| Revision as of 00:42, 30 June 2005 edit130.203.202.156 (talk) →POV← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:36, 28 July 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:History of Pakistan/Archive 1) (bot |
| (770 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{talk header}} |
|
I've fixed the BBC poll results that somebody added so they tally with http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2017631.stm - if there is some other survey which matches the figures which were given here, then a source should be given for it. I also have very severe doubts about some other changes recently made by the same user (see http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=History_of_Pakistan&diff=439956&oldid=439933 ) - unfortunately, I'm not knowledgeable enough about the subject to fix this up myself. --] 03:28 Nov 23, 2002 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{calm}} |
|
---- |
|
|
|
{{Pakistani English}} |
|
UserPakAtheist removed: |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=Top|History=y}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject History |importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject British Empire |importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject India |importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|importance=High}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{contentious topics/talk notice|ipa}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| algo = old(31d) |
|
|
| archive = Talk:History of Pakistan/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter = 1 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{To do}} |
|
|
{{archives}} |
|
|
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|
|
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#The Shahi Kingdoms and the Muslim invasions) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"The Shahi Kingdoms and the Muslim invasions","appear":{"revid":188878597,"parentid":188876748,"timestamp":"2008-02-03T20:53:17Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":824844413,"parentid":824055114,"timestamp":"2018-02-09T21:13:00Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> |
|
|
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#The Shahi Kingdoms and the Muslim invasions) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"The Shahi Kingdoms and the Muslim invasions","appear":{"revid":188878597,"parentid":188876748,"timestamp":"2008-02-03T20:53:17Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":824844413,"parentid":824055114,"timestamp":"2018-02-09T21:13:00Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Geography == |
|
India defeated Pakistan in all the three wars that it launched. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What step took Muslim rules to resit British ] (]) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
A recent survey conducted by ] for the ], found that 61% of Kashmiris would prefer Indian citizenship, 6% would prefer Pakistani, with 33% undecided . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Fasial masjid kis ne Azad karwaya == |
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fasial masjid kis ne Azad karwaya ] (]) 09:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
I disagree. While all surveys are inherently biased, it is still useful information. It should up to the reader to beware the potential for error. I think the BBC can be trusted enough to not further any political purpose. Are there any other surveys by different organizations supporting or debunking these results? Those would help... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== History == |
|
And what's wrong with that general statement? Isnt it true? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
پاکستان کے وجود کے لیے اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے کردار پر تح تحقیق کریں ] (]) 08:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
--] 21:44, 1 Aug 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll: |
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with that particular poll is dual, first it counted votes only in indian held kashmir, secondly it the only muslim concentrated area that it gave importance was areas sorrounding sirinagar. |
|
|
|
|
|
Secondly If you are going to mention a poll in an article about "history of pakistan" which forces the user to conclude about a contentious issue which has taken more then 50 years to resolve, then it could only be a poll which takes the whole population into account without being under the influence of pakistani or indian governments. |
|
|
|
|
|
The second statement that i deleted was about the three wars, it was because the if you mention such a generalized statement then you should better come up with your authentic references, because you can only be sure about the 70's war the other two.... you cant. |
|
|
|
|
|
A survey by an indian organization finds 74% people want freedom!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001008/j&k.htm#2 |
|
|
|
|
|
== Vedic Civilization == |
|
|
|
|
|
I thought pakistani punjab was the cradle of the vedic civilization. I am surprised that there is no mention of it at all in the history of pakistan. The Indo-Greeks come suddenly after the Indus Valley Civilization, and there's a gap of a couple of thousand years. |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
== POV == |
|
|
|
|
|
Some user has recenty edited the article drastically to make it conform to the theory that Pakistan was never a part of India, apart from small intermittent periods from time to time, and that Pakistan was always a separate entity. |
|
|
One example is this: |
|
|
"When the Abdali kingdom weakened early in the 19th century due to internecine warfare, Pakistan did not revert to Indian control but instead an independent kingdom arose in Punjab headed by the Sikh leader Ranjit Singh....." |
|
|
|
|
|
These edits seem to convey a point of view that Pakistan always existed as a separate nation for thousands of years, which was colonized by India from time to time. Someone please read the article thoroughly and make it less POV. ] 30 June 2005 00:37 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I can do it myself too, but I am tired of vandals who would come again and restore the changes, and perhaps also get me blocked. ] 30 June 2005 00:39 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another gem: |
|
|
|
|
|
'''So far one of our objects has been to underline the fact that right from the days of the Indus Valley Civilization down to the end of the Ghaznavid rule at the fall of the 12th century A.D. over a period of more than four thousand years, Pakistan has been invariably a single, compact, separate entity either independent or part of powers located to her west; its dependence on or forming part of India was merely an exception and that too for an extremely short period. It was only when the Muslims established themselves at Delhi early in the 13 century A.D. that Pakistan was made a part of India, but not in the pre-Muslim period. And once Muslims' successors in the sub-continent, the British, relinquished power in the middle of the 20th century, Pakistan reverted to its normal position of an independent country. Indian propaganda that the division of this sub-continent was unnatural and unrealistic is fake and fraudulent. Muslims had joined this region of Pakistan with India in the early 13th century A.D. when the Delhi Sultanate was formed; again Muslims have disconnected it from India giving it the normal and natural form which its geographical, ethnical, cultural and religious identity demanded.''' |
|
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
