed), ''argipous'' (Mac.=aetos), ''arkon'', ''baskioi'', ''kombous'', ''sarissa'' (of course, common), ''kanadoi'', ''adis'', ''danos'' (>Macedonian word mentioned by Plutarch according to Perseus), and no doubt others, but I'll check later. ] 28 June 2005 06:53 (UTC)

''Berenike'' dates back to the time of Alexander the Great (was a common name among the Ptolemies who succeeded him, etc.), so ''extremely'' doubtful that the Pella Katadesmos is Macedonian (lacking voiced aspirates, etc.), and it's no wonder that Borza and others reject it, I assume (one of Borza's latest works is from 1999, so he would have known of the katadesmos). Borza by the way is in fact a highly regarded authority in Macedonian studies, not just linguistics. His works are even referenced as authoritative by Errington who I mentioned before, among others. So Borza carries as much weight as Hammond in the field: Borza of course has also criticized Hammond and is directly opposed to him. I'm going to look for works by both authors and compare. It seems, judging by criticisms I've read, that Hammond has also made contradictory statements in the manner of Errington (no concerted conspiracy going on, it's apparently a tendency among many of these individuals). ] 28 June 2005 06:44 (UTC)

==Phila, again==
moved to ]. ] <small>]</small> 28 June 2005 07:17 (UTC)

==Sensational new find!==
This just in: an engraved stone ''stele'' found last week at the ] excavation, which has been going on for several years under Prof. Pandermalis of the Aristotle University of Macedonia. Work on deciphering is being done very actively, but nothing they would tell me about. I cannot make anything out of the text myself, but I think I can discern some IE elements. Here is the text as emailed to me, have a go at it everyone:

ΑΛΣΑΛΥΤΣΥΝΤΕΥΥΝΗΑΙΔΥΚ<br/>
ΣΙΤΕΙΥΒΙΡΕΑΜΕΑΠΡΙΜΕΣΤΕΦΕΡΙΚΙΡΕΑ<br/>
ΑΛΟΣΥΝΤΕΥΠΙΚΣΟ<br/>
ΤΙΑΜΔΑΤΒΕΕΠΣΙΣΥΝΟΙΝΙΚ<br/>
ΔΑΡΣΑΣΤΙΙΝΥΤΙΚΕΡΝΙΜΙΚ<br/>
ΒΡΕΙΣΑΠΛΕΚΑΡΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΑΙΕΙ<br/>
ΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΑΙΕΙΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΑΝΥΝΑΙΕΙ<br/>
ΧΙΠΥΛΤΑΥΣΙΔΡΑΓΟΣΤΕΑΔΙΝΤΕΙ<br/>
ΜΙΑΜΙΝΤΕΣΚΔΕΟΚΧΙΤΕΙ<br/>
ΕΣΥΝΣΑΤΙΣΠΥΝΚΕΣΙΜΤΑΚΥΜ<br/>
ΑΛΟΙΥΒΙΡΕΑΜΕΑΣΥΝΤΕΥΦΙΡΕΑ<br/>
ΛΟΑΛΟΣΥΝΤΙΑΡΑΣΙΕΥΠΙΚΑΣ<br/>
ΤΙΑΜΔΑΤΒΕΕΠΣΘΣΥΝΤΒΟΙΝΙΚ<br/>
ΔΑΡΣΑΣΤΙΙΝΥΤΙΚΕΡΝΙΜΙΚ<br/>
ΒΡΕΙΣΑΠΛΕΚΙΔΑΡΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΑΙΕΙ<br/>
ΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΝΥΜΑΝΥΜΑΝΥΝΑΙΕΙ<br/>
ΧΙΠΥΛΤΑΥΣΙΔΡΑΓΟΣΤΕΑΔΙΝΤΕΙ<br/>
ΜΙΑΜΙΝΤΕΣΚΔΕΟΚΧΙΤΕΙ<br/>

All the excavators would tell me is that the obvious repetitive form suggests that the text is probably a (religious?) hymn or invocation. I am totally at a loss with this text, but I fear it will wipe out all previous theories about the Ancient Macedonian Language, having been found at the slopes of Mt. Olympus, in the great religious center of Dion ] 28 June 2005 09:55 (UTC)
:this is a hoax, right? or written in drunken stupor? probably by Dionysiophon celebrating he had got rid of that old hag Dagima. ] <small>]</small> 28 June 2005 10:04 (UTC)
::I'm not the alcoholic around here, Dab! Can you make anything of it? Don't call it a hoax just because it does not fit your preconceived notions :-P ] 28 June 2005 10:09 (UTC)

:What do you make out of it? I'm willing to listen to your opinion on it. ] 28 June 2005 10:12 (UTC)
:: ΣΥΝΤ reminds me of Latin "sunt", so it looks IE. Other than that, nothing. You? ] 28 June 2005 10:19 (UTC)

Looks like "]"---Alo, Alo, sunt Picasso...] 28 June 2005 10:22 (UTC)
::Really? Hey, I ''love'' that song! You don't say it's the lyrics, do you?!? Are you quite sure you are not making a mistake? Did you parse it word by word? ] 28 June 2005 10:30 (UTC)

No, I just recognized the lyrics. ] 28 June 2005 10:31 (UTC)

Mind if I erase it now? ] 28 June 2005 10:38 (UTC)
:Why are you not answering my question? What ''is'' Romania's top contribution to 20th (and 21st) century culture? ] 28 June 2005 10:39 (UTC)

My dick, and the way it slaps people across the face. ] 28 June 2005 10:41 (UTC)
:Oh, well... Still I think "Dragostea Tin Dei" takes top honors. That American archaeologist girl, Bernice, who works up in Dion, must have pulled a fast one on me just to embarrass me! Or maybe she ''likes'' me. She is gorgeous, you know. I think I'll call her ;-) ] 28 June 2005 10:45 (UTC)

Get a ], guys. http://albinoblacksheep.com/flash/numa --] 28 June 2005 11:07 (UTC)

Oh, and btw, ] aren't Rumanian, they're ]n.--] 28 June 2005 11:13 (UTC)
:Isn't Bernice a piece of work? She was laughing so hard she practically couldn't talk on the phone! She promised ''she will make it up to me''. What did she mean? ;-) Anyhow, '''Theathenae''', since Decius is too angry to answer, what do ''you'' consider Romania's top contribution to 20th century culture? I would say the ILLUSTRIOUS, MELLIFLUOUS, INGENIOUS mega-composer ], but Decius has ] (if one could call this excrement "music") ] 28 June 2005 11:21 (UTC)
::I know ] are ]n, but wasn't it the great Romanian orator '''Isocratescu''' who stated that "a Romanian is whoever partakes in Romanian culture"? I happen to agree with '''Isocratescu''': only a ] would insist on genetic purity (whatever that may mean) ] 28 June 2005 11:29 (UTC)
:::Was Isocratescu's "culture" precisely equivalent to the Greeks' '''{{Polytonic|παιδεία}}'''?--] 28 June 2005 11:31 (UTC)
::::I should imagine it is, but who knows what Romanians actually mean when they speak? They are mostly drunk. They drink to ]. ] 28 June 2005 11:41 (UTC)

:And why do Greeks drink? to forget how hairy they are? ] 28 June 2005 11:51 (UTC)
::Oooohhhh, that is a ''low blow'', Decius! How very unbecoming a ''Roman''. But apparently tall blonde Nordic girls like ''it'', so they flock to our islands looking for ''it''. So who are we to complain? ] 28 June 2005 12:03 (UTC)

Of course, Nordic girls are attracted to all kinds of ]. See also:. ] 28 June 2005 12:10 (UTC)
:There is an obvious '''racist''' element in your response, Decius, so I decline to dignify it with a substantive answer! ] 28 June 2005 12:17 (UTC) (BTW what time is it over there? Are you up early or up late? Don't you have to go to work? You ''are'' employed, aren't you?)
:Hey man, you started this. I'm just here slinging the insults that you seem to be demanding from me. ] 28 June 2005 12:22 (UTC)
::Bernice is justly proud of her sense of humor. I appreciated her prank, even if it was on my expense. I fail to see why you have to react ''so'' sullenly. Go to bed, Decius. It's not healthy, spending all night on the PC ] 28 June 2005 12:41 (UTC)

hey, stop deleting my decipherment claims! ] <small>]</small> 28 June 2005 12:45 (UTC)
:Decius deleted some of what I said as well, but I decided to be magnanimous and let it pass by. Why would the poor guy resort to censoring even the discussion page is beyond me. Or ]? ] 28 June 2005 12:51 (UTC)

What did I delete from your comments? ] 28 June 2005 12:52 (UTC)
:The first instance when I asked you what Romania's top contribution to 20th century culture was. Nevermind, though. I missed Dab's decipherment. Now that I followed the links he provided and read it, I reached a very useful conclusion: since you insist that the text is just some Romanian pop song lyrics, and Dab finds slavic words in it, doesn't this prove that Romanian is not a Romance language but a new branch of IE, the '''Slavolatin'''? I'm just just following your overall logic here, you see. :-))) ] 28 June 2005 13:00 (UTC)

No Doc, it doesn't. The thing that strikes people more about the Macedonian words are the ones that are similar to Greek, yet different (danos, kombous), not the words that are merely "foreign-like" (bedi). ] 28 June 2005 13:03 (UTC) 28 June 2005 13:03 (UTC)
:Ok, whatever. I don't speak Romanian, so what do I know? BTW who is the "Pherikirea" girl Dab referred to? The only Romanian girl I know '''of''' is a stripper, who took part in the Greek ] TV show last summer. She didn't win, but she was ''cute'' (although I disapprove of silicone breasts) ] 28 June 2005 13:10 (UTC)

By the way, I didn't delete your comments or dab's, it's a server glitch in this 'upgraded' Wiki. ] 28 June 2005 13:15 (UTC)
:No big deal. What worries me more is that this cute Survivor girl would have to work in some seedy strip joint, where she is ogled and pawed by paying customers, you know, hairy unshaven truckers and butchers and thugs. I wish she could have stayed home and go to college, or marry and raise a family, or both. I know, I sound conservative at times, but that's just me. Any luck on that "Pherikirea" woman? ] 28 June 2005 13:22 (UTC)

== Frication ==

], in relation to your '''{{Polytonic|ὑπὸ κατασκευὴν}}''' ] article, how much do you know about the history of the ] of β γ δ θ φ χ? Βερενίκη and Φερενίκη aren't all that different when the initial consonants are fricated; one is voiced, the other isn't. Likewise δανος and θάνατος, especially if PIE *dhenh.--] 28 June 2005 13:38 (UTC)
:Well, your question is too vague. I know more than nothing and less than everything, obviously :-)) Is there something specific you'd like to ask? Βερενίκη and Φερενίκη "aren't all that different" because they are the same word. It is interesting that the likes of Decius focus on it alone, for some weird reason, and refuse to examine the evidence offered by all surviving Macedonian names. Indeed what the survival of Βερενίκη as a personal name until Roman times (to the exclusion of the ''Koine'' form Φερενίκη) suggests, is that Macedonians were justly proud of their particular pronunciation and names, and sought to conserve them. Which suggests that the Macedonian personal name list is probably the single most valuable resource we have. The "strange sounding" words by Hesychius do not impress me at all. He, writing 10 centuries too late, is far more likely to select "exotic" words rather than plain Greek ones. Imagine the linguistic history of Macedonian and plain Greek '''reversed''': <scenario mode> plain Greek has all but disappeared whereas Macedonian is a living language to this day. A certain '''Thorybius''' (the opposite of Hesychius) writes a compilation of Greek ''glossai'' around 500 AD and includes "chrysos" (gold) in it. All the ''Decii'' of this world start screaming: "See, see, Greek was just '''Phoenician'''"! </scenario mode> But we'll discuss this more some other time. ] 28 June 2005 14:14 (UTC)
::What I meant was, is it indisputable that β was /b/ rather than /v/ or even /{{IPA|β}}/, that γ was /g/ rather than /{{IPA|ɣ}}/, that δ was /d/ rather than /ð/, etc.? Is W. Sidney Allen's ''Vox Graeca'' the absolute authority?--] 28 June 2005 14:45 (UTC)
:::I'll sidestep your question re ''Vox Graeca'' with the following: There is a 3rd century BC Beotian inscription that says "ΕΥΔΟΜΟΝ" instead of "ΕΒΔΟΜΟΝ". This means that ευ was already pronounced ev and β was pronoumced v ''at that time in that region'', or the mistake would not have happened. There is an inscription from Elis (I think) saying "Άσμητος" instead of "Άδμητος". This means that δ was already pronounced "th" ''at that time in that region'', and just like any German pronounces "that" as "zat", the scribe wrote σ (σ before μ is pronounced z). Spelling was diverging from pronunciation and the poor guy was at a loss. Aristophanes in the "Acharnians" has the Spartan envoy swear "μα τω σιώ" (by the Two Gods, i.e. Castor and Pollux, a standard Spartan invocation to the two Spartan royal princes who were deified). The form should be "μα τω θεώ" (Dual number). This means that the Spartans already pronounced θ the "modern" way, and Aristophanes had no way of writing it down as his θ was pronounced differently (aspirated T). So he wrote σ. Etc etc etc. '''Do not make me write the whole article right now, please'''. Just be patient. ] 28 June 2005 15:00 (UTC)
::::'''{{Polytonic|Ἐν τάξει, ἐν τάξει}}!''' I now feel vindicated in simply ''refusing'' to pronounce γ /g/ and δ /d/ in my ancient Greek classes. The professor's Greek sounded to me like the product of a western European conspiracy on the supposed pronunciation of ancient Greek, along the lines of the ] myth that the ancient Greeks were all tall, blond and blue-eyed. ("If they ''looked'' like us, they must have ''sounded'' like us too.") Surely Greek phonetics can't have changed ''that'' much by ] times.--] 28 June 2005 15:37 (UTC)
:::::Nevertheless ''Vox Graeca'' is correct about pronunciation, your professor notwithstanding. We, as Greeks, do not ''have'' to read Ancient Greek that way, although any scholar should try and fathom ancient pronunciation. Otherwise there is no way to comprehend, for example, Homeric metrics. So, reading for fun is one thing: I enjoy Plato in the original while reading it like ''katharevousa''. Reading for scholarship is another: . ] 28 June 2005 16:13 (UTC)
::::::Interesting, but still sounds exceedingly ]. This becomes even more evident in the voice-only audio samples on the next page. He even pronounces ρ as a German ], while his ] is replete with those rather annoying German ]s. Sounds more like ] than ancient Greek. Not authentic in the slightest.--] 28 June 2005 17:17 (UTC)
:::::::So? I LOVE ]! I love ], ], ] and ]. Of course he has his local accent. Doesn't everyone? '''Don't we?''' How else could it be? Can't you try to hear ''through the uvulars and the glottal stops'' and enjoy the music of the language? ]' lament for ] just broke my heart: "ώ μοι εγώ δειλή, ώ μοι δυσαριστοτόκεια" ] 28 June 2005 18:01 (UTC)
::::::::I can't say it brought me to tears, no. Pass me some of that torte, though.--] 28 June 2005 18:07 (UTC)
:::::::::Plain or with ''Schlagober'', you voracious ''']'''? :-PPP ] 28 June 2005 18:11 (UTC)
::::::::::''With'', of course. I have a healthy non-] appetite to whet.--] 28 June 2005 18:25 (UTC)
::::::::::: Me too! :-))) ] 28 June 2005 18:27 (UTC)
::::::::::::And I'm no Pig either. I'm a ] in ]. The ] is my mortal enemy. Compare the list of famous Snakes and Pigs, and you'll get my drift.--] 28 June 2005 18:37 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Therefore you are ]! :-}}} Whereas ] am intelligent, charming, persuasive, energetic, adaptive, funny, an appealing friend, generous, ] and ] (the remaining famous Rats do not apply to me) :-)))) ] 28 June 2005 19:22 (UTC)

::we have ''danos'', ''abroutes'', ''kebala'' and ''Berenike'' at least. That's at least a pattern. For all I care, we need not call the language "Macedonian" at all. We can call it "weird backward balkanese spoken by some mountain tribe hanging out in the remote areas of Macedon". Then we could say that "Macedonian" proper was 'of course' Doric Greek, and all Greeks would be happy. It's just an accident of terminology that not "weird backward balkanese" was chosen as a term for the language, but "Macedonian". We cannot just move the article to ] since that would be idiosyncratic terminology, but I really wish it was called that, so all the Greek patriots didn't imagine they had turf to defend here :) ] <small>]</small> 28 June 2005 14:33 (UTC)
:::No need to change anything in the article, relax, we are just discussing. And no, Macedonian was not just plain Doric, because there are strong Aeolian elements to be explained. There is no Greek patriot conspiracy against the truth. This is just your <Albanau mode> '''Switzerlandian''' ''(sic)'' ''' dogmatic paranoia''' </Albanau mode>. :-))) ] 28 June 2005 15:06 (UTC)
::::I see you admire ] and ] as much as I do.--] 28 June 2005 15:23 (UTC)
:::::Most fervently, especially Albanau. I even ]. ] 28 June 2005 15:57 (UTC)

The ancient pronunciation of β, γ, δ as b, g and d survives until today when they are preceded by μ and ν (e.g. γαμβρός, άνδρας, δένδρον, άγγελος). We don't notice it because sometimes the spelling is changed. In fact all phonology of ] has its origins at ancient times, either Classic or Hellenistic, while most ancient phonology survives in idioms of the modern language. ] 29 June 2005 04:49 (UTC)

==Briges==
I just stubled upon a passage in Herodotus (7.73, I think) where he says that the Macedonians (in ca. 500 BC) claim that the '']'', before they migrated to Anatolia (around 1200 BC), had called themselves ''Briges''. This is quite interesting. I take this to mean that the Macedonian re-voicing could have taken place between 1200 and 500. This is no proof in any way, but I suppose that if the Macedonians had never de-voiced in the first place, they would just have called the Phryges Phryges, as a foreign ethnonym, like everybody else. Also note that the claim isn't just that "the Phryges are called Briges in Macedonia", but that the Macedonians actually claim that the Phrygians themselves changed their own name. The other possibility of course would be that the Macedonians were right, and there is really a Proto-Macedo-Phrygian, and the Phrygians de-voiced only when they were in Anatolia. This seems much less likely to me, but I have to review the Phrygian corpus first. The upshot is, if you follow me, that XMK was '''Greek'''(yes!), with a strange ''re''-voicing of the aspirates. No proof, of course. Anyway, since we're not supposed to do original research, I'll just mention the ''Briges'' bit in the article for now. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 07:14 (UTC)

Yeah, I know about that. ''Briges'' was also recorded as the name of a Thracian tribe. A third possibility is that the Macedonians later incorrectly identified ''Briges'' (=Thracians) with Phrygians.] 29 June 2005 07:19 (UTC)

:no, I think it is quite established that the Phrygians did, in fact, emigrate from Thrace. '''Note''' however that we may be claiming that, if both Macedonian and Phrygian are "Greek", the ] ''may'' also need to be considered Greek. I.e. if you want to argue the Macedonians are "Hellenes", linguistically, you'd need to admit that the ] are Hellenes too. After some very weird sound changes, of course. I do think the term "Graeco-Armenian" is better suited for the theory than "Hellenic", in any case :) ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 07:33 (UTC)
::It's all a matter of degree and interpretation, ultimately, as all those languages are related to a greater or lesser extent. Macedonian was clearly closer to "Greek" than Armenian, even if Armenian is ''now'' the closest language to Greek. The "closest" doesn't necessarily mean all that "close", however. XMK is clearly recognisable to me as a Greek language; Armenian is not.--] 29 June 2005 09:45 (UTC)
:::sure, but ''if'' Armenian is descended from common Graeco-Phrygo-Armenian, historically, we'd have no choice but to classify Armenian as a really far out Modern Greek dialect. Just like we classify ] as ], although it doesn't really preserve much of the grammar of Sanskrit. This is all uncertain, but "Graeco-Macedonian" is the superior terminology, because it is unambiguous. Calling Graeco-Macedonian "Hellenic" because people ''want'' the Macedonians to be Hellenes is just as bad as ''not'' calling Graeco-Armenian "Hellenic" because people ''don't'' want the Armenians to be Hellenes. We're just drawing trees, here. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 10:05 (UTC)

I don't think it's been established, it may be a myth. And see also John Wilkes (Roman archaeologist), ''The Illyrians'' (1992), pg. 145: "''Other coincidences of ethnic names supported notions of a connection between the Balkans and Asia Minor, the Mysians in the latter matching the Balkan Moesians and the Phrygians corresponding to the Briges''". Besides the Briges in Thrace, there was also a tribe known as ''Briges'' near Epidamnus in Illyria. It's too hazardous to be convincing. Elaborate myths were often woven around these similar ethnonyms (see ], ]). ] 29 June 2005 07:40 (UTC)

ok, I just noticed that the famous Phrygian ''bekos'' "bread" shows "Macedonian" behaviour, i.e. it would be ''*phegos'' in Greek. Phrygian is really in a similarly tantalizing way similar to Greek as XMK... ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 08:06 (UTC)

Thracian also is known to have voiced rather than devoiced (forgot the examples, but they are agreed upon). ] 29 June 2005 08:08 (UTC)
:yes, I am saying that this supports the tradition that the Phrygians came from the Balkans. I note there is Attic (aorist) ''ephokha'' < ''*ebhéhgshe'', root-cognate to ''bekos''. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 08:10 (UTC)
::I'm skeptical about all these migration theories. Obviously migrations ''did'' happen in prehistorical times, but I wonder if they can be reconstructed now with any degree of accuracy. Witness all these conflicting theories about IE migration (Gimbutas vs. Renfrew etc). While we can be certain that some of these myths ''do'' contain an attavistic handdown of genuine collective memory, as opposed to pure mythical baloney, it's practically impossible to say which is which. ] 29 June 2005 08:52 (UTC)

:::] is the ], man! we are not talking about chalcolithic kurgan migrations, we are talking about a tradition of a "mere" 700 years. Miskin here claims that the Hellenes were one ethnos since 2900 years, by comparison. This is slightly over the top, of course, but ethnic identities may well remain consistent over a millennium or so. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 09:12 (UTC)
::::"Ethnos" is a relatively modern concept. I don't think it can be uniformly applied in retrospect. As for Herodotus, well, I am a staunch ] myself ] 29 June 2005 10:09 (UTC)
:I've also previously proclaimed my esteem for Thucydides on ]. And it's interesting that he consistently separated Macedonians from Hellenes when the issue came up (at least, on all instances I've seen from him). ] 29 June 2005 10:14 (UTC)
::Mayahi, mayahoo, mayaho, mayaHAHA! ] 29 June 2005 10:56 (UTC)
:Tell that to Thucydides... ] 29 June 2005 11:04 (UTC)
::Was at ] Sunday, had coffee by the sea. ] 29 June 2005 11:27 (UTC)
===Phoenician inscription===
This belongs on ], but since we're here:
what can we say about this "Phoenician inscription of Edessa",
:'' Perdikas son of Argeo(s) leading his Makestes (Macedonians) when approached to Vedissa (Edessa) citadel, coming down from upper Illyria, offered sacrifice to uppermost (god) Savaz(i)os. Then when conquered entire Midas country, being outraged with foreign Greeks who were charged for intrigues, extincted them immediatelly while released indigenous Briges (Phrygians) to wander away, because both these people spoke different languages. Since then being elder sovereign of Brigea (Phrygia) enjoyed the profits of this most ancient city renaming it to Aegae while kept repelling fugitives to return with excemption of captives. Dredas son of Gordios chiseled this marble chronicle in Greek language to memory of sorrowful remembrance.''
the website looks a tad kooky, is this inscription real? ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 08:14 (UTC)

That site was baffling me a few months ago, and it may be a hoax. I've seen a totally different translation of the same text on another site (forgot which)---a fake tablet? or just spurious translations of a real archaeological find? I don't know. ] 29 June 2005 08:16 (UTC)
:they try to sell you a print of the inscription, and their images are blurred on purpose. Not a very reliable authority, I'd say. They also seem to have some sort of agenda, although I didn't bother which. Note also this dead Greek site preserved in google cache: . It also pretends to give the original text,
:ΠΕΡΔΙΚΑΣ ΑΡΓΑΙΟ ΚΑΡΑΝΙΟΝ ΙΔΙΟΙΣ ΜΑΚΕΣΤΑΙΣ ΚΑΘΥΠΕΡΘΕΝ ΙΛΛΥΡΑΙΑΣ ΑΓΧΙΜΟΛΟΣ ΕΠ ΑΚΡΑ :ΒΕΔΣ ΣΑΣΣΑΒΑΖΟ ΟΦΣΙΜΕΔΟΝΤΙ ΕΡΕΧΣΕΝ ΜΙΔΟΥ ΕΠΑΝ ΑΙΑΝ ΚΑΣΧΕΘΕ ΟΘΝΕΙΟΥΣ ΓΡΕΚΕΣΤΑΣ ΕΠΙ ΣΚΕΥΟΡΗΜΑΣΙ ΛΕΛΟΙΔΟΡΗΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΑΥΘ ΑΝΗΡΕ ΣΚΥΔΜΑΙΝΟΝ ΒΡΥΓΑΣ ΔΕ ΠΑΛΑΙΧΘΟΝΑΣ ΑΛΑΣΘΑΙ ΤΗΛΟΘ ΕΙΕ ΑΜΦ ΑΛΛΟΘΡΟΑΣ ΕΚ ΤΟΥ ΤΟ ΠΑΛΛΙΣΤΟΝ ΑΣΤΥ ΑΙΓΑΣ ΠΡΟΣΓΟΡΕΥΣΑΣ ΕΚΑΡΠΟ ΚΡΑΝΤΟΡ ΔΗ ΒΡΥΓΑΙΑΣ ΓΕΡΑΙΤΕΡΟΣ ΠΑΛΙΝΤΡΑΠΕΛΟΥΣ ΑΛΑΛΚΕ ΠΛΗΝ ΖΟΓΡΗΜΕΝΟΝ ΤΟ ΔΟΥΝ ΜΑΡΜΑΡΕΟΝ ΜΝΑΜΑΤΟΣ ΧΑΡΙΝ ΔΡΕΔΑΣ ΓΟΡΔΙΟΥ ΓΡΕΚΙΣΤΙ ΕΧΣΕΣΕΝ ΕΣ ΓΡΑΜΑΤΕΑ ΛΥΓΡΑ
It totally looks like a hoax. ''Grekestas''? ''Bryges''? (Hdt has ''Briges'')
] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 08:28 (UTC)

Probably a hoax, but it doesn't look like ]. Even if it's a hoax, it would be interesting to find out how it originated. ] 29 June 2005 08:36 (UTC)

ok, it's a total hoax. They date it to the 9th century. If it was real, the academic world would be in an ''uproar''! How convenient, a 9th century inscription telling us in plain words that the Macedonians spoke a language different from Greek. They didn't even try to make the text look archaic. Just forget it, the Dragostea was more inspired. I guess this is the "panslavicist" side of the argument :) ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)

Or "pan-Albanian"---I saw the same translation given on an Albanian propaganda site that somehow used the text to prove that the Macedonians were an Illyrian tribe. ] 29 June 2005 08:44 (UTC)

It's fishy ''and'' I smell a rat too. "Dredas" even spells ''gramatea'' wrong. And that ''λυγρά'' thingie: too corny! Not to mention ''grEkestas''. That such an inscription would be only deciphered by an esteemed Lebanese scholar and find its way to a humble Geocities webpage. The injustice of it all ... ] 29 June 2005 08:52 (UTC)

:well, it's allegedly transcribed from the Phoenician alphabet, so you cannot really complain about the missing eta. But it is true that it's a really pathetic forgery. I mean, they don't even bother to make the image of the transcription legible. No expert would be fooled for more than ten seconds by this, but I am sure a lot of Albanian kids are dead convinced now that the Illyricity of Macedon is firmly established :) ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 09:04 (UTC)
::not true, they claim they have an eta. man, this thing would revolutionize our knowledge of the genesis of the Greek alphabet, if only it were real! ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 09:06 (UTC)

I wonder if this is just an internet hoax, or a "big-time" hoax that made it into tabloid newspapers and t.v. shows. ] 29 June 2005 09:09 (UTC)

As so often, I am struck by the lengths nationalist will go to create their own version of history.--] 29 June 2005 09:10 (UTC)

Hmm, most likely the blame goes to a Macedonian Slav rather than an Albanian---but where does the Lebanese guy fit in? I find this an interesting hoax. ] 29 June 2005 09:14 (UTC)

:I wrote them an email, asking them to join us here :) ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 09:21 (UTC)
::Do they have Internet in Lebanon? Or electricity around the clock for that matter? :-))) ] 29 June 2005 10:09 (UTC)
:::I resent that! One of the loveliest women I known lives in Lebanon, and we stay in touch over the Net >:-(.--] 29 June 2005 10:53 (UTC)
::::As we say in Greece, "pussy hair can tow ships" :-PPP ] 29 June 2005 11:03 (UTC)



I hope you guys are not seriously about this. This is one of the oldest hoaxes in the book and it's been on the internet for sometime now. Its main page is the geocities site and then it could also be linked by Bulgarian or Slavo-Macedonian universities (imagince the level). Yes, I know what you're thinking, like Wiglaf said some people are pretty desperate. The fact that you people linked this site here automatically degrades the level of the the article. Yes, yes I know how you were all discussing what an "interesting hoax" it is, but having to discuss over something that obvious could also pose a problem. I mean, for crying out loud, even if you've missed all technical obvious reasons to it, this text is to Ancient Greek what Swahili would be to Latin. The hoax-master was such an amateur that he even used the word "Greek". I mean besides the fact that the word "ΓΡΕΚΙΣΤΙ" has absolutely no meaning in Ancient Greek as "Graecus" is spelled with an 'AI', the term "Greek" was '''never'''' used as a collective term for the Greek-speaking peoples prior to the rise of ]. The collective names were "Hellenes" or "Ionians" (used by Greeks and Asians respectively). The Graeci were originally a tribe of Thessaly whose colonisers came in contact with the Romans until their name became gradually a collective term. And as I said earlier, prior to the 9th century BC, there is no reference of collective term. I never meant that Greeks have been a nation (in its modern meaning) since 900BC dab, stop trying to present me as a extremist by manipulating my words. ] 29 June 2005 10:59 (UTC)
:Well, bro, have I got news for you: Decius Maximus Suahilus was a quaestor around 300 BC. He, being a thug and a bully, tried to get adopted by a prominent Roman patrician, and on succeeding he changed his name to Decius Maximus Claudius Suahilianus. He then killed his adoptive father and embezzled his fortune, used it to bribe people and get elected senator, but made the fatal mistake of raping a vestal Virgin. He was executed, and his bastard baby was sold to a merchant in Carthage. The rest is history :-}}} ] 29 June 2005 11:12 (UTC)
::Oh, and I ''forgot'' to cover this rascal's name etymology: being a poor, destitute family, they were nicknamed "Zero pigs" (Suus Nihil), as they had no domestic animals (except mice). Then they dropped the "Ni" part and the nickname stuck. (The dropped "Ni" was picked up later in time by the ] and gradually found its way into Medieval folklore). ] 29 June 2005 11:54 (UTC)
:quite so, but note that the link is only from the talk page of this article, therefore it has no impact on our article's quality. Sorry, I didn't want to portray as an extremist. I do believe you are really moderate, especially recently. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 11:13 (UTC)


===copy-paste of "ethnos" above===
:::what do you mean, modern concept? ''ethnos'' means ''nation'', in the sense of ''tribe'', from at least Herodotus (while in Homer, it apparently means "warband"). ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 10:15 (UTC)
:::: "In the sense of" being the operative words. "In the sense of" the New Testament, ''ethnos'' is any population of non-Christians. The devil is in the details, my friend :-) ] 29 June 2005 10:53 (UTC)
:::::I obviously meant to say that "Miskin claims Greeks as an ethnos ''in the sense of bloody tribe just like in bloody Herodotus'' are aged 2900" :P ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 11:06 (UTC)
::::::By this bloody definition, the bloody Hellenes considered themselves a bloody nation when they got their bloody ships together in bloody Aulis and sailed over the bloody (sorry, ''wine-dark!'') sea to get to bloody Troy and bloody get that ] back! There they fought for ten bloody years and a lot of bloody blood was, er, bled :-}} ] 29 June 2005 11:20 (UTC)
:::::::A battle which is just as credible as the ], *rolleyes*.--] 29 June 2005 11:37 (UTC)
By "ethnos" I would refer to a collective term that describes peoples of common cultural and linguistic elements. In that sense we can talk about the Keltic ethnos, the Germanic ethnos, the Thracian ethnos, the Hellenic ethnos, and even the modern Arabic ethnos etc. The modern notion of "nation" (which also translates into Greek as 'ethnos'), refers to the unity of a large group of people under a common '''state'''. In that respect, Greeks and Cypriots are two different nations of the Hellenic ethnos. ] 29 June 2005 11:34 (UTC)

== Anti-nationalist hoax ==

The site mentioned above is linked to by http://geocities.com/makedonia007/index.html, part of a webring of one (or more) loony propagandist(s) identifying as ethnic Bulgarians living in "Greek-occupied Macedonia". (They all share a common contact email address: kaltsef@hotmail.com.) But the fact that most of the pages are entirely in Greek with no English or other translations leads me to believe that this is an elaborate hoax by Greek anarchists who are known for their catchy anti-nationalist slogans like "The Aegean belongs to the fish". If they really were aggrieved Bulgarian nationalists, they probably wouldn't use the spelling МАКЕДОНИЈА, or promote the "Macedonian" Orthodox Church. The sites' intent appears to be to piss off the Greeks rather than promote "Bulgarian human rights in Macedonia". One of the more colourful articles is entitled "The Greeks, descendants of savages from Ethiopia". I wouldn't take anything on these sites even remotely seriously.--] 29 June 2005 10:41 (UTC)
:Skopjans calling Ethiopians "savages"? This must be the ].
::this is really funny then, anarchists from Thessaloniki taking the piss out of frowning nationalists, also from Thessaloniki? Or maybe serious Greek nationalists on a quest to make the Bulgarians look silly? the possibilities... If they are really anarchists with a taste for the absurd, I may live to regret I invited them to WP, though :\ ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 11:09 (UTC)
:::''Bloody'' Thessalonikeans! They eat too much ''bougatsa'' and ]! :-P ] 29 June 2005 11:31 (UTC)

Ancient Ethiopians were not savages, according to Greek mythology they were Gods' sacred race (of course propagandists didn't know that). Anyway the "ancient Greeks were immigrants from Egypt and Ethiopia while Macedonian Slavs are the oldest people in the region" hoax, is another amusing attempt from Bulgaro-Slavic nationalist to lay claims on Greek soil. I never really understood the point of that hoax. Is it just supposed to trace some "Macedonian genes" back into time and at the same time "insult" Greeks by inventing an African origin for them? Imagine that in those people's minds, a non-european (non-white) origin is something degrading. I hope Dab and Decius see with what kind of backwards inbreds do people like me have to deal with. ] 29 June 2005 11:34 (UTC)
:They got it from ]'s genetic studies, which identified what he calls a "Subsaharan" gene in the Greek population. If true, this is a finding that makes me very proud. I am a big believer in ]. Not to mention that such a gene would be a great advantage in ]. ] 29 June 2005 11:42 (UTC)
::Nah, they just faked the whole thing from scratch, they even added a fake historical background. I read it once and it was simply laughable, especially to people with basic knowledge on the subject. I'll try to find it again. ] 29 June 2005 12:11 (UTC)
From here in Los Angeles, I can only imagine how this propaganda translates into daily life in the Balkans (I'm guessing it translates into sporadic violence). So, does violence still often break out between Macedonian Slavs and Greeks? I haven't seen it on the news and I don't know the situation there. Or are both sides a bunch of pussies who are all talk and no action?] 29 June 2005 11:39 (UTC)
:Living in Los Angeles and ] for a living, you can only perceive things in terms of violence. But worry not about Macedonian Slavs in Greece. They are being treated ''very'' well, all fifty of them ] 29 June 2005 12:06 (UTC)

I doubt the overwhelming majority of people in the Balkans could give a ]'s arse. The Greeks are too busy checking out the ] at the beach, and the Slavs are too busy printing counterfeit ]s and applying for ] ] to get to the ].--] 29 June 2005 12:10 (UTC)
:Don't be too harsh on them, they also want to visit their ] ] 29 June 2005 12:14 (UTC)

You guys disappoint me. I was hoping to see a war break out...] 29 June 2005 12:16 (UTC)
:I happen to be privy to a secret plan: if those fifty troublemakers get feisty, they will be deported to ]. The rationale is that they will fit very well there, ] being a country of superficially Latinized ]. ] 29 June 2005 12:26 (UTC)

And Greece being a country of superficialy hellenized Turks, of course. ] 29 June 2005 12:32 (UTC)
:Not according to ] ] 29 June 2005 14:03 (UTC)
lol. I don't think Romanians can be considered as Latinised Slavs, because the Slavs migrated in the region long after the Latinisation of Dacia had ended. Greeks can't be considered as Hellenised Turks either, because in the Ottoman Empire it was only the Christian subjects who were allowed to convert into muslim, not the other way around. There's probably many "Turkified" Greeks however (as there are Latinised or "Italified"). Besides, the original Turkic phenotype that sacked Constantinople was probably closer to the Mongolian and Southern Chinese. ] 29 June 2005 12:57 (UTC)

Decius despite what those people claim, it's literally more likely to meet a Turk in Norway than a Skopjan in Greek Macedonia. How can there be any violence if there's practically no minority? The 20 people who comprise the Skopjan political party Rainbow (got something like 100 votes in the elections) are the only official record I'm aware of and that's because they have a website. Once they tried to put up some propaganda posters written in Cyrillic but had their office smashed on the next day, and "thus was this matter settled". Macedonian Slavs will claim that some 95% of Greek Macedonia is ethnic Skopjan, opressed by the Greek government and forbidden to speak its language etc, etc, etc. The story about the infamous "partition" of Macedonia refers to the defeat of Bulgaria during the Balkan Wars. Of course there's no record of a "Macedonian" army ever taking part, although in their history books it can reach up to 100,000 soldiers (that would be 1/6 of the army of Napoleon and slightly smaller that the army that conquered ] under Mehmed II). I mean those people are bitching about a territory that they didn't manage to '''steal''' in the last century and expect to be taken seriously. Imagine what kind of bitching would equivalently Greeks be entitled to against the Turks, for their mass expulsion from regions that had been inhabited by Greeks since ancient times (such as coastal Asia Minor, Constantinople, Pontus, Cyprus etc, etc)... ] 29 June 2005 12:44 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear that this controversy about ancient Macedon doesn't translate often into actual violence. Then we can all sit back, chill out, and gather more references for these articles instead of just deleting stuff (hint, hint). ] 29 June 2005 12:50 (UTC)
:Decius, this is the European Union. We settle differences differently. BTW do you want Romania to join the EU?

Chronographos (if this is you), I don't represent Romania, so the outrageous things I say in Misplaced Pages should not influence international policy---if it does, they should make me President. ] 29 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)
:], but Presidents are not ''made'', they are elected (except in the USA). Nevertheless, your opinion about Romania's accession is unimportant. As is the opinion of all Romanians, wherever they may live. Romania's accession will flunk the ''referenda'', at about ]. ] 29 June 2005 14:11 (UTC)

Ooh, Chrono, you talk a lot don't you? Why don't you reveal your name for all to know, unless you prefer to hide? ] 29 June 2005 14:06 (UTC)
:Hide? ''Moi''? '''Jamais!''' ] 29 June 2005 14:11 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I thought, you fucking '''faggot'''. Now do this talk page a vafor and shut the fuck up, because it has been straying off topic every time you make a comment. ] 29 June 2005 14:12 (UTC)

==ok, so, ==
while you're all here, can we get a full list of Macedonian words from Hesychius or something? You know, for the article... ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 12:19 (UTC)
:Sorry, I need to run to the supermarket. Just found out I'm out of ] ] 29 June 2005 12:25 (UTC)
:: C: Greek Feta? O: Uh, not as such.
I don't have the Hesychius text. However, you previously stated that you have it, and would share it if someone requested it. ] 29 June 2005 12:22 (UTC)
:Yeah, dab!--] 29 June 2005 12:32 (UTC)

::ok, I'm working on it. But I cannot finish this today. See ]. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 13:00 (UTC)

There's no hurry dab, and I consider that a heroic jest just typing up what you've typed already. I'll see what I can decipher from the Greek text. ] 29 June 2005 13:05 (UTC)
:typing? You don't seriously suppose I'm typing out Hesychius for you? That would be a heroic jest indeed :) ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 13:07 (UTC)

:You're right: a check of the history shows timespan impossible for typing. ] 29 June 2005 13:45 (UTC)
::Im ''formatting''. I've actually got it now, and am trying to post it in two chunks. ] <small>]</small> 29 June 2005 13:46 (UTC)

==Andriotes==
In the book of Andriotes it is mentioned the name of another lexigographer of Macedonian, which I personally had never heard of. The name is ΑΜΕΡΙΑΣ, in English "Amerias" maybe? I haven't found anything on the internet. ] 29 June 2005 13:17 (UTC)

Actually I just found something: http://www.hri.org/docs/macque/text4.html
I know that for some people this site can't be considered neutral, yet it's the '''only''' source on the internet that refers to this name. It says that Amerias was a Macedonian lexicographer on which Hesychius was based. Therefore the assumptions of the Macedonian dialect surviving until the 5th century AD becomes moot... ] 29 June 2005 13:29 (UTC)

That's fine if the Macedonian language became extinct earlier than the 5th century AD. The note in the website says that info is from ''The History of Greek Writing'', Ant. Thavoris. ] 29 June 2005 13:35 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that Amerias didn't exist because he's only seen so far in Greek sources? ] 29 June 2005 13:41 (UTC)

No, I didn't suggest that. I actually think that info is 80% credible. I was pointing out it's from an actual book (actually two books, Andriotes and Thavoris), not just a website. ] 29 June 2005 13:45 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:47, 8 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ancient Macedonian language article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconGreece Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconClassical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Misplaced Pages's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLanguages Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Ancient Macedonian language received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which on April 2008 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

No proofs whatsoever that Ancient Macedonian was a different language from Ancient Greek

As for the fact that sometimes Ancient Macedonian words (from Hesychius' glossary) "reveal voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates", meaning b,d,g, instead of ph, th, kh, a similar, yet not identical thing occurs in German, i.e. within the same language, between dialects of the same language: Low German lopen vs. (High/literary/standard) German laufen, Low German riek, German reich. This Ancient Macedonian shift constitutes by no means a proof that Ancient Macedonian was a different language from Ancient Greek. 2A02:2F07:91EF:FFFF:0:0:4F71:7B3B (talk) 04:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The wording in the article is the result of much careful work from many editors. There is no evidence that the consensus for the current wording has changed. --Taivo (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

I just gave you the evidence above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graecophile (talk • contribs) 15:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Where are you even getting this information from? Without an academic source on the matter (such as a study by a university press or accredited institution), this might as well be your personal blog and your fanciful opinion. Personally, I think the ancient Macedonian language was a dialect of Greek thanks to pieces of evidence like the Pella curse tablet, but my opinion doesn't mean anything on Misplaced Pages, only cited material counts. For that matter, talk pages of articles are not forums for debate, they are venues for discussing how to improve the existing article. See WP:FORUM among other things in Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not. Taivo is right: this article represents the culmination of not only consensus among editors here, but also reflects scholarly opinion and academic consensus. Pericles of Athens 17:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

...In sum, despite what we think about the matter, only the words and ideas of scholars and academics matter here, and some of them have radically different theories about the classification of the ancient Macedonian language. Pericles of Athens 17:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The Ancient Macedonian language from Hesychius' glossary looks different from the one of the Pella curse tablet. My opinion is we are talking about two different Greek dialects. The wikipedia article on Ancient Macedonian mentions that some of the words in Hesychius' glossary "reveal voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates", meaning b,d,g, instead of ph, th, kh which is no proof for its non-Greekness. A similar, yet not identical thing occurs in German, i.e. within the same language, between dialects of the same language: Low German lopen vs. (High/literary/standard) German laufen, Low German riek, German reich.

Who said we are not discussing how to improve the article? I was trying to insert this comparison with German language and I don't understand why it is constantly deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graecophile (talk • contribs) 04:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

It will continue to be deleted as long as you don't provide a reliable published source for the claim.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Did you not read my post at all? The single problem others are having with your edits is that they are completely without a source other than your opinion, apparently, since you have failed to provide us with any sort of inline citation quoting or citing an academic source. Unless your edit is based on information found in a book, journal article, or online page connected to a scholarly institution (university, library, museum, historical society, etc.) then I'm afraid your edits will be reverted for clearly violating Misplaced Pages:No original research. Since you basically talked right over me and failed to observe any of my points, I'll politely end the conversation here as well, since you seem incapable of having a normal conversation. --Pericles of Athens 16:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Isn't there a rule against people that lack common sense and education like "Pericles of Athens"? He should be banned for breaking the rules. What do you mean "I am incapable of having a normal conversation"? Who do you think you are to allow yourself such a language towards me? Are you Greek? Or are you a Slavic so-called "Macedonian" impersonating a Greek? My comparison with German dialects is indeed an original research. So what? That's probably not the first time OR is inserted into wikipedia. It is a good argument in favor of the Greekness of Ancient Macedonian, so you should accept it, unless you are a non-Greek. A consonantal shift is no proof of a different language. That is what I wanted to emphasize. That there are no proofs that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect, even though some of its words show a consonant shift. That's no OR, stating that a consonant shift isn't enough to turn a dialect into a different language. Only the comparison with German (or any other language) is indeed an OR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graecophile (talk • contribs) 12:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

It is not allowed to insert Original Research into articles, and while it has certainly been done before, it is our job as editors to remove it when we see it. So please do not insert it again, now that you have clearly understood that it is OR and therefore against the rules. No part of this argument can be added without support in reliable sources. Speculating about other editors ethnicity or using it as an argument is also against the rules by the way. So you need to find a very different approach here, or you will simply end up banned.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 04:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
What you don't seem to understand, Graecophile, is that your personal opinion, no matter what data you base it on, is no more than personal opinion. Only the opinions of reliable sources matter. And, in this case, the reliable sources are mixed in their appraisals of how closely related to Ancient Greek the Ancient Macedonian language was. Scholarly opinion ranges from your nationalistic "It's simply Greek" to "It's not Attic Greek, but it's Doric Greek" to "It's not Greek, but it's close to Greek". So the article will continue to reflect the scholarly variation. That's the end of the matter until some future time when scholarly opinion might change. But it might not ever change without further evidence of the Ancient Macedonian language coming to light. --Taivo (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

This is the exact quotation from the article page: "There are, however, a number of words that are not easily identifiable as Greek and reveal, for example, voiced stops where Greek shows voiceless aspirates". It refers to the Ancient Macedonian words of Hesychius' glossary. Since you people obviously lack the power to understand simple sentences I will say it again: the above quotation has no relevance, since there are many words in (for instance) German dialects that are not present in standard German and also there are consonantal shifts between dialects of German and standard German. Neither of those 2 is an argument for the non-Greekness of Ancient Macedonian. That should be stated in the article since the above quotation induces, suggests the idea that Ancient Macedonian might not have been Greek based on phony arguments. I hope I made myself clear now, although I am not sure, given your intellectual power. And stop calling me names and threatening me with being banned since I have done nothing to break the rules. If you want to ban somebody, ban "Pericles of Athens" for calling me stupid ("you obviously can't have a normal conversation"). You people are very rude, aggressive and abusive. It is not my fault that you can't understand simple phrases, but to call me names and threaten me at the same time, that is too much. I say it again: the above quotation's text is irrelevant and misleading, people who have no knowledge of linguistics, that is the vast majority of wikipedia users, are inclined to believe that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect, based on 2 phony arguments. The following text should be added to the quotation: "yet these are no conclusive arguments that Ancient Macedonian was no Greek dialect" or "yet there are specific words and consonant shifts in many dialects of many languages". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graecophile (talk • contribs) 01:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Macedonian language it has nothing to do with the Greek language.I believe that everyone rights stories that feats there narrative! I can’t believe it everything that I read in the Misplaced Pages is all twisted when you read about Alexander the Great he was Macedonian. Yes at that time there was Ancient Macedonia the Greek name did not exist in that time . Greece name was born in 1832 and now Greeks claim’s Macedonia to be Ancient Greece that’s absolutely 💯 not true ✌🏻🙏🏻 2603:9009:601:8B54:FDCD:CF28:984C:C597 (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Categories: